Fabrication of porous silicon by metal-assisted etching using highly ordered gold nanoparticle arrays
© Scheeler et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 30 April 2012
Accepted: 26 July 2012
Published: 9 August 2012
A simple method for the fabrication of porous silicon (Si) by metal-assisted etching was developed using gold nanoparticles as catalytic sites. The etching masks were prepared by spin-coating of colloidal gold nanoparticles onto Si. An appropriate functionalization of the gold nanoparticle surface prior to the deposition step enabled the formation of quasi-hexagonally ordered arrays by self-assembly which were translated into an array of pores by subsequent etching in HF solution containing H2O2. The quality of the pattern transfer depended on the chosen preparation conditions for the gold nanoparticle etching mask. The influence of the Si surface properties was investigated by using either hydrophilic or hydrophobic Si substrates resulting from piranha solution or HF treatment, respectively. The polymer-coated gold nanoparticles had to be thermally treated in order to provide a direct contact at the metal/Si interface which is required for the following metal-assisted etching. Plasma treatment as well as flame annealing was successfully applied. The best results were obtained for Si substrates which were flame annealed in order to remove the polymer matrix - independent of the substrate surface properties prior to spin-coating (hydrophilic or hydrophobic). The presented method opens up new resources for the fabrication of porous silicon by metal-assisted etching. Here, a vast variety of metal nanoparticles accessible by well-established wet-chemical synthesis can be employed for the fabrication of the etching masks.
KeywordsPorous silicon Nanolithography Gold nanoparticles Self-assembly Metal-assisted etching 81.05.Rm 81.16.Nd 81.65.Cf
Porous silicon has been extensively studied in the last 30 years due to its high potential for a variety of applications such as in optoelectronic devices , sensors , and solar cells [3, 4]. Based on the first discovery of porous silicon formation by Uhlir at Bell Laboratories, the most popular method for porosification of silicon is anodic electrochemical dissolution in fluoride-containing solutions . Extensive work has been conducted in order to understand the etching mechanism and to provide experimental parameters for the formation of porous silicon with controlled pore size, density, morphology, and depth . In addition electroless etching of silicon, referred to as stain etching in an aqueous solution of HNO3 and HF, has been used for the fabrication of porous silicon . However, the chemical reactions involved are extremely complex and, consequently, hard to control resulting frequently in thin as well as inhomogeneous porous silicon layers. Quite recently, Kolasinski and co-workers made considerable progress in chemical etching of silicon by replacing HNO3 with other oxidants such as Ce4+, Fe3+, and VO2+. These stain etching formulations provided homogenous porous silicon films . A major limitation of stain etching is the range of accessible pore sizes. Here, pore diameters of up to only a few nanometers can be achieved, which is a narrow window compared to the nanometer to micrometer range accessible with anodic electrochemical etching. This drawback of chemical etching was compensated for by the discovery of metal-assisted etching which utilizes noble metal deposits on Si in order to increase its dissolution rate upon etching in a mixture of HF and an oxidative agent . The chosen noble metal, as well as the morphology of the metal deposit, has a strong influence on the generated porous silicon. Consequently, a considerable amount of studies have been published demonstrating the advantages of this method [10, 11]. It is not only simple and low-cost, but also allows for controlling the properties of the resulting nanostructure including cross-sectional shape, diameter, depth, and orientation of the pores. From this perspective it is surprising that metal deposition was almost exclusively achieved by techniques such as sputtering, electroless deposition, and thermal evaporation, leading to the formation of metal nanostructures with undefined shape, broad size distribution, and undefined interparticle spacing . Only recently, lithographically fabricated metal structures were employed for metal-assisted etching [13, 14]. The vast variety of metal nanoparticles with defined shapes and small size distribution provided by colloidal chemistry routes  was almost completely neglected. One reason might be the challenges in depositing a monolayer of metal nanoparticles on a surface with sufficient interparticle distances. Here, a method for the formation of a highly ordered gold nanoparticle array on Si is presented which can be translated into an array of ordered pores by metal-assisted etching. For this purpose gold nanoparticles were wet-chemically synthesized, furnished with polystyrene ligands, and spin-coated onto p-type Si. The self-assembled gold nanoparticle arrays were thermally treated in order to remove the polystyrene shell and subsequently etched in a solution composed of HF and H2O2.
All reagents were used as received. Silicon wafer ((1 0 0), p-type, boron-doped, resistivity of 0.01 to 0.02 Ω cm) were purchased from Siegert Consulting e.K. (Siegert Wafer GmbH, Aachen, Germany). HAuCl4·3 × H2O, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), and sodium citrate were supplied by Sigma Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany). Ethanol and H2SO4 were received from Carl Roth. H2O2 and toluene were obtained from Merck (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The l(+)-ascorbic acid and methanol were received from J. T. Baker (Mallinckrodt Baker B.V., Deventer, Netherland). Oleylamine was supplied by Acros (Acros Organics, Belgium, USA). HF was purchased from Merck. Thiol-terminated polystyrene (PS50:P4434-SSH, Mn = 50,000 gmol/1, Mn/Mw = 1.06) was obtained from Polymer Source Inc. (Quebec, Canada). Water was deionized to a resistance of at least 18.2 MΩ (Ultra pure water system (TKA Thermo Electron LED GmbH, Stockland, Niederelbert, Germany)) and then filtered through a 0.2-μm filter. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken with a Zeiss Ultra 55 ‘Gemini’ SEM (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
Gold nanoparticle synthesis
Gold nanoparticles were synthesized using a seeded growth approach. First, gold nanoparticle seeds were prepared according to Frens . Briefly, 39.4 mg (0.1 mmol) of gold(III)chloride trihydrate was dissolved in 100 mL deionized water. The solution was heated to boil, and 114 mg (0.4 mmol) of sodium citrate dihydrate dissolved in 10 mL deionized water was injected to the boiling solution under vigorous stirring. After 30 min reaction time, the resulting gold nanoparticle solution was cooled to room temperature. The solution was filtered using a 0.8-μm syringe filter prior to the subsequent growth reaction which was carried out according to Maus et al. Briefly 2,383 g (34 mmol) of hydroxylamine hydrochloride was dissolved in 3,550 mL deionized water to which 74 mL of the seed particle dispersion was added under stirring. Subsequently, 1,176 g (3 mmol) of gold(III) chloride trihydrate dissolved in 4,430 mL deionized water was slowly added to the solution with a constant flow of 420 mL/h. The solution was stirred for 8 h and after addition of 20 g of CTAB, was stirred for additional 3 h. Finally, the gold nanoparticle dispersion was centrifuged (15,000 × g, 15 min). The supernatant was discarded and the centrifugate was dispersed in deionized water. This procedure was repeated several times in order to remove the free CTAB. In addition the gold nanoparticle size distribution was narrowed by size-selective precipitation.
Functionalization of the gold nanoparticles with polystyrene
The gold nanoparticles were covered with polystyrene using a method which has been recently developed in our group. Here, the gold nanoparticles centrifugate was dispersed in 20 mL oleylamine. After ultrasonication for 15 min, the dispersion was heated to 270°C for 1 h under stirring in an inert atmosphere. The thermal treatment removed the CTAB from the particle surface. After cooling to room temperature, the dispersion was centrifuged (15 min, 5,200 × g). The supernatant was discarded, and the particles were dispersed in a mixture of 5 mL oleylamine and 20 mL toluene. In order to cover the gold nanoparticles with polystyrene ligands, the oleylamine functionalized gold particles in toluene were precipitated by adding methanol. The particles were isolated by centrifugation, and 5 mL of polymer solution composed of thiol-terminated polystyrene and toluene (5 mg/1 mL) was added to the centrifugate. After ultrasonication for 15 min, the dispersion was incubated for 2 days. This process was repeated twice and resulted in polystyrene-functionalized gold nanoparticles dispersed in toluene. The overall yield of the preparation of polystyrene-covered gold nanoparticles with a diameter of 55 ± 9 nm is 17% in relation to the amount of used gold salt. Uniform particle monolayers on Si substrates were obtained after appropriate adjustment of the particle concentration.
Si substrates (p-type, boron doped, (100) orientation, resistivity of 0.01 to 0.02 Ω cm, size of 20 × 7 mm) were immersed in either piranha solution (concentration of H2SO4:H2O2, 3:1, v/v) for 1 h or in 4.8 M HF solution for at least 10 min prior to spin-coating. The substrates were afterwards rinsed with deionized H2O as well as with ethanol, in the case of HF treatment, and were blown dry with N2. Ten microliters of polystyrene-functionalized gold nanoparticles dispersed in toluene were spin-coated onto the substrates at 2,000 rpm for 1 min (spin coater, Laurell Technologies Corporation North Wales, PA, USA; Model WS-400B-6NPP/LITE).
Polymer matrix removal
Polystyrene was removed from the gold nanoparticle surface by plasma treatment using a PVA TePla 1000 Plasma system (PVA TePla AG, Munich-Feldkirchen, Germany) (W10 (90% argon + 10% hydrogen), 150 W, 0.4 mbar, 45 min) or flame annealing. The latter was performed by pulling the substrate several times through a propane/butane flame.
The substrates decorated with bare gold nanoparticles were etched in 4.8 M HF + 0.4 M H2O2 for different time periods. Afterwards, the substrates were thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and then dried under a stream of nitrogen.
Results and discussion
Key parameters of gold nanoparticle arrays prepared on silicon using different fabrication strategies
Interparticle distance (nm)
52 ± 9
111 ± 13
Piranha treatment + plasma treatment
55 ± 8
110 ± 12
Piranha treatment + flame annealing
56 ± 10
111 ± 18
56 ± 11
HF treatment + plasma treatment
HF treatment + flame annealing
54 ± 9
105 ± 15
To summarize the porous silicon was prepared by metal-assisted etching of p-type silicon using highly ordered gold nanoparticle arrays as etching masks. Gold nanoparticles were wet-chemically synthesized and subsequently covered with polystyrene in order to enable the formation of highly ordered nanoparticle arrays on Si by self-assembly. The polymer shell of the gold nanoparticles was removed by either plasma treatment or flame annealing prior to metal-assisted etching. For the latter the gold nanoparticle-decorated Si substrates were immersed in a solution containing HF and H2O2. Depending on the fabrication process of the etching mask, the quasi-hexagonally, highly ordered array of nanoparticles was translated into a less-ordered array of pores. The best pattern transfer was achieved by using gold nanoparticle arrays whose polymer matrix was removed by flame annealing. The developed fabrication strategy can be extended to other wet-chemically synthesized metal nanoparticles and to the full potential of colloidal chemistry in order to study the influence of the size, shape, and material of the metal catalytic sites on the resulting porous silicon.
The authors thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, project PhoNa, contract number 03IS2101E) and the Max Planck Society for the financial support.
- Torres-Costa V, Martin-Palma RJ: Application of nanostructured porous silicon in the field of optics. A review. J Mater Sci 2010, 45: 2823–2838.Google Scholar
- Jane A, Dronov R, Hodges A, Voelcker NH: Porous silicon biosensors on the advance. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27: 230–239. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.12.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lipinski M, Bastide S, Panek P, Levy-Clement C: Porous silicon antireflection coating by electrochemical and chemical etching for silicon solar cell manufacturing. Physica Status Solidi A 2003, 197: 512–517. 10.1002/pssa.200306555View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bastide S, Quang NL, Monna R, Lévy-Clément C: Chemical etching of Si by Ag nanocatalysts in HF-H2O2: application to multicrystalline Si solar cell texturisation. Phys Status Solidi C 2009, 6: 1536–1540. 10.1002/pssc.200881016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uhlir A: Electrolytic shaping of germanium and silicon. Bell System Tech J 1956, 35: 333–347.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korotcenkov G, Cho BK: Silicon porosification: state of the art. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 2010, 35: 153–260. 10.1080/10408436.2010.495446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fathauer RW, George T, Ksendzov A, Vasquez RP: Visible luminescence from silicon-wafers subjected to stain etches. Appl Phys Lett 1992, 60: 995–997. 10.1063/1.106485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kolasinski KW, Gogola JW: Rational design of etchants for electroless porous silicon formation. ECS Transactions 2011, 33: 23–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kolasinski KW: Silicon nanostructures from electroless electrochemical etching. Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 2005, 9: 73–83. 10.1016/j.cossms.2006.03.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chartier C, Bastide S, Levy-Clement C: Metal-assisted chemical etching of silicon in HF-H2O2. Electrochim Acta 2008, 53: 5509–5516. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Bohn PW: Metal-assisted chemical etching in HF/H(2)O(2) produces porous silicon. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 77: 2572–2574. 10.1063/1.1319191View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang Z, Geyer N, Werner P, de Boor J, Goesele U: Metal-assisted chemical etching of silicon: a review. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 285–308. 10.1002/adma.201001784View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bechelany M, Berodier E, Maeder X, Schmitt S, Michler J, Philippe L: New silicon architectures by gold-assisted chemical etching. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2011, 3: 3866–3873. 10.1021/am200948pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grzelczak M, Perez-Juste J, Mulvaney P, Liz-Marzan LM: Shape control in gold nanoparticle synthesis. Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37: 1783–1791. 10.1039/b711490gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bauer S, Brunner JG, Jha H, Yasukawa Y, Asoh H, Ono S, Boehm H, Spatz JP, Schmuki P: Ordered nanopore boring in silicon: metal-assisted etching using a self-aligned block copolymer Au nanoparticle template and gravity accelerated etching. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 565–569. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.02.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maus L, Dick O, Bading H, Spatz JP, Fiammengo R: Conjugation of peptides to the passivation shell of gold nanoparticles for targeting of cell-surface receptors. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 6617–6628. 10.1021/nn101867wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frens G: Controlled nucleation for regulation of particle-size in monodisperse gold suspensions. Nature-Physical Science 1973, 241: 20–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health. NIH Image. ImageJ. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.