Open Access

Investigations of the pore formation in the lead selenide films using glacial acetic acid- and nitric acid-based electrolyte

  • Sergey P Zimin1Email author,
  • Egor S Gorlachev1, 2,
  • Viktor V Naumov2 and
  • Fedor O Skok1
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:338

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-338

Received: 25 April 2012

Accepted: 12 June 2012

Published: 22 June 2012


We report a novel synthesis of porous PbSe layers on Si substrates by anodic electrochemical treatment of PbSe/CaF2/Si(111) epitaxial structures in an electrolyte solution based on glacial acetic acid and nitric acid. Electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, and local chemical microanalysis investigation results for the porous layers are presented. Average size of the synthesized mesopores with approximately 1010 cm−2 surface density was determined to be 22 nm. The observed phenomenon of the active selenium redeposition on the mesopore walls during anodic treatment is discussed.


Porous semiconductors Lead selenide Anodic electrochemical treatment Electrolyte Mesopores 81.05.Rm; 71.20.Nr; 81.65.Cf.


Currently, there is a new rapidly emerging direction of modern nanotechnology research in the fabrication of porous semiconductor compound materials. Such nanostructured materials can be applied in many novel and unique practical applications, such as optoelectronic devices based on the quantum size effects due to the small dimensions of the interpore material, or biomedical compounds based on storing nanoinclusions in the pore volume, and many more. Of course, porous Si [1] and III-V and II-VI compound semiconductors [2, 3] to date have been studied rather extensively. On the other hand, IV-VI materials, in particular lead chalcogenides PbX (X = Te, Se, S), while being extremely useful for thermoelectric and optoelectronic applications [4, 5], are not researched at porous form almost at all. Among the reasons for that are the lack of the large monocrystalline wafer samples fitted for anodic cell treatment and also the absence of an established electrolyte etchant solution. Recently, while being able to be the first to demonstrate the pore formation in lead chalcogenide layers and study their properties [69], we also found out that a potassium hydroxide (KOH)-based electrolyte, which was originally proposed by Norr [10, 11] and is most commonly used for the PbX electropolishing, is not optimal for a stable pore formation in PbSe, in contrast to PbTe [9]. It became necessary to optimize anodic treatment conditions for the fabrication of a well-defined pore morphology in lead selenide layers, and such new and more fruitful approach is presented in this work.


Initial samples were high-quality epitaxial monocrystalline PbSe films with a thickness of 2.2 to 5.2 μm grown on CaF2/Si(111) wafer substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) in ETH, Zürich [5]. The thickness of the calcium fluoride buffer layer was 2 to 4 nm. Anodic electrochemical treatment experiments were based on a technological approach that allows us to prepare porous lead chalcogenide layers on silicon wafer substrates using a vertical-type electrochemical cell [6]. The key treatment feature was the electrolyte solution. For the discussed study, the first batch of the initial epitaxial PbSe films was anodized using a KOH-based electrolyte solution (Norr electrolyte) [10] containing 20 g of KOH, 45 ml of distilled water, 35 ml of glycerol, and 20 ml of ethanol. Current density was 2 to 8 mA·cm−2, and treatment duration was 10 to 20 min, performed at room temperature. These film samples were further divided into two groups depending on the morphology type of their initial surface: the first group had a typical flat surface for MBE-grown PbX layers on CaF2/Si(111) with nanoterraces and dislocation exit pits with approximately 107 cm−2 density, while the second group had a peculiar granular surface (for details, see [8]). The second batch of PbSe films (containing 3% Sn, with flat initial surface) was anodized using a solution of 10 ml of nitric acid (HNO3), 10 ml of glacial (undiluted) acetic acid (CH3COOH), and 40 ml of glycerol (first used by EH Tompkins and GL Johnson [11] for the electropolishing of lead selenide at high current densities), for which, by analogy with porous silicon, we reduced the current density (1 mA·cm−2) and processing temperature (20°C) with a duration of 10 min. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies were performed on Supra-40 (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany); chemical energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) local microanalysis was carried out simultaneously with SEM using an INCA-Energy spectrometer (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

Results and discussion

The first batch of porous PbSe films was fabricated using the Norr electrolyte. We discussed these results in much detail in [8], and here, we will give only the basic overview. The principal result was that the modified anodized layer morphology strongly depended on the initial film surface state. Thus, PbSe layers with island-like morphology (Figure 1a) for the films with flat initial surface were obtained. PbSe nanoislands with a lateral size of 40 to 400 nm, a height of 90 nm, and average separating gaps of 70 nm were synthesized on the surface of the underlying unmodified PbSe film. A peculiar effect was that for the longer treatment durations, when the entire PbSe film was etched away, such isolated PbSe nanoislands were positioned directly on the Si substrate. On the other hand, using PbSe films with granular initial surface, it was possible to fabricate hierarchical mesoporous surficial layers (Figure 1b). Such hierarchical porous networks typically contained large open macropores (100 to 250 nm) with smaller secondary macropores (50 to 75 nm) and mesopores (15 to 20 nm) on the macropore walls. Notably, only a modification of a thin near-surface layer with a thickness of approximately 150 to 200 nm took place during anodic treatment independently of its duration. One important conclusion from this experimental study was that, unfortunately, in both cases, the modified layer occupied only a thin surficial part of the processed PbSe film, and a formation of a well-defined pore network did not take place. It became obvious that the main problem for the results discussed above was the undesirably high etch rate of PbSe that did not allow the formation of a developed thick porous layer due to an active material removal.
Figure 1

SEM images of the modified PbSe layers obtained by anodic treatment with Norr electrolyte. ( a) Island-like morphology for the samples with initial flat film surface. ( b) Hierarchical porous film for the samples with initial granular film surface.

Therefore, it became necessary to apply a new electrolyte with low-speed electropolishing. We have proposed to introduce to anodic treatment process an electrolyte solution of nitric acid, glacial acetic acid, and glycerol (Tompkins and Johnson solution). Here, nitric acid is the etching agent and acetic acid is the wetting agent that stabilizes the material removal and modification processes. Consequently, the anodic treatment resulted in the formation of well-defined porous layers, showing the success in using glacial acetic acid to limit the dissolution rate. Typical SEM images of a surface and cross section of the PbSe porous layer with a thickness of 750 nm on top of the unmodified PbSe film are given in Figure 2. The average size of the synthesized mesopores was 22 nm, and their density on the surface was approximately 1010 cm−2. The thickness of the underlying unmodified PbSe film indicated that the thickness of the PbSe layer that was etched away was equal to the thickness of the fabricated porous layer, due to the stabilizing role of glacial acetic acid, in contrast to the Norr electrolyte treatment [8], when the thickness of a porous modified PbSe layer was typically an order of magnitude smaller than the removed layer thickness.
Figure 2

SEM images of the surface and cross section of the porous PbSe layer. The surface with normal view ( a) and with 70° tilt ( b), and the sample cross section with 70° tilt ( c).

X-ray diffractometry investigations did not show a formation of any new compounds for the anodized PbSe/CaF2/Si(111) samples in addition to the PbSe cubic structure, indicating that the double-layer PbSe structure material is still essentially a monocrystalline PbSe. EDS analysis, however, showed that the stoichiometry of PbSe for the mesoporous layers was severely modified. The EDS chemical mapping based on the Lα1−2 and Mα1 rays of the elements lead and selenium showed a high chemical heterogeneity between the porous layer and the underlying unmodified layer (Figure 3). For the initial film, the atomic ratio between Pb and Se atoms on the surface was 0.96, and for the porous layer, it became 0.07, due to the extremely high selenium enrichment. We can assume that during anodic etching, the positive lead ions dissolve into the electrolyte, while the negative selenium ions redeposit on the pore walls. As a result, the matrix remains a monocrystalline PbSe.
Figure 3

SEM image of the porous PbSe sample and EDS maps for Se and Pb. SEM image of the porous PbSe sample cross section (sample tilt is 70°) with the dark porous surficial layer and the underlying initial PbSe film ( a); EDS map for Se ( b), EDS map for Pb ( c).

The abovementioned conclusion is supported by the SEM images in back-scattered electrons (Figure 4), which exposed the fact that many of the pores on the surface are obviously closed due to the active redeposition of the products of the electrochemical reactions. More specifically, we observed darker areas around the pores, which became more profound with the increase of the electron energy, meaning that the yield of the back-scattered electrons for these areas decreases. The reason for that is the increase in the proportion of inelastic collisions of electrons with the sample surface. This is possible if the atoms are not rigidly arranged, i.e., have the ability to move under electron impact. Hence, the electrons will pass such a large amount of energy to atoms, while they themselves will lose it and will not be detected as back-scattered. Therefore, this process indicates the ‘soft,’ amorphous regions. We can conclude that for the areas around the pores during anodic etching, atomic Pb leaves the porous layer for electrolyte and the development of an amorphous friable Se layer occurs.
Figure 4

SEM image and image in back-scattered electrons of the surface of the porous PbSe layer. SEM image of the surface of the porous PbSe layer ( a) and the image in back-scattered electrons with 10-kV high voltage ( b) for the same area.

It should be noted that the deposition of chalcogen during electrochemical processings of PbX materials is a known effect, and Se layers were reported to be fabricated electrochemically [1114]. However, we are the first to observe the effect of selenium redeposition for the electrochemical synthesis of porous PbX layers. Thus, in [12], where Se thin films with PbSe nanoclusters were fabricated electrochemically in nitric acid-based solutions via anodic dissolution of PbSe, the analysis of the corresponding processes showed the reaction of PbSe dissolution to Pb2+ ions and Se atoms, which presumably takes place for the porous layers as well. The Se layer on the pore walls can potentially be very beneficial for the practical applications of the porous PbSe layers due to its modified semiconductor properties and high sensitivity in the visible range, and amorphous coatings in particular can have their own specific applications. At the same time, the redeposited Se film can serve as a protective, stabilizing layer by analogy with Te coatings. For example, in [15], PbTe has been coated with a thin sublimed porous elemental tellurium layer, in order to prevent surface oxidation and carbon absorption. Obviously, a further experimental research is required to learn the properties of Se-coated mesoporous PbSe layers fabricated in our study, but there are all reasons to believe that this nanostructured material holds much promise for the fabrication of stabilized porous layer-based devices on silicon wafer substrates.


In this work, our results demonstrated the potential of the developed novel technique for the synthesis of porous PbSe by anodic electrochemical treatment of PbSe/СaF2/Si(111) epitaxial structures in an electrolyte containing glacial acetic acid and nitric acid, with the former wetting the surface and stabilizing the growth of the porous layer. SEM studies showed the presence of mesopores with a surface density of approximately 1010 cm−2 and an average size of 22 nm, while EDS mapping showed the enrichment of the pore walls with selenium, and the latter effect can be useful for the practical applications of PbSe porous layers in various devices, as well as for the fundamental study of the electrochemical processes during the porous PbX material fabrication.

Authors’ information

SPZ is a professor at the Microelectronics Department, Yaroslavl State University. ESG is a principal engineer at the Microelectronics Department, Yaroslavl State University and a research associate at the Yaroslavl Branch of the Institute of Physics and Technology of Russian Academy of Sciences. VVN is a senior research fellow at the Yaroslavl Branch of the Institute of Physics and Technology of Russian Academy of Sciences. FOS is a student at the Microelectronics Department, Yaroslavl State University.



Acetic acid


Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy


Nitric acid


Potassium hydroxide


Molecular beam epitaxy


Lead selenide


Scanning electron microscopy.



The authors would like to thank E Yu Buchin (Yaroslavl Branch of the Institute of Physics and Technology RAS) and VM Vasin (Yaroslavl State University) for their valuable contributions to the anodic electrochemical treatment experiments, and H Zogg (ETH, Zürich) for the provided epitaxial PbSe samples. Electron microscopy and chemical microanalysis investigations were performed at the Center for Collective Use of Scientific Equipment ‘Diagnostics of Micro- and Nanostructures’ (Yaroslavl). This study was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) (grants 12-02-90029-Bel_a and 12-02-90419-Ukr_a).

Authors’ Affiliations

Microelectronics Department, Yaroslavl State University
Yaroslavl Branch of the Institute of Physics and Technology of Russian Academy of Sciences


  1. Sailor MJ: Porous Silicon in Practice. Preparation, Characterization and Applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim; 2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Föll H, Leisner M, Cojocaru A, Carstensen J: Macroporous semiconductors. Materials 2010, 3: 3006–3076. 10.3390/ma3053006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Langa S, Tiginyanu IM, Monaico E, Föll H: Porous II-VI vs. porous III-V semiconductors. Phys Stat Sol C 2011, 8: 1792–1796. 10.1002/pssc.201000102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Dmitriev AV, Zvyagin IP: Current trends in the physics of thermoelectric materials. Phys Usp 2010, 53: 789–803. 10.3367/UFNe.0180.201008b.0821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zogg H, Kellermann K, Alchalabi K, Zimin D: Optically pumped lead-chalcogenide mid-infrared emitters on silicon substrates. Infrared Phys Technol 2004, 46: 155–159. 10.1016/j.infrared.2004.03.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zimin SP, Bogoyavlenskaya EA, Buchin EY, Petrakov AP, Zogg H, Zimin D: Formation of porous nanostructured lead telluride films by an anodic electrochemical etching method. Semicond Sci Technol 2009, 24(105008):1–6.Google Scholar
  7. Zimin SP, Gorlachev ES, Naumov VV, Buchin EY, Zogg H: Fabrication of porous nanostructured lead chalcogenide semiconductors for modern thermoelectric and optoelectronic applications. J Phys Conf Ser 2011, 291(012023):1–6.Google Scholar
  8. Zimin SP, Vasin VM, Gorlachev ES, Buchin EY, Naumov VV: Investigations of PbSe layers after anodic electrochemical etching by scanning electron microscopy. Phys Stat Sol C 2011, 8: 1918–1922. 10.1002/pssc.201000026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zimin S, Vasin V, Gorlachev E, Naumov V, Petrakov A, Shilov S: Fabrication and study of porous PbTe layers on silicon substrates. Phys Stat Sol C 2011, 8: 1801–1804. 10.1002/pssc.201000025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Norr MK: An electrolytic polish and etch for lead telluride. J Electrochem Soc 1962, 109: 433–434. 10.1149/1.2425438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Norr MK: Polishes and etches for tin telluride, lead sulfide, lead selenide, and lead telluride. Naval Ordnance Laboratory Report NOLTR, ; 1963:63–156.Google Scholar
  12. Streltsov EA, Poznyak SK, Osipovich NP: Photoinduced and dark underpotential deposition of lead on selenium. J Electroanalytical Chem 2002, 518: 103–114. 10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00694-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivanov DK, Osipovich NP, Poznyak SK, Streltsov EA: Electrochemical preparation of lead-doped amorphous Se films and underpotential deposition of lead onto these films. Surf Sci 2003, 532–535: 1092–1097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Alanyalioglu M, Demir U, Shannon C: Electrochemical formation of Se atomic layers on Au(111) surfaces: the role of adsorbed selenate and selenite. J Electroanalytical Chem 2004, 561: 21–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettini M, Brandt G, Rotter S: Tellurium coating of PbTe surfaces. J Vac Sci Technol 1979, 16: 1548–1553. 10.1116/1.570245View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Zimin et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.