The in-plane spin splitting of conduction-band electron has been investigated in an asymmetric (001) GaAs/Al_{
x
}Ga_{1-x
}As quantum well by time-resolved Kerr rotation technique under a transverse magnetic field. The distinctive anisotropy of the spin splitting was observed while the temperature is below approximately 200 K. This anisotropy emerges from the combined effect of Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling plus asymmetric potential gradients. We also exploit the temperature dependence of spin-splitting energy. Both the anisotropy of spin splitting and the in-plane effective g-factor decrease with increasing temperature.

PACS: 78.47.jm, 71.70.Ej, 75.75.+a, 72.25.Fe,

Keywords

quantum beatsspin-orbit couplingmagnetic properties of nanostructuresoptical creation of spin polarized

Introduction

The properties of spins in semiconductor materials have attracted much more attentions since the invention of spintronics and spin-based quantum information [1–3]. In those fields, the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) plays a key role on the properties of spin states in bulk and low-dimensional semiconductor materials. It not only results in the zero-magnetic field spin splitting, which is the main source of the spin relaxation through D'yakonov-Perel (DP) mechanism and novel phenomenon such as the generation of the spin current [4], but also significantly affects the spin splitting with an external magnetic field B > 0.

In general, the spin splitting of electron or hole at B > 0 in semiconductor is described by a finite Zeeman splitting energy and characterized by the effective g-factor, which is necessary for the spin manipulation and spin-based qubit with an external electrical/magnetic field in semiconductor. So far, the effective g-factor has been intensively investigated in many literatures during past few decades [5–13]. For conduction-band electron, it is found that the effective g-factor is strongly dependent on the point group symmetry in semiconductor materials [7]. It is isotropic and independent on the orientation of applied magnetic field in GaAs bulk due to T_{d} point symmetry group. On the contrast, the effective g-factor becomes anisotropic and significantly depends on the direction of magnetic field in quantum structures such as GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures and quantum well (QW) due to the reducing symmetry [7]. For example, where the point symmetry group is reduced to D_{2d}, in a rectangular/symmetric QW grown on the (001)-orientated substrate, the effective g-factor can have different values for B applied in the direction normal to the plane of QW and for B in the plane of the QW due to the additional potential confinement: g_{
xx
} = g_{
yy
} ≠ g_{
zz
} (x//[100]) [5–7, 10]. Furthermore, where the symmetry is reduced to C_{2v} in an asymmetric QW with the inversion-asymmetric confining potentials, the effective g-factor is dependent on the direction of an applied in-plane magnetic field, which results in the anisotropic Zeeman splitting [14]. Up to now, the spin splitting (Zeeman splitting) at B > 0 is considered to be only characterized by the effective g-factor. In fact, two proposals [7, 14] have been predicted that the Dresselhaus SOC significantly affects the spin splitting of electron at B > 0 plus structure inversion asymmetry. A new term, defined as ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ in Ref. [14], can result in the measurable anisotropy of the in-plane spin splitting, although it is not a Zeeman term. We call it as Zeeman-like term thereinafter. The anisotropic spin splitting was measured experimentally at B > 0 with an applied external electric field to reduce the symmetry of quantum film but interpreted in terms of anisotropic effective g-factor by Oestreich et al. [9] In this Letter, we use the time-resolved Kerr rotation (TRKR) [15, 16] technique to study the in-plane spin splitting via the accurate measurements of the Larmor procession frequency in a specially designed (001) GaAs/AlGaAs undoped QW with asymmetric confined barriers under an in-plane magnetic field. We show that the spin splitting is found to be obviously anisotropic for B parallel to [110] and [1-10].

Experimental procedure

The sample on investigation here is grown on (001) oriented semi-insulating GaAs substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. It contains a 50-nm-wide Al_{0.28}Ga_{0.72}As barrier layer, an 8-nm-wide GaAs quantum well, the other sloping barrier grown with content of Al changing from 4.28% to 28% on the length of approximately 9 nm, and the barrier layer of a width 50 nm. The upper part of the structure is covered with a 5-nm GaAs layer to avoid the oxidation of barrier. TRKR experiment was carried out in an Oxford magneto-optical cryostat supplied with a 7-T split-coil super-conducting magnet. The sample was excited near normal incidence with a degenerate pump and delayed probe pulses from a Coherent mode-locked Ti-sapphire laser (approximately 120 fs, 76 MHz). The center of the photon energy was tuned for the maximum Kerr rotation signal for each temperature setting. The laser beams were focused to a spot size of approximately 100 μm, and the pump and probe beams have an average power of 5.0 and 0.5 mW, respectively. The helicity of linearly polarized pump beam was modulated at 50 kHz by a photoelastic modulator for lock-in detection. The temporal evolution of the electron spins, which were generated by the circularly polarized pump pulse, was recorded by measuring Kerr rotation angle θ_{K}(Δt) of the linearly polarized probe pulse while sweeping Δt.

Results and discussion

Figure 1a shows the time evolution of the Kerr rotation θ_{K}(Δt) measured at 1.5 K with an in-plane magnetic field of B = 2.0 T (Voigt geometry [3]). The experimental data are plotted by open rectangular and solid circular symbols, which represent that the magnetic fields are applied along axes [110] and [1-10], respectively. The data show strong oscillations corresponding to the spin precession about the external magnetic field. Here, the affect of hole spin is ignored due to fast spin relaxation [17]. It is obvious that Larmor precession periods of two curves are different. The duration of three precession periods, as labeled in Figure 1a, corresponds to 3T_{L} = 475 and 380 ps for B//[110] and [1-10], respectively. The experimental spin procession dynamics are well fitted with a mono-exponential decay time and a single frequency as presented by red lines in Figure 1a by the following equation:

where S_{0} is the initial spin density, τ_{s} is spin lifetime, and ω the Larmor frequency. By this way, we obtain the exact value of the Larmor frequency ω and then the splitting energy ΔE_{
B//[110]
} = 0.0263 meV and ΔE_{
B//[1-10]
} = 0.0326 meV through the equation ΔE = ћω with in-plane magnetic field parallel to [110] and [1-10], respectively. Here, we use $\left|\Delta {E}_{\left[1\stackrel{\u0304}{1}0\right]}-\Delta {E}_{\left[110\right]}\right|\u2215\left|\Delta {E}_{\left[1\stackrel{\u0304}{1}0\right]}\right|$ to denote the anisotropy of the in-plane spin splitting. We found that this anisotropy is more than 19% in this single asymmetric (001) GaAs/AlGaAs QW. We also checked the photogenerated spin concentration dependence of the spin splitting, which can be reached by changing the pump power. Figure 1b shows the pump power dependence of spin splitting with the magnetic fields along [110] and [1-10] at 1.5 K. The splitting energy slowly decreases with increasing pump power up to approximately 20 mW. The change of spitting energy is less than 7% for both curves and can be ignored. Therefore, the observed anisotropy is not relevant to the carrier concentration.

Now we extract the contribution of Zeeman-like term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ on the anisotropic in-plane spin splitting at B > 0. As calculated by Winkler, the spin-splitting energy writes as [14]:

where g^{*} is the effective g-factor, B_{//} is the in-plane external magnetic field, ζ = +1 for B// [1-10] and ζ = -1 for B//[110], and γ is the cubic Dresselhaus constant. The Zeeman-like term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$, which is derived from first-order perturbation theory applied to the Dresselhaus term, emerges from the combined effect of BIA and SIA [14]. It is clear that the term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ results in the anisotropic spin splitting at B > 0. As expected in Equation 2, the measured spin splitting is linearly dependent on the magnetic field with a prefactor $G={g}^{*}{\mu}_{B}-2\zeta {b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ for both directions of applied magnetic fields as shown in Figure 1c. The slope of the B linear dependence will allow us to obtain the value of G accurately, which are G_{[110]} = 0.0130 meV/T and ${G}_{\left[1\stackrel{\u0304}{1}0\right]}$ = 0.0162 meV/T for B along [110] and [1-10]. The difference of two values results from the opposite sign of prefactor ζ. According to Equation 3, ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ is found to be equal to approximately 0.8 μeV/T. As discussed above, a proper anisotropic Zeeman term, described in Equation (7.4) in Ref. [14], also produces the anisotropic spin splitting at B > 0 in an asymmetric (001) GaAs/AlGaAs QW. However, the prefactor ${z}_{41}^{6c6c}{\epsilon}_{z}$ is about 0.039 μeV/T for realistic parameters with the assumed internal electric field of approximately 50 kV/cm induced by the asymmetric potential gradients. It is about 20 times smaller comparing to the value of term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$. We conclude that the Zeeman-like term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ is the main source of the anisotropy of spin splitting at B > 0 in an asymmetric QW. Additionally, the Rashba term also gives rise to a nontrivial splitting in the presence of a magnetic field, but the splitting is isotropic [14]. In fact, the Rashba term is considered to be very small in this work because we did not observe significantly the anisotropy of in-plane spin relaxation [16] as shown in Figure 1a. It is consistent with the results of Ref. [18]. As shown in Equation 3, the Zeeman-like term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ is proportional to the cubic Dresselhaus constant γ. Numerical calculations yields γ = 29.96 eV/Å^{3} at approximately 1.5 K. Here, we use the value of approximately 0.8 μeV/T of ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ and an electron wave function calculated by the k p method [19] in this asymmetric QW. It is in agreement with the value of 27.58 eV/Å^{3} (see Table 6.3 in Ref. [14]). The remaining deviations of γ probably result from differences between the actual and the nominal sample structures which lead to uncertainties in the calculation of the wave function asymmetry.

Finally, we systematically investigate the anisotropy of in-plane spin splitting for the temperatures between 1.5 and 300 K keeping the fixed excitation power of approximately 5 mW and the fixed external magnetic field of approximately 2 T. Figure 2a shows the values of spin splitting as a function of temperature for B along [110] and [1-10], respectively. Both values decrease while the temperature is elevated. It is noted that the difference of spin splitting is maximum at low temperature of approximately 1.5 K and almost disappears when the temperature is up to 200 K. In order to clearly show the anisotropy of spin splitting, we have extracted precisely the values of $\left|\Delta {E}_{\left[1\stackrel{\u0304}{1}0\right]}-\Delta {E}_{\left[110\right]}\right|\u2215\left|\Delta {E}_{\left[1\stackrel{\u0304}{1}0\right]}\right|$ for the full temperature range and depicted in Figure 2b. As discussed above, the term ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$ is dominant in the anisotropic spin splitting at B > 0. Let us recall the expression of prefactor ${b}_{41,2}^{6c6c}$, the electron is implied to be phase coherent before colliding with the walls. This assumption is true at low temperature. However, the phase coherent length of electron is not a constant while the temperature varies from 1.5 to 300 K [20, 21]. We believe this is main source of decreasing of the spin-splitting anisotropy with increasing temperature. The in-plane effective electron g-factor can also be extracted from Equation 2. It is about g^{*} = 0.25 at 1.5 K and very closed to that (g^{*} = 0.26) in 10-nm-width well with the same Al fraction [11]. The inset of Figure 2b shows temperature dependence of in-plane effective electron g-factor. It decreases with increasing temperature. This trend is consistent with the former reports [8, 12, 13].

Conclusions

We observed the anisotropic in-plane spin splitting of the conduction-band electron in an asymmetric (001) GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well using TRKR technique with applied magnetic fields. It is confirmed that Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling can significantly affect the in-plane spin splitting at B > 0 combining the asymmetric confinement potential via the numerical comparison with the proper anisotropic Zeeman splitting.

Abbreviations

BIA:

bulk inversion asymmetry

DP:

D'yakonov-Perel

QW:

quantum well

SIA:

structure inversion asymmetry

SOC:

spin-orbit coupling

TRKR:

time-resolved Kerr rotation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of this work from the Chinese-French NSFC-ANR project (grant number 10911130356), National Science Foundation of China (grant number 10774183, 10874212), and National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB930500). One of the authors (HQ) would like to thank Prof. R. Winkler, Prof. V. K. Kalevich, and Prof. V. L. Korenev for many fruitful discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

(2)

College of Physics, Jilin University

(3)

State Key for Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Awschalom DD, Loss D, Samarth N: Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2002.View Article

Žutić I, Fabian J, Das Sarma S: Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev Mod Phys 2004, 76: 323. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323View Article

Sinova J, Culcer D, Niu Q, Sinitsyn NA, Jungwirth T, MacDonald AH: Universal intrinsic spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 2004, 92: 126603.View Article

Ivchenko EL, Kiselev AA: Electron g-factor of quantum-well and superlattices.Sov Phys Semicond 1992, 26: 827.

Kalevich VK, Korenev VL: Anisotropy of the electron g-factor in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum-wells.JETP Lett 1992, 56: 253.

Kalevich VK, Korenev VL: Electron g-factor anisotropy in asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well.JETP Lette 1993, 57: 557.

Oestreich M, Rühle WW: Temperature dependence of the electron Landé g factor in GaAs. Phys Rev Lett 1995, 74: 2315. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2315View Article

Oestreich M, Hallstein S, Rühle WW: Quantum beats in semiconductors. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 1996, 2: 747. 10.1109/2944.571776View Article

Le Jeune P, Robart D, Marie X, Amand T, Brousseau M, Barrau J, Kalevich V, Rodichev D: Anisotropy of the electron Landé g factor in quantum wells. Semicond Sci Technol 1997, 12: 380. 10.1088/0268-1242/12/4/006View Article

Yugova IA, Greilich A, Yakovlev DR, Kiselev AA, Bayer M, Petrov VV, Dolgikh YuK, Reuter D, Wieck AD: Universal behavior of the electron g factor in GaAs/Al
_{
x
}
Ga
_{1-x
}
As quantum wells. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 245302.View Article

Zawadzki W, Pfeffer P, Bratschitsch R, Chen Z, Cundiff ST, Murdin BN, Pidgeon CR: Temperature dependence of the electron spin g factor in GaAs. Phys Rev B 2008, 78: 245203.View Article

Hübner J, Döhrmann S, Hägele D, Oestreich M: Temperature-dependent electron Landé g factor and the interband matrix element of GaAs. Phys Rev B 2009, 79: 193307.View Article

Winkler R: Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in 2D Electron and Hole Systems. Volume Chapter 7. Berlin: Springer; 2003.View Article

Koopmans B, Haverkort JEM, de Jonge WJM, Karczewski G: Time-resolved magnetization modulation spectroscopy: a new probe of ultrafast spin dynamics. J Appl Phys 1999, 85: 6763. 10.1063/1.370191View Article

Liu BL, Zhao HM, Wang J, Liu LS, Wang WX, Chen DM: Electron density dependence of in-plane spin relaxation anisotropy in GaAs/AlGaAs two-dimensional electron gas. Applied Phys Lett 2007, 90: 112111. 10.1063/1.2713353View Article

Amand T, Marie X, Le Jeune P, Brousseau M, Robart D, Barrau J, Planel R: Spin quantum beats of 2D excitons. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78: 1355. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1355View Article

Eldridge PS, Leyland WJH, Lagoudakis PG, Harley RT, Phillips RT, Winkler R, Henini M, Taylor D: Rashba conduction band spin-splitting for asymmetric quantum well potentials. Phys Rev B 2010, 82: 045317.View Article

Xia JB: Effective-mass theory for superlattices grown on (11N)-oriented substrates. Phys Rev B 1991, 43: 9856. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.9856View Article

Hiramoto T, Hirakawa K, Iye Y, Ikoma T: Phase coherence length of electron waves in narrow AlGaAs quantum wires fabricated by focused ion beam implantation. Appl Phys Lett 1989, 54: 2103. 10.1063/1.101177View Article

Bäuerle C, Mallet F, Schopfer F, Mailly D, Eska G, Saminadayar L: Experimental test of numerical renormalization-group theory for inelastic scattering from magnetic impurities. Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95: 266805.View Article

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.