Photo-Induced Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Quantum Wells

Nanoscale Research Letters20094:385

DOI: 10.1007/s11671-008-9241-2

Received: 14 November 2008

Accepted: 30 December 2008

Published: 17 January 2009

Abstract

We experimentally investigate the dynamics of spins in GaAs quantum wells under applied electric bias by photoluminescence (PL) measurements excited with circularly polarized light. The bias-dependent circular polarization of PL (PPL) with and without magnetic field is studied. ThePPLwithout magnetic field is found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing the strength of the negative bias. However,PPLin a transverse magnetic field shows oscillations under an electric bias, indicating that the precession of electron spin occurs in quantum wells. The results are discussed based on the electron–hole exchange interaction in the electric field.

Keywords

Photoluminescence Spin transport Exchange interaction

Introduction

Possibility of using information carried by the spin of the electron in electronic devices, in addition to its charge, has gained a lot of attention since the discovery of long spin lifetimes in semiconductor structures [1], leading to the growth of the field spintronics [13]. This may lead to new devices beyond well-established storage or memory applications, already implemented as giant magnetoresistance (GMR) read-heads and nonvolatile magnetic RAM (MRAM) [2].

One of the major hurdles in the development of spintronic devices has been the problem of efficiently injecting spin-polarized carriers into a semiconductor, transporting them over reasonable distances without spin-flipping and then detecting them. Much effort [3] has thus been spent in understanding the transport and dynamics of spins and the generation/injection and detection of spin currents in semiconductors. Generation of spin polarization usually means creating a nonequilibrium spin population. This has been achieved in various ways, e.g. by optical techniques, or by magnetic semiconductors or ferromagnetic contacts, with varying degrees of success [3]. Although the detection of spin current in semiconductors was previously been achieved mainly through optical methods [1], an electrical means of detecting spin current has been obtained recently [46]. Despite many efforts and substantial progress, a further major obstacle to the practical implementation of spintronics is the lack of a proper understanding of spin transport and dynamics in semiconductor-based heterostructures [3].

In this paper, we focus on spin dynamics in GaAs quantum wells (QWs) under applied electric bias by photoluminescence (PL) measurements excited with circularly polarized light [79]. We study the bias-dependent circular polarization of PL (PPL) with and without magnetic field. The PPL without magnetic field is found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing bias. However, PPL in a transverse magnetic field shows oscillations under an applied bias, indicating that the precession of electron spin occurs in QWs. The results are discussed by exploring the possible roles played in the observed phenomena.

Experimental

The samples studied in the present investigation were GaAs double QWs (10 nm) separated by a thin (~20 nm) Al0.3Ga0.7As barrier. The samples were grown on the Si-doped GaAs substrate. For the application of the external bias (field normal to the heterostructure layers), the top surface of the sample was coated with a semitransparent electrode (Au). We excited the sample by circularly polarized ps pulses of a tunable Ti: sapphire laser with a repetition rate of 76 MHz and measured the PL both in zero magnetic field and in a magnetic field (5 T) aligned perpendicular to the growth axis of the structure (Voigt geometry) using a streak camera. The PL was excited directly to the exciton absorption band and was detected with the small long-wavelength shift to minimize the polarization losses [10, 11]. The exciting beam was directed perpendicular to the magnetic field direction, and the PL was detected in the backward direction. A schema of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. All the measurements were done at liquid helium (LH) temperature by placing the samples in a cryostat. The degree of circular polarization (PPL) was calculated by defining it as the ratio of the difference of the signals of the right and left circularly polarized PL to their sum.
http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9241-2/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9241_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A schema of the experimental setup (BS beam splitter,P polarizer,Q quarter wave plate,L lens,LCR liquid crystal retarder,F filter,SC streak camera). The sample was placed in a LH cryostat (C)

Results and Discussion

The circularly polarized PL was studied as a function of the electric bias and of the external magnetic field. The PL was measured in the left and right circular polarizations under right circularly polarized excitation. In the absence of the magnetic field, the PL intensities with the same and opposite circular polarization for −2.5 V bias are shown in Fig. 2. Figure 3 shows the kinetics of the degree of circular PL polarization. As seen, the PL polarization kinetics of the QWs substantially depends on bias. In the absence of the bias (Fig. 3a), the kinetics of the PPL has a small slow component with the decay time 1 ns dominated by a fast component characterized by the decay time below 0.1 ns, in consistence with other observations [12, 13]. When a negative bias is applied to the top electrode of the sample, the amplitude of the slow component increases and, for the applied bias, this component predominates.
http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9241-2/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9241_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

PL intensities with the same (red line) and opposite (blue line) circular polarization at −2.5 V bias

http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9241-2/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9241_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

MeasuredPPLata zero,b−1.5 V andc−2.5 V biases

One more mechanisms of the relaxation of the excitonic spin oriented by the light might be possible. Relaxation can result in the PL depolarization due to a flip of the exciton spin as a whole or independent flips of the electron and hole spins [14]. In the first case, the decay time of the PPL is directly determined by the exciton spin relaxation rate [15]. If the carrier spins relax independently, the fast flip of the hole spin does not affect the PPL. In this case, the decay of the PPL is controlled by the relaxation of the long-lived electron spin. The above analysis reveals that the bias-induced changes in the polarized PL kinetics are related to transition from dynamics of the exciton spin to that of independent electron and hole spins. In the absence of the bias, the exchange coupling exceeds the spin–phonon interaction [16], and the main relaxation mechanism is given by the exciton spin flips, as mentioned above.

In the presence of the applied bias, the electric field reduces the electron–hole exchange coupling by spatially separating the charges, and as a result, the interaction of the hole spin with phonons becomes stronger than the exchange interaction. This leads to a breakage of the coupling between the electron and hole spins. As a consequence, the hole spin exhibits fast relaxation, while the electron spin holds its orientation, providing the slow component in the PPL decay. The decay time as measured at −2.5 V is 1 ns, which agrees with the literature value [17].

Figure 4 shows the PPL in the presence of the applied magnetic field for zero and −2.5 V bias. As can be seen, the effect of the bias on the polarized PL kinetics of the QWs appears to be more pronounced in the presence of the transverse H. For the −2.5 V bias, the polarization kinetics shows distinct oscillations symmetric with respect to the horizontal axis. An analysis of the PPL dynamics in H gives additional evidence for the exchange interaction suppression in an external electric field. In the presence of the bias, the hole spin rapidly relaxes and its projection onto the direction of observation varies. Being uncoupled with the hole spin, the electronic spin may freely precess around the magnetic field direction. The projection of the electron spin onto the direction of observation oscillates in time with the Larmor frequency ωL = g μBH/ℏ [18], where μB is the Bohr magneton, g is the electron-g factor and ℏ is the reduced Planck constant. The PPL should oscillate between +1 (100%) and −1 with the same frequency [19] because, when the hole spin has no preferential orientation, this quantity is determined only by the projection of the electron spin.
http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9241-2/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9241_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

PPLin the presence of the magnetic field ata zero andb−2.5 V bias

As can also be seen from Fig. 4, the oscillation amplitude is initially equal to ~0.8 and slowly decays with time. The data can be fitted by the exponentially damping harmonic function http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-008-9241-2/MediaObjects/11671_2008_Article_9241_IEq1_HTML.gif which gives ωL = 0.1 THz and the decay time τ = 200 ps for the −2.5 V bias and H = 5 T. The obtained oscillation frequency ωL corresponds to the value g = 22.7 × 10−2. This agrees with the experimental as well as theoretical estimates of the transverse electron g-factor in GaAs QWs [2022].

In the absence of the bias, there involves only the behaviour of the exciton spin as a whole. The H mixes the excitonic states, and as a result, the right circularly polarized light becomes capable of exciting several states. The kinetics of the polarized PL is controlled here by the interference of the states of the exciton fine structure split by the combined action of the magnetic field and exchange coupling induced by the external electric field [23, 24]. As Fig. 4a demonstrates, the PPL varies with time in a rather complicated fashion of the PL polarization kinetics [25], reflecting superposition of the beats at several frequencies. From the above discussion, one can conclude that application of the bias to the QWs weakens the exchange interaction between the electron and hole spins.

Conclusion

The dynamics of spins in GaAs QWs under applied electric bias has been experimentally investigated by PL measurements. The bias-dependentPPLwith and without magnetic field was studied. ThePPLwithout magnetic field was found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing negative bias. However,PPLin a transverse magnetic field showed oscillations under an applied bias. The oscillation amplitude was found to be increased with increasing the strength of the bias. The results were discussed based on the electron–hole exchange interaction in the electric field.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nanoscale Science and Technology Centre, Griffith University
(2)
School of Biomolecular and Physical Sciences, Griffith University
(3)
Department of Physics, University of Chittagong

References

  1. D.D. Awschalom, D. Loss, N. Samarth (ed.), Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer, Berlin, 2002)
  2. Prinz GA: Science. 1998, 282: 1660. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnslGhsLs%3D] 10.1126/science.282.5394.1660View Article
  3. Žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma SD: Rev. Mod. Phys.. 2004, 76: 323. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323View Article
  4. Miah MI: Mater. Lett.. 2006, 66: 2863. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.014View Article
  5. Lou X, Adelmann C, Crooker CA, Garlid ES, Zhang J, Reddy KSM, Flexner SD, Palmstrøm CJ, Crowell PA: Nat. Phys.. 2007, 3: 197. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsVyku7c%3D] 10.1038/nphys543View Article
  6. Miah MI: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2008, 92: 092104. Bibcode number [2008ApPhL..92i2104M] Bibcode number [2008ApPhL..92i2104M] 10.1063/1.2885735View Article
  7. Hägele D, Oestreich M, Rühle WW, Nestle N, Eberl K: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1998, 73: 1580. Bibcode number [1998ApPhL..73.1580H] Bibcode number [1998ApPhL..73.1580H] 10.1063/1.122210View Article
  8. Sanada H, Arata I, Ohno Y, Chen Z, Kayanuma K, Oka Y, Matsukura F, Ohno H: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2002, 81: 2788. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnsFyqu7k%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..81.2788S] 10.1063/1.1512818View Article
  9. Sanada H, Arata I, Ohno Y, Chen Z, Kayanuma K, Oka Y, Matsukura F, Ohno H: J. Supercond. Incorpor. Novel Magn.. 2003, 16: 217. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXis1CntLc%3D] 10.1023/A:1023206817511
  10. Polland H-J, Schultheis L, Kuhl J, Gobel EO, Tu CW: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1985, 55: 2610. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL28Xis1Citw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1985PhRvL..55.2610P] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2610View Article
  11. Kheng K, Cox RT, Merle d’Aubigne Y, Bassani F, Saminadayar K, Tatarenko S: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1993, 71: 1752. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXmvVWhsb8%3D]; Bibcode number [1993PhRvL..71.1752K] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1752View Article
  12. Tackeuchi A, Wada O, Nishikawa Y: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1997, 70: 1131. Bibcode number [1997ApPhL..70.1131T] Bibcode number [1997ApPhL..70.1131T] 10.1063/1.118506View Article
  13. Hall KC, Leonard SW, van Driel HM, Kost AR, Selvig E, Chow DH: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1999, 75: 3665. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnsFyrt74%3D] 10.1063/1.125422View Article
  14. Pikus GE, Titkov AN: In Optical Orientation (Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Science). North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1984.
  15. Maialle MZ, de Andrada e Silva EA, Sham LJ: Phys. Rev. B. 1993, 47: 15776. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXksFyntbo%3D]; Bibcode number [1993PhRvB..4715776M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.15776View Article
  16. Kityk IV, Nyk M, Strek W, Jablonski JM, Misiewicz J: J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2005, 17: 5235. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtF2ks7nE]; Bibcode number [2005JPCM...17.5235K] 10.1088/0953-8984/17/34/008View Article
  17. Dzhioev RI, Korenev VL, Zakharchenya BP, Gammon D, Bracker AS, Tischler JG, Katzer DS: Phys. Rev. B. 2002, 66: 153409. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..66o3409D] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..66o3409D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.153409View Article
  18. Motsnyi VF, Dorpe PV, Roy WV, Goovaerts E, Safarov VI, Borghs G, Boeck JD: Phys. Rev. B. 2003, 68: 245319. Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..68x5319M] Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..68x5319M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245319View Article
  19. Kalevich VK, Zakharchchenya BP, Kavokin KV, Petrov AV, Le Jeune P, Marie X, Robart D, Amand T, Barrau J, Brouseau M: Phys. Solid State. 1997, 39: 681. Bibcode number [1997PhSS...39..681K] Bibcode number [1997PhSS...39..681K] 10.1134/1.1129913View Article
  20. Ivchenko EL, Kiselev AA: Sov. Phys. Semicond.. 1992, 26: 827.
  21. Malinowski A, Harley RT: Phys. Rev. B. 2000, 62: 2051. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXkvVelsrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2000PhRvB..62.2051M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.2051View Article
  22. Porras-Montenegro N, Duque CA, Reyes-Gómez E, Oliveira LE: J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2008, 20: 465220. Bibcode number [2008JPCM...20T5220P] Bibcode number [2008JPCM...20T5220P] 10.1088/0953-8984/20/46/465220View Article
  23. Dyakonov M, Marie X, Amand T, Le Jeune P, Robart D, Brousseau M, Barrau J: Phys. Rev. B. 1997, 56: 10412. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmvFWqtbY%3D]; Bibcode number [1997PhRvB..5610412D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10412View Article
  24. Hagele D, Hubner J, Ruhle WW, Oestreich M: Solid State Commun.. 2001, 120: 73. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXms12iu78%3D]; Bibcode number [2001SSCom.120...73H] 10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00346-5View Article
  25. I.A. Yugova, I.Ya. Gerlovin, V.G. Davydov, I.V. Ignatiev, I.E. Kozin, H.W. Ren, M. Sugisaki, S. Sugou, Y. Masumoto, Phys. Rev. B 66, 235312 (2002)View Article

Copyright

© to the authors 2009