Open Access

Synthesis and magnetic properties of single-crystalline Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods

  • Changyong Lan1,
  • Jiangfeng Gong1, 2,
  • Shijiang Liu3 and
  • Shaoguang Yang1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20116:133

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-133

Received: 15 October 2010

Accepted: 11 February 2011

Published: 11 February 2011


The synthesis of single-crystalline hollandite-type manganese oxides Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods by a simple molten salt method is reported for the first time. The nanorods were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer. The magnetic measurements indicated that the nanorods showed spin glass behavior and exchange bias effect at low temperatures. The low-temperature magnetic behaviors can be explained by the uncompensated spins on the surface of the nanorods.


One dimensional (1D) nanostructures including nanobelts, nanotubes, nanowires, and nanorods have attracted much attention due to their fascinating physical and chemical properties and their potential applications in nanodevices [1, 2]. Manganese oxides have a wide range of applications such as catalysts [3], ion sieves [4], and battery materials [5]. Much effort has been made to prepare low dimensional manganese oxides nanomaterials with various polymorphs [68]. As a novel Mn3+-Mn4+ mixed valence system, hollandite-type compounds with chemical formula A x Mn8O16 (A = K, Rb, Ba, or Pb, etc. and x ≤ 2) have been enthusiastically pursued for their applications in fast ionic conductors, solid state electrolytes, oxidation catalysts, and stable host materials for radioactive ions from nuclear wastes [912]. The crystal structure of the hollandite-type material is very porous, including 1D 2 × 2 tunnels among rigid MnO2 framework composed of edge-shared MnO6 octahedra [4, 10, 13]. The A ions occupy in the tunnels as guest cations and they are easily replaced by other ions [13]. Due to the special crystal structure and the mixed valence properties of Mn, these compounds show interesting magnetic and electric properties [1316]. The formation of KxMn8O16 with hollandite-type structure is very easy, since the K+ cation is of the ideal dimension to fit in the 2 × 2 tunnels. But the Na+ cation is on the small side to stabilize the 2 × 2 tunnels, thus hollandite Na-Mn-O compound is hard to be obtained [3]. Na2- x Mn8O16 is known to have hollandite structure with unit-cell parameters a = 9.91 Å, b = 2.86 Å, c = 9.62 Å and β = 90.93° (JCPDS No. 42-1347), and the ion tunnel of which is along b-axis. To the best of our knowledge little information about this compound has been reported. Here, we report the synthesis of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods by a very simple molten salt method for the first time.

Exchange bias (EB) effect is observed in the materials with good ferromagnetic (FM)/antiferromagnetic (AFM) interface, such as Ni80Fe20/Ir20Mn80 system [17]. The EB effect originates from the interfacial interaction between FM and AFM materials [18]. Recently, it was reported that 1D pure phase AFM nanomaterials exhibited EB effect at low temperatures, such as Co3O4 nanorods [19], SrMn3O6-δ nanobelts [20], CuO nanowires [21]. Since there is no FM layer in those materials, the EB effect in pure 1D AFM nanomaterials is probably related to the surface layer of the nanomaterials, which is due to the changes in the atomic coordination form a layer of disordered spins (i. e. spin glass layer) [18]. As a kind of 1D magnetic nanomaterials, the Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods may show novel magnetic properties. Thus the magnetic properties of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods are explored and we find that the as-synthesized nanorods exhibit spin glass behavior and EB effect at low temperatures.

Results and discussion

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods is shown in Figure 1. The peaks can be indexed to monoclinic phase of Na2- x Mn8O16 (JCPDS No. 42-1347). No secondary phase is observed, indicating pure phase Na2- x Mn8O16 was obtained. As the Na+ cation is on the small side to stabilize the 2 × 2 tunnels compared with K+ cation, it is difficult to synthesize Na2- x Mn8O16 [3]. In fact, we have tried to synthesize Na2- x Mn8O16 by solid state reaction using stoichiometric amount of NaNO3 and MnCO3 as starting materials (suppose x = 0 in the formula Na2- x Mn8O16), but no Na2- x Mn8O16 phase could be obtained. In order to keep the 2 × 2 tunnel structure stable when K+ cations are replaced by Na+ cations, more Na+ cations are needed. In the high-temperature liquid molten salt, there is a large quantity of free Na+ cations. Suppose the unstable 2 × 2 tunnels formed in the molten salt first, then the Na+ cations can go into the tunnels. The excess of Na+ cations can guarantee there are enough Na+ cations in the 2 × 2 tunnels to make the tunnels stable. Based on the above discussion, the x in Na x Mn8O16 should be larger than that in K x Mn8O16. The x in K x Mn8O16 is 1.5 [14], while the x in Na x Mn8O16 obtained from the EDS result discussed later in this letter is 1.74, which confirms the above conclusion.
Figure 1

XRD pattern of Na 2-x Mn 8 O 16 nanorods at room temperature.

A low-magnified scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods is shown in Figure 2a. From the SEM image, it can be found that large quantity of nanorods was obtained. The average diameter of the nanorods is about 200 nm from the high-magnified SEM image as shown in Figure 2b. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image shown in Figure 2c indicates that the product mainly consists of solid-rod-like structures and the average diameter of the nanorods is about 200 nm, consisting with the SEM results. The TEM image of a single nanorod is shown in Figure 2d. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image taken from a part of the single nanorod is shown in Figure 2e. Clear lattice fringes in Figure 2e indicate a high crystallinity of the nanorod. The lattice spacings of 0.481 and 0.274 nm are recognized and ascribed to the (002) and (011) (or (01-1)) planes of the monoclinic phase of Na2- x Mn8O16, respectively. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern taken from the same nanorod can be indexed to the reflections of the monoclinic phase of Na2-xMn8O16 as shown in the inset of Figure 2e. The clear diffraction spots indicate the high crystallinity of the nanorod, which is consistent with HRTEM result. Combing the HRTEM and SAED results, it can be concluded that the growth direction of the nanorod is along [010], which is the tunnel direction of the compound. The composition of the as-synthesized nanorods was determined by EDS. Figure 2f shows the EDS spectroscopy. The chemical components of the nanorods are Na, Mn, and O with the ratio 7.24:33.38:59.38. The ratio of O/Mn is close to 2, which is consistent with the chemical formula. The chemical formula calculated from the EDS result is Na1.74Mn8O16.
Figure 2

SEM and TEM images. (a) Low-magnification SEM image of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods; (b) high-magnification SEM image of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods; (c) TEM image of Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods; (d) TEM image of a single Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorod; (e) HRTEM image of the Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorod, the inset of (e) is the corresponding SAED pattern of the nanorod. (f) EDS spectrum of the Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods. C peak originates from conductive adhesive, Cu peak originates from Cu sheet, and Pt peaks originate from sputtered Pt layer. (a) scale bar 10 μm, (b) scale bar 5 μm, (c) (d) scale bar 500 nm, (e) 5 nm

The magnetic properties of the Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods were explored. Figure 3 shows the temperature-dependent magnetization curves of the nanorods in zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) processes with an applied magnetic field of 500 Oe. The ZFC magnetization curve shows a sharp peak near 19 K (T B) and an evident separation from the FC curve below T B, suggesting a spin-glass-like behavior at low temperatures [16, 1921]. Such behavior can be attributed to uncompensated surface spins in the 1D nanostructures [16, 1921]. The linear fit for the temperature dependence of the inverse magnetization shows that the product exhibits Curie-Weiss behavior above about 90 K and gives an extrapolated Curie-Weiss temperature (θ) of about -440 K as shown in the inset of Figure 3. The large negative Curie-Weiss temperature indicates the AFM interactions in Na2- x Mn8O16 are very strong.
Figure 3

Temperature dependence of magnetization of Na 2- x Mn 8 O 16 nanorods for ZFC and FC measurements under a magnetic field of 500 Oe. The inset shows the inverse magnetization versus temperature. Solid line represents linear fit between 90 and 300 K.

Hysteresis loops of the Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods recorded at 5 K under ZFC and FC conditions are shown in Figure 4a, and 4b, respectively. For the FC loop, the sample was cooled from room temperature under an applied magnetic field of 5 T. As can be seen in Figure 4a the hysteresis loop recorded under ZFC conditions is symmetrical, centers about the origin, and exhibits a coercive field of about 980 Oe. On the contrary, for the FC process an asymmetry magnetic hysteresis loop (Figure 4b) exhibiting shifts both in the field and magnetization axes as well as an enhanced coercivity (approximately 1,375 Oe) is observed, which indicates the existence of EB phenomenon. The EB effect can be explained on the basis of a phenomenological core-shell model where the core shows AFM behavior and the surrounding shell possesses a net magnetic moment due to a large number of uncompensated surface spins [1921]. This is different from ordinary case, where a good AFM/FM interface is needed, such as Ni80Fe20/Ir20Mn80 system [17]. The shift to positive magnetization axis for the FC loop suggests the presence of a unidirectional exchange anisotropy interaction, which drives the FM domains back to the original orientation when the field is removed [20, 21]. The strength of this anisotropy is measured by the EB field H E which is defined as H E = -(H 1 + H 2)/2, where H 1 and H 2 are left and right coercive fields, respectively. The EB field for the FC process is about 770 Oe. The remanence asymmetry M E is defined as the vertical axis equivalent to H E. Thus the M E and remanent magnetization M r under the FC mode are about 0.071 and 0.126 emu/g, respectively. The enhanced coercivity for the FC loop is ascribed to the development of the exchange anisotropy. In the case of an AFM with small anisotropy, when the FM rotates it drags the AFM spins irreversibly, hence increasing the FM coercivity [18].
Figure 4

Magnetization as a function of magnetic field at 5 K for Na 2-x Mn 8 O 16 nanorods. (a) after ZFC process; (b) after FC process with an applied magnetic field of 5 T. The inset in the lower right corner of (a) and (b) shows the magnified part of the corresponding loop in the low field ranges. The inset in the upper left corner of (b) shows the high field irreversibility of magnetization on the right-hand side.

The spin-glass-like behavior of the surface can also be clearly observed for the opening in the upper right side of the FC hysteresis loop, which is shown in the upper left inset of Figure 4b. This indicates that we have a loss of magnetization during one hysteresis cycle. A similar phenomenon has been observed in Co3O4 nanowires [19]. This striking experimental feature is observed here because of the large amount of measured material and due to the absence of additional ferromagnetic materials which could mask the observation of the interfacial spins behavior [19]. The EB effect induced by surface effects of the nanorods suggests that Na2- x Mn8O16 nanorods may find potential application in multifunctional spintronic devices [22].


In summary, single-crystalline Na2-xMn8O16 nanorods were synthesized by a simple molten salt method for the first time. SEM and TEM images show that the nanorods are about 200 nm in width and several micrometers in length. HRTEM and SAED indicate the single-crystalline of the nanorods. The growth direction of the nanorods is along the tunnel direction of the hollandite structure. The chemical formula of the nanorods can be written as Na1.74Mn8O16 calculated from EDS result. Magnetic measurements indicate that the nanorods show spin glass behavior and EB effect at low temperatures. The low-temperature magnetic behaviors can be explained by the uncompensated surface spins of the nanorods.


In a typical procedure, MnCl2•4H2O and NaOH (1:2 in molar) were dissolved in distilled water, respectively. Then NaOH aqueous solution was added to MnCl2 aqueous solution slowly with constant magnetic stirring. The precipitation was filtered and washed several times and then dried at 90°C for 24 h. After being dried, black powder was obtained. 0.1 g of the obtained black powder was mixed with 5 g NaNO3 and ground for 20 min in an agate mortar by hand. The mixture was then placed in a corundum crucible and annealed at 550°C for 6 h. The product was collected after naturally cooling the furnace to room temperature and then washed several times with distilled water to remove residual NaNO3. The obtained black powder was dried at 90°C for 24 h.

XRD patterns were collected using a Philips X'Pert diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation at room temperature. For the SEM characterization, the product was pasted on a Cu sheet with conductive adhesive. A thin layer of Pt was sputtered on the sample to enhance its conductivity for the facility of SEM measurements. SEM and EDS pattern were carried out in a Hitachi-S-3400N II instrument. In further characterization, TEM images, HRTEM images, and SAED were obtained in a Philips Tecnai F20 instrument, operating at 200 kV. Magnetic properties were obtained in a superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer.



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (10774068), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (07-0430) and National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB929501).

Authors’ Affiliations

Nanjing National Laboratory of Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University
Department of Physics, Hohai University
College of Physics and Electronic Information, Luoyang Normal College


  1. Xia YN, Yang PD, Sun YG, Wu YY, Mayers B, Gates B, Yin YD, Kim F, Yan HQ: One-dimensional nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv Mater 2003, 15: 353–389. 10.1002/adma.200390087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lu W, Lieber CM: Semiconductor nanowires. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2006, 39: R387-R406. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/21/R01View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock SL, Duan NG, Tian ZR, Giraldo O, Zhou H, Suib SL: A review of porous manganese oxide materials. Chem Mater 1998, 10: 2619–2628. 10.1021/cm980227hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng Q, Kanoh H, Ooi K: Manganese oxide porous crystals. J Mater Chem 1999, 9: 319–333. 10.1039/a805369cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosono E, Kudo T, Honma I, Matsuda H, Zhou HS: Synthesis of single crystalline spinel LiMn 2 O 4 nanowires for a lithium ion battery with high power density. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 1045–1051. 10.1021/nl803394vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang X, Li YD: Selected-control hydrothermal synthesis of α- and β-MnO 2 single crystal nanowires. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124: 2880–2881. 10.1021/ja0177105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li WN, Yuan JK, Gomez-Mower S, Sithambaram S, Suib SL: Synthesis of single crystal manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieve (OMS) nanostructures with tunable tunnels and sharps. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 3066–3070. 10.1021/jp0553380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuratani K, Tatsumi K, Kuriyama N: Manganese oxide nanorod with 2 × 4 tunnel structure: synthesis and electrochemical properties. Cryt Growth Des 2007, 7: 1375–1377. 10.1021/cg070206cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mcgeehin P, Hooper A: Fast ion conduction materials. J Mater Sci 1977, 12: 1–27. 10.1007/BF00738467View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Clearfield A: Role of ion exchange in solid-state chemisty. Chem Rev 1988, 88: 125–148. 10.1021/cr00083a007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbato S, Gautier JL: Hollandite cathodes for lithium ion batteries. 2. Thermodynamic and kinetics studies of lithium insertion into BaMMn 7 O 16 (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Ni). Electrochim Acta 2001, 46: 2767–2776. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00506-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ringwood AE, Kesson SE, Ware NG, Hibberson W, Major A: Immobilisation of high level nuclear reactor wastes in SYNROC. Nature 1979, 278: 219–223. 10.1038/278219a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sato H, Enoki T, Yamaura JI, Yamamoto N: Charge localization and successive magnetic phase transitions of mixed-valence manganese oxides K 1.5 (H 3 O) x Mn 8 O 16 (0 < × < 0.5). Phys Rev B 1999, 59: 12836–12841. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12836View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sato H, Yamaura JI, Enoki T, Yamamoto N: Magnetism and electron transport phenomena of manganese oxide ion exchanger with tunnel structure. J Alloys Compd 1997, 262: 443–449. 10.1016/S0925-8388(97)00351-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishiwata S, Bos JWG, Huang Q, Cava RJ: Structure and magnetic properties of hollandite Ba 1.2 Mn 8 O 16 . J Phys: Condens Matter 2006, 18: 3747–3752. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/15/019Google Scholar
  16. Yu JY, Tang SL, Wang L, Du YW: Spin-glass-like behaviour in hollandite Ba 1+δ Mn 8 O 16 nanoribbons synthesized by molten-salt method. Chem Phys Lett 2010, 496: 117–121. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.07.029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen YT: The Effect of Interface Texture on Exchange Biasing in Ni 80 Fe 20 /Ir 20 Mn 80 System. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4: 90–93. 10.1007/s11671-008-9207-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nogués J, Schuller IK: Exchange bias. J Magn Magn Mater 1999, 192: 203–232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Salabas EL, Rumplecker A, Kleitz F, Radu F, Schüth F: Exchange anisotropy in nanocasted Co 3 O 4 nanowires. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 2977–2981. 10.1021/nl060528nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu JY, Tang SL, Zhang XK, Zhai L, Shi YG, Deng Y, Du YW: Synthesis and exchange bias effect of single-crystalline SrMn 3 O 6-δ nanoribbons. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 182506. 10.1063/1.3132056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Díaz-Guerra C, Vila M, Piqueras J: Exchange bias in single-crystalline CuO nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 193105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu JY, Tang SL, Zhai L, Deng Y, Shi YG, Zhang XK, Du YW: Impact of postgrowth annealing on spin-glass ordering and exchange bias in SrMn 3 O 6-δ nanoribbons. J Appl Phys 2009, 106: 093909. 10.1063/1.3256118View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Lan et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.