Nanoindentation of GaSe thin films
© Jian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 June 2012
Accepted: 17 July 2012
Published: 17 July 2012
The structural and nanomechanical properties of GaSe thin films were investigated by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nanoindentation techniques. The GaSe thin films were deposited on Si(111) substrates by pulsed laser deposition. XRD patterns reveal only the pure (000 l)-oriented reflections originating from the hexagonal GaSe phase and no trace of any impurity or additional phases. Nanoindentation results exhibit discontinuities (so-called multiple ‘pop-in’ events) in the loading segments of the load–displacement curves, and the continuous stiffness measurements indicate that the hardness and Young’s modulus of the hexagonal GaSe films are 1.8 ± 0.2 and 65.8 ± 5.6 GPa, respectively.
KeywordsGaSe thin films XRD Nanoindentation Hardness
The most unique structural feature of the family of III-VI semiconductors is the existence of layers within which the atomic bonds are mainly covalent with a certain degree of ionic component. GaSe is a layered III-VI chalcogenide semiconductor with a number of interesting properties for electrical and nonlinear optics applications, such as compound semiconductor heterostructure devices , IR detectors , and solar cells . However, while most of the previous researches have been concentrated on its electrical and optical characteristics for device applications, researches on the mechanical properties have not drawn equal attention. A quadruple layer of GaSe building block consists of two Ga and two Se sub-layers with the stacking sequence of Se-Ga-Ga-Se, where the Se-Ga and Ga-Ga bonds are covalent within the quadruple layers and the Se-Se bond between adjacent quadruple layers is due to van der Waal forces . As a result, significant differences as compared to most III-V and II-VI semiconductors are expected and accurate measurements of the mechanical properties of GaSe thin films are required, since such parameters are critical for making structural elements as well as functional devices.
Due to its high sensitivity, excellent resolution, and easy operation, nanoindentation has been widely used for characterizing the mechanical properties of various nanoscale materials [5, 6] and thin films [7–9]. Among the mechanical properties of interest, hardness, Young’s modulus, and elastic/plastic deformation behaviors can be readily obtained from nanoindentation measurements. Through the analyses on the load–displacement curves obtained during the nanoindentation, the hardness and Young’s modulus of the test material can be easily obtained following the methods proposed by Oliver and Pharr . However, in the case of thin films, the responses after certain penetration depth may arise from the film and underneath substrate, and the obtained mechanical properties may not be completely reflecting the intrinsic properties of the films. Thus, indentation with contact depths of less than 10 % of the films’ thickness is needed to obtain intrinsic film properties and avoid the influence of the substrate . In addition, it is very difficult to obtain meaningful analytical results for indentation depths less than 10 nm because of the equipment limitations. Hence, it is not possible to obtain substrate-independent results for films thinner than 100 nm. In order to get an insight on the influence of the substrate and obtain the intrinsic properties for films less than 100 nm thick, it is essential to monitor the mechanical properties as a function of depth. In this work, we used a dynamic approach, referred as continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) mode , to continuously monitor the hardness and Young’s modulus values as a function of the indentation depth. Herein, in this study, Berkovich nanoindentation-induced multiple pop-in behaviors were observed and the mechanical properties of the hexagonal GaSe thin films were obtained by analyzing the nanoindentation load–displacement curves.
GaSe thin films were deposited on the 0.3-mm-thick Si(111) substrates at 475 °C by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The target used was a GaSe single crystal grown by vertical Bridgman method. The thickness of GaSe films was about 200 nm. The structural features of the obtained GaSe films were inspected by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker D8 Advance TXS with Cu-Kα radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å, Madison, WI, USA). The mechanical properties (hardness and Young’s modulus) of GaSe thin films were investigated using an MTS Nano Indenter® XP instrument with a three-sided pyramidal Berkovich indenter tip (Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Prior to applying loads to the GaSe films, indentations were conducted on the standard sample (fused silica with a Young’s modulus of 68 to 72 GPa) to obtain the reasonable loading range. The CSMs  were carried out by superimposing small-amplitude, 75-Hz oscillations on the force signal to record stiffness data along with load and displacement data dynamically. Firstly, the indenter was loaded and unloaded three times to ensure that the tip was properly in contact with the surface of the materials and that any parasitic phenomenon is released from the measurements. Then, the indenter was loaded for a fourth and final time at a strain rate of 0.05/s, with a 60-s holding period inserted at peak load in order to avoid the influence of creep on unloading characteristics, which were used to compute the mechanical properties of the specimen. In addition, for the sake of obtaining steady mechanical characteristics and preventing interference from environmental fluctuation factor, each test was performed when the thermal drift dropped down to 0.01 nm/s. The analytic method developed by Oliver and Pharr  was used to determine the hardness (H) and Young’s modulus (E) of the GaSe thin film from the load–displacement curves.
Results and discussion
With the CSM measurements, the penetration depth-dependent hardness and Young’s modulus of the hexagonal GaSe thin film were calculated directly from the load–displacement data following the analytic method developed by Oliver and Pharr . The results are displayed in Figure 3b,c, respectively. In Figure 3b, the penetration depth-dependent hardness of GaSe thin films can be roughly divided into two stages, namely the initial increase to a maximum value and an asymptotic decrease toward a nearly constant value after the penetration depth reaches 50 nm. The increase in hardness at small penetration depth is usually attributed to the transition between purely elastic to elastic/plastic contact whereby the hardness is really reflecting the mean contact pressure and is not representing the intrinsic hardness of GaSe. Only under a condition of a fully developed plastic zone does the mean contact pressure represent the hardness. When there is no plastic zone, or a partially formed plastic zone, the mean contact pressure (which is measured using the Oliver and Pharr method) is less than the nominal hardness. After the first stage, the hardness gradually decreases with the increasing penetration depth and eventually reaches a more or less constant value of 1.8 ± 0.2 GPa, which is in good agreement with that of the single crystal GaSe (2.0 ± 0.4 GPa) . It is also noted that within the penetration depth of 50 nm, the hardness appears to be quite ‘noisy’ as a function of the penetration depth, presumably due to the extensive dislocation activities being activated in this stress range.
Figure 3c shows the plot of Young’s modulus as a function of penetration depth for the GaSe thin film derived using the method of Oliver and Pharr . Unlike that displayed in Figure 3b for the hardness, the Young's modulus appears to be relatively insensitive to the penetration depth of the Berkovich indenter after the first 20 nm, within which the changes have been attributed to the transition between purely elastic to elastic/plastic contact. Moreover, the obtained Young's modulus for the GaSe films is 65.8 ± 5.6 GPa, which is much larger than the value of 33 ± 3 GPa reported for GaSe single crystals . Mechanical properties of materials are size-dependent due to the influences of surface stress effect [17, 18]. However, it is not clear at present why the Young's modulus exhibits such a substantial difference between the thin films and single crystal of GaSe, while the hardness of both remains almost the same.
Now turning back to Figure 1a, the cyclic load–displacement curves obtained with the Berkovich indenter for the hexagonal GaSe thin film clearly displays multiple pop-ins in the indentation loading curves. Although at relatively lower applied loadings (<2 mN) the behaviors are similar to that displayed in Figure 3a, at higher applied loadings, especially the last segment, it may have arisen from a very different deformation mechanism. In particular, due to the large indentation depth, the pop-out event observed in the last segment of the unloading curve might be related to the indentation-induced phase transition occurring in the underneath Si substrate . Moreover, as revealed by the SEM photograph shown in Figure 1b, there are cracks (see the red arrow in the inset of Figure 1b) and pile-ups along the corners and edges of the residual indented pyramid, respectively. Thus, the cause of the ‘later’ multiple pop-ins may have been complicated by the involvement of the Berkovich indentation-induced cracking on the surface of the hexagonal GaSe thin films.
A closer look at the loading curves displayed in Figures 1a and 3a reveals that the multiple pop-ins do not exactly coincide at the same indenter penetration depths. Since each curve is associated with a specific stress rate depending on the maximum indentation load, it suggests that the first pop-in event is not thermally activated. Instead, these phenomena have been ubiquitously observed in a wide variety of materials and are usually attributed to dislocation nucleation or/and propagation during loading [20–22] or micro-cracking . Moreover, in order to check the validness of attributing the abovementioned pop-out event exhibited in the unloading curve to the indentation-induced phase transition occurring in underneath Si substrates, we have repeated the tests many times. It was confirmed that the pop-out event occurs whenever the penetration depth exceeds 200 nm, the thickness of the present GaSe thin films. The cubic phase Si is known to exhibit pressure-induced phase transformation during nanoindentation. During the course of loading, the cubic Si will transform into metallic Si phase (Si-II) when a certain pressure is reached. While unloading, pressure release will lead to further transformation into amorphous Si or a mixture of bcc Si and rhombohedral Si phases depending on the unloading rate [19, 24]. On the other hand, the pressure-induced structural phase transition in GaSe has been investigated by diamond anvil cell experiments previously . The magnitude of pressure required to induce phase transitions is significantly higher than the apparent room-temperature hardness of the GaSe thin film measured in this study. Furthermore, the multiple pop-ins have been reported previously in hexagonal-structured sapphire , GaN thin films , and GaN/AlN multilayers , and evidences have indicated that the primary nanoindentation-induced deformation mechanism in these hexagonal-structured materials is nucleation and propagation of dislocations or crack formations. It is thus quite plausible to state that similar mechanisms must have been prevailing in the present GaSe thin films.
Here, the values of nm and nm can be obtained.
XRD analysis showed that GaSe thin films grown on Si(111) substrates are purely (000 l)-oriented hexagonal phase.
Nanoindentation results indicate that the values of hardness and Young's modulus of the hexagonal GaSe thin films are 1.8 ± 0.2 and 65.8 ± 5.6 GPa, respectively. Although the hardness value is in good agreement with those obtained from bulk single crystals (2.0 ± 0.4 GPa), the value of Young's modulus of the present films is more than twice larger than that of the bulk single crystals (33 ± 3 GPa). The reason for the apparent discrepancy is not clear at present.
Similar to many hexagonal-structured semiconductor materials, the primary deformation mechanism for GaSe is governed by nucleation and propagation of dislocations or crack formations. Based on the scenario, the nanoindentation-induced generation of dislocation loops associated with the first pop-in event was estimated to be in the order of approximately with a critical radius ( nm). The obtained dislocation density is relatively low and is consistent with the scenario of homogeneous dislocation nucleation-induced first pop-in event.
SRJ is an associate professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 84001, Taiwan. SAK is a Ph.D. student, CWL is an associate professor, and JYJ is a professor in the Department of Electrophysics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.
This work was partially supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, under grant nos. NSC101-2221-E-214-017, NSC100-2221-E-214-024, and NSC101-2221-E-214-017. JYJ is partially supported by the NSC of Taiwan and the MOE-ATU program operated at NCTU. The authors like to thank Dr. Y-S Lai and Dr. P-F Yang (Central Product Solutions, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., Taiwan) for their technical supports.
- Giulio MD, Micocci G, Sililiano P, Tepore A: Photoelectronic and optical properties of amorphous gallium-selenide thin films. J Appl Phys 1987, 62: 4231. 10.1063/1.339095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kyazym-zade AG, Agaeva AA, Salmanov VM, Mokhtari AG: Optical detectors on GaSe and InSe layered crystals. Tech Phys 2007, 52: 1611. 10.1134/S1063784207120146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dejene FB: The structural and material properties of CuInSe2 and Cu(In, Ga)Se-2 prepared by selenization of stacks of metal and compound precursors by Se vapor for solar cell applications. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2009, 93: 577. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pellicer-Porres J, Segura A, Ferrer C, Munoz V, Miguel AS, Polian A, Itie JP, Gauthier M, Pascarelli S: High-pressure x-ray-absorption study of GaSe. Phys Rev B 2002, 65: 174103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zou L, Jin H, Lu WY, Li XD: Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of the cell wall of bamboo fibers. Mater Sci Eng C 2009, 29: 1375. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Xu ZH, Webb RA, Li XD: Electrical self-healing of mechanically damaged zinc oxide nanobelts. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 241. 10.1021/nl103637kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Chen GJ, Lin TC: Berkovich nanoindentation on AlN thin films. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 935. 10.1007/s11671-010-9582-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Ke WC, Juang JY: Mechanical characteristics of Mg-doped GaN thin films by nanoindentation. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2012, 4: 598.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Chen HG, Chen GJ, Jang JSC, Juang JY: Structural and nanomechanical properties of a-plane ZnO thin films deposited under different oxygen partial pressure. Curr Appl Phys 2012, 12: 849. 10.1016/j.cap.2011.11.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliver WC, Pharr GM: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992, 7: 1564. 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsui TY, Pharr GM: Substrate effects on nanoindentation mechanical property measurement of soft films on hard substrates. J Mater Res 1999, 14: 292. 10.1557/JMR.1999.0042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li XD, Bhushan B: A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact 2002, 48: 11. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdullah MM, Bhagavannarayana G, Wahab MA: Growth and characterization of GaSe single crystal. J Cryst Growth 2010, 312: 1534. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.01.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li XD, Gao HS, Murphy CJ, Gou LF: Nanoindentation of Cu2O nanocubes. Nano Letters 1903, 2004: 4.Google Scholar
- Mosca DH, Mattoso N, Lepienski CM, Veiga W, Mazzaro I, Etgens VH, Eddrief M: Mechanical properties of layered InSe and GaSe single crystals. J Appl Phys 2002, 91: 140. 10.1063/1.1423391View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Juang JY: Indentation-induced mechanical deformation behaviors of AlN thin films deposited on c-plane sapphire. J Nanomater 2012, 2012: 914184.Google Scholar
- Wang GF, Li XD: Size dependency of the elastic modulus of ZnO nanowires: surface stress effect. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 231912. 10.1063/1.2821118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tao XY, Wang XN, Li XD: Nanomechanical characterization of one-step combustion-synthesized Al4B2O9 and Al18B4O33 nanowires. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 3172. 10.1021/nl071772xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Chen GJ, Juang JY: Nanoindentation-induced phase transformation in (110)-oriented Si single crystals. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2010, 14: 69. 10.1016/j.cossms.2009.11.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradby JE, Kucheyev SO, Williams JS, Jagadish C, Swain MV, Munroe P, Phillips MR: Contact-induced defect propagation in ZnO. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 80: 4537. 10.1063/1.1486264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Juang JY, Lai YS: Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy observations of structural damage in Al0.16 Ga0.84N thin film under contact loading. J Appl Phys 2008, 103: 033503. 10.1063/1.2836939View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jian SR, Juang JY, Chen NC, Jang JSC, Huang JC, Lai YS: Nanoindentation-induced structural deformation in GaN/AlN multilayers. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 2010, 2: 315. 10.1166/nnl.2010.1100View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bull SJ: Nano-indentation of coatings. J Phys D Appl Phys 2005, 38: R393. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/24/R01View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jang J, Lance MJ, Wen S, Tsui TY, Pharr GM: Indentation-induced phase transformation in silicon: influences of load, rate and indenter angle on the transformation behavior. Acta Mater 2005, 53: 1759. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz U, Olguin D, Cantarero A, Hanfland M, Syassen K: Effect of pressure on the structural properties and electronic band structure of GaSe. Phys Stat Sol B 2007, 244: 244. 10.1002/pssb.200672551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nowak R, Sekino T, Maruno S, Niihara K: Deformation of sapphire induced by a spherical indentation on the (1010) plane. Appl Phys Lett 1996, 68: 1063. 10.1063/1.115713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chien CH, Jian SR, Wang CT, Juang JY, Huang JC, Lai YS: Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy observations on the Berkovich indentation-induced deformation microstructures in GaN thin films. J Phys D Appl Phys 2007, 40: 3985. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/13/011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson KL: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1985.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirth JP, Lothe J: Theory of Dislocations. Wiley, New York; 1981.Google Scholar
- Lorenz D, Zeckzer A, Hilpert U, Grau P, Johnson H, Leipner HS: Pop-in effects as homogeneous nucleation of dislocations during nanoindentation. Phys Rev B 2003, 67: 172101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.