Open Access

Enzymatic Digestion of Single DNA Molecules Anchored on Nanogold-Modified Surfaces

Nanoscale Research Letters20094:1029

DOI: 10.1007/s11671-009-9350-6

Received: 9 January 2009

Accepted: 14 May 2009

Published: 31 May 2009


To study enzyme–DNA interactions at single molecular level, both the attachment points and the immediate surroundings of surfaces must be carefully considered such that they do not compromise the structural information and biological properties of the sample under investigation. The present work demonstrates the feasibility of enzymatic digestion of single DNA molecules attached to nanoparticle-modified surfaces. With Nanogold linking DNA to the mica surface by electrostatic interactions, advantageous conditions with fewer effects on the length and topography of DNA are obtained, and an appropriate environment for the activities of DNA is created. We demonstrate that by using Dip-Pen Nanolithography, individual DNA molecules attached to modified mica surfaces can be efficiently digested by DNase I.


Gold nanoparticles Mica DNA Atomic force microscopy Dip-Pen Nanolithography


Advances in single-molecule techniques make it possible to explore new phenomena and unravel novel mechanisms in biology that were largely inaccessible by traditional bulk measurements [1]. For example, studies of DNA–protein interaction at single molecular level could characterize the distributions of molecular properties and observe the temporal evolution of complicated reaction pathways [2]. It is generally understood that single-molecule measurements require adsorption and fixation of single DNA molecules on a solid support surface [1, 3] before the protein motion along the DNA can be tracked. Among the many kinds of substrate surfaces, mica is ideal because of its atomic smoothness. Since newly cleaved mica is negatively charged at basic pH [4], an advisable surface modification is critical to bind the negatively charged phosphate backbone of DNA. Typically, poly-l-lysine [5, 6], silane [7, 8], and divalent cations, such as Ni2+ and Mg2+, have been used to provide positively charged sites and/or hydrophobic surfaces for enhancing the interactions between DNA and surfaces [4, 9, 10]. However, these modification methods usually compromise the inherent surface roughness of mica, making it more difficult to gain structural insight into biomolecules with nanometer resolution. Also such modified surfaces are not well suited for dynamic measurements of protein or DNA molecules, because the entire DNA molecule is often fixed tightly on the surface, leading to little or tardy response of the molecule to environmental changes.

To fix DNA on a surface for investigation into its interaction with other reactants, one strategy is to modify the terminal of the DNA strands, so that they specifically bind to surfaces [1113]. For instance, van Oijen et al. used biotin–avidin system to fix only one end and allow the rest of the single DNA molecule to interact with exonuclease [3]. Medalia et al. demonstrated a method that anchors two ends of a DNA fragment with a thiol group on a gold film-modified mica surface [14]. Recently, a novel strategy named “protein-assisted DNA immobilization” was proposed by Dukkipati et al. in which DNA binding proteins such as restriction enzymes or RNA polymerases are used as attachment points to adsorb DNA on surfaces [15]. Although this method can maintain the biological activity of the immobilized DNA molecules, it is not suitable for higher resolution imaging at nanometer scale by atomic force microscopy (AFM), because hydrophobic polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) surfaces have to absorb proteins.

We are working on single-molecule enzymatic reactions on mica surfaces by controlled dipping of a nonspecific endonuclease over the DNA molecules based on nanomanipulation [16]. To simultaneously realize the goals of obtaining structural insights into biomolecules with nanometer resolution and providing an appropriate condition for their biological processes, we investigated enzymatic reactions (DNase I) at single DNA molecules attached and immobilized on mica surfaces functioned by gold nanoparticles (GNPs), 1.4 nm-diameter nanoparticles (Nanogold). We demonstrate that Nanogold-modified mica surfaces (Nanogold-mica) have less effect on the length and topography of DNA molecules and provide a suitable environment for higher efficiency of enzymatic reactions on DNA.

Materials and Methods

The original DNA solutions (Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Co., Ltd) were diluted to final concentrations of 1 ng/μL for λ DNA and 0.1 ng/μL for pBR322, in TE buffer (10 mM TE–HCl, pH 8.0). Nanogold-mica was produced by treating freshly cleaved mica with 1–50 fM Nanogold (Nanoprobes, Stony Brook, NY) in water for 1 min. After being dried with nitrogen gas, the “spin-stretching” technique was used to stretch and fix DNA [17]. Briefly, 2–5 μL DNA was put on a Nanogold-mica, which was adhered firmly on a centrifuge. The spin speed was limited to <3,000 rpm to extend DNA for 30 s. Samples were washed twice with 10 μL deionized water and dried for imaging.

AFM imaging was conducted using the tapping mode of a MultiMode Scanning Probe microscope (NanoScope IIIa, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA) with a J Scanner. Noncontact cantilevers (NSC11, MikroMasch) with a resonance frequency of ~300 kHz and a spring constant of ~40 Nm−1were used for imaging at room temperature (in an ambient situation). All AFM images were flattened and analyzed with the microscope’s software system. The contour lengths of single DNA molecules and percentage of DNA occupied on surfaces were determined using METAMORPH software (MDS, Inc.) (see supporting information on the method of calculating DNA length and coverage, supplementary material 1).

For enzymatic digestion of DNA molecules, Dip-Pen Nanolithography (DPN) [16, 1820] was used to deposit DNase I on DNA. Briefly, an AFM tip coated with 0.01–0.05 unit/μL DNase I (Sigma) in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.3, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM CaCl2 was mounted on the sample stage. After the first DNA image was obtained by tapping mode, lift mode was turned on to move the AFM tip closer to the surface by setting a negative lift height value. The tip remained for a moment once it touched the surface to induce a meniscus between the tip and the surface. Then, the first image was scanned again with tapping mode but this time by depositing DNase I on the surface and the DNA. Afterwards, several images were recorded in situ to observe the process of DNA digestion. The digestion experiments were conducted in a relative humidity of 30–40% and a temperature of 20–25 °C.

Results and Discussion

Nanogold is generally used as a contrast agent in electron microscopy [21]. In our experiments, we utilize the unique properties of the positively charged Nanogold to act as cross-linker between negatively charged DNA and mica through electrostatic interactions (Fig. 1a). We expect that most parts of DNA are free except for the binding sites to Nanogold. Due to the fact that only bare mica is used and no other additional surface modification is needed, the inherent surface properties of mica such as its atomic flatness and hydrophilicity are less affected. So the features of DNA can be clearly observed, and a suitable surface for observing the biological activities of proteins can be provided.
Figure 1

a Schematic showing of the Nanogold-modified mica and the anchored DNA on it (not drawn to scale),b AFM topography image of Nanogold on a mica surface, andc The corresponding cross-section height profile of Nanogold

As shown in Fig. 1b and c, after the modification process, the Nanogold, 1.4 nm in height, is randomly dispersed on the mica surface. The roughness of the mica surface is changed a little by the sparse distribution of small size nanoparticles. The root mean square (RMS) roughness measured on the 1.75 μm × 1.75 μm area of the mica surface was ~0.06 nm. Although there is a slight increase in this value compared with a freshly cleaved mica surface of ~0.05 nm, it is sufficient for imaging DNA and studying the interaction between protein and DNA.

We have successfully deposited and immobilized DNA molecules in the presence of Nanogold. In principle, a reasonable number of binding events are controlled by varying the nanoparticles’ coverage on the surfaces. An increase in Nanogold concentration increases the attachment points on the surface, thus leading to more DNA binding. Figure 2shows the results of λ DNA attachment to a modified surface at two different Nanogold concentrations. In the case of 50 and 5 fM Nanogold, the coverage of DNA fixed on Nanogold-mica is about 4% (Fig. 2a) and 1% (Fig. 2b) respectively. Depending on the application, a different coverage of DNA attachment can be obtained. However, a higher density of Nanogold would influence the topography of DNA, thus it is important to control the numbers of Nanogold on mica surface to achieve a better DNA topography. In Fig. 2b, there are a few nanoparticles that are used to attach lambda DNA molecules on the surface, and the lower DNA molecule is anchored only by a single Nanogold. From the cross-section profile of Fig. 2c as shown in Fig. 2d, the measured height of the binding site is 1.8 nm (arrow 1), equaling the value of DNA height of 0.4 nm (the measured height of most parts of DNA, arrow 2), plus a Nanogold height of 1.4 nm (arrow 3). In addition, there is the measured height of 0.8 nm (three thin arrows in Fig. 2c) along DNA strands, implying other structures of DNA existing on the surface.
Figure 2

Typical AFM images of lambda DNA anchored on Nanogold-mica modified witha 50 fM andb 5 fM Nanogold. Height bar = 5 nmc An enlarged image from the mini square in Fig. 2b. Height bar = 2 nmd A height profile of DNA indicated by aline in Fig. 2c

We have also explored the general applicability of Nanogold to deposit circular and linear DNA on mica. Circular pBR322 DNA and Pst1 linearized pBR322 were chosen for this purpose. It has been reported that the enzyme sometimes shows limited catalytic activity on overstretched DNA molecules. Although it is possible to avoid overstretching by reducing the hydrophobic effects during the DNA-stretching processes [22], the problem of controlling this effect persists. However, in our experiments, DNA molecules are easily attached but not overstretched. As shown in Fig. 3, the measured lengths of DNA range from 1.31 to 1.48 μm regardless of linear or circular molecules, which is very close to the actual length, 1.48 μm. The preserved conformation of DNA would be a potential advantage for reactions of DNA with other molecules like proteins and enzymes.
Figure 3

AFM images of DNA anchored on Nanogold-mica surfaces.a StretchedPst1 linearized pBR322.b Circular pBR322

After being able to reproducibly deposit linear and circular DNA molecules on mica without overstretching them, it would be very interesting to explore whether DNA molecules attached on Nanogold-mica are beneficial for the investigation into enzymatic reactions along a single DNA molecule. To this end, a digestion reaction with DNase I was carried out. DNase I is a paradigm endonuclease used routinely for nonspecific cleavage of DNA in molecular biology. Figure 4 shows the process of the enzymatic reaction. The uniform linear DNA (Fig. 4a) was digested into several fragments immediately (Fig. 4b) after DNase I ink (bright spots in image) was transferred from the coated tip to the surface and DNA. The size of spots changed along with the time passed. About half an hour later, the volume of the ink spots decreased greatly (Fig. 4c). To observe DNA clearly, the sample was imaged again after 10 h. All bright spots and most parts of DNA disappeared, but tracks of DNA still remained (Fig. 4d). This phenomenon is interesting, its mechanism however is unclear so far. We think the disappearance of ink (Fig. 4b–d) may be caused by the tip’s effects, such as tip-induced diffusion and/or adsorption, during scanning processes. Other factors, such as liquid evaporation and liquid diffusion may also play a rule. To exclude any chance that the observed gaps could have been caused by mechanical force applied by the AFM tip, control experiments with denatured enzyme were performed, and no such digestion phenomenon occurred. The results imply that the flat, hydrophilic Nanogold-mica surface is suitable for the detection of enzymatic digestions of DNA by AFM. We note that no additional sample washing steps were needed; therefore, this technique not only completely eliminates any possible artifacts caused by the water flow, but also has the potential to be developed into a method for recording digestion reactions in a time-lapse manner. It should be noted that although the cleavage of DNA can be observed on other modified surfaces, such as APTES-mica [16] and Ni-mica [23], using Nanogold-mica facilitates the detection of small gaps in the DNA due to the relatively free state of the molecule. Most of the DNA has weak interaction with the surface except at the points that are anchored by Nanogold. Once the phosphodiester linkages are broken, the ends of the DNA fragments have a tendency to adjust their positions because of their entropic property, so a larger gap appears. Additionally, the modified surface is flat, providing a unique platform to probe the topography of DNA. Moreover, the entire smooth surface is hydrophilic because of the hydrophilic mica surface and the water soluble Nanogold. The flat, hydrophilic surface facilitates ink and small DNA fragments to diffuse on the substrate, leading to an enlarged gap and a clear view field. So a digestion reaction of DNA can be probed clearly, even without washing steps.
Figure 4

AFM images of DNA reaction of digestion by DNase I. Height scales = 8 nm except for (a).a DNA topography before digestion. Height scale = 2 nm.b DNA fragments just after a DPN process.c DNA fragments after DPN 0.5 h.d Traces of DNA after DPN 10 h


We have demonstrated that we are able to facilely deposit and anchor DNA molecules on a mica surface using Nanogold for single-molecule enzymatic reactions. The immobilization of DNA on Nanogold-modified surfaces does not require time-consuming steps, and the fixed DNA strands on the surface can easily be observed on AFM images. Because the Nanogold distribution largely determines the interaction forces between mica and the adsorbed DNA molecules, we could minimize any possible influence of the surface on the native properties of DNA molecules by adjusting the concentrations of nanoparticles, thus providing conditions in which distinct conformations of DNA molecules and their interactions with proteins or other materials can be studied better. By using Dip-Pen Nanolithography to dip DNase I over DNA molecules, we have realized to digest single DNA molecules with higher efficiency. Further research toward more careful control over the deposited density of the Nanogold on surfaces for fixing DNA in solution and probe the structure-related properties of DNA with various kinds of restriction endonucleases needs to be conducted. Some of this research is currently under way in our research group.



This work was supported by grants from NSFC (10675160, 10604061, and 10874198).

Authors’ Affiliations

Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences


  1. Visnapuu M-L, Duzdevich D, Greene EC: Mol. Biosyst.. 2008, 4: 394. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXkvFWhtbo%3D] 10.1039/b800444gView Article
  2. Rhoades E, Gussakoysky E, Haran G: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003, 100: 3197–3202. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXisVCntrs%3D]; Bibcode number [2003PNAS..100.3197R] 10.1073/pnas.2628068100View Article
  3. van Oijen AM, Blainey PC, Crampton DJ, Richardson CC, Ellenberger T, Xie XS: Science. 2003, 301: 1235. Bibcode number [2003Sci...301.1235V] Bibcode number [2003Sci...301.1235V] 10.1126/science.1084387View Article
  4. Hansma HG, Laney DE: Biophys. J.. 1996, 70: 1933. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhvVGjsL0%3D]; Bibcode number [1996BpJ....70.1933H] 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79757-6View Article
  5. Bussiek M, Toth K, Muecke N, Brun N, Langowski J: Biophys. J.. 2005, 88: 58a.
  6. van Noort SJT, Willemsen OH, van der Werf KO, de Grooth BG, Greve J: Langmuir. 1999, 15: 7101. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXpslaruw%3D%3D] 10.1021/la990459aView Article
  7. Lyubchenko YL, Gall AA, Shlyakhtenko LS, Harrington RE, Jacobs BL, Oden PI, Lindsay SM: J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.. 1992, 10: 589. View Article
  8. Sasou M, Sugiyama S, Yoshino T, Ohtani T: Langmuir. 2003, 19: 9845. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXosVCrtrc%3D] 10.1021/la035054bView Article
  9. Thundat T, Allison DP, Warmack RJ, Brown GM, Jacobson KB, Schrick JJ, Ferrell TL: Scanning Microsc.. 1992, 6: 911.
  10. Chan TF, Ha C, Phong A, Cai D, Wan E, Leung L, Kwok PY, Xiao M: Nucleic Acids Res.. 2006, 34: e113. 10.1093/nar/gkl593View Article
  11. Matsuura S, Komatsu J, Hirano K, Yasuda H, Takashima K, Katsura S, Mizuno A: Nucleic Acids Res.. 2001, 29: e79. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvlvFWhug%3D%3D] 10.1093/nar/29.16.e79View Article
  12. Kim JH, Larson RG: Nucleic Acids Res.. 2007, 35: 3848. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXosFSnu7g%3D] 10.1093/nar/gkm332View Article
  13. Crut A, Geron-Landre B, Bonnet I, Bonneau S, Desbiolles P, Escude C: Nucleic Acids Res.. 2005, 33: e98. 10.1093/nar/gni097View Article
  14. Medalia O, Englander J, Guckenberger R, Sperling J: Ultramicroscopy. 2002, 90: 103. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhslWjs7o%3D] 10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00141-3View Article
  15. Dukkipati VR, Kim JH, Pang SW, Larson RG: Nano Lett.. 2006, 6: 2499. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpvFKitr0%3D]; Bibcode number [2006NanoL...6.2499D] 10.1021/nl0617484View Article
  16. Li B, Zhang Y, Yan SH, Lu JH, Ye M, Li MQ, Hu J: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2007, 129: 6668. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXltVWqsLY%3D] 10.1021/ja0687015View Article
  17. Yokota H, Sunwoo J, Sarikaya M, van den Engh G, Aebersold R: Anal. Chem.. 1999, 71: 4418. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXlt1ansr8%3D] 10.1021/ac9902695View Article
  18. Piner RD, Zhu J, Xu F, Hong SH, Mirkin CA: Science. 1999, 283: 661. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXot1KksA%3D%3D] 10.1126/science.283.5402.661View Article
  19. Li B, Zhang Y, Hu J, Li MQ: Ultramicroscopy. 2005, 105: 312. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFKmurrL] 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.056View Article
  20. Hyun J, Kim J, Craig SL, Chilkoti A: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2004, 126: 4770–4771. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXisFaqsbw%3D] 10.1021/ja049956qView Article
  21. Hainfeld JF, Powell RD: J. Histochem. Cytochem.. 2000, 48: 471. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXisVyms7g%3D] 10.1177/002215540004800404View Article
  22. Gueroui Z, Place C, Freyssingeas E, Berge B: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002, 99: 6005. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjslWgurY%3D]; Bibcode number [2002PNAS...99.6005G] 10.1073/pnas.092561399View Article
  23. Pietrement O, Pastre D, Landousy F, David MO, Fusil S, Hamon L, Zozime A, Le Cam E: Eur. Biophys. J.. 2005, 34: 200. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjslOku7s%3D] 10.1007/s00249-004-0443-yView Article


© to the authors 2009