# Photo-Induced Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Quantum Wells

- M Idrish Miah
^{1, 2, 3}Email author

**4**:385

**DOI: **10.1007/s11671-008-9241-2

© to the authors 2009

**Received: **14 November 2008

**Accepted: **30 December 2008

**Published: **17 January 2009

## Abstract

We experimentally investigate the dynamics of spins in GaAs quantum wells under applied electric bias by photoluminescence (PL) measurements excited with circularly polarized light. The bias-dependent circular polarization of PL (*P*_{PL}) with and without magnetic field is studied. The*P*_{PL}without magnetic field is found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing the strength of the negative bias. However,*P*_{PL}in a transverse magnetic field shows oscillations under an electric bias, indicating that the precession of electron spin occurs in quantum wells. The results are discussed based on the electron–hole exchange interaction in the electric field.

### Keywords

Photoluminescence Spin transport Exchange interaction## Introduction

Possibility of using information carried by the spin of the electron in electronic devices, in addition to its charge, has gained a lot of attention since the discovery of long spin lifetimes in semiconductor structures [1], leading to the growth of the field spintronics [1–3]. This may lead to new devices beyond well-established storage or memory applications, already implemented as giant magnetoresistance (GMR) read-heads and nonvolatile magnetic RAM (MRAM) [2].

One of the major hurdles in the development of spintronic devices has been the problem of efficiently injecting spin-polarized carriers into a semiconductor, transporting them over reasonable distances without spin-flipping and then detecting them. Much effort [3] has thus been spent in understanding the transport and dynamics of spins and the generation/injection and detection of spin currents in semiconductors. Generation of spin polarization usually means creating a nonequilibrium spin population. This has been achieved in various ways, e.g. by optical techniques, or by magnetic semiconductors or ferromagnetic contacts, with varying degrees of success [3]. Although the detection of spin current in semiconductors was previously been achieved mainly through optical methods [1], an electrical means of detecting spin current has been obtained recently [4–6]. Despite many efforts and substantial progress, a further major obstacle to the practical implementation of spintronics is the lack of a proper understanding of spin transport and dynamics in semiconductor-based heterostructures [3].

In this paper, we focus on spin dynamics in GaAs quantum wells (QWs) under applied electric bias by photoluminescence (PL) measurements excited with circularly polarized light [7–9]. We study the bias-dependent circular polarization of PL (*P*_{PL}) with and without magnetic field. The *P*_{PL} without magnetic field is found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing bias. However, *P*_{PL} in a transverse magnetic field shows oscillations under an applied bias, indicating that the precession of electron spin occurs in QWs. The results are discussed by exploring the possible roles played in the observed phenomena.

## Experimental

_{0.3}Ga

_{0.7}As barrier. The samples were grown on the Si-doped GaAs substrate. For the application of the external bias (field normal to the heterostructure layers), the top surface of the sample was coated with a semitransparent electrode (Au). We excited the sample by circularly polarized ps pulses of a tunable Ti: sapphire laser with a repetition rate of 76 MHz and measured the PL both in zero magnetic field and in a magnetic field (5 T) aligned perpendicular to the growth axis of the structure (Voigt geometry) using a streak camera. The PL was excited directly to the exciton absorption band and was detected with the small long-wavelength shift to minimize the polarization losses [10, 11]. The exciting beam was directed perpendicular to the magnetic field direction, and the PL was detected in the backward direction. A schema of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. All the measurements were done at liquid helium (LH) temperature by placing the samples in a cryostat. The degree of circular polarization (

*P*

_{PL}) was calculated by defining it as the ratio of the difference of the signals of the right and left circularly polarized PL to their sum.

## Results and Discussion

*P*

_{PL}has a small slow component with the decay time 1 ns dominated by a fast component characterized by the decay time below 0.1 ns, in consistence with other observations [12, 13]. When a negative bias is applied to the top electrode of the sample, the amplitude of the slow component increases and, for the applied bias, this component predominates.

One more mechanisms of the relaxation of the excitonic spin oriented by the light might be possible. Relaxation can result in the PL depolarization due to a flip of the exciton spin as a whole or independent flips of the electron and hole spins [14]. In the first case, the decay time of the *P*_{PL} is directly determined by the exciton spin relaxation rate [15]. If the carrier spins relax independently, the fast flip of the hole spin does not affect the *P*_{PL}. In this case, the decay of the *P*_{PL} is controlled by the relaxation of the long-lived electron spin. The above analysis reveals that the bias-induced changes in the polarized PL kinetics are related to transition from dynamics of the exciton spin to that of independent electron and hole spins. In the absence of the bias, the exchange coupling exceeds the spin–phonon interaction [16], and the main relaxation mechanism is given by the exciton spin flips, as mentioned above.

In the presence of the applied bias, the electric field reduces the electron–hole exchange coupling by spatially separating the charges, and as a result, the interaction of the hole spin with phonons becomes stronger than the exchange interaction. This leads to a breakage of the coupling between the electron and hole spins. As a consequence, the hole spin exhibits fast relaxation, while the electron spin holds its orientation, providing the slow component in the *P*_{PL} decay. The decay time as measured at −2.5 V is 1 ns, which agrees with the literature value [17].

*P*

_{PL}in the presence of the applied magnetic field for zero and −2.5 V bias. As can be seen, the effect of the bias on the polarized PL kinetics of the QWs appears to be more pronounced in the presence of the transverse

*H*. For the −2.5 V bias, the polarization kinetics shows distinct oscillations symmetric with respect to the horizontal axis. An analysis of the

*P*

_{PL}dynamics in

*H*gives additional evidence for the exchange interaction suppression in an external electric field. In the presence of the bias, the hole spin rapidly relaxes and its projection onto the direction of observation varies. Being uncoupled with the hole spin, the electronic spin may freely precess around the magnetic field direction. The projection of the electron spin onto the direction of observation oscillates in time with the Larmor frequency

*ω*

_{L}=

*g*μ

_{B}

*H*/ℏ [18], where μ

_{B}is the Bohr magneton,

*g*is the electron-

*g*factor and ℏ is the reduced Planck constant. The

*P*

_{PL}should oscillate between +1 (100%) and −1 with the same frequency [19] because, when the hole spin has no preferential orientation, this quantity is determined only by the projection of the electron spin.

As can also be seen from Fig. 4, the oscillation amplitude is initially equal to ~0.8 and slowly decays with time. The data can be fitted by the exponentially damping harmonic function
which gives *ω*_{L} = 0.1 THz and the decay time *τ* = 200 ps for the −2.5 V bias and *H* = 5 T. The obtained oscillation frequency *ω*_{L} corresponds to the value *g* = 22.7 × 10^{−2}. This agrees with the experimental as well as theoretical estimates of the transverse electron g-factor in GaAs QWs [20–22].

In the absence of the bias, there involves only the behaviour of the exciton spin as a whole. The *H* mixes the excitonic states, and as a result, the right circularly polarized light becomes capable of exciting several states. The kinetics of the polarized PL is controlled here by the interference of the states of the exciton fine structure split by the combined action of the magnetic field and exchange coupling induced by the external electric field [23, 24]. As Fig. 4a demonstrates, the *P*_{PL} varies with time in a rather complicated fashion of the PL polarization kinetics [25], reflecting superposition of the beats at several frequencies. From the above discussion, one can conclude that application of the bias to the QWs weakens the exchange interaction between the electron and hole spins.

## Conclusion

The dynamics of spins in GaAs QWs under applied electric bias has been experimentally investigated by PL measurements. The bias-dependent*P*_{PL}with and without magnetic field was studied. The*P*_{PL}without magnetic field was found to be decayed with an enhancement of increasing negative bias. However,*P*_{PL}in a transverse magnetic field showed oscillations under an applied bias. The oscillation amplitude was found to be increased with increasing the strength of the bias. The results were discussed based on the electron–hole exchange interaction in the electric field.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- D.D. Awschalom, D. Loss, N. Samarth (ed.), Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer, Berlin, 2002)Google Scholar
- Prinz GA:
*Science*. 1998,**282:**1660. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnslGhsLs%3D] 10.1126/science.282.5394.1660View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma SD:
*Rev. Mod. Phys.*. 2004,**76:**323. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Miah MI:
*Mater. Lett.*. 2006,**66:**2863. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lou X, Adelmann C, Crooker CA, Garlid ES, Zhang J, Reddy KSM, Flexner SD, Palmstrøm CJ, Crowell PA:
*Nat. Phys.*. 2007,**3:**197. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsVyku7c%3D] 10.1038/nphys543View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Miah MI:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 2008,**92:**092104. Bibcode number [2008ApPhL..92i2104M] Bibcode number [2008ApPhL..92i2104M] 10.1063/1.2885735View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hägele D, Oestreich M, Rühle WW, Nestle N, Eberl K:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 1998,**73:**1580. Bibcode number [1998ApPhL..73.1580H] Bibcode number [1998ApPhL..73.1580H] 10.1063/1.122210View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sanada H, Arata I, Ohno Y, Chen Z, Kayanuma K, Oka Y, Matsukura F, Ohno H:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 2002,**81:**2788. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnsFyqu7k%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..81.2788S] 10.1063/1.1512818View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sanada H, Arata I, Ohno Y, Chen Z, Kayanuma K, Oka Y, Matsukura F, Ohno H:
*J. Supercond. Incorpor. Novel Magn.*. 2003,**16:**217. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXis1CntLc%3D] 10.1023/A:1023206817511Google Scholar - Polland H-J, Schultheis L, Kuhl J, Gobel EO, Tu CW:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 1985,**55:**2610. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL28Xis1Citw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1985PhRvL..55.2610P] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2610View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kheng K, Cox RT, Merle d’Aubigne Y, Bassani F, Saminadayar K, Tatarenko S:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 1993,**71:**1752. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXmvVWhsb8%3D]; Bibcode number [1993PhRvL..71.1752K] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1752View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Tackeuchi A, Wada O, Nishikawa Y:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 1997,**70:**1131. Bibcode number [1997ApPhL..70.1131T] Bibcode number [1997ApPhL..70.1131T] 10.1063/1.118506View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hall KC, Leonard SW, van Driel HM, Kost AR, Selvig E, Chow DH:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 1999,**75:**3665. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnsFyrt74%3D] 10.1063/1.125422View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pikus GE, Titkov AN:
*In Optical Orientation (Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Science)*. North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1984.Google Scholar - Maialle MZ, de Andrada e Silva EA, Sham LJ:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 1993,**47:**15776. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXksFyntbo%3D]; Bibcode number [1993PhRvB..4715776M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.15776View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kityk IV, Nyk M, Strek W, Jablonski JM, Misiewicz J:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter*. 2005,**17:**5235. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtF2ks7nE]; Bibcode number [2005JPCM...17.5235K] 10.1088/0953-8984/17/34/008View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dzhioev RI, Korenev VL, Zakharchenya BP, Gammon D, Bracker AS, Tischler JG, Katzer DS:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2002,**66:**153409. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..66o3409D] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..66o3409D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.153409View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Motsnyi VF, Dorpe PV, Roy WV, Goovaerts E, Safarov VI, Borghs G, Boeck JD:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2003,**68:**245319. Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..68x5319M] Bibcode number [2003PhRvB..68x5319M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245319View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kalevich VK, Zakharchchenya BP, Kavokin KV, Petrov AV, Le Jeune P, Marie X, Robart D, Amand T, Barrau J, Brouseau M:
*Phys. Solid State*. 1997,**39:**681. Bibcode number [1997PhSS...39..681K] Bibcode number [1997PhSS...39..681K] 10.1134/1.1129913View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ivchenko EL, Kiselev AA:
*Sov. Phys. Semicond.*. 1992,**26:**827.Google Scholar - Malinowski A, Harley RT:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 2000,**62:**2051. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXkvVelsrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2000PhRvB..62.2051M] 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.2051View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Porras-Montenegro N, Duque CA, Reyes-Gómez E, Oliveira LE:
*J. Phys. Condens. Matter*. 2008,**20:**465220. Bibcode number [2008JPCM...20T5220P] Bibcode number [2008JPCM...20T5220P] 10.1088/0953-8984/20/46/465220View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dyakonov M, Marie X, Amand T, Le Jeune P, Robart D, Brousseau M, Barrau J:
*Phys. Rev. B*. 1997,**56:**10412. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmvFWqtbY%3D]; Bibcode number [1997PhRvB..5610412D] 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10412View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hagele D, Hubner J, Ruhle WW, Oestreich M:
*Solid State Commun.*. 2001,**120:**73. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXms12iu78%3D]; Bibcode number [2001SSCom.120...73H] 10.1016/S0038-1098(01)00346-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar - I.A. Yugova, I.Ya. Gerlovin, V.G. Davydov, I.V. Ignatiev, I.E. Kozin, H.W. Ren, M. Sugisaki, S. Sugou, Y. Masumoto, Phys. Rev. B 66, 235312 (2002)View ArticleGoogle Scholar