Open Access

Flower-like Na2O nanotip synthesis via femtosecond laser ablation of glass

  • Champika Samarasekera1,
  • Bo Tan1Email author and
  • Krishnan Venkatakrishnan2
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:404

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-404

Received: 8 May 2012

Accepted: 3 July 2012

Published: 18 July 2012


The current state-of-the-art in nanotip synthesis relies on techniques that utilize elaborate precursor chemicals, catalysts, or vacuum conditions, and any combination thereof. To realize their ultimate potential, synthesized nanotips require simpler fabrication techniques that allow for control over their final nano-morphology. We present a unique, dry, catalyst-free, and ambient condition method for creating densely clustered, flower-like, sodium oxide (Na2O) nanotips with controllable tip widths. Femtosecond laser ablation of a soda-lime glass substrate at a megahertz repetition rate, with nitrogen flow, was employed to generate nanotips with base and head widths as small as 100 and 20 nm respectively, and lengths as long as 10 μm. Control of the nanotip widths was demonstrated via laser dwell time with longer dwell times producing denser clusters of thinner nanotips. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis reveals that nanotip composition is Na2O. A new formation mechanism is proposed, involving an electrostatic effect between ionized nitrogen and polar Na2O. The synthesized nanotips may potentially be used in antibacterial and hydrogen storage applications.


Femtosecond laser ablation Nanostructure Formation mechanism Nonmetallic glasses (silicates) Na2O 81 Materials science; 81.07.-b nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization; 81.16.-c methods of micro- and nanofabrication and processing


Nanotips are a subset of nanostructured materials harboring size-dependent properties that make them uniquely suited to a wide variety of applications in biosensing [1, 2], high efficiency solar cells [3, 4], and light emission/detection [5, 6]. Similarly, soda-lime silicate glasses are among the most ubiquitous of commercial glasses found in windows, containers, bioactive implants [7], and as low cost substrates for thin-film photovoltaics [8]. Previous studies have shown that increasing the Na2O content (a major component of soda-lime silicates) of glass can induce a cytotoxic response in cells [9], and randomly oriented nanoscale rod-like structures have demonstrated cell death through reduced cell adhesion [10]. Thus, nanostructured soda-lime silicates may open up new avenues of relevance in antibacterial applications. Additionally, it has been shown that up to 3.0 wt.% hydrogen can be reversibly absorbed by Na2O [11]. Improving the performance of such hydrogen storage materials may lay in the enhanced reactivity through increased surface area that the nanostructuring can provide.

Sodium (Na) is frequently used in the process of synthesizing nanostructures and usually constitutes part of a compound nanomaterial in the form of nanowires [12, 13] and nanocubes [14]. Nanostructured Na2O can be purchased in the form of spherical nanopowders; however, there is no report on the synthesis of Na2O nanotips or nanowires. This may be indicative of a reluctance to work with sodium oxide due to its reactivity with aqueous media. However, this need not be a limiting factor. In antibacterial applications where the shape of the nanostructure is believed to cause reduced adhesion of cells, the nano-morphology must be preserved. In the case of Na2O, the preservation of its nanostructure and resistivity to aqueous media can be accomplished by depositing a thin film of material (i.e., sputter coating) over the nanostructured surface. The hydrogen storage work of Xu et. al. required no interaction with aqueous media, and the experimenters worked around Na2O reactivity by storing samples in a dry box under argon.

Flower-like arrangements of nanoscale structures have previously been synthesized from other metals or metal oxides, such as ZnO [1518], CuO [19], Cd(OH)2[20], Ni(OH)2[21], Fe3O4[22], TiO2[2325], titanate [26], Pt [27, 28], Ni [29], and SiOx[30]. The bulk of the aforementioned nanostructures were formed using wet techniques such as sol-gel [23, 24], hydrothermal [15, 16, 22, 25, 26], solvothermal [29], chemical bath [19, 21], galvanic displacement [28], electrodeposition [27], or liquid phase pulsed laser ablation (LP-PLA) [20] synthesis. Besides the high cost of raw materials, most wet techniques also require long processing times and/or the use of hazardous organic solutions, which is likely to result in chemically contaminated products. Even the relatively simple LP-PLA method requires careful choices in liquid media and surfactant. A few researchers have used dry-deposition systems such as radio-frequency plasma-assisted magnetrons [17], pulsed laser deposition [18], or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [30]. These techniques operate under vacuum conditions that can cause added complications in production scale up, and CVD requires the use of catalysts.

In this article we report the synthesis of Na2O nanotip clusters using femtosecond laser irradiation of soda-lime glass. Laser irradiation focused inside soda-lime silicates has been suggested to cause the precipitation of Na nanoparticles [31]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first instance describing the synthesis of flower-like Na2O nanotip clusters. The ultrafast laser technique used in this work results in immediate nanotip processing and requires no surfactant, catalyst, nor pressure chamber. The definitive goal for fabricators is the ability to control growth, geometry, and size of the nanostructures. To achieve such bridling, an understanding of a nanostructure's formation mechanism is required. This paper reports on the morphologies of nanotip structures created on soda-lime glass via femtosecond laser ablation, control of nanotip thickness by changing the amount of time over which the laser delivered pulses to the sample, the importance of Na2O in nanotip synthesis, and also proposes formation mechanisms based on the observations of nanotip composition and structure using scanning/transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).


The experimental setup, as illustrated in Figure 1, consists of a 1,030-nm wavelength direct-diode pumped Yb-doped fiber-amplified ultrafast laser source, a beam delivery system, computer controlled galvoscanner, and 3-axis micrometer-resolution translation stage. The laser is capable of delivering pulses with 200 fs duration and pulse repetition rates in the range of 200 kHz to 26 MHz, all at a maximum average power of 15 W. Experiments were performed at repetition rates of 8.4, 12, and 25 MHz and dwell times (time spent delivering laser pulses to a single point on the sample) of 2, 5, and 10 ms. The galvoscanner enabled the samples to be irradiated with a predetermined laser scan pattern, in this case, an array of points with a center-to-center distance of 50 μm. The spot size of the beam at the sample is calculated to be 10.38 μm. All samples were processed under ambient conditions with nitrogen gas flowing at a rate of 10 SCFH over the ablation site. The direction of gas flow was perpendicular to the propagating direction of the incident laser beam.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of experimental setup. A, ultrafast laser source; B, acousto-optic modulator; C1 and C2, mirrors; D1 and D2, beam expander; E1 and E2, diaphragms; F, galvoscanner; G, telecentric lens; H, nitrogen nozzle; I, sample; and J, 3-axis stage.

Glass samples were cut from standard 75 × 25 mm Corning soda-lime glass microscope slides (Ted Pella Inc, Redding, CA) (72% SiO2, 15% Na2O, 5% CaO, 4% MgO, 2% Al2O3, 1% K2O, and 1% all other constituents). The laser processed samples were first sputter-coated with gold and then examined under SEM. The copper substrate grids were dragged across the surface of ablated samples to collect nanostructures and subsequently observed under TEM. For chemical characterization of the nanostructures, EDX was employed.


Morphology of nanotips

All nanotips were randomly oriented and displayed a characteristic-tapered morphology, broad at the base with a distribution of widths from 100 nm to 2 μm and narrowing to a head as small as 20 nm over a length of 1 to 10 μm. Increasing the dwell time at a repetition rate of 8.4 MHz resulted in a greater number of thinner, but not longer, needle-like tips (see Figure 2). The base width of tips at 2 and 5 ms dwell times were typically 1 to 2 μm with more tips per flower generated at 5 ms. When dwell time was increased to 10 ms, base widths shrank between 100 to 500 nm. Interspersed among and around the nanotips were nano and microscale spheres. In some cases, aggregated nanoparticles were also observed.
Figure 2

SEM images of flower-like nanotips formed at a repetition rate of 8.4 MHz and dwell times of (a) 2 ms, (b) 5 ms, and (c) 10 ms. Inset shows high magnification image of a typical single 10 ms dwell time nanotip with a head width of 20 nm.

Also, at this repetition rate nanotip flowers often formed in clusters of 50 μm or larger; however, dramatic differences in nanotip population density (nanotips per unit area) were seen oftentimes within a single ablated region of a sample (see Figure 3).
Figure 3

SEM image of many clusters of flower-like nanotips. Inset shows higher magnification of a typical cluster.

When the repetition rate was increased to 12 MHz (see Figure 4), single nanotips were observed at 2 ms dwell time and at 5 ms dwell time; the formation of flower-like nanotips was more prevalent along with microsphere formation and melt splatter. At 10 ms dwell time, there was further evidence of microsphere formation and melt splatter alongside the continued flower-like nanotip formation. However, at all dwell times clusters of flower-like nanotips as observed at the lower laser repetition rate were not present.
Figure 4

SEM images of single nanotips formed at a repetition rate of 12 MHz and dwell times (a) 2 ms and flower-like nanotips at dwell times of (b) 5 ms and (c) 10 ms.

At repetition rates of 25 MHz, the nanotip formation was typically nonexistent at 2 ms dwell time and sporadic at 5 and 10 ms (see Figure 5).
Figure 5

SEM images of glass substrates after ablation at a repetition rate of 25 MHz and dwell times (a) 2 ms, showing no nanotip formation; (b) 5 ms; and (c) 10 ms showing rare occurrences of flower-like nanotips.

Composition of nanotips

Analysis of the flower-like nanotips revealed that the composition of the structures were different from that of the surrounding substrate. Presented in Figure 6 are EDX area scans of a cluster of flower-like nanotips (the region bounded in red on the SEM image and white on the EDX area scans) surrounded by aggregated nanoparticles (the area outside the boundary). This nanotip region shows high concentrations of oxygen and sodium and a clear absence of silicon.
Figure 6

SEM image of (a) cluster of flower-like nanotips and surrounding nanoparticle agglomerates with corresponding EDX area scans showing high concentrations of (b) oxygen; (c) sodium; and an absence of (d) silicon within the bounded nanotip region.

The destructive nature of mounting samples on the substrate grid for use on the TEM resulted in the collection of nanotip fragments. Inspection of individual fragments using line scan EDX revealed that they consisted primarily of oxygen and sodium. Sharp silicon (Si) peaks correspond to the aggregates of Si nanoparticles (see Figure 7). The line scans were purposely drawn well beyond the boundaries of the nanotip so as to compare the element levels of the nanotip to that of the TEM grid. Since the levels of silicon are completely in the noise range except at the two indicated points of interest, we can deduce that silicon is certainly not present throughout the tip.
Figure 7

TEM images (a) collected nanotip fragment and line scan EDX along i) length, which shows ii) width of fragment. EDX results along the length and width show (b,e) oxygen, (c,f) sodium throughout the fragment, and (d,g) silicon only at the agglomerated particles.

Collected along with large amounts of nanotip fragments were the microspheres. EDX area scans (see Figure 8) show that the spherical structures differed considerably in composition from their surrounding tips. The spherical particles were primarily constituted of silicon, calcium, aluminum, and magnesium. This was starkly evident in an EDX area scan which showed a dearth of sodium and oxygen in the microsphere.
Figure 8

TEM images (a) nanotip fragments and microspheres with corresponding EDX area scans showing the composition of microspheres to be primarily (b) silicon, (c) calcium, (d) aluminum, and (e) magnesium; while nanotips are composed of (f) sodium and (g) oxygen.


Laser interactions

The presence of several types of structures (single/clustered nanotips, microspheres, and nanoscale aggregates) would appear to indicate multiple formation mechanisms. Much is understood about the material breakdown processes during laser ablation [32]. The optical breakdown of materials is achieved through avalanche ionization of electrons that transfer energy to the lattice of a target material. The energy from a femtosecond laser pulse is deposited into a target faster than the electron-phonon scattering time. Under laser irradiation a solid target will undergo several phenomena simultaneously: direct vaporization of the solid forming a rapidly expanding plasma [33], direct fragmentation of the bulk solid into nanoparticles [34], and material melt forming a thin (few microns thick) molten pool that will explosively boil at high laser intensity and eject microspheres [35]. We shall consider every type of observed structure and see how their formation mechanisms complement each other and fit within the context of laser ablation. Figure 9 illustrates the proposed formation mechanisms together with the experimental evidence. All SEM images were of samples collected at 8 MHz repetition rate, 15 W average power, 10 SCFH nitrogen flow rate, and varying dwell times of 2 and 10 ms.

The optical breakdown of transparent materials occurs when laser pulses of sufficient intensity strike the target substrate's surface (see Figure 9, i) and transfer energy to the electrons via nonlinear ionization, starting the avalanche ionization process. The intensity, I, of a laser pulse can be calculated from the well-known equation,
I = 4 P f τ p d 0 2 π
where P is the laser power, f is the repetition rate, τp is the pulse duration and d0 is the laser spot diameter. Given the values of the laser parameters used in this experiment, the calculated intensity at the sample surface for repetition rates of 8.4, 12, and 25 MHz are 1.1 × 1013, 7.0 × 1012, and 3.5 × 1012 W·cm−2 respectively. The first and second values are well within the threshold intensity for nitrogen ionization (approximately 3.5 × 1012 W·cm−2) [36]; however, the calculated intensity at a repetition rate of 25 MHz is at the cusp of the ionization threshold. The values calculated here are for an ideal system and of course, further reductions in intensity should be expected from optical losses.
Figure 9

The proposed formation mechanisms (i) Laser pulses induce optical breakdown; (ii) agglomeration of Si nanoparticles occurs in the plume and a melt layer forms; (iii) melt layer separates soda-lime glass molecules by density; (iv) spallation creates microscale Na 2 O melt spheres; (v) polar Na 2 O molecules are electrostatically drawn out towards the laser-ionized nitrogen; (vi) the drawn Na 2 O cools into flower-like nanotip arrangements (dwell time = 2 ms), (vii) at longer dwell times more nitrogen is ionized, (viii) resulting in thinner nanotips (dwell time = 10 ms); (ix) melt that is now low in Na 2 O is expelled via plume backcoil pressure to form melt spheres composed of the higher density molecules; (x) typical crater and characteristic lip indicative of a backcoil pressure event (dwell time = 2 ms).

At 8.4 MHz the calculated laser intensity at the focus would ionize nitrogen at a rate of 107 s−1[36] but falls as a function of height above the focal plane due to the increased laser spot diameter. Since the beam is Gaussian, its diameter, d, will vary along the distance, z (also the direction of propagation), according to [37],
d z = d 0 1 + λ z π d 0 2 2 2 1 / 2

where d0 is the laser spot diameter at the focal plane and λ is the wavelength. At a distance of 10 μm above the focal plane, the beam intensity drops by approximately 10% resulting in a tenfold decrease in the rate of nitrogen ionization. At a distance of 130 μm above the sample surface, the beam diameter expands to 20 μm, and the beam intensity is too low to ionize nitrogen. As shall be explained later, this layer of ionized nitrogen may play a critical role in the formation of nanotips.

Proposed formation mechanism

The Si formations on nanotip fragments observed under TEM are evidently the result of aggregating nanoparticles and are usually attributed to nucleation and condensation of the vaporized material [34]. In this process, beams of sufficiently high laser fluence heat the region of a target material and vaporize atoms and molecules creating plasma. This plasma will expand as a plume due to continued heating by the laser. The vapor plume begins to cool as it propagates outward interacting with the ambient environment and as a result, the vaporized atoms condense and particles begin to aerosolize (see Figure 9, ii). The particles may then continue to collide with each other forming larger nanoscale aggregates [33].

The microscale spherical particles generated in this study are indicative of formation from a liquid state. Furthermore, the compositional differences between the microspheres and the nanotips in our experimental results point to a phase separation taking place. It is highly likely then, that the molecules separate by density (see Table 1).
Table 1

Soda-lime glass composition by weight and corresponding molecular densities at 25°C


Density (g·cm−3)






2.2 – 2.6











Depending on their size, these spherical particles can be attributed to spallation and backcoil pressure (1 to 10 μm) [34, 35]. In the first scenario, after a melt layer is created (see Figure 9 iii), the tensile stresses induced by the laser create defects (cavities) along the solid-melt interface; these defects combine causing the ejection of droplets. Backcoil pressure is the result of a quickly expanding vapor plume, pushing liquid melt out from the irradiated spot. If the momentum of the melt is higher than the surface tension, droplets will be ejected around a formed rim as shown in Figure 9, ix.

Sodium oxide is the least dense compound in soda-lime glass. Therefore, regardless of the melt ejection process, we can expect sodium oxide to be at the melt surface (see Figure 9, iv). Furthermore, Na2O is a polar molecule. The previously described layer of ionized nitrogen may cause an electrostatic effect that attracts the polar liquid phase Na2O (see Figure 9, v). As this liquid is drawn out towards the nitrogen ions, it cools and solidifies into nanotips. The drawing process is evidenced by the tapered structure of the nanotips (see Figure 9, vi). In this experiment the nitrogen gas was provided from one nozzle and in only one direction. As laser dwell time increases, the population of nitrogen ions would grow (see Figure 9, vii). This increase in ions would offer more sources of electrostatic attraction for the polar Na2O. Thus, a greater number of tips would be drawn from a droplet of the same volume; the formed cluster would have a higher density of tips, but they would be thinner in width. However, this increased ion density does not affect the length of the nanotips (see Figure 9, viii).

The formation of nanotips into clusters larger than the beam diameter (see Figure 3) suggests that the ionization of nitrogen has an expanded area of effect, which can be accounted for by the constant flow of nitrogen disturbing the population of ions and moving them away from the ablation zone. The fewer observed flower-like nanotips at 12 MHz repetition rates are congruent with a lower quantity of ionized nitrogen due to the lower laser pulse intensity. The observed scarcity of nanotips at a 25 MHz repetition rate can be explained from little to no nitrogen ionizing due to the laser pulse intensity dropping below the ionization threshold of nitrogen.

We have previously shown [38] that without nitrogen flow, similar ablation conditions will not result in nanotip but rather nanofiber formation. Given that the threshold intensity for ionization of air is lower than that of nitrogen [36, 39], this may seem surprising. However, the high pressure plume formed during vaporization creates a shockwave that pushes the ambient gas away, creating a vacuum [40, 41]. Thus, the ablation zone would be devoid of ionized air. The introduction of nitrogen flow during the ablation process forces a mixing of nitrogen gas into the plume. The nitrogen flow also results in rapid cooling, which would aid in halting the vaporization process and initiating melt ejection processes.

Although silicon dioxide (SiO2) is similar in density to Na2O, the SiO2 molecules are nonpolar and, therefore, unaffected by the electrostatic effect, hence the lack of silicon in the nanotip structure. However, this explanation would not hold true for highly ionic calcium oxide molecules (CaO). The higher density of CaO must impede its ability to be drawn into nanotip structures. The melt that has not solidified into nanotips is likely low in Na2O; a delayed melt expulsion process (such as backcoil pressure) would then explain the formation of spherical particles rich in SiO2 and higher density molecules (see Figure 9, ix). The crater and rim structures are typically evidence of a backcoil pressure event with microspheres and nanotip clusters around the rim (see Figure 9, x).


We demonstrate a novel method for synthesis of flower-like nanotips on soda-lime glass via femtosecond laser ablation. Nanotips with head widths as small as 20 nm were obtained. The composition of these nanotips has been investigated and shown to be primarily sodium oxide. From the morphology and composition of the nanotips and their surrounding nano and micro structures, a formation mechanism has been proposed. The process begins with a melting of the glass substrate and separation by density of molecules. This is quickly followed by melt ejection of polar Na2O particles that interact electrostatically with the ionized nitrogen, creating the characteristic nanotip shape. Further work is being conducted to determine the cytotoxic potential of these Na2O nanotip structures for applications in the controlled localized growth of cells (i.e., patterned growth) and their use as antibacterial surfaces. The determination of the hydrogen absorptivity of these Na2O nanotips is also planned for possible energy storage opportunities.



This research is funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. CS appreciates Mugunthan Sivayoganathan at Ryerson University for his helpful discussions on particle generation mechanisms.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ryerson University
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University


  1. Zheng XT, Li CM: Single living cell detection of telomerase over-expression for cancer detection by an optical fiber nanobiosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 2010, 25(6):1548–1552. 10.1016/j.bios.2009.11.008View Article
  2. Lo H-C, Hsiung H-I, Chattopadhyay S, Han H-C, Chen C-F, Leu JP, Chen K-H, Chen L-C: Label free sub-picomole level DNA detection with Ag nanoparticle decorated Au nanotip arrays as surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy platform. Biosens Bioelectron 2011, 26(5):2413–2418. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.10.022View Article
  3. Yang Z, Xu T, Ito Y, Welp U, Kwok WK: Enhanced electron transport in dye-sensitized solar cells using short ZnO nanotips on a rough metal anode. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113(47):20521–20526. 10.1021/jp908678xView Article
  4. Liu C-H, Chen C-H, Chen S-Y, Yen Y-T, Kuo W-C, Liao Y-K, Juang J-Y, Kuo H-C, Lai C-H, Chen L-J, Chueh Y-L: Large scale single-crystal Cu(In, Ga)Se2 nanotip arrays for high efficiency solar cell. Nano Lett 2011, 11(10):4443–4448. 10.1021/nl202673kView Article
  5. Hsieh Y-P, Chen H-Y, Lin M-Z, Shiu S-C, Hofmann M, Chern M-Y, Jia X, Yang Y-J, Chang H-J, Huang H-M, Tseng S-C, Chen L-C, Chen K-H, Lin C-F, Liang C-T, Chen Y-F: Electroluminescence from ZnO/Si-nanotips light-emitting diodes. Nano Lett 2009, 9(5):1839–1843. 10.1021/nl803804aView Article
  6. Chang SJ, Hsiao CH, Wang SB, Cheng YC, Li TC, Chang SP, Huang BR, Huang SC: A quaternary ZnCdSeTe nanotip photodetector. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4(12):1540–1546. 10.1007/s11671-009-9432-5View Article
  7. Day D: Using glass in the body. Am Ceram Soc Bull 1995, 74(12):64–68.
  8. Bosio A, Menossi D, Mazzamuto S, Romeo N: Manufacturing of CdTe thin film photovoltaic modules. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519(21):7522–7525. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.137View Article
  9. Wallace KE, Hill RG, Pembroke JT, Brown CJ, Hatton PV: Influence of sodium oxide content on bioactive glass properties. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1999, 10(12):697–701. 10.1023/A:1008910718446
  10. Lee J, Chu BH, Chen K-H, Ren F, Lele TP: Randomly oriented upright SiO2 coated nanorods for reduced adhesion of mammalian cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30(27):4488–4493. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.028View Article
  11. Xu Q, Wang R, Kiyobayashi T, Kuriyama N, Kobayashi T: Reaction of hydrogen with sodium oxide: a reversible hydrogenation/dehydrogenation system. J Power Sources 2006, 155(2):167–171. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.019View Article
  12. Wang H, Wang W, Ren Y, Huang K, Liu S: A new cathode material Na2V6O16.xH2O nanowire for lithium ion battery. J Power Sources 2012, 199: 263–269.View Article
  13. Yu A, Qian J, Liu L, Pan H, Zhou X: Surface sprouting growth of Na2Nb2O6. H2O nanowires and fabrication of NaNbO3 nanostructures with controlled morphologies. Appl Surf Sci 2012, 258(8):3490–3496. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.133View Article
  14. Zhang C, Chen J: Facile EG/ionic liquid interfacial synthesis of uniform RE3+ doped NaYF4 nanocubes. Chem Commun 2010, 46(4):592–594. 10.1039/b919044aView Article
  15. Yang B, Kumar A, Zheng H, Feng P, Katiyar RS, Wang Z: Growth of ZnO nanostructures on metallic and semiconducting substrates by pulsed laser deposition technique. J Phys D 2009, 42(4):045415. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/4/045415View Article
  16. Ostrikov K, Kumar S, Cheng QJ, Rider AE, Yajadda MMA, Han ZJ, Seo DH, van der Laan TA, Yick S, Tam E, Levchenko I: Different nanostructures from different plasmas: nanoflowers and nanotrees on silicon. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 2011, 39(11):2796–2797.View Article
  17. Zhao H, Su X, Xiao F, Wang J, Jian J: Synthesis and gas sensor properties of flower-like 3D ZnO microstructures. Mater Sci Eng B 2011, 176(7):611–615. 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.01.019View Article
  18. Cao Y, Hu X, Wang D, Sun Y, Sun P, Zheng J, Ma J, Lu G: Flower-like hierarchical zinc oxide architectures: synthesis and gas sensing properties. Mater Lett 2012, 69: 45–47.View Article
  19. Zaman S, Asif MH, Zainelabdin A, Amin G, Nur O, Willander M: CuO nanoflowers as an electrochemical pH sensor and the effect of pH on the growth. J Electroanal Chem 2011, 662(2):421–425. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.015View Article
  20. Singh SC, Gopal R: Nano architectural evolution from laser-produced colloidal solution: growth of various complex cadmium hydroxide architectures from simple particles. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114(20):9277–9289. 10.1021/jp1018907View Article
  21. Cheng Z, Xu J, Zhong H, Li D, Zhu P: A facile and novel synthetic route to Ni(OH)2 nanoflowers. Superlattices Microstruct 2010, 48(2):154–161. 10.1016/j.spmi.2010.05.013View Article
  22. Ramesh R, Rajalakshmi M, Muthamizhchelvan C, Ponnusamy S: Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoflowers by one pot surfactant assisted hydrothermal method and its properties. Mater Lett 2012, 70(1):73–75.View Article
  23. Zhao B, Chen F, Huang Q, Zhang J: Brookite TiO2 nanoflowers. Chem Commun 2009, 34: 5115–5117.View Article
  24. Cong W, Xu L: Research on performance of TiO2 nano flower structure DSSC. In ICECE 2011. 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering: 16–18 September 2011. Yichang. IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Piscataway; 2011:318–321.View Article
  25. Haouemi K, Touati F, Gharbi N: Characterization of a new TiO2 nanoflower prepared by the sol-gel process in a reverse microemulsion. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2011, 21(4):929–936. 10.1007/s10904-011-9587-2View Article
  26. Huang J, Cao Y, Liu Z, Deng Z, Tang F, Wang W: Efficient removal of heavy metal ions from water system by titanate nanoflowers. Chem Eng J 2012, 180: 75–80.View Article
  27. Kawasaki H, Yao T, Suganuma T, Okumura K, Iwaki Y, Yonezawa T, Kikuchi T, Arakawa R: Platinum nanoflowers on scratched silicon by galvanic displacement for an effective SALDI substrate. Chem Eur J 2010, 16(35):10832–10843. 10.1002/chem.201001038View Article
  28. Jia W, Su L, Lei Y: Pt nanoflower/polyaniline composite nanofibers based urea biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 2011, 30(1):158–164. 10.1016/j.bios.2011.09.006View Article
  29. Zhang G, Zhao X, Zhao L: Preparation of single-crystalline nickel nanoflowers and their potential application in sewage treatment. Mater Lett 2012, 66(1):267–269. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.052View Article
  30. Zhou CW, Cai KF, Yin JL: Synthesis and characterization of silicon oxide nanoflowers. Curr Nanosci 2011, 7(4):598–602. 10.2174/157341311796196763View Article
  31. Jiang N, Su D, Qiu J, Spence JCH: On the formation of Na nanoparticles in femtosecond-laser irradiated glasses. J Appl Phys 2010, 107(6):064301. 10.1063/1.3346858View Article
  32. Gattass RR, Mazur E: Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nat Photonics 2008, 2: 219–225. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.47View Article
  33. Lushnikov AA: Laser induced aerosols. J Aerosol Sci 1996, 27(Suppl. 1):S377-S378.View Article
  34. Webb RL, Dickinson JT, Exarhos GJ: Characterization of particulates accompanying laser ablation of NaNO3. Appl Spectrosc 1997, 51(5):707–717. 10.1366/0003702971940855View Article
  35. Yoo JH, Jeong SH, Greif R, Russo RE: Explosive change in crater properties during high power nanosecond laser ablation of silicon. J Appl Phys 2000, 88(3):1638–1649. 10.1063/1.373865View Article
  36. Couairon A, Mysyrowicz A: Femtosecond filamentation in air. In Progress in Ultrafast Intense Laser Science Volume I. Edited by: Yamanouchi K, Chin SL, Agostini P, Ferrante G. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2006:235–258.View Article
  37. Pedrotti FL: Pedrotti LS: Introduction to Optics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey; 1993.
  38. Sivakumar M, Venkatakrishnan K, Tan B: Synthesis of glass nanofibers using femtosecond laser radiation under ambient condition. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4(11):1263–1266. 10.1007/s11671-009-9390-yView Article
  39. Sun J, Longtin JP: Inert gas beam delivery for ultrafast laser micromachining at ambient pressure. J Appl Phys 2001, 89(12):8219–8224. 10.1063/1.1372157View Article
  40. Harilal SS, Bindhu CV, Tillack MS, Najmabadi F, Gaeris AC: Internal structure and expansion dynamics of laser ablation plumes into ambient gases. J Appl Phys 2003, 93(5):2380–2388. 10.1063/1.1544070View Article
  41. Sasaki K, Watarai H: Reaction between laser ablation plume and ambient gas studied by laser-induced fluorescence imaging spectroscopy. J Phys: Conf Ser 2007, 59(1):60.


© Samarasekera et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.