Open Access

Over 95% of large-scale length uniformity in template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires by subzero-temperature electrodeposition

  • Sangwoo Shin1,
  • Bo Hyun Kong2,
  • Beom Seok Kim1,
  • Kyung Min Kim1,
  • Hyung Koun Cho2 and
  • Hyung Hee Cho1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20116:467

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-467

Received: 2 May 2011

Accepted: 23 July 2011

Published: 23 July 2011


In this work, we report highly uniform growth of template-assisted electrodeposited copper nanowires on a large area by lowering the deposition temperature down to subzero centigrade. Even with highly disordered commercial porous anodic aluminum oxide template and conventional potentiostatic electrodeposition, length uniformity over 95% can be achieved when the deposition temperature is lowered down to -2.4°C. Decreased diffusion coefficient and ion concentration gradient due to the lowered deposition temperature effectively reduces ion diffusion rate, thereby favors uniform nanowire growth. Moreover, by varying the deposition temperature, we show that also the pore nucleation and the crystallinity can be controlled.


Cu nanowire template-assisted electrodeposition length uniformity low-temperature electrodeposition nucleation crystallinity


Length uniformity in template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires is of great importance in realizing the nanowires as building blocks for various technological applications that specifically involve electron flow through the nanowires such as thermoelectric [1, 2], spintronics [3, 4], photovoltaics [5], interconnects [6, 7], and phase-change memory devices [8]. In feasibility aspect, template-assisted nanowires have an extraordinary advantage over other nanowires that are grown by different methods such as vapor-liquid-solid method [9] and electroless-etched method [10, 11]. In detail, the template can be readily used as a supporting matrix without any further fabrication process. Supporting matrix, which is essential in fabricating nanowire-based electronic devices, provides mechanical robustness, electrical insulation among adjacent nanowires, and fabrication feasibility when contacting the electrodes at the ends of the nanowires [12].

Ideally, template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires should all be connected to the conducting electrodes at the both ends. At one end, the seed layer that works as a working electrode holds all nanowires, but the problem arises from the other end. Nonuniform ion transport that is near and inside the template pores results in nonuniform growth of the nanowires. This in turn creates only a few numbers of nanowires that are fully grown to be exposed out of the template. By continuing the electrodeposition to further grow the premature nanowires, the fully grown nanowires start to create semi-spherical caps that completely block the other remaining pores having shorter nanowires, especially in widely used porous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) due to its high porosity and packing density. This is extremely critical in fabricating the nanowire-based devices since only a limited numbers of the nanowires are actually in contact at the both ends. In other words, major portion of the nanowires is malfunctioning.

Several attempts on the uniform growth of template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires have been made recently such as pulsed electrodeposition [1315], low-temperature electrodeposition [15], ultrasonic milling [16], and applying forced convection to the bulk electrolyte [17]. The most successful result achieved so far to the authors' best knowledge is from Stacy and co-workers where they achieved up to 93% of length uniformity in Bi2Te3 nanowires with length of 62-68 μm by employing pulsed electrodeposition in a well-ordered homemade AAO template at low deposition temperature (1°C to 4°C) [15]. Among the above-mentioned methods used to enhance the length uniformity, lowering the deposition temperature is shown to be highly effective, easily manipulated, and straightforward to proceed [15]. However, intensive study regarding the temperature effect on the growth of template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires is rarely done despite its importance [16, 18, 19].

Herein, we report highly uniform growth of template-assisted electrodeposited copper (Cu) nanowires by lowering the deposition temperature down to subzero centigrade. Cu nanowire is regarded as potential candidates for various applications including interconnects [6, 7], giant magnetoresistive materials [3, 4], infrared polarizer [20], and cooling applications [21, 22]. The ion diffusion rate, which directly influences the electrodeposition behavior thereby length uniformity, can be appropriately controlled by varying the deposition temperature. Moreover, we show that the pore nucleation and the crystallinity can also be controlled by varying the deposition temperature.

Experimental section

Commercially available AAO, Anodisc™ (nominal pore size 20 nm, Whatman, Maidstone, Kent, UK), which is about 60-μm thick, was used as an electrodeposition template. Anodisc™ can additionally give the most harsh electrodeposition conditions since this template exhibits extremely disordered form where the pores are nonuniformly distributed with different pore sizes at the each pore ends (see Figure A1 in Additional file 1) [15]. Also, the pores are seriously interconnected and defects are often observed. The overall pore size is about 200 nm to approximately 300 nm and the pores are spanned along the whole template. However, at the one end, the pores are separated into several smaller pores having pore size of about 20 nm to approximately 40 nm. In sum, the use of Anodisc™ can provide a lower limit of nanowire uniformity in growth of large-area nanowires by electrodeposition.

Cu was chosen to exclude any complex reagents and additives that may influence the ionic transport behavior. The aqueous Cu electrolyte simply consisted of 220 g/l CuSO4·2O (99%) and 32 g/l H2SO4 (95%) with highly deionized water (18.2 MΩ cm). All chemicals were purchased from Duksan Pure Chemicals (Seoul, Korea) and used as received without further purification process.

A three-electrode electrochemical cell was employed for Cu electrodeposition. A 300-nm Au with 20 nm of Cr adhesion layer was coated on one side of the template (narrow pore end) using e-beam evaporator to act as a working electrode. Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) and Pt mesh electrodes were employed for reference and counter electrodes, respectively. All potentials in this study are given in relation to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) since the electrode potential of the Ag/AgCl electrode is temperature dependent [23]. To calibrate the temperature effect, linear temperature coefficient of the Ag/AgCl electrode versus SHE is given as -1.01 mV/K [23]. Linearvoltametry and potentiostatic electrodeposition were done using a standard potentiostat (VersaSTAT3, Princeton Applied Research). The deposition temperature was controlled in the range of -2.4 to 60.5°C using a constant temperature circulating bath (HI-1030I, Hanil Industrial Machine, Seoul, Korea) and the temperature was precisely maintained under ± 0.1°C of deviation.

After electrodeposition, nanowire-embedded AAO template was cleaved and the cross section was observed using an optical microscope (BX51M, Olympus, Olympus America, Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA) to verify the large-area length uniformity of the nanowires. Subsequently, the Au/Cr working electrode was partially etched away and placed into the scanning electron microscope (SEM; S-4300, Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) and the X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Rint-2000, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in order to determine the pore nucleation and the preferential nanowire growth direction, respectively. For XRD measurement, Cu-Kα radiation source at 40 kV and 30 mA was used in 2θ range of 30° to approximately 90° with scan rate of 0.02°/s.

The crystallinity of the individual Cu nanowires was observed using transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM-3010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Individual nanowire samples were prepared by dissolving the AAO template in 1 M NaOH for 1 day followed by thorough rinsing with an absolute ethanol and 10 min of sonication.

Results and discussion

Prior to conduct potentiostatic electrodeposition, linearvoltametry was employed with scan rate of 0.1 V/s to investigate the appropriate reduction potential range of the Cu nanowires. Figure 1 shows the measured linear voltammogram. The results show that the temperature does not critically affect the Cu reduction potential which is in good agreement with previous study [24]. Reduction peak of Cu occurred in the range of 0.02 V to approximately 0.1 V. Therefore, we fixed the applied potential at 0.05 V and conducted potentiostatic electrodeposition throughout the whole temperature range.
Figure 1

Linear voltammograms of the Cu nanowires under varying temperature. The scan rate is 0.1 V/s.

Figure 2a shows electrodeposition current density transient curves for the Cu nanowires at various deposition temperatures. Briefly mentioning the electrodeposition stages are: (1) charging of electric double layer and subsequent development of diffusion layer at the vicinity of the surface of the working electrode which leads to an instantaneous rise and drop of the initial current density; (2) growth of nanowires inside the template where the current density remains steady; (3) overgrowth of the nanowires after reaching the pore end which leads to gradual increase of the current density due to the increase of the electrodepositing area. The nanowire growth rate can be derived from the time taken at the stage 2 which is presented in the inset. Inside the long and narrow pore channels, diffusion is the rate-determining process in electrochemical reactions [25]. The diffusion rate can be determined by the Fick's first law of diffusion where it is expressed as j = -D ΔC where j is the diffusion rate, D is the diffusion coefficient, and C is the local concentration. As the temperature is decreased, the diffusion coefficient of the Cu cations is also decreased since it follows the Arrhenius plot [26, 27]. Moreover, not only the diffusion coefficient is decreased but also the thickness of the diffusion layer is elongated as the deposition temperature is decreased [28, 29] since the nanoscale pore channels having aspect ratio up to 300:1 show a diffusion limited transport behavior [25]. In other words, concentration gradient at the diffusion layer is decreased. From the Fick's first law of diffusion, these two factors lead to the decrease of the mass transport rate. Therefore, by changing the deposition temperature, the nanowire growth rate can be significantly varied. At 60.5°C, it takes about 80 s to reach and fill the pore and the growth rate of the Cu nanowires is estimated as 745 nm/s whereas the growth rate is decreased down to about 45 nm/s at -2.4°C which is more than 16-fold decrease.
Figure 2

Transient electrodeposition current density curves of the Cu nanowires under varying temperature. (a) Full scale transient curves. Inset shows nanowire growth rate as a function of deposition temperature; (b) transient curves normalized by current and time maxima at the initial stage of the electrodeposition. Theoretical values for instantaneous and progressive nucleation models are also presented [31]. Dashed curve indicate instantaneous nucleation whereas dotted curve indicate progressive nucleation. i m and t m denote current maximum and its corresponding time.

After electrodepositing the Cu nanowires at different temperatures, the cross sections of the nanowire-embedded AAO templates were observed to determine the large-scale length uniformity. The length uniformity was determined by obtaining the average nanowire length from the nanowire growth front and dividing by the length of the template. Nanowires were sufficiently deposited with enough time so that the Cu overdeposits were fully exposed on the top surface of the template. Figure 3 shows the optical microscope images of the nanowire-embedded AAO templates with varying deposition temperature. It is clearly seen that the overall length uniformity of the Cu nanowires are significantly enhanced as the deposition temperature is decreased. At high deposition temperature condition, the growth front was shown to be very disordered and fluctuating while highly uniform growth front which is located near the top edge of the AAO template was observed at subzero centigrade temperature conditions. At 60.5°C, only about 65% of the total length of the template is filled while more than 95% of the nanowire length uniformity is achieved at -2.4°C. Considering that these samples are potentiostatically electrodeposited and the AAO template used in this work is extremely disordered, this result is remarkable. Note once again that Stacy and co-workers recently achieved about 93% of nanowire length uniformity by pulsed electrodeposition in a well-ordered homemade AAO template when the deposition temperature was between 1°C and 4°C [15].
Figure 3

Optical microscope images of the cross sections of the AAO template with Cu nanowires. These are grown at various deposition temperatures: (a) -2.4°C; (b) -1.5°C; (c) 0.0°C; (d) 5.2°C; (e) 11.5°C; (f) 25.6°C; (g) 45.2°C; (h) 60.5°C. (i) and (j) show large-scale view of the cross sections at -2.4°C and 60.5°C, respectively. Yellow arrows indicate empty pores.

This extremely high length uniformity in a disordered AAO template is mainly attributed to the slow nanowire growth rate which is achieved by reducing the ion transport rate at low temperature. The slow ion diffusion may inhibit two major ion transport regions that can lead to the nonuniform nanowire growth: First is the transport of cations from the bulk electrolyte to the pore entrance. At room temperature, without any forced convection, cations entering the pores tend to be concentrated at the edge area of the template since the excess cations are constantly diffused from the adjacent bulk electrolyte due to the hemispherical diffusion layers formed at the edge area [17]. Second is the cation transport along the pore channels. Different pore diameters and native defects inside the pores can lead to nonuniform ion transport [15, 17], resulting nonuniform nanowire growth. These two unfavorable transport behaviors are believed to be significantly hindered even without any stirring or pulsed electrodeposition when the deposition temperature is sufficiently lowered, thereby achieving extremely high length uniformity.

It is also known that the pore nucleation is dependent on the deposition temperature [17]. It is interesting to note that the Anodisc™ template may provide an effective way to evaluate the pore nucleation. As mentioned earlier, Anodisc™ exhibits interbranched pore structures at the narrow-end side of the template. As the electrodeposition proceeds, the fastest nucleated pore will reach the main (wide) pore and eventually block all the other narrow pores that share the same main pore. The narrow end is about 100 nm to approximately 200 nm long (Figure A1(f) in Additional file 1) and regarding the fast growth rate, this narrow end will be filled in a very short period of time, especially when the deposition temperature is high. By blocking other pores, we can easily distinguish the pores that are not nucleated at the initial stage since the cations cannot be supplied to the non-nucleated pores. Therefore, this narrow feature may provide an effective means of evaluating the instantaneous pore nucleation.

To determine the pore nucleation, the back side of the nanowire-embedded AAO templates with Au/Cr layer partially etched away were observed using SEM which is presented in Figure 4. It can be clearly seen that at 60.5°C empty pores were easily observed whereas over 90% of the pores were nucleated at -1.5°C. Obviously, this is attributed to the different growth process of the Cu nanowires at various deposition temperatures. At high deposition temperature, the initial nucleation process is mainly instantaneous where the nuclei are mainly formed in the initial voltage pulse [30]. However, by lowering the deposition temperature, the initial nucleation process tends to shift toward progressive nucleation mode in which the nuclei are continuously formed during the nanowire growth. This can be verified by analyzing the current maxima at the initial stage of the electrodeposition curve in Figure 2b where two different nucleation modes are presented along with experimental data in a normalized form [31]. When progressively nucleating, the chances of pore nucleation during the nanowire growth are higher than instantaneous nucleation since the nuclei are continuously formed during the nanowire growth, even after the initial stage. Moreover, as mentioned earlier, slow nanowire growth also favors more pores to be nucleated before the pores are blocked. Therefore, by lowering the deposition temperature, a large-scale length uniformity and pore filling can be simultaneously achieved.
Figure 4

SEM images of backside of the AAO templates with Au/Cr seed layers partially etched away. Dark areas indicate empty pores. (a) -1.5°C; (b) 60.5°C.

This different nucleation and growth processes can also affect the crystallinity of the nanowires [18]. In order to investigate the influence of deposition temperature on the crystallinity of the electrodeposited Cu nanowires, we conducted XRD and TEM studies. In general, it is well known that the electrodeposited nanowire exhibits a polycrystalline nature when grown potentiostatically [32, 33]. However, the crystallinity can be enhanced to a certain degree by increasing the deposition temperature [18]. When the deposition temperature is low, slow growth rate promotes increased nucleation sites and growth of new grains. In contrary, high deposition temperature favors the growth of pre-existing grains which leads to the deposition of single crystals rather than the creation of new grains, thereby enhancing the crystallinity [18].

However, XRD results (Figure A2 in Additional file 1) showed that the overall grain orientation and the preferential growth direction were not significantly changed with deposition temperature. This is probably due to the fact that the electrodeposited nanowires are generally polycrystalline in nature, and XRD can only give the overall sum of multiple crystallographic orientations, which implies that without a significant enhancement of crystallinity (single crystalline), the diffraction patterns should not be varied much. The preferential growth direction of Cu nanowires was (111) throughout the whole temperature range. The TEM images of the Cu nanowires either from Figure 5a or 5b showed that a large number of spotty contrasts were observed with rough surface morphology regardless of the deposition temperature, which is typically observed in electrodeposited nanowires [3336]. Obviously, this implies that the nanowires are in polycrystalline nature where the growth process is based on a typical 3D nucleation-coalescence mechanism [30, 37]. However, the selected area electron diffraction patterns which are presented in the insets of Figure 5 showed an enhancement in the crystallinity with increasing deposition temperature where more enhanced diffraction spots were observed and the polycrystalline ring patterns were subsequently weakened. This directly indicates that the higher deposition temperature induces more favorable growth of existing grains that results in enhanced crystallinity, which is in conjuction with nucleation mechanism as mentioned earlier.
Figure 5

TEM images of the Cu nanowires at various deposition temperatures. (a) -1.5°C; (b) 60.5°C. Insets are the selected area electron diffraction patterns.


In summary, we have achieved length uniformity of template-assisted electrodeposited nanowires over 95%, even in highly disordered commercial AAO template, when the deposition temperature was lowered down to subzero centigrade degrees. Due to the decreased ion diffusion rate and thereby decreased nanowire growth rate, uniform electrodeposition was enabled. Moreover, when the deposition temperature was lowered, pore nucleation was also significantly enhanced whereas the crystallinity was slightly decreased as the nucleation mechanism tended to proceed toward progressive nucleation. Therefore, by lowering the deposition temperature, large-scale length uniformity and pore filling can be simultaneously achieved which are both extremely important in realizing the nanowire array as practical large-scale applications.



anodic aluminum oxide




standard hydrogen electrode


scanning electron microscope


X-ray diffractometer


transmission electron microscope.



This study was supported by Mid-career Researcher Program through NRF grant funded by the MEST (No. 2011-0000252 and No. 2011-0017673). The authors greatly appreciate Ha-Yeong Kim for valuable effort on help with the XRD measurements.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University
School of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University


  1. Lim JR, Whitacre JF, Fleurial JP, Huang CK, Ryan MA, Myung NV: Fabrication method for thermoelectric nanodevices. Adv Mater 2005, 17: 1488. 10.1002/adma.200401189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Keyani J, Stacy AM, Sharp J: Assembly and measurement of a hybrid nanowire-bulk thermoelectric device. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 233106. 10.1063/1.2400199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Piraux L, George JM, Despres JF, Leroy C, Ferain E, Legras R, Ounadjela K, Fert A: Giant magnetoresistance in magnetic multilayered nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 65: 2484.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ohgai T, Hoffer X, Fábián A, Gravier L, Ansermet JP: Electrochemical synthesis and magnetoresistance properties of Ni, Co and Co/Cu nanowires in a nanoporous anodic oxide layer on metallic aluminium. J Mater Chem 2003, 13: 2530. 10.1039/b306581bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Xu HB, Chen HZ, Xu WJ, Wang M: Fabrication of organic copper phthalocyanine nanowire arrays via a simple AAO template-based electrophoretic deposition. Chem Phys Lett 2005, 412: 294. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.07.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bid A, Bora A, Raychaudhuri AK: Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter ≥15 nm: Applicability of Bloch-Grüneisen theorem. Phys Rev B 2006, 74: 035426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu Z, Bando Y: A novel method for preparing cu nanorods and nanowires. Adv Mater 2003, 15: 303. 10.1002/adma.200390073View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tanaka H, Nishihara T, Ohtsuka T, Morimoto K, Yamada N, Morita K: Electrical switching phenomena in a phase change material in contact with metallic nanowires. Jpn J Appl Phys 2002, 41: L1443. 10.1143/JJAP.41.L1443View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu Y, Yang P: Direct observation of vapor-liquid-solid nanowire growth. J Amer Chem Soc 2001, 123: 3165. 10.1021/ja0059084View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Peng KQ, Yan YJ, Gao SP, Zhu J: Synthesis of large-area SiNW arrays via self-assembling nanoelectrochemistry. Adv Mater 2002, 14: 1164. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020816)14:16<1164::AID-ADMA1164>3.0.CO;2-EView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim BS, Shin S, Shin SJ, Kim KM, Cho HH: Micro-nano hybrid structures with manipulated wettability using a two-step silicon etching on a large area. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 333. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-333View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Abramson AR, Kim WC, Huxtable ST, Yan H, Wu Y, Majumdar A, Tien CL, Yang P: Fabrication and characterization of a nanowire/polymer-based nanocomposite for a prototype thermoelectric device. J Microelectromech Syst 2004, 13: 505. 10.1109/JMEMS.2004.828742View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nielsch K, Müller F, Li AP, Gösele U: Uniform nickel deposition into ordered alumina pores by pulsed electrodeposition. Adv Mater 2000, 12: 582. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200004)12:8<582::AID-ADMA582>3.0.CO;2-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee J, Farhangfar S, Lee J, Cagnon L, Scholz R, Gösele U, Nielsch K: Tuning the crystallinity of thermoelectric Bi 2 Te 3 nanowire arrays grown by pulsed electrodeposition. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 365701. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/36/365701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Trahey L, Becker CR, Stacy AM: Electrodeposited bismuth telluride nanowire arrays with uniform growth fronts. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 2535. 10.1021/nl070711wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsai KT, Huang YR, Lai MY, Liu CY, Wang HH, He JH, Wang YL: Identical-length nanowire arrays in anodic alumina templates. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2010, 10: 8293. 10.1166/jnn.2010.2742View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Keyani J: Electrodeposition and device incorporation of bismuth antimony nanowire arrays. PhD thesis. University of California at Berkeley, Department of Chemistry; 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Toimil Molares ME, Buschmann V, Dobrev D, Neumann R, Scholz R, Schuchert IU, Vetter J: Single-crystalline copper nanowires produced by electrochemical deposition in polymeric ion track membranes. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 62. 10.1002/1521-4095(200101)13:1<62::AID-ADMA62>3.0.CO;2-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Razeeb KM, Roy S: Thermal diffusivity of nonfractal and fractal nickel nanowires. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 084302. 10.1063/1.2906347View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Pang YT, Meng GW, Zhang Y, Fang Q, Zhang LD: Copper nanowire arrays for infrared polarizer. Appl Phys A 2003, 76: 533. 10.1007/s00339-002-1483-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Li C, Wang Z, Wang PI, Peles Y, Koratkar N, Peterson GP: Nanostructured copper interfaces for enhanced boiling. Small 2008, 4: 1084. 10.1002/smll.200700991View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen R, Lu MC, Srinivasan V, Wang Z, Cho HH, Majumdar A: Nanowires for enhanced boiling heat transfer. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 548. 10.1021/nl8026857View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sawyer DT, Sobkowiak A, Roberts JL: Electrochemistry for Chemists. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Lippkow D, Strehblow HH: Structural investigations of thin films of copper-selenide electrodeposited at elevated temperatures. Electrochim Acta 1998, 43: 2131. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)10148-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlörb H, Haehnel V, Khatri MS, Srivastav A, Kumar A, Schultz L, Fähler S: Magnetic nanowires by electrodeposition within templates. Phys Stat Sol B 2010, 247: 2364. 10.1002/pssb.201046189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Katase T, Murase K, Hirato T, Awakura Y: Redox and transport behaviors of Cu(I) ions in TMHA-Tf 2 N ionic liquid solution. J Appl Electrochem 2007, 37: 339. 10.1007/s10800-006-9262-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Moats MS, Hiskey JB, Collins DW: The effect of copper, acid, and temperature on the diffusion coefficient of cupric ions in simulated electrorefining electrolytes. Hydrometallurgy 2000, 56: 255. 10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00070-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerasimov VV, Rozenfeld IL: Effect of temperature on the diffusion current and the thickness of the diffusion layer. Russ Chem Bull 1956, 5: 797. 10.1007/BF01169982View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Del Campo FJ, Neudeck A, Compton RG, Marken F: Low-temperature sonoelectrochemical processes Part 1. Mass transport and cavitation effects of 20 kHz ultrasound in liquid ammonia. J Electroanal Chem 1999, 477: 71. 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00391-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Paunovic M, Schlesinger M: Fundamentals of Electrochemical Deposition. 2nd edition. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Scharifker BR, Hills G: Theoretical and experimental studies of multiple nucleation. Electrochim Acta 1983, 28: 879. 10.1016/0013-4686(83)85163-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yin AJ, Li J, Jian W, Bennett AJ, Xu JM: Fabrication of highly ordered metallic nanowire arrays by electrodeposition. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 79: 1039. 10.1063/1.1389765View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Menke EJ, Thompson MA, Xiang C, Yang LC, Penner RM: Lithographically patterned nanowire electrodeposition. Nat Mater 2006, 5: 914. 10.1038/nmat1759View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Toimil Molares ME, Brötz J, Buschmann V, Dobrev D, Neumann R, Scholz R, Schuchert IU, Trautmann C, Vetter J: Etched heavy ion tracks in polycarbonate as template for copper nanowires. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 2001, 185: 192. 10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00755-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zong RL, Zhou J, Li B, Fu M, Shi SK, Li LT: Optical properties of transparent copper nanorod and nanowire arrays embedded in anodic alumina oxide. J Chem Phys 2005, 123: 094710. 10.1063/1.2018642View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gao T, Meng G, Wang Y, Sun S, Zhang L: Electrochemical synthesis of copper nanowires. J Phys Condens Matter 2002, 14: 355. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/3/306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tian M, Wang J, Kurtz J, Mallouk TE, Chan MHW: Electrochemical growth of single-crystal metal nanowires via a 2d nucleation and growth mechanism. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 919. 10.1021/nl034217dView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Shin et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.