A Novel Way for Synthesizing Phosphorus-Doped Zno Nanowires
© Gao et al. 2010
Received: 22 July 2010
Accepted: 14 September 2010
Published: 28 September 2010
We developed a novel approach to synthesize phosphorus (P)-doped ZnO nanowires by directly decomposing zinc phosphate powder. The samples were demonstrated to be P-doped ZnO nanowires by using scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction spectra, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy dispersive spectrum, Raman spectra and photoluminescence measurements. The chemical state of P was investigated by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analyses in individual ZnO nanowires. P was found to substitute at oxygen sites (PO), with the presence of anti-site P on Zn sites (PZn). P-doped ZnO nanowires were high resistance and the related P-doping mechanism was discussed by combining EELS results with electrical measurements, structure characterization and photoluminescence measurements. Our method provides an efficient way of synthesizing P-doped ZnO nanowires and the results help to understand the P-doping mechanism.
KeywordsZnO Nanowires P-doped Zinc phosphate
As a kind of very potential candidate material for future short-wavelength optoelectronic devices, zinc oxide (ZnO) has stimulated intensive research interest in the past decades . However, commercialization of ZnO remains in doubt due to great difficulties in achieving stable p-type-doped ZnO because of low doping efficiency  and instability of dopant in ZnO . Phosphorus (P) has been proved to be one of the best dopant for p-type doping in ZnO; however, the doping mechanism remains controversial . P has at least two stable configurations: complex (PZn + 2VZn) formed by combination between antisite substitutional P (PZn) and two zinc vacancies (VZn); substitutional P at oxygen sites (PO) . PZn + 2VZn were believed to be the effective configuration for p-type doping, which induces a shallow acceptor level in the band gap, while PO was suggested to induce relatively deep acceptor level, not resulting in sufficient hole concentration in ZnO. Most of the p-type conductivity observed in P-doped ZnO is attributed to PZn + 2VZn until now [5, 6] and high resistance of P-doped ZnO is always believed to be induced by PO . However, experimental evidence for such assignment is rarely reported.
As building blocks for next generation nano-optoelectronic devices, p-type ZnO nanowires have attracted considerable attention recently [8, 9]. P-doped p-type ZnO nanowires have been obtained by simple chemical vapor deposition method , direct carbothermal method , pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) , thermal evaporation , diffusion method  and hydrothermal method . However, in all above reports, the configuration of incorporated P was not determined, leaving the doping mechanism unclear. Meanwhile, carbon (C), which was introduced more or less in most of the methods reported above, was demonstrated to be a big obstacle to realize p-type ZnO by forming n-type domains such as graphite clusters along the grain boundaries . Thus, a kind of C-free method is highly needed to be more effective in p-type doping of ZnO.
In this work, a novel C-free approach was developed to synthesize P-doped ZnO nanowires. The configuration of incorporated P in ZnO was achieved from individual ZnO nanowires by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analyses. Possible P-doping mechanism was investigated by combining EELS results with electrical measurements.
ZnO nanowires were synthesized by directly decomposing zinc phosphate powder. Pure zinc phosphate powder (99%) was loaded in an alumina boat. The purity of zinc phosphate is rather low; however, as pointed out by the manufacturer, the main impurities in zinc phosphate are other compounds composed of phosphorus and zinc such as zinc pyrophosphate, as well as some lead, iron and other heavy metals. In addition, we checked the purity of zinc phosphate by EDS measurements, and no other elements can be detected except oxygen, zinc and phosphorus. We also checked the purity of the nanowires after growth by XPS, EDS and EELS measurements and we did not find other elements. As a result, we think that the impurity in the source does not affect the properties of nanowires severely. A piece of (001) sapphire slice was placed above the zinc phosphate powder as the collecting substrate. Then, the boat was placed at the center of a quartz tube and inserted into a rapid heating furnace. Argon was used to clean the furnace for 10 min and then set to 200 sccm as carrier gas during growth. The furnace was heated up to 1,050°C in 20 min and held for 1 min and then cooled down to room temperature naturally. Oxygen (2.6 sccm) was added as the reactive gas when the furnace temperature reached 1,050°C. After growth, the substrate was covered by a layer of wax-like product.
The samples were characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Quanta 200FEG), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) (Tecnai F30) and energy dispersive spectrum (EDS). Raman spectra excited by a 514 nm laser (Renishaw inVia Raman Microscope Raman system) and photoluminescence (PL) using a He–Cd laser with a wavelength of 325 nm were measured. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (AXIS-Ultra instrument, Kratos Analytical) analysis was carried out to investigate the chemical states of phosphorus in ZnO. EELS analyses were performed to determine the configuration of incorporated P in ZnO lattice.
Results and Discussion
Low-magnification TEM image of a typical P-doped nanowire is shown in Figure 1d. The P-doped nanowires have a uniform diameter about 100 nm from bottom to top and a smooth surface with no cluster attached on it. High-resolution TEM image (Figure 1e) shows that the as-grown P-doped ZnO nanowires are single crystal without amorphous layer on the surface. The lattice spacing along the growth direction is 0.52 nm, corresponding to the planar spacing between two (001) planes of ZnO, which indicates that the as-grown samples are ZnO nanowires rather than Zn3P2 or other phases. As shown in the electron diffraction pattern in the inset of Figure 1e, the P-doped ZnO nanowires grow along  axis. No second phase or cluster could be detected in the electron diffraction pattern. Zn and O peaks dominate the EDS spectrum from a single P-doped ZnO nanowire (Figure 1f) with P signal, indicating the existence of P in individual nanowires. The peak of C and Cu comes from copper grid and Fe and Co and Ni are from Tecnai F30. By analyzing the EDS spectrum, the content of phosphorus in the nanowire was quantified as P: Zn = 1.4% (Atomic Ratio), corresponding to the P concentration of ~1020 cm-3.
In Figure 2b, the PL spectrum of P-doped ZnO nanowires at room temperature has only one peak centered at 380 nm, which is the near band edge (NBE) emission due to recombination of free excitons (FX). No defect-related emission is observed, especially the commonly observed peak at 520 nm caused by oxygen vacancy and the peak around 480 nm caused by zinc vacancy . Magnified spectrum from 475~625 nm part (inset of Figure 2b) demonstrates that the defect-related emission disappears. The absence of such defect-related emission suggests the good quality of the as-synthesized P-doped ZnO nanowires.
Hereto, successful synthesis of P-doped ZnO nanowires by decomposing zinc phosphate powder was demonstrated. Next, we investigated the configuration and chemical state of incorporated P in the as-grown P-doped ZnO nanowires by EELS analyses, which can give information of chemical valence and neighboring environment. Atomic configurations of PO and PZn + 2VZn in ZnO are shown in Figure 2c. P L23 peak appears in the EELS spectra (Tecnai F30 together with a Gatan imaging filter) of P-doped ZnO nanowires (Figure 2d), which is a evidence for the incorporation of P in ZnO nanowires. P L23 peak in Zn3P2, P2O5 and Zn3(PO4)2 was also measured for comparison and shown in Figure 2d as well, where P adopts chemical valence -3, +5 and +5, respectively. For reference samples, Zn3P2 nanowires, P2O5 powder and Zn3 (PO4)2 powder were used, respectively. From Figure 2d, it can be seen that the P L23 peak from P2O5 is almost the same as those from Zn3(PO4)2, because of the same chemical valence of P. The peak around 136 eV is demonstrated to be associated with +5 state of P . In Figure 2d, the one mostly similar to the P L23 peak in P-doped ZnO nanowires is those from Zn3P2, with a little difference on the intensity of the peak around 129 eV. The peak at 129 eV is attributable to the -3 state of P . The appearance of the peak at 129 eV and the agreement between the P L23 peak from P-doped ZnO nanowires and Zn3P2 demonstrate that a part of P in P-doped ZnO nanowires adopts chemical valences of -3 as in Zn3P2 , corresponding to substitutional P at an O site, forming Zn–P bonds with surrounding Zn atoms. The intensity difference between P L23 peaks from P-doped ZnO nanowires and Zn3P2 results from the difference between the fine configurations of P in these two cases. In addition, the peak at 136 eV related to +5 state of P also appeared in EELS spectrum of P L23 peak from P-doped ZnO nanowires, indicating the presence of antisite P with chemical valence of +5. The role of PO and PZn will be discussed after the electrical measurements section.
EELS has been wildly used to investigate the chemical environment of magnetic dopant in ZnO [20, 21], while there is no report of EELS analyses on p-type dopant mainly due to low doping concentration. As an alternative, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was always used to characterize the chemical state of dopant. However, as we know, XPS reflects the mixed information from the entire substrate, which cannot be corresponded to state of dopant in individual nanowire. Compared to XPS, EELS analyses on individual nanowire provide unambiguous information about the chemical state of dopant in single nanowire and are effective to understand the doping mechanism related to such state.
Combining electrical measurements with EELS results and structure characterization, the doping mechanism of P is discussed as follows. From Raman and PL characterization, P-doped ZnO nanowires are of high quality. The possibility of imperfect lattice inducing high resistance of P-doped ZnO nanowires can be excluded. The native defects in P-doped ZnO nanowires are limited, thus the compensation effects from native defects are suppressed. Thus, P did not generated sufficient hole in as-grown P-doped ZnO nanowires though it mainly substitutes at oxygen sites from EELS analyses, which mostly because it induces a deep acceptor level in the ZnO band and may not provide effective conductive hole to contribute to p-type doping. In addition, due to the lack of zinc vacancy, the PZn cannot form effective P-doping configuration of PZn + 2VZn and does also not generate sufficient hole.
To confirm the effects of P-doping on electronic structure of ZnO, the PL measurements at 10 K were performed. The PL spectrum of P-doped ZnO nanowires at 10 K is shown in Figure 3c with the enlarged detail for the peaks around 3.310 eV shown in inset. The PL spectrum of pure ZnO nanowires at 10 K is also shown for reference. The free-exciton (FX) peak locates at 3.377 eV with its first longitudinal-optical (LO) phonon replicas at 3.310 eV, consistent with other reports . The difference between FX and FX-1LO is only 67 meV, smaller than the LO-phonon energy of ZnO, due to energy softening of 1LO-phonon . The neutral–donor-bound exciton (D0X) centered at 3.361 eV dominates the near band edge emission (NBE) of P-doped ZnO nanowires with D0X-1LO at 3.290 eV. Neutral-acceptor-bound peaks around 3.35 eV, which were always found in P-doped ZnO [26, 27], were not observed here. The peak at 3.321 eV is always observed in P-doped ZnO films and attributed to free electron to acceptor (FA) transitions [26, 27]. To investigate the origin of 3.321 eV peak, the temperature-dependent PL measurements were performed. In Figure 3d, as the temperature rising from 10 to 50 K, the peak at 3.321 eV decreased rapidly and disappeared at 40 K with only FX-1LO peak left. It was reported that FA emission is often accompanied with DAP (donor–acceptor pair) emission in ZnO at low temperature . The DAP emission can transform into FA with increasing temperature due to the smaller donor binding energy than acceptor energy. Thus, FA intensity was relatively enhanced compared to D0X and TES as increasing temperature, though the absolute intensity of whole spectrum decreased. The FA peak will remain in PL spectrum until the acceptors are thermally ionized at temperatures above 200 K. Here, the peak at 3.321 eV decreased rapidly as the increasing temperature and disappeared at 40 K, which was not the characteristic of FA. As a result, the peak at 3.321 eV could not be assigned to FA. In addition, the peak at 3.321 eV also appeared in PL of pure ZnO nanowires as shown in Figure 3c, which could be assigned to two-electron satellite (TES) emission, which often appeared in low-temperature PL of ZnO and disappeared at the temperature around 50 K . The absence of P-related peak in PL of P-doped ZnO nanowires may confirm our discussion about P-doping mechanism in above section: PO induces a deep acceptor level in the ZnO band and may not provide effective conductive hole to contribute to p-type doping. PZn cannot form effective P-doping configuration of PZn + 2VZn due to the lack of zinc vacancy. To realize p-type doping in P-doped ZnO, appropriate growth conditions must be adopted to form PZn + 2VZn, which is the effective configuration of P for the p-type doping. Our results confirm the theoretical results related to P-doping mechanism in ZnO .
As we introduced, we developed a kind of C-free method to synthesize P-doped ZnO nanowires. The detailed characterization on the effect of C was not performed because C presented in most of characterization method. C is usually used as the standard reference in XPS measurement and a thin C layer covers on the copper grid used in EELS analyses performed in TEM. However, we believe that the absence of C in the growth process would be very effective to avoid the possible effect induced by C . Such kind of C-free method can be applied to synthesize other materials nanowires by decomposing-related compound.
In summary, P-doped ZnO nanowires were successfully synthesized by a C-free method via directly decomposing zinc phosphate powder. As-grown samples were single-crystalline ZnO nanowires grown along  direction. Phosphorus incorporated into individual ZnO nanowires, which were directly confirmed by EELS analyses. EELS analyses demonstrated that P incorporated substitutionally at O sites in the as-grown P-doped ZnO nanowires with the presence of PZn. As-grown P-doped ZnO nanowires showed high resistance, which because that PO induced a deep acceptor level in the band gap and PZn cannot form effective P-doping configuration of PZn + 2VZn due to the lack of zinc vacancy. Our method provides a novel approach to synthesize P-doped nanowires, and the investigation results help to understand the p-type-doping mechanism of ZnO nanowires.
This project is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 50902004, 90606023, 10974003), National 973 projects (No. 2007CB936202, 2009CB623703, MOST) from China's Ministry of Science and Technology and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education.
- Tang ZK, Wong GKL, Yu P, Kawasaki M, Ohtomo A, Koinuma H, Segawa Y: Appl Phys Lett. 1998, 72: 3270. 10.1063/1.121620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park CH, Zhang SB, Wei SH: Phys Rev B. 2002, 66: 073202. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.073202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiang B, Wang PW, Zhang XZ, Dayeh SA, Aplin DPR, Soci C, Yu DP, Wang DL: Nano Lett. 2007, 7: 323. 10.1021/nl062410cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee WJ, Kang J, Chang KJ: Phys Rev B. 2006, 73: 024117. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.024117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim HS, Pearton SJ, Nortona DP: J Appl Phys. 2007, 102: 104904. 10.1063/1.2815676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu MP, Song JH, Lu MY, Chen MT, Gao YF, Chen LJ, Wang ZL: Nano Lett. 2009, 9: 1223. 10.1021/nl900115yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heo YW, Park SJ, Ip K, Pearton SJ, Norton DP: Appl Phys Lett. 2003, 83: 1128. 10.1063/1.1594835View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Xiu FX, Sun K, Xie YH, Wang KL, Wang Y, Zou J, Yang Z, Liu JL: J Am Chem Soc. 2010, 132: 2498. 10.1021/ja908521sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuan GD, Zhang WJ, Jie JS, Fan X, Zapien JA, Leung YH, Luo LB, Wang PF, Lee CS, Lee ST: Nano Lett. 2008, 8: 2591. 10.1021/nl073022tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li PJ, Liao ZM, Zhang XZ, Zhang XJ, Zhu HC, Gao JY, Laurent K, Wang YL, Wang N, Yu DP: Nano Lett. 2009, 9: 2513. 10.1021/nl803443xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao BQ, Lorenz M, Brandt M, Wenckstern HV, Lenzner J, Biehne G, Grundmann M: Phys Status Solidi RRL. 2008, 2: 37. 10.1002/pssr.200701268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin SS, Hong JI, Song JH, Zhu Y, He HP, Xu Z, Wei YG, Ding Y, Snyder RL, Wang ZL: Nano Lett. 2009, 9: 3877. 10.1021/nl902067aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shan CX, Liu Z, Hark SK: Appl Phys Lett. 2008, 92: 073103. 10.1063/1.2884312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JY, Li PJ, Sun H, Shen X, Deng TS, Zhu KT, Zhang QF, Wu JL: Appl Phys Lett. 2008, 93: 021116. 10.1063/1.2958230View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fang X, Li JH, Zhao DX, Shen DZ, Li BH, Wang XH: J Phys Chem C. 2009, 113: 21208. 10.1021/jp906175xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang K, Gu SL, Zhu SM, Liu W, Ye JD, Zhu JM, Zhang R, Zheng YD, Sun XW: Appl Phys Lett. 2008, 93: 132107. 10.1063/1.2992197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sieber B, Liu H, Piret G, Laureyns J, Roussel P, Gelloz B, Szunerits S, Boukherroub R: J Phys Chem C. 2009, 113: 13643. 10.1021/jp903504wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Djurisic AB, Leung YH, Tam KH, Hsu YF, Ding L, Ge WK, Zhong YC, Wong KS, Chan WK, Tam HL, Cheah KW, Kwok WM, Phillips DL: Nanotechnology. 2007, 18: 095702. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/9/095702View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaithianathan V, Asokan K, Park JY, Kim SS: Appl Phys A. 2009, 94: 995. 10.1007/s00339-008-4883-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JJ, Yu MH, Zhou WL, Sun K, Wang LM: Appl Phys Lett. 2005, 87: 173119. 10.1063/1.2119415View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JM, Yu C, Liao ZM, Zhang XZ, You LP, Yu DP: J Electron Microsc. 2009, 58: 295. 10.1093/jmicro/dfp026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lao CS, Liu J, Gao PX, Zhang LY, Davidovic D, Tummala R, Wang ZL: Nano Lett. 2006, 6: 263. 10.1021/nl052239pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jie JS, Zhang WJ, Peng KQ, Yuan GD, Lee CS, Lee ST: Adv Funct Mater. 2008, 18: 3251. 10.1002/adfm.200800399View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun JW, Lu YM, Liu YC, Shen DZ, Zhang ZZ, Yao B, Li BH, Zhang JY, Zhao DX, Fan XW: J Appl Phys. 2007, 102: 043522. 10.1063/1.2772581View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hsu HC, Hsieh WF: Solid State Commun. 2004, 131: 371. 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.05.043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang DK, Oh MS, Lim JH, Kang CG, Park SJ: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 90: 021106. 10.1063/1.2430937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang DK, Kim HS, Lim JH, Oh JY, Yang JH, Park SJ: Appl Phys Lett. 2005, 86: 151917. 10.1063/1.1895480View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao BQ, Lorenz M, Rahm A, Wenckstern HV, Zekalla CC, Lenzner J, Benndorf G, Grundmann M: Nanotechnology. 2007, 18: 455707. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/45/455707View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.