Open Access

Selective area epitaxy of ultra-high density InGaN quantum dots by diblock copolymer lithography

  • Guangyu Liu1Email author,
  • Hongping Zhao1,
  • Jing Zhang1,
  • Joo Hyung Park2,
  • Luke J Mawst2 and
  • Nelson Tansu1
Nanoscale Research Letters20116:342

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-342

Received: 3 November 2010

Accepted: 15 April 2011

Published: 15 April 2011


Highly uniform InGaN-based quantum dots (QDs) grown on a nanopatterned dielectric layer defined by self-assembled diblock copolymer were performed by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. The cylindrical-shaped nanopatterns were created on SiN x layers deposited on a GaN template, which provided the nanopatterning for the epitaxy of ultra-high density QD with uniform size and distribution. Scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy measurements were conducted to investigate the QDs morphology. The InGaN/GaN QDs with density up to 8 × 1010 cm-2 are realized, which represents ultra-high dot density for highly uniform and well-controlled, nitride-based QDs, with QD diameter of approximately 22-25 nm. The photoluminescence (PL) studies indicated the importance of NH3 annealing and GaN spacer layer growth for improving the PL intensity of the SiN x -treated GaN surface, to achieve high optical-quality QDs applicable for photonics devices.


Nitride-based semiconductor devices have tremendous applications in solid-state lighting [19], lasers [1014], photovoltaic [1517], thermoelectricity [1820], and terahertz photonics [21, 22]. Nitride-based InGaN quantum wells (QWs) are typically employed as active regions in energy-efficient and reliable light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for solid-state lighting. However, the large spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization fields in III-Nitride material lead to a significant charge separation effect [2335], which in turn results in low internal quantum efficiency of green-emitting nitride-based LEDs, and high threshold current density in nitride lasers. Nonpolar nitrides were employed to remove the polarization field [23]; however, the development of nonpolar InGaN QWs is relatively limited due to high substrate cost and less mature epitaxial techniques. Recent approaches to improve the LED internal quantum efficiency by employing novel InGaN QWs with improved electron-hole wavefunction overlaps have been reported [2435], as follows: (1) InGaN QW with AlGaN δ-layer [24], (2) staggered InGaN QW [2530], (3) type-II QW [31], (4) strain-compensated InGaN-AlGaN QW [32, 33], (5) InGaN-delta-InN QW [34], and (6) InGaN QW with novel AlInN barrier design [35].

The pursuit of quantum dot (QD)-based active regions for optoelectronic and photovoltaic devices is very important because of the stronger quantum effects in the nanostructures [3639]. The three-dimensional potential boundaries deeply localize carriers, and thus the overlap of the electron-hole wavefunctions is greatly enhanced. The strain field from the large lattice mismatch of InGaN/GaN is released in three dimensions for QD nanostructures so that the non-radiative recombination centers and defects can significantly be reduced. Besides, QD design enables high In-content InGaN epitaxy, which enlarges the coverage of emission spectrum and enriches the design of QD-based active region. The QDs can be implemented in intermediate-band solar cells [40, 41] to greatly enhance the efficiency over the whole solar spectrum.

Two conventional approaches for realizing the QD structure include (1) etching technique and (2) self-assembled epitaxy based on Stranski-Kastranow (S-K) growth mode [4250]. The approach to obtain QD by etching techniques suffers from surface roughness and significant surface recombination issues. The S-K growth mode has been employed by both molecular beam epitaxy and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) technique for the epitaxy of nitride-based [4245] and arsenide-based QDs [4648].

The MOCVD epitaxy of the self-assembled InGaN QDs emitting in the 510-520-nm region has been reported in reference [44]. The use of the self-assembled growth technique of InGaN QDs led to QDs with circular base diameter of 40 nm and an average height of 4 nm, and the QD's density was measured as 4 × 109 cm-2. The S-K growth mode of InGaN QDs [4245] resulted in relatively low density range (mid 109 up to high 109 cm-2), nonuniformity in QD distribution, and the existence of wetting layer. In contrast to InGaN-based QDs, S-K growths of In(Ga)As/GaAs QDs [4648] have led to high-performance lasers with high QD density (high 1010 cm-2) and uniform QD distribution.

Another important obstacle preventing one from fully exploring the radiative and gain properties of the QD structure from S-K growth mode is the inherent presence of the wetting layer [3638, 49, 50]. Several recent studies have shown that the strain fields in the wetting layer from the S-K-grown QDs reduces the envelop function overlap and recombination rate in QD's active region [3638]. The wetting layer also serves as a carrier leakage path because of the coupling of wetting-layer states with localized QD states, which leads to the increase of threshold current in laser devices.

To eliminate of the detrimental wetting layer as well as fully control the formation of QDs, an alternative to achieve the growth of arsenide-based and nitride-based QDs devices by utilizing selective area epitaxy (SAE) [5157]. The ideal QDs obtained by the SAE approach [5257], in particular realized by employing diblock copolymer lithography [5557], have comparable QD density to that of S-K growth mode, but potentially have better device performance because of the removal of the wetting layer and better carrier confinement [5557]. Previous studies on the SAE of InGaN QDs have been pursued by using electron-beam lithography [5861], and anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) template [62].

In this study, we present the SAE of ultra-high density and highly uniform InGaN-based QDs on the nano-patterned GaN template realized by diblock copolymer lithography. The diblock copolymer lithography is ideal for device applications due to the adaptability to full wafer scale nanopatterning. All growths were performed by employing MOCVD on GaN templates grown on c-plane sapphire substrates. The distribution and size of QDs are well controlled, and the presence of the wetting layer is eliminated. Our photoluminescence (PL) studies under different template treatments and different growth conditions confirm the effect of SiN x deposition on the GaN template surface, as well as provide possible solutions to enhance luminescence from the QD samples.

It is to be noted that the use of SAE approach on dielectric nanopatterns defined by diblock copolymer process resulted in the growths of InGaN QDs without wetting layer, which potentially led to the increase in optical matrix element. In addition to the improved matrix element in the QD, the use of dielectric layers also serve as current confinement layer resulting in efficient carrier injection directly into the InGaN QDs arrays. The diblock copolymer lithography approach also leads us to very high-density patterning with excellent uniformity and low cost. In contrast, the use of AAO template leads to relatively non-uniform patterning, while the use of e-beam lithography leads to a high-cost approach.

Nanopatterning and SAE of InGaN QDs

The fabrication process consists of nano-template preparation by diblock copolymer lithography and SAE by MOCVD. Figure 1a-f shows the schematics of the fabrication process flow for the SAE-QDs defined by diblock copolymer approach. The growth of 3-μm GaN template on the c-plane sapphire substrate was carried out by employing MOCVD. The growths of the GaN templates were carried out by employing etch-back and recovery process with 30-nm low-temperature buffer layer [1, 7], and the growths of high-temperature GaN layers were carried out at a temperature of 1080°C. Subsequently (Figure 1a), 10 nm SiN x was deposited on the sample by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition and followed by NH3 annealing at a temperature of 800°C for 20 min to increase the adhesion of SiN x on GaN template.
Figure 1

MOCVD process flow of InGaN/GaN QDs SAE with dielectric patterns defined by the self-assembled diblock copolymer.

The sample was then pretreated using PS-r-PMMA brush material followed by the deposition of cylindrical-shaped diblock copolymer PS-b-PMMA (Figure 1b) [5557]. The brush material is made of random copolymer that would lead to non-preferential affinity to the both blocks of the self-organizing PS-b-PMMA copolymer [55], which enabled the formation of the cylindrical morphology on the diblock copolymer layer during the thermal annealing as a result of the microphase separation. After the UV exposure (λ = 254 nm) and chemical etching by acetic acid, the PMMA block was removed, leaving the PS block to form the patterned copolymer that was used as the polymer stencil (Figure 1c). Subsequently, the sample was made to undergo the reactive ion etching by CF4 plasma, and the nanopatterns were transferred from the copolymer layer to the underneath SiN x layer (Figure 1d). After the removal of the copolymer by O2 plasma and wet etching, the SiN x layer with the nanopatterns could serve as the mask in the following MOCVD process (Figure 1e). The details of the diblock copolymer-processing steps (Figure 1b-e) are described in references [55, 56]. The opening region where GaN template was exposed to the metal-organic source would enable the QD growth (Figure 1f). The remaining SiN x layer can also serve as an insulator between QDs within the active region of a device.

Both the n-GaN template and InGaN QD samples used in this study were grown by a vertical-type VEECO P-75 MOCVD reactor. The growths of the InGaN QD-active region and GaN barrier layers employed triethylgallium, trimethylindium, and ammonia (NH3) as gallium, indium, and nitrogen precursors, respectively. The use of trimethlygallium was employed for the growth of n-GaN template (T g = 1080°C). The growth rates for InGaN active and GaN barrier layers in planar region were 3 and 2.4 nm/min, respectively. The growth temperature and growth pressure for the InGaN QDs and GaN barrier layers were kept at 735°C and 200 Torr, respectively. The top GaN barrier layer also serves as the cap layer for the sample, and its similar growth temperature with that of the InGaN QDs leads to minimal dissolution of the In during the barrier layer growth. The V/III molar ratios employed for the growths of the GaN templates, GaN barrier and InGaN active layers were 3900, 34500, and 18500, respectively. Based on growth calibration using XRD measurements, the In-content of the InGaN layer employed in the studies was calibrated as 15%. In our experiments, two sets of structures were investigated as shown in Figure 2, as follows: (1) Sample A consists of 1.5 nm InGaN layer sandwiched between GaN barrier layers each of 1 nm in the opening region with a total thickness designed to be 3.5 nm; and (2) Sample B consists of 3 nm InGaN layer sandwiched between GaN barrier layers of 2 nm each making the total thickness of 7 nm.
Figure 2

Schematic of two groups of QD samples with the structures of: (A) 1.5-nm InGaN sandwiched between 1 GaN layers (Sample A); (B) 3 nm InGaN sandwiched between 2-nm GaN layers (Sample B).

Structural and morphology characterizations

To investigate the surface topographies and QD morphologies, scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi 4300) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Dimension 3000 and Agilent 5500) measurements were performed. Figure 3 shows the SEM image of the copolymer deposited on SiN x layer after undergoing the UV radiation which would result in nanopore openings, before any active region growth. The SEM images shown in Figure 3 are similar to the processing step described in Figure 1c. The diameter of the holes in the copolymer was measured as approximately 20-25 nm, and the arrangement of the copolymer shows 2-D hexagonal-closed packed structure, although without long-range order between grain boundaries.
Figure 3

SEM image of diblock copolymer nanopatterns on SiN x with the hexagonal array of openings after the UV exposure.

Figure 4a,b shows the SEM images of the samples A and B with InGaN/GaN QDs surrounded by the SiN x dielectric layer. The SEM measurements demonstrate the successful growth of InGaN/GaN QDs by SAE with the elimination of wetting layer. The hexagonal arrangement of QD arrays on both samples is in good agreement with the arrangement of the openings on copolymer layer as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 4

SEM images of SAE-grown InGaN/GaN QDs with SiN x layer for both samples investigated: (a) sample A; (b) sample B.

The SEM images of the samples A and B after the removal of SiN x layer by HF wet etching were shown in Figure 5a,b, respectively. The SEM measurements indicate that the QDs on both the samples were comparable in both the size and distribution with QDs before the elimination of the SiN x layer. The QD diameters were estimated to be about 22 and 25 nm on the samples A and B, respectively. The QD densities for the samples A and B were measured as 7 × 10 and 8 × 1010 cm-2, respectively, which happen to be among the highest QD density reported for InGaN material systems.
Figure 5

SEM images of SAE-grown InGaN/GaN QDs after removal of SiNx layer for both samples investigated: (a) sample A; (b) sample B.

Earlier, studies have been carried out to obtain high density nitride-based QDs [63, 64]. Krestnikov et al. [63] reported the QD-like behavior in InGaN QW resulting from the In-clustering effect, and the density of the In-riched nanoisland within the QW layer was estimated to be in the range of 1011-1012 cm-2. The QD-like behavior in InGaN QW from the In-clustering effect resulted in relatively shallow QD/barrier systems. Tu et al. [64] reported the growth of InGaN QDs by employing GaN templates with SiN x treatment which resulted in template roughening, and this process leads to dot density of near 3 × 1011 cm-2 [64]. However, the use of roughening approach leads to QD distribution with relatively non-uniform size distributions. Thus, the use of SAE approach in growing the InGaN QDs enabled them to grow highly uniform QDs with deep QD/barrier systems (i.e., with GaN or other larger bandgap barrier materials) and very high QD density (approx. 8 × 1010 cm-2).

AFM measurements on InGaN/GaN QD samples were carried out after the removal of SiN x layer to provide with direct measurements of QDs morphology. The AFM measurements of the InGaN/GaN (Sample A) were carried out using Dimension 3000, as shown in Figure 6a,b. Figure 6a shows the InGaN/GaN QDs arrays with the scale of 0.5 μm × 0.5 μm, and Figure 6b refers to the height and lateral of the cross-sectional profiles indicated in Figure 6a. The highly uniform QDs were observed from AFM measurements. The dot density was estimated to be 7.5 × 1010 cm-2 with the average height of 1.84 nm and dot diameter of about 25 nm, and these results are in good agreement with those of the nanopatterns employed in the studies. The height and the size of the cross-sectional profiles in Figure 6b indicate that the growth of the dots was well controlled, and the sample exhibits much less variations in dot size, shapes, and distributions compared to those of SK growth mode [44].
Figure 6

AFM measurement using Dimension 3000 for SAE-grown InGaN/GaN QDs arrays on sample A after removal of SiN x : (a) AFM scan with the scale of 0.5 μm × 0.5 μm; (b) the corresponding height and size of the cross-sectional profiles.

For comparison purpose, separate AFM measurements were carried out on sample A by employing Agilent 5500 which consists of higher resolution tip, as shown in Figure 7a,b. Figure 7a shows the AFM image for InGaN/GaN QDs arrays (sample A) with the scale of 0.6 μm × 0.6 μm, and Figure 7b shows the corresponding height and spacing profile for the sample. The QDs were shown to have cylindrical shape, and the QDs density was measured as 7.92 × 1010 cm-2 with average height of 2.5 nm and dot diameter of about 25 nm. The dip-like profile in the QDs could be attributed to different growth rate in the center and outer regions of the QDs, which require further studies to confirm this finding.
Figure 7

AFM measurement using Agilent 5500 for SAE-grown InGaN/GaN QDs arrays on sample A after removal of SiN x : (a) AFM scan with the scale of 0.6 μm × 0.6 μm; (b) the corresponding height and size of the cross-sectional profiles.

The AFM image of the InGaN QDs grown on sample B is also shown in Figure 8 with a scale of 1 μm × 1 μm (Dimension 3000). The density of dots on sample B is measured as 8 × 1010 cm-2 with the dot diameter of 25 nm and average height of 4.1 nm. Note that the larger heights in the AFM measurements of the QDs measured in sample B is in agreement with the thicker growths for sample B.
Figure 8

AFM image of SAE-grown InGaN/GaN QDs on samples B measured by Dimension 3000 after removal of SiN x on 1 μm × 1 μm area.

The diameter of the QDs in our experiments was measured in the range of 22-25 nm, which is considered as relatively large QDs. The focus of the current studies is to investigate the various optimizations in the growth and annealing conditions for the development of the SAE technique for InGaN QDs with diblock copolymer lithography, and the current studies are focused on the dimensions of 20-25-nm diameter QDs. In order to obtain stronger quantum effects in the 3D carrier confinement, the QDs are preferably realized with smaller diameters (10-18 nm) [36]. However, the 3D quantum effect in the carrier confinement still exists in the 20-25-nm QD diameter as discussed in the theoretical works in [36]. Future optimization studies on the investigation of SAE InGaN QDs with smaller QDs diameter are of importance for achieving nanostructures with stronger 3D carrier confinement, and the optimization of this approach is required to achieve active regions with high optical quality for device applications.

PL studies and discussion

The SAE approach enabled the growth of ultra-high density InGaN QDs; however, no strong PL was observed from the InGaN/GaN QD samples. All the PL measurements were carried out by utilization of He-Cd laser with wavelength at 325 nm as the excitation source at room temperature. From our studies, we found that the surface treatment during the SiN x deposition could be the cause for the defect formation in the GaN surface, which results in poor luminescence from the SAE-grown QD samples. The surface treatment processes for the epitaxy of the QDs include SiN x deposition, and HF or CF4 plasma etching. A series of PL studies on the SAE-grown InGaN QDs were performed to identify and further understand the effects of various treatments on the PL of the samples, which will provide guidance in addressing these issues.

To understand the impact of HF etching on the luminescence properties, the PL spectra comparison of InGaN single-QW samples grown on three different types of GaN template are shown in Figure 9. The active regions in all these samples consist of similar structure; 6 nm GaN barrier followed by 2.5 nm InGaN, and then 10 nm GaN cap layer. The comparison samples include the InGaN single QW grown on three templates as follows: (1) GaN template with no surface treatment (as reference sample), (2) GaN template with HF etching only, and (3) GaN template with SiN x deposition and HF wet etching. The data indicate that the HF etching does not lead to any detrimental effect on the InGaN QW grown afterward, while the SiN x deposition process leads to significant detrimental effect on the InGaN QW grown on top of the GaN template as indicated by the significant reduction in the PL intensity.
Figure 9

PL comparison of planar SQW grown on (1) GaN with no surface treatment, (2) GaN with HF wet etching, and (3) GaN with SiN x deposition and HF etching.

To confirm the effect of SiN x deposition on the GaN template surface, PL studies were conducted on two additional types of samples shown in Figure 10, as follows: (1) InGaN QDs grown on nanopatterned GaN template, and (2) planar InGaN QW with the same thickness for InGaN and GaN grown on the GaN templates that had been treated with SiN x deposition and HF wet etching, i.e., the same process employed to form the dielectric mask for selective QD growth. The spectra for both samples were compared to that of the InGaN QW grown on the GaN template with no surface treatment (reference sample), and very poor PL spectra were observed for both samples grown on the templates that had been treated with SiNx deposition and HF wet etching (Figure 10), indicating that the surface modification from the SiN x deposition on GaN template surface is responsible for the poor luminescence.
Figure 10

PL comparison of (1) planar InGaN QW on GaN template that has been treated with SiN x deposition and HF etching, and (2) InGaN QD sample with the same InGaN and GaN layer thickness.

Experiments were carried out to identify possible approaches to address the SiN x surface treatment issue, as illustrated in Figure 11. Different growth conditions were applied to the GaN templates that had been treated with SiN x deposition and HF etching, and the same InGaN QWs (6 nm GaN/2.5 nm InGaN/10 nm GaN) were grown afterwards. The PL spectra from InGaN QW directly grown on GaN template undergoing SiN x deposition and HF etching, without any additional growth treatment are shown in Figure 11 (Direct QW Growth). By annealing the GaN template under NH3 environment at 1070°C for 7 min, the single QW grown on the second sample has almost 40 times enhancement in the peak intensity at 420-nm emission. The third sample consisted of a 7-min GaN regrowth at 1070°C before the single-QW growth, and this sample exhibited additional approximately sevenfold improvement in peak intensity as compared to that of the second sample. The series of PL studies indicate that the GaN regrowth and the NH3 annealing condition before the QD/QW-active region growth could potentially lead to solutions for addressing the defect generated from the SiN x deposition on GaN templates. Future studies will involve the application of these procedures to the selective QD growth. Other future approaches by coupling the SAE InGaN QDs with surface plasmon based structures [65, 66] will be of great interest for enhancing the radiative efficiency in LED devices.
Figure 11

PL enhancement study of SQW with different growth condition treatments.


In summary, the selective area growths of InGaN QDs on dielectric patterns defined by the self-assembled diblock copolymer were carried out by MOCVD. The use of selective area approach resulted in ultra-high QD density of approx. 8 × 1010 cm-2, which represents the highest among the QD densities reported for highly uniform and well-controlled nitride-based QDs. PL studies of InGaN QDs and the QWs show that GaN spacer regrowth as well as annealing conditions can greatly improve the luminescence from QD samples. The availability of highly uniform and ultra-high density InGaN QDs formed by this approach potentially has significant impacts on developing high-efficiency LEDs for solid-state lighting, low threshold current density-visible diode lasers, and intermediate-band nitride-based solar cells.



anodized aluminum oxide


atomic force microscopy


light-emitting diodes


metal-organic chemical vapor deposition




quantum dots


quantum wells


selective area epitaxy


scanning electron microscope.



The authors would like to acknowledge the funding supports received from the US National Science Foundation (ECCS #0701421, ECCS #1028490,DMR # 0907260 ), Class of 1961 Professorship Funds, and through ARO MURI W911NF-05-1-0262 (to Dr. John Prater).

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Optical Technologies, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lehigh University
Reed Center for Photonics, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison


  1. Koleske DD, Fische AJ, Allerman AA, Mitchell CC, Cross KC, Kurtz SR, Figiel JJ, Fullmer KW, Breiland WG: Improved Brightness of 380 nm GaN Light Emitting Diodes Through Intentional Delay of the Nucleation Island Coalescence. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81: 1940. 10.1063/1.1506793View Article
  2. Li X, Bishop SG, Coleman JJ: GaN Epitaxial Lateral Overgrowth and Optical Characterization. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73: 1179. 10.1063/1.122121View Article
  3. Crawford MH: LEDs for Solid-State Lighting: Performance Challenges and Recent Advances. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1028. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2013476View Article
  4. Gardner NF, Muller GO, Shen YC, Chen G, Watanabe S, Gotz W, Krames MR: Blue-emitting InGaN-GaN double-heterostructure light-emitting diodes reaching maximum quantum efficiency above 200 A/cm2. Appl. Phys. Lett 2007, 91: 243506. 10.1063/1.2807272View Article
  5. Ee YK, Kumnorkaew P, Arif RA, Tong H, Zhao H, Gilchrist JF, Tansu N: Optimization of Light Extraction Efficiency of III-Nitride Light Emitting Diodes with Self-Assembled Colloidal-based Microlenses. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1218. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2015580View Article
  6. Ee YK, Kumnorkaew P, Arif RA, Tong H, Gilchrist JF, Tansu N: Light Extraction Efficiency Enhancement of InGaN Quantum Wells Light-Emitting Diodes with Polydimethylsiloxane Concave Microstructures. Opt Express 2009, 17: 13747. 10.1364/OE.17.013747View Article
  7. Jung T, Lee LK, Ku PC: Novel Epitaxial Nanostructures for the Improvement of InGaN LEDs Efficiency. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1073. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2016437View Article
  8. Ee YK, Biser JM, Cao W, Chan HM, Vinci RP, Tansu N: Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy of III-Nitride Light-Emitting Diodes on Nano-Patterned AGOG Sapphire Substrate by Abbreviated Growth Mode. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1066. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2017208View Article
  9. Schubert MF, Xu J, Kim JK, Schubert EF, Kim MH, Yoon S, Lee SM, Sone C, Sakong T, Park Y: Polarization-Matched GaInN/AlGaInN Multi-Quantum-Well Light-Emitting Diodes with Reduced Efficiency Droop. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 041102. 10.1063/1.2963029View Article
  10. Wierer JJ, David A, Megens MM: III-nitride photonic-crystal light-emitting diodes with high extraction efficiency. Nat. Photon 2009, 3: 163. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.21View Article
  11. Rangel E, Matioli E, Choi YS, Weisbuch C, Speck JS, Hu EL: Directionality control through selective excitation of low-order guided modes in thin-film InGaN photonic crystal light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett 2011, 98: 081104. 10.1063/1.3554417View Article
  12. Queren D, Avramescu A, Bruderl G, Breidenassel A, Schillgalies M, Lutgen S, Strauß U: 500 nm Electrically Driven InGaN Based Laser Diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 081119. 10.1063/1.3089573View Article
  13. Zhao H, Tansu N: Optical Gain Characteristics of Staggered InGaN Quantum Well Lasers. J Appl Phys 2010, 107: 113110. 10.1063/1.3407564View Article
  14. Zhang J, Zhao H, Tansu N: Effect of Crystal-field Split-off Hole and Heavy-hole Bands Crossover on Gain Characteristics of High Al-content AlGaN Quantum Well Lasers. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 111105. 10.1063/1.3488825View Article
  15. Neufeld CJ, Toledo NG, Cruz SC, Iza M, DenBaars SP, Mishra UK: High Quantum Efficiency InGaN/GaN Solar Cells with 2.95 eV Band Gap. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 143502. 10.1063/1.2988894View Article
  16. Dahal R, Pantha B, Li J, Lin JY, Jiang HX: InGaN/GaN Multiple Quantum Well Solar Cells with Long Operating Wavelengths. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 063505. 10.1063/1.3081123View Article
  17. Jamil M, Zhao H, Higgins J, Tansu N: MOVPE and Photoluminescence of Narrow Band Gap (0.77 eV) InN on GaN/Sapphire by Pulsed Growth Mode. Phys Status Solidi A 2008, 205: 2886. 10.1002/pssa.200824136View Article
  18. Tong H, Zhang J, Liu G, Herbsommer JA, Huang GS, Tansu N: Thermoelectric Properties of Lattice-Matched AlInN Alloy Grown by Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 112105. 10.1063/1.3489086View Article
  19. Zhang J, Tong H, Liu GY, Herbsommer JA, Huang GS, Tansu N: Characterizations of Seebeck Coefficients and Thermoelectric Figures of Merit for AlInN Alloys with Various In-Contents. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 053706. 10.1063/1.3553880View Article
  20. Pantha BN, Dahal R, Li J, Lin JY, Jiang HX, Pomrenke G: Thermoelectric properties of InGaN alloys. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 042112. 10.1063/1.2839309View Article
  21. Xu G, Ding YJ, Zhao H, Jamil M, Liu G, Tansu N, Zotova IB, Stutz CE, Diggs DE, Fernelius N, Hopkins FK, Gallinat CS, Koblmüller G, Speck JS: THz Generation from InN Films due to Destructive Interference between Optical Rectification and Photocurrent Surge. Semicond Sci Technol 2010, 25: 015004. 10.1088/0268-1242/25/1/015004View Article
  22. Sun G, Xu G, Ding YJ, Zhao H, Liu G, Zhang J, Tansu N: Efficient Terahertz Generation from Multiple InGaN/GaN Quantum Wells. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2011, 17: 48. 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2049343View Article
  23. Farrell RM, Feezell DF, Schmidt MC, Haeger DA, Kelchner KM, Iso K, Yamada H, Saito M, Fujito K, Cohen DA, Speck JS, DenBaars SP, Nakamura S: Continuous-wave Operation of AlGaN-cladding-free Nonpolar m-Plane InGaN/GaN Laser Diodes. Jpn J Appl Phys 2007, 46: L761. 10.1143/JJAP.46.L761View Article
  24. Park SH, Park J, Yoon E: Optical Gain in InGaN/GaN Quantum Well Structures with Embedded AlGaN δ Layer. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 023508. 10.1063/1.2431477View Article
  25. Zhao H, Arif RA, Tansu N: Design Analysis of Staggered InGaN Quantum Wells Light-Emitting Diodes at 500–540 nm. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1104. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2016576View Article
  26. Zhao H, Liu G, Li XH, Huang GS, Poplawsky JD, Tafon Penn S, Dierolf V, Tansu N: Growths of Staggered InGaN Quantum Wells Light-Emitting Diodes Emitting at 520–525 nm Employing Graded Growth-Temperature Profile. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 061104. 10.1063/1.3204446View Article
  27. Zhao HP, Liu GY, Li XH, Arif RA, Huang GS, Poplawsky JD, Tafon Penn S, Dierolf V, Tansu N: Design and Characteristics of Staggered InGaN Quantum Wells Light-Emitting Diodes in the Green Spectral Regimes. IET Optoelectron 2009, 3: 283. 10.1049/iet-opt.2009.0050View Article
  28. Park SH, Ahn D, Koo BH, Kim JW: Dip-shaped InGaN/GaN quantum-well light-emitting diodes with high efficiency. Appl. Phys. Lett 2009, 95: 063507. 10.1063/1.3205127View Article
  29. Park SH, Ahn D, Kim JW: High-efficiency staggered 530 nm InGaN/InGaN/GaN quantum-well light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett 2009, 94: 041109. 10.1063/1.3075853View Article
  30. Liao CT, Tsai MC, Liou BT, Yen SH, Kuo YK: Improvement in output power of a 460 nm InGaN light-emitting diode using staggered quantum well. J Appl Phys 2010, 108: 063107. 10.1063/1.3471804View Article
  31. Zhao H, Arif RA, Tansu N: Self Consistent Analysis of Type-II 'W' InGaN-GaNAs Quantum Well Lasers. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 043104. 10.1063/1.2970107View Article
  32. Zhao H, Arif RA, Ee YK, Tansu N: Self-Consistent Analysis of Strain-Compensated InGaN-AlGaN Quantum Wells for Lasers and Light Emitting Diodes. IEEE J Quantum Electron 2009, 45: 66. 10.1109/JQE.2008.2004000View Article
  33. Park SH, Moon YT, Lee JS, Kwon HK, Park JS, Ahn D: Spontaneous emission rate of green strain-compensated InGaN/InGaN LEDs using InGaN substrate. Phys. Status Solidi A 2011, 208: 195. 10.1002/pssa.201026420View Article
  34. Zhao H, Liu G, Tansu N: Analysis of InGaN-delta-InN Quantum Wells for Light-Emitting Diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 131114. 10.1063/1.3493188View Article
  35. Zhao H, Liu G, Arif RA, Tansu N: Current Injection Efficiency Quenching Leading to Efficiency Droop in InGaN Quantum Well Light-Emitting Diodes. Solid State Electron 2010, 54: 1119. 10.1016/j.sse.2010.05.019View Article
  36. Wu YR, Lin YY, Huang HH, Singh J: Electronic and Optical Properties of InGaN Quantum Dot Based Light Emitters for Solid State Lighting. J Appl Phys 2009, 105: 013117. 10.1063/1.3065274View Article
  37. Matthews DR, Summers HD, Smowton PM, Hopkinson M: Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Wetting-layer States on the Gain-current Characteristic of Quantum-dot Lasers. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81: 4904. 10.1063/1.1532549View Article
  38. Winkelnkemper M, Schliwa A, Bimberg D: Interrelation of Structural and Electronic Properties in InGaN/GaN Quantum Dots Using an Eight-band k∙p Model. Phys Rev B 2006, 74: 155322. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155322View Article
  39. Zhang M, Bhattacharya P, Guo W: InGaN/GaN Self-organized Quantum Dot Green Light Emitting Diodes with Reduced Efficiency Droop. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 011103. 10.1063/1.3460921View Article
  40. Wei G, Forrest SR: Intermediate-Band Solar Cells Employing Quantum Dots Embedded in an Energy Fence Barrier. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 218. 10.1021/nl062564sView Article
  41. Tomić S, Harrison NM, Jones TS: Electronic Structure of QD Arrays: Application to Intermediate-band Solar Cells. Opt Quantum Electron 2008, 40: 313.View Article
  42. Tachibana K, Someya T, Arakawa Y: Nanometer-scale InGaN Self-assembled Quantum Dots Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 74: 383. 10.1063/1.123078View Article
  43. Simeonov D, Feltin E, Carlin JF, Butté R, Ilegems M, Grandjean N: Stranski-Krastanov GaN/AlN Quantum Dots Grown by Metal Organic Vapor Phase Epitaxy. J Appl Phys 2006, 99: 083509. 10.1063/1.2189975View Article
  44. Ee YK, Zhao H, Arif RA, Jamil M, Tansu N: Self-Assembled InGaN Quantum Dots on GaN Emitting at 520 nm Grown by Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 2008, 310: 2320. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.12.022View Article
  45. Ruffenach S, Maleyre B, Briot O, Gil B: Growth of InN Quantum Dots by MOVPE. Phys Status Solidi C 2005, 2: 826. 10.1002/pssc.200460319View Article
  46. Liu HY, Liew SL, Badcock T, Mowbray DJ, Skolnick MS, Ray SK, Choi TL, Groom KM, Stevens B, Hasbullah F, Jin CY, Hopkinson M, Hogg RA: P-doped 1.3 μm InAs/GaAs Quantum-dot Laser with a Low Threshold Current Density and High Differential Efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 073113. 10.1063/1.2336998View Article
  47. Sellin RL, Ribbat C, Grundmann M, Ledentsov NN, Bimberg D: Close-to-ideal Device Characteristics of High-power InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Qot Lasers. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78: 1207. 10.1063/1.1350596View Article
  48. Huffaker DL, Park G, Zou Z, Shchekin OB, Deppe DG: 1.3 μm Room-temperature GaAs-based Quantum-dot Laser. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73: 2564. 10.1063/1.122534View Article
  49. Li SB, Wu ZM, Jiang YD, Li W, Liao NM, Yu JS: Structure and 1/f Noise of Boron Doped Polymorphous Silicon Films. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 085706. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/8/085706View Article
  50. Wu J, Shao D, Dorogan VG, Li AZ, Li S, DeCuir EA Jr, Manasreh MO, Wang ZM, Mazur YI, Salamo GJ: Intersublevel Infrared Photodetector with Strain-Free GaAs Quantum Dot Pairs Grown by High-Temperature Droplet Epitaxy. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1512. 10.1021/nl100217kView Article
  51. Helfrich M, Groger R, Forste A, Litvinov D, Gerthsen D, Schimmel T, Schaadt DM: Investigation of Pre-structured GaAs Surfaces for Subsequent Site-selective InAs Quantum Dot Growth. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 211. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-211View Article
  52. Yeoh TS, Swint RB, Gaur A, Elarde VC, Coleman JJ: Selective Growth of InAs Quantum Dots by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2002, 8: 833. 10.1109/JSTQE.2002.801735View Article
  53. Li RR, Dapkus PD, Thompson ME, Jeong WG, Harrison C, Chaikin PM, Register RA, Adamson DH: Dense Arrays of Ordered GaAs Nanostructures by Selective Area Growth on Substrates Patterned by Block Copolymer Lithography. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 1689. 10.1063/1.126137View Article
  54. Tachibana K, Someya T, Ishida S, Arakawa Y: Selective Growth of InGaN Quantum Dot Structures and Their Microphotoluminescence at Room Temperature. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 3212. 10.1063/1.126632View Article
  55. Kuech TF, Mawst LJ: Nanofabrication of III-V Semiconductors Employing Diblock Copolymer Lithography. J Phys D Appl Phys 2010, 43: 183001. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/18/183001View Article
  56. Park JH, Khandekar AA, Park SM, Mawst LJ, Kuech TF, Nealey PF: Selective MOCVD Growth of Single-crystal Dense GaAs Quantum Dot Array Using Cylinder-forming Diblock Copolymers. J Cryst Growth 2006, 297: 283. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.09.049View Article
  57. Park JH, Kirch J, Mawst LJ, Liu CC, Nealey PF, Kuech TF: Controlled Growth of InGaAs/InGaAsP Quantum Dots on InP Substrates Employing Diblock Copolymer Lithography. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 113111. 10.1063/1.3224916View Article
  58. Pérez-Solórzano V, Gröning A, Jetter M, Riemann T, Christen J: Near-red Emission From Site-controlled Pyramidal InGaN Quantum Dots. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 163121.View Article
  59. Chen A, Chua SJ, Chen P, Chen XY, Jian LK: Fabrication of Sub-100 nm Patterns in SiO2 Templates by Electron-beam Lithography for the Growth of Periodic III-V Semiconductor Nanostructures. Nanotechnology 2006, 17: 3903. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/048View Article
  60. Chen P, Chen A, Chua SJ, Tan JN: Growth and Optical Properties of Highly Uniform and Periodic InGaN Nanostructures. Adv Mater 2007, 19: 1707. 10.1002/adma.200602110View Article
  61. Lee LK, Jung T, Ku PC: Fabrication of site-controlled, highly uniform and dense InGaN quantum dots. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference and Photonic Applications Systems Technologies, OSA Technical Digest (CD). Optical Society of America; 2008. paper CThS2 paper CThS2
  62. Chen P, Chua SJ, Wang YD, Sander MD, Fonstad CG: InGaN Nanorings and Nanodots by Selective Area Epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 143111. 10.1063/1.2056584View Article
  63. Krestnikov IL, Ledentsov NN, Hoffmann A, Bimberg D, Sakharov AV, Lundin WV, Tsatsul'nikov AF, Usikov AS, Alferov ZhI, Musikhin YuG, Gerthsen D: Quantum Dot Origin of Luminescence in InGaN-GaN Structures. Phys Rev B 2002, 66: 155310. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155310View Article
  64. Tu RC, Tun CJ, Chuo CC, Lee BC, Tsai CE, Wang TC, Chi J, Lee CP, Chi GC: Ultra-High-Density InGaN Quantum Dots Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Jpn J Appl Phys 2004, 43: L264. 10.1143/JJAP.43.L264View Article
  65. Okamoto K, Kawakami Y: High-Efficiency InGaN/GaN Light Emitters Based on Nanophotonics and Plasmonics. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2009, 15: 1199. 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2021530View Article
  66. Zhao H, Zhang J, Liu G, Tansu N: Surface Plasmon Dispersion Engineering via Double-Metallic Au/Ag Layers for III-Nitride Based Light-Emitting Diodes. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 074116.


© Liu et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.