Photonic bandgap of inverse opals prepared from core-shell spheres

  • Bo-Tau Liu1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Ya-Li Lin1 and

      Affiliated with

      • Shao-Xian Huang1

        Affiliated with

        Nanoscale Research Letters20127:457

        DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-457

        Received: 14 May 2012

        Accepted: 29 June 2012

        Published: 15 August 2012


        In this study, we synthesized monodispersed polystyrene (PS)-silica core-shell spheres with various shell thicknesses for the fabrication of photonic crystals. The shell thickness of the spheres was controlled by various additions of tetraethyl orthosilicate during the shell growth process. The shrinkage ratio of the inverse opal photonic crystals prepared from the core-shell spheres was significantly reduced from 14.7% to within 3%. We suspected that the improvement resulted from the confinement of silica shell to the contraction of PS space during calcination. Due to the shell effect, the inverse opals prepared from the core-shell spheres have higher filling fraction and larger wavelength of stop band maximum.


        Core-shell Shrinkage Photonic crystal Inverse opal Polystyrene


        Based on the periodic dielectric structure, artificial photonic crystals exhibit a photonic bandgap caused by Bragg diffraction[1, 2]. The special optical properties have been widely explored for various applications including optical waveguides, sensors, light filters, optical integrated circuits, and low-threshold telecommunication lasers[37]. Especially, an inverse opal structure is more desirous due to the occurrence of a complete photonic bandgap, in which incident wavelengths are forbidden for every state of polarization and propagation direction[8, 9]. The face-centered cubic (FCC) array spheres are usually used as the templates for the preparation of inverse opals: filling the high-refractive-index materials into the voids among the spheres, and then removing the spheres by calcinating or washing with organic solvents[10, 11]. The calcination method, often used in the reported studies, is more effective in removing the organic polymeric spheres than washing with organic solvents. Nevertheless, a 10% to 20% shrinkage is inevitable[12, 13]. The drawback leads to difficultly fabricate the inverse opals with the wavelength of stop band maximum (λm) and the corresponding photonic bandgap as designed.

        The photonic bandgap of photonic crystals depends mainly on lattice constant (or diameter of spheres), refractive indices of components (spheres and voids), and filling fraction. The filling fraction of spheres for the self-assembled photonic crystals, featuring a close-packed FCC structure, is 0.74, which is impossible to change for the self-assembly approach. In most cases of inverse opals, only few materials such as silica and titania can be used to fill up the voids among air spheres due to the issues of material properties and preparation processes[14, 15]. Hence, the selectivity of refractive indices of components of inverse opals is limited. As a result, the photonic bandgap is usually not controlled by the refractive indices. A simple way to control the photonic bandgap is to change the size of spheres. However, λm is difficultly predicted due to the shrinkage caused by calcination as aforementioned.

        Core-shell or hollow colloidal photonic crystals have revealed special optical properties and chemical sensing as reported elsewhere[7, 1618]. In this study, we built upon a core-shell colloidal technique to fabricate inverse opals. The position of λm can be predicted due to the low shrinkage ratio and controlled by the variation of shell thickness.



        Styrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was purified by distillation under reduced pressure and then stored in a refrigerator. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP K30, Sigma-Aldrich), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AIBA, Sigma-Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Sigma-Aldrich), ammonium hydroxide solution (33%, Sigma-Aldrich), hydrochloric acid (36%, Katayama Chemical, Osaka, Japan), and ethanol (99.8%, Panreac, Castellar del Vallès, Spain) were used as received. Deionized water (DI water, >18 MΩ·cm) was used in all experiments.

        Synthesis and core-shell PS-silica spheres

        Polystyrene (PS) spheres were synthesized by emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization according to the modification of the previous reports[16, 19]. Briefly, 5 g of styrene and 50 g of DI water were mixed in a reaction vessel. After purging with nitrogen for at least 30 min, the vessel was placed in an oil bath at 70°C under nitrogen atmosphere. Then, 0.75 g of PVP K30 was added into the vessel as a stabilizer, and 0.13 g of AIBA was added to the mixture to initiate the polymerization reaction. The reaction was carried out for 24 h at a stirring rate of 750 rpm.

        The as-prepared PS spheres were washed with DI water by centrifugation to remove the residual initiator and unreacted monomers. To prepare the PS-silica core-shell spheres, 0.55 g of the PS spheres and 4 g of ammonia were mixed with 74 g of ethanol at 55°C. TEOS was then added dropwise into the solution. Next, the mixture was stirred at a rate of 350 rpm over 8 h for the sol–gel reaction[20, 21].

        Preparation of photonic crystals

        Glass substrates were immersed in piranha solution (H2SO4/H2O2, 7:3, v/v) for 30 min and then washed with DI water. The washed glass was put horizontally into a beaker containing 0.5 wt.% PS-silica core-shell sphere solution, which was placed in a water bath at 45°C. Opal photonic crystals were gradually formed while the water in the solution evaporated. The inverse opal photonic crystals were prepared by filling the void spaces among the sphere array with a silica sol–gel precursor. Briefly, the as-prepared opal photonic crystal sample was vertically dipped in a vessel containing the mixture of TEOS, ethanol, and 0.2 M HCl. The sample was raised from the vessel, and then dried at 100°C for 40 min. The dipping process was repeated to increase infiltration. Finally, the sample was heated to 350°C, held for 2 h, re-heated to 500°C, and then held for 8 h.


        The morphologies of the PS-silica core-shell spheres were observed from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7401F, JEOL, Akishima-shi, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (JEM-2010, JEOL). The optical properties of the photonic crystals were measured using an ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometer (Lambda 850, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

        Results and discussion

        Figure1 shows the SEM images of the as-prepared PS particles and the PS-silica core-shell particles with various shell thicknesses. Regardless of monotonic or core-shell structures, the particles reveal a nearly spherical shape and monodispersed distribution. As shown in Figure1 and Table1, the particle size becomes larger with the increasing TEOS concentration. Because the diameter of the PS core particles was not changed, this result implies that the shell thickness increases while the TEOS concentration was raised. The core-shell structure was also confirmed by the TEM image as shown in Figure2.
        Figure 1

        SEM images of the pristine PS spheres and the PS-silica core-shell spheres. (a) PC0, (b) PC3, (c) PC6, and (d) PC9.

        Table 1

        Compositions of PS-silica core-shell spheres and properties of the corresponding photonic crystals


        TEOS (M)


        Inverse opal


        dmb(shell thickness) (nm)

        dsc(shell thickness) (nm)



        Shrinkage ratiof(%)




        224 ± 2.9 (0)

        223.4 (0)







        242 ± 2.6 (20)

        241.2 (17.8)







        250 ± 4.2 (26)

        252.4 (29.0)







        262 ± 3.2 (38)

        262.5 (39.1)




        aWavelength of stop band maximum for the opal structure, observed from Figure3; bdiameter of core-shell spheres, measured from SEM images; cdiameter of core-shell spheres, calculated from Equation 1; dwavelength of stop band maximum for the inverse opals, measured from the UV–vis spectra; ediameter of air spheres, calculated from Equation 1, assuming that the thickness of the shell was fixed; festimated from the ratio of da to the pristine diameter of the PS spheres.
        Figure 2

        TEM image of the PS-silica core-shell spheres (PC9).

        Figure3 shows the transmission spectra of the opal photonic crystals prepared from the core-shell spheres. The corresponding λm has a red shift with the increase of TEOS concentration, indicating the increase of the particle size. The position of λm of photonic crystals with the FCC crystal structure can be estimated using a modified form of Bragg’s law with respect to normal incidence:
        λ m = 1.155 · a · 0.24 · n v 2 + 0.74 · f · n sh 2 + 1 f · n c 2 ,
        where a is the lattice constant; f is the volume fraction of the silica shell in the core-shell spheres; and nv, nsh, and nc are the refractive indices of the voids, the shell, and the core, respectively. Estimated from Equation 1 and Figure3, the average particle size and the shell thickness of the core-shell spheres were shown in Table1, which are in good agreement with the observation from electronic microscopy, within a difference of 3 nm.
        Figure 3

        Transmission spectra of the photonic crystals prepared from core-shell PS-silica spheres with various shell thicknesses.

        The λm of the corresponding inverse opals are shown in Figure4 and Table1. The shrinkage of air spheres in the inverse opal caused by the calcination was evaluated. Observing from Table1, without silica shell, the shrinkage ratio of air spheres reached as high as 14.7%, close to the value reported elsewhere[12, 13]. However, with the increase of the silica shell thickness, the shrinkage decreased significantly to within 3%. The improvement may result from the fact that the silica shell confined the PS space to avoid the shrinkage arising from sol–gel condensation during the high-temperature calcination.
        Figure 4

        Wavelength of stop band maximum for the inverse opals as a function of shell thickness. Curve 1: calculated from Equation 1; curve 2: calculated from Equation 1 but ignoring the shell filling effect; red square: measured from UV–vis spectra.

        According to Equation 1, the shift of λm may arise from the lattice constant and the filling volume fraction. Therefore, the shift of λm of the inverse opals prepared from the core-shell spheres was affected by lattice constant effect and shell effect, shown in Figure4. On the same lattice constant, the inverse opals prepared from the core-shell spheres can result in the larger shift of λm (curve 1 in Figure4) than the inversed opals with connective air spheres (curve 2 in Figure4) due to the shell effect (the higher filling fraction). Moreover, on the same λm, the inverse opals made by the core-shell technique have smaller air spheres and higher filling fraction than those prepared by the traditional method (not core-shell structure). The improvement may result in a stronger structure. Observing from Figure4, the position of λm is very close to the predicted point while the shell thickness is larger than 29 nm.


        We have prepared monodispersed PS-silica core-shell spheres with various shell thicknesses for the preparation of photonic crystals. With the shell protection, the shrinkage ratio with respect to the inverse opals can be significantly reduced from 14.7% to within 3%. The inverse opals prepared from the core-shell spheres have smaller air spheres and higher filling fraction than those with connective air spheres, resulting in a stronger structure.

        Authors’ information

        BTL is currently an associate professor in Yuntech, Taiwan. YLL and SXH are graduate students in Yuntech under the supervision of BTL.



        2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride

        DI water: 

        deionized water


        face-centered cubic






        tetraethyl orthosilicate.



        This study was supported financially by the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC 100-2221-E-224-038-).

        Authors’ Affiliations

        Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology


        1. Vlasov YA, Bo XZ, Sturm JC, Norris DJ: On-chip natural assembly of silicon photonic bandgap crystals. Nature 2001, 414: 289–293. 10.1038/35104529View Article
        2. Xia YN: Photonic crystals. Adv Mater 2001, 13: 369–369. 10.1002/1521-4095(200103)13:6<369::AID-ADMA369>3.0.CO;2-TView Article
        3. Lin SY, Chow E, Hietala V, Villeneuve PR, Joannopoulos JD: Experimental demonstration of guiding and bending of electromagnetic waves in a photonic crystal. Science 1998, 282: 274–276.View Article
        4. Nishijima Y, Ueno K, Juodkazis S, Mizeikis V, Misawa H, Tanimura T, Maeda K: Inverse silica opal photonic crystals for optical sensing applications. Opt Express 2007, 15: 12979–12988. 10.1364/OE.15.012979View Article
        5. Mekis A, Chen JC, Kurland I, Fan SH, Villeneuve PR, Joannopoulos JD: High transmission through sharp bends in photonic crystal waveguides. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77: 3787–3790. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3787View Article
        6. Yamamoto Y, Slusher RE: Optical processes in microcavities. Phys Today 1993, 46: 66–73.View Article
        7. Potyrailo RA, Ding ZB, Butts MD, Genovese SE, Deng T: Selective chemical sensing using structurally colored core-shell colloidal crystal films. IEEE Sens J 2008, 8: 815–822.View Article
        8. John S: Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys Rev Lett 1987, 58: 2486–2489. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2486View Article
        9. Yablonovitch E: Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys Rev Lett 1987, 58: 2059–2062. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2059View Article
        10. Jiang P, Hwang KS, Mittleman DM, Bertone JF, Colvin VL: Template-directed preparation of macroporous polymers with oriented and crystalline arrays of voids. J Am Chem Soc 1999, 121: 11630–11637. 10.1021/ja9903476View Article
        11. Schroden RC, Al-Daous M, Blanford CF, Stein A: Optical properties of inverse opal photonic crystals. Chem Mater 2002, 14: 3305–3315. 10.1021/cm020100zView Article
        12. Waterhouse GIN, Waterland MR: Opal and inverse opal photonic crystals: fabrication and characterization. Polyhedron 2007, 26: 356–368. 10.1016/j.poly.2006.06.024View Article
        13. Huang CK, Chan CH, Chen CY, Tsai YL, Chen CC, Han JL, Hsieh KH: Rapid fabrication of 2D and 3D photonic crystals and their inversed structures. Nanotechnology 2007, 18: 265305. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/26/265305View Article
        14. Richel A, Johnson NP, McComb DW: Observation of Bragg reflection in photonic crystals synthesized from air spheres in a titania matrix. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 1816–1818. 10.1063/1.126175View Article
        15. Li Y, Piret F, Leonard T, Su BL: Rutile TiO2 inverse opal with photonic bandgap in the UV-visible range. J Colloid Interface Sci 2010, 348: 43–48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.005View Article
        16. Liu ZF, Ding T, Zhang G, Song K, Clays K, Tung CH: Ternary inverse opal system for convenient and reversible photonic bandgap tuning. Langmuir 2008, 24: 10519–10523. 10.1021/la801137pView Article
        17. Ding GJ, Qian GD, Wang ZY, Qiu JR, Wang MQ: Fabrication and properties of multilayer-coated core-shell structural monodisperse spheres and close-packed structure. Mater Lett 2006, 60: 3335–3338. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.013View Article
        18. Matsushita S, Fujikawa S, Onoue S, Kunitake T, Shimomura M: Rapid fabrication of a smooth hollow-spheres array. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 2007, 80: 1226–1228. 10.1246/bcsj.80.1226View Article
        19. Yun DS, Jang HG, Yoo JW: Fabrication of uniform hollow silica nanospheres using a cationic polystyrene core. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2011, 32: 1534–1538. 10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.5.1534View Article
        20. Liu BT, Yeh WD: An innovative approach to preparation of particles with optimal size distribution: an example of SiO2. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2011, 42: 509–512. 10.1016/j.jtice.2010.08.004View Article
        21. Liu BT, Yeh WD: Antireflective surface fabricated from colloidal silica nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A 2010, 356: 145–149. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.003View Article


        © Liu et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.