Continuous and Localized Mn Implantation of ZnO
© to the authors 2009
Received: 25 January 2009
Accepted: 24 April 2009
Published: 9 May 2009
We present results derived from continuous and localized 35 keV55Mn+ion implantations into ZnO. Localized implantations were carried out by using self-ordered alumina membranes as masks leading to ordered arrays of implanted volumes on the substrate surfaces. Defects and vacancies in the small implantation volumes of ZnO were generated due to the implantation processes besides the creation of new phases. Rapid thermal annealing was applied in the case of continuous implantation. The samples were characterized by HRSEM, GIXRD, Raman spectroscopy and RBS/C. Magnetic characterization of the samples pointed out appreciable differences among the samples obtained by the different implantation methods. This fact was mainly attributed to the different volume/surface ratios present in the implanted zones as well as to the increase of Mn atom concentrations along the grain frontiers in the nanostructured surfaces. The samples also showed a ferromagnetic transition phase at temperature value higher than room temperature.
KeywordsIon implantation Nanoporous anodic alumina Magnetic semiconductors Magnetic properties ZnO
Since the prediction of room temperature ferromagnetism in Mn:ZnO [1, 2] there has been great efforts to obtain this material, especially nanostructures, using a wide variety of strategies from the well-known material growth techniques to novel deposition and implantation methods [3–6]. The presence of ferromagnetism in this kind of materials was firstly claimed by Sharma et al. , while other authors founded spin glass, or simply non-magnetic behavior . Previous works on Mn:ZnO pointed out different key factors determining the magnetic response of these novel materials, such as structural and composition changes, and atomic shared surfaces [8–10]. However, the existence of metastable phases  as a result of ion implantation processes can be a feasible explanation of such magnetic behavior. One of the most accepted hypotheses establishes that Mn atoms with different oxidation states sharing surfaces with intermediate O atoms are responsible of the observed magnetism. According to that, particularly in thin films, the shared surface between Mn atoms at the grain boundaries of different phases is a key condition to obtain ferromagnetic coupling. It is therefore reasonable to expect an enhanced ferromagnetic behavior in materials where the Mn atoms are arranged in a structure with a high surface to volume ratio. Theoretically, this ferromagnetism is carrier mediated and thus the control of Mn atoms in sub-micrometric confined volumes of ZnO matrixes is an important issue.
Experimental works on ion implantation of different atomic species into micrometric confined volumes  have shown that different diffusion and clustering properties of the implanted species may exist compared to continuum film implantation. The ion implantation processes usually give place to the generation of vacancies and point defects in crystalline matrixes, which strongly affect the carrier transport. In the particular case of Mn implanted ZnO, an anomalous creation of Zn interstitials has been studied 20 years ago  and, more recently, it has been reported that even non-doped ZnO nanostructures can show ferromagnetism  due to special arrangement of Zn and O atoms within ZnO crystalline structure confined into porous anodic alumina (PAA).
In this work first results following a new strategy of Mn:ZnO fabrication are presented. The objective is to elaborate a nanostructured array of implanted Mn:ZnO thin film using ZnO bulk single crystals as substrates, in order to study the effect of continuum versus localized ion implantation on the structural and magnetic properties. The Mn ion implantation into ZnO crystals surfaces is here performed by a continuum (i.e. conventional) method and, in addition, by using highly ordered self-assembly PAA membranes as implantation masks . In the latter case, it is expected that the shared surface where Mn atoms have been implanted will increase and therefore an enhanced magnetic responses should be observed compared to the former implantation method.
Sample labels, obtained GIXRD results, crystalline phases, and estimated grain sizes of implanted samples
Main Bragg reflections
Mean grain size (nm)
Continuum implanted annealed
The samples were examined with high resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) using a Jeol Microscopy mod. JSM 6335F, micro-Raman spectroscopy with a HRLabRam spectrometer attached to a metallographic microscope. The excitation was done with a He–Ne laser line at 633 nm and grazing incidence (0.5°) X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) patterns were also received from Panalytical mod. X’Pert Pro, due to the special characteristics of M1 type of samples, the employed time in these measurements were 6 times longer compared to rest of samples types. In addition, random and channeling Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS/C) was performed with 2 MeV4He+ions, backscattering angle 167°, in order to establish the experimental Mn distribution and damage profiles. The magnetic properties were determined in a superconductive quantum interference device (SQUID) before RBS measurements in order to not alter the magnetic response of samples. Magnetization as a function of temperature was measured under 1 kOe parallel to surface applied field from 4 to 300 K. Hysteresis loops were measured at the extreme temperature values.
Results and Discussion
Continuum Implanted Samples
For the C1 and C2 samples the measurements in RBS random geometry show that the Mn signal appears at about the same channel position as it was obtained in RBS channeling geometry. No significant modifications of the Mn atoms concentration profiles could be observed in both type of measurements. However, the yield of the Zn atoms decreased beyond channel 427 compared to the random level in the case of virgin samples C0. This fact indicates a diminution of the Zn atoms concentration from the surface to a maximum depth of approximately 80 nm. This decrease in the Zn atoms concentration is attributed to the increasing Mn atom concentration in that zone. Part of the Zn atoms are displaced to deeper locations, and it has previously been reported that Zn suffers anomalous displacement as interstitials defects .
Crystalline structure variations in the C1 samples compared to the C0 type due to the ion implantation were registered in the GIXRD and micro-Raman spectra, but no signal indicating Mn clustering was detected. The damages in the crystalline ordering can be summarized by the changes of the main crystallographic orientations detected in addition to the appearance of significant features that can be associated to the incipient formation of ZnMnO3 or related crystalline phases. Although these phases were not identified from the micro-Raman analysis, the broadband displayed in the Raman spectra could reinforce the affirmation of the creation of a damaged zone with oxygen vacancies and/or Zn atom interstitials [25, 26]. The Raman spectra of the C2 samples have similar features as the C0 samples. For C2 samples the GIXRD spectra show an amorphous halo, which means that RTA induced only partial re-crystallization of the damaged zone followed by an increase of the grain size. The appearance of clear diffraction peaks in C2 spectra associated to ZnO and ZnMnO3 phases, which were not detected in C0 and C1, can be attributed to the rearrangement of the Zn displaced atoms and the growing of texturized ZnMnO3 as most probable compound. ZnO distorted signals were detected both in the GIXRD and micro-Raman spectra from C2 samples. The ZnMnO3 XRD peaks were also detected in GIXRD spectra of these samples but this phase was not registered in micro-Raman spectrum obtained from C2 samples. This fact may be associated to Zn1–xMn x O un-reacting metastable phase, which have been reported at temperatures lower than 750 °C , far from the detection limit of micro-Raman technique or a substitutional Mn:ZnO phase.
Masked Implanted Samples
HRSEM images of M1 samples displayed a noticeable ordered pattern of hexagonal symmetry at the surface, see Fig. 1d. This pattern is a consequence of the masking effect of the PAA during the ion implantation. In addition to sputtering of the substrate, the mask may also be subjected to some sputtering. There might even be some re-deposition of mask and substrate material. A simple TRIM estimation (assuming amorphous ZnO) gives a sputter depth of roughly 50 nm for the applied fluence, although this value is probably overestimated for a crystalline material. There is no clear evidence from the RBS results of C1 that there is such high sputtering depth. It should be noted that no signals from masks elements (Al and P) were detected with the employed techniques.
The GIXRD diffraction patterns of M1 samples presented similar features compared to that received from C1 samples, Fig. 3b. Nonetheless, the M1 sample diffractogram clearly reflected the existence of a peak associated to <100> ZnO. The existence of this peak can be assigned to the non-implanted zones of ZnO substrate between the pores of PAA, which are affected by surrounding stresses from the implanted zones. The calculated grain size for <511> ZnMnO3 in M1 samples was smaller than in C1 and C2. This effect may be ascribed to different diffusion mechanisms in the localized implanted volumes, as previously observed by Sun et al.  following restricted Au implantation into TiO2.
Raman spectra of the M1 samples also reflected similarities to those obtained for C1 samples. The observed broadband ranging from 506 to 599 cm−1also point out the same implantation effects as in C1 type. However, the slightly lower intensity of this band points out a smaller damaged volume than that detected in C1 samples in accordance with the smaller volume affected by ion implantation. We have assumed that the induced damage volume and Mn atoms profile is similar to that in the continuum implanted sample, and the nanostructure of M1 samples is approximated by an array of discs with a diameter of 280 nm. We define the thickness of the discs as the combined width of the Mn distribution and the surrounding affected damaged volume, which from the RBS data can be around 50 nm.
Magnetic properties of the different samples measured at 4 K and 300 K
Magnetization values versus temperature between 4 and 300 K are shown in Fig. 6c, after subtraction of the linear diamagnetic contribution from raw data and normalized to magnetization value at 4.2 K. In these curves a clear change at 275 K in all implanted samples can be observed. When the temperature is increased, the magnetization values suffer an abrupt decreasing at 275 K, which can be associated to magnetic phase changes. These changes become much clearer from the derivate of M(T) plotted in Fig. 5d for all samples. The most noticeable dips are seen in the M1 and C2 samples at 275 K. The observation of hysteresis loop for this temperature indicates the presence of a common ferromagnetic phase in all samples having a Curie temperature (TC) higher than 300 K.
The presence of a hysteretic behavior, at 4 and 300 K, can be associated to ferromagnetism, although alternative cooperative magnetic interactions can be argued , such as ferrimagnetism or antiferromagnetism in coexistence with ferromagnetism. The observed magnetic response can be explained in terms of multiphase system where the existence and interaction of diverse compounds and metastable phases are given as it was indicated by the structural characterization.
A starting point for this explanation would be to identify a phase with a TC at 275 K and to rule out those for which their TC does not fit with 275 K. The explanation of the observed magnetic response might be ascribed to diverse manganese oxides , e.g., MnO, Mn2O3 and MnO2, which are well known to be antiferromagnetic below the Néel temperature of 116, 100 and 84 K, respectively, and bulk Mn3O4 exhibiting ferromagnetism with TC = 42 K. Magnetic behavior of several transition metal-ZnO spinels have recently been reported , with TC lower than 275 K being the temperature at which a magnetic phase change occurs in our samples. However, ZnMnO3 has a TC higher than 300 K , so the formation of this phase explains the hysteretic response at 300 K observed for all samples and its relative abundance might explain the different Ms values at 300 K, for the different sample.
The observed magnetic ordering at temperatures lower than 275 K can be explained by assuming that part of the Mn atoms form non-ferromagnetic compounds  but with different magnetic susceptibility from ZnO, and that the other part of Mn atoms participate in (1) a short range indirect exchange and (2) a double exchange mechanisms . In the first case, the magnetic interaction results in antiferro- or ferromagnetic ordering, whereas in the second case it results in ferromagnetic coupling. These mechanisms have been reported for systems where there are highly shared surfaces, e.g. thin multilayers [8–10] and the Mn atoms present different oxidation states. Our systems have similar characteristics to those mentioned above. There is a high ratio between Mn atoms situated on shared surfaces, at grain boundaries and atoms inside those grains of polycrystalline implanted volumes. This ratio is higher in masked implanted samples than in not masked ones. The high Ms per implanted Mn atom fits well with that obtained by Norberg et al.  for thin nanocrystalline films. This fact reinforce the idea referred to that the magnetism appearing in all theses structures is originated by Mn atoms with different oxidation states situated at the grain boundaries of different phases.
On the other hand, the confirmed partial recovering of the crystalline ordering in the annealed sample is also responsible for a local arrangement of ions and therefore of different magnetic responses. The existence of defects and vacancies are key factors for the magnetic behavior of doped ZnO [3, 30]. In our case, there are no definitive and clear evidences of substitutional Mn; however, the existence of O vacancies and Zn defects, the last ones detected by RBS, induced by the ion implantation process in ZnO, plays an important role. For example, the O vacancies favor antiferromagnetism and Zn defects contribute to ferromagnetism , but also these vacancies and defects change the magnetic permeability from original ZnO. M1 and C1 samples reflected more damaged crystalline structure than C2 type. Thus, it can be assumed that in those samples, the enhanced magnetic response per Mn atom is highly influenced by the partial loss of crystalline order, the existence of associated defects and also by participation of more Mn atoms on the grain boundaries compared to C2 sample. Inclusive, the even higher participation of Mn atoms located at grain boundaries in M1 samples makes the magnetic response in this sample higher than in C1 sample.
Manganese ions of 35 keV have been successfully implanted into ZnO. The ion implantations were carried out, both in a conventional way (yielding a continuous thin layer), and locally through the pores of a PAA. In the latter case, a nanostructured surface with surface/volume ratio higher than that achieved in the continuous implanted samples was obtained improving the magnetic response.
Differences in the structure after implantation and RTA were detected and associated to preferential crystalline planes and changes in grain sizes at the nanometric scale. RTA in O2atmosphere partially recovered the crystalline order, but did not indicate an appreciable diffusion of Mn atoms in the ZnO matrix. Structural results indicated a probable recrystallization processes and the existence of metastable phases even after RTA. The analyzed magnetic responses suggest cooperative interactions between these phases which increase the values of the saturation magnetization. The activation temperature of the detected magnetic phases at 275 K does not correspond to those previously reported for Mn and Zn–Mn oxides, in accordance with the observed structural results. The origin of room temperature ferromagnetism has been associated to ZnMnO3as the most probable compound.
The higher values ofHcin the locally implanted sample were ascribed to shape anisotropy. The increasing numbers of Mn atoms participating in the magnetic interaction due to the increased shared surfaces at grain boundaries and the generated defects by the ion implantation improve the quality of the magnetic response in masked sample compared to the continuum implanted one. The techniques reported here may be useful for designing new fabrication methods for nanostructured devices or to induce high concentration levels of impurities and defects in confined volumes.
We are grateful to P. Fernández and J.L. Baldonedo, Universidad Complutense, for help with the ion implantations and SEM pictures. This work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Education under Grant MAT2007-6042. J. Jensen thanks the Carl Tryggers Foundation (Sweden) for financial support.
- Dietl T, Ohno H, Matsukura F, Cibert J, Ferrand D: Science. 2000, 287: 1019. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtFyksbY%3D]; Bibcode number [2000Sci...287.1019D] 10.1126/science.287.5455.1019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sato K, Katayama-Yoshida H: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.. 2001,40(Part 2):L334. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXivFKjs70%3D]; Bibcode number [2001JaJAP..40..334S] 10.1143/JJAP.40.L334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jagadish C, Pearton S (Eds): Zinc Oxide Bulk, Thin Films and Nanostructures: Processing, Properties and Applications. Elsvier, Amsterdam; 2006.Google Scholar
- Wang JB, Huang GJ, Zhong XL, Sun LZ, Zhou YC, Liu EH: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2006, 88: 252502. Bibcode number [2006ApPhL..88y2502W] Bibcode number [2006ApPhL..88y2502W] 10.1063/1.2208564View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Norberg NS, Kittilstved KR, Amonette JE, Kukkadapu RK, Schwartz DA, Gamelin DR: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004, 126: 9387. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlsF2mtbY%3D] 10.1021/ja048427jView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mia WB, Bai HL, Liu H, Sun CQ: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 101: 023904. Bibcode number [2007JAP...101b3904M] Bibcode number [2007JAP...101b3904M] 10.1063/1.2426377View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma VK, Varmaa GD: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 102: 056105. Bibcode number [2007JAP...102e6105S] Bibcode number [2007JAP...102e6105S] 10.1063/1.2778283View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darshan C, Kundaliya C, Ogale SB, Lofland SE, Dhar S, Metting CJ, Shinde SR, Ma Z, Varughese B, Ramanujachary KV, Salamanca-Riba L, Venkatesan T: Nat. Mater.. 2005, 3: 709.Google Scholar
- García MA, Ruiz-González ML, Quesada A, Costa-Krämer JL, Fernández JF, Khatib SJ, Wennberg A, Caballero AC, Martín-González MS, Villegas M, Briones F, González-Calbet JM, Hernando A: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2005, 94: 217206. Bibcode number [2005PhRvL..94u7206G] Bibcode number [2005PhRvL..94u7206G] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.217206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Céspedes E, Garcia-López J, García-Hernández M, de Andrés A, Prieto C: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 102: 033907. Bibcode number [2007JAP...102c3907C] Bibcode number [2007JAP...102c3907C] 10.1063/1.2764207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun K, Zhu S, Fromknecht R, Linker G, Wang LM: Mater. Lett.. 2004, 58: 547. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmtlOl] 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00559-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sonder E, Zuhr RA, Valiga RE: J. Appl. Phys.. 1988, 64: 1140. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXlvVSktrs%3D]; Bibcode number [1988JAP....64.1140S] 10.1063/1.341875View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yi JB, Pan H, Lin JY, Ding J, Feng YP, Thongmee S, Liu T, Gong H, Wang L: Adv. Mater.. 2008, 20: 1170. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlt1Wmuro%3D] 10.1002/adma.200702387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura M, Nigo S, Kishimoto N: Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn.. 2008, 33: 1101.Google Scholar
- Sanz R, Johansson A, Skupinski M, Jensen J, Possnert G, Boman M, Vazquez M, Hjort K: Nano Lett.. 2006, 6: 1065. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjvVWns78%3D]; Bibcode number [2006NanoL...6.1065S] 10.1021/nl0602185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-Vélez M: Thin Solid Films. 2006, 495: 51. Bibcode number [2006TSF...495...51H] Bibcode number [2006TSF...495...51H] 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.331View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanz R, Jensen J, Johansson A, Skupinski M, Possnert G, Boman M, Hernandez-Vélez M, Vazquez M, Hjort K: Nanotechnology. 2007, 18: 305303. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305303View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin SW, Lee SG, Lee J, Whang CN, Lee J-H, Choi I-H, Kim TG, Song JH: Nanotechnology. 2005, 16: 1396. Bibcode number [2005Nanot..16.1392S] Bibcode number [2005Nanot..16.1392S] 10.1088/0957-4484/16/8/070View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calleja JM, Cardona M: Phys. Rev. B. 1997, 16: 3753. Bibcode number [1977PhRvB..16.3753C] Bibcode number [1977PhRvB..16.3753C] 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.3753View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cuscó R, Alarcón-Lladó E, Ibáñez J, Artús L, Jiménez J, Wang B, Callahan MJ: Phys. Rev. B. 2007, 75: 165202. Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..75p5202C] Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..75p5202C] 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Artús L, Cuscó R, Alarcón-Lladó E, González-Díaz G, Mártil I, Jiménez J, Wang B, Callahan MJ: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2007, 90: 181911. Bibcode number [2007ApPhL..90r1911A] Bibcode number [2007ApPhL..90r1911A] 10.1063/1.2734474View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen ZQ, Kawasuso A, Xu Y, Naramoto H, Yuan XL, Sekiguchi T, Suzuki R, Ohdaira T: J. Appl. Phys.. 2005, 97: 013528. Bibcode number [2005JAP....97a3528C] Bibcode number [2005JAP....97a3528C] 10.1063/1.1821636View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu J, Xing H, Zhao Q, Mao H, Shen Y, Wang J, Lai Z, Zhu Z: Solid State Commun.. 2006, 138: 502. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XltlehsLo%3D]; Bibcode number [2006SSCom.138..502Y] 10.1016/j.ssc.2006.04.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Venkataraj S, Ohashi N, Sakaguchi I, Adachi Y, Ohgaki T, Ryoken H, Haneda H: J. Appl. Phys.. 2007, 102: 014905. Bibcode number [2007JAP...102a4905V] Bibcode number [2007JAP...102a4905V] 10.1063/1.2752123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buciuman F, Patcas F, Craciun R, Zahn Dietrich RT: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.. 1999, 1: 185. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtV2ju7o%3D] 10.1039/a807821aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Handley RC: Modern Magnetic Materials: Principles and Applications. Wiley, New York; 2000.Google Scholar
- Wohlfarth EP: Ferromagnetic Materials: A Handbook on the Properties of Magnetically Ordered Substances. North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam; 1982.Google Scholar
- Blasco J, García J: J. Solid State Chem.. 2006, 179: 2199. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmtVShtbg%3D]; Bibcode number [2006JSSCh.179.2199B] 10.1016/j.jssc.2006.04.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou S, et al.: J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.. 2008, 41: 105011. Bibcode number [2008JPhD...41j5011Z] Bibcode number [2008JPhD...41j5011Z] 10.1088/0022-3727/41/10/105011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosa AL, Ahuja RJ: J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2007, 19: 386232. Bibcode number [2007JPCM...19L6232R] Bibcode number [2007JPCM...19L6232R] 10.1088/0953-8984/19/38/386232View ArticleGoogle Scholar