Effect of surface properties of silica nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity and cellular distribution in murine macrophages
- Hiromi Nabeshi1, 2,
- Tomoaki Yoshikawa1, 2Email author,
- Akihiro Arimori1, 2,
- Tokuyuki Yoshida1, 2,
- Saeko Tochigi1, 2,
- Toshiro Hirai1, 2,
- Takanori Akase1, 2,
- Kazuya Nagano2,
- Yasuhiro Abe2,
- Haruhiko Kamada2, 3,
- Shin-ichi Tsunoda2, 4,
- Norio Itoh1,
- Yasuo Yoshioka2, 3 and
- Yasuo Tsutsumi1, 2, 3Email author
© Nabeshi et al; licensee Springer. 2011
Received: 1 October 2010
Accepted: 18 January 2011
Published: 18 January 2011
Surface properties are often hypothesized to be important factors in the development of safer forms of nanomaterials (NMs). However, the results obtained from studying the cellular responses to NMs are often contradictory. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the surface properties of silica nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity against a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7). The surface of the silica nanoparticles was either unmodified (nSP70) or modified with amine (nSP70-N) or carboxyl groups (nSP70-C). First, the properties of the silica nanoparticles were characterized. RAW264.7 cells were then exposed to nSP70, nSP70-N, or nSP70-C, and any cytotoxic effects were monitored by analyzing DNA synthesis. The results of this study show that nSP70-N and nSP70-C have a smaller effect on DNA synthesis activity by comparison to unmodified nSP70. Analysis of the intracellular localization of the silica nanoparticles revealed that nSP70 had penetrated into the nucleus, whereas nSP70-N and nSP70-C showed no nuclear localization. These results suggest that intracellular localization is a critical factor underlying the cytotoxicity of these silica nanoparticles. Thus, the surface properties of silica nanoparticles play an important role in determining their safety. Our results suggest that optimization of the surface characteristics of silica nanoparticles will contribute to the development of safer forms of NMs.
Recently, a range of nanomaterials (NMs) have been designed and used in a number of different industrial applications, such as medicine, cosmetics, and foods. The application of NMs is driven by the belief that they will offer improved performance and deliver new functionalities, including improved thermal and electrical conductivity, harder and stronger materials, improved catalytic activity, and advanced optical properties. For example, current estimates indicate that the global market for cosmetics using NMs will grow by 16.6% per year, reaching US$ 155.8 million in 2012 . Hence, human exposure to NMs is already occurring and will inevitably increase in the future.
A NM is defined as a substance that has at least one dimension of <100 nm in size. NMs can assume many different forms, such as tubes, rods, wires, spheres, or particles. However, their small size can also be problematic in terms of eliciting a toxicological effect. For example, exposure of cells or animals to carbon nanotubes, titanium dioxide particles, or silver nanoparticles can induce cytotoxicity and inflammation [2–14]. We have previously shown that silica nanoparticles display a different intracellular localization compared with submicron- and micro-sized silica particles, and induce a greater cytotoxic response . However, analyses of the toxicological responses to NMs are often inconsistent. Given the uncertainty concerning the safety of NMs, it is critically important to analyze their potential toxicological hazards and devise means of minimizing the impact of exposure to such substances. These studies will assist in driving forward the nanotechnology industry in the longer term by helping the researchers to protect both individuals and the environment from potentially damaging materials.
Some recent articles have focused on the possible influence of surface charge in terms of the cellular uptake and/or cytotoxicity of nanoparticles [16–19]. Mayer et al.  reported the activation of the complement system and increased hemolysis in blood samples after exposure to positively charged polystyrene nanoparticles. Some recent studies suggest that cationic nanoparticles elicit a greater cytotoxicity compared with anionic nanoparticles [20–22]. Taken together, these studies indicate that the surface property of nanoparticles is an important factor when developing safer forms of NMs. However, studies of cellular responses to NMs often give conflicting results. The aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxicity caused by exposure of a murine macrophage cell line (RAW264.7) to silica nanoparticles whose surface was either unmodified (nSP70) or modified with amine (nSP70-N) or carboxyl groups (nSP70-C). The intracellular localization of the different nanoparticles was also examined.
Fluorescent (red-F or green-F)-labeled silica particles with surfaces that were either unmodified or modified with amine or carboxyl groups (Micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH, Rostock, Germany; designated nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C, respectively) were used in this study. The silica particles, which had a diameter of 70 nm, were prepared as a suspension (25 mg/ml) and sonicated for 5 min and then vortexed for 1 min immediately prior to conducting each experiment.
Physicochemical examination of the nanosilica preparations
Nanosilicas were diluted to 0.25 mg/ml with water, and the average particle size and zeta potential were measured using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). The mean size and the size distribution of silica particles were measured by dynamic light scattering. The zeta potential was measured by laser Doppler electrophoresis.
The mouse macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic Mix stock solution (GIBCO, CA, USA). All cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
3H-Thymidine incorporation assay
The proliferation of nanosilica-treated RAW 264.7 cells and untreated cells was measured using a 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. 104 cells were cultured with varying concentrations of nanosilica diluted with medium for 18 h at 37°C, and 3H-thymidine (1 μCi/well) was then added into each well. After a further 6 h, cells were harvested and lysed on glass fiber filter plates using a Cell harvester (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA). The filter plates were then dried and counted by standard liquid scintillation counting techniques in a TopCounter (Perkin-Elmer).
Confocal scanning laser microscopy analysis of the macrophage cell line
RAW 264.7 cells were cultured with nSP70, nSP70-N, and nSP70-C (100 μg/ml) for 3 h on chamber slides, then fixed at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde and washed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cells were then filled with mounting medium containing 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). A glass cover slip was then placed on the slide and fixed with glue. The mounted slides were examined under a confocal scanning laser microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
Results and discussion
Average particle size and zeta potential of unmodified and modified nanosilica
Mean particle size in water (nm)
64.2 ± 0.6
72.7 ± 1.3
76.2 ± 1.6
Mean zeta potential (mV)
-42.1 ± 0.6
-29.8 ± 0.5
-72.0 ± 1.9
Investigating the cellular uptake/trafficking of individual nanosilicas is important for the development of safer forms of NMs. It is known that surface chemistry of nanoparticles, such as charge and the kind of modification group, affects their interaction with biological molecules . For example, nanoparticles can induce different cellular responses by binding to proteins in the blood [28, 29]. Bound proteins determine particle uptake by various cells and influence how nanoparticles interact with other blood components [30–32]. These findings suggest that surface modification alters the interaction between nanosilica and surrounding molecules, such as serum proteins, thereby altering the route of uptake into the cells. Mammalian cells ingest particulate matter by several routes, such as phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, clathrin-mediated, caveolin-mediated, and clathrin/caveolin independent endocytosis [33–35]. Each route involves a unique set of receptors and acts on particular types of particles. The authors anticipate that surface modification of silica nanoparticles will influence their interaction with bloodborne macromolecules. Thus, nanoparticles decorated with different macromolecules will have different intracellular distributions. The authors are currently investigating the effects of nSP70, nSP70-C, and nSP70-N on cytotoxicity, protein adsorption, cellular uptake, ROS generation, lysosomal stability, mitochondrial activity, activation of caspase 3 and 7, and mode of cell death (apoptosis versus necrosis).
In this study, the authors demonstrate that surface modification of nSP70 with amine or carboxyl groups alters the intracellular distribution of the nanoparticles and has an effect on cell proliferation. The authors believe that the identification of individual uptake machinery will shed light on the safety of nanosilicas, which are already commercially available in the form of medicines, cosmetics, and foods. Furthermore, it is hoped that analysis of the relationship between surface physicochemical properties and cellular response/distribution will help researchers in the development of safer forms of NMs. A safety-prediction as well as safety-evaluation approach of NMs is an essential prerequisite for maintaining the well-being of the general public.
The study was also supported in part by the following Research Funding Bodies: Health Labour Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan; Health Sciences Research Grants for Research on Publicly Essential Drugs and Medical Devices from the Japan Health Sciences Foundation; Global Environment Research Fund from the Minister of the Environment; Knowledge Cluster Initiative; Food Safety Commission; The Nagai Foundation Tokyo; The Cosmetology Research Foundation; The Smoking Research Foundation.
- BBC Research Nanostructured Materials for the Biomedical, Pharmaceutical, & Cosmetic Markets 2007. [http://www.bccresearch.com/report/NAN017D.html]
- Aiso S, Yamazaki K, Umeda Y, Asakura M, Takaya M, Toya T, Koda S, Nagano K, Arito H, Fukushima S: Pulmonary Toxicity of Intratracheally Instilled Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes in Male Fischer 344 Rats. Ind Health 2010, 48: 783–795. 10.2486/indhealth.MS1129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Dong X, Zhao J, Tang G: In vivo acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to mice after intraperitioneal injection. J Appl Toxicol 2009, 29: 330–337. 10.1002/jat.1414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geys J, Nemmar A, Verbeken E, Smolders E, Ratoi M, Hoylaerts MF, Nemery B, Hoet PH: Acute toxicity and prothrombotic effects of quantum dots: impact of surface charge. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116: 1607–1613. 10.1289/ehp.11566View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heng BC, Zhao X, Xiong S, Ng KW, Boey FY, Loo JS: Toxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) is accentuated by oxidative stress. Food Chem Toxicol 2010, 48: 1762–1766. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kocbek P, Teskac K, Kreft ME, Kristl J: Toxicological Aspects of Long-Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO(2) Nanoparticles. Small 2010, 6: 1908–1917. 10.1002/smll.201000032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Xu L, Zhang T, Ren G, Yang Z: Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by nanosized titanium dioxide in PC12 cells. Toxicology 2010, 267: 172–177. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moos PJ, Chung K, Woessner D, Honeggar M, Cutler NS, Veranth JM: ZnO particulate matter requires cell contact for toxicity in human colon cancer cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2010, 23: 733–739. 10.1021/tx900203vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray AR, Kisin E, Leonard SS, Young SH, Kommineni C, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Shvedova AA: Oxidative stress and inflammatory response in dermal toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Toxicology 2009, 257: 161–171. 10.1016/j.tox.2008.12.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park EJ, Kim H, Kim Y, Yi J, Choi K, Park K: Carbon fullerenes (C60s) can induce inflammatory responses in the lung of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010, 244: 226–233. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.036View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, Macnee W, Donaldson K: Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 423–428. 10.1038/nnano.2008.111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin JA, Lee EJ, Seo SM, Kim HS, Kang JL, Park EM: Nanosized titanium dioxide enhanced inflammatory responses in the septic brain of mouse. Neuroscience 2010, 165: 445–454. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takagi A, Hirose A, Nishimura T, Fukumori N, Ogata A, Ohashi N, Kitajima S, Kanno J: Induction of mesothelioma in p53+/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube. J Toxicol Sci 2008, 33: 105–116. 10.2131/jts.33.105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K, Morishita Y, Yoshida T, Fujimura M, Kayamuro H, Nabeshi H, Yamashita T, Nagano K, et al.: Carbon nanotubes elicit DNA damage and inflammatory response relative to their size and shape. Inflammation 2010, 33: 276–280. 10.1007/s10753-010-9182-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nabeshi H, Yoshikawa T, Matsuyama K, Nakazato Y, Arimori A, Isobe M, Tochigi S, Kondoh S, Hirai T, Akase T, et al.: Size-dependent cytotoxic effects of amorphous silica nanoparticles on Langerhans cells. Pharmazie 2010, 65: 199–201.Google Scholar
- Milena RV, Luisa DC, Han Z: Efficient Energy Transfer between Silicon Nanoparticles and a Ru-Polypyridine Complex. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2009, 113: 2235–3340. 10.1021/jp804623wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nafee N, Schneider M, Schaefer UF, Lehr CM: Relevance of the colloidal stability of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity profile. Int J Pharm 2009, 381: 130–139. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hauck TS, Ghazani AA, Chan WC: Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells. Small 2008, 4: 153–159. 10.1002/smll.200700217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mayer A, Vadon M, Rinner B, Novak A, Wintersteiger R, Frohlich E: The role of nanoparticle size in hemocompatibility. Toxicology 2009, 258: 139–147. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.01.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu F, Yuan Y, Shan X, Liu C, Tao X, Sheng Y, Zhou H: Long-circulation of hemoglobin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles as oxygen carriers with modulated surface charges. Int J Pharm 2009, 377: 199–206. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pathak A, Kumar P, Chuttani K, Jain S, Mishra AK, Vyas SP, Gupta KC: Gene expression, biodistribution, and pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of chondroitin sulfate-PEI nanoconstructs mediated tumor gene therapy. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 1493–1505. 10.1021/nn900044fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang LW, Monteiro-Riviere NA: Mechanisms of quantum dot nanoparticle cellular uptake. Toxicol Sci 2009, 110: 138–155. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Bowman L, Lu Y, Rojanasakul Y, Mercer RR, Castranova V, Ding M: Essential role of p53 in silica-induced apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005, 288: L488–496. 10.1152/ajplung.00123.2003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thibodeau MS, Giardina C, Knecht DA, Helble J, Hubbard AK: Silica-induced apoptosis in mouse alveolar macrophages is initiated by lysosomal enzyme activity. Toxicol Sci 2004, 80: 34–48. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fubini B, Hubbard A: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation by silica in inflammation and fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2003, 34: 1507–1516. 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00149-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, von Mikecz A: Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregates impairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Exp Cell Res 2005, 305: 51–62. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M: Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 2009, 8: 543–557. 10.1038/nmat2442View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE: Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009, 61: 428–437. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deng ZJ, Mortimer G, Schiller T, Musumeci A, Martin D, Minchin RF: Differential plasma protein binding to metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 455101. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/45/455101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goppert TM, Muller RH: Polysorbate-stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles as colloidal carriers for intravenous targeting of drugs to the brain: comparison of plasma protein adsorption patterns. J Drug Target 2005, 13: 179–187. 10.1080/10611860500071292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia MT, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R: Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science 1994, 263: 1600–1603. 10.1126/science.8128245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leu D, Manthey B, Kreuter J, Speiser P, DeLuca PP: Distribution and elimination of coated polymethyl [2–14C]methacrylate nanoparticles after intravenous injection in rats. J Pharm Sci 1984, 73: 1433–1437. 10.1002/jps.2600731028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aderem A, Underhill DM: Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17: 593–623. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.593View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blander JM, Medzhitov R: On regulation of phagosome maturation and antigen presentation. Nat Immunol 2006, 7: 1029–1035. 10.1038/ni1006-1029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conner SD, Schmid SL: Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 2003, 422: 37–44. 10.1038/nature01451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.