# Mass spectrometry based on a coupled Cooper-pair box and nanomechanical resonator system

- Cheng Jiang
^{1}, - Bin Chen
^{1}, - Jin-Jin Li
^{1}and - Ka-Di Zhu
^{1}Email author

**6**:570

https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-570

© Jiang et al; licensee Springer. 2011

**Received: **20 August 2011

**Accepted: **31 October 2011

**Published: **31 October 2011

## Abstract

Nanomechanical resonators (NRs) with very high frequency have a great potential formass sensing with unprecedented sensitivity. In this study, we propose a scheme formass sensing based on the NR capacitively coupled to a Cooper-pair box (CPB) drivenby two microwave currents. The accreted mass landing on the resonator can be measuredconveniently by tracking the resonance frequency shifts because of mass changes inthe signal absorption spectrum. We demonstrate that frequency shifts induced byadsorption of ten 1587 bp DNA molecules can be well resolved in the absorptionspectrum. Integration with the CPB enables capacitive readout of the mechanicalresonance directly on the chip.

## 1 Introduction

Nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) offer new prospects for a variety of importantapplications ranging from semiconductor-based technology to fundamental science [1]. In particular, the minuscule masses of NEMS resonators, combined with theirhigh frequencies and high resonance quality factors, are very appealing for mass sensing [2–7]. These NEMS-based mass sensing employs tracking the resonance frequencyshifts of the resonators due to mass changes. The most frequently used techniques formeasuring the resonance frequency are based on optical detection [8]. Though inherently simple and highly sensitive, this technique is susceptibleto temperature fluctuation noise because it usually generates heat and heat conduction.On the other hand, it has experimentally been demonstrated that capacitive detection isless affected to noise than optical detection in ambient atmosphere [9]. Capacitive detection is realized by connecting NEMS resonator with standardmicroelectronics, such as complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuitry [10]. Here, we propose a scheme for mass sensing based on a coupled nanomechanicalresonator (NR)-Cooper-pair box (CPB) system.

The basic superconducting CPB consists of a low-capacitance superconducting electrodeweakly linked to a superconducting reservoir by a Josephson tunnel junction. Owing toits controllability [11–14], a CPB has been proposed to couple to the NR to drive an NR into asuperposition of spatially separated states and probe the decay of the NR [15], to prepare the NR in a Fock state and perform a quantum non-demolitionmeasurement of the Fock state [16], and to cool the NR to its ground state [17]. Recently, this coupled CPB-NR system has been realized in experiments [18, 19] and the resonance frequency shifts of the NR could be monitored by performingmicrowave (MW) spectroscopy measurement. Based on the above-mentioned achievements, inthis article, we investigate the signal absorption spectrum of the CPB qubitcapacitively coupled to an NR in the simultaneous presence of a strong control MWcurrent and a weak signal MW current. Theoretical analysis shows that two sideband peaksappear at the signal absorption spectrum, which exactly correspond to the resonancefrequency of the NR. Therefore, the accreted mass landing on the NR can be weighedprecisely by measuring the frequency shifts because of mass changes of the NR in thesignal absorption spectrum. Similar mass sensing scheme has been proposed recently in ahybrid nanocrystal coupled to an NR by our group [20], which is based on a theoretical model. However, recent experimentalachievements in the coupled CPB-NR system [18, 19] make it possible for our proposed mass sensing scheme here to be realized infuture.

## 2 Model and theory

*I*

_{ b }is also applied to the MW line to control the magnetic fluxthrough the SQUID loop and thus the effective Josephson coupling of the CPB qubit. TheHamiltonian of our coupled CPB-NR system reads:

*H*

_{CPB}is the Hamiltonian of the CPB qubit described by thepseudospin -1/2 operators

*σ*

_{ z }and

*σ*

_{ x }=

*σ*

_{+}+

*σ*

_{-}.

*ω*

_{q}= 4

*E*

_{c}(2

*n*

_{g}- 1)/

*ħ*is theelectrostatic energy difference and

*E*

_{J0}is the maximum Josephsonenergy. Here,

*E*

_{C}=

*e*

^{2}/2

*C*

_{ Σ }is the charging energy with

*C*

_{ Σ }=

*C*

_{b}+

*C*

_{g}+ 2

*C*

_{J}being the CPB island's totalcapacitance and

*n*

_{ g }= (

*C*

_{b}

*V*

_{b}+

*C*

_{g}

*V*

_{g})/(2

*e*) is the dimensionlesspolarization charge (in units of Cooper pairs), where

*C*

_{b}and

*V*

_{b}are, respectively, the capacitance and voltage between the NRand the CPB island,

*C*

_{g}and

*V*

_{g}are, respectively,the gate capacitance and voltage of the CPB qubit, and

*C*

_{J}is thecapacitance of each Josephson junction. Displacement (by

*x*) of the NR leads tolinear modulation of the capacitance between NR and CPB,

*C*

_{b}(

*x*) ≈

*C*

_{b}(0) +(∂

*C*

_{b}/∂

*x*)

*x*, which modulates theelectrostatic energy of the CPB qubit, resulting in the capacitive coupling constant$\lambda =\frac{4{n}_{\mathsf{\text{g}}}^{\mathsf{\text{NR}}}{E}_{\mathsf{\text{C}}}}{\hslash}\frac{1}{{C}_{\mathsf{\text{b}}}}\frac{\partial {C}_{\mathsf{\text{b}}}}{\partial x}\Delta {x}_{zp}$, where ${n}_{\mathsf{\text{g}}}^{\mathsf{\text{NR}}}={C}_{\mathsf{\text{b}}}{V}_{\mathsf{\text{b}}}\u22152e$ and $\Delta {x}_{zp}=\sqrt{\hslash \u22152m{\omega}_{n}}$ is the zero-point uncertainty of the NR with effectivemass

*m*and resonance frequency

*ω*

_{ n }. The couplingbetween the MW line and the CPB qubit in the second term of Equation 2 results from thetotally externally applied magnetic flux

*Φ*

_{ x }(

*t*) =

*Φ*

_{q}(

*t*) +

*Φ*

_{b}through the CPBqubit loop of an effective area

*S*with

*Φ*

_{0}=

*h*/(2

*e*) being the flux quantum. Here,

*Φ*

_{q}(

*t*) =

*μ*

_{0}

*SI*(

*t*)/(2

*πr*), with

*r*being the distance between the MW line and the qubit and

*μ*

_{0}being the vacuum permeability.

*Φ*

_{q}(

*t*) and

*Φ*

_{b}are controlled, respectively, by the MW current$I\left(t\right)={\mathcal{E}}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}\mathsf{\text{cos}}\left({\omega}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}t\right)+{\mathcal{E}}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}\mathsf{\text{cos}}\left({\omega}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}t+{\delta}^{\prime}\right)$ and the direct current

*I*

_{b}in the MWline. For convenience, we assume the phase factor

*δ'*= 0 because it is notdifficult to demonstrate that the results of this article are not dependent on the valueof

*δ'*. By adjusting the direct current

*I*

_{b}and the MWcurrent

*I*(

*t*) such that

*Φ*

_{b}≫

*Φ*

_{q}(

*t*) and

*πΦ*

_{b}/

*Φ*

_{0}=

*π*/2,we can obtain ${E}_{\mathsf{\text{J}}}\mathsf{\text{cos}}\left[\frac{\pi {\Phi}_{x}\left(t\right)}{{\Phi}_{0}}\right]\approx -{E}_{\mathsf{\text{J}}}\frac{\pi {\Phi}_{\mathsf{\text{q}}}\left(t\right)}{{\Phi}_{0}}.$ In a rotating frame at the control frequency

*ω*

_{c}, the total Hamiltonian can now be written as

where *Δ* = *ω*
_{q} - *ω*
_{c} is thedetuning of the qubit resonance frequency and the control current frequency, *δ* = *ω*
_{s} - *ω*
_{c} is the detuning of thesignal current and the control current, *μ* =*μ*
_{0}
*SE*
_{J0}/(8*rΦ*
_{0})is the effective 'electric dipole moment' of the qubit, and $\Omega =\mu {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}\u2215\hslash $ is the effective 'Rabi frequency' of the controlcurrent.

*ρ*is the density matrix of the coupled system,

*T*

_{1}is the qubit relaxation time,

*τ*

_{ ϕ }is the qubit puredephasing time, and

*γ*is the decay rate of the NR which is given by

*γ*=

*ω*

_{ n }/

*Q*. $\mathcal{L}\left[D\right]$, describing the incoherent decays, is the Lindbladoperator for an operator and is given by:

*O*and a density matrix

*ρ*in Equation 6, we obtain the following Bloch equations for the coupled CPB-NRsystem:

*T*

_{2}is the qubit dephasing timesatisfying

*T*

_{2}= 2

*T*

_{1}. Inorder to solve the above equations, we first take the semiclassical approach byfactorizing the NR and CPB qubit degrees of freedom, i.e.,〈

*Qσ*

_{-}〉 = 〈

*Q*〉〈

*σ*

_{-}〉, which ignores any entanglement betweenthese systems. For simplicity, we define

*p*=

*μσ*

_{-},

*k*=

*σ*

_{ z }and then we have

*p*(

*t*)〉 =

*p*

_{0}+

*p*

_{1}

*e*

^{-iδt }+

*p*

_{-1}

*e*

^{ iδt },〈

*k*(

*t*)〉 =

*k*

_{0}+

*k*

_{1}

*e*

^{-iδt }+

*k*

_{-1}

*e*

^{ iδt }, and〈

*Q*(

*t*)〉 =

*Q*

_{0}+

*Q*

_{1}

*e*

^{-iδt }+

*Q*

_{-1}

*e*

^{ iδt }[22]. Upon substituting these equations into Equations 12-14 and upon working tothe lowest order in ${\mathcal{E}}_{s}$ but to all orders in ${\mathcal{E}}_{c}$, we obtain in the steady state:

*ω*

_{0}=

*ω*

_{ r }

*T*

_{2},

*γ*

_{0}=

*γT*

_{2},

*Ω*

_{ c }=

*ΔT*

_{2}, and

*Δ*

_{ c }=

*ΔT*

_{2}are introduced for convenience and the auxiliaryfunction

*k*

_{0}of the CPB is determined by

*p*

_{1}is a parameter corresponding to the linear susceptibility${\chi}^{\left(1\right)}\left({\omega}_{s}\right)={p}_{1}\u2215{\mathcal{E}}_{s}=\left({\mu}^{2}{T}_{2}\u2215\hslash \right)\chi \left({\omega}_{s}\right)$, where the dimensionless linear susceptibility

*χ*(

*ω*

_{ s }) is given by

The real and imaginary parts of *χ*(*ω*
_{
s
})characterize, respectively, the dispersive and absorptive properties.

*m*

_{eff}, a spring constant

*k*, and a mechanicalresonance frequency ${\omega}_{n}=\sqrt{k\u2215{m}_{\mathsf{\text{eff}}}}$. When a particle adsorbs to the resonator andsignificantly increases the resonator's effective mass, therefore, the mechanicalresonance frequency reduces. Mass sensing is based on monitoring the frequency shift

*Δω*of

*ω*

_{ n }induced by the adsorption to theresonator. The relationship between

*Δω*with the deposited mass

*Δm*is given by

where $\mathcal{R}={\left(-2{m}_{\mathsf{\text{eff}}}\u2215{\omega}_{n}\right)}^{-1}$ is defined as the mass responsivity. However, themeasurement techniques are rather challenging. For example, electrical measurement isunsuitable for mass detections based on very high frequency NRs because of the generatedheat effect [24]. For optical detection, as device dimensions are scaled far below thedetection wavelength, diffraction effects become pronounced and will limit thesensitivity of this approach [25]. Moreover, in any actual implementation, frequency stability of the measuringsystem as well as various noise sources, including thermomechanical noise generated bythe internal loss mechanisms in the resonator and Nyquist-Johnson noise from the readoutcircuitry [3, 26] will also impose limits to the sensitivity of measurement. Here, we candetermine the frequency shifts with high precision by the MW spectroscopy measurementbased on our coupled CPB-NR system.

## 3 Numerical results and discussion

In what follows, we choose the realistically reasonable parameters to demonstrate thevalidity of mass sensing based on the coupled CPB-NR system. Typical parameters of theCPB (charge qubit) are *E*
_{C}/*ħ* = 40 GHz and*E*
_{J0}/*ħ* = 4 GHz such that *E*
_{C} ≫ *E*
_{J} [27]. Experiments by many researchers have demonstrated CPB eigenstates withexcited state lifetime of up to 2 *μ* s and coherence times of asuperpositions states as long as 0.5 *μ* s, i.e., *T*
_{1} =2*μ* s, and *T*
_{2} = 0.5 *μ* s [13, 28, 29]. NR with resonance frequency *ω*
_{
n
} = 2*π* × 133 MHz, quality factor *Q* = 5000, and effective mass*m*
_{eff} = 73 fg has been used for zeptogram-scale mass sensing [5]. Besides, coupling constant *λ* between the CPB and NR can bechosen as *λ* = 0.1*ω*
_{
n
} = 2*π* ×13.3 MHz [16]. We assume *S* = 1 *μ* m^{2}, *r* = 10*μ* m, and ${\mathcal{E}}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}=200\mu \mathsf{\text{A}}$[30], therefore, we can obtain *μ*/*ħ* =*μ*
_{0}
*SE*
_{J0}/(8*ħrϕ*
_{0})≈ 30 GHzA^{-1} and ${\Omega}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}=\Omega {T}_{2}=\left(\mu \u2215\hslash \right){\mathcal{E}}_{\mathsf{\text{c}}}{T}_{2}=3$. The experiments of our proposed mass sensing schemeshould be done *in situ* within a cryogenically cooled, ultrahigh vacuumapparatus with base pressure below 10^{-10} Torr.

*Δ*

_{ s }(

*Δ*

_{ s }=

*ω*

_{ s }-

*ω*

_{ q }). The absorption (Im(

*χ*)) has beennormalized with its maximum when the control current is resonant with the CPB qubit(

*Δ*

_{ c }= 0). Mollow triplet, commonly known in atomic andsome artificial two-level system [31, 32], appears in the middle part of Figure 2a. However,there are also two sharp peaks located exactly at

*Δ*

_{ s }=±

*ω*

_{ n }in the sidebands of the absorption spectrum,which corresponds to the resonant absorption and amplification of the vibrational modeof the NR. Our proposed mass sensing scheme is just based on these new features in theabsorption spectrum. An intuitive physical picture explaining these peaks can be givenin the energy level diagram shown in Figure 2b. The Hamiltonian ofthe coupled system without the externally applied current can be diagonalized [33, 34] in the eigenbasis of $|\pm ,{N}_{\pm}\u3009=\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}|\pm {\u3009}_{z}\otimes {e}^{\mp (\lambda /{\omega}_{n})({a}^{\u2020}-a)}|N\u3009$, with the eigenenergies

*E*

_{±}=±

*ħ*/2

*ω*

_{ q }+

*ħω*

_{ n }(

*N*-

*λ*

_{0}), wherethe CPB qubit states |±〉

_{ z }are eigenstates of

*σ*

_{ z }with the excited state |+〉

_{ z }= |

*e*〉 and the ground state |-〉

_{ z }=|

*g*〉, the resonator states |

*N*

_{±}〉 areposition-displaced Fock states. Transitions between |-,

*N*

_{-}〉and |+, (

*N*+ 1)

_{+}〉 represent signal absorption centered at

*ω*

_{ c }+

*ω*

_{ n }(the rightmost solidline in Figure 2b). Besides, transitions between |+,

*N*

_{+}〉 and |-, (

*N*+ 1)

_{-}〉 indicateprobe amplification (the leftmost solid line in Figure 2b) becauseof a three-photon process, involving simultaneous absorption of two control photons andemission of a photon at frequency

*ω*

_{ c }-

*ω*

_{ n }. The middle dashed lines in Figure 2a corresponds to the transition where the signal frequency is equal to thecontrol frequency. Therefore, Figure 2a provides a method tomeasure the resonance frequency of the NR. If we first tune the frequency of the controlMW current to be resonant with the CPB qubit (

*ω*

_{ c }=

*ω*

_{ q }) and scan the signal frequency across the CPB qubitfrequency, then we can easily obtain the resonance frequency of the NR from the signalabsorption spectrum.

*m*

_{DNA}≈ 1659 zg (1 zg = 10

^{-21}g) [35], and assume for simplicity that the mass adds uniformly to the mass of theoverall NR and changes the resonance frequency of the NR by an amount given by Equation19. Figure 2c demonstrates the signal absorption as a function of

*Δ*

_{ s }before and after a binding event of ~ 10functionalized 1587 bp DNA molecules in the vicinity of the resonance frequency of theNR. We can see clearly that there is a resonance frequency shift

*Δω*=-95 kHz after the adsorption of the DNA molecules because of the increased mass of theNR. According to Equation 19, we can obtain the mass of the accreted DNA molecule:$\Delta m=-\frac{2{m}_{\mathsf{\text{eff}}}}{{\omega}_{n}}\Delta \omega =16590\mathsf{\text{zg}}$, about the mass of 10 functionalized 1587 bp long dsDNAmolecules. Therefore, such a coupled CPB-NR system can be used to weigh the externalaccreted mass landing on the NR by measuring the frequency shift in the signalabsorption spectrum when the control current is resonant with the CPB qubit. Plot offrequency shifts versus the number of DNA molecules landing on two different masses ofNRs. Other parameters used are

*ω*

_{ n }= 835 MHz,

*λ*

_{0}= 0.01,

*Δ*

_{c}= 0,

*Q*=5000,

*T*

_{1}= 0.25

*μ*s,

*T*

_{2}= 0.05

*μ*s, and

*Ω*

_{ c }= 3. Mass responsivity$\mathcal{R}$ is an important parameter to evaluate the performance of aresonator for mass sensing. Figure 3 plots the frequency shifts asa function of the number of DNA molecules landing on the NR for two different kinds ofNRs. One is

*ω*

_{ n }= 2

*π*× 133 MHz(

*m*

_{eff}= 73 fg), the other is

*ω*

_{ n }=2

*π*× 190 MHz (

*m*

_{eff}= 96 fg) [2, 3]. The mass responsivities, which can be obtained from the slope of the line,are, respectively, $\left|\mathcal{R}\right|\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\approx 5.72\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{Hz/zg}}$ and $\left|\mathcal{R}\right|\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\approx 6.21\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{Hz/zg}}$. Smaller mass of the nanoresonator enables higher massresponsivity. Here, we have assumed that the DNA molecules land evenly on the NR andthey remain on it. In fact, the position on the surface of the resonator where thebinding takes place is one factor that strongly affects the resonance frequency shift.The maximization in mass responsivity is obtained if the landing takes places at theposition where the resonator's vibrational amplitude is maximum. For the doubly clampedNR used in our model, maximum shift is achieved at the center for the fundamental modeof vibration, while the minimum shift exists at the clamping points. This statisticaldistribution of frequency shifts has been investigated by building the histogram ofevent probability versus frequency shift for small ensembles of sequential singlemolecule or single nanoparticle adsorption events [6, 7].

*ω*

_{s}=

*ω*

_{q}a bit, as shown in Figure 4b. Thisis because of the coupling

*λ*

_{0}between the CPB and the NR [16, 36]. Figure 4c demonstrates the absorption spectrum of thesignal field when the control field turns on in the absence of the NR (coupling off).This is the commonly known Mollow triplet, which appears in atomic and some artificialtwo-level system [31, 32]. None of the above situations can be used to measure the resonance frequencyof the NR. However, when the coupled CPB-NR system is driven by a strong control fieldand a weak signal field simultaneously, the resonance frequency of the NR be measuredfrom the absorption spectrum of the signal field, as shown in Figure 4d. The spectral linewidth of the two sideband peaks that corresponds to theresonance frequency of the NR is much narrower than the peak in the center, since thedamping rate of the NR is much smaller than the decay rate of the CPB qubit. Therefore,such a coupled CPB-NR system is proposed here to measure the resonance frequency of theNR when the control field is resonant with the CPB qubit (

*ω*

_{ c }=

*ω*

_{ q }). By measuring the frequency shift of the NR beforeand after the adsorption of particles landing on it, we can obtain the accreted massaccording to Equation 19.

## 4 Conclusion

To conclude, we have demonstrated that the coupled NR-CPB system driven by two MWcurrents can be employed as a mass sensor. In this coupled system, the CPB serves as anauxiliary system to read out the resonance frequency of the NR. Therefore, the accretedmass landing on the NR can be weighed conveniently by measuring the frequency shifts inthe signal absorption spectrum. In addition, the use of on-chip capacitive readout willprove especially advantageous for detection in liquid environments of low or arbitrarilyvarying optical transparency, as well as for operation at cryogenic temperatures, wheremaintenance of precise optical component alignment becomes difficult.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (Nos. 10774101 and 10974133) and the National Ministry ofEducation Program for Training Ph.D.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Roukes ML: Nanoelectromechanical systems face the future.
*Phys World*2001, 14: 25.Google Scholar - Ekinci KL, Huang XM, Roukes ML: Ultrasensitive nanoelectromechanical mass detection.
*Appl Phys Lett*2004, 84: 4469. 10.1063/1.1755417View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ekinci KL, Tang YT, Roukes ML: Ultimate limits to inertial mass sensing based upon nanoelectromechanicalsystems.
*J Appl Phys*2004, 95: 2682. 10.1063/1.1642738View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Llic B, Craighead HG, Krylov S, Senaratne W, Ober C, Neuzil P: Attogram detection using nanoelectromechanical oscillators.
*J Appl Phys*2004, 95: 3694. 10.1063/1.1650542View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yang YT, Callegari C, Feng XL, Ekinci KL, Roukes ML: Zeptogram-scale nanomechanical mass sensing.
*Nano Lett*2006, 6: 583. 10.1021/nl052134mView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jensen K, Kim K, Zettl A: An atomic-resolution nanomechanical mass sensor.
*Nat Nanotechnol*2008, 3: 533. 10.1038/nnano.2008.200View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Naik AK, Hanay MS, Hiebert WK, Feng XL, Roukes ML: Towards single-molecule nanomechanical mass spectrometry.
*Nat Nanotechnol*2009, 4: 445. 10.1038/nnano.2009.152View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wiesendanger R:
*Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy*. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Kim SJ, Ono T, Esashi M: Capacitive resonant mass sensor with frequency demodulation detection based onresonant circuit.
*Appl Phys Lett*2006, 88: 053116. 10.1063/1.2171650View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Forsen E, Abadal G, Nilsson SG, Teva J, Verd J, Sandberg R, Svendsen W, Murano FP, Esteve J, Figueras E, Campabadal F, Montelius L, Barniol N, Boisen A: Ultrasensitive mass sensor fully integrated with complementarymetal-oxide-semiconductor circuitry.
*Appl Phys Lett*2005, 87: 043507. 10.1063/1.1999838View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Nakamura Y, Pashkin YA, Tsai JS: Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box.
*Nature*1999, 398: 786. 10.1038/19718View ArticleGoogle Scholar - You JQ, Nori F: Superconducting circuits and quantum information.
*Phys Today*2005, 58: 42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Clarke J, Wilhelm FK: Superconducting quantum bits.
*Nature*2008, 453: 1031. 10.1038/nature07128View ArticleGoogle Scholar - You JQ, Nori F: Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits.
*Nature*2011, 474: 589. 10.1038/nature10122View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Armour AD, Blencow MP, Schwab KC: Entanglement and decoherence of a micromechanical resonator via coupling to aCooper-pair box.
*Phys Rev Lett*2002, 88: 148301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Irish EK, Schwab K: Quantum measurement of a coupled nanomechanical resonator-Cooper-pair boxsystem.
*Phys Rev B*2003, 68: 155311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhang P, Wang YD, Sun CP: Cooling mechanism for a nanomechanical resonator by periodic coupling to aCooper-pair box.
*Phys Rev Lett*2005, 95: 097204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - LaHaye MD, Suh J, Echternach PM, Schwab KC, Roukes ML: Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit.
*Nature*2009, 459: 960. 10.1038/nature08093View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Suh J, LaHaye MD, Echternach PM, Schwab KC, Roukes ML: Parametric amplification and back-action noise squeezing by a qubit-couplednanoresonator.
*Nano Lett*2010, 10: 3990. 10.1021/nl101844rView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li JJ, Zhu KD: Plasmon-assisted mass sensing in a hybrid nanocrystal coupled to a nanomechanicalresonator.
*Phys Rev B*2011, 83: 245421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gardiner CW, Zoller P:
*Quantum Noise*. 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Boyd RW:
*Nonlinear Optics*. San Diego, CA: Academic; 2008.Google Scholar - Yuan XZ, Goan HS, Lin CH, Zhu KD, Jiang YW: Nanomechanical-resonator-assisted induced transparency in a Cooper-pair boxsystem.
*New J Phys*2008, 10: 095016. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/9/095016View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ekinci KL, Roukes ML: Nanoelectromechanical systems.
*Rev Sci Instrum*2005, 76: 061101. 10.1063/1.1927327View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Li M, Tang HX, Roukes ML: Ultra-sensitive NEMS-based cantilevers for sensing, scanned probe and veryhigh-frequency applications.
*Nat Naonotechnol*2007, 2: 114. 10.1038/nnano.2006.208View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cleland AN, Roukes ML: Noise processes in nanomechanical resonators.
*J Appl Phys*2002, 92: 2758. 10.1063/1.1499745View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rabl P, Shnirman A, Zoller P: Generation of squeezed states of nanomechanical resonators by reservoirengineering.
*Phys Rev B*2004, 70: 205304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vion D, Aassime A, Cottet A, Joyez P, Pothier H, Urbina C, Esteve D, Devoret MH: Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit.
*Science*2002, 296: 886. 10.1126/science.1069372View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Schwab KC, Roukes ML: Putting mechanics into quantum mechanics.
*Phys Today*2005, 58: 36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sun CP, Wei LF, Liu YX, Nori F: Quantum transducers: integrating transmission lines and nanomechanical resonatorsvia charge qubits.
*Phys Rev A*2006, 73: 022318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wu FY, Ezekiel S, Ducloy M, Mollow BR: Observation of amplification in a strongly driven two-level atomic system atoptical frequencies.
*Phys Rev Lett*1977, 38: 1077. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1077View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Xu XD, Sun B, Berman PR, Steel DG, Bracker AS, Gammon D, Sham LJ: Coherent optical spectroscopy of a strongly driven quantum dot.
*Science*2007, 317: 929. 10.1126/science.1142979View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Irish EK, Gea-Banacloche J, Martin I, Schwab KC: Dynamics of a two-level system strongly coupled to a high-frequency quantumoscillator.
*Phys Rev B*2005, 72: 195410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Irish EK: Generalized rotating-wave approximation for arbitrarily large coupling.
*Phys Rev Lett*2007, 99: 173601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Llic B, Yang Y, Aubin K, Reichenbach R, Krylo S, Craighead HG: Enumeration of DNA molecules bound to a nanomechanical oscillator.
*Nano Lett*2005, 5: 925. 10.1021/nl050456kView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Wei LF, Liu YX, Sun CP, Nori F: Probing tiny motions of nanomechanicalresonators: classical or quantummechanical?
*Phys Rev Lett*2006, 97: 237201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), whichpermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited.