Open Access

Rapid thermal annealing and crystallization mechanisms study of silicon nanocrystal in silicon carbide matrix

  • Zhenyu Wan1Email author,
  • Shujuan Huang1,
  • Martin A Green1 and
  • Gavin Conibeer1
Nanoscale Research Letters20116:129

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-129

Received: 10 November 2010

Accepted: 10 February 2011

Published: 10 February 2011


In this paper, a positive effect of rapid thermal annealing (RTA) technique has been researched and compared with conventional furnace annealing for Si nanocrystalline in silicon carbide (SiC) matrix system. Amorphous Si-rich SiC layer has been deposited by co-sputtering in different Si concentrations (50 to approximately 80 v%). Si nanocrystals (Si-NC) containing different grain sizes have been fabricated within the SiC matrix under two different annealing conditions: furnace annealing and RTA both at 1,100°C. HRTEM image clearly reveals both Si and SiC-NC formed in the films. Much better "degree of crystallization" of Si-NC can be achieved in RTA than furnace annealing from the research of GIXRD and Raman analysis, especially in high-Si-concentration situation. Differences from the two annealing procedures and the crystallization mechanism have been discussed based on the experimental results.


Shockly and Queisser [1] have calculated the upper theoretical efficiency limitation for on p-n junction silicon solar cell as 30%. In order to further obtain a higher efficiency, multi-junction solar cells with different materials have been designed and fabricated [2]. However, to create different band gap solar cell layers, expensive and perhaps toxic materials have to be involved and this is assumed to be the main obstacle for the wide use of multi-junction solar cell. As a result, in recent years, the theory of "all silicon multi-junction solar cell" has been developed [3, 4], and silicon nanocrystals (Si-NCs) in various dielectric materials study have gained researchers' interests in all silicon multi-junction solar cell applications [5]. Due to quantum size effect, three-dimensional quantum-confined silicon dots have been proven to be able to tune the bandgap in a wide range by controlling the dot size. The bandgap of each cell layer can be adjusted by the wavelength of different light spectrum and all silicon multi-junction solar cells with high efficiency can be well expected.

Many research efforts have been allocated in looking for a better dielectric material as a matrix to embed the Si-NC. Comparing the band gap with different materials such as silicon dioxide (approximately 8.9 eV) and silicon nitride (approximately 4.3 eV), the band gap of silicon carbide (approximately 2.4 eV) is the lowest [5]. The small SiC bandgap increases the electron tunnelling probability. Increased carrier transportation performance and greater current can be expected from these multi-junction solar cells. Kurokawa et al. and M. Künle et al. [6, 7] have reported the fabrication of good quality Si-NC in SiC matrix film by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) system. However, the main disadvantages of PECVD deposition are extremely time consuming in superlattice structure and in toxic, explosive, and expensive gases involved, such as silane (SiH4), monomethylsilane (MMS), methane (CH4), and hydrogen (H2) etc. In our group, Si-NCs in a SiC matrix deposited by a sputtering process have been intensively investigated in order to overcome the disadvantages listed above.

In our previous research, Si-NCs are fabricated by post-deposition annealing of Si-rich SiC (SRC) layer in a nitrogen furnace for a long time (more than 1 h) [8, 9]. Both Si and SiC NC have been clearly observed in x-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements when annealing temperature rise above 900°C. After annealing, SiC-NCs in beta phase (β-SiC) as well as amorphous Si are found surrounding the Si-NC. Rapid thermal annealing (RTA) has been considered as a primary annealing technique in semiconductor industry because of the low energy cost and better crystallization result [10, 11] In nanocrystalline system, better crystallization has also been reported in RTA because heating of the structure is caused by light directly absorbed in the layers [12]. In this paper, we compare two annealing techniques: conventional furnace annealing and RTA upon Si and SiC nanocrystalline system, and subsequently research the differences of structural characterization. By investigating the crystallization differences, we try to explain the crystallization mechanism of Si and SiC-NC.

Experimental details

The SRC films are deposited by magnetron co-sputtering a Si and a SiC target at room temperature using a multi-target sputtering machine (AJA International, ATC-2200, North Scituate, MA, USA). Radio frequency (RF, 13.56 MHz) power supplies are connected to the targets. The Si concentration in the SRC films is controlled by adjusting the RF supply power connected to the Si target. The base pressure of the main chamber of deposition was 8.0 × 10- 7 Torr and the working pressure is 2.0 × 10- 3 Torr. Table 1 includes the sample details reported in this paper.
Table 1

Sample names and deposition conditions

Sample name

Silicon-rich concentration

(volume percentage v%)

Sample structure/thickness (nm)



Single layer/approximately 600



Single layer/approximately 600



Single layer/approximately 600



Single layer/approximately 600



Single layer/approximately 600

After deposition, either furnace or RTA annealing is carried out for the purpose of Si precipitation from the matrix. The furnace annealing is processed in nitrogen (N2) ambient at 1,100°C for 1 h with 40 min ramping-up time from 500°C to 1,100°C. The RTA annealing is also processed in N2 ambient at 1,100°C, but with a very short ramping time of 45 s in the same temperature range and much shorter annealing time of 2 min. A detailed temperature ramping profile is listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Temperature ramping profile for conventional furnace annealing and RTA


Room temperature, approximately 500°C

500°C to approximately 900°C

900°C to approximately 1,100°C


Conventional furnace annealing


25 min

15 min

60 min


15 min

30 s

15 s

2 min

The structural properties including the nanocrystal size, shape, and phase separation are studied using TEM (Phillips CM200) at 200 kV. The crystalline properties are evaluated by grazing incidence XRD using a Philips's X'Pert Pro material research diffraction system at a voltage of 45 kV and a current of 40 mA, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The glancing angle of the incident x-ray beam is optimised by omega scan and set between 0.2° and 0.4° The nanocrystal size is estimated using the Scherrer equation. Additional structural properties such as phase separation and crystallinity are studied by Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw, RM2000) in backscattering configuration. The power of the Ar ion laser (514 nm) was reduced below 8 mW to avoid local crystallization by laser beam.

Results and discussion

TEM study

Figures 1 and 2 show the plan view TEM images of the sample SRC50 after RTA and furnace annealing. The volume percentage of Si over SiC is 50 v% from RF sputter rates of Si and SiC are calibrated by crystal thickness monitor. Both images clearly reveal the formation of NC. The NC which is circled by solid lines with a fringe spacing 3.1 Å corresponds to Si (111) lattice plane; and the dash-line which is circled with a fringe spacing of 2.5 Å corresponds to the lattice plane of β-SiC (111) [8]. The nanocrystal size and shape are similar in both annealing conditions, with Si size 6-7 nm and SiC size 2-3.5 nm.
Figure 1

HRTEM plan view of image of SRC50 sample annealed by RTA.
Figure 2

Cross-section TEM image of SRC50 sample annealed by furnace.

X-ray diffraction investigation

The crystalline properties of samples annealed by RTA and furnace are studied by XRD. Figure 3 shows a wide scan XRD curve of the sample SRC60 annealed by furnace. The Bragg peaks can be assigned to cubic Si nanocrystal as well as β-SiC nanocrystal, as shown by the indexes in the graph. This suggests the formation of both Si and β-SiC-NC which is consistent to TEM results.
Figure 3

Wide scan XRD curve of the sample SRC60 annealed by furnace.

Figure 4 compares the XRD spectra of the samples with different Si concentrations after 1,100 C annealing. All the annealed samples show clear Bragg peaks from Si and β-SiC crystallization. In addition, the intensity of Si Bragg peak increases while the SiC peak decreases with the increasing of Si concentration. This phenomenon can be explained by more amorphous silicon (a-Si) is involved in precipitation and crystallization, as a result, higher crystallization volume of crystallized-Si can be achieved. This reason can also be used to explain SiC peaks: when Si concentration increase, SiC concentration decreases, and the volume of SiC crystallinity decreases due to less available a-SiC.
Figure 4

XRD curves of the samples with different Si concentrations after furnace annealing.

It should be noted that there is no Bragg peak of β-SiC phase detected from a sputtered stoichiometric SiC film, indicating that SiC film does not crystallize under 1,100°C annealing condition itself due to insufficient kinetic energy [13]. That both Si and SiC-NC appear in silicon-rich carbide samples could be due to the Si inducement. Some researchers reported sputtered Si starts to crystallize at 900°C [14]. Si and SiC-NC could be observed after annealing at 900°C in our previous research [8, 9]. From these results, we propose that at annealing temperatures of 900°C, the formation of Si-NC [8], act as nuclei for SiC nanocrystal growth. As a result, both Si and SiC diffraction peaks could be observed in silicon-rich carbide samples while no SiC peak observed in sputtered stoichiometric SiC film.

The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of each XRD peak were carefully measured, and the nanocrystal size was calculated by Scherr formula,
G = k λ / Δ ( 2 θ ) cos θ
where λ is the wavelength of the X-rays, θ is the Bragg diffraction angle at the peak position in degrees, Δ(2θ) is the FWHM in radian, and k is a correction factor. The value of k is usually chosen to be 0.9 for Si films. Nanocrystal sizes from RTA and furnace annealing samples are calculated by this formula and are indicated and compared in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Si and SiC grain size from RTA and furnace annealing in different Si concentration.

In both RTA and furnace annealing samples, we can see that when Si concentration increases, Si grain size which is calculated from formula (1) also tends to increase. But the change is not significant until the Si concentration reaches 60 v% and grain size in furnace annealing samples tends to increase faster in high Si concentration (>70 v%). The same trend can also be observed in SiC-NC, the grain size of SiC crystal start to decrease when Si concentration falls below 60 v%.

The degree of Si crystallization can be estimated by the relative intensity of XRD peaks [15]. Figures 6 and 7 compare the RTA and the furnace annealing samples in different concentration. The relative intensity of two Si peaks (at 28.4°) is almost the same under low Si concentration at 50 v% (Figure 6). The intensity difference changes significantly when Si concentration increased to 80 v% (Figure 7). However, the difference of SiC peak intensity barely changes in both Si concentrations.
Figure 6

XRD curve comparison of SRC50 sample by RTA and furnace annealing.
Figure 7

XRD curve comparison of SRC80 sample by RTA and furnace annealing.

We then further measure the intensity of Si peak from XRD result carefully as shown in Figure 8. Under low Si concentration range (50 and 60 v%), Si peak intensity of samples annealed by either RTA or furnace are almost the same. The intensity of RTA samples increased dramatically to two to three times higher compared to the furnace annealing samples when Si concentration increased above 60 v%.
Figure 8

Si peak intensity of different Si concentration by RTA and furnace annealing.

Raman investigation

Figure 9 shows Raman spectrum of furnace annealed SRC60 sample. As we can see, the peak within the range of 400 to 600 cm- 1can be de-convoluted to two main components: the peak centred at approximately 511 cm- 1 corresponds to Si nanocrystal phase and the peak centred at approximately 480 cm- 1 corresponds to the amorphous Si phase [6]. The hump at 400 cm- 1 may be assigned as partial breakdown of Raman selection rules [16]. Meanwhile, two small SiC peaks are also observed at approximately 800 and 940 cm- 1 attributed to the TO and LO of cubic and hexagonal SiC poly types [17, 18].
Figure 9

Raman spectrum of SRC60 after furnace annealing.

The degree of crystallization of Si nanocrystal could also be evaluated by calculating the intensity ratio of the crystalline Si peak and amorphous Si peak: I C-Si/I a-Si[6]. Figure 10 shows the relation of Si peak intensity ratio and silicon concentration in the SRC layers. The results indicate, for both RTA and furnace annealing conditions, when Si concentration increases, higher degree of silicon crystallization and less residual amorphous Si tend to be observed. Meanwhile, the samples from RTA show higher degree of Si crystallization in the matrix, comparing to the furnace annealing, especially in high Si concentration level.
Figure 10

Calculated Si peak intensity ratios ( I C-Si / I a-Si ) in different Si concentration.

Discussion of structural difference and crystallization mechanism

RTA is considered as a positive annealing method in Si/SiC nanocrystalline system compared with furnace annealing. For the purpose of quantitative investigation, we calculate the degree of crystallization in all Si concentration range by comparing the RTA and furnace value ratio (D RTA/D furance) from the result of both XRD Si peak intensity (Figure 8) and Raman peak intensity ratio (Figure 10).

As shown in Table 3, from XRD analysis, the ratio remains at 1 when Si concentration is low (50-60 v%). The value comes to 2.4 under 70 v% Si concentrations and 2.8 under 80 v% Si concentrations. From Raman analysis, we can see the ratio stays also around 1 when in low Si concentration range (50-60 v%), and 2.2 in 70 v% Si concentration and 2.6 in 80 v% Si concentration.
Table 3

Degree of crystallization from RTA and furnace annealing in all Si concentration


Si concentration

(50 to approximately 60 v%)

Si Concentration

(70 v%)

Si Concentration

(80 v%)

++Degree of crystallization: D RTA/D furance (from XRD)




Degree of crystallization: D RTA/D furnace (from Raman)




The Si degree of crystallization ratio behaves in a similar overall increase trend from both XRD and Raman results. It's further confirmed that better Si nanocrystal crystallization could be obtained from RTA since more Si-NC are formed and less amorphous Si remained, especially under high Si concentration.

There are two possible crystal mechanisms to explain the main structural difference coming from RTA and furnace annealing procedure as we discussed above:

1. Si-NC have not reached nucleation equilibrium in RTA

In classical theory of nucleation [19], free energy related to the formation of nanocrystal with radius r in an amorphous matrix can be described as:
Δ G total = 4/3 π r 3 Δ G phase + 4 π r 2 γ
Here, ΔG total is the difference in free energy between the nanocrystal phase and the matrix phase, and γ is the interface energy, ΔG phase is the difference in free energy between the nanocrystal phase and the matrix phase. For negative ΔG phase, the critical nanocrystal size
r * = - 2 γ Δ G phase

When r < r*, because of the decrease of the total free energy, NC tend to reduce in size and vanish in equilibrium. On the other hand, when r > r*, the NC must grow in size to reduce the total free energy until they reach equilibrium.

In our situation, obtaining reliable γ is extremely difficult, but J. K. Bording's group predicted the r* theoretically to be about 2 nm [20] for crystals and this value matches well with all our measured average SiC-NC size value in Figure 5. Basing on this theory, we may conclude, especially in high Si concentration, Si-NC may have not reached the equilibrium before the annealing temperature (1,100°C) drops in RTA. So, Si-NC whose grain size less is than 2 nm may have not completely vanished, thus more Si-NCs would be observed. The grain size increase trend in Figure 5 can further prove this point, we can see in high Si concentration region (70-80 v%) the Si grain size in RTA is smaller than furnace. This means Si-NCs in RTA could still grow up compare with samples of same Si concentration in furnace, which indicates Si-NC have not reached the equilibrium in RTA.

2. Less SiC-NC pre-existed during ramping-up period before Si nanocrystal grow fast at high temperature

This explanation relies on the crystallization sequence. For both annealing techniques, the peak annealing temperatures (1,100°C) are the same, however the duration of temperature raise (from 500-1,100°C) is different. For the RTA system, it takes 45 s to increase but 40 min are needed to ramp up in furnace annealing situation. We believe the time period of temperature ramping up is crucial to Si crystallization process. From the result of Si degree of crystallization, much larger quantity of Si-NC are observed in RTA, which means Si-NC can be crystallized better in short ramping time situation. It may be because of the existence of SiC-NC before Si nanocrystal fast grows. As discussed earlier, Si nanocrystal start to form around 900°C, meanwhile, SiC-NC are induced to crystallize. Short ramping-up time in RTA may lead to less SiC nanocrystal before 1,100°C. As soon as the temperature rise up to Si fast crystallization point at 1,100°C, more Si-NC could be formed in RTA due to the decrease in SiC-NC.


Si-rich SiC (SRC) layers with various Si concentrations were prepared by co-sputtering Si and SiC targets. Furnace annealing and RTA techniques were compared by studying the precipitation and crystallization of Si and SiC-NC with varying Si/SiC ratio after annealing.

Si and SiC-NC were observed by TEM in both furnace and RTA annealed at 1,100°C. SiC-NC are believed to be induced by Si nuclei from XRD spectra analysis. Meanwhile, when silicon concentration raised from 50 to 80 v%, increased size of Si nanocrystal (from 6 nm to 10 to approximately 12 nm) are observed but SiC nanocrystal size remains same (2 to approximately 4 nm).

Compared with furnace annealing, RTA samples reveal a better degree of crystallization on Si nanocrystal and less amorphous Si residual. More Si-NCs are detected by XRD and Raman analysis for this approach. This could possibly be explained by Si-NC not reaching nucleation equilibrium in the RTA or that less SiC-NC are present during the ramping-up period which increases Si-NC crystallization at high temperatures.



The authors thank other members of the Third Generation Group at the ARC Photovoltaics Centre of Excellence for their contributions to this project. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council ARC via its Centres of Excellence scheme.

Authors’ Affiliations

ARC Photovoltaics Centre of Excellence, University of New South Wales (UNSW)


  1. Shockley W, Queisser HJ: Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics 1961, 32(3):510–519. 10.1063/1.1736034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. King RR, Law DC, Edmondson KM, Fetzer CM, Kinsey GS, Yoon H, Sherif RA, Karam NH: 40% efficient metamorphic GaInP/GaInAs/Ge multijunction solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 2007, 90(18):183516. 10.1063/1.2734507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Conibeer G, Green M, Cho EC, König D, Cho YH, Fangsuwannarak T, Scardera G, Pink E, Huang Y, Puzzer T, Huang S, Song D, Flynn C, Park S, Hao X, Mansfield D: Silicon quantum dot nanostructures for tandem photovoltaic cells. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516(20):6748–6756. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.096View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Conibeer G, Green M, Corkish R, Cho Y, Cho EC, Jiang CW, Fangsuwannarak T, Pink E, Huang Y, Puzzer T, Trupke T, Richards B, Shalav A, Lin KL: Silicon nanostructures for third generation photovoltaic solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2006, 511–512: 654–662. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang C, Green MA: Silicon quantum dot superlattices: Modeling of energy bands, densities of states, and mobilities for silicon tandem solar cell applications. Journal of Applied Physics 2006, 99(11):114902. 10.1063/1.2203394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kurokawa Y, Miyajima S, Yamada A, Konagai M: Preparation of nanocrystalline silicon in amorphous silicon carbide matrix. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics Part 2: Letters 2006, 45: 37–41. 10.1143/JJAP.45.L1064Google Scholar
  7. Künle M, Hartel A, Löper P, Janz S, Eibl O: Preparation Of Si-Quantumdots In Sic: Single Layer Vs Multi Layer Approach. In 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference. Hamburg, Germany; 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Song D, Cho EC, Conibeer G, Huang Y, Flynn C, Green MA: Structural characterization of annealed Si1-x Cx/SiC multilayers targeting formation of Si nanocrystals in a SiC matrix. Journal of Applied Physics 2008, 103(8):83544. 10.1063/1.2909913View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Song D, Cho EC, Cho YH, Conibeer G, Huang Y, Huang S, Green MA: Evolution of Si (and SiC) nanocrystal precipitation in SiC matrix. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516(12):3824–3830. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang Y, Liao X, Ma Z, Yue G, Diao H, He J, Kong G, Zhao Y, Li Z, Yun F: Solid-phase crystallization and dopant activation of amorphous silicon films by pulsed rapid thermal annealing. Applied Surface Science 1998, 135(1–4):205–208. 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00230-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Szekeres A, Gartner M, Vasiliu F, Marinov M, Beshkov G: Crystallization of a-Si:H films by rapid thermal annealing. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 1998, 227–230(Part 2):954–957. 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00263-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Arguirov T, Mchedlidze T, Kittler M, Rolver R, Berghoff B, Forst M, Spangenberg B: Residual stress in Si nanocrystals embedded in a SiO[sub 2] matrix. Applied Physics Letters 2006, 89(5):053111. 10.1063/1.2260825View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmidt H, Fotsing ER, Borchardt G, Chassagnon R, Chevalier S, Bruns M: Crystallization kinetics of amorphous SiC films: Influence of substrate. Applied Surface Science 2005, 252(5):1460–1470. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rüther R, Livingstone J, Dytlewski N: Large-grain polycrystalline silicon thin films obtained by low-temperature stepwise annealing of hydrogenated amorphous silicon. Thin Solid Films 1997, 310(1–2):67–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Carvalho AP, Brotas de Carvalho M, Pires J: Degree of crystallinity of dealuminated offretites determined by X-ray diffraction and by a new method based on nitrogen adsorption. Zeolites 1997, 19(5–6):382–386. 10.1016/S0144-2449(97)00101-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zi J, Büscher H, Falter C, Ludwig W, Zhang K, Xie X: Raman shifts in Si nanocrystals. Applied Physics Letters 1996, 69(2):200–202. 10.1063/1.117371View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuenle M, Janz S, Eibl O, Berthold C, Presser V, Nickel KG: Thermal annealing of SiC thin films with varying stoichiometry. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2009, 159–160: 355–360. 10.1016/j.mseb.2008.10.056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakashima S, Harima H: Raman investigation of SiC polytypes. Physica Status Solidi (A) Applied Research 1997, 162(1):39–64. 10.1002/1521-396X(199707)162:1<39::AID-PSSA39>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Riabinina D, Durand C, Margot J, Chaker M, Botton GA, Rosei F: Nucleation and growth of Si nanocrystals in an amorphous Si O2 matrix. Physical Review B 2006, 74(7):075334. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.075334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Bording JK, Taftø J: Molecular-dynamics simulation of growth of nanocrystals in an amorphous matrix. Physical Review B 2000, 62(12):8098. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.8098View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Wan et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.