One-Pot Synthesis of Biocompatible CdSe/CdS Quantum Dots and Their Applications as Fluorescent Biological Labels
© Zhai et al. 2010
Received: 23 July 2010
Accepted: 23 August 2010
Published: 17 September 2010
We developed a novel one-pot polyol approach for the synthesis of biocompatible CdSe quantum dots (QDs) using poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) as a capping ligand at 240°C. The morphological and structural characterization confirmed the formation of biocompatible and monodisperse CdSe QDs with several nanometers in size. The encapsulation of CdS thin layers on the surface of CdSe QDs (CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs) was used for passivating the defect emission (650 nm) and enhancing the fluorescent quantum yields up to 30% of band-to-band emission (530–600 nm). Moreover, the PL emission peak of CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs could be tuned from 530 to 600 nm by the size of CdSe core. The as-prepared CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs with small size, well water solubility, good monodispersity, and bright PL emission showed high performance as fluorescent cell labels in vitro. The viability of QDs-labeled 293T cells was evaluated using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol)-2-diphenyltertrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The results showed the satisfactory (>80%) biocompatibility of as-synthesized PAA-capped QDs at the Cd concentration of 15 μg/ml.
KeywordsPolyol Synthesis CdSe/CdS Quantum dots Nanomaterials Luminescence Labeling
Fluorescent semiconductor nanocrystals, also known as one kind of quantum dots (QDs), are of considerable interest and under intensive research as biological labels either in vitro or in vivo, not only because of their bright, photostable fluorescence but also because of the broad excitation spectrum and narrow, size-controlled emission, which allows multi-color imaging [1, 2]. Among them, cadmium selenide (CdSe) QDs have become one family of the most extensively studied fluorescent semiconductor nanocrystals due to their suitable and tunable band gap throughout the visible spectrum . The high-temperature chemical reaction was a well-known approach for the synthesis of highly crystalline and monodisperse CdSe QDs with bright fluorescence using organometallic or chelated cadmium and phosphine-coordinated selenium as precursors [4–6]. However, besides the use of expensive, toxic chemicals, the as-received QDs were usually hydrophobic and must be converted into water-soluble nanocrystals through surface ligand exchanges  or encapsulations of polymers  and thin silica layers  for biological applications. The possible weight loss and decrease in quantum yields are always unavoidable during the conversion .
Synthesis directly in water-soluble solvent has been considered to be an alternative approach for circumventing the above-mentioned disadvantages. Recently, great efforts have been employed to focus on the synthesis of hydrophilic CdSe QDs directly in water or inverse micelles [10, 11]. However, the crystal quality and quantum yields of the as-synthesized QDs were often limited, mainly due to the low reaction temperature . The polyol method provided a promising high-temperature hydrophilic system for one-pot synthesis of biocompatible QDs, which combined the advantages of the two above-mentioned methods . In last two decades, it has been widely applied to fabricate water-soluble particles of various materials with sub-micrometer size including metals , alloys , metal oxides , and metal sulfides . However, obtaining biocompatible QDs with a very small size, high crystal quality, and quantum yields by polyol approach still remains a tremendous challenge .
Herein, we have developed a novel one-pot polyol approach for the synthesis of water-soluble CdSe and CdSe/CdS type-I core–shell QDs with several nanometers in size. The one-pot method can provide high-quality biocompatible quantum dots without using expensive phosphines and complicated surface modification, which takes the advantages of simpleness, low cost, and green precursor. Moreover, the as-received QDs show the tunable and bright PL emission with high quantum yields and high performance as fluorescent biological labels in vitro.
Synthesis of CdSe QDs
In a typical synthesis, 1 g poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, MW = 1,800) and 0.5 mmol cadmium acetate (Cd(AC)2) were subsequently dissolved into 20 ml triethylene glycol (TREG), which were then heated to 200°C under Ar flow. After 30 min, the solution was cooled to room temperature, and 19 mg of Se powder was added. Finally, the mixture was heated to 240°C and kept for a certain period of time such as 1, 5, 60, and 120 min.
Synthesis of CdSe/CdS QDs
As sulfur source, 19 mg thiourea was added into the above-mentioned CdSe precursor solution. The redundant Cd(AC)2 in the CdSe precursor solution was used as cadmium source. Subsequently, the mixture was heated to 160°C in 1 h. After the reaction for 2 h, the solution was quickly cooled to room temperature and precipitated by ethyl acetate. The resultant solid products were further purified by dialysis and ultrafiltration for cell imaging.
In Vitro Cell Viability and Cell Imaging
Human embryonal kidney cell line 293T cells (ATCC CRL-11268, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in a high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (H-DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C under 5% CO2 condition. The cells were subcultured every 3 days. Viability of QDs-labeled 293T cells was evaluated using an MTT assay (SIGMA, St. Louis, MO). Cells were seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates at a density of 8 × 104 cells/well. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with 200 μL of the as-synthesized QDs containing different concentrations of nanoparticles. After 24-h labeling and washing, 20 μL of a solution of MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well, and assay was performed at specific time intervals. The absorbance of the formazen product was then measured at a wavelength of 570 nm. Four groups of MTT tests were done for each quantum dots concentration. The values of MTT assay of labeled cells were expressed as the percentage of corresponding control cells. For cell imaging, 293T cells (2 × 104 cells/24-well plates) were grown on coverslips for 24 h and then incubated with PAA-capped CdSe/CdS QDs (Cd concentration of 5 μg/mL, measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer), at 5% CO2 at 37°C for 4 h. The cells were washed thrice with PBS and analyzed with confocal microscopy afterward.
The products were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku D/max-ga X-ray diffractometer with graphite monochromatized CuKa radiation (λ = 1.54178Å). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was applied to determine the morphology and structure. The photoluminescence (PL) examination was performed on a detector PMT and ACTON SpectraPro 2500i using a He–Cd laser with a 325-nm wavelength as the excitation source. The confocal fluorescence images were obtained with a laser scanning confocal microscope (LEICA TCS SP2).
Results and Discussion
In the PL spectra of the CdSe QDs, there is a broad emission band originating from the surface trap sites besides the band-to-band emission, especially in the samples with smaller size, which decreases not only the monochromaticity of the fluorescence but also the quantum yields of the QDs. In our case, the quantum yields of the as-synthesized CdSe cores are around 2–3%. In order to passivate their surface trap sites and enhance the quantum yields, a consequent polyol approach was developed to fabricate type-I CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs by subsequently growing a thin CdS layer on the surface of the CdSe QDs using thiourea as sulfur source at 160°C. The XRD and EDX analysis were used to reveal the formation of CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs (Figure 2). In comparison with the XRD pattern of the CdSe QDs, the three characteristic diffraction peaks of the CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs (Figure 2a) only shift to larger angles and locate between those of the CdSe and CdS cubic phase, which demonstrate the formation of the CdS shell on the surface of the CdSe QDs . The formation of the CdS shell is further supported by the EDX analysis (Figure 2b). The strong peaks for S, Se, and Cd elements in the spectrum confirm the formation of the CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs.
In summary, we have developed a novel, cost-effective, and environment friendly polyol approach for the one-pot synthesis of biocompatible CdSe and CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs with several nanometers in size, good biocompatibility, good monodispersity, strong, and tunable fluorescent emission. The as-synthesized PAA-capped CdSe/CdS core–shell QDs exhibited high performance as fluorescent cell labels in vitro and thus promising applications.
The authors would like to appreciate the financial supports from 973 Project (No. 2007CB613403), NSFC (No. 50802086, 30672072), ZiJin Project, ZJPNSFC (Y407138), the Doctoral Program of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 20070335014), Zhejiang Innovation Program for Graduates (2008022), and the foundation of 2008DFR50250.
- Chan WCW, Nie S: Science. 1998, 281: 2016. 10.1126/science.281.5385.2016View Article
- Alivisatos AP: Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 47. 10.1038/nbt927View Article
- Alivisatos AP: Science. 1996, 271: 933. 10.1126/science.271.5251.933View Article
- Murray CB, Noms DJ, Bawendi MG: J Am Chem Soc. 1993, 115: 8706. 10.1021/ja00072a025View Article
- Peng X, Wickham J, Alivisatos AP: J Am Chem Soc. 1998, 120: 5343. 10.1021/ja9805425View Article
- Peng ZA, Peng X: J Am Chem Soc. 2001, 123: 183. 10.1021/ja003633mView Article
- Wang Q, Xu Y, Zhao X, Chang Y, Liu Y, Jiang L, Sharma J, Seo D, Yan H: J Am Chem Soc. 2007, 129: 6380. 10.1021/ja071434yView Article
- Zhang T, Ge J, Hu Y, Yin Y: Nano Lett. 2007, 7: 3203. 10.1021/nl071928tView Article
- Yong K, Roy I, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Tramposch KM, Swihart MT, Prasad PN: Adv Mater. 2008, 20: 1. 10.1002/adma.200702462View Article
- Weller H: Adv Mater. 1993, 5: 88. 10.1002/adma.19930050204View Article
- Rogach AL, Kornowski A, Eychmüller A, Weller H: J Phys Chem B. 1998, 102: 8360. 10.1021/jp9823603View Article
- Feldmann C: Solid State Sci. 2005, 7: 868. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.01.018View Article
- Sun Y, Xia Y: Adv Mater. 2002, 14: 833. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020605)14:11<833::AID-ADMA833>3.0.CO;2-KView Article
- Roychowdhury C, Matsumoto F, Mutolo PF, Abruna HD, DiSalvo FJ: Chem Mater. 2005, 17: 5871. 10.1021/cm051886eView Article
- Orel ZC, Anzlovar A, Drazic G, Zigon M: Cryst Growth Des. 2007, 7: 453. 10.1021/cg060615tView Article
- Feldmann C, Jungk H: Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001, 40: 359. 10.1002/1521-3773(20010119)40:2<359::AID-ANIE359>3.0.CO;2-BView Article
- Yang AY, Wu H, Williams RK, Cao CY: Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005, 44: 6712. 10.1002/anie.200502279View Article
- Talapin DV, Rogach AL, Kornowski A, Haase M, Weller H: Nano Lett. 2007, 1: 207. 10.1021/nl0155126View Article
- Peng X, Schlamp MC, Kadavanich AV, Alivisatos AP: J Am Chem Soc. 1997, 119: 7019. 10.1021/ja970754mView Article
- Pradhan N, Peng X: J Am Chem Soc. 2007, 129: 3339. 10.1021/ja068360vView Article
- Lovri J, Cho SJ, Winnik FM, Maysinger D: Chem Biol. 2005, 12: 1227. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.09.008View Article
- Li KG, Chen JT, Bai SS, Wen X, Song SY, Yu Q, Li J, Wang YQ: Toxicol In Vitro. 2009, 23: 1007. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.020View Article
- Dif A, Boulmedais F, Pinot M, Roullier V, Baudy-Floch M, Coquelle FM, Clarke S, Neveu P, Vignaux F, Borgne RL, Dahan M, Gueroui Z, Marchi-Artzner V: J Am Chem Soc. 2009, 131: 14738. 10.1021/ja902743uView Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.