Crystal and electronic structure of PbTe/CdTe nanostructures
 Małgorzata Bukała^{1}Email author,
 Piotr Sankowski^{2},
 Ryszard Buczko^{1} and
 Perła Kacman^{1}
DOI: 10.1186/1556276X6126
© Bukała et al; licensee Springer. 2011
Received: 23 September 2010
Accepted: 10 February 2011
Published: 10 February 2011
Abstract
In this article, the authors reported a theoretical study of structural and electronic properties of PbTe inclusions in CdTe matrix as well as CdTe nanoclusters in PbTe matrix. The structural properties are studied by ab initio methods. A tightbinding model is constructed to calculate the electron density of states (DOS) of the systems. In contrast to the ab initio methods, the latter allows studying nanostructures with diameters comparable to the real ones. The calculations show that both kinds of inclusions lead to changes of the DOS of the carriers near the Fermi level, which may affect optical, electrical and thermoelectric properties of the material. These changes depend on the size, shape, and concentration of inclusions.
Introduction
PbTe is a wellknown narrowgap semiconductor. This material is widely used for midinfrared lasers and detectors [1, 2]. Moreover, PbTe has attracted a lot of interest due to its thermoelectric properties, and the material is used for smallscale cooling applications as well as for power generation in remote areas [3, 4]. The efficiency of a thermoelectric device is described by the dimensionless thermoelectric figureofmerit parameter ZT. In the currently used thermoelectric devices based on PbTe, SiGe, or Bi_{2}Te_{3} alloys, ZT reaches 1. This value imposes limitation to possible applications of semiconductor thermoelectric devices, and a lot of effort is put to increase the parameter.
Increased ZT values were observed in various low dimensional nanostructures, like quantum wells or coupled semiconductor quantum dot (QD) systems of PbTe or Bi_{2}Te_{3}[5–7]. These observations were explained by the fact that introducing defects or nanoinclusions, i.e. creating materials with nanometerscaled morphology reduces dramatically the thermal conductivity by scattering phonons. In nanostructures composed of canonical thermoelectric materials, an increase of the ZT parameter is also expected, because the qualitative changes of electronic density of states (DOS) in quantum wells, wires, and dots should increase the Seebeck coefficient. Indeed, new materials with improved electronic and thermal properties were obtained by an enhancement of DOS in the vicinity of the Fermi level. In Ref. [8], an enhancement of thermoelectric efficiency of PbTe by distortion of the electronic DOS using thallium impurity levels was reported.
The studies of pseudobinary alloys consisting of PbTe inclusions in CdTe matrix started with the discovery of sharp PbTeCdTe superlattices [9]. PbTe and CdTe have nearly the same cubic lattice constant a _{0}: 0.646 and 0.648 nm, respectively. It should be recalled that lead telluride crystallizes in rocksalt (RS) structure while cadmium telluride crystallizes in zincblende (ZB) structure. The materials can be represented by the two, cation and anion, interpenetrating fcc sublattices. In both cases, the cation sublattice is shifted with respect to the Te anion sublattice along the body diagonal [1, 1, 1]; in the RS structure it is shifted by a _{0}/2, whereas in the ZB structure by a _{0}/4. Nanometersized clusters (QDs) of PbTe in CdTe matrix were obtained by a proper choice of the MBEgrowth temperature and/or postgrowth thermal treatment conditions [10, 11]. Such system, which consists of QDs of a narrow energy gap material in wider gap matrix, is excellent for infrared optoelectronic applications. Careful theoretical studies of the interfaces between PbTe dots and CdTe matrix were reported in Ref. [12–15]. These structures are not conducting and seem to be of no thermoelectric relevance. However, chains of PbTe QDs or PbTe quantum wires (NWs) embedded in a CdTe matrix can have interesting thermoelectric properties. Recently, it was also shown that nanometersized clusters of widegap CdTe in narrowgap PbTe matrix, which will be called quantum antidots (AQD), can be obtained and can lead to a considerable increase of the thermoelectric figureofmerit parameter ZT[16].
In this article, a systematic theoretical study of PbTeCdTe pseudobinary systems is presented. Using ab initio and tightbinding methods, three kinds of inclusions are studied: the PbTe NWs in CdTe matrix; the CdTe AQDs; and antiwires (ANWs) in PbTe matrix. The aim of this research is to check how introducing nanostructures of different size and shape changes DOS of the carriers near the Fermi level.
Model nanostructures and calculation method
For nanostructures, containing less than 500 atoms in the unit cell, all the atomic positions are calculated using the first principles methods based on the density functional theory, with full relaxation and rebonding allowed. Ab initio calculations are performed with the Vienna ab initio simulation package[17, 18]. For the atomic cores, the projectoraugmented wave pseudopotentials [19] are used. The exchange correlation energy is calculated using the local density approximation. The atomic coordinates are relaxed with a conjugate gradient technique. The criterion that the maximum force is smaller than 0.01 eV/Å is used to determine equilibrium configurations. Since the impact of nonscalar relativistic effects on the structural features is negligible [12, 20], these effects are not taken into account.
The obtained relaxed structures are further used in the calculations of electron DOS, which are performed within the tightbinding approximation. We use the combined, ab initio and tightbinding, approach because calculating the DOS by first principles is very time consuming and does not lead to proper values of the energy gaps. The time of tightbinding calculations scales considerably slower with the number of atoms in the studied objects, and this method allows studying structures with more realistic dimensions.
Both materials, CdTe and PbTe, are described using the sp ^{3} atomic orbitals, with the interactions between the nearest neighbours and the spinorbit coupling (SOC) included. The empirical tightbinding parameters for CdTe, which lead to proper values of the energy gaps and effective masses in the valence and conduction bands, are taken after Ref. [21]. For PbTe, it was verified that the tightbinding parameters available in the literature [22, 23] do not lead to the effective masses determined experimentally. Thus, a new parameterization of PbTe bulk crystal was performed, which gives not only proper energy values at the important band extremes but also proper values of the longitudinal and perpendicular effective masses at the L point of the Brillouin zone. The details of this parameterization will be presented elsewhere.
To study the PbTe/CdTe systems, the knowledge of the band offsets between these two materials is needed. Since the valence band maxima of PbTe and CdTe are located at different positions in kspace, the valence band offset (VBO) can only be directly accessed in experiments allowing for indirect transitions, i.e. in experiments with momentum transfer to the electrons. However, in many experiments, e.g. in zerophonon photoluminescence measurements or optical absorption spectra, only direct transitions are allowed. In such cases, local band offsets at certain kpoints have to be considered, which are in general larger than the global band offsets [24]. The VBO of PbTe/CdTe (111) heterojunction interface was experimentally determined in Refs. [25, 26]. In Ref. [25], the value of VBO ΔE _{V} = 0.135 ± 0.05 eV was obtained using Xray photoelectron spectroscopy. On the other hand, in Ref. [26], the VBO value ΔE _{V} = 0.09 ± 0.12 eV was determined from the ultraviolet photoelectron spectrum using synchrotron radiation. Theoretically, the VBOs for PbTe/CdTe (100) and (110) interfaces were obtained by Leitsmann et al. [24, 27]. The reported value of the VBO for polar PbTe/CdTe (100) interface is 0.37 ev, and it is 0.42 eV for the nonpolar PbTe/CdTe (110) interface. These values were obtained without the SOC. Adding the spinorbit interaction diminished the VBO nearly to zero. Because of the large spread of these values and because experimental data are determined with very big errors, it has been decided to obtain the VBO by another ab initio procedure. Using a model of nonpolar (110) PbTe/CdTe interface, first the projected densities of states (PDOS) for two different Te atoms, both situated far from the interface (one in PbTe and the second in CdTe material) are calculated. In this calculation, the spinorbit interactions were taken into account, because the electronic properties of PbTe are largely influenced by SOC [24]. Next, the densities of the deep dstates of the Te atom far from the interface with the Te atom in the bulk material are compared, also with SOC included. The above comparison is performed both for PbTe and CdTe. It is observed that each of the obtained PDOS is shifted in energy relative to PDOS of Te atoms in the bulk material. The sum of these differences gives us the VBO between PbTe and CdTe, which is equal to 0.19 eV.
Another problem, which needs to be solved, is related to the tightbinding description of the Te ions at the interfaces. The relevant integrals between the Te and Cd states are simply taken equal to those in CdTe. Similarly, the integrals between Pb and Te are assumed to be like in PbTe. The integrals are scaled with the square of the distances between the atoms and with the directional cosines. The problem appears when the energy values for s and p states of Te have to be chosenthey can be equal to the energies of Te either in CdTe or in PbTe. They can also be somehow weighted by taking into account the number of appropriate neighbours. In our study of the twodimensional PbTe/CdTe heterostructures, all the three possibilities have been checked. It is observed that taking the energies of Te like in PbTe is the only way to avoid interface states in the PbTe band gap. Since experimentally these states have not been observed, in the following the Te atoms in the interface region are treated like atoms in PbTe.
The DOS is calculated near the top of the valence band (in ptype) or the bottom of the conduction band (in ntype). To check how introducing nanostructures of different size and shape changes DOS of the carriers near the Fermi level, the results have to be compared with the DOS for bulk material. In all the studied structures the same carrier concentration n (or p) = 10^{19} cm^{3} is assumed. The energy zero is always put at the resulting Fermi level. As the total DOS depends on the size of the supercell, it should be normalized to the number of atoms. It was checked, however, that the DOS in the vicinity of the Fermi level in the PbTe/CdTe structures is equal to the DOS projected on the atoms in PbTe region. This means that, near the Fermi level, the DOS in the studied structures is determined by the states of electrons localized in PbTe. Thus, the DOS of these structures is normalized to the number of atoms in PbTe region only.
Results
Conclusions
Using ab initio and tightbinding methods, the DOS for three kinds of PbTeCdTe pseudobinary systems is studied, i.e. PbTe NWs embedded in CdTe matrix; the CdTe AQDs; and ANWs in PbTe matrix. The results of our calculations show that quantum confinement of PbTe wires leads to 1 D subbands and changes dramatically the derivative of the electron DOS at the Fermi level. In the case of CdTe antiinclusions (ANWs and AQDs), the DOS of carriers in PbTe matrix depends on both the diameter and the concentration of the antiinclusions. This study shows that both kinds of inclusions, i.e. RS PbTe clusters in ZB CdTe matrix and CdTe nanoclusters in PbTe, lead to considerable changes of the derivative of the carrier DOS at the Fermi level and thus, can influence the thermoelectrical properties of the material. For PbTe NWs the changes are, however, very abrupt and sensitive to the carrier concentration. Thus, it seems that the antistructures are much more suitable for controlled design.
Autors' contributions
MB carried out the ab initio and tightbinding calculations, participated in data analysis and drafted the manuscript. PS made the tightbinding parameterization. RB and PK conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abbreviations
 DOS:

density of states
 NW:

nanowire
 PDOS:

projected densities of states
 QD:

quantum dot
 RS:

rocksalt
 SOC:

spinorbit coupling
 VBO:

valence band offset
 ZB:

zincblende.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The study was partially supported by the European Union within the European Regional Development Fund, through grant Innovative Economy (POIG.01.01.0200108/09), and by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Research Office under Contract/Grant Number W911NF0810231. All the computations were carried out in the Informatics Centre Tricity Academic Computer Net (CI TASK) in Gdansk.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Böberl M, Fromherz T, Roither J, Pillwein G, Springholz G, Heiss W: Room temperature operation of epitaxial leadtelluride detectors monolithically integrated on midinfrared filters. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 041105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rahim M, Arnold M, Felder F, Behfar K, Zogg H: Midinfrared leadchalcogenide vertical external cavity surface emitting laser with 5 μm wavelength. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 151102. 10.1063/1.2798254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Heremans JP, Thrush CM, Morelli DT: Thermopower enhancement in lead telluride nanostructures. Phys Rev B 2004, 70: 115334. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.115334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gelbstein Y, Dashevsky Z, Dariel MP: The search for mechanically stable PbTe based thermoelectric materials. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 033702. 10.1063/1.2963359View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hicks LD, Dresselhaus MS: Effect of quantumwell structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit. Phys Rev B 1993, 47: 12727. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Harman TC, Taylor PJ, Walsh MP, La Forge BE: Quantum Dot Superlattice Thermoelectric Materials and Devices. Science 2002, 297: 2229. 10.1126/science.1072886View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hsu KF, Loo S, Guo F, Chen W, Dyck JS, Uher C, Hogan T, Polychroniadis EK, Kanatzidis MG: Cubic AgPb _{ m } SbTe _{ 2+ m } : Bulk Thermoelectric Materials with High Figure of Merit. Science 2004, 303: 818. 10.1126/science.1092963View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Heremans JP, Jovovic V, Toberer ES, Saramat A, Kurosaki K, Charoenphakdee A, Yamanaka S, Snyder GJ: Enhancement of Thermoelectric Efficiency in PbTe by Distortion of the Electronic Density of States. Science 2008, 321: 554. 10.1126/science.1159725View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Koike K, Honden T, Makabe I, Yan FP, Yano M: PbTe/CdTe single quantum wells grown on GaAs (1 0 0) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 2003, 257: 212. 10.1016/S00220248(03)014659View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Heiss W, Groiss H, Kaufmann E, Hesser G, Böberl M, Springholz G, Schäffler F, Koike K, Harada H, Yano M: Centrosymmetric PbTe/CdTe quantum dots coherently embedded by epitaxial precipitation. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 192109. 10.1063/1.2202107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Schwarzl T, Kaufmann E, Springholz G, Koike K, Hotei T, Yano M, Heiss W: Temperaturedependent midinfrared photoluminescence of epitaxial PbTe/CdTe quantum dots and calculation of the corresponding transition energy. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 165320. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.165320View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leitsmann R, Ramos LE, Bechsted F: Structural properties of PbTe/CdTe interfaces from first principles. Phys Rev B 2006, 74: 085309. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Groiss H, Heiss W, Schäffler F, Leitsmann R, Bechstedt F, Koike K, Harada H, Yano M: The coherent {1 0 0} and {1 1 0} interfaces between rocksaltPbTe and zincblendeCdTe. J Cryst Growth 2007, 301–302: 671. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leitsmann R, Bechsted F: Interplay of shape, interface structure, and electrostatic fields of ionic nanodots embedded in a polar semiconductor matrix. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 205324. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.205324View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leitsmann R, Bechsted F: Ab initio characterization of the electronic properties of PbTe quantum dots embedded in a CdTe matrix. Semicond Sci Technol 2011, 26: 014005. 10.1088/02681242/26/1/014005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ahn K, Han MK, He J, Androulakis J, Ballikaya S, Uher C, Dravid VP, Kanatzidis MG: Exploring Resonance Levels and Nanostructuring in the PbTeCdTe System and Enhancement of the Thermoelectric Figure of Merit. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 5227. 10.1021/ja910762qView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kresse G, Hafner J: Ab inito molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 1993, 47: R558. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kresse G, Hafner J: Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio totalenergy calculations using a planewave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 11169. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Blöchl PE: Projector augmentedwave method. Phys Rev B 1994, 50: 17953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ramos LE, Teles LK, Scolfaro LMR, Castineira JLP, Rosa AL, Leite JR: Structural, electronic, and effectivemass properties of silicon and zincblende groupIII nitride semiconductor compounds. Phys Rev B 2001, 63: 165210. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.165210View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kobayashi A, Sankey OF, Dow JD: Chemical trends for defect energy levels in Hg _{ (1x) } Cd _{ x } Te. Phys Rev B 1982, 25: 6367. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.6367View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kriechbaum M, Kocevar P, Pascher H, Bauer G: PbTe/Pb _{ 1x } Sn _{ x } Te (x≤0.18) Multiquantum Wells: Magnetooptics, FourWave Mixing, and Band Structure. IEEE J Quant Electron 1988, 24: 1727. 10.1109/3.7103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lachhab M, Keegan M, Papaconstantopoulos DA, Mehlc MJ: Electronic structure calculations of PbTe. J Phys Chem Solids 2000, 61: 1639. 10.1016/S00223697(00)000457View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leitsmann R, Bechsted F: Electronicstructure calculations for polar latticestructuremismatched interfaces: PbTe/CdTe(100). Phys Rev B 2007, 76: 125315. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.125315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Si J, Jin S, Zhang H, Zhu P, Qiu D, Wu H: Experimental determination of valence band offset at PbTe/CdTe(111) heterojunction interface by xray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 202101. 10.1063/1.3028028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Cai CF, Wu HZ, Si JX, Jin SQ, Zhang WH, Xu Y, Zhu JF: Energy band alignment of PbTe/CdTe(111) interface determined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectra using synchrotron radiation. Chin Phys B 2010, 19: 077301. 10.1088/16741056/19/7/077301View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Leitsmann R, Bechsted F, Groiss H, Schäffler F, Heiss W, Koike K, Harada H, Yano M: Structural and electronic properties of PbTe (rocksalt)/CdTe (zincblende) interfaces. Appl Surf Sci 2007, 254: 397. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.099View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.