Composite Electrodes for Electrochemical Supercapacitors

  • Jun Li1,

    Affiliated with

    • QuanMin Yang2 and

      Affiliated with

      • Igor Zhitomirsky1Email author

        Affiliated with

        Nanoscale Research Letters20105:512

        DOI: 10.1007/s11671-009-9518-0

        Received: 30 July 2009

        Accepted: 17 December 2009

        Published: 7 January 2010

        Abstract

        Manganese dioxide nanofibers with length ranged from 0.1 to 1 μm and a diameter of about 4–6 nm were prepared by a chemical precipitation method. Composite electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors were fabricated by impregnation of the manganese dioxide nanofibers and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) into porous Ni plaque current collectors. Obtained composite electrodes, containing 85% of manganese dioxide and 15 mass% of MWCNT, as a conductive additive, with total mass loading of 7–15 mg cm−2, showed a capacitive behavior in 0.5-M Na2SO4 solutions. The decrease in stirring time during precipitation of the nanofibers resulted in reduced agglomeration and higher specific capacitance (SC). The highest SC of 185 F g−1 was obtained at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 for mass loading of 7 mg cm−2. The SC decreased with increasing scan rate and increasing electrode mass.

        Keywords

        Manganese dioxide Carbon nanotube Nickel plaque Supercapacitor Impregnation Composite

        Introduction

        Porous Ni materials, such as plaques [1] and foams [2], are widely used in industry for the fabrication of electrodes for rechargeable batteries. Nanostructured active materials are impregnated chemically or electrochemically into the porous Ni structures, which are used as current collectors [3]. Ni plaques are current collectors of choice for battery applications demanding high power and reliability, along with long cycle life, such as batteries for aerospace and railway applications, power tools and some portable electronics [1]. The pore size of Ni plaques is smaller compared to that of foams. The smaller pore size decreases the distance for electrons to travel from the current collector into the active material during cell discharge and consequently improves the discharge rate characteristics for high power applications [3]. Significant advances in the development of Ni plaques were achieved by the use of filamentary Ni particles with high surface area, which improved contact with active materials [4].

        A new wave of interest in the application of porous Ni materials is related to the development of electrochemical supercapacitors (ES) [5]. ES can complement or replace batteries in electrical energy storage applications when high-power delivery is required [6]. Manganese dioxides with various crystalline structures are important materials for electrodes of ES [7]. The interest in the application of manganese dioxide in ES is related to low cost of this material, which exhibits high SC in environmentally friendly aqueous electrolytes [8].

        The charging mechanism of manganese dioxide electrodes of ES is described by the following reaction [9]:
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Equa_HTML.gif
        (1)

        where A+ = Li+, Na+, K+, H+. Equation 1 indicates that high electronic and ionic conductivity of the electrode material are important in order to utilize the high theoretical capacitance (1,370 F g−1) of manganese dioxide [10]. Composite [11] and thin film electrodes [12] were developed and investigated. The properties of MnO2 are influenced by crystalline structure, particle size, porosity and surface area [13]. A complicating factor in the application of MnO2 in ES is low electronic conductivity of this material. This problem can be addressed by the use of advanced current collectors, such as Ni plaques.

        In a previous investigation [14], manganese dioxide nanofibers were prepared by a chemical precipitation method and utilized for the fabrication of composite manganese dioxide—MWCNT films by electrophoretic deposition. The composite films deposited on stainless steel foils showed high SC in a voltage window of 1.0 V. However, the SC decreased significantly with increasing film thickness. The results presented below indicated that relatively high SC can be achieved at high active material loading using Ni plaques as current collectors. In this approach, the high surface area and porous structure of the Ni plaques provided improved electrical contact of the current collector with active material and enabled good electrolyte access to the active material. We presented experimental results on the fabrication of composite electrodes, investigation into electrode microstructure and electrochemical behavior.

        Experimental Procedures

        Manganese dioxide nanofibers were prepared by the method described in the previous investigation [14]. In this approach, precipitation was performed by the reduction of 0.2-M KMnO4 (Aldrich) solutions with ethanol using the following reaction:
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Equb_HTML.gif
        (2)

        MWCNT were provided by Arkema company. The average diameter of MWCNT was ~15 nm and length ~0.5 μm. Ni plaques with mass of 0.1 mg cm−2 were provided by Inco company and impregnated with a manganese dioxide slurry containing 15 mass% of MWCNT.

        XRD studies were performed with a diffractometer (Nicolet I2) using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation at a scanning speed of 0.5 deg min−1. TGA and DTA of the manganese dioxide nanofibers were carried out in air at a heating rate of 5 °C/min using a thermoanalyzer (Netzsch STA-409). Electron microscopy investigations were performed using a JEOL 2010F transmission electron microscope and a JEOL JSM-7000F scanning electron microscope equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy.

        Capacitive behavior of the electrodes was studied using a potentiostat (PARSTAT 2273, Princeton Applied Research) controlled by a computer using a PowerSuite electrochemical software. Electrochemical studies were performed using a standard three-electrode cell containing 0.5 M-Na2SO4 aqueous solution degassed with purified nitrogen gas. The surface area of the working electrodes was 1 cm2. The counter electrode was a platinum gauze, and the reference electrode was a standard calomel electrode (SCE). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies were performed within a potential range of 0–1.0 V versus SCE at scan rates of 2–100 mV s−1. The SC was calculated using half the integrated area of the CV curve to obtain the charge (Q), and subsequently dividing the charge by the mass of the active material (m) and the width of the potential window (ΔV):
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Equc_HTML.gif
        (3)

        Impedance spectroscopy investigations were performed in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz–100 kHz at amplitude voltage of 5 mV. Simulations of the impedance behavior were performed on the basis of the equivalent-circuit models using ZsimpWin 3.10 commercial software.

        Results and Discussion

        In the previous investigation [14], manganese dioxide nanofibers were prepared by the reduction in KMnO4 solutions with ethanol, followed by stirring of obtained suspensions during 20 h, and then washing and drying of the suspension. As an extension of the previous investigation, the stirring time was varied in the range of 1–20 h. Figure 1a, 1b show typical TEM images of the nanofibers obtained after 1 h of stirring. The diameter of the nanofibers was 4–6 nm and length 0.1–1 μm. It was found that the nanofibers were not individual crystals but were composed of small nanoparticles with typical size less than 5 nm. The diameter of the nanofibers was non-uniform (Fig. 1b). The increase in the stirring time from 1 to 20 h resulted in partial agglomeration of the nanofibers, which formed bundles (Fig. 1c), containing individual nanofibers. This result was in a good agreement with the results of investigation into other nanomaterials [15], which indicated that stirring of nanoparticles can promote agglomeration.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig1_HTML.jpg
        Figure 1

        TEM images of the nanofibers a, b after stirring during 1 h and c typical bundles formed after stirring during 20 h

        XRD studies (Fig. 2) showed changes in the diffraction patterns of the nanofibers with increasing stirring time. The XRD pattern of the nanofibers stirred for 1 h showed XRD peaks of birnessite, corresponding to the JCPDS file 87-1497. According to the literature, birnessite has a two-dimensional layered structure that consists of edge-shared MnO6 octahedra with cation and water molecules occupying the interlayer regions [16]. The birnessite formula is generally expressed as A x MnO2+y(H2O) z , in which A represents an alkali metal cation. The average oxidation state of Mn usually falls between 3.6 and 3.8, which represents a predominance of Mn4+ with minor amounts of Mn3+ and Mn2+[16]. The intensity of the peaks of the birnessite phase decreased with increasing stirring time, indicating lower crystallinity. After 20 h of stirring, the XRD pattern showed very small broad peaks. It was suggested that the nanofibers contained crystalline and amorphous phases.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig2_HTML.jpg
        Figure 2

        X-ray diffraction patterns for powders, containing nanofibers stirred during a 1 and b 20 h (inverted filled triangle—JCPDS file 87-1497)

        It was found that the precipitated manganese dioxide nanofibers contained potassium and adsorbed water. EDS studies showed the K/Mn atomic ratio of 0.16 ± 0.03 and 0.14 ± 0.03 for nanofibers stirred during 1 and 20 h, respectively. Figure 3 shows TGA and DTA data for the nanofibers stirred during 1 h. The TGA studies of the powders showed the mass loss related to the dehydration at temperatures below 400 °C. Corresponding DTA data showed a broad endotherm at ~150 °C. Small mass gain in the range of 400–420 °C in TGA data and corresponding DTA exothermic peak can be attributed to oxidation of non-stoichiometric manganese dioxide. The mass loss in the range of 880–900 °C and corresponding endotherm can be attributed to reduction of manganese dioxide in agreement with the literature data [17]. Similar behavior was observed for the nanofibers stirred during 20 h.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig3_HTML.jpg
        Figure 3

        a TGA and b DTA data for nanofibers stirred during 1 h (exo—shows exothermic effects)

        The slurries containing manganese dioxide nanofibers and MWCNT were used for the impregnation of Ni plaques. Figure 4a shows a schematic of the cross-section of a Ni plaque, which consists of a perforated Ni foil and sintered Ni particles. The voids between the particles provide a space for the loading of the plaques with an active material. Figure 4b, 4c show SEM images of the surface of a Ni plaque at different magnifications. The plaques exhibited porous microstructure with pore size in the range of 1–50 μm (Fig. 4b). The SEM image obtained at higher magnification (Fig. 4c) showed small particle size of Ni particles in the range of 0.5–3 μm, which formed a conductive porous matrix. It was suggested that high surface area, small particle size, porosity and conductivity of Ni plaques are beneficial for application in ES. The SEM image of the impregnated material showed porous fibrous microstructure (Fig. 5) containing manganese dioxide nanofibers and MWCNT.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig4_HTML.jpg
        Figure 4

        a Schematic of a cross-section of a Ni plaque, containing perforated Ni foil (thickness 0.1 mm) and sintered Ni particles (1–3 μm) and b, c SEM images of the surface of a Ni plaque at different magnifications

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig5_HTML.jpg
        Figure 5

        SEM image of a composite manganese dioxide nanofibers—MWCNT material impregnated into a Ni plaque

        In the previous investigation [14], it was found that manganese dioxide nanofibers and MWCNT formed a porous fibrous network, which was beneficial for the electrolyte access to the active material. However, the SC of the films deposited on metal foil substrates decreased significantly with increasing film mass from 50 to 300 μg cm−2. In contrast, the results presented below showed that relatively high SC can be obtained for active material loading of 7–15 mg cm−2 using Ni plaque current collectors. In this approach, porous Ni current collectors [2] provided improved contact with active material, whereas MWCNT was used as a conductive additive.

        Figure 6 shows typical CVs for the composite electrode with material loading of 7 mg cm−2. Within the potential range of 0–1.0 V versus SCE, the composite electrode exhibited capacitive-like current-potential responses, indicated by the box shape of the CVs. It is clear from the Fig. 6 that there are no redox peaks in the range between 0 and 1.0 V. Figure 7 shows SC at different scan rates for the composite electrodes. The SC decreased with increasing scan rate due to the diffusion limitations in pores. The electrodes prepared using powders stirred during 1 h showed higher SC compared to the powders stirred during 20 h. This can be attributed to low agglomeration of the powders stirred during 1 h. This result indicated that further optimization of the powder processing conditions can be beneficial for the improvement in electrode performance. The highest SC of 185 F g−1 was achieved at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 for material loading of 7 mg cm−2. However, the SC decreased with increasing material loading (Fig. 8). The reduction in the SC is especially evident at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. Turning again to the results of the previous investigation [14], it is seen that due to the use of Ni plaque current collectors, the material loading can be increased by 1–2 orders of magnitude, and relatively high SC can be obtained. Moreover, the SC (Fig. 8) at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 for the 7 mg cm−2 loading of Ni plaque (SC = 111 F g−1) was higher compared to the SC of the 0.24 mg cm−2 film (SC = 82 F g−1) deposited on a foil substrate [14]. The high SC at high scan rates is important for the fabrication of efficient ES [6].
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig6_HTML.jpg
        Figure 6

        CVs for a composite electrode containing manganese dioxide nanofibers stirred during 1 h, mixed with MWCNT and impregnated into a Ni plaque with material loading of 7 mg cm−2 at scan rates of a 10, b 20 and c 50 mV s−1

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig7_HTML.jpg
        Figure 7

        SC versus scan rate for composite electrode containing manganese dioxide nanofibers stirred during a 1 h and b 20 h, mixed with MWCNT and impregnated into Ni plaques with material loading of 10 mg cm−2

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig8_HTML.jpg
        Figure 8

        SC versus scan rate for composite electrodes containing manganese dioxide nanofibers stirred during 1 h, mixed with MWCNT and impregnated into Ni plaques with material loading of a 7 mg cm−2 and b 14 mg cm−2

        Figure 9 shows charge–discharge behaviour for the composite electrode with material loading of 10 mg cm−2. The charge–discharge curves obtained at different current densities were nearly linear and indicated good capacitive behavior in agreement with box shape CVs shown in Fig. 6. Figure 10 shows impedance spectroscopy data for the sample of the same mass. The equivalent circuit of ES was discussed in the literature and included RC transmission line, describing the porous electrode [5]. C n elements represent double-layer capacitance and pseudo capacitance, whereas R n elements represent electrolyte resistance in pores, Faradaic resistance and equivalent series resistance of the electrodes [18]. Conway and Pell described the impedance of porous electrode using 5-element (n = 5) circuit [5]. A constant phase impedance (CPE) element, rather than a pure capacitance C, was used in another investigation [19]. The CPE element describes a ‘leaking’ capacitor with microscopic roughness of the surface and capacitance dispersion of interfacial origin. The equivalent circuits should allow an optimum representation of the measured spectra with a minimum set of model parameters. Good agreement of simulated and measured data (Fig. 10) was found for the equivalent circuit similar to that proposed for composite ruthenium oxide-graphite electrodes [20]. In this circuit, C1 and R1 described double-layer capacitance and charge transfer resistance, respectively. Q2 described CPE impedance of porous electrode, and R2 represented electrolyte resistance. The high frequency Z′ value of the complex impedance Z = Z′ − iZ″ showed that R = R1 + R2 is about 0.4 Ohm for the sample with an area of 1 cm2. Relatively low resistance R is beneficial for high power ES [18].
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig9_HTML.jpg
        Figure 9

        Charge–discharge behavior for composite electrode containing manganese dioxide nanofibers stirred during 1 h, mixed with MWCNT and impregnated into Ni plaques with material loading of 10 mg cm−2 at current densities of a 60 b 40 and c 20 mA cm−2

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11671-009-9518-0/MediaObjects/11671_2009_Article_9518_Fig10_HTML.jpg
        Figure 10

        Impedance spectroscopy data for composite electrode containing manganese dioxide nanofibers stirred during 1 h, mixed with MWCNT and impregnated into Ni plaques with material loading of 10 mg cm−2

        Conclusions

        Manganese dioxide nanofibers with length ranged from 0.1 to 1 μm and a diameter of about 4–6 nm were prepared by a chemical precipitation method. Composite electrodes for ES, containing two different fibrous materials, were fabricated by impregnation of slurries of the manganese dioxide nanofibers and MWCNT, as a conductive additive, into porous Ni plaque current collectors. The composite electrodes with total mass loading of 7–15 mg cm−2 showed good capacitive behavior in the 0.5 M Na2SO4 solutions. The reduction in stirring time of the precipitated nanofibers resulted in lower agglomeration and higher SC. The highest SC of 185 F g−1 was obtained at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 for materials loading of 7 mg cm−2. Testing results indicated that Ni plaques are promising current collector materials for application in ES.

        Declarations

        Acknowledgments

        The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

        Open Access

        This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McMaster University
        (2)
        Vale Inco Limited

        References

        1. Chani VI, Yang Q, Wilkinson DS, Weatherly GC: J Power Sources. 2005, 142: 370. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXis1Cgtr4%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXis1Cgtr4%3D] 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.021View Article
        2. Yang QM, Ettel VA, Babjak J, Charles DK, Mosoiu MA: J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2003, 150: A543. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhvFahu74%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhvFahu74%3D] 10.1149/1.1559070View Article
        3. Cormier E, Wasmund EB, Renny LV, Yang QM, Charles D: J Power Sources. 2007, 171: 999. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVSrsLvN] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVSrsLvN] 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.253View Article
        4. Zaitsev AY, Wilkinson DS, Weatherly GC, Stephenson TF: J Power Sources. 2003, 123: 253. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlvFegtbc%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlvFegtbc%3D] 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00534-2View Article
        5. Conway BE, Pell WG: J Power Sources. 2002, 105: 169. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XitVyjtbs%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XitVyjtbs%3D] 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00936-3View Article
        6. Simon P, Gogotsi Y: Nat. Mater.. 2008, 7: 845. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht12jtb%2FM]; Bibcode number [2008NatMa...7..845S] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht12jtb%2FM]; Bibcode number [2008NatMa...7..845S] 10.1038/nmat2297View Article
        7. Jeong YU, Manthiram A: J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2002, 149: A1419. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvVWqtrk%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvVWqtrk%3D] 10.1149/1.1511188View Article
        8. Brousse T, Toupin M, Belanger D: J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2004, 151: 614. 10.1149/1.1650835View Article
        9. Athouel L, Moser F, Dugas R, Crosnier O, Belanger D, Brousse T: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008, 112: 7270. 10.1021/jp0773029View Article
        10. Devaraj S, Munichandraiah N: Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.. 2005, 8: A373. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXltlyhu7g%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXltlyhu7g%3D] 10.1149/1.1922869View Article
        11. Brousse T, Taberna P-L, Crosnier O, Dugas R, Guillemet P, Scudeller Y, Zhou Y, Favier F, Bélanger D, Simon P: J Power Sources. 2007, 173: 633. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFalsLrK] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFalsLrK] 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.074View Article
        12. Pang S-C, Anderson MA, Chapman TW: J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2000, 147: 444. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtlWhtLw%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtlWhtLw%3D] 10.1149/1.1393216View Article
        13. Chang J-K, Hsu S-H, Tsai W-T, Sun IW: J Power Sources. 2008, 177: 676. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlGitro%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlGitro%3D] 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.039View Article
        14. Li J, Zhitomirsky I: J. Mater. Process. Technol.. 2009, 209: 3452. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvV2isrw%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvV2isrw%3D] 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.001View Article
        15. Zhitomirsky I, Gal-Or L: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.. 1997, 8: 213. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXislWlsrg%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXislWlsrg%3D] 10.1023/A:1018587623231View Article
        16. Ching S, Petrovay DJ, Jorgensen ML, Suib SL: Inorg. Chem.. 1997, 36: 883. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXit1KntL4%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXit1KntL4%3D] 10.1021/ic961088dView Article
        17. Nagarajan N, Cheong M, Zhitomirsky I: Mater. Chem. Phys.. 2007, 103: 47. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkslWnurw%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXkslWnurw%3D] 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.01.005View Article
        18. Kötz R, Carlen M: Electrochim. Acta. 2000, 45: 2483. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00354-6View Article
        19. Pell WG, Zolfaghari A, Conway BE: J. Electroanal. Chem.. 2002, 532: 13. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntFyht7w%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntFyht7w%3D] 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)00676-9View Article
        20. Mitra S, Lokesh KS, Sampath S: J Power Sources. 2008, 185: 1544. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlOms7jM] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlOms7jM] 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.014View Article

        Copyright

        © The Author(s) 2010