Comparative studies on single-layer reduced graphene oxide films obtained by electrochemical reduction and hydrazine vapor reduction
© Wang et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 28 November 2011
Accepted: 29 February 2012
Published: 29 February 2012
The comparison between two kinds of single-layer reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets, obtained by reduction of graphene oxide (GO) with the electrochemical method and hydrazine vapor reduction, referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively, is systematically studied. Although there is no morphology difference between the E-rGO and C-rGO films adsorbed on solid substrates observed by AFM, the reduction process to obtain the E-rGO and C-rGO films is quite different. In the hydrazine vapor reduction, the nitrogen element is incorporated into the obtained C-rGO film, while no additional element is introduced to the E-rGO film during the electrochemical reduction. Moreover, Raman spectra show that the electrochemical method is more effective than the hydrazine vapor reduction method to reduce the GO films. In addition, E-rGO shows better electrocatalysis towards dopamine than does C-rGO. This study is helpful for researchers to understand these two different reduction methods and choose a suitable one to reduce GO based on their experimental requirements.
Graphene, a kind of two-dimensional carbon materials, has attracted increasing attention [1–3]. Recent studies proved that the graphene-related materials have excellent characteristics in various applications such as synthesis of hybrid materials [4–11], capacitors [12, 13], sensors [11, 14–20], electric devices [21–24], solar cells [25–27], drug delivery [28, 29], cell imaging , and cell cultures , etc. In order to produce large amount of graphene-related materials, the chemical methods are generally used [31–33].
Normally, graphene oxide (GO) is synthesized by the modified Hummers method [31–33], which is a strong oxidation method by using the concentrated sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate as oxidation agents. During the oxidation, the π-π electronic conjugation of graphite is destroyed, and the carbon sheets are decorated with the epoxide and hydroxyl groups in their basal planes as well as the carbonyl and carboxyl groups at their edges [34–36]. These functional groups render GO hydrophilic, facilitating the dispersion of GO in aqueous solution. After the reduction of GO with hydroquinone , NaBH4 , hydrazine hydrate , hydrazine vapor [31, 40–43], or hydrazine with NH3 , GO is deoxygenated and reduced GO (rGO] is obtained. However, these reducing agents, particularly hydrazine, are toxic, and the use of them should be with extreme care and minimized . In addition, the excessive reducing agents might contaminate the resulting product, i.e. rGO.
Recently, our group  and other groups [47–49] independently developed an electrochemical method to reduce GO, which is simple, fast, and green, as compared with the aforementioned chemical methods. More importantly, the highly negative potential used in the electrochemical method can overcome the energy barriers to efficiently reduce the oxygen-containing functional groups in GO .
Both the electrochemical reduction [20, 46–49] and hydrazine vapor reduction [31, 40–43, 50] can reduce GO to get electrochemically reduced GO (E-rGO) and chemically reduced GO (C-rGO), referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively. In this work, after a systematic study, we found that although the morphologies of single-layer E-rGO and C-rGO adsorbed on solid substrates are quite similar, their components and especially their electrocatalysis towards dopamine (DA) are quite different. Our experiment results showed that the amount of oxygen-containing functional groups in C-rGO is more than that in E-rGO, and the electrocatalysis of E-rGO towards DA is better than that of C-rGO.
Nature graphite was purchased from Bay Carbon (Bay City, Michigan, USA) and used for synthesizing GO. 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), H2O2 (30%), H2SO4 (98%), phosphate buffered saline, K4[Fe(CN)6] (99.9%), K3[Fe(CN)6] (99%), hexaammine ruthenium (III) chloride (98%), dopamine hydrochloride (99%), uric acid (UA) (≥ 99%), and hydrazine hydrate (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) and used as received. Ascorbic acid (AA) (≥ 99.5%, Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich), HCl (37%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), NH3·H2O (28%, J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), NaCl (99.5%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used as received. Toluene was purified from a solvent purification system (PS-400-5, innovative technology Inc, USA). Indium tin oxide (ITO) (10 ohm/sq, thickness, 0.7 mm) was purchased from Kintec Company (Hong Kong, China). Ultrapure Milli-Q water (Milli-Q System, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used in all experiments.
GO was synthesized based on our previous report . The obtained GO powder was dispersed in water with a certain concentration by sonication to get GO aqueous solution. The adsorptions of single-layer GO on APTES-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) , ITO , and SiO2 substrates [31, 50], referred to as GCE-APTES-GO, ITO-APTES-GO, and SiO2-APTES-GO, respectively, were prepared based on our previous reports. The obtained GCE-APTES-GO and ITO-APTES-GO electrodes were scanned in 0.5 M NaCl solution saturated with N2 from 0.7 to -1.1 V at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1 .
The GCE-APTES-GO, ITO-APTES-GO, and SiO2-APTES-GO electrodes were reduced by hydrazine vapor at 80°C overnight based on our previous report .
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained by using Dimension 3100 (Veeco, CA, USA) in tapping mode using Si tip (Veeco, resonant frequency, 320 kHz, Spring constant, 42 N m-1) under ambient conditions with a scanning rate of 1 Hz and scanning line of 512.
Raman spectra were recorded on a WITec CRM200 confocal Raman microscopy system using 633 nm laser with an air cooling charge-coupled device as detector (WITec Instrument Corp, Germany). Before measurement, the instrument was calibrated by silicon wafer.
All electrochemical measurements were carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell using CHI 660C Electrochemical Workstation (CHI instrument, Austin, TX, USA). In the experiment, GCE or ITO, platinum electrode, and Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode were used as working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. All the potentials shown in this work refer to the Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode.
Results and discussion
In order to study the GO and rGO films by AFM and Raman spectroscopy, single-layer GO was assembled on APTES-modified ITO and SiO2 substrates, referred to as ITO-APTES-GO and SiO2-APTES-GO, respectively, which then was reduced by electrochemical method and hydrazine vapor reduction (see the Experimental details). Figure S1 (see Additional file 1) shows AFM images of GO and rGO films. Although a few overlaps between single-layer GO or rGO films showed up, the morphologies of the GO films before and after reduction have not shown much difference.
The previous study reported that that new C-N bond appeared in C-rGO . But after the electrochemical reduction, no additional element was incorporated into the product of E-rGO [20, 46]. We believe that this difference arises from the different reduction methods.
The mechanism of hydrazine vapor reduction of the functional groups, e.g. ketone, in GO might follow the probable route as shown in Figure S2 (See Additional file 1) , which is different from the mechanism of the electrochemical reduction of GO proposed by Dong et al. who suggested that the hydrogen ions played an essential role in the electro-reduction process . In the process of hydrazine vapor reduction, the new C-N bond was introduced. But during the electrochemical reduction, the aromatic ketone, alcohol, benzylic alcohol, phenol, and aromatic carboxylic acid groups in GO might be reduced by the electrons from the extra power , and no new element was incorporated since no reducing agent, e.g. hydrazine, was used.
Unlike the hydrazine reduction, no extra element was introduced into E-rGO during the process of electrochemical reduction. The Raman spectroscopy of E-rGO is similar to the pristine graphene, which results in the G band shift to 1,587 cm-1. But after being kept in air for 1 day, E-rGO might be doped by the moisture or physisorbed oxygen . This p-doping was reflected by the upshift of G band . In order to reduce the effect of p-doping to E-rGO, the freshly prepared E-rGO was immediately used for the following experiments.
To probe negative charge amount present on the C-rGO and E-rGO surface, the C-rGO and E-rGO were evaluated by CV using [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- as indicators (Figure 3B). It has been reported that the voltammetry of [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- is sensitive to the surface functional groups, such as hydrogen and oxygen-containing groups, present in the carbon-based electrode . Therefore, in our experiment, [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- was chosen as an indicator to explore the properties of E-rGO and C-rGO. Figure 3B represents the typical CV curves of C-rGO (solid line) and E-rGO (dashed line) in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- solution containing 0.1 M KCl. The ΔEp of C-rGO and E-rGO are 82 and 73 mV, respectively. These ΔEp values indicate that the microstructural defects and density of electronic states near Fermi potential between C-rGO and E-rGO is different . Since only partial functional groups of GO have been reduced, negatively charged functional groups remain on the surface of rGO. As [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- is also negatively charged, the repulsion force between rGO and [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- reflects the amount of the negatively charged functional groups in rGO. From Figure 3B, it can be seen that the currents for C-rGO and E-rGO are 19 and 23 μA, respectively. Therefore, the amount of negatively charged groups in C-rGO is higher than those in E-rGO, confirming that the efficiency of hydrazine vapor reduction is lower than that of electrochemical reduction.
Single-layer rGO, obtained by electrochemical method (referred to as E-rGO) and hydrazine vapor reduction (referred to as C-rGO), respectively, was compared in morphology and the component change after reduction and electrocatalysis towards DA. In the hydrazine vapor reduction, nitrogen was incorporated into the product, while no additional element was introduced during the electrochemical reduction. After reduction, the morphology has not shown obvious difference between the single-layer GO and rGO films. However, the CV results indicate that the electrochemical method is more effective to reduce GO films than does the hydrazine vapor reduction method. In addition, the product E-rGO showed better electrocatalysis towards dopamine than does C-rGO. Our comparative study is helpful for researchers to understand these two reduction methods and choose a suitable one to reduce GO based on their experimental requirements.
This work was supported by MOE under AcRF Tier 2 (ARC 10/10, No. MOE2010-T2-1-060), the Singapore National Research Foundation under CREATE programme: Nanomaterials for Energy and Water Management, and NTU under the New Initiative Fund FY 2010 (M58120031) in Singapore.
- Novoselov KS, Gerim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306: 666. 10.1126/science.1102896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Yin Z, Wu S, Qi X, He Q, Zhang Q, Yan Q, Boey F, Zhang H: Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties and applications. Small 2011, 7: 1876. 10.1002/smll.201002009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H: Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41: 666. 10.1039/c1cs15078bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Li SZ, Huang YZ, Wu SX, Zhou XZ, Li SZ, Gan CL, Boey F, Mirkin CA, Zhang H: Synthesis of hexagonal close-packed gold nanostructures. Nat Commun 2011, 2: 292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi XY, Pu K-Y, Li H, Zhou XZ, Wu SX, Fan Q-L, Liu B, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: Amphiphilic graphene composites. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 49: 9426. 10.1002/anie.201004497View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Zhou XZ, Wu SX, Wei YY, Qi XY, Zhang J, Boey F, Zhang H: Reduced graphene oxide-templated photochemical synthesis and in situ assembly of Au nanodots to orderly patterned Au nanodot chains. Small 2010, 6: 513. 10.1002/smll.200902001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi XY, Pu K-Y, Zhou XZ, Li H, Liu B, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: Conjugated-polyelectrolyte-functionalized reduced graphene oxide with excellent solubility and stability in polar solvents. Small 2010, 6: 663. 10.1002/smll.200902221View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao XH, He QY, Shi WH, Zeng ZY, Shi YM, Yan QY, Zhang H: Graphene oxide as carbon source for controlled growth of carbon nanowires. Small 2011, 7: 1199. 10.1002/smll.201100071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng LL, Gao G, Huang P, Wang XS, Zhang CL, Zhang JL, Guo SW, Cui DX: Preparation of Pt Ag alloy nanoisland/graphene hybrid composites and its high stability and catalytic activity in methanol electro-oxidation. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 551. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhandari S, Deepa M, Joshi AG, Saxena AP, Srivastava AK: Revelation of graphene-Au for direct write deposition and characterization. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 424. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-424View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dong XC, Huang W, Chen P: In Situ Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Gold Nanocomposites for Nanoelectronics and Biosensing. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao XH, Shi YM, Shi WH, Lu G, Huang X, Yan QY, Zhang QC, Zhang H: Preparation of novel three dimensional graphene networks for supercapacitor applications. Small 2011, 7: 3163. 10.1002/smll.201100990View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stoller MD, Park SJ, Zhu YW, An JH, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based ultracapacitors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3498. 10.1021/nl802558yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ang PK, Chen W, Wee ATS, Loh KP: Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 14392. 10.1021/ja805090zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sudibya HG, He QY, Zhang H, Chen P: Electrical detection of metal ions using field-effecttransistors based on micropatterned reduced graphene oxide films. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 1990. 10.1021/nn103043vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Q, Wu S, Gao S, Cao X, Yin Z, Li H, Chen P, Zhang H: Transparent, flexible, all-reduced graphene oxide thin film transistors. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 5038. 10.1021/nn201118cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Q, Sudibya HG, Yin Z, Wu S, Li H, Boey F, Huang W, Chen P, Zhang H: Centimeter-long and large-scale micropatterns of reduced graphene oxide films: fabrication and sensing applications. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 3201. 10.1021/nn100780vView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yin ZY, Huang X, Zhang J, Wu SX, Chen P, Lu G, Chen P, Zhang QC, Yan QY, Zhang H: Real-time DNA detection using Pt nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide field-effect transistors. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 293. 10.1039/c1nr11149cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu G, Li H, Liusman C, Yin Z, Wu S, Zhang H: Surface enhanced raman scattering of Ag nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide for detection of aromatic molecules. Chem Sci 2011, 2: 1817. 10.1039/c1sc00254fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Zhang J, Chen P, Zhou X, Yang Y, Wu S, Niu L, Han Y, Wang L, Chen P, Boey F, Zhang Q, Liedberg B, Zhang H: Label-free, electrochemical detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus DNA with reduced graphene oxide-modified electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron 2011, 26: 3881. 10.1016/j.bios.2011.03.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bunch JS, van der Zande AM, Verbridge SS, Frank IW, Tanenbaum DM, Parpia JM, Craighead HG, McEuen PL: Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets. Science 2007, 315: 490. 10.1126/science.1136836View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu JQ, Yin ZY, Cao XH, Zhao F, Ling A, Xie LH, Fan QL, Boey F, Zhang H, Huang W: Bulk heterojunction polymer memory devices with reduced graphene oxide as electrodes. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 3987. 10.1021/nn100877sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li B, Cao X, Ong HG, Cheah JW, Zhou X, Yin Z, Li H, Wang J, Boey F, Huang W, Zhang H: All-carbon electronic devices fabricated by directly grown single-walled carbon nanotubes on reduced graphene oxide electrodes. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 3058. 10.1002/adma.201000736View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu JQ, Lin Z, Liu T, Yin Z, Zhou XZ, Chen S, Xie LH, Boey F, Zhang H, Huang W: Multilayer-stacked, low temperature-reduced graphene oxide films: preparation, characterization and application in polymer memory devices. Small 2010, 6: 1536. 10.1002/smll.201000328View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yin Z, Wu S, Zhou X, Huang X, Zhang Q, Boey F, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of ZnO nanorods on transparent reduced graphene oxide electrodes for hybrid solar cells. Small 2010, 6: 307. 10.1002/smll.200901968View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yin ZY, Sun S, Salim T, Wu SX, Huang X, He QY, Lam YM, Zhang H: Organic photovoltaic devices using highly flexible reduced graphene oxide films as transparent electrodes. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 5263. 10.1021/nn1015874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song JL, Yin ZY, Yang ZJ, Amaladass P, Wu SX, Ye J, Zhao Y, Deng WQ, Zhang H, Liu XW: Enhancement of photogenerated-electron transport in dye-sensitized solar cells with introduction of reduced graphene oxide-TiO2junction. Chem Eur J 2011, 17: 10832. 10.1002/chem.201101263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Z, Robinson JT, Sun XM, Dai HJ: PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 10876. 10.1021/ja803688xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun XM, Liu Z, Welsher K, Robinson JT, Goodwin A, Zaric S, Dai HJ: Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res 2008, 1: 203. 10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agarwal S, Zhou X, Ye F, He Q, Chen GCK, Soo J, Boey F, Zhang H, Chen P: Interfacing live cells with nanocarbon substrates. Langmuir 2010, 26: 2244. 10.1021/la9048743View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou XZ, Huang X, Qi XY, Wu SX, Xue C, Boey FYC, Yan QY, Zhang H: In-situ synthesis of metal nanoparticles on single-layer graphene oxide surface. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 10842. 10.1021/jp903821nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442: 282. 10.1038/nature04969View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hummers WS, Offeman RE: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958, 80: 1339. 10.1021/ja01539a017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szabo T, Berkesi O, Dekany I: DRIFT study of deuterium-exchanged graphite oxide. Carbon 2005, 43: 3186. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cote LJ, Kim F, Huang JX: Langmuir-blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 1043. 10.1021/ja806262mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stankovich S, Piner RD, Chen XQ, Wu NQ, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS: Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). J Mater Chem 2006, 16: 155. 10.1039/b512799hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang GX, Yang J, Park J, Gou XL, Wang B, Liu H, Yao J: Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 8192. 10.1021/jp710931hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lomeda JR, Doyle CD, Kosynkin DV, Hwang W-F, Tour JM: Diazonium functionalization of surfactant-wrapped chemically converted graphene sheets. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 16201. 10.1021/ja806499wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST: Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007, 45: 1558. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson JT, Perkins FK, Snow ES, Wei ZQ, Sheehan PE: Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3137. 10.1021/nl8013007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu SX, Yin ZY, He QY, Huang X, Zhou XZ, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of semiconductor oxides on reduced graphene oxide-based flexible, transparent and conductive electrodes. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 11816. 10.1021/jp103696uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou XZ, Wei YY, He QY, Boey F, Zhang QC, Zhang H: Reduced graphene oxide films used as matrix of MALDI-TOF-MS for detection of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Chem Commun 2010, 46: 6974. 10.1039/c0cc01681kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu SX, Yin ZY, He QY, Zhou XZ, Zhang H: Electrochemical deposition of Cl-doped n-type Cu2O on reduced graphene oxide electrodes. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 3467. 10.1039/c0jm02267eView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Muller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallance GG: Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nature Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 101. 10.1038/nnano.2007.451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan XB, Peng WC, Li Y, Li XY, Wang SL, Zhang GL, Zhang FB: Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang ZJ, Zhou XZ, Zhang J, Boey F, Zhang H: Direct electrochemical reduction of single-layer graphene oxide and subsequent functionalization with glucose oxidase. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 14071. 10.1021/jp906348xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo H-L, Wang X-F, Qian Q-Y, Wang F-B, Xia X-H: A green approach to the synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 2653. 10.1021/nn900227dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou M, Wang Y, Zhai YM, Zhai JF, Ren W, Wang FA, Dong SJ: Controlled synthesis of large-area and patterned electrochemically reduced graphene oxide films. Chem Eur J 2009, 15: 6116. 10.1002/chem.200900596View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramesha GK, Sampath S: Electrochemical reduction of oriented graphene oxide films: an in situ raman spectroelectrochemical study. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 7985. 10.1021/jp811377nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Lv G, Qi XY, Wu S, Li H, Boey F, Zhang H: A method for fabrication of graphene oxide nanoribbons from graphene oxide wrinkles. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 19119. 10.1021/jp9079298View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lάszlό K, Czakό B: Strategic Applications of Named Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Elsevier Academic Press; 2005:496.Google Scholar
- Stratmann M, Bard AJ: Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry. WILEY-VCH; 2004:199.Google Scholar
- Dong XC, Fu DL, Fang W, Shi YM, Chen P, Li L-J: Doping single-layer graphene with aromatic molecules. Small 2009, 5: 1422. 10.1002/smll.200801711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alwarappan S, Erdem A, Liu C, Li C-Z: Probing the electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheets for biosensing applications. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 8853. 10.1021/jp9010313View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou M, Zhai Y, Dong S: Electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform based on chemically reduced graphene oxide. Anal Chem 2009, 81: 5603. 10.1021/ac900136zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pumera M: Electrochemistry of graphene: new horizons for sensing and energy storage. Chem Rec 2009, 9: 211. 10.1002/tcr.200900008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.