Microwave characterisation of carbon nanotube powders
© Porch et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 22 March 2012
Accepted: 3 July 2012
Published: 1 August 2012
We have used a 3-GHz microwave host cavity to study the remarkable electronic properties of metallic, single-walled carbon nanotubes. Powder samples are placed in its magnetic field antinode, which induces microwave currents without the need for electrical contacts. Samples are shown to screen effectively the microwave magnetic field, implying an extremely low value of sheet resistance (< 10 μΩ) within the graphene sheets making up the curved nanotube walls. Associated microwave losses are large due to the large surface area, and also point to a similar, very small value of sheet resistance due to the inherent ballistic electron transport.
Keywords73.63.Fg 72.80.Rj 78.70.Gq Carbon nanotubes Microwave Screening
There has been intensive research on the characterisation and application of carbon nanotubes for next-generation electronic devices . Ballistic conduction along single-walled metallic nanotubes is predicted theoretically and has been experimentally verified. Clearly, this has enormous impact for electronic devices fabricated using these remarkable materials, but there are problems in characterising the electronic properties using conventional (i.e. DC) techniques. This is mainly due to the need to make electrical contacts with the ends of the nanotube, which suppresses the measured conductivity, and is further complicated by inter-tube contacts. For example, it has been found that thin film samples have sheet resistances limited by the large junction resistances between adjacent nanotubes .
In this context, we propose a new method to characterise the electronic properties of metallic nanotubes using microwaves as a means of exciting currents, thus negating the requirement for electrical contacts. The method is fast and is performed on a powder sample, so it allows rapid measurements of large numbers of samples and permits in situ changes in electronic properties (e.g. due to surface adsorption of chemical species) without the need to remove the sample from the apparatus. Previous microwave studies of carbon nanotube materials have ranged from the screening efficiency of thin films  to the microwave excitation of single nanotubes . In our experiments, powder samples are placed in a region of high microwave magnetic field in a microwave cavity (here, a 3-GHz copper hairpin), and the sample properties are determined using the cavity perturbation technique. We have used a similar method to measure the electronic properties of a range of other material systems (e.g. metal-loaded zeolites ).
The hairpin itself is a 1-mm thick copper strip, with a width of 5 mm, bent into a U shape of length 23 mm and plate separation of 5 mm. The expected resonant frequency of the fundamental mode of the hairpin is, therefore, f0 ≈ c/4 L ≈ 3.26 GHz, in practise about 10% lower due to the end effects of electric and magnetic fields spilling outside of the structure. The microwave magnetic field is largest at the short-circuit end of the hairpin, where the field is also approximately uniform and runs parallel to the plate surfaces. The sample is inserted into this region. The hairpin is surrounded by a cylindrical radiation shield, of length twice that of the hairpin (i.e. 50 mm) and inner radius of 15 mm. This reduces the radiation losses from the hairpin and, thus, preserves a high quality factor, which is desirable for measuring the additional microwave loss contributed by the sample. Microwave power is coupled in and out of the hairpin using an identical pair of loop-terminated RG405 microwave coaxial cables which couple to the microwave magnetic field at the hairpin’s short-circuit end. The transmitted microwave power (i.e. |S21|2) is measured in the frequency domain using an Agilent E5071B network analyser with computer control (Agilent Technologies, Inc., CA, USA). The unloaded quality factor Q of the empty cavity is around 1,500, i.e. large for its small volume (≈ 600 mm3), thus enhancing the sample filling factor for more sensitive measurements of its electronic properties. Cavity couplings are kept weak (i.e. insertion loss > 30 dB at resonance), so that only minor correction factors are needed to extract unloaded Q factors from the raw data.
Results and discussion
A separate calibration experiment involved the insertion of small copper spheres of radii 330 μm into the same H-field position as for the sample. The observed frequency increase of Δf0 = 1.30 ± 0.01 MHz per sphere allows us to determine experimentally Veff = 270 ± 2 mm3, comparing well with the expected value of LWd/2 ≈ 290 mm3. Thus, the observed nanotube frequency shift corresponds to an effective screened volume of ≈ 1.7 mm3.
The inner tube volume within the cavity is ≈ 6.6 mm3, of which ≈ 0.40 mm3 is nanotube material (i.e. a packing fraction of about 6% by volume, based on the sample mass of 1.3 mg). From this, we conclude that the magnetic field is effectively screened within this low density powder, both from within the nanotubes themselves and from a much larger volume (×3) in the space outside. For this to happen, we also conclude that the nanotube sheet resistance must be extremely small, i.e. an upper limit of Rsq ≈ 10 μΩ based on a mean nanotube radius of a ≈ 0.7 nm. Since a trace of metallic Fe is present in the sample, it is prudent to quantify how much this contributes to the microwave screening. The 0.8% atomic ratio of Fe atoms corresponds to a volume of about 0.006 mm3. This is likely to be dispersed as very small particles of radii less than 1 μm. Given that the skin depth of Fe at 3 GHz at room temperature is about 2.8 μm, we would not expect such small particles to screen the microwave magnetic field. Even if the Fe formed a single large particle, which gives rise to the greatest screened volume, the contribution to increase in resonant frequency will be only 0.6% of that observed for the whole CNT sample. Hence, we conclude that the screening effect of the Fe is negligible.
Does such a small value of Rsq contradict the observation of the large microwave losses of Figure 4? The answer can be found in the huge surface area of carbon nanotube powders, e.g. our 1.3-mg sample has a total surface area S ≈ 1.1 m3. Sheet resistance can be extracted from Equation 1b in the limit of strong screening ωτ > > 1, resulting in Rsq ≈ 2πμ0Veff ΔfB / S ≈ 30 μΩ. Therefore, these two independent measurements (one of microwave screening, the other of microwave loss) both point to very small values of sheet resistance due to ballistic transport. In experimental studies of carbon nanotube films, the sheet resistance is found to be of the order of 1 kΩ  with similar results for graphene films . In these studies, the intrinsic sheet resistance of the carbon nanotubes can be difficult to extract from the measurements as charge transport is limited by contacts between the nanotubes. Other types of measurement such as the optical conductivities reported in  do not circumvent this problem as they characterise relatively large areas of the films. In theoretical studies of devices based on discrete carbon nanotubes and of carbon nanotube films, charge transport is often assumed to be ballistic, and therefore, the sheet resistance is zero. Ballistic transport has been observed in ohmically contacted metallic single wall carbon nanotubes having lengths less than approximately 300 nm .
Not all of the nanotube powders studied to date show such striking behaviour, so future experiments will concentrate on systematic studies of a wider range of materials (semiconducting and metallic), over a wider range of frequencies (particularly from kilohertz to megahertz), also trying to identify the nature of the defects giving rise to the finite sheet resistance. Indeed, isolating metallic samples is, itself, an important problem, and the method we have proposed here may serve as a means of quantifying the volume fraction of metallic nanotubes within a given powder.
- Anantram MP, Léonard F: Physics of carbon nanotube electronic devices. Rep Prog Phys 2006, 69: 507. 10.1088/0034-4885/69/3/R01View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuhrer MS, Nygård J, Shih L, Forero M, Yoon Y-G, Mazzoni MSC, Choi HJ, Ihm J, Louie SG, Zett A, McEuen PL: Crossed nanotube junctions. Science 2000, 494: 288.Google Scholar
- Xu H, Anlage SM, Hu L, Gruner G: Microwave shielding of transparent and conducting single-walled carbon nanotube films. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 183119. 10.1063/1.2734897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu Z, Burke PJ: Microwave transport in metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 2005, 5: 1403. 10.1021/nl050738kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson PA, Armstrong AR, Barker PD, Edmondson MJ, Edwards PP, Porch A: Rubidium doped zeolite rho: structure and microwave conductivity of a metallic zeolite. Dalton Trans 2004, 19: 3122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klein O, Donovan S, Dressel M, Grüner G: Microwave cavity perturbation technique. Int J Infrared Millimeter Waves 1993, 14: 2423. 10.1007/BF02086216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin DH, Shim HC, Song J-W, Kimb S, Hana C-S: Conductivity of films made from single-walled carbon nanotubes in terms of bundle diameter. Scr Mater 2009, 60: 607. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De S, Coleman JN: Are there fundamental limitations on the sheet resistance and transmittance of thin graphene films? ACS Nano 2010, 4(5):2713. 10.1021/nn100343fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Javey A, Guo J, Paulsson M, Wiang Q, Mann D, Lundstrom M, Dai H: High-field quasiballistic transport in short carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 2004, 92(1):106804.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.