Open Access

Optical and electrical properties of undoped and doped Ge nanocrystals

  • Samaresh Das1,
  • Rakesh Aluguri1,
  • Santanu Manna1,
  • Rajkumar Singha1,
  • Achintya Dhar1,
  • Lorenzo Pavesi2 and
  • Samit Kumar Ray1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:143

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-143

Received: 30 November 2011

Accepted: 20 February 2012

Published: 20 February 2012


Size-dependent photoluminescence characteristics from Ge nanocrystals embedded in different oxide matrices have been studied to demonstrate the light emission in the visible wavelength from quantum-confined charge carriers. On the other hand, the energy transfer mechanism between Er ions and Ge nanocrystals has been exploited to exhibit the emission in the optical fiber communication wavelength range. A broad visible electroluminescence, attributed to electron hole recombination of injected carriers in Ge nanocrystals, has been achieved. Nonvolatile flash-memory devices using Ge nanocrystal floating gates with different tunneling oxides including SiO2, Al2O3, HfO2, and variable oxide thickness [VARIOT] tunnel barrier have been fabricated. An improved charge storage characteristic with enhanced retention time has been achieved for the devices using VARIOT oxide floating gate.


The development of silicon-based optoelectronics has attracted a lot of attention over the past decade [1, 2]. The concept is based on integration of Si-based photonic components, in which light can be generated, waveguided, modulated, amplified, and detected with the advanced electronic components to realize monolithically integrated Si-based optoelectronic circuits. The study of Ge [35] and Si [6, 7] nanostructures is motivated by the prediction that quantum confinement of carriers leads to efficient luminescence despite the indirect nature of the energy gaps. Germanium nanocrystals [NCs] have been found to exhibit visible luminescence at room temperature [35, 8, 9]. However, the mechanism of visible luminescence from Si and Ge nanocrystals is still disputed. Rare earth-doped semiconductors also have been shown to be of remarkably important for combining electronic devices with optical elements [10]. During the last several decades, the optical properties of erbium-doped semiconductor materials have been extensively studied due to the intra-4f 4I13/24I15/2 transition (first excited state to the ground state of Er3+ ion), which overlaps with the 1.54 μm wavelength of maximum transmission of silica-based optical fibers. Since Ge has higher electron and hole mobility, larger excitonic Bohr radius than Si [5] and is compatible with planar Si technology, efforts are being made to study the optical properties of Er-doped Ge nanostructures.

On the other hand, flash memory with nanocrystals floating gate has received much attention because of the high-speed write/erase operation, long retention time, and small device size [11]. Ge with a smaller band gap compared to Si is expected to improve the memory characteristics by inducing a higher valence band offset between the Si substrate and nanocrystals [12, 13]. A thick tunnel barrier can guarantee a long retention time of the flash-memory device, but unfortunately, it slows down the programming speed. A thinner tunnel barrier will result faster programming speed but shorten the retention time. The use of a physically thicker high-permittivity oxide ensures good retention characteristics. On the other hand, thin-tunneling barriers due to the low equivalent oxide thickness allow high currents across the tunneling oxide at low control gate voltages during programming and erasing cycles [9, 1416]. For Ge nanocrystals embedded in a high dielectric constant [high-k] material, the electrostatic energy is much higher due to the difference in the static dielectric constant of SiO2 and high-k oxides [17]. In 2003, VARIOT structured tunnel oxide was reported by Govoreanu et al. [18] for the first time. Simulations and experimental results showed that a larger injected gate current density is possible for the memory devices with VARIOT structure tunnel barrier compared to memories with only a single-layered tunnel oxide [18, 19].

In this paper, we report the size- and host matrix-dependent photoluminescence [PL] and electroluminescence [EL] characteristics of Ge nanocrystals. The systematic study demonstrated the origin of visible luminescence due to the quantum confinement of carriers. The temperature-dependent characteristics of 1.54 μm emission from Er-doped Ge nanocrystals are also presented. An improved charge storage characteristic for the nanocrystal in trilayer structure is reported using high-k Al2O3 and HfO2, as compared to conventional SiO2. The experimental results showed that a VARIOT tunnel stack is attractive as a replacement for the traditional single-layer tunnel barrier for improving the data retention and programming speed simultaneously.

Experimental details

Ge nanocrystals embedded in different dielectric matrix were prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering (EDWARDS ESM 100 system, Sussex, UK). The structures used in this study were metal-insulator-semiconductor [MIS] capacitors with a dielectric stack consisting of Ge NCs sandwiched between tunneling and capping oxides. P-type (100) Si substrates with resistivity 7-14 Ω cm were initially cleaned by Piranha process followed by dipping in dilute HF for 1 min to remove the native oxide from the surface. The details of sample preparation can be found elsewhere [9, 15]. The sample details studied here are given in Table 1. Er-doped Ge nanocrystals in Al2O3 matrix were grown on p-Si (100) substrates at 600°C under vacuum using pulsed-laser deposition (KrF excimer laser with wavelength 248 nm, energy 300 mJ, and pulse duration 20 ns). The sample was then annealed at 900°C in N2 atmosphere for 1 h to form the Ge nanocrystal and to disperse Er throughout the sample. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy [HRTEM] was carried out using a JEM 2100F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) field emission system with an operating voltage of 200 kV to probe the formation of Ge nanocrystals. Photoluminescence spectra of samples were recorded using a He-Cd laser as an excitation source operating at 325 nm with an output power density of 1.3 W/cm2 and a TRIAX 320 monochromator (Wotol, 60 rue Waldeck Rousseau, Lyon, France)fitted with a Hamamatsu PMT (R-928, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan) tube and InGaAs detector (Hamamatsu Photonics). The electroluminescence signals were collected with a Spectra-Pro 2300i monochromator (Roper Scientific GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany) coupled with nitrogen-cooled charge coupled device camera. The electrical properties of the samples were measured by a Keithley semiconductor parameter analyzer (4200-SCS, Keithley instruments, Cleveland, OH).
Table 1

Details of various samples deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering system

Sample name

Tunnel oxide (nm)

Middle layer (nm)

Cap oxide (nm)

Post-deposition treatment

(°C for 30 min in N2)


SiO2: ~5

SiGe: 15

SiO2: 25

Annealed at 800


SiO2: ~5

SiGe: 15

SiO2: 25

Annealed at 900


SiO2: ~5

SiGe: 15

SiO2: 25

Annealed at 1,000


SiO2: ~5

Ge + Al2O3: 15

Al2O3: 25

Annealed at 900


HfO2: ~5

Ge + HfO2: 15

HfO2: 25

Annealed at 900


SiO2: ~2.5

HfO2: ~ 5

Ge+HfO2: 15

HfO2: 25

Annealed at 900

'RA', 'RFS', and 'RS' are sample structures.

Results and discussions

TEM studies of Ge nanocrystals

Figure 1 shows the TEM image of Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO2 matrix. Figure 1a shows the plane-view TEM image of the sample annealed at 800°C (sample name: 'RS-1'). Numerous small Ge nanocrystals can be seen to be distributed throughout the film. The average diameter of the nanocrystal is 2.4 nm with the full width at half maxima [FWHM] of the size distribution being 0.8 nm. Figure 1b shows the electron micrograph of the sample annealed at 900°C for 30 min (sample name: 'RS-2'). The Gaussian fitting of the size distribution gives an average nanocrystal size of about 4.3 nm. Figure 1c shows the micrograph of the sample annealed at 1,000°C for 30 min (sample name: 'RS-3'). From TEM micrograph, it is seen that the 'RS-3' sample contains both large- and small-sized nanocrystals, which may occur due to the clustering of nanoparticles during the heat treatment process. A broad distribution in particle size with an average value of 10 nm indicates an increase in size with annealing temperature. The formation of Ge nanocrystals is attributed to the precipitation of Ge within the thermodynamically favorable SiO2 layer during post-deposition annealing in N2. The crystallization process is a dynamical one with nucleation and growth, in addition to the migration of the Ge nanocrystals. It has been reported [20] that the diffusion of Ge in SiO2 and nucleation of Ge depend on the annealing temperature. The size of the nanocrystals increases with increasing annealing temperature due to enhanced nucleation and growth process of Ge nanocrystals at the Si-SiO2 interface. Furthermore, a higher annealing temperature leads to an increase in the critical nucleus size, and would also raise the barrier for nucleation.
Figure 1

Plane-view TEM micrograph of Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO 2 matrix for the sample. (a) 'RS-1', (b) 'RS-2', and (c) 'RS-3'.

Figure 2a shows the plane-view TEM images of Ge NCs embedded in Al2O3 matrix annealed at 900°C (sample name: 'RA'). The dark patches are Ge nanocrystals of diameter 5-10 nm in the amorphous Al2O3 matrix. The nanocrystals are almost spherical and are well dispersed in the Al2O3 matrix. First, the size distribution of Ge nanocrystals obtained from TEM image analysis has been plotted. Then, the mean nanocrystal size was determined by fitting the distribution curve with the Gaussian distribution function. The estimated size distribution of the nanocrystals for 'RA' sample can be approximated by a Gaussian function with an average diameter of 7.1 nm. The change in Gibbs free energy of formation of GeO (-111.8 kcal/mol) is much smaller than that of high-k Al2O3 (-378.2 kcal/mol) [21], which results in the oxidation of Al and agglomeration of Ge atoms into nanocrystals in Al2O3 matrix during thermal annealing at high temperatures. Figure 2b shows a high-resolution TEM micrograph of Ge nanocrystals embedded in HfO2 matrix and annealed at 900°C (sample name: 'RF'), which exhibit clear lattice fringes. The average diameter of the nanocrystal is about 7.8 nm. The change in Gibbs free energy [ΔG] of formation (at 298.15 K) of GeO (-111.8 kcal/mol) [21] is much smaller than that of high-k HfO2 (-260.1 kcal/mol). Therefore, the change in Gibbs free energy is negative in the forward direction in the following reaction.
Figure 2

Plane-view TEM micrographs of Ge-NC. Embedded in (a) Al2O3 matrix (sample 'RA'), (b) HfO2 matrix (sample 'RF').

Ge O 2 +  Hf   Hf O 2 +  Ge

Hence, the mixture of HfO2 and Ge has the lower Gibbs free energy in the co-sputtered film, resulting in the agglomeration of Ge atoms into nanocrystals.

Photoluminescence characteristics of undoped Ge nanocrystals

Figure 3 presents the size-dependent photoluminescence spectra of Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO2 matrix. For a closer insight into the PL results, the spectra have been deconvoluted using Gaussian function as shown in Figure 3, and the results are summarized in Table 2. For 800°C annealed ('RS-1') sample, the PL spectrum can be represented by two peaks centered at 2.31 and 2.58 eV with FWHM of 0.38 and 0.68 eV, respectively. Similarly, for 'RS-2' sample, the PL spectrum consists of the peaks centered at 2.11 and 2.8 eV with FWHM of 0.30 and 0.91 eV, respectively. On the other hand, 'RS-3' sample shows a sharp luminescence at 1.88 eV with FWHM of 0.24 eV. The PL peaks at 2.31, 2.11, and 1.88 eV are observed in accordance to quantum size effect for 'RS-1', 'RS-2', and 'RS-3' samples having average nanocrystal diameters of 2.4, 5.3, and 10 nm, respectively. Hence, the above three PL peaks originate due to radiative recombination of excitons in quantum-confined Ge nanocrystals. Several researchers [8, 22, 23] have reported size-independent photoluminescence in the energy range of 2.5 to 3.2 eV from Ge nanocrystals, the origin of which is attributed to oxygen vacancies [VO-], oxygen-germanium vacancy pairs (VGe, VO)+, and related defect centers. Hence, a broad PL from 2.5 to 3.2 eV for as-deposited sample, 2.58 eV PL peak for 'RS-1', and 2.8 eV PL peak for 'RS-2' sample might be related to the defect centers. The PL intensity of defect related peak gets reduced, and that of excitonic recombination is enhanced with the increase of annealing temperature due to improved crystallinity of Ge nanocrystals. However, a red shift of the excitonic peak with increased annealing temperature due to larger-sized nanocrystals manifests the confinement of charge carriers.
Figure 3

Room-temperature photoluminescence from Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO 2 matrix annealed at different temperatures.

Table 2

PL peak energy and nanocrystal size for SiO2 embedded Ge NCs



PL peak details

dNC (TEM) nm


Peak position (eV)






2.4 ± 0.8




5.3 ± 1.3




10 ± 3

dNC, nanocrystal diameter; FWHM, full width at half maxima; 'RS-1', 'RS-2', and 'RS-3', sample structures defined in Table 1; PL, photoluminescence; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.

Figure 4 shows the effect of host matrix on room temperature photoluminescence spectra of Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO2 ('RS-2'), Al2O3 ('RA'), and HfO2 ('RF') and annealed at a temperature of 900°C. The PL spectrum for 'RS-2' sample explained in the previous section indicates that the 2.11 eV peak originates due to radiative recombination in quantum-confined Ge nanocrystals. Two intense broad emission peaks are observed around 1.75 eV and 1.67 eV for samples 'RA' and 'RF', respectively. The difference in PL peak energy between the samples may be attributed to the variation in average particle size in combination with the matrix induced effect. In order to interpret the result quantitatively, a simple confinement model [5] has been applied by considering electrons and holes confined independently in quantum dots of radius R
Figure 4

Room-temperature photoluminescence from Ge nanocrystals embedded in HfO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , and SiO 2 matrix annealed at 900°C.

E n l = E g + 2 2 μ e - h ( α n l / R ) 2 - 1 . 786 e 2 / k R
where the second term represents the kinetic energy of electron and holes, and the last term denotes the Coulomb interaction term; μe-h is the reduced mass of excitons, k is the static dielectric constant (for Ge, k = 16.3), αnl is the eigenvalue of the zeroth-order spherical Bessel function (α10 = π), and the band gap energy (E g ) of Ge = 0.66 eV. Table 3 presents the calculated Ge nanocrystals size according to quantum confinement model using Equation 2 along with that estimated from TEM micrograph. From the Table 3, it is seen that there is a slight difference in the extracted size from the confinement theory and TEM observations. However, the carriers confined in the quantum dot in this case are under a finite potential, which has not been considered in the present confinement model. Depending upon the host oxide matrix, the conduction and valence band offsets between the germanium nanocrystals and matrix are different, which leads to surrounding matrix-dependent confinement potential [24]. The polarization interface charge-induced nanocrystal band gap modification may also play an important role due to the difference in dielectric constant of the host matrix and the nanocrystals [24]. Therefore, the present study shows an experimental evidence of the role of dielectric constant and band offsets on the optical band gap of Ge nanocrystals bounded in different oxide matrices.
Table 3

Size of Ge nanocrystals

Embedded matrixa

PL peak energy (eV)

dNC [confinement model] (nm)b

dNC (TEM) (nm)b

HfO2 ('RF')




Al2O3 ('RA')




SiO2 ('RS-2')




aGe nanocrystals embedded in different oxide matrices and bdNC, nanocrystal diameter; PL, photoluminescence; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; 'RF', 'RA', and 'RS-2', sample structures defined in Table 1.

Emission characteristics of Er-doped Ge nanocrystals

Though visible luminescence is observed from undoped Ge nanocrystals embedded in oxide matrix, rare earth-doped Ge nanocrystals are attractive for emission in fiber optic wavelength (1.54 μm). Er-doped (0.18 wt% Er) Ge nanocrystals (4-7 nm) fabricated by pulsed-laser deposition and annealed at 900°C have been studied for emission in the above wavelength range. Figure 5 shows the temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra of the Er-doped Ge nanocrystals in Al2O3 matrix showing the emission peak at 1.54 μm due to the intra-4f 4I13/24I15/2 transition (first excited state to the ground state) of Er atoms. From the figure, it is observed that as the temperature is decreased, the luminescence intensity corresponding to 1.54 μm emission is increased, and the peak is shifted slightly towards the lower wave lengths, indicating the origin of the PL peak to the transitions in Er3+ ions but not in defect states. The inset of the Figure 5 shows the temperature-dependent integrated intensity of the PL peak for 0.18 wt% Er-doped Ge nanocrystals embedded in Al2O3 matrix annealed at 900°C. The solid line in the inset is fitted using a double exponential function [25],
Figure 5

Temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra of Er-doped Ge nanocrystals embedded in Al 2 O 3 matrix. Inset picture shows the variation of normalized integral intensity of the PL peaks with temperature.

I P L ( T ) = I 0 1 + c 1 exp ( - E 1 / k B T ) + c 2 exp ( - E 2 / k B T )

I0 being the intensity at absolute zero temperature, E1 and E2 are the activation energies, and c1 and c2 are the corresponding coupling coefficients. At low temperatures (T < 75 K), the PL peak intensity is observed to be weakly temperature-dependent, with small thermal activation energy of 5.1 meV. With increase in temperature above 100 K, the PL peak intensity is observed to be quenched with large activation energy of 84.8 meV. It is suggested that the main energy transfer mechanism is the Förster mechanism [26], which is a nonoptical dipole-dipole interaction. Since the Förster mechanism is effective over several nanometres, it is likely that this mechanism is mainly responsible for the energy transfer from Ge nanocrystals to Er3+ ions.

Electroluminescence characteristics of undoped Ge nanocrystals

Electroluminescence characteristics due to the recombination of injected carriers into Ge nanocrystals can be employed to remove any ambiguity about the origin of light emission. MIS structures fabricated on Si with Si/Ge nanocrystals embedded in the dielectric layer [1, 2729] have been widely studied in this regard. A critical challenge for the MIS LED based on nanocrystals embedded in oxide has been the development of a method for efficient carrier injection. Therefore, the electroluminescence characteristics have been studied only for lower band gap high-k oxides. Under the positive gate bias, electron current from the Si conduction band is enhanced using high-k HfO2/Al2O3 as a blocking oxide. For the negative gate bias, the hole injection from the Si valance band can be enhanced, and the electron current from the gate electrode can be suppressed using high-k HfO2/Al2O3 as a blocking oxide. Figure 6 shows the room temperature EL spectra of MIS structure containing Ge nanocrystals embedded in HfO2 and Al2O3 matrices with injected current of 7 mA and 0.11 mA, respectively. The EL spectra are dependent on the polarity of the potential bias, and emission is observed only under a negative gate bias. The spectra show a broad emission in the visible and near infrared region. For HfO2 embedded Ge NCs ('RF') device, the EL spectrum can be fitted by three Gaussian peaks (red dotted line) centered at 1.38, 1.61, and 1.82 eV and having FWHM of 0.15, 0.18, and 0.54 eV, respectively. Similarly, the EL spectra of Al2O3 embedded Ge NCs ('RA') device consist of peaks centered at 1.42, 1.69, and 1.92 eV with FWHM of 0.15, 0.21, and 0.46 eV, respectively. The occurrence of more than one EL peak can be either due to the size distribution of the Ge NCs or to the different recombination mechanisms. From TEM analysis, it is observed that the size distribution is nearly Gaussian shaped. It seems that the second hypothesis is more appropriate in our case. Therefore, the most intense peaks at 1.61 eV for 'RF' sample and 1.69 eV for 'RA' sample are attributed to the electron hole recombination in Ge nanocrystals, in corroboration with photoluminescence results, though a peak shift is observed in EL either due to Stark effect or the sample heating at high injection. There are several reports of luminescence in the blue-green region with the peak energy independent of the size of the nanocrystals [8, 29]. Therefore, the observed weaker emission band around 1.82 and 1.92 eV originates due to radiative recombination through defects, which are located at the interface of the nanocrystals [26, 29]. The very weak peak at 1.4 eV is attributed to the oxygen related defects in GeO2.
Figure 6

Room-temperature electroluminescence spectra of MIS structure containing Ge nanocrystals. Embedded in (a) HfO2 and (b) Al2O3 matrix.

Memory characteristics of Ge nanocrystals in oxide matrices

Ge nanocrystals embedded in oxide matrices have potential applications in both flash-memory and light-emitting devices. From the electrical point of view, flash-memory structures with Ge nanocrystals embedded in dielectric layer have been proposed to improve the data retention with faster access speed. For future scaled-down complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor [CMOS] devices, various high-permittivity (k) dielectric (HfO2, Al2O3) materials have been suggested to replace the SiO2. Therefore, the electrical characteristics of new memory structures that are compatible with current CMOS process technology were investigated. Figure 7 presents the high-frequency (1 MHz) capacitance-voltage [C-V] characteristics of the MIS structures fabricated using Ge nanocrystals embedded in different dielectric matrices, for a voltage sweep of ± 7.5 V. The high-frequency C-V characteristics reveal significant hysteresis, indicating the charge storage in Ge nanocrystals. For SiO2 embedded ('RS-2') device, a small flat-band voltage shift [ΔVFB] of 0.55 V is observed. However, a large ΔV FB of 3.98, 4.66, and 5.88 V is observed for the Al2O3 embedded ('RA'), HfO2 embedded ('RF') and VARIOT structure (sample name: 'RFS'), respectively. From maximum ΔVFB, the stored charge density N charge has been calculated using [11] the following relation and the results are presented in Table 4.
Figure 7

Capacitance-voltage hysteresis behavior of the MIS structures containing Ge nanocrystals embedded in different dilectric matrices.

Table 4

Details of memory window and charge retention characteristics of different Ge NCs memory devices


ΔVFB at t= 0 (V)

Charge storage (cm-2)

ΔVFB after 10 years (V)

Charge loss after 10 years (%)



3.2 × 1010





7.6 × 1012





1.6 × 1013





2.1 × 1013



'RS-2', 'RA', 'RF', and 'RFS', sample structures defined in Table 1; ΔVFB, small flat-band voltage shift.

N c h a r g e = Δ V F B q ε 0 t C O ε C O + t N C ε N C
where ΔV FB is the flat-band voltage shift, q is the electronic charge; t CO and ε CO are the thickness and relative permittivity of the control oxide; t NC and ε NC are the diameter and relative permittivity of the nanocrystal; and ε 0 is the permittivity of the free space. The memory widow is found to be significantly increased for all the high-k oxide (Al2O3 and HfO2) samples as compared to SiO2 embedded one ('RS-2') under the same bias sweeping. By using a high-k dielectric in place of SiO2, a larger tunneling current is achieved in MIS structure due to the lower electron barrier height of HfO2 (1.2 eV) [30] as compared to SiO2 (3.1 eV). By using high-k dielectric as a gate oxide, under program mode, the electron current from the Si conduction band is enhanced, and under the erase mode, the hole current from the Si can be increased [15]. Similarly, the electron current from the gate electrode can be suppressed using high-k Al2O3 or HfO2 as a blocking oxide. The VARIOT ('RFS') sample consisting of 2.5-nm thick SiO2 followed by 5.0-nm thick HfO2 as the tunneling dielectric shows the maximum ΔVFB, the reason for which is discussed in the following sentences. Figure 8a, b shows the energy band diagrams including the valence band of the VARIOT structure in flat-band condition and under program mode, respectively. During writing process, when a sufficient voltage occurs across the SiO2 film (as shown in Figure 8b), it forces the conduction band edge of the Si substrate to be higher than the conduction band edge of HfO2. The tunneling current will then be mainly determined by strong direct tunneling contribution. On the other hand, the tunneling current density of a memory cell with single-layer tunnel HfO2 is determined by a much smaller Fowler-Nordheim current. This indicates that the program voltage will be less and the writing speed will be faster for the memory with VARIOT structure than that of a single HfO2 tunnel barrier. Due to the asymmetric stack structure of tunneling barrier of VARIOT device, the erasing speed of the VARIOT device may not be as fast as its writing speed.
Figure 8

Schematic energy band diagram of VARIOT memory device. At (a) flat-band condition and (b) under program mode.

Figure 9 shows the retention characteristics of different Ge NCs memory devices at room temperature. At first, the memory capacitor was programmed under a drive gate voltage of +7.5 V for 1 s. Then, the VFB was measured with time. Similarly, the memory capacitor was erased under a drive gate voltage of -7.5 V for 1 s, and the VFB was measured with time. The initial memory window width (ΔVFB) for all the samples is presented in Table 4. Assuming the logarithmic behavior for retention, the extrapolation of VFB shift for memory capacitor has been performed up to 10 years. After 10 years of retention, the estimated ΔVFB is presented in Table 4. The charge losses of the 'RS-2', 'RA', 'RF', and 'RFS' devices are estimated to be 47%, 33%, 37%, and 16%, respectively after 10 years of retention. The memory device with Al2O3 matrix shows better charge retention (33% loss) than that of HfO2 (37% loss) due to the larger band gap of Al2O3 (6.8 eV) [31] as a blocking oxide compared to HfO2 (5.8 eV) [32]. The VARIOT tunnel barrier memory device shows best retention properties compared to others. This result indicates that the SiO2 in the VARIOT structure plays a very important role because of the higher band offset during retention condition.
Figure 9

Retention characteristics of the MIS structures containing Ge nanocrystals embedded in different dielectric matrices.


In conclusion, we have reported a systematic study on the size- and host matrix-dependent photoluminescence characteristics of Ge nanocrystals showing the origin of visible luminescence due to the quantum confinement of charge carriers. This is corroborated by the broad visible electroluminescence characteristics from devices with Al2O3 and HfO2, attributed to the radiative recombination from Ge nanocrystals and also from the defect states. A two-stage quenching process has been observed from 1.54 μm emission characteristics of Er-doped Ge nanocrystals due to the energy transfer process between Er and Ge following Förster's mechanism. A large memory window of 5.88 V and high retention time of 16% charge loss per 10 years have been obtained in MIS structures using Ge nanocrystals floating gate with VARIOT tunneling barrier.





full width at half maxima


high-resolution transmission electron microscopy






quantum dots


scanning electron microscopy


variable oxide thickness


flat-band voltage.



The research at IIT Kharagpur is supported by DST-MBE, DRDO-FIR, and DST-ITPAR project grants, Government of India.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics and Meteorology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Dipartimento di Fisica, Laboratorio di Nanoscienze, Università di Trento


  1. Walters RJ, Bourianoff GI, Atwater HA: Field-effect electroluminescence in silicon nanocrystals. Nat Mater 2005, 4: 143. 10.1038/nmat1307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Salib M, Liao L, Jones R, Morse M, Liu A, Samara-Rubio D, Alduino D, Paniccia M: Silicon photonics. Intel Technol J 2004, 8: 143.Google Scholar
  3. Kanemitsu Y, Masumoto H, Uto Y, Maeda Y: On the origin of visible photoluminescence in nanometer-size Ge crystallites. Appl Phys Lett 1992, 61: 2187–2189. 10.1063/1.108290View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ray SK, Das K: Luminescence characteristics of Ge nanocrystals embedded in SiO2matrix. Opt Mater 2005, 27: 948–952. 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.08.041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Maeda Y: Visible photoluminescence from nanocrystallite Ge embedded in a glassy SiO2matrix: evidence in support of the quantum-confinement mechanism. Phys Rev B 1995, 51: 1658–1670. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.1658View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang XX, Zhang JG, Ding L, Cheng BW, Ge WK, Yu JZ, Wang QM: Origin and evolution of photoluminescence from Si nanocrystals embedded in a SiO2matrix. Phys Rev B 2005., 72: 195313–1-6 195313-1-6Google Scholar
  7. Canham LT: Silicon quantum wire array fabrication by electrochemical and chemical dissolution of wafers. Appl Phys Lett 1990, 57: 1046–1048. 10.1063/1.103561View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Min KS, Shcheglov KV, Yang CM, Atwater HA, Brongersma ML, Polman A: The role of quantum-confined excitons vs defects in the visible luminescence of SiO2films containing Ge nanocrystals. Appl Phys Lett 1996, 68: 2511–2513. 10.1063/1.115838View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Das S, Das K, Singha RK, Dhar A, Ray SK: Improved charge injection characteristics of Ge nanocrystals embedded in hafnium oxide for floating gate devices. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 233118–233120. 10.1063/1.2821114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenyon AJ: Recent developments in rare-earth doped materials for optoelectronics. Prog Quantum Electron 2002, 26: 225. 10.1016/S0079-6727(02)00014-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanafi HI, Tiwari S, Khan I: Fast and long retention-time nano-crystal memory. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 1996, 43: 1553. 10.1109/16.535349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nesher G, Kronik L, Chelikowsky JR: Ab initio absorption spectra of Ge nanocrystals. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 035344–035348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Das K, NandaGoswami M, Mahapatra R, Kar GS, Dhar A, Acharya HN, Maikap S, Lee J-H, Ray SK: Charge storage and photoluminescence characteristics of silicon oxide embedded Ge nanocrystal trilayer structures. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 84: 1386–1388. 10.1063/1.1646750View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang S, Riu W, Wan Q, Dai JY, Lee PF, Suhua L, Shen Q, Zhang M, Song Z, Lin C: Investigation of Ge nanocrytals in a metal-insulator-semiconductor structure with a HfO2/SiO2stack as the tunnel dielectric. Appl Phys Lett 2005., 86: 113105–1-3 113105-1-3Google Scholar
  15. Das S, Singha RK, Manna S, Gangopadhyay S, Dhar A, Ray SK: Microstrustural, chemical bonding, stress development and charge storage characteristics of Ge nanocrystals embedded in hafnium oxide. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13: 587–595. 10.1007/s11051-010-0054-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ray SK, Das S, Das K, Singha RK, Manna S, Dhar A: Structural and optical properties of germaniun nanostructures on Si (100) and embedded in high-k oxides. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011., 6: 224–1-10 224-1-10Google Scholar
  17. Kim D-W, Prins FE, Kim T, Hwang S, Lee CH, Kwong D-L, Banerjee SK: Reduction of charge-transport characteristics of SiGe dot floating gate memory device with ZrO2tunneling oxide. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 2003, 50: 510–513. 10.1109/TED.2002.804722View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Govoreanu B, Blomme P, Rosmeulen M, Van Houdt J, De Meyer K: VARIOT: a novel multilayer tunnel barrier concept for low-voltage nonvolatile memory devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2003, 24: 99. 10.1109/LED.2002.807694View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Y, Dey S, Tang S, Kelly DQ, Sarkar J, Banerjee SK: Improved performance of SiGe nanocrystal memory with VARIOT tunnel barrier. IEEE Trans On Electron Devices 2006, 53: 2598.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fukuda H, Kobayashi T, Endoh T, Ueda Y: Growth and characterization of Ge nanocrystals in ultrathin SiO2films. Appl Surf Sci 1998, 130: 776–780.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Weast RC, Lide DR, Astle MJ, Beyer WH (Eds): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data. 70th edition. Boca Raton: CRC; 1990.Google Scholar
  22. Zacharias M, Fauchet PM: Blue luminescence in films containing Ge and GeO2nanocrystals: the role of defects. Appl Phys Lett 1997, 71: 380–382. 10.1063/1.119543View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Das S, Singha RK, Gangopadhyay S, Dhar A, Ray SK: Microstrustural characteristics and phonon structures in luminescence from surface oxidized Ge nanocrystals embedded in HfO2matrix. J Appl Phys 2010., 108: 053510–1-7 053510-1-7Google Scholar
  24. Konakov AA, Burdow VA: Optical gap of silicon crystallities embedded in various wide-band amorphous matrices: role of environment. J Phys: Condens Matter 2010., 22: 215301–1-7 215301-1-7Google Scholar
  25. Palm J, Gan F, Zheng B, Michel J, Kimerling LC: Electroluminescence of erbium-doped Si. Phys Rev B 1996, 54: 17603. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17603View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. de Dood MJA, Knoester J, Tip A, Polman A: Förster transfer and the local optical density of states in erbium-doped silica. Phys Rev B 2005, 71: 115102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Das S, Manna S, Singha RK, Anopchenko A, Daldosso N, Pavesi L, Dhar A, Ray SK: Light emission and floating gate memory characteristics of germanium nanocrystals. Physica status solidi (a) 2011, 208: 635–638. 10.1002/pssa.201000408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Marconi A, Anopchenko A, Wang M, Pucker G, Bellutti P, Pavesi L: High power efficiency in Si-nc/SiO2multilayer light emitting devices by bipolar direct tunnelling. Appl Phys Lett 2009., 94: 221110–1-3 221110-1-3Google Scholar
  29. Chang S-T, Liao SH: Light emission and photoluminescence from high-k dielectrics containing Ge nanocrystals. J Vac Sci Technol B 2009, 27: 535–537. 10.1116/1.3025844View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu WJ, Ma T-P, Tamagawa T, Kim J, Di Y: Current transport in metal/hafnium oxide/silicon structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett 2002, 23: 97. 10.1109/55.981318View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gielis JJH, Hoex B, van de Sanden MCM, Kessels WMM: Negative charge and charging dynamics in Al2O3films on Si characterized by second-harmonic generation. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 073701. 10.1063/1.2985906View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Maikap S, Lee HY, Wang T-Y, Tzeng P-J, Wang CC, Lee LS, Liu KC, Yang J-R, Tsai M-J: Charge trapping characteristics of atomic-layer-deposited HfO2films with Al2O3as a blocking oxide for high-density non-volatile memory device applications. Semicond Sci Technol 2007, 22: 884. 10.1088/0268-1242/22/8/010View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Das et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.