Open Access

Optical properties of exfoliated MoS2 coaxial nanotubes - analogues of graphene

  • Bojana Visic1Email author,
  • Robert Dominko2,
  • Marta Klanjsek Gunde2,
  • Nina Hauptman2,
  • Sreco D Skapin1 and
  • Maja Remskar1, 3
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20116:593

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-593

Received: 31 August 2011

Accepted: 15 November 2011

Published: 15 November 2011

Abstract

We report on the first exfoliation of MoS2 coaxial nanotubes. The single-layer flakes, as the result of exfoliation, represent the transition metal dichalcogenides' analogue of graphene. They show a very low degree of restacking in comparison with exfoliation of MoS2 plate-like crystals. MoS2 monolayers were investigated by means of electron and atomic force microscopies, showing their structure, and ultraviolet-visible spectrometry, revealing quantum confinement as the consequence of the nanoscale size in the z-direction.

Keywords

molybdenum disulfide nanotubes exfoliation

Background

In recent years, significant progress has been made in exfoliating graphene directly from graphite, which is supposed to produce samples with fewer defects [1]. Exfoliation of the metallic-layered compounds TaS2 [2, 3] and NbS2 [3] is known for more than 30 years. Also, preparation of a single molecular layer of MoS2 out of the crystalline 2H-MoS2 by intercalation of lithium has been reported in 1986 [4], which was the first exfoliation of a layered semiconductor, and it was followed by the exfoliation of WS2 [5]. Exfoliation via other solvents [6] and cleaving processes [7] has been reported recently. Until now, there have been no reports on the attempt to exfoliate transition-metal disulphide nanotubes.

Bulk 2H-MoS2 is made of S-Mo-S sandwich layers, where every molybdenum sheet is between two sheets of sulfur. It was found that crystalline MoS2 has three polytypes: 1T, 2H, and 3R, where the integer indicates the number of layers per unit cell and T, H, and R indicate the trigonal, hexagonal, and rhombohedral primitive unit cells, respectively. Whereas the interactions within the sandwich correspond to the chemical bonds, the neighboring layers are weakly connected with Van der Waals bonds, and foreign materials can be inserted into the Van der Waals gap, and under appropriate conditions, the layers can be further separated to form single molecular layers.

Single molecular layers of MoS2 in a water suspension have been prepared by intercalation of lithium into crystal 2H-MoS2 followed by exfoliation in water. As this aqueous suspension is aging, restacked MoS2 with two monolayers of water is formed (the water-bilayer phase), with water monolayers between parallel, but rotationally disordered MoS2 layers. For this structure, a 2a 0 × a 0 pattern was confirmed [8], where a 0 is the lattice constant of bulk 2H-MoS2. Single layer shows a change in lattice symmetry from 2H to 1T, and it is suggested that the change in coordination is electronically driven by Li electron donation to the MoS2 host [9]; this configuration is preferred because the electrons donated to the valence band in 1T configuration occupy a much lower level than the electrons donated to the conduction band of the 2H structure. It was shown that this structural transition is followed by a change in the optical absorption spectrum, where two strong absorption peaks for 2H-MoS2 are absent [10]. The structural transformation is also present in the formation of single molecular layers of WS2. Lattice constants in the basal (001) plane were found: for 2H-MoS2 crystal with a trigonal prism configuration, it is 3.162 Å; for Li-MoS2 crystal with an octahedral configuration, 3.6 Å; and for MoS2 single layer with an octahedral configuration, 3.27 Å [11].

Exfoliation of MoS2 can lead to the synthesis of many new materials, obtained by restacking the single layers with, for example, organic molecules [1214]. It was discovered that MoS2 photoluminescence increases with decreasing layer thickness, the strongest is on single layer [15], which holds promise for new nanophotonic applications, and it was also realized as a field-effect transistor [16], which can be applied in new areas of optoelectronics.

MoS2 is also known as a solid lubricant which has been used in the industry for the last 60 years. At low-humidity conditions, it is possible to obtain a low friction coefficient of 0.05 [17]. Ultra-low friction of 0.003 was reported between MoS2 flakes and MoS2 surfaces [18]. The problem of edge oxidation and preservation of the flakes in parallel orientation with the surface with a low degree of restacking can be minimized with the reduction of thickness. It is desired to obtain the thinnest flakes possible, which can be achieved by exfoliating MoS2 coaxial nanotubes.

Methods

The MoS2 coaxial nanotubes (Nanotul Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia) are synthesized by sulfurization transformation of M6S2I8 nanowires under gas flow of H2/H2S mixture in an argon atmosphere [19]. They were dried in a dry box (glove box, < 1 ppm of H2O, M.Braun Garching, Germany) for at least 6 h in vacuum at 120°C, then suspended in a solution of 2.5 M butyllithium in hexanes (0.693 g/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), where it was left for 3 days. Exfoliation occurs by immersing the lithium-intercalated compounds in water after taking them out of the dry box, which provides a water-bilayer phase of MoS2. To obtain single layers of MoS2 in water suspension, the material was washed repeatedly with distilled water and centrifuged. The reaction that occurs between the water and intercalated lithium results in hydrogen gas release and lithium hydroxide formation. The washing process reduces lithium concentration (from a pH of 12 to 7). Consequently, the water-bilayer phase, which is stable in a higher pH [5], splits into single MoS2 layers.

The exfoliated material was characterized by scanning electron microscopy [SEM], transmission electron microscopy [TEM], atomic probe techniques (atomic force microscopy [AFM] and STM), and X-ray diffraction [XRD]. The XRD spectra were recorded with an AXS D4 Endeavor diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany), with Cu Kα1 radiation and a SOL-X energy-dispersive detector with the angular range of 2θ from 5° to 75° with a step size of 0.04° and a collection time of 3 to 4 s.

The process of exfoliation was elucidated by ultraviolet-visible [UV-Vis] spectroscopy. The spectra were recorded in a 10-mm-path length quartz cell on an Agilent 8453 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 23°C ± 1°C in a wavelength range of 180 to 1,000 nm, with a 1-nm resolution. For comparison, the PerkinElmer Lambda 950 photospectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) was used under the same conditions. All UV-Vis measurements were performed on the material in a water solution.

Results and discussion

The main reason why the nanotubes (Figure 1a) are used for exfoliation is that they already have gaps between their coaxial cylinders, as shown in Figure 1b. The nanotubes keep an outside shape of the Mo6S2I8 nanowire precursor, but the difference in mass density between the wires and MoS2 compounds leads to a creation of an empty space inside the MoS2 nanotubes that separates the adjacent cylinders and creates gaps between them [19], so it is easier to intercalate them; and the nanotube walls have a curvature, which prevents restacking.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-6-593/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Microscopy. MoS2 nanotubes before exfoliation: (a) SEM image of short parts of millimeter-long nanotubes with diameters up to 500 nm; (b) TEM image of the pristine nanotube revealing spontaneous partial splitting of the nanotube's wall into several blocks, up to 10 nm in thickness; (c) TEM micrograph of the MoS2 nanotube during the first stage of the exfoliation process; (d) TEM micrograph of the MoS2 single layers as a final stage of nanotube exfoliation; (e) AFM image (contact mode) of the surface corrugation on a thin MoS2 nanoflake with a (f) corresponding line profile.

The TEM micrographs of exfoliated MoS2 nanotubes are shown in Figures 1c, d, while the AFM image and the corresponding profile are shown in Figures 1e, f, respectively. The final product of the exfoliation process contains mainly of single-layer MoS2 flakes.

The UV-Vis absorption spectra were measured on exfoliated MoS2 nanotubes, and the comparison was made with the MoS2 coaxial nanotubes (used for exfoliation) and 2H-MoS2 plate-like powder (< 2 nm, 99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The samples were prepared in a form of dispersion in water, with concentrations showing comparable intensities of optical absorption.

Both powder and nanotube spectra (Figure 2) show the features that can be assigned to the A and B excitons, characteristic for the 2H-polytype and correspond to the smallest direct transition at the K point of the Brillouin zone (K4 → K5 and K1 → K5 transitions, respectively) [20]. The existence of the two excitons is due to the interlayer interaction and spin-orbit splitting, with the splitting value of approximately 60 nm (0.17 eV).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-6-593/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

UV-Vis spectra of the powder and nanotubes. UV-Vis absorption spectra of the (a) MoS2 powder and (b) MoS2 nanotubes.

For the MoS2 coaxial nanotubes, peak positions for A and B excitons are at 702 nm (1.77 eV) and 644 nm (1.92 eV), respectively, with the red shift of the absorption peaks compared to the powder, where their values are 692 nm (1.79 eV) and 634 nm (1.96 eV). The red shift is due to the quantum confinement, as explained by Frey et al. [21]. The excitons are separated by 60 nm for both materials, which is in good agreement with the literature [21]. Another broader peak, observed at 540 nm (2.30 eV), can be assigned to a direct transition between the states deep in the valence band to the conduction band at the M point of the Brillouin zone [20]. The strong peak at 210 nm (5.9 eV), being at the edge of the spectrometer's range, is usually disregarded from the analysis, for the wavelengths were so small, we get increased scattering, and one of the consequences is a false peak. Since the energy associated to this peak is too large to be indubitably assigned to a particular electronic transition, the nature of the peak is still inconclusive.

The change from Li-MoS2 to exfoliated MoS2 was recorded by UV-Vis absorption during a centrifugation-washing process (Figure 3). At the beginning, every vial consists of 0.5 mL of Li-MoS2, diluted with 1.5 mL of distilled water and sonicated for 5 min. The UV-Vis spectrum of the initial solution is shown in Figure 3a. Each vial was centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 rpm, and the liquid part was replaced with distilled water in order to remove the excess lithium. The process has to be repeated at least five times, during which the pH is lowered from 12 to 7, and thus, the single layers are obtained from the removed liquid. The corresponding spectrum is shown in Figure 3b.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-6-593/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_332_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Aging. Absorption spectra of MoS2 during the exfoliation process: (a) the initial sample containing Li-MoS2; (b) the completely exfoliated MoS2 nanotubes; (c) the completely exfoliated MoS2 nanotubes after 29 days.

Both the Li-MoS2 and the exfoliated MoS2 have peaks around 200 nm as well as two peaks around 300 and 400 nm (4.11 and 3.11 eV, respectively), as seen in Figure 3. There is no evidence of excitons at approximately 700 nm. We suggest that the two peaks associated with the exfoliated material are A and B excitons that exhibit a large blueshift (2.23 and 1.05 eV, respectively) due to the quantum-size confinement. To assert this claim, the effective mass treatment was applied [22]. This model is used to describe size quantization of the carriers' energy spectrum in semiconductors. In terms of the model, and in the size regime where quantum confinement effects are prominent, the shift of the absorption edge or bandgap is inversely proportional to the effective mass of the excitons:
Δ E g π 2 μ L z 2 ,

where ΔE g is the energy shift, μ is the excitons' effective mass in the direction parallel to the z-axis, and L z is the thickness of the nanoparticles in the z-direction.

For the given exciton masses, μ A = 1.28 m e and μ B = 4.10 m e [23], and energy shift obtained in our experiment, we can estimate the thickness of the sample: L z A  5 Å and L z B  4 Å . Both values are in the frame of accuracy for the MoS2 monolayer thickness [11].

The aging process of the exfoliated material was observed, as shown in Figure 3c. The main feature is that the peak at 200 nm becomes more prominent in time, but the shoulders at 300 and 400 nm remain unaltered. For the exfoliated bulk material, the evidence of restacking starts to occur in a few days with the reappearing of A and B excitons at 700 nm [11]. On the contrary, for the exfoliated nanotubes, this effect was not observed even after 3 months.

The XRD patterns of the MoS2 nanotubes, exfoliated nanotubes in a wet, paste-like form, and dry, restacked MoS2 nanolayers are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 shows the XRD spectrum of MoS2 nanotubes used for exfoliation, with the peaks indexed in accordance with the hexagonal lattice parameters after Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards card number 77-1716. The spectrum of the exfoliated material was recorded in a wet, paste-like form in order to avoid drying and restacking. The absence of the (00l) peaks suggests the majority of single layers in the sample. The (002) peak is highly asymmetric with a sawtooth shape. This effect was explained as the indication of the presence of the superlattice [8]. When the sample is dried, all of the peaks characteristic for 2H-MoS2 reappear.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-6-593/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_332_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

XRD of the nanotubes. X-ray spectrum of the MoS2 coaxial nanotubes.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-6-593/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_332_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

XRD of the exfoliated nanotubes. X-ray spectra of (a) the exfoliated MoS2 in a wet, paste-like form and (b) the material after drying.

To quantify the effective size of the particles for the nanotubes and wet, paste-like MoS2, the broadening of the XRD lines is considered by applying the Debye-Scherrer equation:
L = K λ β C o s θ ,
where L is the effective particle size, K is the shape factor, β is the XRD line broadening at half the maximum intensity given in radians, λ is the wavelength of X-rays, and θ is the scattering angle. In order to use the equation, peaks must be broadened due to crystallite size, not due to instrument optics, so the peaks that are not well resolved are not taken into account. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

The calculated effective particle size of the given reflections

Reflection

β

(rad)

Effective particle size

(nm)

 

MoS 2 nanotubes

Exfoliated MoS 2

MoS 2 nanotubes

Exfoliated MoS 2

(002)

0.01

0.08

15 ± 1

2 ± 1

(100)

-

0.02

-

7 ± 1

(103)

0.04

0.07

5 ± 1

3 ± 1

(105)

0.05

0.08

5 ± 1

3 ± 1

(110)

0.01

-

30 ± 1

-

(200)

0.03

-

15 ± 1

-

Conclusion

Exfoliated MoS2 coaxial nanotubes are produced via chemical exfoliation, resulting in single-layer flakes that are stable for months, with a low degree of restacking. Both X-ray spectra and TEM images confirm that the material is indeed composed of MoS2 monolayers. In addition, UV-Vis spectra show a strong quantum confinement effects. The relatively simple process of getting one-layer-thick MoS2 can be used to provide new types of materials with possible applications in polymer composites, photovoltaics, and nanoelectronics.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Janez Jelenc for the AFM images and Janez Kovac for the useful discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Jozef Stefan Institute
(2)
National Institute of Chemistry
(3)
Centre of Excellence Namaste

References

  1. Geim AK, Novoselov KS: The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 2007, 6: 183. 10.1038/nmat1849View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Murphy DW, Hull GW Jr: Monodispersed tantalum disulfide and adsorption complexes with cations. J Chem Phys 1975, 62: 973. 10.1063/1.430513View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu C, Singh O, Joensen P, Curzon AE, Frindt RF: X-ray and electron microscopy studies of single-layer TaS 2 and NbS 2 . Thin Solid Films 1984, 113: 165. 10.1016/0040-6090(84)90025-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Joensen P, Morrson SR: Single-layer MoS 2 . Mater Res Bull 1986, 2: 457.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yang D, Frindt RF: Li-intercalation and exfoliation of WS 2 . J Phys Chem Solids 1995, 57: 1113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman JN, et al.: Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 2011, 331: 568. 10.1126/science.1194975View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth TJ, Khotkevich VV, Morosov SV, Geim AK: Two-dimensional atomic crystals. PNAS 2005, 102: 10454. 10.1073/pnas.0504786102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Quin XR, Yang D, Frindt RF, Irwin JC: Real-space imaging of single-layer MoS2 by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys Rev B 1990, 44: 3490.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahn JR, Py MA, Haering RR: Entropy measurements on Li x TiS 2 . Can J Phys 1983, 61: 1093.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Joensen P, Crozier ED, Alberding N, Frindt RF: A study of single-layer and restacked MoS 2 by X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Phys C: Solid State Phys 1987, 20: 4043. 10.1088/0022-3719/20/26/009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang D, Jimenez Sandoval S, Divigalpitiya WMR, Frindt RF: Structure of single-molecular-layer MoS 2 . Phys Rev B 1991, 43: 24.Google Scholar
  12. Divigalpitiya WMR, Frindt FR, Morrison SR: Inclusion systems of organic molecules in restacked single-layer molybdenum disulfide. Science 1989, 246: 369. 10.1126/science.246.4928.369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou X, Yang D, Frindt RF: Study of restacked single molecular layer molybdenum disulfide with organic tetrachloroethylene included. J Phys Chem Solids 1996, 57: 1137. 10.1016/0022-3697(96)00411-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosidowski L, Powell AV: Naphthalene intercalation into molybdenum disulfide. Chem Commun 1998, 20: 2201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim CY, Galli G, Wang F: Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS 2. Nano Lett 2010, 10: 1271. 10.1021/nl903868wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A: Single-layer MoS 2 transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 2011, 6: 147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Joly-Pottuz L, Dassenoy F, Belin M, Vacher B, Martin JM, Fleischer N: Ultralow-friction and wear properties of IF-WS 2 under boundary lubrication. Tribol Let 2005, 18: 477. 10.1007/s11249-005-3607-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chhowalla M, Amaratunga GA: Thin films of fullerene-like MoS 2 nanoparticles with ultra-low friction and wear. Nature 2000, 18: 164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Remskar M, Virsek M, Mrzel A: The MoS 2 nanotube hybrids. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 133–122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Coehorn R, Haas C, Dijkstra J, Flipse CJF, Degroot RA, Wold A: Electronic structure of MoSe 2 , MoS 2 , and WSe 2 . I. Band-structure calculations and photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 1987, 35: 6195. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.6195View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey GL, Elani S, Homyonfer M, Feldman Y, Tenne R: Optical-absorption spectra of inorganic fullerenelike MS 2 (M = Mo, W). Phys Rev B 1998, 57: 6666. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6666View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoffe AD: Low-dimensional systems: quantum size effects and electronic properties of semiconductor microcrystallites (zero-dimensional systems) and some quasi-two-dimensional systems. Adv Phys 1993, 42: 173. 10.1080/00018739300101484View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans BL: Physics and chemistry of materials with layered structures. In Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography. Volume 4. Edited by: Lee PA. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1979:1.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Visic et al; licensee Springer. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.