Open Access

A Simple Method to Synthesize Cadmium Hydroxide Nanobelts

Nanoscale Research Letters20083:284

DOI: 10.1007/s11671-008-9150-4

Received: 6 May 2008

Accepted: 11 July 2008

Published: 9 August 2008


Cd(OH)2nanobelts have been synthesized in high yield by a convenient polyol method for the first time. XRD, XPS, FESEM, and TEM were used to characterize the product, which revealed that the product consisted of belt-like crystals about 40 nm in thickness and length up to several hundreds of micrometers. Studies found that the viscosity of the solvent has important influence on the morphology of the final products. The optical absorption spectrum indicates that the Cd(OH)2nanobelts have a direct band gap of 4.45 eV.


Crystal morphology Nanobelt Viscosity Hydrothermal


One-dimensional (1D) nanostructures such as wires, rods, belts, and tubes, whose lateral dimensions fall anywhere in the range of 1–100 nm, have become the focus of intensive research, owing to their unique applications in mesoscopic physics and fabrication of nanoscale devices [16]. Among one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures, nanobelts (or nanoribbons), a relatively new family of 1D nanostructures with a rectangular cross section, have received increasing attention since the discovery of novel oxide semiconductor nanobelts [48]. A variety of functional oxide [3, 9] and sulfide [1017] nanobelts have been successfully fabricated by simple thermal evaporation. The methods used in 1D nanostructure synthesis and hydrothermal processes have emerged as powerful tools for the fabrication of anisotropic nanomaterials with some significant advantages, such as controllable particle size and low-temperature, cost-effective, and less-complicated techniques. Under hydrothermal conditions, many starting materials can undergo quite unexpected reactions, which are often accompanied by the formation of nanoscopic morphologies that are not accessible by classical routes [18]. In recent years, 1D nanomaterials such as Ln(OH)3 [1921], CdWO4 [22], MoO3 [23], and Dy(OH)3 [24] have been successfully synthesized using hydrothermal methods.

Cadmium hydroxide, Cd(OH)2, is a wide band gap semiconductor [25] with a wide range of possible applications including solar cells, photo transistors and diodes, transparent electrodes, sensors, etc. [26, 27]. Cadmium hydroxide is also the precursor to prepare cadmium oxide [18]. As a consequence, numerous techniques have been proposed to synthesize nano-sized Cd(OH)2 particles with promising control of properties [2528]. However, up to now, to our best knowledge, the synthesis of Cd(OH)2 nanobelts by hydrothermal process has not been reported. Herein, we report the preparation of cadmium hydroxide nanobelts by the conventional polyol assisted hydrothermal process.

Materials and Methods

In a typical procedure; CdCl2 · 2H2O (0.2281 g) was dissolved in 32 mL of distilled water, and then NH3 · H2O (25 wt.%, 5 mL) was slowly added into the solution and stirred for about 10 min, and a transparent Cd(NH3)42−solution was formed. Then, the above solution was loaded into a 50-mL Teflon-lined autoclave, which was then filled with 8 mL of glycol. The autoclave was sealed, warmed up at a speed of 3 ºC/min and maintained at 100 ºC for 6 h, and was then cooled to room temperature on standing. The white precipitate was filtered off, washed with absolute ethanol and distilled water for several times, and then dried in vacuum at 40 ºC for 4 h.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were carried out on a Japan Rigaku D/max rA X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphitemonochromatized high-intensity Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.541784 Å). The accelerating voltage was set at 50 kV, with 100 mA flux at a scanning rate of 0.06°/s in the 2θ range 10–80°. The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were collected on an ESCALab MKII X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using nonmonochromatized Mg KR X-ray as the excitation source. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images were taken on a JEOL JSM-6700FSEM. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were characterized by Hitachi H-800 transmission electron microscope with a tungsten filament and an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

Results and Discussion

The XRD pattern (Fig. 1) from the as-synthesized bulk samples reveals the crystal structure and phase purity of the products. All the diffraction peaks can be indexed to the hexagonal Cd(OH)2with cell constantsa = 3.4942,c = 4.7102, which are consistent with the values in the literature (JCPDS 31-0228). The abnormally intensified (100) peak in the XRD pattern also indicates that the belt-like product comprises 1D Cd(OH)2crystals preferentially grown along the [001] direction.
Figure 1

Powder XRD patterns of the products

Figure 2 shows the XPS spectra of the as-obtained Cd(OH)2 sample. A survey spectrum shown in Fig. 2a, indicates the presence of Cd and O as well as C from reference. There are no peaks for other impurities, indicating that the as-obtained product is relatively pure. High-resolution spectra are also taken for the Cd 3d region and the O 1s region to determine the valency state and atomic ratio. The binding energies of Cd(3d5/2) and O(1s) were found to be 405.30 and 531.25 eV, respectively. All the above observed binding energy values are in good agreement with the reported data [29, 30]. Quantification of the XPS peaks gives the molar ratio of Cd:O as 1:2.02, close to the stoichiometry of Cd(OH)2. This also validated our speculation in XRD study.
Figure 2

XPS analysis of the nanobelts

A typical low-magnification FESEM image (Fig. 3a) shows that the as-synthesized products consist of a large quantity of 1D nanostructures with lengths from several tens to several hundreds of micrometers; some of them even have lengths of the order of millimeters. A representative high magnification SEM image (Fig. 3b) of several curved Cd(OH)21D nanostructures reveals that their geometrical shape is belt-like, which is distinct from those of previously reported nanowires, and their thickness is about 30–50 nm.
Figure 3

Typical FESEM morphologies of the as-synthesized product. (a) Low-magnification image revealing large quantities of Cd(OH)2nanobelts. (b) High-magnification image of curved nanobelts

TEM and SAED studies of the as-synthesized products provide further insight into the belt-like Cd(OH)2nanostructures. Straight and curved Cd(OH)2nanobelts can be observed in Fig. 4b. The nanobelts are uniform in width and thickness, and their typical widths and thickness are in the range of 60–250 nm and 10–30 nm, respectively. The SAED pattern (inset in Fig. 4b) taken from the straight section of the curved nanobelt demonstrates that this particular nanobelt is a single crystal.
Figure 4

TEM images of Cd(OH)2nanobelts. (a) Regular Cd(OH)2 nanobelts. (b) Single curved Cd(OH)2 nanobelt

For the polyol process, glycol was selected as the solvent because of its excellent viscosity, which makes it possible to mix the reagents homogeneously. In the process, glycol can provide reaction conditions adequate to greatly enhance solubility, diffusion, and crystallization, but is still mild to leave molecular building blocks to bring about the formation of the solid-state phase. At reaction temperature, the diffusion of ions in glycol is more rapid than in other polyol, such as glycerine and diethylene glycol; this leads to acceleration in the solubility of starting materials and in the following crystal growth. Both higher viscosity and lower viscosity are not beneficial for getting unique geometrical nanostructures. The concentrations of glycol of about 20–30 vol.%, were found to be favorable for the formation of the Cd(OH)2 nanobelts in high yield. Such viscosity had a good effect on prohibiting aggregation of Cd(OH)2particles and then resulted in a relatively stable suspension. Control reactions at a low concentration of glycol (3 mL) would plate out a large amount of the Cd(OH)2 nanorods (Fig. 5a). At very high concentrations (20 mL glycol), however, only the aggregated particles were observed (Fig. 5b). Different solvents were also tested to reveal the solvent effect. When glycerine was used, nanobelts were not obtained due to the high viscosity of solvent. Usage of other polyol leads to similar results. From the experimental results, we can clearly see that the viscosity is of importance to the structure of the final product. The best solvent to get uniform belt-like pattern is glycol.
Figure 5

SEM images of Cd(OH)2 samples using different concentrations of glycol: (a) 3 mL; (b) 20 mL

The optical absorption spectrum of our sample is shown in Fig. 6. Compared to other researcher’s work [26], the absorption edge obviously shifts toward shorter wavelength, i.e., blue shift. The absorption band gap Eg can be determined by the following equation: (αh υ) n = B(h υ − Eg) [31], in which h υ is the photo energy, α is the absorption coefficient, B is a constant relative to the material, and n is either 2 for a direct transition or 1/2 for an indirect transition. The (αh υ) 2 ~ h υ curve for the samples shown in Fig. 6 insert reveals that the band gap of the samples is about 4.45 ev, which is larger than the reported value for Cd(OH)2 thin film (Eg = 2.75 eV) [25], but is less than the reported value for nanostrands, which have a constant width of 1.9 nm (Eg = 4.76 eV) [28] due to the quantum size effect [32].
Figure 6

Optical absorption spectrum and (αh ν)2 ~ h ν curve for the Cd(OH)2 nanobelts


In summary, Cd(OH)2nanobelts with a uniform diameter have been successfully prepared in high yield through a rapid polyol process. It was found that the viscosity of the solvent played an important role in determining the morphology. We believe that it should be possible to synthesize other similar patterns by choosing an appropriate solvent. The optical absorption spectrum indicates that the Cd(OH)2nanobelts have a direct band gap of 4.45 eV.



This work was supported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the CREST program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). We are grateful to young and middle aged academic leaders of Jiangsu Province universities’ “blue and green blue project.” We are grateful to the electron microscope and X-ray diffraction facilities of university of science & technology of china for assistance in XRD and SEM measurement.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Huaihai Institute of Technology
SORST, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)


  1. Frank S, Poncharal P, Wang ZL, de Heer WA: Science. 1998, 280: 1744. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjslOhu7g%3D] 10.1126/science.280.5370.1744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Duan XF, Liber CM: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2000, 122: 188. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnvF2qt7w%3D] 10.1021/ja993713uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Z.L. Wang, Adv. Mater. 12, 1295 (2000). doi:10.1002/1521-4095 (200009)12:17\1295::AID-ADMA1295[3.0.CO;2-BGoogle Scholar
  4. Pan ZW, Dai ZR, Wang ZL: Science. 1947, 291: 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Dong LH, Chu Y, Liu Y, Li MY, Yang FY, Li LL: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2006, 301: 503. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XotVars7Y%3D] 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.05.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rakovicha AY, Stockhausena V, Sushaa AS, Sapraa S, Rogach AL: Colloids Surf. A. 2008, 317: 737. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.12.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhou ZZ, Deng YL: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2007, 316: 183. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFGrtrzO] 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.07.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu YY, Yan HQ, Huang M, Messer B, Song JH, Yang PD: Chem Eur. J.. 2002, 8: 1261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai ZR, Pan ZW, Wang ZL: Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2003, 13: 9. 10.1002/adfm.200390013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma C, Moore D, Li J, Wang ZL: Adv. Mater.. 2003, 15: 228. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhs1ShtL0%3D] 10.1002/adma.200390052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang Y, Meng XM, Liu J, Xie Z, Lee Y, Lee ST: Adv. Mater.. 2003, 15: 323. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitlOjsrk%3D] 10.1002/adma.200390079View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Gong, S. Yang, J. Duan, R. Zhang, Y. Du, Chem. Commun. (Camb). 351 (2005). doi:10.1039/b412289eGoogle Scholar
  13. Liddell CM, Summers CJ: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2004, 274: 103. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsFOgs70%3D] 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jong T, Parry DL: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2004, 275: 61. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXktFKktrs%3D] 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yekeler M, Yekeler H: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2005, 284: 694. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXisVWktrs%3D] 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Borse PH, Vogel W, Kulkarni SK: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2006, 293: 437. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1aht73E] 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiriţă P, Descostes M: J. Coll. Inter. Sci.. 2006, 294: 376. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.07.047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang B, Zhuo LH, Ge JC, Niu JY, Shi ZQ: Inorg. Chem.. 2005, 44: 2568. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXisVSgsbs%3D] 10.1021/ic049195sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Peng ZA, Peng X: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2001, 123: 1389. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmslSgtA%3D%3D] 10.1021/ja0027766View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng ZA, Peng X: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2002, 124: 3343. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xhslegtro%3D] 10.1021/ja0173167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang X, Li YD: Chem. Eur. J.. 2003, 9: 5627. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1OjtLk%3D] 10.1002/chem.200304785View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao HW, Wang YF, Liu XM, Li YD, Qian YT: Chem. Mater.. 2000, 12: 2819. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsFGjtLw%3D] 10.1021/cm000096wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Patzke GR, Michailovski A, Krumeich F, Nesper R, Grunwaldt JD, Baiker A: Chem. Mater.. 2004, 16: 1126. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhs1Cmtrk%3D] 10.1021/cm031057yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu AW, Fang YP, You LP, Liu HQ: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2003, 125: 1494. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXksFersg%3D%3D] 10.1021/ja029181qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang H, Ma XY, Ji YJ, Xu J, Yang DR: Mater. Lett.. 2005, 59: 56. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsFSmt7k%3D] 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.08.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ristic M, Popovic S, Music S: Mater. Lett.. 2004, 58: 2494. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXkvVWmtrw%3D] 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.03.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mane RS, Han S-H: Electrochem. Commun.. 2005, 7: 205. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmvF2kug%3D%3D] 10.1016/j.elecom.2004.12.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo YH, Huang JG, Ichinose I: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 9: 8297.Google Scholar
  29. C.D. Wager, W.M. Riggs, L.E. Davis, J.F. Moulder, G.E. Muilenberg, Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation. Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie Minn., 55344 (1979)Google Scholar
  30. Hammaond JS, Gaarenstroom SW, Winograd N: Anal. Chem.. 1975, 47: 2194.Google Scholar
  31. Pankove JI: Optical processes in semiconductors. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 1971.Google Scholar
  32. X.H. Liao, J.H. Zhu, J.J. Zhu, J.Z. Xu, H.Y. Chen, Chem. Commun. (Camb) 937 (2001). doi:10.1039/b101004mGoogle Scholar


© to the authors 2008