Open Access

Temperature- and thickness-dependent elastic moduli of polymer thin films

Nanoscale Research Letters20116:243

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-243

Received: 24 September 2010

Accepted: 22 March 2011

Published: 22 March 2011


The mechanical properties of polymer ultrathin films are usually different from those of their counterparts in bulk. Understanding the effect of thickness on the mechanical properties of these films is crucial for their applications. However, it is a great challenge to measure their elastic modulus experimentally with in situ heating. In this study, a thermodynamic model for temperature- (T) and thickness (h)-dependent elastic moduli of polymer thin films E f(T,h) is developed with verification by the reported experimental data on polystyrene (PS) thin films. For the PS thin films on a passivated substrate, E f(T,h) decreases with the decreasing film thickness, when h is less than 60 nm at ambient temperature. However, the onset thickness (h*), at which thickness E f(T,h) deviates from the bulk value, can be modulated by T. h* becomes larger at higher T because of the depression of the quenching depth, which determines the thickness of the surface layer δ.


As devices are being developed with a view towards making them smaller, thinner and lighter in dimension, thin polymer films are found to be in more stringent demand in various applications, such as diffusion barriers, dielectric coatings, electronic packing, and so on [1]. Therefore, understanding the elastic modulus in confined geometries, such as in thin films, is critical to the stability of the structures of the actual devices. A growing demand exists for the determination of the mechanical properties of thin films and coatings at a rapid pace. Recent researches primarily focusing on the confinement effect of the glass-transition temperature T g in thin films [27], have presented inconsistent results. It is believed that such a phenomenon might be attributed to the surface and interfacial effects. However, despite its technological importance, the corresponding elastic modulus of the confined thin polymer films has yet to be fully characterized to the same extent as T g effects have been done.

Direct experimental measures of the ultrathin material modulus have proven to be difficult since the presence of stiff substrate tends to interfere with the measurements [8]. With regard to the impact of confinement on the elastic modulus of soft materials, there is no agreement. This occurrence was caused by the various measurement strategies [9], similar to the initial polymer thin film T g measurements [4, 6]. The different trends of the elastic modulus are due to the different interfacial interactions between probe and the polymer surface. Thus, noncontact mechanics measurement, which does not disturb the free surface, appears to be potentially advantageous for determining the modulus of polymer films. Recently, a wrinkle-based metrology was developed to measure the elastic properties of thin polymer films [10]. In surface wrinkling measurements, to determine the modulus of thin polymer films, a wrinkling instability is utilized to induce compression of a stiff film bonded to a compliant substrate. The film modulus E f is determined based on the formula relating the substrate modulus E sub, the film thickness h, and the wrinkling wavelength λ: . At room temperature, the deduced elastic modulus of the films decreases with decreasing film thickness for ultrathin polymer films (thickness less than 30 nm) [11]. In order to understand better the physical nature of the thickness dependence of the deduced elastic modulus in ultrathin films, a bilayer model was proposed to account for the surface effect on the wrinkling associated with the surface of a soft layer [12].

In the most recent research, the elastic moduli of a series of poly(methacrylate) films with widely varying bulk glass-transition temperature (T gb) as function of thickness at ambient temperature were measured by wrinkle-based metrology. A decrease of the modulus was found in all ultrathin polymers films (< 30 nm) with the onset of confinement effects shifting to larger film thicknesses as the quench depth into glass state (T gb - T) decreases, where T is the measured temperature [8]. In other words, the quench depth affects the extent of the size dependence. To have a better clarification of the quench-depth effect on the elastic modulus of thin polymer films and the nature of the glass transition of polymers, T was considered as a variant to obtain the temperature-dependent elastic modulus of thin films. However, the in situ heating of a polymer-substrate system covering all the processing and characterization steps is impractical [8]. Therefore, in this study, a model will be developed to investigate the temperature- and thickness-dependent elastic moduli of thin polymer films based on both the bilayer and the size-dependent glass-transition temperature thermodynamic models. The results of this new proposed model are then verified with experimental data that were obtained by wrinkle-based metrology for thin polystyrene (PS) films with different molar weights (M w).

Theoretical model

It is well known that the atomic or the molecular structure on a surface is different from the bulk structure in solids. As a result, many materials' properties (e.g., mass density, electrical conductivity, elastic modulus, etc.) on the surface differ from their bulk counterparts. Such a difference is negligible for large-scaled structures. For nanostructures, however, the surface-to-volume ratio is large, and the surface effects can be significant. For thin polymer films of interest in this study, one may assume that a surface layer exists with different elastic moduli. The thickness of the surface layer δ may vary from say one atomic layer for crystalline materials [1315] to a few nanometers for polymers [16, 17]. In the surface layer, lesser density, larger mobility, and softening were found for polymer films [5, 17, 18]. Therefore, a bilayer model was proposed to describe the elastic modulus of thin polymer films E f [12]. In brief, the model consists of a polymer film with thickness h, containing two distinct moduli. The surface layer of the film has a modulus E sur and a finite depth of δ underneath the atmosphere/solid interface. This depth was considered to be independent of the film thickness. The remainder of the film (h-δ) exhibits a bulk-like modulus (E bulk). The bilayer model can be written as [12]
E sur was considered a few orders of magnitude smaller than the corresponding E bulk [11, 12]. On the other hand, it is known that temperature influences the elastic properties of solids [13, 19]. In general, the elastic moduli of solids would decrease at high temperature due to the weakening of the interactions between atoms or molecules induced by the thermo-expansion of solids [14]. However, Equation 1 ignores the temperature effect, although the mechanical properties of amorphous polymers are slightly influenced by temperature in the glass region. The mechanical properties would change significantly as the temperature approaches the T g [20]. In addition, the bilayer model considered that δ is independent of h. However, computer simulations have found that a thinner polymer film has a thicker surface soft layer at a given temperature, and the soft layer would extend to almost the whole film at T g [20]. Recent research has shown that the following relationship exists for bulk polymers: [8]. Thus, δ is related to the quench depth (T gb - T). In the nanometer-scale range, the relationship is considered to be still valid since polymer films and corresponding bulk polymer have similar thermodynamic behaviors [18, 20]. In addition, simulations have noted that near T g the thickness of the free surface layer can nearly extend throughout the thin film [20]. Therefore,
The glass-transition temperature of thin polymer films T g(h) is also dependent on the thickness [27]. Therefore, after considering temperature effects for T < T g(h), the bilayer model can be modified as
It is noted that the temperature effect on the film thickness is ignored in Equation 3 as the thermal expansion is relatively small compared with the thickness variation here. In this case, T g(h) can be determined by [4, 5]

where h 0 = 2c ξ, with ξ being the correlation length for the intermolecular cooperative rearrangement; c is a parameter related with the surface and interface: c = 1 for free-standing thin films or supported thin film with strong interaction between the polymer and the substrate, such as hydrogen bonding; and c = 1/2 for a supported thin film with weak interaction between the polymer and the substrate, such as van der Waals force, which is equivalent to the disappearance of the interface. αs = [2ΔC pb/3R]+1, where R is the ideal gas constant, and ΔC pb is the heat-capacity difference between the bulk glass and the bulk liquid at T gb. αi = αs E s/E i with E s and E i being the bond strength at the surface and interface, respectively.

Results and discussion

The theoretical model was applied to the PS thin films to verify the newly developed temperature- and thickness-dependent elastic modulus model. First, E bulk(T) and T g(h) should be determined for the PS films. It is known that the elastic properties decrease almost linearly in the glass state. They present a very strong temperature-dependent behavior near T g [8, 19]. In addition, generally the glass transition occurs from T g-50 K for bulk polymers. Therefore, E bulk(T) for bulk PS at T < T g-50 K is a linear function, which can be deduced from the experimental data obtained from E bulk(T) = -0.00189T + 4.558 [19]. The result is also in agreement with another experimental result where the elastic modulus of bulk PS, E bulk = 4.0 GPa at T = 294 ± 3 K [12]. E sur was considered much smaller than the corresponding E bulk; it is about 0.1 GPa for PS [12].

Figure 1 shows the thickness dependence of the elastic modulus of PS thin films at T = 295 K that was obtained from Equation 3 using expression (4). The parameters needed for the PS thin films are given in the caption of Figure 1. In this figure, our results are compared with the corresponding experimental results for two different molar weights. These results are well in agreement with each other. The modulus for thick films (> 100 nm) was found to be independent of the film thickness, whereas the elastic modulus decreases with the film thickness when the thickness is less than 60 nm. A similar thickness-dependent behavior was also found for several other polymer films, such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA), and poly(isobutyl methacrylate) PiBMA [8, 11]. The depression of the elastic modulus for thin films is a consequence of the soft surface layer, whose relative importance increases as the surface-to-volume ratio increases.
Figure 1

The thickness-dependent elastic modulus of PS thin films at T = 295 K. The symbols circle and square are the experiment results for molar weight M w = 1800 and 114 kg/mol, respectively [12]. The solid curve is plotted with the calculation results obtained from Equation 3, where the parameters that determine the T g(h) in Equation 4 are c = 1/2, h 0 = 5 nm, ΔC pb = 30.7 J mol-1 K-1 = 1.919 J g atom-1 K-1, and T gb = 375 K [4].

Using Equation 3, the temperature dependence of elastic modulus of PS thin films with h = 10, 30, and 100 nm and bulk are shown in Figure 2. It is noted that the elastic modulus decreases as T increases for all the films. At low temperatures, there is a nearly linear relationship between the elastic modulus and temperature. However, the elastic modulus decreases steeply at the onset of approximately 210, 300, and 350 K for 10, 30, and 100 nm PS thin films, respectively, while the glass-transition temperatures are 275, 347, and 368 K for 10, 30, and 100 nm, respectively, based on Equation 4. The differences between the onset point and T g are 65, 47, and 18 K, respectively, for the films of three different thicknesses, which imply that the modulus decreases greatly in the glass-transition temperature region, and this region is more extended as the thickness decreases, consistent with the available experimental data in published literatures [19, 21, 22].
Figure 2

The temperature-dependent elastic modulus of PS thin films with h = 10, 30, and 100 nm and bulk obtained from Equation 3.

Most recently, the deviation of the elastic modulus from its bulk value was studied for thin glassy polymer films with different glass-transition temperatures at ambient temperature. These results suggested that the deviations are significantly influenced by the quench depth into the glass (T gb - T) [8]. To induce the different quench depths, the temperature T is varied in this study. Figure 3 plots the thickness-dependent elastic moduli of PS thin films at different temperatures. For clearly demonstrating the size effect, a relative value of E(T,h)/E(T,∞) is taken as the ordinate in the figure. From Figure 3, it is found that the size effect is more significant at high temperatures. Recent research has reported that the elastic modulus and glass-transition temperature deviate from the corresponding bulk values at the same thicknesses for poly(n-propyl methacrylate) (PnPMA) thin film on poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) substrate [8]. In Figure 3, T g(h)/T gb for PS thin films on a passivated substrate is shown by the dashed curve, which is obtained by Equation 4. We find that the functions T g(h)/T gb and E f(150,h)/E(150,∞) behave in a similar manner as a function of h. Also, the thicknesses at which the two functions deviate from the corresponding bulk values are almost the same, as in the case of the PnPMA/PDMS system. Considering a criterion that the deviation of the modulus starts when E(T,h)/E(T,∞) ≈ 0.96, the critical film thickness h*, at which the deviation starts for different temperature, is shown in Figure 4. Note that h* increases as T increases. In other words, at high temperatures, the size effect is more important, and it can be tuned by the application temperature. Therefore, in actual applications, to avoid decreasing the strength of thin films, one should make sure that the film thickness is larger than h* for a given temperature. The temperature dependence of h* is the consequence of the depression of quench depth when the temperature is near the glass-transition region.
Figure 3

The thickness-dependent elastic modulus of PS thin films at different temperatures. The inset enlarges the encircled region to show the good match of T g(h)/T gb and E f(T,h)/E f(T,∞).
Figure 4

The onset thickness h * of PS films on the passivated substrate at different temperatures.

The effect of the application temperature on the elastic modulus of thin polymer films is seen from the plots of Figure 5, showing the ratio δ/h* as a function of temperature. It is noted that this ratio is almost a constant, i.e., approximately 0.004. It is known that the size effect is determined by δ/h, where δ is usually considered as independent of h at a given temperature [8, 12]. However, Figure 6 shows the surface thickness of PS films of different thicknesses at 295 K as obtained from Equation 2. Thus, δ depends on h and increases as h decreases. According to Equation 2, it is known that δ is related to T g(h), which is dependent on size and can be determined by Equation 4. In the case of PS films on the passivated substrate, such as on PDMS, where there is no strong interaction between the polymer films and the substrate, T g(h) decreases with decreasing h. Therefore, δ(h) increases as h decreases due to the depression of T g(h) at a given temperature. On the other hand, the mobility of the polymer film surface layer can be experimentally investigated by nanoparticle embedding [17, 23] and fluorescence methods [7]. Both methods reported that the surface layer has a thickness of several nanometers, which is consistent with the result of Figure 6.
Figure 5

The ratio δ/ h * as a function of temperature.
Figure 6

Thickness dependence of the surface layer δ(295 K, h ) of PS thin films.


A theoretical model for the temperature- and thickness-dependent elastic modulus E f(T,h) was established for amorphous polymer thin films to investigate the dominance of this mechanical property of PS films at nanometer scale. We found that at ambient temperature, E f(T,h) of PS thin films on the passivated substrate decreases as h decreases when h is thinner than 60 nm, while E f(T,h) is nearly independent on h for h > 60 nm. Furthermore, a significant thickness effect can be induced by the temperature. The onset of thickness, at which E f(T,h) deviates from the bulk value, is dependent on temperature and is larger at high temperature. At a certain temperature, E f(T,h) exhibits the same size-dependent trend as T g(h), which is associated with the quench depth of T g(h) - T. Except for the temperature effect, the thickness of the surface layer also depends on h, and it increases as h decreases due to the size-dependent glass-transition temperature T g(h). Therefore, E f(T,h) of the thin films can be determined using the developed model, thus providing references for the applications of polymer thin films.





poly(ethyl methacrylate)


poly(isobutyl methacrylate)




poly(methyl methacrylate)

and PnPMA: 

poly(n-propyl methacrylate).



This study was supported by the Vice-Chancellor's Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program of the University of New South Wales (SIR50/PS19184), the ECR grant of the University of New South Wales (SIR30/PS24201), and the Australian Research Council Discovery Programs DP1096769.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales


  1. Elshabini-Riad AAR, Barlow FD: Thin Film Technology Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Keddie JE, Jones RAL, Cory RA: Size-dependent depression of the glass transition temperature in polymer films. Europhys Lett 1994, 27: 59–64. 10.1209/0295-5075/27/1/011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Forrest JA, Dalnoki VK: The glass transition in thin polymer films. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2001, 94: 167–195. 10.1016/S0001-8686(01)00060-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiang Q, Lang XY: Glass transition of low-dimensional polystyrene. Macromol Rapid Commun 2004, 25: 825–828. 10.1002/marc.200300274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ao ZM, Jiang Q: Size effects on miscibility and glass transition temperature of binary polymer blend films. Langmuir 2006, 22: 1241–1246. 10.1021/la0516779View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Alcoutlabi M, McKenna GB: Effects of confinement on material behavior at the nanometer size scale. J Phys Condens Matter 2005, 17: R461-R524. 10.1088/0953-8984/17/15/R01View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison CJ, Torkelson JM: The distribution of glass-transition temperatures in nanoscopically confined glass formers. Nat Mater 2003, 2: 659–700. 10.1038/nmat980View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Torres JM, Stafford CM, Vogt BD: Elastic modulus of amorphous polymer thin filmes: Relationship to the glass transition temperature. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 2677–2685. 10.1021/nn9006847View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Forrest JA, Dalnoki-Veress K, Dutcher JR: Brillouin light scattering studies of the mechanical properties of thin freely standing polystyrene films. Phys Phys E 1998, 58: 6109–6114.Google Scholar
  10. Stafford CM, Harrison C, Beers KL, Karim AK, Amis EJ, Vanlandingham MR, Kim H-C, Volksen W, Miller RD, Simonyi EE: A buckling-based metrology for measuring the elastic moduli of polymeric thin films. Nat Mater 2004, 3: 545–550. 10.1038/nmat1175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Stafford CM, Vogt BD, Harrison C, Julhongpiput D, Huang R: Elastic moduli of ultrathin amorphous polymer films. Macromolecules 2006, 39: 5095–5099. 10.1021/ma060790iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang R, Stafford CM, Vogt BD: Effect of surface properties on wrinkling of ultrathin films. J Aerospace Eng 2007, 20: 38–44. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(38)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ao ZM, Li S, Jiang Q: The determination of Young's modulus in noble metal nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 081905. 10.1063/1.2976134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sun CQ: Size dependence of nanostructures: impact of bond order deficiency. Prog Solid State Chem 2007, 35: 1–159. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2006.03.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ouyang G, Li XL, Tan X, Yang GW: Size-induced strain and stiffness of nanocrystals. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 031904. 10.1063/1.2221897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mansfield KF, Theodorou DN: Molecular dynamics simulation of a glassy polymer surface. Macromolecules 1991, 24: 6283–6294. 10.1021/ma00023a034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fakhraai Z, Forrest JA: Measuring the surface dynamics of glassy polymers. Science 2008, 319: 600–604. 10.1126/science.1151205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bohme TR, de Pablo JJ: Evidence for size-dependent mechanical properties from simulations of nanoscopic polymeric structures. J Chem Phys 2002, 116: 9939–9951. 10.1063/1.1476315View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukuhara M: Temperature dependency of elastic moduli and internal dilational and shear frictions of polyetherimide. J Appl Polym Sci 2003, 90: 759–764. 10.1002/app.12717View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yoshimoto K, Jain T, Nealey PF, de Pablo JJ: Local dynamic mechanical properties in model free-standing polymer thin films. J Chem Phys 2005, 122: 144712. 10.1063/1.1873732View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ao ZM, Zheng WT, Jiang Q: Lindemann-like size-independent glass-transition criterion for polymers. Polymer 2008, 49: 3578–3581. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tran TA, Saïd S, Grohens Y: Nanoscale characteristic length at the glass transition in confined syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate). Macromolecules 2005, 38: 3867–3871. 10.1021/ma0487296View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ilton M, Qi D, Forrest JA: Using nanoparticle embedding to probe surface rheology and the length scale of surface mobility in glassy polymers. Macromolecules 2009, 42: 6851–6854. 10.1021/ma901057bView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Ao and Li; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.