Open Access

A Model System for Dimensional Competition in Nanostructures: A Quantum Wire on a Surface

Nanoscale Research Letters20083:140

DOI: 10.1007/s11671-008-9126-4

Received: 16 January 2008

Accepted: 13 March 2008

Published: 2 April 2008

Abstract

The retarded Green’s function (EH + iε)−1is given for a dimensionally hybrid Hamiltonian which interpolates between one and two dimensions. This is used as a model for dimensional competition in propagation effects in the presence of one-dimensional subsystems on a surface. The presence of a quantum wire generates additional exponential terms in the Green’s function. The result shows how the location of the one-dimensional subsystem affects propagation of particles.

Keywords

Fermions in reduced dimensions Nanowires Quantum wires

Introduction

One-dimensional field theory is frequently used for quantum wires or nanowires [13] or nanotubes [47]. Two-dimensional field theory has become a universally accepted tool for the theoretical modeling of particles and quasi-particles on surfaces, interfaces, and thin films. The success of low-dimensional field theory in applications to the quantum hall effects [810], impurity scattering in low-dimensional system (see e.g. [1116]), and the confirmation of low-dimensional critical exponents in experimental samples [1722] confirm that low-dimensional field theories are useful tools for the description of low-dimensional condensed matter systems.

The properties of a physical system have a strong dependence on the number of dimensionsd. A straightforward example is provided by the zero energy Green’s functionG(r)| E=0, which is proportional tor ind = 1 and proportional to lnr ind = 2, and decays liker 2 − d in higher dimensions. Green’s functions determine correlation functions, two-particle interaction potentials, propagation of initial conditions, scattering off perturbations, susceptibilities, and densities of states in quantum physics. It is therefore of interest to study systems of mixed dimensionality, where competition of dimensions can manifest itself in the properties of particle propagators.

To address questions of dimensional competition analytically in the framework of interfaces in a bulk material, dimensionally hybrid Hamiltonians of the form
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ1_HTML.gif
(1)
were introduced in [23]. The corresponding first quantized Hamiltonian is
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ2_HTML.gif
(2)

Here the convention is to use vector notation https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq1_HTML.gif for directions parallel to an interface, while z is orthogonal to the interface. From a practical side, Hamiltonians of the form (2) may be used to investigate propagation effects of weakly coupled particles in the presence of an interface. From a theoretical side, the Hamiltonians (1,2) are of interest for the analytic study of competition between two-dimensional and three-dimensional motion.

The two-dimensional mass parameter μ is a mass per length. In simple models it is given by
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equa_HTML.gif

where depending on the model, https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq2_HTML.gif is either a bulk penetration depth of states bound to the interface at z = z 0 or a thickness of the interface, see [24].

The zero energy Green’s function for the Hamiltonians (1,2) for perturbations in the interface (z′ = z 0 = 0, https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq3_HTML.gif ) satisfies
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equb_HTML.gif
and was found in [23] ( https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq4_HTML.gif ),
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ3_HTML.gif
(3)
The Green’s function in the interface is given in terms of a Struve function and a Bessel function,
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ4_HTML.gif
(4)
and interpolates between two-dimensional and three-dimensional distance laws (see Fig. 1),
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ5_HTML.gif
(5)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ6_HTML.gif
(6)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The upper dotted line is the three-dimensional Green's function (4πr) −1 in units of ℓ−1, the continuous line is the Green's function (4), and the lower dotted line is the two-dimensional logarithmic Green’s function. x = r/ℓ

The corresponding energy-dependent Green’s function was also recently reported [24]. However, another system of great practical and theoretical interest concerns quantum wires or nanowires on surfaces. Preparation techniques for one-dimensional nanostructures were recently reviewed in reference [25]. We will examine the corresponding dimensionally hybrid Hamiltonian and its Green’s function in this paper.

The Hamiltonian

We wish to discuss effects of dimensionality of nanostructures on the propagation of weakly coupled particles in the framework of a simple model system. We assume large de Broglie wavelengths h/p compared to lateral dimensions of nanostructures, and for our model system we also neglect electromagnetic effects or interactions, bearing in mind that these effects are highly relevant in realistic nanostructures [26, 27].

The model system which we have in mind consists of non-relativistic particles or quasi-particles tied to a surface. The surface carries a one-dimensional wire. The x direction is along the wire and the y direction is orthogonal to the wire. The wire is located at y = y 0. The particles can move with a mass m on the surface, but motion along the wire may be described by a different effective mass m *. In case of a weak attraction to substructures, kinetic operators can be split between bulk motion and motion along substructures [24]. Alternatively, for large lateral de Broglie wavelength relative to lateral extension https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq5_HTML.gif of a substructure, one can also argue that the lateral integral of the kinetic energy density along a substructure only yields a factor https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq6_HTML.gif in the kinetic energy for motion along the substructure. In either case we end up with an approximation for the kinetic energy operator of the particles of the form
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ7_HTML.gif
(7)
where the mass parameter https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq7_HTML.gif is a mass per lateral attenuation length of bound states, or a mass per lateral extension of the substructure. The operator (7) is the second quantized kinetic Hamiltonian for the particles. The corresponding first quantized Hamiltonian is
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ8_HTML.gif
(8)

The wire corresponds to a channel in which propagation of a particle comes with a different cost in terms of kinetic energy. It is intuitively clear that existence of this channel will affect propagation of the particles on the surface, and we will discuss this in terms of a resulting Green’s function for the Hamiltonians (7,8).

The Green’s Function ink Space

The Hamiltonians (7,8) yield the Schrödinger equation
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ9_HTML.gif
(9)
and the corresponding equation for the Green’s function in the energy representation,
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equc_HTML.gif
The last equation reads in (x,y) representation and with the convention https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq8_HTML.gif
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ10_HTML.gif
(10)
Substitution of the Fourier transform
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equd_HTML.gif
yields
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ11_HTML.gif
(11)
This yields with
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Eque_HTML.gif
the condition
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ12_HTML.gif
(12)
This result implies that https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq9_HTML.gif must have the form
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equf_HTML.gif
with the yet to be determined function https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq10_HTML.gif satisfying
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ13_HTML.gif
(13)
Substitution of
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equg_HTML.gif
yields
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equh_HTML.gif
We finally find
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ14_HTML.gif
(14)
where the definition
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equi_HTML.gif

was used. https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq11_HTML.gif ) is the Green’s function which we would use ink space Feynman rules. It is also instructive to switch toy representation for the transverse direction to see the impact of the wire on particle propagation.

The Green’s Function in Mixed Representations and Impurity Scattering

It is well known in surface science that Green’s functions can also be given in closed form in mixed representations, where momentum coordinates are used along the surface and configuration space coordinates are used for the transverse directions. The same observation applies here. In particular, the Green’s function with one transverse momentum replaced by a transverse coordinate is given by
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ15_HTML.gif
(15)
The Green’s function with both arguments for the transverse direction given in terms of configuration space coordinates is
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ16_HTML.gif
(16)
The first order perturbation of a state ψ0(x,y) due to scattering off an impurity potential V(x,y) corresponds to
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ17_HTML.gif
(17)

The result (16) shows peculiar distance effects between the location of the wire and the perturbation or impurity on the one hand, and between the location of the wire and they coordinate of the wave function on the other hand. In both cases, the wavelength (for https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq12_HTML.gif ) or attenuation length (for https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq13_HTML.gif ) are the same as in the terms from the unperturbed surface propagator. In the evanescent case, the impact of the wire on impurity scattering is exponentially suppressed if either the impurity is located far from the wire or if the wave function is considered far from the wire. In the non-evanescent case the perturbation of the propagator due to the wire becomes a strongly oscillating function of https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq14_HTML.gif far from the wire. Therefore the impact of the wire will also be small if we consider wave packets far from the wire.

For a simple application of (17) consider a wire at y 0 = 0 and an impurity potential
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equj_HTML.gif
The plane wave https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq15_HTML.gif with https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq16_HTML.gif is a solution of the Schrödinger Eq. 9 which satisfies the conditions for the approximation (7). In this case we get a scattering amplitude
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_Equ18_HTML.gif
(18)

The equation for ℓ = 0 is just the standard result for scattering from a pointlike impurity in mixed representation. The presence of the wire reduces the scattering cross section of the impurity for orthogonal infall.

Equations 15 and 16 also show that the effects of the additional terms should be most noticeable ifk x 1. Since https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9126-4/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9126_IEq17_HTML.gif promising samples should have an effective mass m * for motion along a quantum or nanowire which is much smaller than the effective mass m for motion along the surface. What comes to mind is an InSb nanowire on a Si surface. Scattering of surface particles off impurities in the presence of the wire should exhibit the additional propagator terms.

Conclusion

A simple model system for dimensional competition in nanostructures has been proposed. The system assumes that motion along a wire on a surface comes with a different cost in terms of kinetic energy, e.g. due to effective mass effects. The dimensionally hybrid retarded Green’s function for the propagation of free particles in the system was found in closed analytic form both ink space and in mixed (k x ,y) representations. The wire generates extra exponential terms in the propagator of the particles. The attenuation lengths or wavelengths in the evanescent or oscillating case, respectively, are the same as for the unperturbed propagator, but the extra terms exhibit distance effects between the particles and the wire.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NSERC Canada. I also gratefully acknowledge the generous hospitality of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics while this work was completed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

References

  1. Wu H, Sprung DWL: J. Martorell, Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 45: 11960. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.11960View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wan CC, Mozos JL, Taraschi G, Wang J, Guo H: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1997, 71: 419. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkslygsLY%3D] 10.1063/1.119328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Garcia-Vidal FJ, Flores F, Davison SG: Prog. Surf. Sci.. 2003, 74: 177. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXos1Kit7k%3D] 10.1016/j.progsurf.2003.08.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ando T, Suzuura H: Physica E. 2003, 18: 202. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXktVKgsb4%3D]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ando T: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.. 2005, 74: 777. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjvVKjt74%3D] 10.1143/JPSJ.74.777View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Umegaki T, Ogawa M, Miyoshi T: J. Appl. Phys.. 2006, 99: 034307. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xhs1Whurk%3D] 10.1063/1.2169877View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ando T, Asada Y, Uryu S: Phys. Stat. Sol. A. 2007, 204: 1882. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntl2msLk%3D] 10.1002/pssa.200675305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Laughlin RB: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1983, 50: 1395. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty T, Pietiläinen P: The Quantum Hall Effects. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakraborty T: Adv. Phys. 2000, 49: 959. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktlWmuw%3D%3D] 10.1080/00018730050198161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lake R, Klimeck G, Bowen RC, Jovanovic D: J. Appl. Phys.. 1997, 81: 7845. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjvFCmurc%3D] 10.1063/1.365394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu Y, Willander M: Surf. Sci.. 1997, 391: 81. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXotFSns78%3D] 10.1016/S0039-6028(97)00457-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazon KT, Hai GQ, Lee MT, Koenraad PM, van der AFW: Stadt, Phys. Rev. B. 2004, 70: 193312. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVGgs7vO] 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.193312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shytov AV, Mishchenko EG, Engel HA, Halperin BI: Phys. Rev. B. 2006, 73: 075316. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XisFelsrk%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.075316View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Grimaldi C, Cappelluti E, Marsiglio F: Phys. Rev. B. 2006, 73: 081303. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XivV2is7k%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.081303View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ando T: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.. 2006, 75: 074716. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xpt1SktLc%3D] 10.1143/JPSJ.75.074716View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Baberschke K: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1992, 68: 1208. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38XhvVKhsrg%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Back CH, Würsch C, Vaterlaus A, Ramsperger U, Maler U, Pescia D: Nature. 1995, 378: 597. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXpvVChsLo%3D] 10.1038/378597a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Elmers H-J, Hauschild J, Gradmann U: Phys. Rev. B. 1996, 54: 15224. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XnsVSkur0%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.15224View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. M.J. Dunlavy, D. Venus, Phys. Rev. B 69, 094411 (2004); Phys. Rev. B 71, 144406 (2005)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wildes AR, Ronnow HM, Roessli B, Harris MJ, Godfrey KW: Phys. Rev. B. 2006, 74: 094422. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVGkt7%2FN] 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.094422View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Takekoshi K, Sasaki Y, Ema K, Yao H, Takanishi Y, Takezoe H: Phys. Rev. E. 2007, 75: 031704. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkvVeksLk%3D] 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.031704View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dick R: Int. J. Theor. Phys.. 2003, 42: 569. 10.1023/A:1024446017417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Dick, Physica E 40, 524 (2008); arXiv:0707.1901v2 [condmat]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruda HE, Polyani JC, Yang J, Wu Z, Philipose U, Xu T, Yang S, Kavanagh KL, Liu JQ, Yang L, Wang Y, Robbie K, Yang J, Kaminska K, Cooke DG, Hegmann FA, Budz AJ, Haugen HK: Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2006, 1: 99. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFGitLjK] 10.1007/s11671-006-9016-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruda H, Shik A: Physica E. 2000, 6: 543. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsFOnsrs%3D] 10.1016/S1386-9477(99)00104-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Achosyan A, Petrosyan S, Craig W, Ruda HE, Shik A: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 101: 104308. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmtleru7s%3D] 10.1063/1.2734954View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© to the authors 2008