Ultraviolet-ozone-treated PEDOT:PSS as anode buffer layer for organic solar cells
© Su et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 2 July 2012
Accepted: 25 July 2012
Published: 17 August 2012
Ultraviolet-ozone-treated poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)was used as the anode buffer layer in copper phthalocyanine (CuPc)/fullerene-based solar cells. The power conversion efficiency of the cells with appropriated UV-ozone treatment was found to increase about 20% compared to the reference cell. The improved performance is attributed to the increased work function of the PEDOT:PSS layer, which improves the contact condition between PEDOT:PSS and CuPc, hence increasing the extraction efficiency of the photogenerated holes and decreasing the recombination probability of holes and electrons in the active organic layers.
KeywordsOrganic solar cell PEDOT:PSS UV-ozone
Organic solar cells (OSCs) have attracted significant interests because of their potential for renewable energy source, low-cost and large-scale fabrication, and compatibility with large-area and flexible substrates . In the past two decades, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of OSCs has been steadily improved, and a PCE exceeding 8% has been demonstrated by using the materials that exhibit a broad absorption with high coefficient in the solar spectrum and by developing new device configurations that provide high exciton dissociation efficiency and charge carrier collection efficiency [2, 3]. The mechanism of OSCs involves the formation of excitons under illumination, the diffusion of excitons to the donor-acceptor interface, the dissociation of excitons into electrons and holes, and the collection of electrons and holes at opposite electrodes. One of the most important factors in determining the charge carrier collection efficiency is the interface property of electrode/organic layer. The buffer layer is often adopted in OSCs to improve the device performance. A lot of anode buffer layers have been demonstrated, such as MoO3, V2O5, NiO , WO3, and graphene oxide . Conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) film presents many advantages, such as high transparency in the visible range, high mechanical flexibility, and excellent thermal stability. These properties make it beneficial to be used as the anode buffer layer in OSCs . However, phase separation of PEDOT and PSS is generally found with the insulating PSS grains atop the as-prepared PEDOT: PSS film cast from aqueous PEDOT:PSS solution, which leads to a low conductivity below 1 S/cm and an improper contact condition between PEDOT:PSS and the following organic layer . Many strategies have been proposed to address such an issue, such as adding sorbitol [10–12], glycerol , N-methylpyrrolidone , isopropanol , dimethyl sulfoxide [13, 14], N,N-dimethyl formamide , tetrahydrofuran , ethylene glycol , 2-nitroethanol , 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone , mannitol , sodium p-toluenesulfonate , carbon nanotube , and pentacene  into PEDOT:PSS aqueous solution and treating the as-prepared PEDOT:PSS film with solvents [14, 19], thermal annealing , oxygen plasma , Ar ion sputtering , zwitterions , salt solution , and H2SO4. However, these methods make the device construction process more complex and require careful control of the technologies to avoid the deterioration of the PEDOT:PSS film properties.
Increased work function and conductivity of PEDOT:PSS film have been demonstrated by ultraviolet light irradiation [26, 27], and the treated PEDOT:PSS has been adopted as the anode buffer layer in OSCs [28, 29]. Tengstedt et al.  have proposed that the work function of PEDOT:PSS film can be increased while maintaining reasonable conductivity by UV-ozone treatment, which is further confirmed by Helander et al. . Nagata et al.  have clarified the respective roles of UV light irradiation and exposure to ozone gas on the PEDOT:PSS film, and they have found that the main role of UV light is to decompose the chemical bonds in the PEDOT:PSS film, resulting in a decrease of the conductivity, while the ozone and atomic oxygen are absorbed and oxidize the surface, leading to an increase of the work function. Thus, the UV-ozone treatment is capable of controlling the work function and conductivity of PEDOT:PSS film, hence allowing them to be adjusted to the device application. Such UV-ozone-treated PEDOT:PSS film has been adopted as the anode buffer layer in organic light-emitting diodes, and dramatic improvement of efficiency was observed [33, 34]. However, the application of UV-ozone-treated PEDOT:PSS in OSCs has not been exploited. In this paper, UV-ozone-treated PEDOT:PSS film is adopted as the anode buffer layer in copper phthalocyanine (CuPc)/fullerene (C60)-based small molecular OSCs. The power conversion efficiency of the cell was increased by more than 20%, compared with the reference cell without UV-ozone treatment. The improvement is primarily attributed to the increased work function of the PEDOT:PSS film, which improves the contact condition between PEDOT:PSS and CuPc, hence increasing the charge carrier collection efficiency and decreasing the charge carrier recombination probability in the bulk of organic layers.
Devices were fabricated on pattered indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates with a sheet resistance of 15 Ω/sq. The substrates were routinely cleaned, followed by UV-ozone treatment for 10 min. The structure of the OSCs used here was ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CuPc (30 nm)/C60(40 nm)/4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (8 nm)/Al (100 nm). Two types of PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P VP Al 4083 (H. C. Starck, Clevios GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany) and 483095 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with PEDOT/PSS mass ratio of 1:6 and 1:1.6, respectively) were used here, and they were spin-coated onto the ITO anode with a speed of 4,000 rad/min, followed by baking in vacuum at 120 °C for 1 h, which forms a PEDOT:PSS layer of about 30 nm. The PEDOT:PSS films were then treated in a UV-ozone environment for different times(0, 2, 4, 6, and 10 min) before loading into a high-vacuum chamber. The other organic layers and the cathode were deposited onto the substrates via thermal evaporation in the vacuum chamber at a pressure of approximately 10−7 Torr. Deposition rates and thickness of the layers were monitored in situ using oscillating quartz monitors. The evaporation rates were kept at approximately 1 Å/s for organic layers and Al cathode. Current–voltage (I-V) characteristics of the devices were measured with a programmable Keithley 2400 power source (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) both in dark and under illumination of a Xe lamp light source with an intensity of 100 mW/cm2. The surface characterization of PEDOT:PSS films was performed with a Bruker MultiMode 8 atomic force microscope (AFM; BRUKER, Ettlingen, Germany) in tapping mode. All the measurements were carried out at room temperature under ambient conditions.
Results and discussion
Performance of cells with Clevios P VP Al 4083 PEDOT:PSS anode buffer layer
UV treatment time (min)
Performance of the cells under illumination with a PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P VP Al 4083) anode buffer layer treated with UV-ozone for various times. FF, fill factor; PCE, power conversion efficiency.
Performance of the cells with Aldrich 483095PEDOT:PSS anode buffer layer It is appropriate
UV treatment time (min)
Performance of the cells under illumination with a PEDOT:PSS (Aldrich 483095) anode buffer layer treated with UV-ozone for various times. FF, fill factor; PCE, power conversion efficiency.
In summary, UV-ozone-treated PEDOT:PSS film was used as the anode buffer layer in CuPc/C60-based OSCs. The morphology of the PEDOT:PSS film is unaffected by the UV-ozone treatment. However, the PCE is found to increase about 20% compared to the reference cell without UV-ozone treatment. The improved performance is attributed to the increased work function of the PEDOT:PSS layer, which increases the extraction efficiency of the photogenerated holes and decreases the recombination probability of holes and electrons in the active organic layers. This work provides a facile and cost-effective method to improve the performance of OSCs. Besides, such a strategy may have potential applications to improve the contact condition between PEDOT:PSS and metal anode in inverted OSCs where a PEDOT:PSS/metal bilayer anode is adopted.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant numbers 11004187, 61076047, 61107082, and 60877027.
- Service RF: Outlook brightens for plastic solar cells. Science 2011, 332: 293. 10.1126/science.332.6027.293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He Z, Zhong C, Huang X, Wong WY, Wu HB, Chen L, Su S, Cao Y: Simultaneous enhancement of open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current density, and fill factor in polymer solar cells. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 4636–4643. 10.1002/adma.201103006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Sasabe H, Wang Z, Wang XF, Hong Z, Yang Y, Kido J: Co-evaporated bulk heterojunction solar cells with >6.0% efficiency. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 2768–2773. 10.1002/adma.201200234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shrotriya V, Li G, Yao Y, Chu CW, Yang Y: Transition metal oxides as the buffer layer for polymer photovoltaic cells. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 88: 073508. 10.1063/1.2174093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Shen L, Ruan S, Meng F, Wang J, Zhang E, Chen W: Performance improvement of inverted polymer solar cells thermally evaporating nickel oxide as an anode buffer layer. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012, 98: 379–384.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varnamkhasti MG, Fallah HR, Mostajaboddavati M, Ghasemi R, Hassanzadeh A: Comparison of metal oxides as anode buffer layer for small molecular organic photovoltaic cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012, 98: 212–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yun JM, Yeo JS, Kim J, Jeong HG, Kim DY, Noh YJ, Kim SS, Ku BC, Na SI: Solution processable reduced graphene oxide as a novel alternative to PEDOT:PSS hole transport layers for highly efficient and stable polymer solar cells. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 4923–4928. 10.1002/adma.201102207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peumans P, Forrest SR: Very-high-efficiency double-heterostructure copper phthalocyanine/C60photovoltaic cells. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 79: 126–128. 10.1063/1.1384001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kemerink M, Timpanaro S, de Kok MM, Meulenkamp EA, Touwslager FJ: Three-dimensional inhomogeneities in PEDOT PSS films. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108: 18820–18825. 10.1021/jp0464674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Granlund T, Pettersson LAA, Inganäs O: Determination of the emission zone in a single-layer polymer light-emitting diode through optical measurements. J Appl Phys 2001, 89: 5897–5902. 10.1063/1.1350998View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Johansson M, Anderssson MR, Hummelen JC, Inganäs O: Polymer photovoltaic cells with conducting polymer anode. Adv Mater 2002, 14: 662–665. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<662::AID-ADMA662>3.0.CO;2-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jönsson SKM, Birgerson J, Crispin X, Greczynski G, Osikowicz W, van der Gon AWD, Salaneck WR, Fahlman M: The effects of solvents on the morphology and sheet resistance in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT-PSS) films. Synth Met 2003, 139: 1–10. 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)01259-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JY, Jung JH, Lee DE, Joo J: Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents. Synth Met 2002, 126: 311–316. 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00576-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang JY, Xu Q, Chu CW, Yang Y, Li G, Shinar J: On the mechanism of conductivity enhancement in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate) film through solvent treatment. Polymer 2004, 45: 8443–8450. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ko CJ, Lin YK, Chen FC, Chu CW: Modified buffer layers for polymer photovoltaic devices. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 063509. 10.1063/1.2437703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan B, Mei X, Ouyang J: Significant conductivity enhancement of conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) film by adding anionic surfactants into polymer solution. Macromolecules 2008, 41: 5971–5973. 10.1021/ma8012459View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su SH, Chiang WT, Hou CC, Kao LC, Yokoyama M: Enhancing efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes using a carbon nanotube doped hole injection layer. Jpn J Appl Phys 2010, 49: 04DK12. 10.1143/JJAP.49.04DK12Google Scholar
- Kim H, Lee J, Ok S, Choe Y: Effects of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a hole-conducting layer on the performance characteristics of polymer photovoltaic cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7: 5. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia Y, Ouyang J: PEDOT:PSS films with significantly enhanced conductivities induced by preferential solvation with cosolvents and their application in polymer photovoltaic cells. J Mater Chem 2011, 21: 4927–4936. 10.1039/c0jm04177gView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y, Ballatyne AM, Nelson J, Bradley DDC: Effects of thickness and thermal annealing of the PEDOT:PSS layer on the performance of polymer solar cells. Org Electron 2009, 10: 205–209. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.10.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Y, Yuan Y, Lian J, Zhang J, Pang H, Cao L, Zhou X: Mild oxygen plasma treated PEDOT:PSS as anode buffer layer for vacuum deposited organic light-emitting diodes. Chem Phys Lett 2006, 427: 394–398. 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.06.035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang J, Amy F, Kahn A: Spectroscopic study on sputtered PEDOT·PSS: role of surface PSS layer. Org Electron 2006, 7: 387–396. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.04.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia Y, Zhang H, Ouyang J: Highly conductive PEDOT:PSS films prepared through a treatment with zwitterions and their application in polymer photovoltaic cells. J Mater Chem 2010, 20: 9740–9747. 10.1039/c0jm01593hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia Y, Ouyang JY: Anion effect on salt-induced conductivity enhancement of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) films. Org Electron 2010, 11: 1129–1135. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.04.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia Y, Sun K, Ouyang J: Solution-processed metallic conducting polymer films as transparent electrode of optoelectronic devices. Adv Mater 2012, 24: 2436–2440. 10.1002/adma.201104795View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin YJ, Yang FM, Huang CY, Chou WY, Chang J, Lien YC: Increasing the work function of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by ultraviolet irradiation. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 092127. 10.1063/1.2777147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moujoud A, Oh SH, Heo KY, Lee KW, Kim HJ: Indium zinc oxide ohmic contact to poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) induced by UV light. Org Electron 2009, 10: 785–790. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.03.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee HK, Kim JK, Park OO: Effects of UV light-irradiated buffer layer on the performance of polymer solar cells. Org Electron 2009, 10: 1641–1644. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.09.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moujoud A, Oh SH, Hye JJ, Kim HJ: Improvement in stability of poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester bulk heterojunction solar cell by using UV light irradiation. Sol Energy Mater Sol cells 2011, 95: 1037–1041. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tengstedt C, Kanciurzewska A, de Jong MP, Braun S, Salaneck WR, Fahlman M: Ultraviolet light–ozone treatment of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene)-based materials resulting in increased work functions. Thin Solid Films 2006, 515: 2085–2090. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Helander MG, Wang ZB, Greiner MT, Liu ZW, Lian K, Liu ZT: The effect of UV ozone treatment on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate). Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 173302. 10.1063/1.3257382View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagata T, Oh S, Chikyow T, Wakayama Y: Effect of UV–ozone treatment on electrical properties of PEDOT PSS film. Org Electron 2011, 12: 279–284. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.11.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benor A, Takizawa SY, Chen P, Pérez-Bolívar C, Anzenbacher PJ: Dramatic efficiency improvement in phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes with ultraviolet-ozone treated poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(4-styrenesulfonate). Appl Phys Lett 2009, 94: 193301. 10.1063/1.3132059View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benor A, Takizawa SY, Pérez-Bolívar C, Anzenbacher PJ: Efficiency improvement of fluorescent OLEDs by tuning the working function of PEDOT:PSS using UV–ozone exposure. Org Electron 2010, 11: 938–945. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.02.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu ZT, Lo MF, Wang HB, Ng TW, Roy VAL, Lee CS, Lee ST: Influence of the donor/acceptor interface on the open-circuit voltage in organic solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 093307. 10.1063/1.3222975View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.