Open Access

Photoluminescence enhancement in CdS quantum dots by thermal annealing

  • Jae Ik Kim1,
  • Jongmin Kim1,
  • Junhee Lee1,
  • Dae-Ryong Jung1,
  • Hoechang Kim1,
  • Hongsik Choi1,
  • Sungjun Lee1,
  • Sujin Byun1,
  • Suji Kang1 and
  • Byungwoo Park1Email author
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:482

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-482

Received: 12 July 2012

Accepted: 18 August 2012

Published: 29 August 2012

Abstract

The photoluminescence behavior of CdS quantum dots in initial growth stage was studied in connection with an annealing process. Compared to the as-synthesized CdS quantum dots (quantum efficiency  1%), the heat-treated sample showed enhanced luminescence properties (quantum efficiency  29%) with a narrow band-edge emission. The simple annealing process diminished the accumulated defect states within the nanoparticles and thereby reduced the nonradiative recombination, which was confirmed by diffraction, absorption, and time-resolved photoluminescence. Consequently, the highly luminescent and defect-free nanoparticles were obtained by a facile and straightforward process.

Keywords

CdS quantum dot photoluminescence quantum efficiency local strain relaxation

Background

Due to the benefits of their size-tunable physical properties [13], nanoscale semiconductor materials have promising future applications, including the optoelectronic devices such as light-emitting diodes [48] and next-generation quantum dot solar cells [914]. Moreover, nanoscale semiconductors functionalized with biomolecules are used as molecular fluorescent probes in biological applications [15].

In recent years, there has been a rapid development of the growth techniques for quantum dots with high crystallinity and narrow size distribution [1618]. The hot-injection techniques allow the affordable growth of a wide range of nanoscale materials with high quality [1921]. On the other hand, low-temperature synthesis has not been actively studied yet. Low-temperature synthesis has higher potential than hot-injection techniques because the process is relatively simple and nontoxic [22]. However, the size distribution and the crystallinity of nanoparticles are generally poor because of low synthetic temperature and surface defects [23]. Recently, several papers have introduced advanced low-temperature synthesis and colloidal growth that can yield quantum dots with a sufficiently narrow size distribution [2427].

In this regard, introducing a facile annealing process has great potential for enhancing the quantum efficiency and tuning the size of nanocrystals. However, systematic analysis of the initial growth stage of the nanoparticles has rarely been studied. In this work, a simple aqueous system and straightforward annealing process were applied to the preparation of highly luminescent CdS quantum dots. The appropriate annealing condition was well correlated with the quantum dot size, local strain (crystallinity), and radiative/nonradiative recombination rates.

Methods

The CdS quantum dots were synthesized by using a combination of the reverse-micelle method and post-growth annealing process. Cadmium chloride (CdCl2, 0.182 g) and sodium sulfide (Na2S, 0.036 g) were separately dissolved in distilled water (15 ml) and stirred to achieve their complete dissolution. Linoleic acid ((C17H31)COOH, 2.4 ml) and sodium linoleate ((C17H31)COONa, 2 g) were dissolved in ethanol (15 ml) and formed transparent solutions. After the two solutions were mixed and stirred vigorously, the color changed from transparent to opaque white, implying the formation of a microemulsion consisting of cadmium linoleate. After the addition of sodium sulfide, the color changed from white to greenish yellow. For the annealing process, the autoclave was heated at 100°C for 1 to 24 h. In order to increase the quantum dot size, post-growth annealing was also conducted at 125°C to 225°C with the same annealing time (12 h). The resultant CdS quantum dots were precipitated by using centrifugation and cleaned several times with ethanol. Finally, the CdS quantum dots were dispersed into chloroform (CHCl3, 40 ml), displaying a translucent yellow solution.

The structural properties of the quantum dots, such as crystal size and local strain, were studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD; M18XHF-SRA, MAC Science, Yokohama, Japan) with θ to 2θ curves. To analyze the optical properties, the absorbance was measured using UV/visible spectrometry, and the photoluminescence (PL) data were measured under 360-nm excitation wavelength with a spectrofluorometer (FP-6500, JASCO, Essex, UK). The binding energy of CdS quantum dots was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Sigma Probe, Thermo VG Scientific, Logan, UT, USA) using Al radiation (1,486.6 eV). Time-resolved PL was measured by using a picosecond laser system (FLS920P, Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Livingston, UK), and the nanostructures of the CdS nanoparticles were analyzed by a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-3000 F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Results and discussion

The effects of annealing on the size and crystallinity of CdS nanocrystals were investigated by XRD (Figure 1) with different annealing times. Due to the reaction of residual source during the annealing process plus coarsening behavior of nanoparticles, the average size of CdS quantum dot increases with the annealing time [24]. The diffraction peaks show the zinc-blende phase (JCPDS 75–0581) with no impurity phases. To estimate the nonuniform distribution of local strain (crystallinity) and grain size of CdS quantum dots, four diffraction peaks were fitted with the scattering vector k = 4 π / λ sin θ using a double-peak Lorentzian function, considering the effects of 1 and 2 [2831] and the instrumental-broadening effect. Before the post-growth annealing process, the size of CdS quantum dots was estimated to be approximately 2.3 nm, which gradually grew to approximately 3.7 nm with increased annealing time (in the following Figure 6). As the annealing time increases, the local strain of CdS quantum dots decreases, suggesting that defects accumulated in the CdS quantum dots during the nucleation stage are relaxed by annealing.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

X-ray diffraction of CdS quantum dots with different annealing times at 100°C.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

XPS spectra. (a) Cd 3d, (b) O 1s, and (c) S 2p with bare and 12-h-annealed samples at 100°C.

The change in the surface states of CdS quantum dots was examined by XPS (Figure 2). The XPS data of the O 1 s level display the chemical bonding of carboxyl acid, and the peak position of the Cd 3d level is not shifted after annealing. The dotted peak positions denote literature values [3234]. If the sample becomes oxidized after heat treatment, the oxygen and cadmium peaks will display changes in the chemical bonding to cadmium sulfate [3335]. This result revealed that the surface of the CdS quantum dots was not changed despite the heat treatment, which means that the linoleate surfactant is still bound to the nanocrystal surface after the 100°C annealing [26].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Effects of annealing time at 100°C. (a) Absorbance and (b) photoluminescence spectra of CdS nanoparticles as a function of annealing time at 100°C. The inset shows a normalized PL spectra.

Figure 3 shows several absorbance and PL spectra after different annealing times for the CdS nanoparticles. As the annealing time increases, the absorbance spectra exhibit a red shift relative to the bare sample (Figure 3a). The band-edge emission also shifts to higher wavelength because of the increase of quantum dot size during the annealing process (Figure 3b). The exciton peak becomes clear after 5 h of annealing, indicating improved crystallinity and size dispersity. It was observed that the absorbance intensity below the bandgap energy (E g ) decreased with increasing annealing time, which suggests that the trap-state reduction has occurred in the CdS quantum dots [25]. For the bare sample (quantum efficiency  1%), broad emission ranging from 450 to 650 nm is dominant (Figure 3b), which originates from the trap-state emission [27, 36]. In contrast, the CdS quantum dots annealed for 12 h exhibit strong and narrow band-edge emission at 440 nm (quantum efficiency  29%). These phenomena also strongly suggest that simple annealing at 100°C reduces the trap states in the CdS nanoparticles.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Effects of annealing temperature for 12 h. (a) Absorbance and (b) photoluminescence spectra of CdS nanoparticles as a function of annealing temperature for 12 h. The inset shows normalized PL spectra.

To control the radius of the nanoparticles, post-growth annealing process was further examined by varying the annealing temperature (125°C to 225°C). As shown in Figure 4a, the absorbance spectra show a red shift relative to the bare sample, confirming increased nanoparticle size with high annealing temperature. In addition, the wavelength of the band-edge emission was controlled from approximately 440 to approximately 490 nm by simply changing the annealing temperature, as shown in Figure 4b.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Time-resolved PL data as a function of annealing time at 100°C. The inset shows normalized data.

Time-resolved PL measurements were performed to determine the carrier dynamics of CdS quantum dots, as shown in Figure 5[37, 38]. The bare sample exhibits fast initial relaxation. In contrast, the initial behavior of the post-annealed samples exhibits long life decay behavior. Even though the decay curves in Figure 5 do not show single-exponential behavior, the decay curves were fitted assuming single exponential in the initial stage because the initial decay occupies a large fraction of total recombination. The samples annealed over 12 h show nearly single-exponential decay, which indicates high crystallinity and the absence of defect-related decay channels [39, 40]. This is consistent with the reduction of defect peak (approximately 550 nm) in Figure 3b after 12-h annealing. The quantum efficiency (η) is the ratio of radiative recombination to the total recombination as [41]:
η = k rad k rad + k nonrad = k rad × τ ,
(1)
where ktotalkradknonrad, and τ are the total, radiative, nonradiative recombination rates, and decay time (krad + knonrad)−1, respectively. The quantum efficiency of colloidal CdS samples was estimated by comparing with the emission of Rhodamine 6G in ethanol (quantum efficiency of approximately 95% for an excitation wavelength of 488 nm) [42]. Then, each decay time constant was obtained using the total recombination rates from the decay curves (Figure 5) and quantum efficiency.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

The correlation between local strain, quantum efficiency, recombination rate, and quantum-dot size as a function of annealing time at 100°C.

The overall properties of CdS nanoparticles were summarized in Figure 6. It is clear that the emission decay for the bare CdS is dominated by nonradiative decay, which is mediated by high-density trap states in the nanoparticles. However, the facile annealing reduces the local strain and nonradiative recombination center and thereby exhibits longer carrier lifetime and higher quantum efficiency, consistent with the TEM data of Figure 7. In this way, we straightforwardly synthesized highly luminescent CdS nanoparticles, from 1% to 29% in quantum efficiency.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-482/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_943_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

TEM image of the 12-h-annealed CdS quantum dots at 100°C (approximately 3.7 nm in diameter).

Conclusions

The luminescence properties of CdS quantum dots in the initial growth stage were examined in connection with a simple annealing process. Both the accumulated defect states and nonradiative recombination rates were reduced, and these correlations were confirmed systematically by diffraction, absorption, and time-resolved photoluminescence. Consequently, the highly luminescent (quantum efficiency of 29% from the initial 1%) and defect-free nanoparticles were obtained by a facile annealing process.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea through the World Class University (WCU, R31-2008-000-10075-0) and the Korean government (MEST:NRF, 2010–0029065).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
WCU Hybrid Materials Program, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Institute of Advanced Materials, Seoul National University

References

  1. Scholes GD, Rumbles G: Excitons in nanoscale systems. Nat Mater 2006, 5: 683–696. 10.1038/nmat1710View Article
  2. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 668–677.View Article
  3. Trindade T, O’Brien P, Pickett NL: Nanocrystalline semiconductors: synthesis, properties, and perspectives. Chem Mater 2001, 13: 3843–3858. 10.1021/cm000843pView Article
  4. Wang X, Wang ZM, Liang B, Salamo GJ, Shih CK: Direct spectroscopic evidence for the formation of one-dimensional wetting wires during the growth of InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot chains. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 1847–1851. 10.1021/nl060271tView Article
  5. Schlamp MC, Peng X, Alivisatos AP: Improved efficiencies in light emitting diodes made with CdSe(CdS) core/shell type nanocrystals and a semiconducting polymer. J Appl Phys 1997, 82: 5837–5842. 10.1063/1.366452View Article
  6. Lee SM, Choi KC, Kim DH, Jeon DY: Localized surface plasmon enhanced cathodoluminescence from Eu3+-doped phosphor near the nanoscaled silver particles. Opt Express 2011, 19: 13209–13217. 10.1364/OE.19.013209View Article
  7. Wu J, Lee S, Reddy VR, Manasreh MO, Weaver BD, Yakes MK, Furrow CS, Kunets VP, Benamara M, Salamo GJ: Photoluminescence plasmonic enhancement in InAs quantum dots coupled to gold nanoparticles. Mat Lett 2011, 65: 3605–3608. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.019View Article
  8. Li Z, Wu J, Wang ZM, Fan D, Guo A, Li S, Yu SQ, Manasreh O, Salamo GJ: InGaAs quantum well grown on high-index surfaces for superluminescent diode applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 1079–1084. 10.1007/s11671-010-9605-2View Article
  9. Shen Y, Lee Y: Assembly of CdS quantum dots onto mesoscopic TiO2 films for quantum dot-sensitized solar cell applications. Nanotechnology 2008, 19: 045602. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045602View Article
  10. Biswas S, Hossain MF, Takahashi T: Fabrication of Grtäzel solar cell with TiO2/CdS bilayered photoelectrode. Thin Solid Films 2008, 517: 1284–1288. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.010View Article
  11. Kim J, Choi H, Nahm C, Moon J, Kim C, Nam S, Jung DR, Park B: The effect of a blocking layer on the photovoltaic performance in CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 2011, 196: 10526–10531. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.052View Article
  12. Tang L, Li X, Cammarata RC, Friesen C, Sieradzki K: Electrochemical stability of elemental metal nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132: 11722–11726. 10.1021/ja104421tView Article
  13. Hu MS, Chen HL, Shen CH, Hong LS, Huang BR, Chen KH, Chen LC: Photosensitive gold-nanoparticle-embedded dielectric nanowires. Nat Mater 2006, 5: 102–106. 10.1038/nmat1564View Article
  14. Martí A, Antolín E, Stanley CR, Farmer CD, López N, Díaz P, Cánovas E, Linares PG, Luque A: Production of photocurrent due to intermediate-to-conduction-band transitions: a demonstration of a key operating principle of the intermediate-band solar cell. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 247701.View Article
  15. Bruchez M, Morrone M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP: Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science 1998, 281: 2013–2016.View Article
  16. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander EL, Muller RN: Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 2008, 108: 2064–2110. 10.1021/cr068445eView Article
  17. Sau TK, Rogach AL: Nonspherical noble metal nanoparticles: colloid-chemical synthesis and morphology control. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 1781–1804. 10.1002/adma.200901271View Article
  18. Yang H, Luan W, Tu ST, Wang ZM: Synthesis of nanocrystals via microreaction with temperature gradient: towards separation of nucleation and growth. Lab Chip 2008, 8: 451–455. 10.1039/b715540aView Article
  19. Murray CB, Norris DJ, Bawendi MG: Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J Am Chem Soc 1993, 115: 8706–8715. 10.1021/ja00072a025View Article
  20. Peng X, Manna L, Yang W, Wickham J, Scher E, Kadavanich A, Alivisatos AP: Shape control of CdSe nanocrystals. Nature 2000, 404: 59–61. 10.1038/35003535View Article
  21. Hyeon T: Chemical synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Comm 2003, 9: 927–934.View Article
  22. Zhao N, Qi L: Low-temperature synthesis of star-shaped PbS nanocrystals in aqueous solutions of mixed cationic/anionic surfactants. Adv Mater 2006, 18: 359–362. 10.1002/adma.200501756View Article
  23. Shi JW, Yan X, Cui HJ, Zong X, Fu ML, Chen S, Wang L: Low-temperature synthesis of CdS/TiO2 composite photocatalysts: influence of synthetic procedure on photocatalytic activity under visible light. J Mol Catal A 2012, 356: 53–60.View Article
  24. Wang X, Zhuang J, Peng Q, Li Y: A general strategy for nanocrystal synthesis. Nature 2005, 437: 121–124. 10.1038/nature03968View Article
  25. Kwon SG, Hyeon T: Formation mechanisms of uniform nanocrystals via hot-injection and heat-up methods. Small 2011, 7: 2685–2702. 10.1002/smll.201002022View Article
  26. Son D, Jung DR, Kim J, Moon T, Kim C, Park B: Synthesis and photoluminescence of Mn-doped zinc sulfide nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 90: 101910. 10.1063/1.2711709View Article
  27. Joo J, Na H, Yu T, Yu J, Kim Y, Xu F, Zhang J, Hyeon T: Generalized and facile synthesis of semiconducting metal sulfide nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125: 11100–11105. 10.1021/ja0357902View Article
  28. Jung DR, Kim J, Park B: Surface-passivation effects on the photoluminescence enhancement in ZnS:Mn nanoparticles by ultraviolet irradiation with oxygen bubbling. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 211908. 10.1063/1.3431267View Article
  29. Moon T, Hwang S, Jung D, Son D, Kim C, Kim J, Kang M, Park B: Hydroxyl-quenching effects on the photoluminescence properties of SnO2:Eu3+. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111: 4164–4167. 10.1021/jp067217lView Article
  30. Kim T, Oh J, Park B: Correlation between strain and dielectric properties in ZrTiO4 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 2000, 76: 3043–3045. 10.1063/1.126573View Article
  31. Warren BE: X-Ray Diffraction. Dover, New York; 1990:257–262.
  32. Rengaraj S, Venkataraj S, Jee S, Kim Y, Tai C, Repo E, Koistinen A, Ferancova A, Sillanpää M: Cauliflower-like CdS microspheres composed of nanocrystals and their physicochemical properties. Langmuir 2011, 27: 352–358. 10.1021/la1032288View Article
  33. Jin Z, Li Q, Xi C, Jian Z, Chen Z: Effect of high-temperature treatment in air ambience on the surface composition and structure of CdS. Appl Surf Sci 1988, 32: 218–232. 10.1016/0169-4332(88)90082-7View Article
  34. Kundu S, Wang Y, Xia W, Muhler M: Thermal stability and reducibility of oxygen-containing functional groups on multiwalled carbon nanotube surfaces: a quantitative high-resolution XPS and TPD/TPR study. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112: 16869–16878. 10.1021/jp804413aView Article
  35. Jang E, Jun S, Chung Y, Pu L: Surface treatment to enhance the quantum efficiency of semiconductor nanocrystals. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108: 4597–4600. 10.1021/jp049475tView Article
  36. Saunders AE, Ghezelbash A, Sood P, Korgel BA: Synthesis of high aspect ratio quantum-size CdS nanorods and their surface-dependent photoluminescence. Langmuir 2008, 24: 9043–9049. 10.1021/la800964sView Article
  37. Jones M, Nedeljkovic J, Ellingson RJ, Nozik AJ, Rumbles G: Photoenhancement of luminescence in colloidal CdSe quantum dot solutions. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107: 11346–11352. 10.1021/jp035598mView Article
  38. Wu J, Wang ZM, Dorogan VG, Li S, Mazur YI, Salamo GJ: Near infrared broadband emission of In0.35Ga0.65As quantum dots on high index GaAs surfaces. Nanoscale 2011, 3: 1485–1488. 10.1039/c0nr00973cView Article
  39. Na CW, Han DS, Kim DS, Kang YJ, Lee JY, Park J, Oh DK, Kim KS, Kim D: Photoluminescence of Cd1-xMnxS (x ≤ 0.3) nanowires. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 6699–6704. 10.1021/jp060224pView Article
  40. Sarma DD, Nag A, Santra PK, Kumar A, Sapra S, Mahadevan P: Origin of the enhanced photoluminescence from semiconductor CdSeS nanocrystals. J Phys Chem Lett 2010, 3: 2149–2153.View Article
  41. Jung DR, Son D, Kim J, Kim C, Park B: Highly luminescent surface-passivated ZnS:Mn nanoparticles by a simple one-step synthesis. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 163118. 10.1063/1.3007980View Article
  42. Fischer M, Georges J: Fluorescence quantum yield of rhodamine 6 G in ethanol as a function of concentration using thermal lens spectrometry. Chem Phys Lett 1996, 260: 115–118. 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00838-XView Article

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.