On the Morphology, Structure and Field Emission Properties of Silver-Tetracyanoquinodimethane Nanostructures
© The Author(s) 2010
Received: 22 April 2010
Accepted: 7 May 2010
Published: 22 June 2010
Silver-tetracyanoquinodimethane(Ag-TCNQ) nanostructured arrays with different morphologies were grown by an organic vapor-transport reaction under different conditions. The field emission properties of nanostructured arrays were studied systematically. Their morphology and crystal structure were characterized by SEM and XRD, respectively. It was found that the field emission properties were strongly dependent on the reaction temperature and the initial Ag film thickness. The lowest turn-on field with 10-nm-thick silver film is about 2.0 V/μm, comparable to that of carbon nanotubes. The film crystal structure and the morphology are contributed to the final emission performance.
KeywordsOrganic semiconductor Nanostructures Ag-TCNQ Field emission
Field emission is of considerable interest over the past few years. Especially, various kinds of conventional inorganic semiconductors have been considered as promising field emitters to fabricate field emission displays because of their high enhancement factor, physical and chemical properties and wide range of possible applications . However, organic nanostructured materials are scarcely reported on the field emission properties. Tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (Alq) , copper hexadeca fluorophthalocyanine (F16CuPc) , CuPc , copper/silver tetrafluoro tetracyanoquinodimethane (CuTCNQF4) and AgTCNQF4 have been reported. It is especially notable for the M-TCNQF4 nanostructures, which exhibit tunable morphologies, high current density and low turn-on field. But the growth temperature of M-TCNQF4 nanostructures is higher than 443 K. M-TCNQ one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures grown at a lower reaction temperature have attracted enormous attention due to their electrical switching effect for memory device application , and large area  and enhanced field emission by a metal buffer layer  are reported. It is better for device on those flexible substrates that the reaction temperature is relatively low.
However, it is still elusive to understand the relations between the growth conditions and the emission properties due to the complex shape and crystalline structure; defects and interface states. So in this paper, the dependence of field emission from Ag-TCNQ nanowires on different growth conditions including reaction temperature, starting silver film thickness and reaction time span were studied and discussed according to SEM and XRD characterizations of the Ag-TCNQ nanostructures in detail.
The samples were produced via a vacuum vapor-transport reaction method developed in our previous work . First, Ag film was thermal evaporated on substrate with base pressure of 2 × 10−3 Pa and thickness monitored by an in situ microbalance of quartz crystal. The metal film on the substrate together with TCNQ powder (98%, Aldrich) was then placed in a quartz tube connected to a vacuum chamber. After pumping down to 2 × 10−3 Pa, the quartz tube was sealed and thermal treated in the furnace. After reacting for some time, the blue-colored film covered on the substrate was prepared and then taken out for subsequent experiments.
To study the field emission properties of Ag-TCNQ nanostructures, the morphologies characterization for those samples grown under different conditions is necessary. The morphology is characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, XL30FEG,PHILIPS, with a resolution of 2 nm). The structure of the as-grown nanostructures is by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max-3C).
Field emission measurements were carried out in a parallel-plate configuration with the base pressure of 5 × 10−3 Pa in a vacuum chamber. The nanostructures sample acted as the cathode, and a steel cylindrical electrode acted as the anode. In this study, the turn-on field is defined as the applied electric field that can generate a current density of 10 μA/cm2. The cross-sectional area of the anode is 0.498 cm2 defined as the field emission area to obtain the current density.
Results and Discussion
In addition, the thickness of silver film greatly influences the length of as-obtained nanowires. Actually, the length of the nanowire depends on the thickness as well as the growth time. Given that the growth reaction is completed, we observe that the thickness of the pre-deposited Ag film actually dominates the length of Ag-TCNQ nanowires from the side-view SEM image of as-obtained nanowires. First, as the Ag+ source for nanowire growth is derived from the pre-deposited Ag film, the thicker film will provide larger amount of Ag source, which would extend the reaction time in the process of nanowire growth, thus Ag-TCNQ with larger length could form. In short, the thickness of the pre-deposited film is proportional to the length of as-obtained nanowire. However, when the thickness is rather high (etc. μm order), the film is unlikely to melt into molten droplets within the thermal treatment. Therefore, the VS growth process would be inhabited resulting in the absence of nanowire to synthesize. The same results can also be obtained with regard to Cu-TCNQ counterpart.
where B is the constant of 6.83 × 103 d is the vacuum gap distance between electrodes. Three F–N plots of Ag-TCNQ nanowires grown with different thickness of Ag film are given in Fig. 5a corresponding to the J-E curves in Fig. 5b. In the middle curve for sample with the 10-nm-thick Ag film, the nonlinearity is obvious; but both of the others show a good line with almost the same slope. The following are the reasons for the nonlinearity. First, from the corresponding SEM images in Fig. 2a, there are many nanowires lying on the substrate. The side of Ag-TCNQ nanowire acts as emitters, some defects (adsorbates) on the side may first emit the electrons. Its field enhancement factor is different from the tip of nanowires in the other two samples. Second, different enhancement factors appear in different field regions. In the low field region, these defects have larger enhancement factor, resulting in a lower slope. With the increase in the field, the defects become less and at the same time some nanowires with smaller factor than that of those defects contribute to the emission current. As a result, higher slope appears in this field region. With the field further increasing, smaller slope results from both lying and vertical wires with little defects. Semet  reported that the linearity of F–N plot can be obtained by desorbing by applying the field for long time. It can be reduced that the defects (adsorbate) in the body of emitters result in the emission current and then the nonlinear F–N plot. Other nonlinearity in nanomaterials is reported either and discussed [12, 13].
Figure 6b, 6c shows the I-E curves and corresponding F–N plots for sweeping emission from Ag-TCNQ nanowires with 30-nm-thick Ag film. The I-E curves in Fig. 6b almost remain coincident, but the corresponding F–N plots for them are not in complete agreement especially in low field region shown in Fig. 6c. These F–N plots are separated with low and high field regions for each sweeping process. The intercedes of the F–N plots in y-axis are equal, suggesting that the emission area in this high field region not changed, and the stability of field emission is high. The slopes and intercedes of these plots in the high field region are the same, showing the effective emission area and the emission for the Ag-TCNQ nanowires constant and stable.
Those different nanostructures array with some certain morphology have different field enhancement factor and effective work function. From the Eq. 2, we can estimate the work function by supposing properly a given field enhancement factor and evaluating the slope of the F–N plots in Fig. 6c. For those grown with 30-nm-thick Ag films in Fig. 2, the length maximum of nanowires is supposed to be about 10 μm, and the diameter is about 100 nm combined with SEM images.
Allowing for the electrical switching effect, the first decreasing the field is the process of recovery of Ag-TCNQ with high competence. If the field enhancement factor being 150 and 120 for Ag-TCNQ nanowires, respectively, the local effective work function for Ag-TCNQ nanowires in form of phase I can be derived to be 1.71 and 1.48 eV, respectively according to the slope of plot 3 in Fig. 6c. The work function for Ag-TCNQ nanowires grown with the initial 50-nm-thick Ag film is derived similarly to be 1.77 eV with the value of field enhancement factor being 100 in Fig. 5b. So the work function for the Ag-TCNQ nanowires array is smaller than 1.77 eV.
Properties comparison of some organic materials for field emission
Vacuum gap (μm) (thickness)
Turn-on field (V/μm)
Work function (eV)
600 (50 nm Ag)
600 (30 nm Ag)
1.71 or 1.48
8.7(alfa) 8.1(beta) 9.7(alfa + beta)
In conclusion, the field emission properties for Ag-TCNQ nanostructured array were dependent on the structure and morphology determined by the reaction temperature and the initial Ag film thickness. The turn-on field to generate a density of 10 μA/cm2 increases with the growth temperature from 373 to 413 K, and the lowest turn-on field obtained is about 2.0 V/μm for phase II. The deviation from the F–N linear relation may result from the difference of field enhancement factors at high and low field region, not excluding the emission from the surface defects in the nanowires in the low field region. The effective work function of Ag-TCNQ phase I nanowires array is estimated to be about 1.77 eV at most, which is lower among the organic materials.
This work is supported financially both by NSFC (60471010, 60976050) and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu (0901082C).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Fang X, Bando Y, Gautam UK, Ye C, Golberg D: J. Mater. Chem.. 2008, 18: 509. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVGrsbo%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVGrsbo%3D] 10.1039/b712874fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiu JJ, Kei CC, Perng TP, Wang WS: Adv. Mater.. 2003, 15: 1361. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFyjurg%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFyjurg%3D] 10.1002/adma.200304918View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tong WY, Li ZX, Djurisic AB, Chan WK, Yu SF: Mater. Lett.. 2007, 61: 3842. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVClsr8%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVClsr8%3D] 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.12.044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang C, Guo Y, Liu H, Zhao Y, Li G, Li Y, Song Y, Li Y: J. Phys. Chem. C.. 2009, 113: 7044. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvFKltbg%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjvFKltbg%3D] 10.1021/jp8113545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng KB, Shen HT, Ye CN, Li JL, Sun DL, Chen GR: Nano-Micro. Lett.. 2009, 1: 23–26. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjvFemt7w%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjvFemt7w%3D]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu H, Zhao Q, Li Y, Liu Y, Lu F, Zhuang J, Wang S, Jiang L, Zhu D, Yu D: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 1120. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitlGmuw%3D%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitlGmuw%3D%3D] 10.1021/ja0438359View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng K, Li X, Mo X, Chen G, Wang Z, Chen G: Appl. Surf. Sci.. 2010, 256: 2764. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1Oltb0%3D]; Bibcode number [2010ApSS..256.2764Z] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1Oltb0%3D]; Bibcode number [2010ApSS..256.2764Z] 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.11.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chun-Nuan Y, Guan-Ying C, Xiao-Liang M, Fang F, Xiao-Yan X, Guo-Rong C, Da-Lin S: Chin. Phys. Lett.. 2004, 21: 1787. Bibcode number [2004ChPhL..21.1777C] Bibcode number [2004ChPhL..21.1777C] 10.1088/0256-307X/21/9/031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Kane SA, Clérac R, Zhao H, Ouyang X, Galán-Mascarós JR, Heintz R, Dunbar KR: J. Solid. State. Chem.. 2000, 152: 159. Bibcode number [2000JSSCh.152..159O] Bibcode number [2000JSSCh.152..159O] 10.1006/jssc.2000.8679View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forbes RG, Jensen KL, : Ultramicroscopy. 2001,89(1–3):17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Semet V, Binh VT, Vincent P, Guillot D, Teo K, Chhowalla M, Amaratunga G, Milne WI, Legagneux P, Pribat D: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2002, 81: 343. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XkvFOqsrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..81..343S] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XkvFOqsrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2002ApPhL..81..343S] 10.1063/1.1489084View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Deng SZ, Xu NS, Chen J, Ma XC, Wang EG: Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2002, 327: 16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01871-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu NS, Chen J, Deng SZ: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2000, 76: 2463. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXis1agu7s%3D]; Bibcode number [2000ApPhL..76.2463X] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXis1agu7s%3D]; Bibcode number [2000ApPhL..76.2463X] 10.1063/1.126377View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heintz RA, Zhao H, Ouyang X, Grandinetti G, Cowen J, Dunbar KR: Inorg. Chem.. 1999, 38: 144. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvFWrtLk%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvFWrtLk%3D] 10.1021/ic9812095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan ZY, Mo XL, Chen GR, Lu JG: Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci.. 2003, 5: 72. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtF2lsg%3D%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtF2lsg%3D%3D]Google Scholar