The current image of single SnO2 nanobelt nanodevice studied by conductive atomic force microscopy
© Wang et al; licensee Springer. 2011
Received: 21 July 2011
Accepted: 4 October 2011
Published: 4 October 2011
A single SnO2 nanobelt was assembled on a pair of Au electrodes by electric-field assembly method. The electronic transport property of single SnO2 nanobelt was studied by conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM). Back-to-back Schottky barrier-type junctions were created between AFM tip/SnO2 nanobelt/Au electrode which can be concluded from the I-V curve. The current images of single SnO2 nanobelt nanodevices were also studied by C-AFM techniques, which showed stripes patterns on the nanobelt surface. The current images of the nanobelt devices correlate the microscopy with separate transport properties measurement together.
KeywordsSnO2 nanobelt C-AFM current image
As an important wide band n-type semiconductor, SnO2 possesses many unique optical and electrical properties which have been widely used in optoelectronic devices and gas sensors [1–4]. One dimensional (1-D) SnO2 have been reported to have some different characteristics from the bulk crystal due to its large surface-to-volume ratio . Nanodevices based on 1-D SnO2 nanostructures have been fabricated and showed significant potential for applications ranging from field-effect transistors, gas sensors, displays, as well as solar cells [6–9]. Although promising results of the gas sensing and other performance of 1-D SnO2 have been reported, the development of highly sensitized devices remains a future challenge. Usually, the surface atoms and states on the (1-D) SnO2 surface play an important role in its transport behavior which complicates the nanodevice characterization . Recent research result showed that the surface states indeed existed in these wires which could be detected in a contactless manner by spectral analysis . Thus the better understanding of the surface states affected the device transport property needed. The transport property of the nanobelts device and the surface states on the (1-D) SnO2 surface must be cared in order to fabricate the practical application of nanodevices. It is difficult for us investigating the transport property of one single nanobelt in the nanometer scale before atomic force microscopy (AFM), especially the conductive AFM (C-AFM) with a conductive tip; in recent years, more and more are used to investigate the transport property and the surface property on the nanostructure in microscope scales [12–15]. AFM tip coated with metal can serve as the conducting electrode, and the transport property of the nanowires can be studied through the I-V curve recorded by C-AFM technique . Furthermore, the current image, simultaneously with the AFM topography, can provide the direct information how the current flows through the nanostructure surface [17, 18]. In this paper, singe SnO2 nanobelt device is assembled across opposing Au electrodes by electric-field assembly method . Nonlinear and asymmetric I-V curve are obtained by applying a small voltage onto the conductive AFM tip positioned directly on the surface of SnO2 nanobelt. We conclude the nonlinear and asymmetric I-V behavior resulted from the back-to-back Schottky barriers between AFM tip/SnO2 nanobelt/electrode, and the Schottky barriers is related to the surface states on the nanobelt surface. The current images of the nanobelt device are also studied by C-AFM techniques, which show the current flow through the single nanobelt devices clearly. The results showed that the surface states can affect the transport property of the nanobelt device and display stripe patterns in the current images.
SnO2 nanobelts are synthesized using techniques described in Ref. . Briefly, a horizontal alumina tube (outer diameter, 3.7 mm; length, 120 cm) is mounted inside a high-temperature tube furnace. A mixture of SnO2 and graphite powders is placed on an alumina wafer. After transferring the wafer to the center of the alumina tube, the tube is evacuated by a mechanical rotary pump to a pressure of 6 × 10-2 Torr. During the experiment, a constant flow of N2 is maintained, and the pump continually evacuated the system to keep the pressure inside the tube. The temperature of the furnace is increased to 900°C from room temperature and kept at 900°C for 1 h. After the furnace is cooled down to room temperature, a white wool-like product is formed in a high yield on Si wafer near the boat of the wafer.
In order to fabricate one single SnO2 nanobelt nanodevice, the nanobelts are assembled on a pair of Au electrodes by electric-field assembly method . The SnO2 nanobelts were ultrasonically dispersed in ethanol, and then the dispersed SnO2 nanobelts were deposited on predefined Au electrodes using the electric-field assembly technique. After applying a droplet of the SnO2 nanobelt suspension onto the electrodes, the electrodes were connected to a 10 V and 50-kHz AC signal, which was chosen for optimizing the alignment of a single nanobelt. This signal generated an alternating electrostatic force on the nanobelts in the solution. Under the electrical polarization force, the nanobelts were deposited on the electrodes.
Results and discussion
where S is the contact area associated with Schottky barrier, J is the current density through Schottky barrier, V is the applied revere bias, q is the unit charge of an electron, K B is the Boltzmann's constant, E 0 is a parameter that depends on the carriers' density, J s is a slowly varying function of applied bias. Equation 1 indicates that the logarithmic of the current is linear with reverse bias. The log-scale plots of positive and negative current are shown in Figure 3c. We can see that lnI is linear with V in the intermediate bias range for both positive and negative current, which shows the typical I-V characteristic of back-to-back Schottky barriers structure. We can also find that in Eq. (1), the current value is related to contact area of the Schottky barrier. For the contact area of Au tip and SnO2, it is much smaller than the metal electrode due to the nanometer scale resolving of the AFM tip, which may be the main reason for the asymmetric I-V curve made on the nanobelt surface. Therefore the nonlinear and rectifying behavior in our I-V curve resulted from the Schottky contact between AFM tip/SnO2 nanobelt/electrode and the Schottky barriers may be related to the surface states on the nanobelt surface.
We have demonstrated that the Schottky barriers between CuO nanowires and metallic electrodes are dominated by the surface states on the semiconductor nanowires surface, and the conductive atomic force microscopy current maps showed the current varied with the surface states of the nanowire . Thus the surface states are widely existing phenomena for semiconductor nanobelts or nanowires. Here, the SnO2 nanobelts have some defect areas in its preparation process. So oxygen vacancies and the defect on the nanobelt would serve as surface states and impact the transport property of the nanobelt. According to the I-V curves analysis above, Schottky barrier junction is formed between the tip of AFM and the nanobelt surface. In this structure, the current is dominated by the tunneling current of reverse-biased Schottky barrier. And the tunneling current is dominated by the surface states on the nanobelt surface. That is to say, the current images of the SnO2 nanobelt is caused by the surface states which result from the oxygen vacancies and the defect on the nanobelt that we can analyze from the surface geography of Figure 4a. Thus the low- and high-current flow through the nanobelt will happened and can be visualized as stripe patterns in our current maps. Through the second scan of the same area under the same bias, lowered current images are obtained. The large current is decreased with repeated scan at the same area on the nanobelt surface just as Figure 4c showed. In C-AFM scans, the bias voltage is applied on the nanobelt surface, and electron is injected from the AFM tip through the depletion layer into the nanobelt. Here, the surface states tend to trap electrons further and widen the depletion layer which leads to the decrease in electron mobility as well as a decrease in the current value in the same area on the nanobelt surface. The surface states trap charge carriers in the first scan of C-AFM at -4.0 bias voltages and enhance the barrier height on the nanobelt surface, when the same bias voltage is add on the nanobelt again decreased currents image will be obtained.
The photocurrent maps are also carried out at the same bias voltage values by our photo-assisted AFM techniques with an UV light source (λ = 350 nm, average power of 8 mW) , but the current values have no obvious changes, the varied value only are several picoamperes. The surface states tend to extract electrons from SnO2 which can form a depletion of the charge carriers in the nanobelt. The depletion layer which is caused by the surface states can affect the conducting property of the nanobelt. Also, the depletion regions in the nanobelt can act as obstacles that hinder the electron transfer from the nanobelt to the electrode and increase the turn-on voltage of the nanobelt devices. Usually, the surface states can be modified by the exciting UV light. The UV photons can release of the trapped electrons back into the depletion region, gradually reducing the band bending. Since the nanobelts have a greater number of oxygen vacancies, the depletion region and surface field is larger, the effect of UV light is not as strong as make photocurrent changes in our current images. Surface states as the charge trapping effect in nanometer scale must be cared in nano-electronic device fabricated in the future. Thus, the electronic transport property of single nanobelt nanodevices is directly studied by correlating the microscopy with separate device measurement together. Current maps show us clearly the transport property of the nanobelt at nanometer scales.
In conclusion, the electronic transport property of single SnO2 nanobelt was studied by conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM). Back-to-back Schottky barrier-type junctions were created between AFM tip/SnO2 nanobelt/electrode which reasoning from the I-V curve made on the nanobelt. The current images of single SnO2 nanobelt nanodevices were also studied by C-AFM techniques, which showed stripes patterns on the nanobelt surface. The results showed that the surface states can affect the transport property of the nanobelt device and display stripe patterns in the current images. The electronic transport property of single SnO2 nanodevices affect by the surface states can be important for constructing nanosensors and other nanodevices based on SnO2 nanobelt in nanometer scales in future.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10874040, 60906056), and the Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project, Ministry of Education of China (No. 708062). Fund of Science and Technology Department (No. 102300413223) and Education department (No. 2009A140001) of Henan Province.
- Korotcenkov G, Han SD, Cho BK, Brinzari V: Grain size effects in sensor response of nanostructured SnO 2 -and In 2 O 3 -based conductometric thin film gas sensor. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 2009, 34: 1–17. 10.1080/10408430902815725View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurlo A: Nanosensors: towards morphological control of gas sensing activity. SnO 2 , In 2 O 3 , ZnO and WO 3 case studies. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 154–165. 10.1039/c0nr00560fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bueno PR, Varela JA, Longo E: SnO 2 , ZnO and related polycrystalline compound semiconductors: an overview and review on the voltage-dependent resistance (non-ohmic) feature. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008, 28: 505–529. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.06.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Batzill M: Surface science studies of gas sensing materials: SnO 2 . Sensors 2006, 6: 1345–1366. 10.3390/s6101345View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan ZW, Dai ZR, Wang ZL: Nanobelts of semiconducting oxides. Science 2001, 291: 1947–1949. 10.1126/science.1058120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dai ZR, Gole JL, Stout JD, Wang ZL: Tin oxide nanowires, nanoribbons, and nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 2002, 106: 1274–1279. 10.1021/jp013214rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li QH, Chen YJ, Wan Q, Wang TH: Thin film transistors fabricated by in situ growth of SnO 2 nanobelts on Au/Pt electrodes. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 1805–807. 10.1063/1.1789232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji X, Huang X, Liu J, Jiang J, Li X, Ding R, Hu Y, Wu F, Li Q: Carbon-coated SnO 2 nanorod array for lithium-ion battery anode material. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 649–653. 10.1007/s11671-010-9529-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han JH, Yoon DY: 3D CFD for chemical transport profiles in a rotating disk CVD reactor. 3D Research 2010, 02: 26–30.Google Scholar
- Kar A, Stroscio MA, Dutta M, Kumari J, Meyyappan M: Observation of ultraviolet emission and effect of surface states on the luminescence from tin oxide nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 101905. 10.1063/1.3097011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen HT, Xiong SJ, Wu XL, Zhu J, Shen JC: Tin oxide nanoribbons with vacancy structures in luminescence-sensitive oxygen sensing. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 1926–1931. 10.1021/nl900075fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yaish Y, Park JY, Rosenblatt S, Sazonova V, Brink M, McEuen PL: Electrical nanoprobing of semiconducting carbon nanotubes using an atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 2004, 92: 046401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka I, Kamiya I, Sakaki H, Qureshi N, Allen SJ Jr, Petroff PM: Imaging and probing electronic properties of self-assembled InAs quantum dots by atomic force microscopy with conductive tip. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 74: 6.Google Scholar
- Wang SJ, Zhang XT, Cheng G, Jiang XH, Li YC, Huang YB, Du Z: Study on electronic transport properties of WO 3 /TiO 2 nanocrystalline thin films by photoassisted conductive atomic force microscopy. Chem Phys Lett 2005, 405: 63–67. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiorenza P, Nigro RL, Raineri V: Scanning probe microscopy on heterogeneous CaCu 3 Ti 4 O 12 thin films. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 118. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-García B, Zúñiga-Pérez J, Muñoz-Sanjosé V, Colchero J, Palacios-Lidón E: Formation and rupture of Schottky nanocontacts on ZnO nanocolumns. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 1505. 10.1021/nl070238mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azulay D, Millo O, Silbert S, Balberg I, Naghavi N: Where does photocurrent flow in polycrystalline CdS? Appl Phys Lett 2005, 86: 212102. 10.1063/1.1923157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Mitani Y: Structural and electrical evolution of gate dielectric breakdown observed by conductive atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 032906. 10.1063/1.2166679View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu YL, Chung JH, Liu WK, Ruoff RS: Dielectrophoretic assembly of nanowires. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 14098–14106. 10.1021/jp061367eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu JQ, Ma XL, Shang NG, Xie ZY, Wong NB, Lee CS, Lee ST: Large-scale rapid oxidation synthesis of SnO2 nanoribbons. J Phys Chem B 2002, 106: 3823–3826. 10.1021/jp0125552View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Z, Yang YL, Chen F, Qing Q, Wu ZY, Liu ZF: Controllable interconnection of single-walled carbon nanotubes under AC electric field. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109: 11420–11423. 10.1021/jp051848iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez-Ramirez F, Tarancon A, Casals O, Pellicer E, Rodriguez J, Romano-Rodriguez A, Morante JR, Barth S, Mathur S: Electrical properties of individual tin oxide nanowires contacted to platinum electrodes. Phys Rev B 2007, 76: 085429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Padovani FA, Stratton R: Field and thermionic-field emission in Schottky barriers. Solid-State Electron 1966, 9: 695–707. 10.1016/0038-1101(66)90097-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stratakis E, Misra N, Spanakis E, Hwang DJ, Grigoropoulos CP, Fotakis C, Tzanetakis P: Imaging dielectric properties of Si nanowire oxide with conductive atomic force microscopy complemented with femtosecond laser illumination. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 1949–1953. 10.1021/nl0807171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng G, Wang SJ, Cheng K, Jiang XH, Wang LX, Li LS, Du ZL, Zou GT: The current image of a single CuO nanowire studied by conductive atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 223116. 10.1063/1.2938694View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.