Open Access

Fabrication and characterization of WO3/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent anode with solution-processed WO3 for polymer light-emitting diodes

  • Kangmin Jeon1,
  • Hongseok Youn1,
  • Seongbeom Kim1,
  • Seongbeom Shin1 and
  • Minyang Yang1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:253

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-253

Received: 12 February 2012

Accepted: 20 April 2012

Published: 15 May 2012


The dielectric/metal/dielectric multilayer is suitable for a transparent electrode because of its high-optical and high-electrical properties; however, it is fabricated by an expensive and inefficient multistep vacuum process. We present a WO3/Ag/WO3 (WAW) multilayer transparent anode with solution-processed WO3 for polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs). This WAW multilayer not only has high transmittance and low resistance but also can be easily and rapidly fabricated. We devised a novel method to deposit a thin WO3 layer by a solution process in an air environment. A tungstic acid solution was prepared from an aqueous solution of Na2WO4 and then converted to WO3 nanoparticles (NPs) by a thermal treatment. Thin WO3 NP layers form WAW multilayer with a thermal-evaporated Ag layer, and they improve the transmittance of the WAW multilayer because of its high transmittance and refractive index. Moreover, the surface of the WO3 layer is homogeneous and flat with low roughness because of the WO3 NP generation from the tungstic acid solution without aggregation. We performed optical simulation and experiments, and the optimized WAW multilayer had a high transmittance of 85% with a sheet resistance of 4 Ω/sq. Finally, PLEDs based on the WAW multilayer anode achieved a maximum luminance of 35,550 cd/m2 at 8 V, and this result implies that the solution-processed WAW multilayer is appropriate for use as a transparent anode in PLEDs.


Multilayer Transparent anode WO3 Polymer light-emitting diodes


Recently, polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) have been studied as next-generation light sources because they have high luminous efficiency and can be fabricated by an efficient solution process for high productivity [13]. However some layers of PELDs (the electron injection layer, cathode and anode) must be deposited by an expensive vacuum process; only the emitting and hole injection layers are coated by a solution process. Therefore, researchers have investigated extending the solution-processed layers [46]. The development of a solution-processed transparent electrode is particularly important because it is a fundamental component of organic electronics.

Indium tin oxide (ITO) is commonly used as the transparent anode for PLEDs because of its combination of high optical transmittance (>85% in the wavelength range of visible light) and low resistance (approximately 10 Ω/sq) [7]. However, ITO has some disadvantages. The supply of indium is constrained by both mining and geopolitical issues, and ITO must be deposited by a vacuum process that is expensive to set up and maintain. Therefore, researchers have investigated solution-processed transparent anodes such as conducting polymers and carbon nanotube films [812]. These anodes can be inexpensively coated by a solution process in an air environment, but their sheet resistances are ten times higher than that of ITO while their transmittance is similar [8, 11]. Thus, conducting polymers and carbon nanotube films are unsuitable as transparent anodes for PLEDs.

Fan et al. reported dielectric/metal/dielectric (DMD) multilayers such as TiO2/Ag/TiO2[13], InZnO/Ag/InZnO [14], ZnS/Ag/ZnS [1517], WO3/Ag/WO3 (WAW) [18], or ZnS/Ag/WO3[19, 20] as transparent anodes. A DMD multilayer has low sheet resistance in the metal layer (approximately 5 Ω/sq) and high transmittance (>85%) because the refractive index discrepancy between the dielectric layers and the thin metal layer improves the transmittance of the metal layer [21]. However, it has low productivity because the vacuum process for a conventional DMD multilayer requires a high-degree vacuum for an extended time and has a limited chamber volume. This problem could be overcome by using a solution process. When dielectric layers are coated by a solution process, the productivity of the DMD multilayer is greatly improved, because the dielectrics form two layers in a DMD multilayer consisting of three layers. However, it is difficult to coat a thin and uniform dielectric layer using conventional sol-gel or nanoparticle (NP) solutions [2224].

WO3 is one of the most suitable dielectric materials for the DMD multilayer. It has a high refractive index (n = 2.0 at wavelength of 580 nm) and high transmittance (>90% in the wavelength range of visible light) as well as high electrical conductivity [20]. However, in the conventional solution process WO3 has high surface roughness and too large particle size to form a dielectric layer thinner than 100 nm [25, 26].

In this work, we develop a WO3/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent anode with solution-processed WO3 for PLEDs. To coat thin WO3 layers by a solution process, we devise a novel method wherein WO3 NPs are synthesized from a precursor solution by rapid conversion that obstructs the growth of particles. Thin WO3 NP layers form WAW multilayer with a thermal evaporated Ag layer, and they improve the transmittance of the WAW multilayer without degradation of the Ag conductivity. The solution-processed WAW multilayer has excellent optical and electrical properties and higher productivity than the conventional multilayer because it can be fabricated by a high volume printing technologies. The optimal structure of the WAW multilayer is calculated by optical simulation, and the results are verified by comparison with experimental values. Finally, we evaluate the luminance of PLEDs based on the WAW multilayer transparent anode.


Fabrication of solution-processed WAW multilayer

To synthesize WO3, sodium tungstate (Na2WO4) was dissolved in deionized water without further purification. Its aqueous solution was passed at a fixed rate through a glass column packed with protonated cation exchange resin (TRILRTE SCR-BH), and the yellow effluent containing tungstic acid (H2WO4) was collected in a beaker, as shown in Figure 1[27, 28]. The tungstic acid solution was mixed with isopropyl alcohol to improve the coating quality and then spin-coated on a glass substrate. The resulting thin layer was baked at 200°C to convert the tungstic acid to WO3. Subsequently, Ag (99.99%) was thermally evaporated on the WO3 layer in a high-vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 2 × 10−6 Torr. Finally, the tungstic acid solution was spin-coated on the Ag layer again and baked to complete the WAW multilayer as shown in Figure 2a. The thicknesses of the layers were measured by a surface profiler (Ahpha-Step 500, KLA-Tencor, Milpitas, CA, USA). The sheet resistance and optical transmittance were measured by the four-point probe technique (CMT-SR2000N, AIT, Gyeongi, South Korea) and a UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (V-570, JASCO Inc., Easton, MD, USA), respectively.
Figure 1

Synthesis of WO 3 nanoparticles from aqueous solution of Na 2 WO 4 . Surface of WO3 layer was investigated through field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM).
Figure 2

Illustrations of WAW multilayer and WAW-based PLEDs. (a) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of solution-processed WAW multilayer. (b) Schematic structure of WAW/PEDOT:PSS/Super Yellow/ZnO NPs and ionic interlayer/Al PLEDs.

Fabrication of PLEDs on WAW multilayer anode

The PLEDs on the WAW multilayer anode were composed of layers of glass, the WAW multilayer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) (50 nm, PEDOT:PSS; Clevios P VP AI4083, Heraeus Precious Metal, Hanau, Germany), yellow light-emitting polymer (60 nm, ‘super yellow’ (SY), Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA), ZnO NPs and ionic interlayer (20 nm, polyethylene oxide + tetra-n-butylammonium tetrafluoroborate), and Al, as shown in Figure 2b. The layers of WO3, PEDOT:PSS, super yellow, and ZnO NPs and the ionic interlayer were all fabricated by spin-coating, whereas the Ag and Al electrodes were thermally evaporated. PLEDs on a conventional ITO anode were fabricated as control devices for comparison. The resulting active area of each PLED is approximately 4.4 mm2. After the fabrication, the devices were measured without further encapsulations in air. The device characteristics of the current density, voltage, and luminance (J-V-L) curves were recorded with a source-measure unit (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) and a calibrated photodiode (CS-100A, Konica Minolta Optics, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

Results and discussion

Preparation of solution-processed WO3

We passed an aqueous solution of Na2WO4 through a protonated cation exchange resin. The Na+ ions were replaced with H+ ions by the exchange resin, and we collected tungstic acid consisting of H+ and WO42− ions. The tungstic acid was converted to WO3 ·2H2O as a primary product, and then WO3 ·2H2O was calcined at 200°C for conversion to WO3 as a secondary product [28].

The WO3 ·2H2O particles were slowly synthesized from tungstic acid at room temperature, and the slow synthesis increased the particle size. Hence, the WO3 derived from these WO3 ·2H2O particles had irregular square plates with widths of 500 to 1,000 nm and thicknesses of 200 to 500 nm. Figure 3a shows a FESEM image of the WO3 particles. These large WO3 particles cannot form thin dielectric layers; a DMD multilayer is generally required to be thinner than 100 nm. To form a thin WO3 layer, we devised a new method that synthesized tiny WO3 NPs. The tungstic acid solution was coated on a glass and then baked at 200°C for rapid conversion and calcination. The rapid conversion obstructed the growth of WO3 ·2H2O particles, and WO3 NPs were synthesized from the WO3 ·2H2O particles after a calcination process. Figure 3b shows a TEM image of WO3 NPs less than 2 nm in size synthesized by the new synthesis method. Because these WO3 NPs are sufficiently small, the thickness of the WO3 layer can be controlled by adjusting the concentration and the coating condition of the tungstic acid solution in an air environment. Therefore, these WO3 NPs can form a thin dielectric layer to optimize the optical properties of the WAW multilayer.
Figure 3

Comparison of WO 3 particles. (a) FESEM image of WO3 particles from conventional synthesis method. (b) TEM image of WO3 NPs less than 2 nm in size by the rapid conversion.

This method has another advantage. Because the WO42− ions in tungstic acid were completely dissolved in deionized water, this aqueous solution could coat a uniform thin layer on the substrate without aggregation. The morphology of the WO3 layer was investigated by atomic force microscope (AFM; XE-100, Park Systems Corporation, Suwon, South Korea). Figure 4a shows that the surface of the WO3 layer was homogeneous and flat, with a low roughness (root mean square (rms) roughness = 0.457 nm, peak-to-valley roughness = 3.778 nm]. This WO3 layer with excellent surface quality can form WAW multilayer which has lower surface roughness than conventional transparent anode.
Figure 4

Properties of WO 3 layer. (a) Atomic force microscope (AFM) image of solution-processed WO3 layer surface. (b) Comparison of XRD patterns of WO3 NPs synthesized from an aqueous solution of Na2WO4 and monoclinic phase of WO3. (c) Real part (n) and imaginary part (k) of complex refractive index of WO3 layer.

To verify the conversion of WO3 ·2H2O to WO3, we observed the crystallization of the WO3 NPs using an X-ray diffractometer (RIGAKU D/MAX-2500, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo Japan). Solution-processed WO3 should be pure without WO3 ·2H2O. WO3 ·2H2O reduces the hole and the electron mobility of the dielectric layer of the WAW multilayer anode as impurity, and the low hole and electron mobility cause high turn-on voltage of PLEDs [16]. Figure 4b shows the XRD pattern of the solution-processed WO3. The typical sharp peaks of the monoclinic phase of WO3 are recognizable in the XRD pattern. This suggests that most of the WO3 ·2H2O is converted to WO3, and solution-processed WO3 is formed as a crystalline phase. Figure 4c shows the real part (n) and imaginary part (k) of complex refractive indices of the solution-processed WO3 layer. A 45-nm thick WO3 layer has higher refractive index than 2.0 in the wavelength range of visible light as in the case of a WO3 layer deposited using the evaporation process [19].

Properties of WAW multilayer

We fabricated a WAW multilayer with solution-processed WO3 and investigated its optical and electrical properties as a transparent electrode. The transmittance of the multilayer is a function of the thicknesses and refractive indices of the materials [21]. Since the refractive indices of WO3 and Ag are fixed, the transmittance is determined by the thicknesses of the layers. It has been reported that a Ag layer has optimal electrical and optical properties when its thickness is 15 nm [14, 16, 19]. Therefore, the transmittance of the WAW multilayer should be optimized by controlling the thickness of the bottom and top WO3 layers.

To optimize the structure of the WAW multilayer, we calculated its transmittance by a transfer matrix method. Figure 5a shows the calculated transmittance at a wavelength of 580 nm for different thicknesses of the bottom and top WO3 layers. The WAW multilayer had a maximum transmittance of 85% when the bottom and top WO3 layers were 49 and 45 nm, respectively. Table 1 shows the measured sheet resistance and transmittance of the Ag, ITO, and WAW multilayers. As the thickness of the top WO3 layer increased from 0 to 60 nm with the thickness of the bottom WO3 layer kept constant, the optical properties of samples 1 to 5 changed; however, all the samples had the same sheet resistance. These results indicate that the WO3 layers improve the transmittance without decreasing the Ag conductivity by the tungstic acid solution. Figure 5b shows the transmittance spectra of the samples of Table 1 in the visible range, and Figure 5c shows the transmittance variation of the calculated and experimental results at a wavelength of 580 nm. Sample 4 with WO3 (45 nm)/Ag (15 nm)/WO3 (45 nm) had the best transmittance (85%). This result indicates that the experimental transmittance is consistent with the calculated result.
Figure 5

Transmittance of WAW multilayer. (a) Calculated transmittance of WAW multilayers at wavelength of 580 nm for different thicknesses of bottom and top WO3 layers. (b) Transmittance spectra of WAW multilayers of Table 1 in visible range. (c) Transmittance variation of calculated and experimental results at wavelength of 580 nm.

Table 1

Transmittance and sheet resistance of Ag, ITO, and WAW multilayers.



Transmittance (% at 580 nm)

Sheet resistance (Ω/sq)


Ag 15 nm


approximately 4


WO3 45 nm/Ag 15 nm/WO3 15 nm


approximately 4


WO3 45 nm/Ag 15 nm/WO3 30 nm


approximately 4


WO3 45 nm/Ag 15 nm/WO3 45 nm


approximately 4


WO3 45 nm/Ag 15 nm/WO3 60 nm


approximately 4


ITO 150 nm


approximately 13

Figure 6 shows the morphologies of the WAW multilayer and ITO measured by AFM. The rms surface roughness and peak-to-valley roughness of the WAW multilayer were 0.588 and 5.290 nm, respectively, and those of ITO were 2.773 and 22.548 nm, respectively. The WAW multilayer had a homogeneous and flat surface which is quite smooth compared to the surface of ITO. The surface roughness of the WAW multilayer anode is an important factor limiting the performance of PLEDs because thin layers of PEDOT:PSS and a light-emitting polymer (SY) must be in direct contact on the anode [6].
Figure 6

Comparison of morphologies of WAW multilayer and ITO. AFM image and surface roughness (root mean square and peak-to-valley) of solution-processed WAW multilayer and conventional ITO. Rrms, rms surface roughness; Rpv, peak-to-valley roughness.

Consequently, the solution-processed WAW multilayer had a sheet resistance of 4 Ω/sq, an rms of 0.588 nm, and a transmittance of 85%, which is considerably high as compared to the 50% transmittance of a Ag layer. As a transparent anode for PLEDs, the solution-processed WAW multilayer is superior to ITO. This is because the WAW multilayer has better electrical conductivity and surface roughness than ITO, although its transmittance is slightly lower.

Performance of PLEDs based on solution-processed WAW anodes

To evaluate the electrical and optical properties of the WAW multilayer as a transparent anode, we fabricated PLEDs based on the optimized WAW multilayer anode and the conventional ITO anode. The layer structure of the PLEDs was as follows: WAW multilayer/PEDOT:PSS/Super Yellow/ZnO NPs and ionic interlayer/Al. Figure 7 shows J-V-L characteristics of the WAW-based and ITO-based PLEDs. The turn-on voltages were identical (2.1 V). This implies that the hole-injection behavior of the solution-processed WAW multilayer was as good as that of ITO with the vacuum process because the turn-on voltage is one of the factors measuring the hole-injection property of an electrode [15, 20]. The maximum luminance of the WAW-based PLEDs reached 35,550 cd/m2 at 8 V, whereas ITO-based PLEDs had a maximum luminance of 15,095 cd/m2 at 8 V. The maximum luminous efficiency of the WAW-based PLEDs (6.24 cd/A) was also higher than that of the ITO-based PLEDs (6.10 cd/A) as shown in Figure 8. These results indicate that the solution-processed WAW multilayer transparent anode is superior to ITO anode. The high conductivity of the WAW multilayer and the good contact quality of the WAW/PEDOT:PSS interface resulting from the low surface roughness of the WAW multilayer improve the performance of PLEDs [14].
Figure 7

Luminance characteristics of PLEDs. Comparison of (a) luminance-voltage (L–V) and (b) current density-voltage (J–V) characteristics of ITO-based and WAW-based PLEDs.
Figure 8

Comparison of luminous efficiency of ITO-based and WAW-based PLEDs. Inset shows photograph of WAW-based PLED in operation.


We have demonstrated the applicability of a highly productive WAW multilayer anode formed by a solution process as an alternative to conventional ITO anodes for PLEDs. To coat a thin and uniform WO3 layer by a solution process, we devised a new method in which WO3 NPs less than 2 nm in size were synthesized from an aqueous solution of Na2WO4. We then analyzed the crystallization characteristics of the WO3 NPs and the morphology of the WO3 NP layer. The solution-processed WAW multilayer, which was optimized via a simulations and experiments, had a sheet resistance of 4 Ω/sq and a transmittance of 85% at a wavelength of 580 nm. Moreover, WAW-based PLEDs had a maximum luminance of 35,550 cd/m2 at 8 V and a luminous efficiency of 6.24 cd/A. They were superior to ITO-based PLEDs because of the high conductivity of the WAW multilayer and the good contact quality of the WAW/PEDOT:PSS interface. Therefore, a solution-processed WAW multilayer is appropriate for both large-area displays and lighting applications because of its high productivity and excellent performance as a transparent electrode.



This work was supported by grant no. EEWS-2011-N01110035 from Energy, Environment, Water, and Sustainability (EEWS) Research Project of the office of KAIST EEWS Initiative.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology


  1. Al-Attar HA, Monkman AP: Solution processed multilayer polymer light-emitting diodes based on different molecular weight host. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 074516. 10.1063/1.3569831View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tseng S, Meng H, Lee K, Horng S: Multilayer polymer light-emitting diodes by blade coating method. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 153308. 10.1063/1.2999541View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung D, Huang J, Bradley DDC, Campbell AJ: High performance, flexible polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) with gravure contact printed hole injection and light emitting layers. Org Electron 2010, 11: 1088–1095. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.03.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Youn H, Yang M: Solution processed polymer light-emitting diodes utilizing a ZnO/organic ionic interlayer with Al cathode. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 243302. 10.1063/1.3526308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang J, Li G, Wu E, Xu Q, Yang Y: Achieving high-efficiency polymer white-light-emitting devices. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 114–117. 10.1002/adma.200501105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolink HJ, Coronado E, Repetto D, Sessolo M, Barea EM, Bisquert J, Garcia-Belmonte G, Prochazka J, Kavan L: Inverted solution processable OLEDs using a metal oxide as an electron injection contact. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18: 145–150. 10.1002/adfm.200700686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wantz G, Hirsch L, Huby N, Vignau L, Silvain JF, Barriére AS, Parneix JP: Correlation between the Indium Tin Oxide morphology and the performances of polymer light-emitting diodes. Thin Solid Films 2005, 485: 247–251. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.03.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao Y, Yu G, Zhang C, Menon R, Heeger AJ: Polymer light-emitting diodes with polyethylene dioxythiophene–polystyrene sulfonate as the transparent anode. Synth Met 1997, 87: 171–174. 10.1016/S0379-6779(97)03823-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang G, Tao X, Wang R: Flexible organic light-emitting diodes with a polymeric nanocomposite anode. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 145201. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/14/145201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Na S, Kim S, Jo J, Kim D: Efficient and flexible ITO-free organic solar cells using highly conductive polymer anodes. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 4061–4067. 10.1002/adma.200800338View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang D, Ryu K, Liu X, Polikarpov E, Ly J, Tompson ME, Zhou C: Transparent, conductive, and flexible carbon nanotube films and their application in organic light-emitting diodes. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 1880–1886. 10.1021/nl0608543View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Maksimenko I, Kilian D, Mehringer C, Voigt M, Peukert W, Wellmann PJ: Fabrication, charge carrier transport, and application of printable nanocomposites based on indium tin oxide nanoparticles and conducting polymer 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene/polystyrene sulfonic acid. J Appl Phys 2011, 110: 104301. 10.1063/1.3658634View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan JCC, Bachner FJ, Foley GH, Zavracky PM: Transparent heat-mirror films of TiO2/Ag/TiO2 for solar energy collection and radiation insulation. Appl Phys Lett 1974, 25: 693–695. 10.1063/1.1655364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeong J, Lee J, Kim H: Inverted OLED with Low Resistance IZO–Ag–IZO top anode prepared by linear FTS system at room temperature. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett 2009, 12: J105-J108. 10.1149/1.3207874View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pang H, Yuan Y, Zhou Y, Lian J, Cao L, Zhang J, Zhou X: ZnS/Ag/ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes. J Lumin 2007, 122–123: 587–589.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu X, Cai X, Qiao J, Mao J, Jiang N: The design of ZnS/Ag/ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films. Thin Solid Films 2003, 441: 200–206. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00141-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Leng J, Yu Z, Xue W, Zhang T, Jiang Y, Zhang J, Zhang D: Influence of Ag thickness on structural, optical, and electrical properties of ZnS/Ag/ZnS multilayers prepared by ion beam assisted deposition. J Appl Phys 2010, 108: 073109. 10.1063/1.3490787View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryu SY, Noh JH, Hwang BH, Kim CS, Jo SJ, Kim JT, Hwang HS, Baik HK, Jeong HS, Lee CH, Song SY, Choi SH, Park SY: Transparent organic light-emitting diodes consisting of a metal oxide multilayer cathode. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 023306. 10.1063/1.2835044View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cho H, Yun C, Yoo S: Multilayer transparent electrode for organic light-emitting diodes: tuning its optical characteristics. Opt Express 2010, 18: 3404–3414. 10.1364/OE.18.003404View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cho H, Yun C, Park JW, Yoo S: Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes. Org Electron 2009, 10: 1163–1169. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.06.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Macleod HA: Thin-Film Optical Filters. Macmillan Publisher Company, New York; 1986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinz P, Dislich H: Anti-reflecting light-scattering coating via the sol–gel procedure. J Non-Cryst Solids 1986, 82: 411–416. 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90158-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Özer N: Optical and electrochemical characteristics of sol–gel deposited tungsten oxide films: a comparison. Thin Solid Films 1997, 304: 310–314. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00218-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu I, Isobe T, Senna M: Optical properties and characteristics of ZnS nano-particles with homogeneous Mn distribution. J Phys Chem Solids 1996, 57: 373–379. 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00285-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shannigrahi S, Yao K: Structure and properties of WO3-doped Pb0.97 La0.03(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 ferroelectric thin films prepared by a sol–gel process. J Appl Phys 2005, 98: 034104. 10.1063/1.1999834View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim C, Lee M, Kim E: WO3 thin film coating from H2O-controlled peroxotungstic acid and its electrochromic properties. J Sol–gel, Sci Technol 2010, 53: 176–183. 10.1007/s10971-009-2074-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Choi YG, Sakai G, Shimanoe K, Miura N, Yamazoe N: Preparation of aqueous sols of tungsten oxide dihydrate from sodium tungstate by an ion exchange method. Sens. Actuators B 2002, 87: 63–72. 10.1016/S0925-4005(02)00218-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Choi YG, Sakai G, Shimanoe K, Yamazoe N: Wet process-based fabrication of WO3 thin film for NO2 detection. Sens. Actuators B 2004, 101: 107–111. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.02.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Jeon et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.