Effect of surface properties of silica nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity and cellular distribution in murine macrophages

  • Hiromi Nabeshi1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Tomoaki Yoshikawa1, 2Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Akihiro Arimori1, 2,

        Affiliated with

        • Tokuyuki Yoshida1, 2,

          Affiliated with

          • Saeko Tochigi1, 2,

            Affiliated with

            • Toshiro Hirai1, 2,

              Affiliated with

              • Takanori Akase1, 2,

                Affiliated with

                • Kazuya Nagano2,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Yasuhiro Abe2,

                    Affiliated with

                    • Haruhiko Kamada2, 3,

                      Affiliated with

                      • Shin-ichi Tsunoda2, 4,

                        Affiliated with

                        • Norio Itoh1,

                          Affiliated with

                          • Yasuo Yoshioka2, 3 and

                            Affiliated with

                            • Yasuo Tsutsumi1, 2, 3Email author

                              Affiliated with

                              Nanoscale Research Letters20116:93

                              DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-93

                              Received: 1 October 2010

                              Accepted: 18 January 2011

                              Published: 18 January 2011


                              Surface properties are often hypothesized to be important factors in the development of safer forms of nanomaterials (NMs). However, the results obtained from studying the cellular responses to NMs are often contradictory. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the surface properties of silica nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity against a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7). The surface of the silica nanoparticles was either unmodified (nSP70) or modified with amine (nSP70-N) or carboxyl groups (nSP70-C). First, the properties of the silica nanoparticles were characterized. RAW264.7 cells were then exposed to nSP70, nSP70-N, or nSP70-C, and any cytotoxic effects were monitored by analyzing DNA synthesis. The results of this study show that nSP70-N and nSP70-C have a smaller effect on DNA synthesis activity by comparison to unmodified nSP70. Analysis of the intracellular localization of the silica nanoparticles revealed that nSP70 had penetrated into the nucleus, whereas nSP70-N and nSP70-C showed no nuclear localization. These results suggest that intracellular localization is a critical factor underlying the cytotoxicity of these silica nanoparticles. Thus, the surface properties of silica nanoparticles play an important role in determining their safety. Our results suggest that optimization of the surface characteristics of silica nanoparticles will contribute to the development of safer forms of NMs.


                              Recently, a range of nanomaterials (NMs) have been designed and used in a number of different industrial applications, such as medicine, cosmetics, and foods. The application of NMs is driven by the belief that they will offer improved performance and deliver new functionalities, including improved thermal and electrical conductivity, harder and stronger materials, improved catalytic activity, and advanced optical properties. For example, current estimates indicate that the global market for cosmetics using NMs will grow by 16.6% per year, reaching US$ 155.8 million in 2012 [1]. Hence, human exposure to NMs is already occurring and will inevitably increase in the future.

                              A NM is defined as a substance that has at least one dimension of <100 nm in size. NMs can assume many different forms, such as tubes, rods, wires, spheres, or particles. However, their small size can also be problematic in terms of eliciting a toxicological effect. For example, exposure of cells or animals to carbon nanotubes, titanium dioxide particles, or silver nanoparticles can induce cytotoxicity and inflammation [214]. We have previously shown that silica nanoparticles display a different intracellular localization compared with submicron- and micro-sized silica particles, and induce a greater cytotoxic response [15]. However, analyses of the toxicological responses to NMs are often inconsistent. Given the uncertainty concerning the safety of NMs, it is critically important to analyze their potential toxicological hazards and devise means of minimizing the impact of exposure to such substances. These studies will assist in driving forward the nanotechnology industry in the longer term by helping the researchers to protect both individuals and the environment from potentially damaging materials.

                              Some recent articles have focused on the possible influence of surface charge in terms of the cellular uptake and/or cytotoxicity of nanoparticles [1619]. Mayer et al. [19] reported the activation of the complement system and increased hemolysis in blood samples after exposure to positively charged polystyrene nanoparticles. Some recent studies suggest that cationic nanoparticles elicit a greater cytotoxicity compared with anionic nanoparticles [2022]. Taken together, these studies indicate that the surface property of nanoparticles is an important factor when developing safer forms of NMs. However, studies of cellular responses to NMs often give conflicting results. The aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxicity caused by exposure of a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7) to silica nanoparticles whose surface was either unmodified (nSP70) or modified with amine (nSP70-N) or carboxyl groups (nSP70-C). The intracellular localization of the different nanoparticles was also examined.

                              Experimental procedures

                              Silica particles

                              Fluorescent (red-F or green-F)-labeled silica particles with surfaces that were either unmodified or modified with amine or carboxyl groups (Micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH, Rostock, Germany; designated nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C, respectively) were used in this study. The silica particles, which had a diameter of 70 nm, were prepared as a suspension (25 mg/ml) and sonicated for 5 min and then vortexed for 1 min immediately prior to conducting each experiment.

                              Physicochemical examination of the nanosilica preparations

                              Nanosilicas were diluted to 0.25 mg/ml with water, and the average particle size and zeta potential were measured using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). The mean size and the size distribution of silica particles were measured by dynamic light scattering. The zeta potential was measured by laser Doppler electrophoresis.

                              Cell culture

                              The mouse macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic Mix stock solution (GIBCO, CA, USA). All cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

                              3H-Thymidine incorporation assay

                              The proliferation of nanosilica-treated RAW 264.7 cells and untreated cells was measured using a 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. 104 cells were cultured with varying concentrations of nanosilica diluted with medium for 18 h at 37°C, and 3H-thymidine (1 μCi/well) was then added into each well. After a further 6 h, cells were harvested and lysed on glass fiber filter plates using a Cell harvester (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA). The filter plates were then dried and counted by standard liquid scintillation counting techniques in a TopCounter (Perkin-Elmer).

                              Confocal scanning laser microscopy analysis of the macrophage cell line

                              RAW 264.7 cells were cultured with nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C (100 μg/ml) for 3 h on chamber slides, then fixed at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cells were then filled with mounting medium containing 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). A glass cover slip was then placed on the slide and fixed with glue. The mounted slides were examined under a confocal scanning laser microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).

                              Results and discussion

                              First, the authors assessed the mean particle size and surface charge of 70 nm silica particles in water whose surface was unmodified (nSP70) or chemically modified with amine (nSP70-N) or carboxyl groups (nSP70-C). The results are summarized in Table 1. Mean particle sizes of nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C as measured by dynamic light scattering method were 64.2 ± 0.6, 72.7 ± 1.3, and 76.2 ± 1.6 nm, respectively. These experimentally determined particle sizes were almost equal to the primary diameter sizes (70 nm). Surface charges (zeta potential) of nSP70-N and nSP70-C were, respectively, higher and lower compared to those of nSP70.
                              Table 1

                              Average particle size and zeta potential of unmodified and modified nanosilica





                              Modification substance




                              Mean particle size in water (nm)

                              64.2 ± 0.6

                              72.7 ± 1.3

                              76.2 ± 1.6

                              Mean zeta potential (mV)

                              -42.1 ± 0.6

                              -29.8 ± 0.5

                              -72.0 ± 1.9

                              Each value represents the mean ± SD

                              Cytotoxicity of the three nanosilicas was tested by monitoring the incorporation of 3H-thymidine into RAW 264.7 cells. nSP70 showed the highest cytotoxicity (EC50 value = 121.5 μg/ml), while nSP70-N and nSP70-C failed to display any detectable cytotoxicity up to concentrations of 1000 μg/ml (Figure 1). These results demonstrate that the cytotoxic effect of nSP70 is reduced by surface modification. Some reports indicated that the exposure of cells to silica nanoparticles leads to membrane damage, caspase activation, and cell death via apoptosis. The precise trigger for these silica nanoparticle-induced cellular effects is uncertain. One study concluded that lysosomal destabilization was the initiation factor [23], whereas other investigations suggest that mitochondrial membrane damage is the critical event [24, 25]. However, it is possible that multiple factors (i.e., membrane damage, caspase activation, lysosomal destabilization, and mitochondrial membrane damage) are involved in nSP70-mediated cytotoxicity. Unfortunately, it is difficult to establish a comprehensive mechanism of nSP70 cytotoxicity based on previous observations, which have been rather inconsistent.
                              Figure 1

                              Effect of unmodified and modified nanosilica on cell proliferation. The proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells after incubation with nSP70 (circle), nSP70-N (square), or nSP70-C (triangle) for 24 h was evaluated using the 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. The percentage increase in cell proliferation was calculated relative to the negative control. Data are presented as means ± SD.

                              Some reports indicate that the cellular uptake and trafficking of nanoparticles is involved in cellular signaling, which then leads to cytotoxicity. However, the relationship between the surface properties of nanoparticles and cellular uptake/trafficking is poorly understood. To establish why a different biological effect was induced by surface modification, the intracellular localization of fluorescent-labeled nanosilicas was investigated. RAW 264.7 cells treated with 100 μg/ml of nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. After 3-h incubation, all nanosilicas were found to be localized in the cytoplasm as punctate fluorescent dots regardless of surface modification (Figure 2). Interestingly, distinctive distributions were observed in individual cases. For the nSP70-treated cells, punctate fluorescence was observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. However, nSP70-N appeared to adsorb to the plasma membrane because bright fluorescence was observed along the outline of the cell. In the nSP70-C-treated group, only intracellular punctate fluorescence was observed, suggesting that these particles were efficiently incorporated into the cells. Unfortunately, detailed intracellular localization of the silica nanoparticles was not apparent from these images. Nonetheless, differences of intracellular localization of nanosilica might have an effect on cytotoxicity. It is reported that the entry of nanosilica into the nucleus induces dysfunction of the nucleus and genotoxicity via aggregation of intranuclear protein or inhibition of RNA transcription [26]. The said report [26] together with the results of this study suggests that silica nanoparticles enter the nucleus and induce inhibition of cell proliferation. Hence, the nSP70-mediated cytotoxic effect may be related to nuclear localization.
                              Figure 2

                              Localization of unmodified and modified nanosilica in RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells were treated for 3 h with 100 μg/ml of fluorescent (green-F)-labeled nSP70 (a, b), nSP70-N (c), and nSP70-C (d) (green). The nucleus was counterstained using DAPI (blue). The original magnification of these photographs was × 63 (a) and × 100 (c, d). (b) is a magnified image of a portion of photograph (a).

                              Investigating the cellular uptake/trafficking of individual nanosilicas is important for the development of safer forms of NMs. It is known that surface chemistry of nanoparticles, such as charge and the kind of modification group, affects their interaction with biological molecules [27]. For example, nanoparticles can induce different cellular responses by binding to proteins in the blood [28, 29]. Bound proteins determine particle uptake by various cells and influence how nanoparticles interact with other blood components [3032]. These findings suggest that surface modification alters the interaction between nanosilica and surrounding molecules, such as serum proteins, thereby altering the route of uptake into the cells. Mammalian cells ingest particulate matter by several routes, such as phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, clathrin-mediated, caveolin-mediated, and clathrin/caveolin independent endocytosis [3335]. Each route involves a unique set of receptors and acts on particular types of particles. The authors anticipate that surface modification of silica nanoparticles will influence their interaction with bloodborne macromolecules. Thus, nanoparticles decorated with different macromolecules will have different intracellular distributions. The authors are currently investigating the effects of nSP70, nSP70-C, and nSP70-N on cytotoxicity, protein adsorption, cellular uptake, ROS generation, lysosomal stability, mitochondrial activity, activation of caspase 3 and 7, and mode of cell death (apoptosis versus necrosis).

                              In this study, the authors demonstrate that surface modification of nSP70 with amine or carboxyl groups alters the intracellular distribution of the nanoparticles and has an effect on cell proliferation. The authors believe that the identification of individual uptake machinery will shed light on the safety of nanosilicas, which are already commercially available in the form of medicines, cosmetics, and foods. Furthermore, it is hoped that analysis of the relationship between surface physicochemical properties and cellular response/distribution will help researchers in the development of safer forms of NMs. A safety-prediction as well as safety-evaluation approach of NMs is an essential prerequisite for maintaining the well-being of the general public.








                              The study was also supported in part by the following Research Funding Bodies: Health Labour Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan; Health Sciences Research Grants for Research on Publicly Essential Drugs and Medical Devices from the Japan Health Sciences Foundation; Global Environment Research Fund from the Minister of the Environment; Knowledge Cluster Initiative; Food Safety Commission; The Nagai Foundation Tokyo; The Cosmetology Research Foundation; The Smoking Research Foundation.

                              Authors’ Affiliations

                              Department of Toxicology and Safety Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University
                              Laboratory of Biopharmaceutical Research (Pharmaceutical Proteomics), National Institute of Biomedical Innovation
                              The Center for Advanced Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University
                              Department of Biomedical Innovation, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University


                              1. BBC Research Nanostructured Materials for the Biomedical, Pharmaceutical, & Cosmetic Markets 2007. [http://​www.​bccresearch.​com/​report/​NAN017D.​html]
                              2. Aiso S, Yamazaki K, Umeda Y, Asakura M, Takaya M, Toya T, Koda S, Nagano K, Arito H, Fukushima S: Pulmonary Toxicity of Intratracheally Instilled Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes in Male Fischer 344 Rats. Ind Health 2010, 48: 783–795. 10.2486/indhealth.MS1129View Article
                              3. Chen J, Dong X, Zhao J, Tang G: In vivo acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to mice after intraperitioneal injection. J Appl Toxicol 2009, 29: 330–337. 10.1002/jat.1414View Article
                              4. Geys J, Nemmar A, Verbeken E, Smolders E, Ratoi M, Hoylaerts MF, Nemery B, Hoet PH: Acute toxicity and prothrombotic effects of quantum dots: impact of surface charge. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116: 1607–1613. 10.1289/ehp.11566View Article
                              5. Heng BC, Zhao X, Xiong S, Ng KW, Boey FY, Loo JS: Toxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) is accentuated by oxidative stress. Food Chem Toxicol 2010, 48: 1762–1766. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.023View Article
                              6. Kocbek P, Teskac K, Kreft ME, Kristl J: Toxicological Aspects of Long-Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO(2) Nanoparticles. Small 2010, 6: 1908–1917. 10.1002/smll.201000032View Article
                              7. Liu S, Xu L, Zhang T, Ren G, Yang Z: Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by nanosized titanium dioxide in PC12 cells. Toxicology 2010, 267: 172–177. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.012View Article
                              8. Moos PJ, Chung K, Woessner D, Honeggar M, Cutler NS, Veranth JM: ZnO particulate matter requires cell contact for toxicity in human colon cancer cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2010, 23: 733–739. 10.1021/tx900203vView Article
                              9. Murray AR, Kisin E, Leonard SS, Young SH, Kommineni C, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Shvedova AA: Oxidative stress and inflammatory response in dermal toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Toxicology 2009, 257: 161–171. 10.1016/j.tox.2008.12.023View Article
                              10. Park EJ, Kim H, Kim Y, Yi J, Choi K, Park K: Carbon fullerenes (C60s) can induce inflammatory responses in the lung of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010, 244: 226–233. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.036View Article
                              11. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, Macnee W, Donaldson K: Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 423–428. 10.1038/nnano.2008.111View Article
                              12. Shin JA, Lee EJ, Seo SM, Kim HS, Kang JL, Park EM: Nanosized titanium dioxide enhanced inflammatory responses in the septic brain of mouse. Neuroscience 2010, 165: 445–454. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.057View Article
                              13. Takagi A, Hirose A, Nishimura T, Fukumori N, Ogata A, Ohashi N, Kitajima S, Kanno J: Induction of mesothelioma in p53+/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube. J Toxicol Sci 2008, 33: 105–116. 10.2131/jts.33.105View Article
                              14. Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K, Morishita Y, Yoshida T, Fujimura M, Kayamuro H, Nabeshi H, Yamashita T, Nagano K, et al.: Carbon nanotubes elicit DNA damage and inflammatory response relative to their size and shape. Inflammation 2010, 33: 276–280. 10.1007/s10753-010-9182-7View Article
                              15. Nabeshi H, Yoshikawa T, Matsuyama K, Nakazato Y, Arimori A, Isobe M, Tochigi S, Kondoh S, Hirai T, Akase T, et al.: Size-dependent cytotoxic effects of amorphous silica nanoparticles on Langerhans cells. Pharmazie 2010, 65: 199–201.
                              16. Milena RV, Luisa DC, Han Z: Efficient Energy Transfer between Silicon Nanoparticles and a Ru-Polypyridine Complex. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2009, 113: 2235–3340. 10.1021/jp804623wView Article
                              17. Nafee N, Schneider M, Schaefer UF, Lehr CM: Relevance of the colloidal stability of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity profile. Int J Pharm 2009, 381: 130–139. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.049View Article
                              18. Hauck TS, Ghazani AA, Chan WC: Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells. Small 2008, 4: 153–159. 10.1002/smll.200700217View Article
                              19. Mayer A, Vadon M, Rinner B, Novak A, Wintersteiger R, Frohlich E: The role of nanoparticle size in hemocompatibility. Toxicology 2009, 258: 139–147. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.01.015View Article
                              20. Xu F, Yuan Y, Shan X, Liu C, Tao X, Sheng Y, Zhou H: Long-circulation of hemoglobin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles as oxygen carriers with modulated surface charges. Int J Pharm 2009, 377: 199–206. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.015View Article
                              21. Pathak A, Kumar P, Chuttani K, Jain S, Mishra AK, Vyas SP, Gupta KC: Gene expression, biodistribution, and pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of chondroitin sulfate-PEI nanoconstructs mediated tumor gene therapy. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 1493–1505. 10.1021/nn900044fView Article
                              22. Zhang LW, Monteiro-Riviere NA: Mechanisms of quantum dot nanoparticle cellular uptake. Toxicol Sci 2009, 110: 138–155. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp087View Article
                              23. Wang L, Bowman L, Lu Y, Rojanasakul Y, Mercer RR, Castranova V, Ding M: Essential role of p53 in silica-induced apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005, 288: L488–496. 10.1152/ajplung.00123.2003View Article
                              24. Thibodeau MS, Giardina C, Knecht DA, Helble J, Hubbard AK: Silica-induced apoptosis in mouse alveolar macrophages is initiated by lysosomal enzyme activity. Toxicol Sci 2004, 80: 34–48. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh121View Article
                              25. Fubini B, Hubbard A: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation by silica in inflammation and fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2003, 34: 1507–1516. 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00149-7View Article
                              26. Chen M, von Mikecz A: Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregates impairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Exp Cell Res 2005, 305: 51–62. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.021View Article
                              27. Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M: Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 2009, 8: 543–557. 10.1038/nmat2442View Article
                              28. Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE: Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009, 61: 428–437. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009View Article
                              29. Deng ZJ, Mortimer G, Schiller T, Musumeci A, Martin D, Minchin RF: Differential plasma protein binding to metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 455101. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/45/455101View Article
                              30. Goppert TM, Muller RH: Polysorbate-stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles as colloidal carriers for intravenous targeting of drugs to the brain: comparison of plasma protein adsorption patterns. J Drug Target 2005, 13: 179–187. 10.1080/10611860500071292View Article
                              31. Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia MT, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R: Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science 1994, 263: 1600–1603. 10.1126/science.8128245View Article
                              32. Leu D, Manthey B, Kreuter J, Speiser P, DeLuca PP: Distribution and elimination of coated polymethyl [2–14C]methacrylate nanoparticles after intravenous injection in rats. J Pharm Sci 1984, 73: 1433–1437. 10.1002/jps.2600731028View Article
                              33. Aderem A, Underhill DM: Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17: 593–623. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.593View Article
                              34. Blander JM, Medzhitov R: On regulation of phagosome maturation and antigen presentation. Nat Immunol 2006, 7: 1029–1035. 10.1038/ni1006-1029View Article
                              35. Conner SD, Schmid SL: Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 2003, 422: 37–44. 10.1038/nature01451View Article


                              © Nabeshi et al; licensee Springer. 2011

                              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.