Converting Layered Zinc Acetate Nanobelts to One-dimensional Structured ZnO Nanoparticle Aggregates and their Photocatalytic Activity

  • Ye Zhang1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Feng Zhu1,

      Affiliated with

      • Junxi Zhang1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Lingli Xia2

          Affiliated with

          Nanoscale Research Letters20083:201

          DOI: 10.1007/s11671-008-9136-2

          Received: 4 May 2008

          Accepted: 30 May 2008

          Published: 18 June 2008


          We were successful in synthesizing periodic layered zinc acetate nanobelts through a hydrothermal solution process. One-dimensional structured ZnO nanoparticle aggregate was obtained by simple thermal annealing of the above-mentioned layered ZnO acetate nanobelts at 300 °C. The morphology, microstructure, and composition of the synthesized ZnO and its precursors were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and infrared spectroscopy, respectively. Low angle X-ray diffraction spectra reveal that as-synthesized zinc acetate has a layered structure with two interlayer d-spacings (one is 1.32 nm and the other is 1.91 nm). SEM and TEM indicate that nanobelt precursors were 100–200 nm in width and possesses length up to 30 μm. Calcination of precursor in air results in the formation of one-dimensional structured ZnO nanoparticle aggregates. In addition, the as-prepared ZnO nanoparticle aggregates exhibit high photocatalytic activity for the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO).


          Nanostructures Hydrothermal crystal growth Nanomaterials Semiconducting II–VI materials


          ZnO is one of the most important wide band gap (3.37 at room temperature) semiconductors because of its promising potential applications in room temperature UV lasers [1], sensors [2, 3], solar cells [4, 5], transparent electrodes [6], and piezoelectric actuators [7]. In recent years, regulating the shape of semiconductor nanostructures has been a subject of intensive research because it provides an effective strategy for tuning the electronic, magnetic, optical, and catalytic properties of a semiconductor. For example, Duan et al. successfully synthesized zigzig SnO2 nanobelts via physical vapor deposition method [8]. Pan et al. prepared single-crystal CdSxSe1−x nanobelts and investigated their optical properties [9]. Orthorhombic Pb3O2Cl2 (mendipite) nanobelts were synthesized via a solventless thermolysis of a single-source precursor in the presence of capping ligands by Sigman et al. [10]. Venugopal et al. also fabricated single crystalline nanobelts via laser ablation assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method [11]. It is worthy to mention that S. H. Yu’ group successfully synthesized single-crystal CuGeO3 nanobelts with a layered mesostructure via a simple hydrothermal route [12]. Chen et al. also synthesized Tungstate-based inorganic–organic hybrid nanobelts/nanotubes with highly ordered lamellar mesostructures and tunable interlayer distances in nonpolar solvents [13]. Layered structure makes it easy to intercalate different elements into the interlayer space [14]. Then, layered structures combined with belt-like morphology would provide opportunities for developing new types of nanostructures that are doped with different elements. In this paper, we show that periodic layered zinc acetate nanobelts can be synthesized by a facile hydrothermal solution method.

          In addition, one-dimensional structured ZnO nanoparticle aggregate was obtained by calcination of the precursor in air. ZnO can be used as photocatalytical semiconductor due to a band gap, which can be activated by UV-irradiation [15]. Under UV-irradiation, holes and electrons are yielded which possess an oxidation potential large enough to generate OH· radicals or O2 . In this paper, the photocatalytic properties of ZnO nanoparticle aggregates are studied at length.

          Experimental Section

          All chemicals were analytical grade and used as received without further purification. In a typical synthesis, 4.0 g zinc acetate, 3.6 g CTAB, and 180 g deionized water were added into a 200 mL beaker. Under vigorous magnetic stirring, ammonia (25 wt%) was dropped into the solution to increase pH value to 8.2. White precipitation was yielded. Then, the solution were transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and sealed tightly. The autoclave was kept in an oven with temperature 50 °C for 24 h. White gel-like precipitation was found deposited on the bottom of the Teflon cup. After filtration, the precipitate was washed (three times) thoroughly with distilled water and ethanol to remove any alkaline salt and surfactants that remained in the final products and dried at room temperature in air for 12 h. Paper-like products formed on the filter paper. Thermal treatments were carried out at 300 °C in air for 1 h. The as-prepared samples were characterized by field emission scanning electron microcopy (SEM) (SEM: Sirion 200 FEG), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL 2010, accelerating voltage of 200 kV), selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) (JEOL 2010, accelerating voltage of 200 kV). X-ray diffraction spectra (XRD) (Philips X’pert-PRO, Cu Kα (0.15419 nm) radiation), and infrared spectroscopy. (Cary 5E UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometer).

          Aqueous suspensions employed in photocatalytic experiments usually contained 3 g L−1of as-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles and a 10 mg L−1concentration of methyl orange. All kinetic experiments were performed under atmospheric conditions and constant magnetic stirring. The ZnO suspensions with methyl orange were illuminated continuously with light from a 30 W mercury lamp (2,537 Å). The distance between lamp and suspension is ~10 cm.

          Results and Discussions

          Layered Structured Zinc Acetate Nanobelts

          Zinc acetate nanobelts were synthesized via a mild hydrothermal solution process at 50 °C. Nanobelt-like structures were characterized by TEM (Fig. 1). The average width of the nanobelts was 100–200 nm, and their lengths ranged from 10 to 30 μm. Growth temperature plays a key role in formation of nanobelt-like morphology. Temperature higher than 80 °C only resulted in the formation of microwhiskers or sheetlike structures. pH value is also important. pH value higher than 9 or lower than 7 results in no precipitates in solution. Low angle XRD pattern of as-synthesized zinc acetate nanobelts is shown in Fig. 2. The strongest diffraction peak at 2θ = 6.7° corresponds to an interlayer d-spacing of 1.32 nm (the 001(a) diffraction of layered structure) and another diffraction peak at 2θ = 4.4° accords with the other interlayer d-spacing of 1.91 nm (the 001(b) diffraction of layered structure). The peaks at 8.8°, 13.3°, and 20.1° can be attributed to the second and third order diffraction of (00l) plane of Zn(OH)x(CH3COO)y · zH2O, respectively. Since it is convenient to introduce ions, such as N3−, Mg2+, Cd2+, Mn2+, to the interlayer spacing by ionic exchange reaction, this hierarchically structured zinc acetate as precursor of ZnO looks promising future for fabricating functional electrical device. Infrared spectroscopy of zinc acetate (Fig. 3) was also measured to give information of the CH3COO group and OH group within the interlayer. The broad absorption band at 3,420 cm−1 can be assigned to the OH group and water. The two weak peaks at 2,920 and 2,850 cm−1 are due to the C–H stretching band. The absorption band at 1,550 cm−1 originates from the antisymmetric COO stretching vibration. The band at 1,390 cm−1 is attributed to the symmetric COO stretching vibration mode. The bands at 1,340 and 1,010 cm−1 can be assigned to the deformation and rocking modes of the CH3 group [1619]. The difference between antisymmetric COO stretching vibration band and symmetric COO stretching vibration band is 160 cm−1. This large difference means that COO is in monodentate state rather than free group state. It is suggested that the coordination of the COO groups to zinc cations for layered zinc acetate is monodentate. In another word, acetate anions are coordinated to polynuclear zinc hydroxyl layers in a monodentate manner.

          Figure 1

          TEM images of as-synthesized zinc acetate nanobelts at different magnifications. Scale bar: 0.5 μm

          Figure 2

          Low angle XRD pattern of as-synthesized zinc acetate nanobelts

          Figure 3

          IR spectrum of as-synthesized zinc acetate nanobelts

          One-dimensional Structured ZnO Nanoparticles Aggregate

          ZnO was obtained by calcinations of the above precursor in air at 300 °C. XRD pattern demonstrates that the produced product shows a high-quality wurtzite ZnO structure, as shown in Fig. 4. Compared with the XRD pattern of precursor, no diffraction peaks appear in the low angle range. It means layer structure collapses under heat treatment. TEM images (Fig. 5) show that chain-like ZnO nanoparticle aggregates were formed under calcinations. The nanoparticle size measured from the TEM image is 10–25 nm. The average crystallite size for ZnO nanoparticle was also determined from the linewidth broadening of the XRD peak corresponding to (002) reflection, using the Debye–Scherrer equation. The value of crystal size is 20 nm, which is consistent with the result of TEM observation.

          Figure 4

          XRD pattern of ZnO nanoparticle aggregate obtained by thermal treatment at 300 °C in air

          Figure 5

          TEM images of one-dimensional ZnO nanoparticle aggregate. Scale bar: 50 nm

          Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange (MO) by One-dimensional Structured ZnO Nanoparticle Aggregates

          Methyl orange (C14H14N3 · SO3Na) is one of the representative azo class of dyes, which are the most important class of synthetic organic dyes used in the textile industry and are also common industrial pollutants. The photocatalytic properties of ZnO nanoparticle on degradation of methyl orange were studied. Extent of photocatalytic degradation was determined by the reduction in absorbance of the solution. Figure 6 shows a typical time-dependent UV–vis spectrum. The absorption peaks corresponding to the dye diminished after 2 h photoirradiation. The rapid disappearance of the absorption band in Fig. 6 suggests that the functional group responsible for the characteristic color of the MO dye is broken down. Since the power of UV lamp we used is very low (only 30 W), nanoparticle aggregates present high photocatalytic degradation efficiency to methyl orange. The reason is as follows: it is known that the photocatalytic activity of ZnO is strongly dependent on the growth direction of the crystal plane. Polar plane of ZnO exhibits higher photocatalytic activity than nonpolar plane of ZnO [20]. After calcinations, the polar (001) Zn planes of ZnO emerge on the surface of aggregate. An increase of polar Zn (0001) or O (0001) faces leads to a significant enhancement of photocatalytic activity of ZnO.

          Figure 6

          UV–vis spectrum of ZnO/methyl orange solution


          In summary, hierarchically structured zinc acetate nanobelts were successfully synthesized via a mild hydrothermal method. The zinc acetate nanobelts possess layered structure with two interlayer d-spacings (1.32–1.91 nm). Acetate anions are coordinated to polynuclear zinc hydroxyl layers in a monodentate manner. Nanobelt precursors are 100–200 nm in width, 10–20 nm in thickness, and possess length up to 30 μm. The layered ZnO acetate nanobelts were successfully converted to one-dimensional structured ZnO nanoparticle aggregate through simple thermal treatment of the above-mentioned precursor at 300 °C. The nanoparticle size is 10–25 nm. Photocatalytic experiment indicated that UV/one-dimensional ZnO nanoparticle aggregate process could be efficiently used to degrade azo class of dyes, such as MO.



          Authors acknowledge the support from the National Key Project of Fundamental Research for Nanomaterials and Nanostructures (Grant No. 2005CB623603) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui (Grant No. 070414196).

          Authors’ Affiliations

          Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, and Anhui Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanostructures, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
          Basic Experiment Center, Fundamental Department, Artillery Academy P.L.A


          1. Huang MH, Mao S, Feick H, Yan H, Wu Y, Kind H, et al.: Science. 2001, 292: 1897. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksVaqsb0%3D] 10.1126/science.1060367View Article
          2. Zang JF, Li CM, Cui XQ, Wang JX, Sun XW, Dong H, et al.: Electroanalysis. 2007, 19: 1008. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXls1ymtr4%3D] 10.1002/elan.200603808View Article
          3. Ferro R, Rodriguez JA, Bertrand P: Physica Status Solidi. c. 2005, 2: 3754. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpsFagsrk%3D] 10.1002/pssc.200461815View Article
          4. Young DL, Keane J, Duda A, AbuShama JAM, Perkins CL, Romero M, Noufi R: Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl.. 2003, 11: 535. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXktVGqtA%3D%3D] 10.1002/pip.516View Article
          5. Calderon C, Gordillo G, Olarte J: Physica Status Solidi b. 2005, 242: 1915. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmvVyqsr8%3D] 10.1002/pssb.200461747View Article
          6. Iechi H, Okawara T, Sakai M, Nakanura M, Kudo K: Electr. Eng. Jpn.. 2007, 158: 49–55. 10.1002/eej.20151View Article
          7. Wang ZL, Song JH: Science. 2006, 312: 242. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjtlKqu7g%3D] 10.1126/science.1124005View Article
          8. Duan JH, Yang SG, Liu HW, Gong JF, Huang HB, Zhao X, et al.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 6180. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivFWrs7g%3D] 10.1021/ja042748dView Article
          9. Pan AL, Yang H, Liu RB, Yu R, Zou BS, Wang ZL: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 15692. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFahsrrJ] 10.1021/ja056116iView Article
          10. Sigman MB, Korgel BA: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 10089. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlsV2rtLk%3D] 10.1021/ja051956iView Article
          11. Venugopal R, Lin PI, Liu CC, Chen YT: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 11262. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmt1Krt7Y%3D] 10.1021/ja044270jView Article
          12. Song RQ, Xu AW, Yu SH: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2007, 129: 4152. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXislKku7k%3D] 10.1021/ja070536lView Article
          13. Chen DL, Sugahara Y: Chem. Mater.. 2007, 19: 1808. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXisVOms7Y%3D] 10.1021/cm062039uView Article
          14. Wang Y, Cao GZ: Chem. Mater.. 2006, 18: 2787. 10.1021/cm052765hView Article
          15. Jang ES, Won JH, Hwang SJ, Choy JH: Adv. Mater.. 2006, 18: 3309. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnvVyhsw%3D%3D] 10.1002/adma.200601455View Article
          16. Baraldi P, Fabbri G: Spectrochim. Acta. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.. 1981, 37: 89. 10.1016/0584-8539(81)80092-XView Article
          17. Scott K, Zhang Y, Wang R, Clearfield A: Chem. Mater.. 1995, 7: 1095. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXlvFWrsr8%3D] 10.1021/cm00054a008View Article
          18. Nakamoto K: Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds 4th edn. Wiley, New York; 1986.
          19. Milev AS, Kannangara GSK, Wilson MA: Langmuir. 2004, 20: 1888. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXls1WqtA%3D%3D] 10.1021/la0355601View Article
          20. Jang ES, Won JH, Hwang SJ, Choy JH: Adv. Mater.. 2006, 18: 3309. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnvVyhsw%3D%3D] 10.1002/adma.200601455View Article


          © to the authors 2008