Functionalized self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous silica nanoparticles with high surface coverage
© Wei et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 22 May 2012
Accepted: 24 May 2012
Published: 21 June 2012
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) containing vinyl-, propyl-, isobutyl- and phenyl functionalized monolayers were reported. These functionalized MSNs were prepared via molecular self-assembly of organosilanes on the mesoporous supports. The relative surface coverage of the organic monolayers can reach up to 100% (about 5.06 silanes/nm2). These monolayer functionalize MSNs were analyzed by a number of techniques including transmission electron microscope, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction pattern, cross-polarized Si29 MAS NMR spectroscopy, and nitrogen sorption measurement. The main elements (i.e., the number of absorbed water, the reactivity of organosilanes, and the stereochemistry of organosilane) that greatly affected the surface coverage and the quality of the organic functionalized monolayers on MSNs were fully discussed. The results show that the proper amount of physically absorbed water, the use of high active trichlorosilanes, and the functional groups with less steric hindrance are essential to generate MSNs with high surface coverage of monolayers.
Periodic mesoporous silica materials have been intensively investigated over the last decade due to their ordered structure, large surface area, and well-defined pore size [1, 2]. Mesoporous silica materials with different morphologies, such as spheres , fibers , films , and vesicles  have been developed. Very recently, small mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have been receiving much attention [7–14]. Compared with bulk mesoporous silica (typical diameter of 500 nm to several micrometers), MSNs (diameters ranging from 50 to 500 nm) offer additional properties, such as fast mass transfer of molecules into or out of the pore systems, effective adhesion to the substrates, good suspension in solution, and easy permeability across cell membrane . These features make MSNs excellent candidates for drug delivery vehicles , sensors , and catalyst supporter . However, many applications require these materials to have special binding sites, stereochemical configuration, charge density or surface, and interface properties (such as wetting and adhesion) [18–20]. So, it is necessary to develop methods to modification of the large surface by organic functional groups to tailor the surface properties or to bind special targets, thus extending the use of MSNs to wide application [21, 22].
So far, two main pathways are available for functionalization of MSNs with organic groups. One is the grafting method based on direct reaction between organosilane and surface silanols [23, 24]. The limitation of this synthetic method is that the population of the organic groups would be limited to the original number of surface silanols on MSNs, and thus, a low surface coverage is obtained (<25%) [23–25]. Another approach for functionalization of MSNs is the one-pot synthesis method through co-condensation of tetraalkoxysilanes with terminal trialkoxyorganosilanes in the presence of structure-directing agents, leading to materials with organic residues anchored covalently to the pore walls [18, 21]. Using this method, the organic MSNs with narrow particle size distribution in the range of about 40 to 150 nm could be synthesized,21 but this method leads to disordered MSNs, and the content of organic functionalities in the modified silica phases does not normally exceed 40 mol% [18, 21].
Here, we extent the self-assembled method toward the generation of self-assembled monolayer functionalize MSNs (SAM-MSNs) and show that the surface coverage of the monolayers can be varied up to 100% within MSNs, as well as retention of ordered structure. As described in the following, various organic monolayers could be assembled onto the porous walls of MSNs using this general method.
The organosilanes (vinyl-trichlorsilan, propyl-trichlorsilan, isobutyl-trichlorosilane, and phenyl-trichlorsilan) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA. Other reagents were purchased from Shanghai Zhenxin Reagents Factory, Jiading, Shanghai. Toluene was dried over 10 Å molecular sieves for 10 days and then refluxed over Na for 10 h. Ultrapure water (σ = 18.2 MΩ cm) was degassed and decarbonated with argon.
Surface analysis of samples was performed on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 analyzer (GA, USA) at the temperature of liquid nitrogen. The surface areas were calculated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and pore size distribution was measured by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods. Samples were outgassed at 100°C for 12 h before analysis. The pore volume was taken at a relative pressure of 0.99. Cross-polarized solid state 29Si NMR experiments were recorded on Bruker DSX 300 NMR (Bruker Optik Gmbh, Ettlingen, Germany). The following experimental parameters were used: 4.0 KHz spinning frequency, 45o pulse width of 2.4 ls, 30 s recycle delay, and 360 scans. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were obtained using a Bruker Vertex70 spectrophotometer using KBr pellets. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained from JEOL 2100 operating at 200 kV (Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were prepared by evaporation of a drop of sample solution on a grid at room temperature.
For preparation of organic monolayer functionalized MSNs, MSNs were first prepared according to a reported method [32, 33]. Typically, 1 g of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was dissolved in a solution of 480 mL water and 3.5 mL of 2 M NaOH. Mesitylene (7.0 mL) was then added to the solution. The mixture was stirred vigorously at 80°C for 2 h, following which tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (5.0 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for further 2 h at 80°C. The resulting precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with methanol, and dried under a vacuum at 100°C for 24 h. The surfactant templates and mesitylene were extracted from the samples using HCl/methanol solution. A suspension of 1.0 g of the as-synthesized MSNs was stirred for 6 h at 50°C in 100 mL methanol with 0.75 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid. The template-removed product was then collected via filtration and dried under vacuum at100°C for 12 h.
The procedure for functionalization of MSNs with organic monolayers was described as follows: 1 g of MSNs (1095 m2 of surface area) was suspended in 50 mL of dried toluene. To this mixture was added 0.33 mL of water (18.22 mmol, corresponding to 1 × 1019 water molecules/m2, just equal to twice the number of silanol groups present on a fully hydroxylated silica surface).19 The suspension was stirred vigorously for 3 h at room temperature to allow the water to disperse through the mesoporous matrix. Then organic trichlorsilans (9.11 mmol, corresponding to 5 × 1018 water molecules/m2 just equal to the number of silanol groups present on a fully hydroxylated silica surface) were added via syringes, and the mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature under N2. The produces were collected by filtration, washed with plenty of 2-propanol, and dried under a vacuum.
Results and discussion
SAM-MSNs were synthesized via deposition of organic monolyers on the pore walls of MSNs. First, the surface of MSNs was prehydrated with two monolayers worth of water, followed by treatment with one monolayer worth of organosilanes (based on the available surface area). The organosilanes (vinyl-trichlorsilan, propyl-trichlorsilan, isobutyl-trichlorsilan, and phenyl-trichlorsilan) then underwent hydrolysis and became covalently attached to the substrate and cross-linked to one another, generating SAM-MSNs with different organic groups (denoted Vi-SAM-MSNs, Pr-SAM-MSNs, Is-SAM-MSNs, and Ph-SAM-MSNs, respectively).
Properties of different self-assembled monolayer functionalize mesoporous silica nanoparticles (SAM-MAN)
Weight changes after functionalization
BET surface area (m2/g)
BJH pore size (nm)
Pore volume (cm3/g)
Cross-polarized solid state 29 Si-MAS NMR spectroscopy data of SAM- MSNs
Sample chemical shift (ppm)
The surface coverage and the quality of the organic functionalized monolayers on MSNs are greatly affected by three facts: the number of absorbed water, reactivity of organosilanes, and the stereochemistry of organosilane. The organic molecules could be anchored onto the mesoporous silica surface through 'direct silanation' mechanism, but the population of the organic groups would be limited to the number of surface silanols, resulting in a low surface coverage (only 22% of full surface coverage was observed when MSNs reacted with vinyl-trichlorsilan). A proper amount of physically absorbed water is of utmost importance to build the functionalized monolyers on MSNs. This absorbed water provides a hydrated interface to hydrolyze organosilanes, which is one of the critical first steps in the deposition of the monolyers. It was found that only two monolayers worth of water (based on the available surface area) is enough to hydrolyze organosilanes and deposition of functional monolayer. However, excess of water should be avoided because the presence of free water would lead to polymerization of organosilanes in a solution.
The use of trichlorosilanes as functional molecules is necessary for the preparation of SAM-MSNs with high surface coverage. A low surface coverage was obtained (about 20%) when trialkoxyorganosilanes were used for deposition of monolayers on the MSNs surface, whereas a high surface coverage was possible when trialkoxyorganosilanes was used to functionalize the bulk mesoporous silica. The reason for this different behavior might be that the functional molecules are very easy to be transferred out of the pores of MSNs during the functionalization process. So, a functional molecule with a higher activity is essential to be hydrolyzed and deposited on the pore walls of MSNs. Trichlorosilanes show higher active toward the absorbed water than trialkoxyorganosilanes. Especially, the hydrolysis of trichlorosilanes generates HCl which can greatly enhance the condensation reaction between neighboring silanes, as well as between the hydroxylsilanes and the polar oxide surface,24 leading to closely packed monolayers on the oxide surface.
The stereochemistry of organosilane is another element that significantly affects the surface coverage of the organic functionalized monolayers on SMNs. The vinyl and phenyl-based organosilanes with a short alkane chain generated SAM-MSNs with high surface coverage (100% and 80%, respectively), whereas a relatively low surface coverage (approximately 65%) was obtained when the propyl-based organosilane with a longer alkane chain was used. Isobutyl-trichlorosilane generated the lowest surface coverage (37%). The reason might be that the side methyl groups blocked the condensation reaction between neighboring silanes, resulting in less functional molecules deposition on the MSN surface.
The SAM-MSNs were synthesized, and the relative surface coverage of the organic monolayers can reach up to 100%. It was found that an appropriate level interfacial hydration, the use of trichlorosilanes as functional molecules, and the functional groups with less steric hindrance are essential to generate MSNs with high surface coverage of monolayers. The functional monolayers provide special attributes (such as binding sites, stereochemical configuration, and special interface properties) for mesoporous silica surface. We believed that the combination of unique structure of MSNs and functionalized monolayers can extend the use of MSNs to a wide array of applications (such as adsorption, sensing, catalysis, and drug delivery) and also benefit the development of new generation of sophisticated functional nanocomposites.
LMW is currently an associated professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. His research interests include preparation of carbon-based nanomaterilas and their use for in sensors and energy storage. DWS received her B.Sc. degree in the School of Materials Science and Engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China) and is currently doing her Graduate thesis in Prof Zhang's group in Research Institute of Micro/Nano Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Her research focus includes carbon nanomaterials for application in sensors and energy storage. ZHZ received his PhD degree in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He is now an assistant professor at the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. His research focus includes nanomaterials for application in solar cells and energy storage. We are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51272155), National High-Tech R & D Program of China (863, No. 2011AA050504), and the Analytical and Testing Center of SJTU. His research focus now includes the preparation of CNT and CNT field emission display. LYL is an assistant professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Her research focus is characterization of nanomaterials. CXC is currently an associated professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. His research interests include preparation of carbon-based nanomaterilas and their use for in sensors and energy storage. YFZ is currently a professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. His research interests include synthesis of gas-sensing nanomaterials and their applications in nanodevice.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
mesoporous silica nanoparticles
self-assembled monolayer functionalize MSNs
transmission electron microscope
X-ray diffraction pattern.
We are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20504021, 50730008, 61006002, 60871032), The Fund of Defence Key Laboratory of Nano/Micro Fabrication Technology, the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 10ZR1416300), Shanghai Science and Technology Grant (No. 1052 nm05500), National High-Tech R & D Program of China (863, No.2011AA050504), SMC Excellent Young Faculty Project of 'ChenXing Scholar', the U-M/SJTU Collaborative Research Program, and the Analytical and Testing Center of SJTU.
- Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Bech JS: Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 1992, 359: 710–712. 10.1038/359710a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW: A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 1992, 114: 10834–10843. 10.1021/ja00053a020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi LM, Ma JM, Cheng HM, Zhao ZG: Micrometer-sized mesoporous silica spheres grown under static condition. Chem Mater 1998, 10: 1623–1626. 10.1021/cm970811aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huo QS, Zhao DY, Feng JL, Weston K, Buratto SK, Stuck GD, Schacht S, Schuth F: Room temperature growth of mesoporous silica fibers: a new high-surface-area optical waveguide. Adv Mater 1997, 9: 974–978. 10.1002/adma.19970091210View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao DY, Yang PD, Melosh N, Feng JL, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD: Continuous mesoporous silica films with highly ordered large pore structures. Adv Mater 1998, 10: 1380–1385. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199811)10:16<1380::AID-ADMA1380>3.0.CO;2-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YS, Shi JL, Hua ZL, Cheng HR, Ruan ML, Yan DS: Hollow spheres of mesoporous aluminosilicate with a three-dimensional pore network and extraordinarily high hydrothermal stability. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 609–612. 10.1021/nl034134xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Giri S, Lin VS-Y: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery and biosensing applications. Adv Mater 2007, 17: 1225–1236.Google Scholar
- Hong C, Lee JK, Zheng HM, Hong SS, Lee C: Porous silicon nanoparticles for cancer photothermotherapy. Nanoscale Rese Lett 2011, 6: 321. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-321View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty P, Landskron K: Simple systematic synthesis of periodic mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles with adjustable aspect ratios. Nanoscale Rese Lett 2009, 4: 1. 10.1007/s11671-008-9200-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu J, Liong M, Zink JI, Tamanoi F: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a delivery system for hydrophobic anticancer drugs. Small 2007, 3: 1341–1346. 10.1002/smll.200700005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao ZM, Xie YW, Goodisman J, Asefa T: Isomer-dependent adsorption and release of cis- and trans-platin anticancer drugs by mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 2010, 26: 8914–8924. 10.1021/la904695aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strømme M, Atluri R, Brohede U, Frenning G, Garcia-Bennett AE: Proton absorption in as-synthesized mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a structure-function relationship probing mechanism. Langmuir 2009, 25: 4306–4310. 10.1021/la900105uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Du X, He JH: Hierarchically mesoporous silica nanoparticles: extraction, amino-functionalization, and their multipurpose potentials. Langmuir 2011, 27: 2972–2979. 10.1021/la200014wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wan XJ, Wang D, Liu SY: Fluorescent pH-sensing organic/inorganic hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles with tunable redox-responsive release capability. Langmuir 2010, 26: 15574–15579. 10.1021/la102148xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu F, Wu SH, Hung Y, Mou CY: Size effect on cell uptake in well-suspended, uniform mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Small 2009, 5: 1408–1413. 10.1002/smll.200900005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi ZM, Honma I, Zhou H: Ordered-mesoporous-silica-thin-film-based chemical gas sensors with integrated optical polarimetric interferometry. Appl Phy Lett 2006, 88: 053503/1–053503/3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ren J, Ding J, Chan KY, Wang H: Dual-porosity carbon templated from monosize mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 2786–2795. 10.1021/cm0621545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann F, Cornelius M, Morell J, Fröba M: Silica-based mesoporous organic–inorganic hybrid Materials. Angew Chem Int Edt 2006, 45: 3216–3251. 10.1002/anie.200503075View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giraldo LF, López BL, Pérez L, Urrego S, Sierra L, Mesa M: Mesoporous silica applications. Macromol Symp 2007, 258: 129–141. 10.1002/masy.200751215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng X, Fryxell GE, Wang LQ, Kim AY, Liu J, Kemner KM: Functionalized monolayers on ordered mesoporous supports. Science 1997, 276: 923–926. 10.1126/science.276.5314.923View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kobler J, MÖller K, Bein T: Colloidal suspensions of functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2008, 2: 791–799. 10.1021/nn700008sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma YH, Xing L, Zheng HQ, Che SA: Anionic − cationic switchable amphoteric monodisperse mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011, 27: 517–520. 10.1021/la103979cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fryxell GE, Mattigod SV, Lin Y, Wu H, Fiskom S, Parker K, Zheng F, Yantasee W, Zemanian TS, Addleman RS, Liu J, Kemner K, Kelly S, Feng X: Design and synthesis of self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports (SAMMS): the importance of ligand posture in functional nanomaterials. J Mater Chem 2007, 17: 2863–2874. 10.1039/b702422cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lourdes BD, David NR, Mercedes CC: Design of fluorescent materials for chemical sensing. Chem Soc Rev 2007, 36: 993–1017. 10.1039/b609548hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Descalzo AB, Jimenez D, Marcos MD, Martínez-Máñez R, Soto J, Haskouri JE, Guillém C, Betrán D, Amorós P, Borrachero MV: A new approach to chemosensors for anions using MCM-41 grafted with amino groups. Adv Mater 2002, 14: 966–969.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Victor C, Richard MC, Charles MS: Reactions and reactivity in self-assembled monolayers. Adv Mater 2000, 12: 1161–1171. 10.1002/1521-4095(200008)12:16<1161::AID-ADMA1161>3.0.CO;2-CView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crooks RM: New organic materials suitable for use in chemical sensor arrays. Acc Chem Res 1998, 5: 219–227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christen K: Novel nanomaterial strips contaminants from waste streams. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38: 453A-454A. 10.1021/es040685tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Feng XD, Glen E, Fryxell GE, Wang LQ, Kim AY, Gong ML: Hybrid Mesoporous Materials with Functionalized Monolayers. Adv Mater 1998, 10: 161–165. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199801)10:2<161::AID-ADMA161>3.0.CO;2-QView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chow BY, Mosley DW, Jacobson JM: Perfecting imperfect “monolayers”: removal of siloxane multilayers by CO2 snow treatment. Langmuir 2005, 21: 4782–4785. 10.1021/la050144xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zemanian TS, Fryxell GE, Liu J, Mattigod S, Franz JA, Nie Z: Deposition of self-assembled monolayers in mesoporous silica from supercritical fluids. Langmuir 2001, 17: 8172–8177. 10.1021/la0107401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular delivery of membrane-impermeable proteins. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129: 8845–8849. 10.1021/ja0719780View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei LM, Zhang YF: Emulsion polymerization of ethylene from mesoporous silica nanoparticles with vinyl functionalized monolayers. J Polym Sci: Part A: Polym Chem 2009, 47: 1393–1402. 10.1002/pola.23247View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai CY, Trewyn BG, Jeftinija DM, Jeftinija K, Xu S, Jeftinija S, Lin VSY: A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based carrier system with chemically removable CdS nanoparticle caps for stimuli-responsive controlled release of neurotransmitters and drug molecules. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125: 4451–4459. 10.1021/ja028650lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y: Effect of surface functionalization of MCM-41-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles on the endocytosis by human cancer cells. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128: 14792–14793. 10.1021/ja0645943View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei LM, Tang T, Huang BT: Novel acidic porous clay heterostructure with highly ordered organic–inorganic hybrid structure: one-pot synthesis of mesoporous organosilica in the galleries of clay. Micropor Mesopor Mater 2004, 67: 175–179. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2003.11.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Qiao SH, Jin YG, Chen ZG, Gu HC, Lu GQ: Magnetic hollow spheres of periodic mesoporous organosilica and Fe3O4 nano crystals: fabrication and structure control. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 805–809. 10.1002/adma.200700900View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.