# Frequency Shift of Carbon-Nanotube-Based Mass Sensor Using Nonlocal Elasticity Theory

- Haw-Long Lee
^{1}, - Jung-Chang Hsu
^{1}and - Win-Jin Chang
^{1}Email author

**5**:1774

**DOI: **10.1007/s11671-010-9709-8

© The Author(s) 2010

**Received: **15 May 2010

**Accepted: **19 July 2010

**Published: **1 August 2010

## Abstract

The frequency equation of carbon-nanotube-based cantilever sensor with an attached mass is derived analytically using nonlocal elasticity theory. According to the equation, the relationship between the frequency shift of the sensor and the attached mass can be obtained. When the nonlocal effect is not taken into account, the variation of frequency shift with the attached mass on the sensor is compared with the previous study. According to this study, the result shows that the frequency shift of the sensor increases with increasing the attached mass. When the attached mass is small compared with that of the sensor, the nonlocal effect is obvious and increasing nonlocal parameter decreases the frequency shift of the sensor. In addition, when the location of the attached mass is closer to the free end, the frequency shift is more significant and that makes the sensor reveal more sensitive. When the attached mass is small, a high sensitivity is obtained.

### Keywords

Carbon nanotube Mass sensor Nonlocal elasticity theory Frequency shift## Introduction

Carbon nanotube (CNT) have many potential applications in nanobiological devices and nanomechanical systems because of excellent mechanical properties, chemical and thermal stability, and hollow geometry [1–4]. In addition, the CNT is ultralight and is highly sensitive to its environment changes. Therefore, many researchers have explored the potential of using CNT as nanomechanical resonators in atomic-scale mass sensor [5–7]. For example, Chiu et al. [6] utilized the detection of shifts in the resonance frequency of the nanotubes to measure nanotube resonator vibration characteristics.

The atomic-scale mass sensing with a resonator is based on the fact that the resonant frequency is sensitive to the attached mass. The attached mass causes a shift to the resonant frequency of resonator. In addition, the shift in resonant frequency is associated with the location of attached mass. To analyze the effects of adsorbed mass and its location on the resonant frequency of CNT, the continuum models based on beam as well as shell was used [8]. Recently, Dai et al. [9] studied the nanomechanical mass detection using nonlinear oscillators based on continuum elastic model and obtained that nonlinear oscillation leads to the unique resonant frequency shift due to mass adsorption, quite different from that in harmonic oscillation. The ultimate goal of a resonator sensor is single molecule detection capability. Chowdhury et al. [10] presented an equivalent approximation model to analyze frequency shift of a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) due to an attached particle fixed at a location.

It is more useful for a mass sensor to simultaneously detect the mass and position of the attached particle. In this Letter, frequency shift of carbon-nanotube-based sensor with an attached mass is studied using nonlocal elasticity theory, which is a modified classical elasticity theory. This theory with long-range interactions is often applied to analyze the vibration behaviour of CNT [11–13]. In addition, the effects of nonlocal parameter, attached mass and its location on the frequency shift of a cantilevered SWCNT are analyzed.

## Analysis

*M*located at

*c*from the fixed end is described as a cantilever beam as depicted in Fig. 1. The SWCNT with length

*L*has an equivalent bending rigidity

*EI*, the volume density

*ρ*, the cross-sectional area

*A*, and transverse displacement Y depend on the spatial coordinate

*X*and time

*t*. Based on nonlocal elasticity theory [14], the governing equation of transverse vibration for the SWCNT can be expressed as

*e*

_{0}

*a*is the nonlocal parameter, and it is used to modify the classical elasticity theory and is limited to apply to a device on the nanometer scale.

where *ω* is the angular frequency.

*x*=

*X*/

*L*, and substituting Eq. 2 into Eq. 1, one obtain

where *m* = *M*/*ρAL* and *ξ* = *c*/*L* are the dimensionless mass and position of the attached mass, respectively; *w*_{1} and *w*_{2} are the dimensionless transverse displacements on the left and right sides of the attached mass, respectively.

The boundary conditions given by Eq. 5 correspond to conditions of zero displacement and the zero slope at fixed end (*x* = 0), Eqs. 6 and 7 are zero moment and the zero shear force at free end (*x* = 1), respectively. Eqs. 8, 9, 10 and 11 are the compatibility conditions at the location of the attached mass [15].

and *C*_{1}, *C*_{2}, *C*_{3},…*C*_{8} are constants.

where is the determinant of the matrix

*σ*

_{ m }can be obtained from the following equation:

*ɛ*= 0), and assuming the attached mass at free end (

*ξ*= 1), the frequency equation for a cantilevered SWCNT with attached mass can be reduced. Then the frequency expressed in dimensionless wave number

*k*can be obtained by solving the following equation:

*m*= 0), the dimensionless wave number

*k*can be obtained from

The above frequency equation expressed in dimensionless wave number *k* for the free vibration of a cantilever beam can also be found in the textbook about vibration [16].

## Results and Discussion

*e*

_{0}

*a*/

*L*, attached mass and its location,

*c*/

*L*, on the frequency shift of carbon-nanotube-based mass sensor. According to the equation, the relationship between the dimensionless frequency shift and dimensionless added mass on the cantilever mass sensor for mode 1 with

*c*/

*L*= 1 and

*e*

_{0}

*a*/

*L*= 0 is obtained and shown in Fig. 2. The dimensionless frequency shift is defined as the ratio of the difference between the fundamental frequency of a nanotube with and without attached mass, to that without attached mass,

*f*

_{0}. To compare with a previous study, we use the same normalized mass as described in Ref. [10], where the value of parameter

*μ*is 140/33. It can be seen that the comparison of the two results shows good agreement. However, the previous work that assumes a fixed location of attached mass (i.e.,

*c*/

*L*= 1); and it is only a special case of this study. In addition, the nonlocal effect was not taken into account in their analysis (i.e.,

*e*

_{0}

*a*/

*L*= 0).

*c*/

*L*= 1. It can be seen that the frequency shift of the sensor increases with increasing the attached mass. Based on the nonlocal elasticity theory, long-range interactions are taken account in the analysis that makes the sensor stiffer. Therefore, it can be found that increasing the nonlocal parameter increases the frequency shift. The trend is obvious when the attached mass is small compared with that of the sensor.

*c*/

*L*, on the frequency shift of the cantilever mass sensor for

*e*

_{0}

*a*/

*L*= 0.3. It can be seen that the effect of the location of attached mass on the frequency shift of the mass sensor is significant. Increasing the value of

*c*/

*L*increases the frequency shift. This is because the frequency of the sensor with the attached mass decreases with increasing the particle mass. Increasing the value of

*c*/

*L*is equivalent to an increase of the particle mass at the same location.

*e*

_{0}

*a*/

*L*= 0.3. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the frequency shift is linearly downward with decreasing mass. Therefore, a high sensitivity is revealed when the attached mass is small. In addition, it can be observed that the sensitivity of the sensor is strongly dependent on the location of attached mass,

*c*/

*L*. The sensitivity of the sensor quickly drops as the value of

*c*/

*L*decreased. This is because the frequency shift decreases with decreasing the value of

*c*/

*L*.

## Conclusions

In this Letter, the frequency shift and sensitivity of carbon-nanotube-based sensor with an attached mass was studied using nonlocal elasticity theory. The relationship equation between the frequency shift of the sensor and the attached mass was derived analytically. When the nonlocal effect was not taken into account, the result was compared with the previous study, which adopted a simplified method and obtained an approximate result. According to this study, the result showed that increasing the nonlocal parameter obviously decreased the frequency shift of the sensor when the attached mass was small compared with that of the sensor. The value of frequency shift was larger when the location of the attached mass was closer to the free end. In addition, a high sensitivity of the sensor was revealed when the attached mass was small. However, the sensitivity quickly dropped as the location of the attached mass was closed to the fixed end.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China in Taiwan for providing financial support for this study under Projects NSC 99-2221-E-168-019 and NSC 99-2221-E-168-031.

**Open Access**

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Dirote EV (ed.) (Ed):
*Trends in Nanotechnology Research*. Nova Science Publishers, New York; 2004.Google Scholar - O’Connell MJ (ed.) (Ed):
*Carbon Nanotubes: Properties and Applications*. CRC Press, Boca Raton; 2006.Google Scholar - Yudasaka M, Iijima S, Crespi VH:
*Topics Appl. Phys.*. 2008,**111:**605. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltFGjsLo%3D] 10.1007/978-3-540-72865-8_19View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ottenhouse AP (ed.) (Ed):
*Carbon Nanotubes: New Research*. Nova Science Publishers, New York; 2009.Google Scholar - Garcia-Sanchez D, San Paulo A, Esplandiu MJ, Perez-Murano F, Forro′ L, Aguasca A, Bachtold A:
*Phys. Rev. Lett.*. 2007,**99:**085501. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sngslOgsA%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2007PhRvL..99h5501G] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.085501View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chiu HY, Hung P, Ch Postma HW, Bockrath M:
*Nano. Lett.*. 2008,**8:**4342. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtl2ns77O]; Bibcode number [2008NanoL...8.4342C] 10.1021/nl802181cView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Huttel AK, Steele GA, Witkamp B, Poot M, Kouwenhoven LP, van der Zant HSJ:
*Nano. Lett.*. 2009,**9:**2547. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmslejurs%3D]; Bibcode number [2009NanoL...9.2547H] 10.1021/nl900612hView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dohn S, Svendsen W, Boisen A, Hansen O:
*Rev. Sci. Inst.*. 2007,**78:**103303. COI number [1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snlsFGltA%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2007RScI...78j3303D] 10.1063/1.2804074View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dai MD, Eom K, Kim CW:
*Appl. Phys. Lett.*. 2009,**95:**203104. Bibcode number [2009ApPhL..95t3104D] 10.1063/1.3265731View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chowdhury R, Adhikari S, Mitchell J:
*Physica E*. 2009,**42:**104. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFSgs77F]; Bibcode number [2009PhyE...42..104C] 10.1016/j.physe.2009.09.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lee HL, Chang WJ:
*J. Appl. Phys.*. 2008,**103:**024302. Bibcode number [2008JAP...103b4302L] 10.1063/1.2822099View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lee HL, Chang WJ:
*J. Phys.: Cond. Matt.*. 2009,**21:**115302. Bibcode number [2009JPCM...21k5302L] 10.1088/0953-8984/21/11/115302Google Scholar - Lee HL, Chang WJ:
*Physica E*. 2009,**41:**529. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXitF2ltrY%3D]; Bibcode number [2009PhyE...41..529L] 10.1016/j.physe.2008.10.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Eringen AC:
*J. Appl. Phys.*. 1983,**54:**4703. Bibcode number [1983JAP....54.4703E] 10.1063/1.332803View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Low KH:
*Int. J. Mech. Sci.*. 2001,**43:**871. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00052-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Weaver W Jr, Timoshenko SP, Young DH:
*Vibration Problems in Engineering*. Wiley, New York; 1990.Google Scholar