Characterisation and Skin Distribution of Lecithin-Based Coenzyme Q10-Loaded Lipid Nanocapsules
© The Author(s) 2010
Received: 10 March 2010
Accepted: 29 June 2010
Published: 20 July 2010
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the inner lipid ratio on the physicochemical properties and skin targeting of surfactant-free lecithin-based coenzyme Q10-loaded lipid nanocapsules (CoQ10-LNCs). The smaller particle size of CoQ10-LNCs was achieved by high pressure and a lower ratio of CoQ10/GTCC (Caprylic/capric triglyceride); however, the zeta potential of CoQ10-LNCs was above /− 60 mV/ with no distinct difference among them at different ratios of CoQ10/GTCC. Both the crystallisation point and the index decreased with the decreasing ratio of CoQ10/GTCC and smaller particle size; interestingly, the supercooled state of CoQ10-LNCs was observed at particle size below about 200 nm, as verified by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in one heating–cooling cycle. The lecithin monolayer sphere structure of CoQ10-LNCs was investigated by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM). The skin penetration results revealed that the distribution of Nile red-loaded CoQ10-LNCs depended on the ratio of inner CoQ10/GTCC; moreover, epidermal targeting and superficial dermal targeting were achieved by the CoQ10-LNCs application. The highest fluorescence response was observed at a ratio of inner CoQ10/GTCC of 1:1. These observations suggest that lecithin-based LNCs could be used as a promising topical delivery vehicle for lipophilic compounds.
KeywordsCoenzyme Q10 Cryo-TEM DSC Topical delivery Lipid nanocapsules
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a vitamin-like substance with a yellow-coloured crystalline powder form and the melting point of 49°C, is widely biosynthesised in living organisms such as plants and animals . It has been found in virtually all cells of the human body, including the heart, liver and skeletal muscles . Initially, it became a popular supplement due to participation in two major physiological activities: as a mitochondrial electron-transporter in the high-energy metabolic pathways of liver cells and other cells of the body and as an antioxidant against free radicals and lipid peroxidation [3–5]. Recently, CoQ10, as a cutaneous antioxidant and energiser, had been demonstrated to prevent photoaging in topical application. It not only penetrates into the viable epidermis and reduces the level of oxidation and wrinkle depth but also reduces the detrimental effects of ultraviolet A (UVA) on dermal fibroblasts, which maintain the dermal matrix. To be able to act as a cutaneous antioxidant and energiser, CoQ10 needs to penetrate into the above living layers [6, 7].
However, stratum corneum acts as an effective barrier to many compounds [8, 9]. Regarding the skin barrier, several delivery carriers, such as solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) [10–12], nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) [13–15], nanoemulsions (NE) [16, 17], microemulsions [18, 19], liposomes [20, 21] and niosomes [22, 23], have been developed and focused on drug absorption and targeting. NLC formulation has been proven to be a suitable colloidal carrier for epidermal targeting, and the degree of epidermal targeting depended on the oil content and the occlusion factor . It was reported that, following SLN dispersion, dye penetration increased by about fourfold over the uptake obtained following cream application. NLC proved to be less potent (less than threefold increase), and penetration even appeared reduced when applying an NE . Podophyllotoxin-loaded SLN, stabilised by 1.5% soybean lecithin and 0.5% poloxamer 188, provided a good epidermal targeting effect . Interestingly, lecithin microemulsion has shown the highest deposition of fluorescent dye in the dermis layer as the time of treatment increased due to the presence of lecithin , but has shown no significant difference in the epidermis layer. Recently, lipid nanocapsules, a medium-chain triglyceride core surrounded by a membrane made from a mixture of lecithin and a PEGylated surfactant, were invented based on the above delivery carrier systems as an intravenous delivery system for application of lipophilic drugs. The lipid nanocapsules were prepared by phase-inversion temperature method. The selection of surfactant and the preparation temperature were the key factors and were difficult to control. The relative amount of surfactant to lipid core content had potential cytotoxicity. However, tissue targeting of lipid nanocapsules was investigated [28–33].
In this study, aimed to establish a delivery system that can target CoQ10 to the dermis layer and the epidermis layer, surfactant-free CoQ10-loaded lipid nanocapsules (CoQ10-LNCs), composed of the lamellar shell of lecithin and an inner lipid core of CoQ10 and GTCC, were developed by high-pressure homogenisation at a high temperature. Varying ratio of CoQ10/GTCC, CoQ10-LNC physicochemical properties, particle size and zeta potential, degree of crystallisation and micromorphology structure were investigated. Furthermore, targeting of CoQ10-LNCs was determined on rat skin in vivo using Nile red as the fluorescence model.
Materials and Method
Soybean lecithin was purchased from Cargill Texturizing Solutions Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG. (Germany), CoQ10 was purchased from Zhejiang Medicine Co. Ltd., Xinchang Pharmaceutical Factory (China), Nile red (NR) was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (USA). 2-Propanol and optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT) were purchased from Leica Microsystem (Germany). Caprylic/capric triglyceride (GTCC) was provided by Croda Co. Ltd. (UK).Glycerol, ethane and hexane were reagent grade.
Preparation of CoQ10-Loaded Lipid Nanocapsules
CoQ10-LNCs were prepared according to the process described by Huynh et al. , including several changes. The content of CoQ10 was varied from 100% (w/w) to 0% (w/w) in the lipid (CoQ10 and GTCC), and the amount of lipid (CoQ10 and GTCC) was kept at a fixed concentration of 12.5% (w/w) with regard to the total mass of 100 g. Briefly, CoQ10 and GTCC were mixed at 60°C, and then 5% (w/w) lecithin was dissolved into. Next, the above liquid lipid phase was dispersed in 82.5% (w/w) glycerol aqueous solution (glycerol concentration was 40% (w/w)) at 60°C and emulsified by a stirrer at 1500 rpm for 1 min. Lastly, the resulting pre-emulsion was homogenised by high-pressure homogenisation (HPH, NS1001L, Niro Soavi, Italy) at 60°C for 3 cycles at 300 bar, 600 bar and 1000 bar, respectively. The resulting dispersion was cooled at ambient conditions to room temperature to obtain the CoQ10-LNCs.
Particle Size Analysis
The mean particle size (MPZ) was analysed by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) using a Malvern Zetasizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments, UK). The MPZ was obtained by averaging three measurements at an angle of 90° in 1-cm diameter cells at 25°C. All of the samples were diluted with distilled water about 50 times.
Zeta Potential Analysis
Malvern Zetasizer 2000 was used to measure the zeta potential (ZP) of CoQ10-LNCs. The value of ZP was obtained by averaging three measurements at 25°C. All the samples were diluted with distilled water about 200 times.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
where, ΔH represents the melting enthalpy (J/g).
Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM)
In this experiment, all the samples were diluted with distilled water about five times. For Cryo-TEM, 4 μl of sample were applied onto a perforated carbon film grid (R1.2/1.3 Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Jena, Germany) and were blotted by filter paper (Whatman 1 μ) for about 3 s. After blotting, the grid was immediately plunged into pre-cooled liquid ethane for flash freezing. The Cryo-grid was held in a Gatan 626 cryo-holder (Gatan, USA) and transferred into TEM (JEOL JEM-2010 with 200 kV LaB6 filament) at −172°C. The sample was observed under minimal dose condition at −172°C. The micrographs were recorded by a Gatan 832 CCD camera at a magnification of 10,000–50,000 × and at a defocus of 3–5.46 μm.
Skin Permeation Studies in vivo
Treatment of Animals
Fifteen ten-week-old female SD rats (200–250 g, Vitalriver Inc., Beijing, China), in similar development stages, were selected as the animal model. They were anaesthetised by a suitable dose of barbital sodium throughout the entire experiment. The fur on the abdominal area of the rats was carefully removed by an electrical shaver to avoid damage to their stratum corneum. The furless abdominal area was used for in vivo transport studies.
For each set of experiments, 50 mg of sample was well distributed on the hairless abdominal skin area of approximately 3.14 cm2. At a fixed time after application, surplus sample was removed from the skin surface, and the skin surface was washed three times with PBS and dried gently under cold wind with an electric hair drier. A 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm skin piece was cut out from the treated area, embedded in OCT and frozen rapidly by liquid nitrogen. The specimen, taken out from liquid nitrogen, was frozen on a metal block. The metal block was then transferred into a cryostat microtome (LE ICACM 1850, Germany) for slicing the vertical cross-sections of skin. Twelve vertical skin sections with a thickness of 25 μm were obtained and stored at 4°C until microscopy analysis.
Skin sections were subjected to fluorescent microscopy using an Olympus CK40 microscope (Olympus, Japan) equipped with a UV source and a filter for fluorescent measurement. Image capture and analysis were carried out by Image-pro plus software (Media Cybernetics, USA). The excitation and emission wavelengths were 549 and 628 nm for NR. We selected green light and red light as excitation and emission ranges, respectively. Images were recorded by setting the camera integration time to 1/1.8 s. The same parameters were used for imaging all samples. Fluorescence intensity values were quantified using Image-pro plus software.
All the data tests were repeated three times and expressed as the mean ± SD. The statistical data were analysed by t-test analysis via Origin 7.0; p < 0.01 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results and Discussion
Particle Size and Zeta Potential of CoQ10-LNCs
Mean particle size (MPZ) of CoQ10-LNCs after being produced for three cycles at 300 bar/600 bar/1000 bar, respectively (n = 3)
CoQ10 (w/w %)
GTCC (w/w %)
414 ± 15
192 ± 3
98 ± 6
343 ± 16
181 ± 6
82 ± 8
313 ± 9
174 ± 2
78 ± 5
317 ± 4
175 ± 9
76 ± 3
298 ± 2
141 ± 4
71 ± 11
Zeta potential (ZP) of CoQ10-LNCs analysed by Zetasizer 2000 after being homogenised at 1000 bar for three cycles (n = 3)
−64.5 ± 0.8
−66.2 ± 1.1
−65.3 ± 0.5
−65.5 ± 1.8
−62.2 ± 1.2
DSC parameters of GTCC and CoQ10 in the bulk GTCC, CoQ10 and CoQ10-LNCs 3 days after being produced for three cycles at 300 bar/600 bar/1000 bar, respectively
Melting point (°C)
Melting point (°C)
Compared to bulk GTCC, the formulations without any homogenisation showed a melting peak. Both melting point and CI of GTCC in the formulation decreased with decreasing concentration of GTCC. When the homogenisation pressure was 300 bars, the melting point of GTCC decreased by large amounts for changes in the formulation with the same composition, excluded the formulation CoQ10-LNCs-75 (25% GTCC). The same phenomena were observed at 600 bars. However, the melting point of GTCC is absent in the formulation CoQ10-LNCs-75. Interestingly, when the homogenisation pressure was 1000 bar, the DSC parameters were similar to the ones at 600 bars.
On the cooling curves, without any homogenisation pressure, the crystallisation point of GTCC declined from −44.34 (100% GTCC) to −49.9°C (75% GTCC). When the concentration of GTCC decreased to 50%, the crystallisation point decreased to below −60°C, the possible reason being that CoQ10 molecule entered into the structure of GTCC and disturbed the ordered structure of GTCC . When the concentration of CoQ10 increased to 25%, one broadened crystallisation peak at about −35°C was present on the cooling curves, possibly representing the co-melting complex of GTCC/CoQ10. When the concentration of CoQ10 increased to 50%, one narrow crystallisation peak (−30.89°C) and two weak crystallisation peaks (−22.75 and −10.08°C) were present. When the concentration of CoQ10 increased to 75%, one relatively narrow crystallisation peak (−31.21°C) and one broadened strong peak (−9.28°C) was shown on the cooling curves. Compared to pure CoQ10 (0% GTCC), the depression of the crystallisation point of CoQ10 may be explained by the GTCC molecule entering into the structure of CoQ10 resulted in less ordered crystal structure of CoQ10 during the cooling process , delaying the crystallisation point. However, after high-pressure homogenisation (above 300 bar), the crystallisation peaks of CoQ10 and of the co-melting complex of GTCC/CoQ10 were absent, indicating a supercooled state due to the effect of nanosize particles. From the above result, the crystallisation point of CoQ10-LNCs depended mainly on the size of the particles; when the size reached down to about 200 nm, no crystallisation of CoQ10 was present, indicating supercooled state. Supercooled nanoparticles were potentially more stable with respect to nanoparticles recrystallisation over other types of lipid nanoparticles like fat emulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles .
Skin Penetration Study
The significant extent of skin penetration was most likely attributed to the fact that nanoparticles provided superior skin hydration, which was helpful for improving the permeation effect . Assuming that the average width of transepidermal hydrophilic pathway is up to about 100 nm as the intercorneocyte space, it is conceivable for nanosize particles to traverse through the intercorneocyte spaces [50, 51]. Moreover, an increase in penetration extent may result from an alteration in the barrier properties and a greater degree of partitioning of the LNCs into the stratum corneum and was closely related to the nature of surfactant . Previous investigations on the mechanism of transdermal permeation of phospholipid microemulsion indicate that phospholipids mainly increased the fluidity of the intercellular lipids of the stratum corneum, which led to enhancement of percutaneous permeation of drugs [49, 53].
Surfactant-free CoQ10-LNCs, composed of lecithin, CoQ10 and GTCC, were successfully prepared by high-pressure homogenisation. Particle size was the primary influencing factor on the CI of CoQ10, while the ratio of CoQ10/GTCC was the key factor affecting the crystallisation point of CoQ10. When the particle size of CoQ10-LNCs reached about 400 nm, the CI of CoQ10 was reduced to less than 3%; when the size further decreased to about 200 nm, no enthalpy was present. From the cooling process, the supercooled state of CoQ10 was maintained even at a lower temperature (−40°C). The lecithin monolayer structure of CoQ10-LNCs was investigated via the Cryo-TEM method. CoQ10-LNCs structured with a lecithin monolayer sphere have been investigated to be a suitable delivery system for both epidermal targeting and superficial dermal targeting; moreover, the degree of distribution depended on the ratio of CoQ10/GTCC.
The authors are grateful for Cryo-TEM support by Qinfen Zhang from BioEM lab, State Key Lab of Biocontrol, School of life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen Universtity, Guangzhou, 510275.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Nohl H, Gille L, Staniek K: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.. 1998, 854: 394. ; COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjtVehtg%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1998NYASA.854..394N] 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09919.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aberg F, Appelkvist E, Dallner G, Ernster L: Arch. Biochem. Biophys.. 1992, 295: 230. COI number [1:STN:280:DyaK383msVOitQ%3D%3D] 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90511-TView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lenaz G, Fato R, Castelluccio C, Cavazzoni M, Estornell E, Huertas JF, Pallotti F, Parenti Castelli G, Rauchova H: Mol. Aspects Med.. 1994, 15: s29. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXktlymsrs%3D] 10.1016/0098-2997(94)90010-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crane FL: J. Am. Coll. Nutr.. 2001, 20: 591. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ernster L, Dallner G: Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1995, 1271: 195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoppe U, Bergemann J, Diembeck W, Ennen J, Gohla S, Harris I, Jacob J, Kielholz J, Mei W, Pollet D, Schachtschabel D, Sauermann G, Schreiner V, Stab F, Steckel F: Biofactors. 1999, 9: 371. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXkt12mt7g%3D] 10.1002/biof.5520090238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shindo Y, Witt E, Han D, Epstein W, Packer L: J. Invest. Dermatol.. 1994, 102: 122. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXhtlSgtL4%3D] 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12371744View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen J: Exp. Dermatol.. 2008, 17: 1063. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wertz PW: Acta. Derm. Venereol. Suppl. (Stockh). 2000, 208: 7. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fjt1Oqtg%3D%3D] 10.1080/000155500750042790View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenning V, Gysler A, Schafer-Korting M, Gohla SH: Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.. 2000, 49: 211. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXivVGmtbo%3D] 10.1016/S0939-6411(99)00075-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanna V, Gavini E, Cossu M, Rassu G, Giunchedi P: J. Pharm. Pharmacol.. 2007, 59: 1057. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVWntL%2FL] 10.1211/jpp.59.8.0002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou HF, Ma QH, Xia Q, Yan Y, Gu N, Miao X, Lu D: Solid State Phenom.. 2007, 121–123: 271. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.121-123.271View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Souto EB, Muller RH: Pharmazie. 2006, 61: 431. Google Scholar
- Zhou HF, Ma QH, Ding Y, Xia Q, Kuang YZ, Hao XZ, Gu N: Chin. J. Process Eng.. 2006, 6: 598. Google Scholar
- Xia Q, Saupe A, Mueller RH, Souto EBEU: Int. J. Cosmet. Sci.. 2007, 29: 473. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXkvVCmtA%3D%3D] 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2007.00410.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shakeel F, Ramadan W, Ahmed MA: J. Drug Target.. 2009, 17: 435. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnt1Sju7s%3D] 10.1080/10611860902963021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou HF, Yue Y, Liu GL, Li Y, Zhang J, Gong Q, Yan ZM, Duan MX: Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2010, 5: 224. ; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..224Z] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs12n]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..224Z] 10.1007/s11671-009-9469-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peltola S, Saarinen-Savolainen R, Kiesvaara J, Suhonen TM, Urtti A: Int. J. Pharm.. 2003, 254: 99. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhsFOrtLs%3D] 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00632-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peira E, Chirio D, Carlotti ME, Spagnolo R, Trotta M: J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.. 2009, 19: 191. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sentjurc M, Vrhovnik K, Kristl J: J. Control. Release. 1999, 59: 87. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXisVOntbs%3D] 10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00181-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmid MH, Korting HC: Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug. 1994, 11: 97. Google Scholar
- Choi MJ, Maibach HI: Skin Pharmacol. Physiol.. 2005, 18: 209. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXnvFygtbo%3D] 10.1159/000086666View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balakrishnana P, Shanmugam S, Lee WS, Lee WM, Kim JO, Oh DH, Kim DD, Kim JS, Yoo BK, Choi HG, Woo JS, Yong CS: Int. J. Pharm.. 2009, 377: 1. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teeranachaideekul V, Boonme P, Souto EB, Muller RH, Junyaprasert VB: J. Control. Release. 2008, 128: 134. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlvFKqt7k%3D] 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.02.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lombardi Borgia S, Regehly M, Sivaramakrishnan R, Mehnert W, Korting HC, Danker K, Röder B, Kramer KD, Schäfer-Korting M: J. Control. Release. 2005, 110: 151. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1KlurrJ] 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Chang X, Du D, Liu W, Liu J, Weng T, Yang Y, Xu H, Yang X: J. Control. Release. 2006, 110: 296. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtlert7jK] 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Changez M, Chander J, Dinda AK: Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2006, 48: 58. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XitVakt7g%3D] 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.01.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huynh NT, Passirani C, Saulnier P, Benoit JP: Int. J. Pharm.. 2009, 379: 201. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVKjsr%2FF] 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allard E, Huynh NT, Vessieres A, Pigeon P, Jaouen G, Benoit J, Passirani C: Int. J. Pharm.. 2009, 379: 317. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVKjsr3J] 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dhanikula AB, Khalid NM, Lee SD, Yeung R, Risovic V, Wasan KM, Leroux JC: Biomaterials. 2007, 28: 1248. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xht1Kiu7fF] 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoarau D, Delmas P, David S, Roux E, Leroux JC: Pharm. Res.. 2004, 21: 1783. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1WqtL0%3D] 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000045229.87844.21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lacoeuillel F, Garcion E, Benoit JP, Lamprecht A: J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.. 2007, 7: 4612.Google Scholar
- Barras A, Mezzetti A, Richard A, Lazzaroni S, Roux S, Melnyk P, Betbeder D, Monfilliette-Dupont N: Int. J. Pharm.. 2009, 379: 270. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVKjsrzF] 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.054View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han F, Li S, Yin R, Liu H, Xu L: Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2008, 315: 210. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltVWh] 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.08.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floury J, Desrumaux A, Lardières J: Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.. 2000, 1: 127. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotVers78%3D] 10.1016/S1466-8564(00)00012-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu F, Jiang S, Du Y, Yuan H, Ye Y, Zeng S: Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2005, 45: 167. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVymsrvP] 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.08.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freitas C, Müller RH: Int. J. Pharm.. 1998, 168: 221. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXksF2ls7o%3D] 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00092-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann E, Souto EB, Muller RH: Pharmazie. 2005, 60: 508. Google Scholar
- Wissing SA, Muller RH, Manthei L, Mayer C: Pharm. Res.. 2004, 21: 400. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvF2lsb8%3D] 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000019291.36636.c1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Westesen K, Bunjes H: Int. J. Pharm.. 1995, 115: 129. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXjs1GjtLg%3D] 10.1016/0378-5173(94)00347-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenning V, Thunemann AF, Gohla SH: Int. J. Pharm.. 2000, 199: 167. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjtVWqsrc%3D] 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00378-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuntsche V, Koch MHJ, Fahr A, Bunjes H: Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.. 2009, 38: 238. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFGqtL%2FO] 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.07.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saupe A, Gordon KC, Rades T: Int. J. Pharm.. 2006, 314: 56. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xjslyjs7c%3D] 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.01.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spernath L, Regev O, Levi-Kalisman Y, Magdassi S: Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2009, 332: 19. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVertbvK] 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.08.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waninge R, Nylander T, Paulsson M, Bergenstahl B: Colloids Surf. B Biointerf.. 2003, 31: 257. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXms12jur4%3D] 10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00145-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira DA, Bentley M, Karlsson G, Edwards K: Int. J. Pharm.. 2006, 310: 203. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhslKht7g%3D] 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.11.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greenspan P, Mayer EP, Fowler SD: J. Cell Biol.. 1985, 100: 965. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXhsVGmtb4%3D] 10.1083/jcb.100.3.965View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez-Roman R, Naik A, Kalia YN, Fessi H, Guy RH: Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.. 2004, 58: 301. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmsVGns7o%3D] 10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunt HB, Kasting GB: Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.. 2007, 32: 254. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXht12jt7%2FJ] 10.1016/j.ejps.2007.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barry BW: Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.. 2001, 14: 101. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlslGnsLY%3D] 10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00167-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cevc G: Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.. 2004, 56: 675. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvFWqsbk%3D] 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barry BW: Nat. Biotechnol.. 2004, 22: 165. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnvFejsw%3D%3D] 10.1038/nbt0204-165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dreher F, Walde P, Walther P, Wehrli E: J. Control. Release. 1997, 45: 131. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XnsFSktb4%3D] 10.1016/S0168-3659(96)01559-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar