Open Access

Nanoscratch Characterization of GaN Epilayers on c- and a-Axis Sapphire Substrates

  • Meng-Hung Lin1,
  • Hua-Chiang Wen2Email author,
  • Yeau-Ren Jeng3 and
  • Chang-Pin Chou1
Nanoscale Research Letters20105:1812

DOI: 10.1007/s11671-010-9717-8

Received: 13 May 2010

Accepted: 26 July 2010

Published: 7 August 2010


In this study, we used metal organic chemical vapor deposition to form gallium nitride (GaN) epilayers on c- and a-axis sapphire substrates and then used the nanoscratch technique and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine the nanotribological behavior and deformation characteristics of the GaN epilayers, respectively. The AFM morphological studies revealed that pile-up phenomena occurred on both sides of the scratches formed on the GaN epilayers. It is suggested that cracking dominates in the case of GaN epilayers while ploughing during the process of scratching; the appearances of the scratched surfaces were significantly different for the GaN epilayers on the c- and a-axis sapphire substrates. In addition, compared to the c-axis substrate, we obtained higher values of the coefficient of friction (μ) and deeper penetration of the scratches on the GaN a-axis sapphire sample when we set the ramped force at 4,000 μN. This discrepancy suggests that GaN epilayers grown on c-axis sapphire have higher shear resistances than those formed on a-axis sapphire. The occurrence of pile-up events indicates that the generation and motion of individual dislocation, which we measured under the sites of critical brittle transitions of the scratch track, resulted in ductile and/or brittle properties as a result of the deformed and strain-hardened lattice structure.


Gallium nitride Metal organic chemical vapor deposition Nanoscratch Atomic force microscopy


GaN-related III–nitride materials are highly attractive semiconductor materials because of their great potential for the development of optoelectronic devices in blue/green light emitting diodes, semiconductor lasers, and optical detectors [14]. The most common orientation of sapphire used as a substrate for GaN is c-axis sapphire. Although GaN epilayers on sapphire substrates generally exhibit a large lattice mismatch (ca. 13.9%), causing in-plane tensile strain of the sample, the lattice mismatch of the GaN films on a-axis (11 0) sapphire is less (2%) than that on c-axis (0001) sapphire (13.9%), suggesting that excellent quality GaN can be grown with improved surface morphology [5]. Furthermore, compared with bulk single crystals, the deformation properties of thin films are more strongly correlated with their geometrical dimensions and defect structure of the material. Indeed, misfit dislocations at the interface play an important role in determining such properties as carrier mobility and luminescence efficiency. Unfortunately, mechanical damages to GaN epilayers, such as film cracking and interface delamination caused by thermal stress or chemical–mechanical polishing, usually decrease the processing yield and the reliability of their applications in microelectronic devices [68]. Surface measurements have been made possible through the development of instruments that continuously measure force and displacement during the process of making an indentation [912]. Slip band movement [13, 14] and dislocation nucleation mechanisms [15] have been proposed to explain “pop-in” events. Most of these studies have been performed using c-axis GaN epilayers and bulk single crystals [16]. This nanoscratch technology, which directly processes the surfaces of materials using a diamond particle or tip of nano size, is attractive for several reasons: the free selection of materials, the simple alternation of the design principles, and the convenient initial facilities [17, 18]. The values of H (Hardness) and residual stress are two of the most significant parameters for characterizing tribological film [19, 20]. Comparisons of the nanotribological behavior of GaN epilayers grown on c- and a-axis sapphire substrates have not been reported previously in detail.

In this article, we describe our investigation into the nanotribological characterization of GaN epilayers. We investigated the pile-up-induced impairment of GaN epilayers on c- and a-axis sapphire substrates using a nanoscratch system and atomic force microscopy (AFM).

Experimental Details

The GaN epilayers used in this study were grown using metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) onto both c-plane (0001) and a-plane (11 0) sapphire substrates. To fabricate the GaN epilayers, a 10-nm-thick AlN buffer layer was grown on the sapphire substrate, and then both GaN epilayers (thickness: ca. 2 μm) were grown on top of the buffer layer through MOCVD at 1,100°C, using triethylgallium (TEGa), trimethylaluminum (TMAl), and ammonia (NH3) as the gallium, aluminum, and nitrogen sources, respectively. The GaN epilayers grown on c-plane (0001) and a-plane (11 0) sapphire had a [0001] orientation and a [1 1 0] orientation.

The nanotribological properties of GaN epilayers were determined by combining AFM (Digital Instruments Nanoscope III) together with a nanoindentation measurement system (Hysitron), operated at a constant scan speed of 2 μm s−1. For the GaN epilayer/sapphire systems, constant forces of 2,000 and 4,000 μN were applied. The maximum load was then maintained while forming 10-μm-long scratches. Surface profiles before and after scratching were obtained by scanning the tip at a 0.02-mN normal load (i.e., a load sufficiently small that it produced no measurable displacement). After scratching, the wear tracks were imaged using AFM.

Results and Discussion

The GaN epilayers were deposited onto different sapphire substrates using MOCVD. Sapphire substrate surfaces have a specific epitaxial orientation (c- and a-axis), resulting in aspect-oriented nuclei. Figure 1 presents AFM images obtained after operating the nanoscratch measurement system at ramped loads of 2,000 and 4,000 μN; the images correspond to surface profiles on the GaN epilayers. We find that the nanoscratch depth is related to both the type of GaN epilayer (c- or a-axis sapphire) and the applied ramped load. Figure 1a reveals that the surface of the GaN/c-axis sapphire underwent sample pile-up on surface areas during slip processing at a ramped load at 2,000 μN. Between the groove and the film, the surface material appears to reveal the effects of elasticity as a result of elastic deformation during the nanoscratch tests. Figure 1b evinces that the transition is affected by the contact pressure, the changing from purely elastic to elastoplastic contact upon doubling the ramped force of 4,000 μN. Figure 1c displays the surface of the GaN/a-axis sapphire that underwent sample pile-up on the surface areas during slip processing at a ramped load of 2,000 μN; it reveals that the surface material also exhibited an elastic reaction as a result of elastic deformation between the groove and film. Figure 1d, however, reveals that a transition from purely elastic to elastoplastic contact occurred only upon initially applying the ramped force of 4,000 μN; subsequently, it became a complete plastic contact. In the ductile-regime machining part (elastoplastic deformation) of the scratch track, we observed a slightly machined surface without cracks (Fig. 1d), because elastic–plastic deformation occurred. In the brittle transition part of the scratch track, we also observed several brittle regions. The brittle-regime machining part of the scratch track exhibited a deep profile. The bulge edge scenarios provided evidence for a significant reduction relative to the applied load at 2,000 μN in the average scratch depth on the GaN/c-axis sapphire (Fig. 1a, 1b). Furthermore, we observed nanoscratch deformation of the GaN/a-axis sapphire samples (Fig. 1c, 1d) in terms of the deep profiles of their nanoscratch traces, presumably because the GaN/a-axis sapphire sample featured weak bonds relative to those of the GaN/c-axis sapphire sample. The deep profile distribution of the a-axis GaN sample suggests that it was softer than its c-axis counterpart. Thus, the transition from purely elastic to elastoplastic contact was revealed in the nanoscratch traces and in the depth of the pile-up.
Figure 1

3D AFM images of scratch tracks formed in GaN films on sapphire substrates: a 2,000 μN ramped force, c-axis sapphire; b 4,000 μN, c-axis sapphire; c 2,000 μN, a-axis sapphire; d 4,000 μN, a-axis sapphire

Figure 2 presents typical profiles of the coefficient of friction (μ), obtained as the ratio of the in situ-measured tangential force to the applied ramped load, plotted with respect to the scratch duration at ramped loads of 2,000 and 4,000 μN. We found that the μ profiles of the GaN samples oscillated relatively regularly because of weak or strong bonds and cohesive failure from the period of transition of the GaN samples. Accordingly, the friction force revealed that a sliding mechanism was in operation, with the more strongly adhesive film providing a slighter fluctuation in its μ profile during the nanoscratch tests (Fig. 2a). Hence, the nanoscratch deformation of the GaN/a-axis sapphire sample resulted in μ profiles that featured rather irregular oscillation (Fig. 2b). Thus, lower adhesion reflects the presence of interlinks and rearrangements under a higher ramped load, not only involving the weaker GaN bonds but also resulting in higher values of the depth profile and the μ values (Table 1).
Figure 2

Typical profiles of the coefficient of friction (μ) plotted with respect to the scratch duration at ramped loads of 2,000 and 4,000 μN for GaN films on a c-axis and b a-axis sapphire substrates

Table 1

Critical lateral forces and values of μ determined from nanoscratch trace depths within GaN films on c- and a-axis sapphire substrates


Normal load (µN)

Coefficient of friction

Lateral force (µN)

GaN C-plane




GaN C-plane




GaN A-plane




GaN A-plane




The fluctuation profile from a nanoscratch tests does not depend exclusively on the plasticity or the value of H; it is also related to the adhesive strength between the film and the substrate. While the contact area between the tool and the GaN surface increases, the pressure under the tool becomes insufficient to drive the transformation to a denser crystal structure. Thus, the deformation theory cannot be accommodated in a ductile manner. From studies of nanomachining processing, both tribological and chemical effects, rather than physical deformation and fracture, are believed to become dominant. In this scenario, the average measured residual stress in the cracking zone is much lower than that in the crack-free zone, because the elastic strain is released by cracking. From the nanotribological point of view, curvature and/or distribution in the values of μ signal the onset of adhesive failure, such as cracking or delamination resulting from the interaction between the sliding stylus and the debris formed on the nanoscratch track [21, 22]. Several factors can affect the value of H of a film, including the packing factor, stoichiometry, residual stress, preferred orientation, and grain size. In our experiments, the orientation of the GaN sample not only affected its nanotribological performance but also its scratching resistance; thus, the volume of the removed material from nanoscratch tests can be measured to determine the role of the orientation of the GaN sample. This approach can be used to explain the nanotribological behavior of the GaN sample; for example, the profile of GaN/a-axis sapphire sample reveals more serious wear of the components (Fig. 1) and more unwanted self-excited oscillations (Fig. 2) than that of the GaN/c-axis sapphire sample. Thus, the GaN/c-axis sapphire sample revealed relatively small oscillations with respect to the ramped load. Taken together, our findings reveal that the nanoscratch deformation of the GaN samples was influenced primarily by the orientation of the sapphire substrate. The mechanisms for the dislocation recovery from elastic and/or plastic deformation appear to be associated with the activation of dislocation sources brought about by the nanoscratching of the GaN sample. The plastic deformation prior to nanoscratching was associated with the individual movement of a small number of new nucleation sites; large shear stress was quickly accumulated underneath the indenter tip. When the local stress underneath the tip reached high-level cycles, a burst of collective dislocation movement on the slip system was activated, resulting in a release of local stress. The extensive interactions between the dislocations slipping along the surface of the GaN/a-axis sapphire sample, therefore, confined the brittle transition part of the scratch track, resulting in ductile and/or brittle properties because of the deformed and strain-hardened lattice structure.


We employed a combination of nanoindentation and AFM techniques to investigate the contact-induced deformation behavior of GaN films on c- and a-axis sapphire substrates. We observed three separate scratch processes in the ductile, brittle transition (elastic–plastic deformation), and brittle regions. AFM morphological studies of the bulge edge scenarios provided evidence for significant reductions in the average scratch depth for the GaN/c-axis sapphire. It suggested that the substrate orientation dominated the extent of ploughing in the GaN epilayers during the scratching process. In addition, this discrepancy suggested that c-axis sapphire–grown GaN epilayers have higher shear resistance than those grown on a-axis sapphire. Pile-up events indicated the generation and motion of individual dislocations measured under the critical brittle transition part of the scratch track, result in ductile and/or brittle properties.



This research was supported by the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC-98-2221-E-009-069) and by the National Nano Device Laboratories in Taiwan (NDL97-C04SG-088, NDL97-C05SG-087).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chung Hsing University
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University


  1. Ponce FA, Bour DP: Nature. 1997, 386: 351. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXit1Wms7c%3D]; Bibcode number [1997Natur.386..351P] 10.1038/386351a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nakamura S, Mukai T, Senoh M: J. Appl. Phys.. 1994, 76: 8189. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXisFCru7s%3D]; Bibcode number [1994JAP....76.8189N] 10.1063/1.357872View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nagatomo T, Kuboyama T, Minamino H, Omoto O: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.. 1989, 28: L1334. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXmsVGit7o%3D]; Bibcode number [1989JaJAP..28L1334N] 10.1143/JJAP.28.L1334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yoshimoto N, Matsuoka T, Sasaki T, Katsui A: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1991, 59: 2251. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38XntFSrsw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1991ApPhL..59.2251Y] 10.1063/1.106086View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu L, Edgar JH: Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 2002, 37: 61. 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00008-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Pethica JB, Hutchings R, Oliver WC: Philos. Mag. A. 1983, 48: 593. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXpsVOitw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [1983PMagA..48..593P] 10.1080/01418618308234914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Oliver WC, Hutchings R, Pethica JB: ASTM STP 889. Edited by: Blau PJ, Lawn BR. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia; 1986.Google Scholar
  8. Doerner MF, Nix WD: J. Mater. Res.. 1986, 1: 601. Bibcode number [1986JMatR...1..601D] 10.1557/JMR.1986.0601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pethica JB: Ion Implantation into Metals. Edited by: Ashworth V, Grant W, Procter R. Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Loubet JL, Georges JM, Marchesini O, Meille G: J. Tribol. 1984, 106: 43. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXhtlSiurc%3D] 10.1115/1.3260865View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Newey D, Wilkens MA, Pollock HM: J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum.. 1982, 15: 119. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL38Xhs1Clsrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1982JPhE...15..119N] 10.1088/0022-3735/15/1/023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stone D, LaFontaine WR, Alexopoulos P, Wu T-W, Li C-Y: J. Mater. Res.. 1988, 3: 141. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXhslWqsrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1988JMatR...3..141S] 10.1557/JMR.1988.0141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kucheyev SO, Bradby JE, Williams JS, Jagadish C, Swain MV, Li G: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2001, 78: 156. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXit1Wjtw%3D%3D]; Bibcode number [2001ApPhL..78..156K] 10.1063/1.1335552View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kucheyev SO, Bradby JE, Williams JS, Jagadish C, Toth M, Phillips MR, Swain MV: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 2000, 77: 3373. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXotFGkur0%3D]; Bibcode number [2000ApPhL..77.3373K] 10.1063/1.1328047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nowak R, Pessa M, Suganuma M, Leszczynski M, Grzegory I, Porowski S, Yoshida F: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1999, 75: 2070. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmtFKlu7k%3D]; Bibcode number [1999ApPhL..75.2070N] 10.1063/1.124919View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei T, Hu Q, Duan R, Wang J, Zeng Y, Li J, Yang Y, Liu Y: Nanoscale Res. Lett.. 2009, 4: 753. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnt1SktLg%3D]; Bibcode number [2009NRL.....4..753W] 10.1007/s11671-009-9310-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sohn LL, Willet RL: Appl. Phys. Lett.. 1995, 67: 1552. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnvFOis7s%3D]; Bibcode number [1995ApPhL..67.1552S] 10.1063/1.114731View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ashida K, Morita N, Shosida Y: JSME Int. J., Ser. C. 2001, 44: 244. Bibcode number [2001JSMEC..44..244A] 10.1299/jsmec.44.244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Meredith W, Horsburgh G, Brownlie GD, Prior KA, Cavenett BC, Rothwell W, Dann AJ: J. Cryst. Growth. 1996, 159: 103. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK28XitVSqur0%3D]; Bibcode number [1996JCrGr.159..103M] 10.1016/0022-0248(95)00772-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jin C, Zhang B, Ling Z, Wang J, Hou X, Segawa Y, Wang X: J. Appl. Phys.. 1997, 81: 5148. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXivVKqtr8%3D]; Bibcode number [1997JAP....81.5148J] 10.1063/1.364958View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sánchez JM, El-Mansy S, Sun B, Scherban T, Fang N, Pantuso D, Ford W, Elizalde MR, Martínez-Esnaola JM, Martín-Meizoso A, Gil-Sevillano J, Fuentes M, Maiz J: Acta Mater.. 1999, 47: 4405. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00254-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Saha R, Nix WD: Acta Mater.. 2002, 50: 23. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXptFensLs%3D] 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2010