Open Access

Nanogap structures for molecular nanoelectronics

  • Paolo Motto1Email author,
  • Alice Dimonte2,
  • Ismael Rattalino2,
  • Danilo Demarchi1,
  • Gianluca Piccinini1 and
  • Pierluigi Civera1
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:113

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-113

Received: 28 November 2011

Accepted: 9 February 2012

Published: 9 February 2012


This study is focused on the realization of nanodevices for nano and molecular electronics, based on molecular interactions in a metal-molecule-metal (M-M-M) structure. In an M-M-M system, the electronic function is a property of the structure and can be characterized through I/V measurements. The contact between the metals and the molecule was obtained by gold nanogaps (with a dimension of less than 10 nm), produced with the electromigration technique. The nanogap fabrication was controlled by a custom hardware and the related software system. The studies were carried out through experiments and simulations of organic molecules, in particular oligothiophenes.

1 Introduction

Electrical nanogap devices are emerging because of their possibility to be the building blocks for connecting [1], analyzing [2], and using molecules, and so for implementing nano-metric electronic devices [3]. The main advantage of these systems is, in general, the ability to measure and to transduce events of specific molecules into useful electrical signals [4]. As a consequence, nanogaps have nowadays a high level of interest in research. There are a lot of techniques for obtaining nanogaps, but a process to totally control the gap size has not been found yet. Electromigration effect is the simplest technique useful for obtaining the break of the two terminals structures where the nanogap is built [5, 6]. Electro-induced break junction (EIBJ) can generate an instantaneous and random break, but to obtain reproducible and stable devices it is very important to control the width of the nanogap [7, 8]. For this reason, the quantity of current used to stimulate the electromigration effect must be controlled with a custom feedback circuit that manages all the fabrication steps. The authors defined a method for producing nanogaps inside gold structures, and the controlled use of the electromigration enabled to build gaps under ten nanometers.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Realization of the chip

The electromigration is mainly dominated by the current density [9] and by the temperature of the wire [10]. Both these quantities can be controlled by a proper geometry of the probe [11] and by the applied voltage waveform [12]. Using electromigration as technique for creating nanogaps, the wire has to have optimized geometries to facilitate the phenomenon and make it more controllable. From this point, to avoid a too high input current, it is necessary to have a small section of the wire [11]; moreover, if the section of the wire is too small, the thermal conductance decreases and the temperature of the wire tends to become excessive, leading to the melting of the wire.

For these reasons, it is fundamental to have a model that can simulate the behavior of the physical phenomena during the electromigration. In particular, it is interesting to know and to anticipate the temperature inside the gold wire and for this it is necessary to model the geometry of the probe with a software simulation tool. The objective is therefore to achieve a wire section as small as possible, to trigger the electromigration also at lower current, obtaining a better control and a more regular shape. Figure 1a shows the geometry of our probe described in Comsol Multi-physics, while Figure 1b shows the single wire. To evaluate the temperature behavior during the voltage application, we performed a large number of simulations using different values of wire length, keeping in mind that there is a lower limit for the length of the wire that will allow electromigration to occur (the Blech length [1315]). Figure 1c shows the best parameters for generating a temperature profile quite sharp in a way that should be possible to focus the electromigration phenomenon in the center of the wire. The temperature profile along wire length was modeled with the equations:
Figure 1

Comsol model of the probe. (a) Geometry of the probe; (b) single wire level; (c) best parameters for generating a sharp temperature profile: wire length l_wire = 8 μm; wire width s_wire = 2 μm; wire thickness au_z = 25 nm; substrate thickness bios_z = 200 nm.

Q = ρ C p T t - ( K T )
Q = σ | V | 2
J = σ V
Equation (1) is the law of conservation of energy: Q is the power transferred to a point, ρ is the mass volume density, C p is the heat capacity, T is the temperature, t is the time and K is the thermal conductivity. Equation (2) gives the power dissipation (Joule effect): σ is the electrical conductivity and V is the electrical potential. Finally, Equation (3) is the Ohm's law in local form: J is the current density. All the equations are related to an infinitesimal point of space. Comsol uses the nodes of the mesh geometry to make a spatial sampling and integrates the equations in the volume using the nodes as points of integration: if the sampling is quite dense, the error is negligible. As result we have obtained the plot shown in Figure 2a that represents the temperature variation in the wire length. The geometry created also allows a uniform distribution of current density (Figure 2b).
Figure 2

Results of the electrothermal simulation made with Comsol. (a) Temperature profile; (b) current density profile.

For having a useful platform where to produce the nanogaps, a silicon chip was realized, containing eight gold probes as shown in Figure 3b, each of these connectable by bonding. In this way, it is possible to realize on the same chip eight nanogap structures, and each one is independent, so an high number of measurements is individually achievable. The final dimension of the chip is 2.4 × 4.1 mm, giving the possibility to insert it in heads of instruments as a cryostat or FESEM/AFM/STM microscopes, for doing for example measurement in vacuum and at very low temperatures. The chip is also ready to be wire bonded to a PCB (Figure 3a). It is possible to perform wet analysis too, for molecule characterizations, just spinning on the chip the solution that has to be measured. Obviously molecules in solutions must have some suitable sites for bonding with gold, such as thiol groups, in this way it is possible to obtain the desired M-M-M structure.
Figure 3

The chip. Picture of the final chip containing the eight probes. (a) The chip bonded on the PCB; (b) layout of the chip; (c) zoom of one of the probes: G1 and G2 indicate the pads of the gates.

The realization of the chip starts from a silicon wafer capped by 200 nm of SiO2; the wafer is, then, inserted in a plasma oxygen machine for increasing the oxygen atoms concentration on the surface. Hydroxylation process is developed with a piranha solution, and so, after rinsing and drying, the surface of the wafer exposes -OH groups, fundamental for the anchoring of the organic compound that is evaporated on. In fact, to promote the adhesion of gold on the SiO2 surface, an insulating layer of MPTMS

(3-Mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane is then deposited [16, 17]. The insulation property is important because has to be avoided any alternative path of current, that has to flow through the gold layer only. After, a gold film of 25 nm is grown on the MPTMS layer using an EVA600 evaporator. The wafer is inserted in a EVG-SUSS MA6 where a photolithographic mask process is performed employing a positive photoresist, afterwards the gold etching is done thanks to Iodine/Potassium solution. A second photolithographic process is performed through a second mask that allows the realization of the chip's pads, built with a thin layer of titanium of 100 nm and an aluminum layer of 700 nm (see Figure 4).
Figure 4

Chip structure representation. 3D representation of the final chip with the gold pads.

The custom hardware

To control the experiments, a custom electronic board, connected to a Linux-embedded system, has been realized. To provide the current density of 108A/cm2, needed for the activation of the electromigration process, the circuit must be able to supply a current of at least 50 mA, because of the dimensions of realized geometries. The front-end must also be able to measure the real time current flowing in the wire, to evaluate resistance variations, from hundreds of mA (when the current is high and the break is not yet created) to some pA (for measuring the tunnel current inside the nanogap). The block diagram of the system is showed in Figure 5, where it is possible to see that the gold probe is connected to the circuit that receives the signal from the embedded Linux (analog input) and generates the desired current for inducing the electromigration. The current in the probe, and so the resistance, is measured. These values are sent to the embedded Linux in which are implemented the algorithms for controlling the current to inject into the probe. In this way, the fabrication of the nanogap is checked, avoiding thermal runaway that can create too large breaks [1822], not useful for the desired applications.
Figure 5

Block diagram of the electronic system. The system and its modularity.

The custom system consists of a driver board that hosts a digital-to-analog converter that realizes the input voltage waveform; a measurement board composed by a transimpedance amplifier with variable feedback, in order to measure a wide range of currents, and an analog-to-digital converter; a switch board to allow the connection of external instrumentation; a digital board that provides electrical power supplies and the bus connection between all boards. The embedded Linux system is built with a real-time custom kernel, so that the electronic components of the other boards are driven in a deterministic way. We have developed a wireless connection between this board and a host computer for sending the experimental data. This solution allows also the use of the system in chambers where a wire interconnection can create difficulties.

The custom algorithm

Nanogaps are produced using a specific algorithm, customized for an optimal nanogap fabrication and with several goals: current management, feedback controlled breaking, temperature control for avoiding the thermal runaway. A simplified schematic of the process flow is reported in Figure 6. The software controls the voltage Vbias applied to the probe and stops when the resistance exceeds the value of 13 k Ω, that means that the nanogap is produced. In fact this resistance value is about the inverse of the quantum conductance 2e2/h = 77.6 μS and represents the conductance of a single atom of gold placed between two electrodes [23]. As it is possible to see always in Figure 6, there are two feedback mechanisms. The first one performs an absolute control over the initial resistance R0, and when (R - R0)/R0 > 0.02 the Vbias is set to the 85% of its value; this is done for controlling the temperature of the wire and for preventing melting and surface tension effects, that can be the cause of much larger gaps and gold island formation [1820]. The second mechanism performs a check of the resistance value relative to a circular buffer of n samples, when (R - R i )/R i > 0.01, with R i the average of the last i samples, the Vbias is decreased to the 95% of its value. The second feedback mechanism performs a check of the resistance in order to control the electromigration effect: the increase of the resistance is no longer linear as in the Joule Heating, but exponential, and we need to promptly react to stop the phenomenon. We also noted in many experiments performed by us, that, after the activation of the feedback, the resistance value decreases due to the acceleration of the grain growth by Joule heating of the wire [24]. In this case, the first mechanism becomes useless and then the process is controlled only by the second one. Figure 7 shows the probe resistance as a function of the voltage applied: when the temperature increases, the resistance of the wire tends to increase too.
Figure 6

Flowchart of the algorithm governing the feedback-controlled electromigration process. The two feedback mechanisms: the first one is used to avoid the thermal runaway and the second one is used to control the electromigration effect.
Figure 7

Monitoring plot of the probe resistance. R/V plot of an EIBJ experiment.

The higher resistance causes a current reduction, but increasing the voltage in this case creates a mechanism by which the current flow tends to be constant. In fact the first increase in resistance (linear growth) is only due to this heat effect, but, when the temperature reaches high values and the current density is near to 108 A/cm2, the electromigration starts (exponential growth) and the structure begins to change.

The experimental time of electromigration has been estimated to be about 50-60 min. All the experimental data obtained by the electromigration tests are stored in an internal database in the Linux board, but on the host computer too, that collects information through the wireless connection. This makes possible to generate very accurate statistics. To evaluate the outcome of our experiments, we performed the analysis of gap widths with a FESEM microscope. Example of a fabricated nanogap is shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8

FESEM image of a nanogap. 2.49 nm nanogap. Image captured by Field Effect Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM), 100 k× magnification (700 k× magnification for the zoom zone).

3 Results

The method used to fabricate nanogaps, through these "ad hoc" software and electronic circuit, has produced nanogaps under 3 nm as the one shown in Figure 8. It is interesting to observe that the gap has an almost constant width for a relative long path. Analyzing the experimental results, fabricated nanogaps show an average dimension of less than 10 nm. Statistical analysis about the final dimension of the gaps confirm that the authors are now able to create nanogaps under 10 nm with an high reproducibility (Figure 9), in fact about the 80% of the nanogaps are under 10 nm.
Figure 9

Plot of the distribution of the nanogap dimension. Statistical dispersion of nanogap dimensions, 80% of them are under 10 nm.

To evaluate the use of nanogaps as electrodes for molecular electronics, a solution of oligothiophenes molecules (2,2':5',2":5",2"'-bis-quaterthiophene) in TetraHydroFuran (THF) has been deposited using the method of spin coating. The choice of this type of molecules is due to the presence of a sulfur atom in the aromatic ring: it binds easily to the gold of the nanogap electrodes. After the insertion in the nanogaps, the molecular solution was characterized by current-voltage (I/V) measurements (Figure 10), made by a Sub-Femtoamp Remote SourceMeter (Keithley 6430). The blue line, reported in Figure 10, shows a profile with the expected trend (see the characterization of molecular wires in [2529]). The red line represents the characteristic of the solvent THF in an open nanogap: the values reported show that the contribution of both the solvent and the tunneling current dependent on the size of the nanogap are negligible. It is interesting to mention that the curve is asymmetric, indicating that the contacts between the molecule and the electrodes are not perfectly symmetric [3032].
Figure 10

I/V characteristic of the M-M-M system. I/V plot of the M-M-M system with the oligothiophene molecule inside the gap (blue line) and the THF solvent (red line). The concentration of the solution contain the molecules deposited on the chip was 100 nM. The size of the nanogap is 4,7 nm.

The molecular length plays a key role in the electrical conduction.

Experiments have found that the conductance G decreases exponentially with molecular length L [33] and can be described by
G = A e - β L
where A is a constant and β is a decay constant varying between 0.09 and 0.16 Å-1 for the oligothiophenes [28, 29]. Figure 11 shows an ab initio simulation of the molecule placed between the electrodes where the molecule orientation was performed with the software Gaussian 09. Different orientations are possible, but less probable. Moreover, our simulations show a variation of the current less than 30% respect to the optimized case, keeping the same shape of the I/V curve.
Figure 11

Orientation of the oligothiophene molecule. Ab initio simulation of the molecule placed between the electrodes. The figure shows the orientation of the molecule after the optimization.

4 Conclusions

A system composed by a software interface and an electronic control circuit for the nanogap realization has been implemented, and all the technological steps for arriving at the final nanogap production has been presented in this study. The probe geometries were optimized through electrothermal simulations performed with the COMSOL Multi-physics software. The method applied demonstrated the possibility to build nanogaps under 3 nm with controlled feedback, having a good statistical yield with about the 80% of the nanogaps below 10 nm (Figure 9). In the experimental phase an oligothiophene molecule was successfully inserted in the nanogap, producing a first Metal-Molecule-Metal system, and it was characterized by current-voltage (Figure 10) measurements, taking into account that the coupling between metal and molecule plays a key role. Future study will be focused on the optimization of the system for the realization of integrated molecular devices.



The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Valentina Cauda for the precious advices about chemistry, Dr. Salvatore Guastella for the FESEM microscope characterizations, Dr. Dario Trimarchi and Dr. Davide Daprà for the electronic system design. They want to acknowledge too the group of Prof. Mucci at University of Modena for the synthesis of the oligothiophene molecules.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electronics
Italian Institute of Technology, IIT@Polito Center


  1. Tour JM: Molecular electronics. synthesis and testing of components. Acc Chem Res 2000, 33(11):791–804. 10.1021/ar0000612View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shiigi H, Tokonami S, Yakabe H, Nagaoka T: Label-free electronic detection of dna-hybridization on nanogapped gold particle film. J Am Chem Soc (JACS) 2005, 127: 3280–3281. 10.1021/ja0445793View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ventra MD, Pantelides ST, Lang ND: The benzene molecule as a molecular resonant-tunneling transistor. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76(23):3448–3450. 10.1063/1.126673View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yi M, Jeong KH, Lee LP: Theoretical and experimental study towards a nanogap dielectric biosensor. Biosen Bioelectron 2005, 20: 1320–1326. 10.1016/j.bios.2004.05.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Morpurgo AF, Marcusa CM, Robinson DB: Controlled fabrication of metallic electrodes with atomic separation. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 74(14):2084–2086. 10.1063/1.123765View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Park H, Lim A, Alivisatos A: Fabrication of metallic electrodes with nanometer separation by electromigration. Appl Phys Lett 1999, 75(2):301–303. 10.1063/1.124354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Shih VCY, Zheng S, Chang A, Tai YC: Nanometer gaps by feedback-controlled electromigration. The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston 2003, 2: 1530–1533.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu ZM, Steinacher R, Calame S, van der Molen SJ, Schnenbergera C: Feedback controlled electromigration in four-terminal nanojunctions. Appl Phys Lett 2007., 91: 053 118–1-053 118–3 053 118-1-053 118-3Google Scholar
  9. Pierce DG, Brusius PG: Electromigration: A review. Microelectron Reliab 1997, 37(7):1053–1072. 10.1016/S0026-2714(96)00268-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Trouwborst ML, van der Molen SJ, van Wees BJ: The role of Joule heating in the formation of nanogaps by electromigration. J Appl Phys 2006, 99(11):114316–1-114316–7. 10.1063/1.2203410View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Durkan C, Schneider MA, Welland M: Analysis of failure mechanisms in electrically stressed gold nanowires. J Appl Phys 1999, 99: 1280–1286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadeed FO, Durkan C: Controlled fabrication of 1–2 nm nanogaps by electromigration in Au and Au/Pd nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 123120. 10.1063/1.2785982View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Blech IA: Electromigration in thin aluminum films on titanium nitride. J Appl Phys 1976, 47(4):1203–1208. 10.1063/1.322842View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Blech IA, Herring C: Stress generation by electromigration. Appl Phys Lett 1976, 29(3):131–133. 10.1063/1.89024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Blech IA, Tai KL: Measurement of Stress Gradients Generated by Electromigration. Appl Phys Lett 1977, 30(8):387–389. 10.1063/1.89414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahapatro AK, Gosh S, Janes DB: Nanometer scale electrode separation (nanogap) using electromigration at room temperature. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 2006, 5(3):232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahapatro AK, Scott A, A M, Janes DB: Gold surface with sub-nm roughness realized by evaporation on a molecular adhesion monolayer. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 151917. 10.1063/1.2183820View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Strachan DR, Smith DE, Johnston DE, Park TH, Therien MJ, Bonnell DA, Johnson A: Controlled fabrication of Nano-gaps in ambient environment for molecular electronics. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 86: 043109. 10.1063/1.1857095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Heersche H, de Groot Z, Folk JA, Kouwenhoven LP, van der Zant HSJ: Kondo effect in the presence of magnetic impurities. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 96: 017205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Houck AA, Labaziewicz J, Chan EK, Folk JA, Chuang IL: Kondo effect in electromigrated gold break junctions. Nano Lett 2005, 5(9):1685–1689. 10.1021/nl050799iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Esen G, Fuhrer MS: Temperature control of electromigration to form gold nanogap junctions. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 87: 263101. 10.1063/1.2149174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. van der Zant HSJ: Molecular three-terminal devices: fabrication and measurements. Faraday Discuss 2006, 131: 347–356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Datta S: An atomistic view of electrical resistance. In Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor Edited by: Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press, New York. 2005, 1: 1–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chengxiang X, Jung YK, Reginald MP: Reconnectable sub 5 nm nanogaps in ultralong gold nanowires. Nano Lett 2009, 9: 2133–2138. 10.1021/nl900698sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zahid F, Paulsson M, Datta S: Electrical Conduction through Molecules. In Advanced Semiconductors and Organic Nano-Techniques. Edited by: Morkoc H. Waltham, Massachusetts: Academic Press (Elsevier); 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Salomon A, Cahen D, Lindsay S, Tomfohr J, Engelkes VB, Frisbie CD: Comparison of electronic transport measurements on organic molecules. Adv Mater 2003, 15(22):1881–1890. 10.1002/adma.200306091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. P BJ: Molecular electronics: a rewiew of Metal-Molecule-Metal junctions. Lecture Notes Phys 2001, 579: 105–124. 10.1007/3-540-45532-9_6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamada R, Kumazawa H, Noutoshi T, Tanaka S, Tada H: Electrical conductance of oligothiophene molecular wires. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 1237–1240. 10.1021/nl0732023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamada R, Kumazawa H, Tanaka S, Tada H: Electrical resistance of long oligothiophene molecules. Appl Phys Express 2009, 2: 025002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mujica V, Ratner M: Molecular Conductance Junctions: A Theory and Modeling Progress Report. In Handbook of Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology. Volume 12. Edited by: WA Goddard, DW Brenner SE Lyshevski, and GJ Iafrate, Boca Raton, FL. USA: Taylor & Francis Group LLC, CRC Press; 2002:1–27.Google Scholar
  31. Speyer G, Akis R, Ferry DK: Complexities of the molecular conductance problem. In Nano and Molecular Electronics Handbook. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor & Francis Group LLC, CRC Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  32. Chen F, Hihath J, Huang Z, Li X, Tao NJ: Measurement of Single-Molecule Conductance. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2007, 58: 535–564. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104523View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Tao NJ: Electron transport in molecular junctions. Nat Nanotechnol 2006, 1: 173–181. 10.1038/nnano.2006.130View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Motto et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.