Synthesis and Application of Carbon–Iron Oxide Microspheres’ Black Pigments in Electrophoretic Displays
© The Author(s) 2010
Received: 21 June 2010
Accepted: 1 July 2010
Published: 15 July 2010
Carbon–iron oxide microspheres’ black pigments (CIOMBs) had been prepared via ultrasonic spray pyrolysis of aqueous solutions containing ferrous chloride and glucose. Due to the presence of carbon, CIOMBs not only exhibited remarkably acid resistance, but also could be well dispersed in both polar solvents and nonpolar solvent. Finally, dispersions of hollow CIOMBs in tetrachloroethylene had successfully been applied in electrophoretic displays.
KeywordsE-paper Pigment Black Carbon
Electrophoretic displays (EPDs) have been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years [1–5]. In such displays, pigments are dispersed as a colloidal suspension in a colored solvent, which is placed in a narrow space between two transparent electrodes. By applying an electric field to the suspension, the charged pigments can be moved through the fluid. When the field is applied in one direction, the pigments move toward the observer and the pixel has the color of the pigments. When the field is applied in the opposite direction, the ITO electrode closest to the observer is covered with colored solvent. Just like printed paper, EPDs are lightweight, flexible and easy to read in all lighting conditions [6–9]. Above of all, they provide an important improvement in the field of power consumption: due to the bistability of the pigments, an image is retained on the display without the need for constant refreshment. Their properties make them the most likely candidate in the search for a display that combines the benefits of printed paper and an image display. EPDs are now used in consumer products such as the Amazon Kindle or Sony E-Reader. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image quality of the displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, pigments that make up EPDs tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service life for the displays [10–13].
The change in the appearance of a pixel of the EPDs is solely due to the change of the position of the pigments within the suspension. Thus, the pigments play a vital role on the speed and efficiency of the EPDs. For a white/black display cell, the white particles are typically titanium oxide because of its relatively high refractive index of 2.7, which leads to excellent scattering properties . Generally, carbon black is the material of choice to produce the black color in most applications. However, carbon black has a complex and poorly understood surface chemistry, which may vary widely with the specific raw material and the exact process used for the carbon black production. Furthermore, carbon black has a poorly understood aggregate, fractal structure. It has also been discovered that carbon black has a low density (0.8 g/cm3), which is not matched to that of the usual suspending medium (about 1.7 g/cm3) . There is thus a need for black particle with proper density and surface chemistry for used in EPDs that can be compatible with the suspending fluid.
Herein, we demonstrate that carbon–iron oxide microspheres’ black pigments (CIOMBs) are formed via ultrasonic spray pyrolysis of the aqueous solutions containing FeCl2 and glucose. Different from the formation process of carbon powders, in situ-formed iron oxide nanoparticles are introduced as surface chemistry and density modification component to form carbon–iron oxide composites. The density of the CIOMBs can be easily tuned in the range of 1.5–2.2 g/cm3 by acid etching, which resolved the problem of mismatched density between carbon-based black pigment and electrophoretic medium. The CIOMBs can be well dispersed in various solvents including polar solvents (water, methanol, ethanol, etc.) and nonpolar solvent (e.g. tetrachloroethylene) due to their surfaces are functionalized with abundant functional groups such as OH, COH and CH2. The CIOMBs can be used as effective black electrophoretic particle for electrophoretic displays.
Ferrous chloride (FeCl2), glucose, and HCl solution (12 M), titania, DISERBYK-161 were purchased and used without further purification. Deionized water was used throughout this work.
The USP experimental setup is similar to that of Suslick’s group [16–19]. In a typical experiment, 0.5 mol/L glucose and 0.8 mol/L FeCl2 were added to deionized water so as to form a precursor solution under magnetic stirring. For nebulization, a Yuyue household ultrasonic humidifier was used to nebulize a precursor solution into a fine mist. The furnace temperature was set as 700°C with a nitrogen flow rate of 2 SLPM (Standard Liters per Minute). After 1 h of collection into water-filled beaker, the black product was collected with a magnet. After washed with deionized water and then ethanol three more times, the black sample was collected for further analysis.
In order to tune the density of CIOMBs, as-prepared CIOMBs were immersed in concentrated HCl (12 M) at room temperature for 1–12 h. The content of iron oxide in the composite dissolve in the concentrated HCl gradually, which leads to decrease in the CIOMBs’ density. Furthermore, CIOMBs were washed with deionized water and then ethanol three more times, and the black sample was collected for further analysis.
Electrophoretic dispersions were prepared via dispersing of CIOMBs (0.05 g/mL) and titania (0.10 g/mL) in tetrachloroethylene using DISERBYK-161 (0.01 g/mL) as a dispersant. It is then introduced in an electrophoretic cell, composed of two ITO-coated glasses (3.0 × 7.0 cm) sealed with 75 μm thickness, and the electrode area was prepared by a photoetching technique. The cell is operated using a Keithley 230 programmable power source.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on Rigaku Dmax2000 with Cu Kα radiation. The morphology of the samples was examined by scanning (SEM, XL30ESEM FEG) and transmission (TEM, JEOL 2010) electron microscopy. Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FT-IR) of the samples was recorded at the ambient temperature on a Nigolet 560 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer with the resolution factor of ±0.1 cm−1.
Results and Discussions
In the present route, ultrasound is used to produce aerosol droplets dispersed in nitrogen via ultrasonic spray treatment of precursor aqueous solution. The aerosol droplets are carried in nitrogen stream through a quartz-glass tube in a hot furnace, and water evaporation and precursor decomposition occur, generating CIOMBs. With USP, the aerosol droplets will act as individual micrometer-sized chemical reactors to impose morphology control on the target products.
The possible formation mechanism of CIOMBs can be illustrated as follows: (1) Carbonaceous nanoparticles loaded with Fe2+/Fe3+ ion are generated via the catalyzing of Fe2+[20, 21]; (2) With the furnace temperature increasing, carbon-coated iron oxide nanoparticles will be formed via the oxidization of iron ion, accompanying by the further carbonization of carbonaceous components with the catalysis of in situ-formed iron oxide ; (3) With the reaction time prolonging, more carbon will be formed in the neighborhood of aforementioned iron oxide nanoparticles via the carbonization of glucose. When the initial concentration of FeCl2 is low, as-produced CIOMBs display smooth surface, in which iron oxide nanoparticles are randomly dispersed in the carbon spheres (Fig. 1a). When the initial concentration of FeCl2 is high enough, as-produced CIOMBs display rough surface due to aforementioned iron oxide nanoparticles tend to agglomerate to form iron oxide-rich core (Fig. 1b–1d). With the reaction time prolonging, subsequently generated carbon will be formed carbon shell around the iron oxide-rich core.
As demonstrated in the previous literatures, both crude carbon blacks and crude carbon nanotubes are hard dispersed in either polar or nonpolar solvents. In the case of carbon spheres obtained via the dehydration of polysaccharides aqueous solution under hydrothermal conditions (<200°C), they exhibit excellent dispersibility in polar solvents including water and ethanol. However, they are also hard to disperse in nonpolar solvent such as tetrachloroethylene. The dispersibility of CIOMBs is investigated via dispersing CIOMBs in various solvents. Poor dispersion usually limits their application in EPDs. It is well known that surface’s functional groups play important roles in the process of dispersion. As shown in Fig. 3, there are abundant functional groups (OH, COH, CH2, etc.) on the surface of CIOMBs, which lead to good dispersibility in various solvents. The CIOMBs not only can be dispersed in polar solvents (i.e. water, methanol and ethanol), but also can be dispersed in nonpolar solvent, such as tetrachloroethylene. The proved surface chemistry makes CIOMB a versatile black pigment for EPDs.
In summary, using aqueous solutions containing ferrous chloride and glucose as precursors, a simple and continuous strategy is developed to synthesize CIOMBs via USP. Due to the presence of affluent functional groups in their surface, CIOMBs can be dispersed in water, methanol, ethanol and tetrachloroethylene. By adjusting the concentrated HCl etching duration, the density of CIOMBs can be tuned to match that of tetrachloroethylene. The surface chemistry and density of as-prepared CIOMBs are appropriate for EPDs assembly. An EPD is formed using CIOMBs as black electrophoretic particles in tetrachloroethylene.
This work was financially supported by the National Hi-Tech 863 Programme (2009AA03Z302), National Science Foundation of China (60736001, 60907042), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2093044).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Comiskey B, Albert JD, Hidekazu Y, Joseph J: Nature. 1998, 394: 253. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXkvVGqtrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1998Natur.394..253C] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXkvVGqtrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1998Natur.394..253C] 10.1038/28349View Article
- Hayes RA, Feenstra BJ: Nature. 2003, 425: 383. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnsV2ktL4%3D]; Bibcode number [2003Natur.425..383H] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnsV2ktL4%3D]; Bibcode number [2003Natur.425..383H] 10.1038/nature01988View Article
- Arsenault AC, Puzzo DP, Manners I, Ozin GA: Nat. Photonics. 2007, 1: 468. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsVentrw%3D]; Bibcode number [2007NaPho...1..468A] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsVentrw%3D]; Bibcode number [2007NaPho...1..468A] 10.1038/nphoton.2007.140View Article
- Puzzo DP, Arsenault AC, Manners I, Ozin GA: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2008, 47: 1. 10.1002/anie.200790254View Article
- Yu DG, An JH, Bae JY, Ahn SD, Kang SY, Suh KS: Macromolecules. 2005, 38: 7485. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsVymt78%3D]; Bibcode number [2005MaMol..38.7485Y] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsVymt78%3D]; Bibcode number [2005MaMol..38.7485Y] 10.1021/ma035613lView Article
- Wang JP, Zhao XP, Guo HL: Opt. Mater.. 2008, 30: 1268. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjsF2hsrY%3D]; Bibcode number [2008OptMa..30.1268W] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjsF2hsrY%3D]; Bibcode number [2008OptMa..30.1268W] 10.1016/j.optmat.2007.05.057View Article
- Wang YT, Zhao XP, Wang DW: J. Microencapsul.. 2006, 23: 762. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFektg%3D%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFektg%3D%3D] 10.1080/02652040600788197View Article
- Chen Y, Wang X, Liang RC 2009. US Pat. 7564614B2
- Kang HS, Cha HJ, Kim JC: Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.. 2007, 472: 247. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFeiu7jN] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFeiu7jN] 10.1080/15421400701547920View Article
- Honeyman CH, Moran EA, Zhang L, Pullen AE, Pratt EJ, Houde KL, King MA, Herb CA, Paolini RJ 2004. US Pat. 6822782B2
- Pullen AE, Whitesides TH, Honeyman CH, Comiskey B, Albert JD 2006. US Pat. 7002728B2
- Meng XW, Tang FQ, Peng B, Ren J: Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2010, 5: 174. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs1yk]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..174M] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhs1yk]; Bibcode number [2010NRL.....5..174M] 10.1007/s11671-009-9461-0View Article
- Werts MPL, Brochon C, Hadziioannou G: Chem. Mater.. 2008, 20: 1292. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjt1aruw%3D%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjt1aruw%3D%3D] 10.1021/cm071197yView Article
- Peng B, Tang FQ, Chen D, Ren XL, Meng XW, Ren J: J. Colloid Interface Sci.. 2009, 329: 62. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlCkt7jK] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlCkt7jK] 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.069View Article
- Pullen AE, Whitesides TH, Honeyman CH, Comiskey B, Albert JD 2007. US Pat. 7247379B2
- Didenko YT, Suslick KS: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 12196. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXntlSjtr0%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXntlSjtr0%3D] 10.1021/ja054124tView Article
- Skrabalak SE, Suslick KS: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2006, 128: 12642. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XptlOksrY%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XptlOksrY%3D] 10.1021/ja064899hView Article
- Skrabalak SE, Suslick KS: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007, 111: 17807. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntFOjsr4%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntFOjsr4%3D] 10.1021/jp071241xView Article
- Bang JH, Han K, Skrabalak SE, Kim H, Suslick KS: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007, 111: 10959. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntFegt7g%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntFegt7g%3D] 10.1021/jp071624vView Article
- Cui XJ, Antonietti M, Yu SH: Small. 2006, 2: 756. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XkslOmsb8%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XkslOmsb8%3D] 10.1002/smll.200600047View Article
- Titirici MM, Antonietti M, Thomas A: Chem. Mater.. 2006, 18: 3808. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsVKmtr8%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsVKmtr8%3D] 10.1021/cm052768uView Article
- Sun XM, Li YD: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2004, 43: 597. 10.1002/anie.200352386View Article
- Cao FY, Chen CL, Wang Q, Chen QW: Carbon. 2007, 45: 727. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlWitL8%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlWitL8%3D] 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.030View Article