# Nanofluid bioconvection in water-based suspensions containing nanoparticles and oxytactic microorganisms: oscillatory instability

- Andrey V Kuznetsov
^{1}Email author

**6**:100

**DOI: **10.1186/1556-276X-6-100

© Kuznetsov; licensee Springer. 2011

**Received: **20 September 2010

**Accepted: **25 January 2011

**Published: **25 January 2011

## Abstract

The aim of this article is to propose a novel type of a nanofluid that contains both nanoparticles and motile (oxytactic) microorganisms. The benefits of adding motile microorganisms to the suspension include enhanced mass transfer, microscale mixing, and anticipated improved stability of the nanofluid. In order to understand the behavior of such a suspension at the fundamental level, this article investigates its stability when it occupies a shallow horizontal layer. The oscillatory mode of nanofluid bioconvection may be induced by the interaction of three competing agencies: oxytactic microorganisms, heating or cooling from the bottom, and top or bottom-heavy nanoparticle distribution. The model includes equations expressing conservation of total mass, momentum, thermal energy, nanoparticles, microorganisms, and oxygen. Physical mechanisms responsible for the slip velocity between the nanoparticles and the base fluid, such as Brownian motion and thermophoresis, are accounted for in the model. An approximate analytical solution of the eigenvalue problem is obtained using the Galerkin method. The obtained solution provides important physical insights into the behavior of this system; it also explains when the oscillatory mode of instability is possible in such system.

## Introduction

The term "nanofluid" was coined by Choi in his seminal paper presented in 1995 at the ASME Winter Annual Meeting [1]. It refers to a liquid containing a dispersion of submicronic solid particles (nanoparticles) with typical length on the order of 1-50 nm [2]. The unique properties of nanofluids include the impressive enhancement of thermal conductivity as well as overall heat transfer [3–7]. Various mechanisms leading to heat transfer enhancement in nanofluids are discussed in numerous publications; see, for example [8–12].

Wang [13–15] pioneered in developing the constructal approach, created by Bejan [16–19], for designing nanofluids. Nanofluids enhance the thermal performance of the base fluid; the utilization of the constructal theory makes it possible to design a nanofluid with the best microstructure and performance within a specified type of microstructures.

Recent publications show significant interest in applications of nanofluids in various types of microsystems. These include microchannels [20], microheat pipes [21], microchannel heat sinks [22], and microreactors [23]. There is also significant potential in using nanomaterials in different bio-microsystems, such as enzyme biosensors [24]. In [25], the performance of a bioseparation system for capturing nanoparticles was simulated. There is also strong interest in developing chip-size microdevices for evaluating nanoparticle toxicity; Huh et al. [26] suggested a biomimetic microsystem that reconstitutes the critical functional alveolar-capillary interface of the human lung to evaluate toxic and inflammatory responses of the lung to silica nanoparticles.

The aim of this article is to propose a novel type of a nanofluid that contains both nanoparticles and oxytactic microorganisms, such as a soil bacterium *Bacillus subtilis*. These particular microorganisms are oxygen consumers that swim up the oxygen concentration gradient. There are important similarities and differences between nanoparticles and motile microorganisms. In their impressive review of nanofluids research, Wang and Fan [27] pointed out that nanofluids involve four scales: the molecular scale, the microscale, the macroscale, and the megascale. There is interaction between these scales. For example, by manipulating the structure and distribution of nanoparticles the researcher can impact macroscopic properties of the nanofluid, such as its thermal conductivity. Similar to nanofluids, in suspensions of motile microorganisms that exhibit spontaneous formation of flow patterns (this phenomenon is called bioconvection) physical laws that govern smaller scales lead to a phenomenon visible on a larger scale. While superfluidity and superconductivity are quantum phenomena visible at the macroscale, bioconvection is a mesoscale phenomenon, in which the motion of motile microorganisms induces a macroscopic motion (convection) in the fluid. This happens because motile microorganisms are heavier than water and they generally swim in the upward direction, causing an unstable top-heavy density stratification which under certain conditions leads to the development of hydrodynamic instability. Unlike motile microorganisms, nanoparticles are not self-propelled; they just move due to such phenomena as Brownian motion and thermophoresis and are carried by the flow of the base fluid. On the contrary, motile microorganisms can actively swim in the fluid in response to such stimuli as gravity, light, or chemical attraction. Combining nanoparticles and motile microorganisms in a suspension makes it possible to use benefits of both of these microsystems.

One possible application of bioconvection in bio-microsystems is for mass transport enhancement and mixing, which are important issues in many microsystems [28, 29]. Also, the results presented in [30] suggest using bioconvection in a toxic compound sensor due to the ability of some toxic compounds to inhibit the flagella movement and thus suppress bioconvection. Also, preventing nanoparticles from agglomerating and aggregating remains a significant challenge. One of the reasons why this is challenging is because although inducing mixing at the macroscale is easy and can be achieved by stirring, inducing and controlling mixing at the microscale is difficult. Bioconvection can provide both types of mixing. Macroscale mixing is provided by inducing the unstable density stratification due to microorganisms' upswimming. Mixing at the microscale is provided by flagella (or flagella bundle) motion of individual microorganisms. Due to flagella rotation, microorganisms push fluid along their axis of symmetry, and suck it from the sides [31]. While the estimates given in [32] show that the stresslet stress produced by individual microorganisms have negligible effect on macroscopic motion of the fluid (which is rather driven by the buoyancy force induced by the top-heavy density stratification due to microorganisms' upswimming), the effect produced by flagella rotation is not negligible on the microscopic scale (on the scale of a microorganism and a nanoparticle).

In order to use suspensions containing both nanoparticles and motile microorganisms in microsystems, the behavior of such suspensions must be understood at the fundamental level. Bio-thermal convection caused by the combined effect of upswimming of oxytacic microorganisms and temperature variation was investigated in [33–36]. Bioconvection in nanofluids is expected to occur if the concentration of nanoparticles is small, so that nanoparticles do not cause any significant increase of the viscosity of the base fluid. The problem of bioconvection in suspensions containing small solid particles (nanoparticles) was first studied in [37–41] and then recently in [42]. Non-oscillatory bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic microorganisms was considered in Kuznetsov AV: **Nanofluid bioconvection: Interaction of microorganisms oxytactic upswimming, nanoparticle distribution and heating/cooling from below**. *Theor Comput Fluid Dyn* 2010, submitted. This article extends the theory to the case of oscillatory convection in suspensions containing both nanoparticles and oxytactic microorganisms.

### Governing equations

The governing equations are formulated for a water-based nanofluid containing nanoparticles and oxytactic microorganisms. The nanofluid occupies a horizontal layer of depth *H*. It is assumed that the nanoparticle suspension is stable. According to Choi [2], there are methods (including suspending nanoparticles using either surfactant or surface charge technology) that lead to stable nanofluids. It is further assumed that the presence of nanoparticles has no effect on the direction of microorganisms' swimming and on their swimming velocity. This is a reasonable assumption if the nanoparticle suspension is dilute; the concentration of nanoparticles has to be small anyway for the bioconvection-induced flow to occur (otherwise, a large concentration of nanoparticles would result in a large suspension viscosity which would suppress bioconvection).

In formulating the governing equations, the terms pertaining to nanoparticles are written using the theory developed in Buongiorno [43], while the terms pertaining to oxytactic microorganisms are written using the approach developed by Hillesdon and Pedley [44, 45].

where U = (*u,v,w*) is the dimensionless nanofluid velocity, defined as U**H*/*α*_{f}; U* is the dimensional nanofluid velocity; *α*_{f} is the thermal diffusivity of a nanofluid, *k*/(*ρc*)_{f}; *k* is the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid; and (*ρc*)_{f} is the volumetric heat capacity of the nanofluid. The dimensionless coordinates are defined as (*x,y,z*) = (*x*, y*, z**)/*H*, where *z* is the vertically downward coordinate.

where $\widehat{k}$ is the vertically downward unit vector.

where *t* is the dimensionless time, *p* is the dimensionless pressure, *ϕ* is the relative nanoparticle volume fraction, *T* is the dimensionless temperature, *n* is the dimensionless concentration of microorganisms, *t** is the time, *p*^{
*
}is the pressure, *μ* is the viscosity of the suspension (containing the base fluid, nanoparticles and microorganisms), *ϕ*^{
*
}is the nanoparticle volume fraction, ${\varphi}_{0}^{\ast}$ is the nanoparticle volume fraction at the lower wall, ${\varphi}_{1}^{\ast}$ is the nanoparticle volume fraction at the upper wall, *T** is the nanofluid temperature, ${T}_{c}^{\ast}$ is the temperature at the upper wall (also used as a reference temperature), ${T}_{h}^{\ast}$ is the temperature at the lower wall, *n** is the concentration of microorganisms, and ${n}_{0}^{\ast}$ is the average concentration of microorganisms (concentration of microorganisms in a well-stirred suspension).

*Pr*; the basic-density Rayleigh number,

*Rm*; the traditional thermal Rayleigh number,

*Ra*; the nanoparticle concentration Rayleigh number,

*Rn*; the bioconvection Rayleigh number,

*Rb*; and the bioconvection Lewis number,

*Lb*, are defined as follows:

where *ρ*_{
f0
}is the base-fluid density at the reference temperature; *ρ*_{
p
}is the nanoparticle mass density; *g* is the gravity; *β* is the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient of the base fluid; Δ*ρ* is the density difference between microorganisms and a base fluid, *ρ*_{mo}*- ρ*_{f0}; *ρ*_{mo} is the microorganism mass density; *θ* is the average volume of a microorganism; and *D*_{mo} is the diffusivity of microorganisms (in this model, following [44, 45], all random motions of microorganisms are simulated by a diffusion process).

*Ln*, and a modified diffusivity ratio,

*N*

_{ A }(this parameter is somewhat similar to the Soret parameter that arises in cross-diffusion phenomena in solutions), are defined as:

where *D*_{B} is the Brownian diffusion coefficient of nanoparticles and *D*_{T} is the thermophoretic diffusion coefficient.

*N*

_{ B }is a modified particle-density increment, defined as:

where (*ρc*)_{p} is the volumetric heat capacity of the nanoparticles.

**V**is the dimensionless swimming velocity of a microorganism,

**V***

*H*/

*α*

_{f}, which is calculated as [44, 45]:

*C*is the dimensionless oxygen concentration, defined as:

where *C** is the dimensional oxygen concentration, ${C}_{0}^{\ast}$ is the upper-surface oxygen concentration (the upper surface is assumed to be open to atmosphere), and ${C}_{\mathrm{min}}^{\ast}$ is the minimum oxygen concentration that microorganisms need to be active. Equation 11 thus assumes that microorganisms swim up the oxygen concentration gradient and that their swimming velocity is proportional to that gradient; however, in order for microorganisms to be active the oxygen concentration need to be above ${C}_{\mathrm{min}}^{\ast}$. Since this article deals with a shallow layer situation, it is assumed that ${C}^{\ast}>{C}_{\mathrm{min}}^{\ast}$ throughout the layer thickness, and the Heaviside step function, $\widehat{H}\left(C\right)$, in Equation 11 is equal to unity.

*Pe*, in Equation 11 is defined as:

where *b* is the chemotaxis constant (which has the dimension of length) and *W*_{mo} is the maximum swimming speed of a microorganism (the product *bW*_{mo} is assumed to be constant).

The first term on the right-hand side of Equation 14 represents oxygen diffusion, while the second term represents oxygen consumption by microorganisms.

where *Le* is the traditional Lewis number, $\widehat{\beta}$ is the dimensionless parameter describing oxygen consumption by the microorganisms, *D*_{
S
}is the diffusivity of oxygen, and *γ* is a dimensional constant describing consumption of oxygen by the microorganisms.

Equation 16 gives the maximum layer depth for which the oxygen concentration at the bottom does not drop below ${C}_{\mathrm{min}}^{\ast}$.

The fifth equation in (18) is equivalent to the statement that the total flux of microorganisms at the upper surface is equal to zero: the microorganisms swim vertically upward at the top surface but (because their concentration gradient at the top surface is directed vertically upward) they are simultaneously pushed downward by diffusion; the two fluxes are equal but opposite in direction).

### Basic state

*A*

_{1}is the smallest positive root of the transcendental equation

The solutions given by Equations 23 and 24 were first reported in [44].

*p*

_{b}(

*z*), can then be obtained by integrating the following form of the momentum equation (which follows from Equation 2):

*α*

_{f}= 2 × 10

^{-7}m

^{2}/s,

*D*

_{B}= 4 × 10

^{-11}m

^{2}/s,

*μ*= 10

^{-3}Pas, and

*ρ*

_{f0}= 10

^{3}kg/m

^{3}. The thermophoretic diffusion coefficient,

*D*

_{T}, is estimated as $\tau \frac{\mu}{\rho}{\varphi}_{0}^{\ast}$, where, according to Buongiorno [43],

*τ*is estimated as 0.006. This results in

*D*

_{T}= 6 × 10

^{-11}m

^{2}/s. The nanoparticle Lewis number is then estimated as

*Ln*= 5.0 × 10

^{3}. The modified diffusivity ratio,

*N*

_{ A }, and the modified particle-density increment,

*N*

_{ B }, depend on the temperature difference between the lower and the upper plates and on the nanoparticle fraction decrement. Assuming that ${T}_{h}^{*}-{T}_{c}^{*}=1\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\text{K}$, ${\varphi}_{1}^{*}-{\varphi}_{0}^{*}=0.001$, and ${T}_{c}^{*}=300\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\text{K}$, gives the following estimates:

*N*

_{ A }= 5 and

*N*

_{ B }= 7.5 × 10

^{-4}. This suggests that the exponents in Equations 21 and 22 are small and that these equations can be simplified as:

### Linear instability analysis

*Rm*since this parameter is just a measure of the basic static pressure gradient. In order to eliminate the pressure and horizontal components of velocity from Equations 30 and 31, Equation 31 (see [46]) is operated with $\widehat{k}\cdot \text{curlcurl}$ and the use is made of the identity curl curl ≡ grad div - ∇

^{2}together with Equation 30. This results in the reduction of Equations 30 and 31 to the following scalar equation which involves only one component of the perturbation velocity,

*w*':

where ${\nabla}_{\text{H}}^{2}$ is the two-dimensional Laplacian operator in the horizontal plane and ∇^{4}*w'* is the Laplacian of the Laplacian of *w'*.

*f*(

*x,y*) satisfies the following equation:

and *m* is the dimensionless horizontal wavenumber.

*Pe*and $\widehat{\beta}$ individually), the following equations for the amplitudes,

*W*, Θ, Φ,

*N*, and $\overline{\Xi}$, are obtained:

*A*

_{1}is reduced to

In Equations 42 to 46 *s* is a dimensionless growth factor; for neutral stability the real part of *s* is zero, so it is written *s* = *iω*, where *ω* is a dimensionless frequency (it is a real number).

and *A*_{1} is given by Equation 47.

*W*

_{1}is replaced by

and the rest of the trial functions are still given by Equation 51. *W*_{1} given by Equation 53 satisfies the boundary condition given by Equation 50.

## Results and discussion

### Rigid-rigid boundaries

*Ra*,

*Rn*, and

*Rb*:

where functions *F*_{1}, *F*_{2}, *F*_{3}, and *F*_{4} are given in the appendix [see Equations A1 to A4], they depend on *Lb*, *Le*, *Ln*, *Pr*, *N*_{
A
}, *ϖ*, *ω*, and *m*. It is interesting that Equation 54 is independent of *N*_{
B
}at this order (one-term Galerkin) of approximation.

In order to evaluate the accuracy of the one-term Galerkin approximation used in obtaining Equation 54 the accuracy of this equation is estimated for the case of non-oscillatory instability (which corresponds to *ω* = 0) for the situation when the suspension contains no microorganisms (this corresponds to ${n}_{0}^{\ast}=0$, which leads to *Rb* = 0) and no nanoparticles (this leads to *Rn* = 0).

The right-hand side of Equation 55 takes the minimum value of 1750 at *m*_{c} = 3.116; the obtained critical value of *Ra* is 2.5% greater than the exact value (1707.762) for this problem reported in [48]. The corresponding critical value of the wavenumber is 0.03% smaller than the exact value (3.117) reported in [48].

Based on the data presented in [44, 45] for soil bacterium *Bacillus subtilis*, the following parameter values for these microorganisms are used: *D*_{m} = 1.3 × 10^{-10} m^{2}/s, *D*_{s} = 2.12 × 10^{-9} m^{2}/s, Δ*ρ* = 100 kg/m^{3}, ${n}_{0}^{*}={10}^{15}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}{\text{cells/m}}^{\text{3}}$, *θ* = 10^{-18} m^{3}, and *H* = 2.5 × 10^{-3} m (or 2.5 mm, this is a typical depth of a shallow layer; this size is also typical for a microdevice). Also, according to Hillesdon et al. [45], for *Bacillus subtilis* dimensionless parameters can be estimated as follows: *Pe* = 15*H*, $\widehat{\beta}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}=7{H}^{2}/\text{Le}$, where the layer depth, *H*, must be given in mm. Based on [43], the following parameter values for a typical alumina/water nanofluid are utilized: ${\varphi}_{0}^{*}=0.01$, *ρ*_{f0} = 10^{3} kg/m^{3}, *ρ*_{p} = 4 × 10^{3} kg/m^{3}, (*ρc*)_{p} = 3.1 × 10^{6} J/m^{3}, *α*_{f} = 2 × 10^{-7} m^{2}/s, *D*_{B} = 4 × 10^{-11} m^{2}/s, *D*_{T} = 6 × 10^{-11} m^{2}/s, and *μ* = 10^{-3} Pas. It is also assumed that ${\varphi}_{1}^{*}-{\varphi}_{0}^{*}=0.001$, *β* = 3.4 × 10^{-3}1/K, (*ρ*_{
C
})_{f} = 4 × 10^{6}J/m^{3}, ${T}_{h}^{*}-{T}_{c}^{*}=1\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\text{K}$, and ${T}_{c}^{*}=300\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\text{K}$.

The parameter values given above result in the following representative values of dimensionless parameters: *Lb* = 1.5 × 10^{3}, *Le* = 94, *Ln* = 5.0 × 10^{3}, *Pr* = 5.0, *N*_{
A
}= 5, *N*_{
B
}= 7.5 × 10^{-4}, *Pe* = 37, $\widehat{\beta}=0.46$, ϖ = 17, *Ra* = 2.7 × 10^{3}, *Rb* = 1.2 × 10^{5}, *Rm* = 8.0 × 10^{5}, and *Rn* = 2.3 × 10^{3}. The values of *Ra* and *Rb* can be controlled by changing the temperature difference between the plates and the microorganism concentration, respectively, and *Rn* depends on nanoparticle concentrations at the boundaries.

*Lb*= 1500,

*Le*= 94,

*Ln*= 5000,

*Pr*= 5,

*N*

_{A}= 5,

*ϖ*= 17, and

*Rb*= 0 (which corresponds to the situation with zero concentration of microorganisms).

*Rn*is changing in the range between -1.2 and 1.2. In Figure 1a, the boundary for non-oscillatory instability (shown by a solid line) is obtained by setting

*ω*to zero in Equation 54, solving this equation for

*Ra*and then finding the minimum with respect to

*m*of the right-hand side of the obtained equation. The boundary for oscillatory instability (shown by a dotted line) is obtained by the following procedure. Two coupled equations are produced by taking the real and imaginary parts of Equation 54. One of these equations is used to eliminate

*ω*, and the resulting equation is then solved for

*Ra*; the critical value of

*Ra*is again obtained by calculating the minimum value that the expression for

*Ra*takes with respect to

*m*.

Figure 1a shows that for *Rb* = 0 the curve representing the instability boundary for non-oscillatory convection (solid line) is a straight line in the (*Ra*_{c}, *Rn*) plane. *Rn* is defined in Equation 5 in such a way that positive *Rn* corresponds to a top-heavy nanoparticle distribution. Therefore, the increase of *Rn* produces the destabilizing effect and reduces the critical value of *Ra*. A comparison between instability boundaries for non-oscillatory (solid line) and oscillatory (dotted line) cases indicates that in order for the oscillatory instability to occur, *Rn* generally must be negative, which corresponds to a bottom-heavy (stabilizing) nanoparticle distribution. In this case the destabilizing effect of the temperature gradient (positive *Ra* corresponds to heating from the bottom) and destabilizing effect from upswimming of oxytactic microorganisms compete with the stabilizing effect of the nanoparticle distribution.

Figure 1b shows that the critical value of the wavenumber, *m*_{c}, is independent of *Rn* and for the case displayed in Figure 1a (*Rb* = 0) is equal to 3.116; also, it is almost independent of the mode of instability (non-oscillatory versus oscillatory).

Figure 1c shows the square of the oscillation frequency, *ω*^{2}, versus the nanoparticle concentration Rayleigh number, *Rn*. The value of *ω*^{2} for the oscillatory instability boundary is obtained by eliminating *Ra* from the two coupled equations resulting from taking the real and imaginary parts of Equation 54 and solving the resulting equation for *ω*^{2}. The solution is presented in terms of *ω*^{2} rather than *ω* because the resulting equation is bi-quadratic in *ω*. For oscillatory instability to occur, *ω*^{2} must be positive so that *ω* is real. Figure 1c shows that for *Rb* = 0 *ω* is real when *Rn* is negative.

*Rb*= 120000. Figure 2a,b,c thus shows the effect of microorganisms. By comparing Figure 2a with 1a, it is evident that the presence of microorganisms produces the destabilizing effect and reduces the critical value of

*Ra*. For example, at (

*N*

_{ A }+

*Ln*)

*Rn*= -5000 in Figure 1a the value of

*Ra*

_{c}corresponding to the non-oscillatory instability boundary is 6750 and in Figure 2a the corresponding value of

*Ra*

_{c}is 6437. At (

*N*

_{ A }+

*Ln*)

*Rn*= 5000 in Figure 1a the value of

*Ra*

_{c}corresponding to the non-oscillatory instability boundary is -3250 and in Figure 2a the corresponding value of

*Ra*

_{c}is -3563. The destabilizing effect of oxytactic microorganisms is explained as follows. These microorganisms are heavier than water and on average they swim in the upward direction. Therefore, the presence of microorganisms produces a top-heavy density stratification and contributes to destabilizing the suspension.

The comparison of Figure 2b with 1b shows that the presence of microorganisms increases the critical wavenumber (in Figure 1b it was 3.116 and in Figure 2b it is 3.441).

Figure 2c brings an interesting insight. Apparently, if the concentration of microorganisms is above a certain value, the oscillatory mode of instability is not possible. Indeed, *ω*^{2} in Figure 2c is negative for the whole range of *Rn* (-1.2 ≤ *Rn* ≤ 1.2) used for computing this figure. This means that *ω* is imaginary and oscillatory instability does not occur for the value of *Rb* used in computing Figure 2.

### Rigid-free boundaries

where functions *F*_{5}, *F*_{6}, *F*_{7}, and *F*_{8} are given in the appendix [see Equations A10 to A13].

*ω*= 0) for the situation when the suspension contains no microorganisms (

*Rb*= 0) and no nanoparticles (

*Rn*0). In this limiting case Equation 56 collapses to

The right-hand side of Equation 57 takes the minimum value of 1139 at *m*_{c}=2.670; the obtained value of *Ra*_{c} is 3.48% greater than the exact value (1100.65) for this problem reported in [48]. The corresponding critical value of the wavenumber is 0.45% smaller than the exact value (2.682) reported in [48].

*Rb*= 0 (no microorganisms), shows boundaries of non-oscillatory and oscillatory instabilities. This figure is similar to Figure 1a, but since now the case of the rigid-free boundaries is considered, the values of the critical Rayleigh number in Figure 3a are smaller than those in Figure 1a. Again, the comparison between the non-oscillatory and oscillatory instability boundaries indicates that in order for oscillatory instability to occur

*Rn*must be negative; in this case at the instability boundary the effect of the nanoparticle distribution is stabilizing and the effect of the temperature gradient is destabilizing; the presence of these two competing agencies makes the oscillatory instability possible.

The critical wavenumber shown in Figure 3b (*m*_{c} = 2.670) is smaller than the corresponding critical wavenumber for the rigid-rigid boundaries shown in Figure 1b. Again, it is independent of *Rn* and almost independent of the mode of instability (non-oscillatory versus oscillatory).

Figure 3c, similar to Figure 1c, shows that *ω* is real when *Rn* is negative, which means that for negative values of *Rn* oscillatory instability is indeed possible.

*Rb*= 120000, meaning that the difference with Figure 3a,b,c is the presence of microorganisms. As in the case with rigid-rigid boundaries, the presence of microorganisms produces a destabilizing effect and reduces the critical value of the Rayleigh number (compare Figures 4a and 3a).

Also, the presence of microorganisms increases the critical value of the wavenumber (compare Figures 4b and 3b).

Figure 4c again shows that for the range of Rn used for this figure the presence of microorganisms makes the oscillatory mode of instability impossible (corresponding values of *ω* are imaginary).

## Conclusions

The possibility of oscillatory mode of instability in a nanofluid suspension that contains oxytactic microorganisms is investigated. Since these microorganisms swim up the oxygen concentration gradient, toward the free surface (which is open to the air), and they are heavier than water, they always produce the destabilising effect on the suspension. The destabilizing effect of microorganisms is larger if their concentration in the suspension is larger. The concentration of microorganisms is measured by the bioconvection Rayleigh number, *Rb*, which by definition is always non-negative (the zero value of *Rb* corresponds to a suspension with no microorganisms). The increase of *Rb* thus destabilizes the suspension. It is also shown that the presence of microorganisms increases the critical wavenumber.

The effect of the temperature distribution can be either stabilizing (heating from the top, negative thermal Rayleigh number *Ra*) or destabilizing (heating from the bottom, positive *Ra*). The effect of nanoparticles can also be stabilizing (bottom-heavy nanoparticle distribution, negative nanoparticle concentration Rayleigh number *Rn*) or destabilizing (top-heavy nanoparticle distribution, positive *Rn*).

The results obtained in this article indicate that in order for the oscillatory instability to occur, *Rn* generally must be negative, which corresponds to a bottom-heavy (stabilizing) nanoparticle distribution. In this case the destabilizing effect of the temperature gradient (positive *Ra*) and destabilizing effect from upswimming of oxytactic microorganisms compete with the stabilizing effect of the nanoparticle distribution.

In order for the oscillatory mode of instability to occur, the dimensionless oscillation frequency, *ω*, must be real. Since increasing *Rb* pushes *ω*^{2} to negative values, oscillatory instability is possible only if the concentration of microorganisms is below a certain value.

The results for the rigid-rigid and rigid-free boundaries are similar, but the critical Rayleigh number for the rigid-free boundaries is smaller. The critical wavenumber for the rigid-free boundaries can be either smaller or larger, depending on the concentration of microorganisms. For *Rb* = 0 the critical wavenumber is smaller for the rigid-free boundaries but for *Rb* = 120000 it is larger than for the rigid-rigid boundaries.

## Appendix

*F*

_{1},

*F*

_{2},

*F*

_{3}, and

*F*

_{4}defining the eigenvalue equation for the layer with the rigid-rigid boundaries [given by Equation 54] are

*I*

_{1}to

*I*

_{5}in Equations A1 to A4 are functions of

*Le*and

*ϖ*. The expressions for these integrals for the rigid upper boundary case are given below:

*F*

_{5},

*F*

_{6},

*F*

_{7}, and

*F*

_{8}defining the eigenvalue equation for the layer with the rigid-free boundaries [given by Equation 56] are

*Le*and

*ϖ*. The expressions for these integrals for the stress-free upper boundary case are given below:

## Declarations

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Choi SUS: Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. In
*Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows*.*Volume 99*. Edited by: Siginer DA, Wang HP. New York: ASME; 1995.Google Scholar - Choi SUS: Nanofluids: From vision to reality through research.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2009, 131: 033106. 10.1115/1.3056479View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lee S, Choi SUS, Li S, Eastman JA: Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*1999, 121: 280. 10.1115/1.2825978View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Choi SUS, Zhang ZG, Yu W, Lockwood FE, Grulke EA: Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions.
*Appl Phys Lett*2001, 79: 2252. 10.1063/1.1408272View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ: Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles.
*Appl Phys Lett*2001, 78: 718. 10.1063/1.1341218View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Choi SUS, Zhang Z, Keblinski P: Nanofluids. In
*Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology*.*Volume 757*. Edited by: Nalwa H. New York: American Scientific Publishers; 2004.Google Scholar - Das S, Choi SUS, Yu W, Pradeep T:
*Nanofluids Science and Technology*. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar - Jang SP, Choi SUS: Role of brownian motion in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids.
*Appl Phys Lett*2004, 84: 4316. 10.1063/1.1756684View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jang SP, Choi SUS: Effects of various parameters on nanofluid thermal conductivity.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2007, 129: 617. 10.1115/1.2712475View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vadasz JJ, Govender S, Vadasz P: Heat transfer enhancement in nano-fluids suspensions: Possible mechanisms and explanations.
*Int J Heat Mass Transf*2005, 48: 2673. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.01.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vadasz P: Heat conduction in nanofluid suspensions.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2006, 128: 465. 10.1115/1.2175149View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wu C, Cho TJ, Xu J, Lee D, Yang B, Zachariah MR: Effect of nanoparticle clustering on the effective thermal conductivity of concentrated silica colloids.
*Phys Rev E*2010, 81: 011406. 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.011406View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bai C, Wang L: Constructal design of particle volume fraction in nanofluids.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2009, 131: 112402. 10.1115/1.3155002View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bai C, Wang L: Constructal allocation of nanoparticles in nanofluids.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2010, 132: 052404. 10.1115/1.4000473View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Fan J, Wang L: Constructal design of nanofluids.
*Int J Heat Mass Transf*2010, 53: 4238. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.05.050View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bejan A, Lorente S: Constructal theory of generation of configuration in nature and engineering.
*J Appl Phys*2006, 100: 041301. 10.1063/1.2221896View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bejan A, Lorente S:
*Design with Constructal Theory*. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bejan A, Lorente S:
*Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci*. 2010, 365: 1335. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0302View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bello-Ochende T, Meyer JP, Bejan A: Constructal multi-scale pin-fins.
*Int J Heat Mass Transf*2010, 53: 2773. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.02.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wu X, Wu H, Cheng P: Pressure drop and heat transfer of Al2O3-H2O nanofluids through silicon microchannels.
*J Micromech Microeng*2009, 19: 105020. 10.1088/0960-1317/19/10/105020View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Do KH, Jang SP: Effect of nanofluids on the thermal performance of a flat micro heat pipe with a rectangular grooved wick.
*Int J Heat Mass Transf*2010, 53: 2183. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ebrahimi S, Sabbaghzadeh J, Lajevardi M, Hadi I: Cooling performance of a microchannel heat sink with nanofluids containing cylindrical nanoparticles (carbon nanotubes).
*Heat Mass Transf*2010, 46: 549. 10.1007/s00231-010-0599-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Fan X, Chen H, Ding Y, Plucinski PK, Lapkin AA: Potential of 'nanofluids' to further intensify microreactors.
*Green Chem*10: 670. 208 208 10.1039/b717943j - Li H, Liu S, Dai Z, Bao J, Yang Z: Applications of nanomaterials in electrochemical enzyme biosensors.
*Sensors*2009, 9: 8547. 10.3390/s91108547View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Munir A, Wang J, Zhou HS: Dynamics of capturing process of multiple magnetic nanoparticles in a flow through microfluidic bioseparation system.
*IET Nanobiotechnol*2009, 3: 55. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2008.0015View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Hsin HY, Ingber DE: Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip.
*Science*2010, 328: 1662. 10.1126/science.1188302View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wang L, Fan J: Nanofluids research: Key issues.
*Nanoscale Res Lett*2010, 5: 1241. 10.1007/s11671-010-9638-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sokolov A, Goldstein RE, Feldchtein FI, Aranson IS: Enhanced mixing and spatial instability in concentrated bacterial suspensions.
*Phys Rev E*2009, 80: 031903. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.031903View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Tsai T, Liou D, Kuo L, Chen P: Rapid mixing between ferro-nanofluid and water in a semi-active Y-type micromixer.
*Sensors Actuators A Phys*2009, 153: 267. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.05.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shitanda I, Yoshida Y, Tatsuma T: Microimaging of algal bioconvection by scanning electrochemical microscopy.
*Anal Chem*2007, 79: 4237. 10.1021/ac070150tView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pedley TJ: Instability of uniform micro-organism suspensions revisited.
*J Fluid Mech*2010, 647: 335. 10.1017/S0022112010000108View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pedley TJ, Hill NA, Kessler JO: The growth of bioconvection patterns in a uniform suspension of gyrotactic microorganisms.
*J Fluid Mech*1988, 195: 223. 10.1017/S0022112088002393View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kuznetsov AV: Thermo-bioconvection in a suspension of oxytactic bacteria.
*Int Commun Heat Mass Transf*2005, 32: 991. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.11.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kuznetsov AV: Investigation of the onset of thermo-bioconvection in a suspension of oxytactic microorganisms in a shallow fluid layer heated from below.
*Theor Comput Dyn*2005, 19: 287. 10.1007/s00162-005-0167-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kuznetsov AV: The onset of thermo-bioconvection in a shallow fluid saturated porous layer heated from below in a suspension of oxytactic microorganisms.
*Eur J Mech B Fluids*2006, 25: 223. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2005.06.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Avramenko AA, Kuznetsov AV: Bio-thermal convection caused by combined effects of swimming of oxytactic bacteria and inclined temperature gradient in a shallow fluid layer.
*Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow*2010, 20: 157. 10.1108/09615531011016939View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kuznetsov AV, Avramenko AV: Effect of small particles on the stability of bioconvection in a suspension of gyrotactic microorganisms in a layer of finite depth.
*Int Commun Heat Mass Transf*2004, 31: 1. 10.1016/S0735-1933(03)00196-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Geng P, Kuznetsov AV: Effect of small solid particles on the development of bioconvection plumes.
*Int Commun Heat Mass Transf*2004, 31: 629. 10.1016/S0735-1933(04)00050-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Geng P, Kuznetsov AV: Settling of bidispersed small solid particles in a dilute suspension containing gyrotactic micro-organisms.
*Int J Eng Sci*2005, 43: 992. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2005.03.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kuznetsov AV, Geng P: The interaction of bioconvection caused by gyrotactic micro-organisms and settling of small solid particles.
*Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow*2005, 15: 328. 10.1108/09615530510590597View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Geng P, Kuznetsov AV: Introducing the concept of effective diffusivity to evaluate the effect of bioconvection on small solid particles.
*Int J Transp Phenom*2005, 7: 321.Google Scholar - Kuznetsov AV: Non-oscillatory and oscillatory nanofluid bio-thermal convection in a horizontal layer of finite depth.
*Eur J Mech B Fluids*2011, 30(2):156–165. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.10.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Buongiorno J: Convective transport in nanofluids.
*J Heat Transf Trans ASME*2006, 128: 240. 10.1115/1.2150834View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hillesdon AJ, Pedley TJ, Kessler JO: The development of concentration gradients in a suspension of chemotactic bacteria.
*Bull Math Biol*1995, 57: 299.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hillesdon AJ, Pedley TJ: Bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic bacteria: Linear theory.
*J Fluid Mech*1996, 324: 223. 10.1017/S0022112096007902View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV: The onset of convection in a horizontal nanofluid layer of finite depth.
*Eur J Mech B Fluids*2010, 217: 052405.Google Scholar - Finlayson BA:
*The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles*. New York: Academic Press; 1972.Google Scholar - Chandrasekhar S:
*Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability*. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1961.Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.