Single-photon emission from single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots grown by droplet epitaxy at high substrate temperature

  • Mohamed Benyoucef1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Verena Zuerbig1,

      Affiliated with

      • Johann Peter Reithmaier1,

        Affiliated with

        • Tim Kroh2,

          Affiliated with

          • Andreas W Schell2,

            Affiliated with

            • Thomas Aichele2 and

              Affiliated with

              • Oliver Benson2

                Affiliated with

                Nanoscale Research Letters20127:493

                DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-493

                Received: 18 July 2012

                Accepted: 21 August 2012

                Published: 31 August 2012


                The authors report single-photon emission from InGaAs quantum dots grown by droplet epitaxy on (100) GaAs substrates using a solid-source molecular beam epitaxy system at elevated substrate temperatures above 400°C without post-growth annealing. High-resolution micro-photoluminescence spectroscopy exhibits sharp excitonic emissions with lifetimes ranging from 0.7 to 1.1 ns. The coherence properties of the emitted photons are investigated by measuring the first-order field correlation function.


                III-V semiconductors Quantum dots Droplet epitaxy Single-photon emission Radiative lifetime 87.57.uh 78.67.Hc 78.55.-m 42.50.-p


                Various quantum emitters have been used to demonstrate single-photon emission, with single atoms or ions being the prototypical examples [1, 2]. Other systems capable of single-photon generation are single molecules and single nanocrystals [35]. Their main drawback is their time stability, which is restricted by photo-bleaching and blinking [6].

                Self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are the most promising zero-dimensional material system for the production of triggered single photons with high repetition rate [5, 7, 8], indistinguishable photons [9], and entangled photon pairs [10]. These are essential for quantum information and in novel photonic devices such as lasers, solar cells, detectors, and light-emitting diodes due to their ability to control their optical properties and the growth process. The Stranski-Krastanov (SK) method is the most used growth method on lattice-mismatched substrates.

                Droplet epitaxy (DE) growth method was proposed [11] as an effective way of fabricating QDs without a wetting layer (WL) for both lattice-matched and lattice-mismatched epitaxial systems. Due to the lack of a WL, the DE QDs might have improved carrier confinement with high optical quality. DE offers advantages over the conventional SK method and thus a unique route to the fabrication of unpredicted nanostructures. Typically, DE uses low temperature for QD growth to prevent material redistribution [12, 13]. However, the low-temperature growth hinders the good optical quality of the grown QD structures. Post-growth annealing processes were used for the restoration of the crystalline quality [14, 15]. Post-growth annealing at 680°C for 1 h [14] improved the photoluminescence (PL) intensity, indicating efficient passivation of defects. It should be noted that some trap defects formed during the low-temperature growth cannot be recovered even by rapid thermal annealing at very high temperature. This problem could be avoided by growing the QDs at high substrate temperatures [16].

                In this work, we report on the observation of triggered single-photon emission from a single InGaAs QD grown by DE mode on (100) GaAs substrates using a solid-source molecular beam epitaxy system at elevated substrate temperatures above 400°C. The morphological and structural properties are investigated. Their optical properties are characterized by single-dot spectroscopy and time-resolved spectroscopy. The excitonic states of a single QD are identified using power-dependent measurements on mesa-patterned samples.


                The investigated samples were grown on GaAs substrates by DE mode in a GEN II molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) system (Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY, USA) using an arsenic valved cracker cell for precise control of the As4 flux. The temperatures were measured using an optical pyrometer, and the QD formation was observed by reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED). After removal of the native oxide at 600°C under As4 flux, a 200-nm GaAs buffer layer was grown at 590°C with a growth rate of 1 monolayer (ML)/s. Then, the InGaAs QDs have been grown under constant growth conditions. The substrate temperature was decreased to desired temperatures of 410°C and 500°C, and the arsenic valve was completely closed to reach a background pressure in the order of 1 × 10−9 Torr. A nominal amount of gallium equivalent to 1.75 MLs of GaAs was deposited on the GaAs buffer layer. Then, indium droplets equivalent to an amount of 4 MLs of InAs were deposited on the Ga-stabilized surface and supplied with an As4 molecular beam flux of 10−5-Torr beam equivalent pressure for a relatively short time to crystallize the indium droplets into InGaAs QDs. The time for QD formation was determined by RHEED. The QDs were capped with a 50-nm GaAs barrier layer with a growth rate of 1 ML/s without growth interruption. A second QD layer was grown on the top of the sample at the same growth conditions as the first QD layer for morphology investigations. Then, the samples were rapidly cooled down without arsenic pressure and taken out from the MBE chamber. For this study, we investigate two samples: Sample (A) and sample (B) consist of InGaAs QDs grown on a (100) GaAs substrate at 410°C and 500°C, respectively. It should be noted that no post-growth and rapid thermal annealing processes were applied in this study.

                The PL measurements are performed at 5 K. The sample is mounted in a helium flow cryostat which can be moved using computer-controlled xy-linear stages with a spatial resolution of 100 nm. A microscope objective (NA = 0.7) is used to focus continuous wave (cw) laser with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm for micro-photoluminescence (μPL) measurements and a Ti:sapphire laser operating at 845 nm for photon correlation and time-resolved measurements. The same microscope objective was used to collect the QD emission. The collected luminescence was then spectrally filtered using a 0.75-m focal length monochromator equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device for PL measurements. For photon statistics measurements, the PL light is directly sent to a modified Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) correlation setup. The HBT consisted of a 50/50 non-polarizing beam splitter, two bandpass filters used to select a specific emission line, and two single-photon counting avalanche photodiodes (APDs), each providing a time resolution of approximately 700 ps. The lifetime measurements are performed using time-correlated single-photon counting technique. The signal is detected using a fast APD with a temporal resolution of about 50 ps.

                Results and discussion

                From atomic force microscope studies (data not shown here), the QD density decreases from approximately 1011 to approximately 5 × 109 cm−2 with increasing substrate temperature from 410°C to 500°C, respectively, due to the larger diffusion length of the indium atoms at higher substrate temperature which shows a behavior similar to SK growth mode. The optical properties of the QD ensemble characterized by macro-photoluminescence (not shown here) show that the emission wavelength of QDs formed at 410°C is blueshifted in comparison to that of QDs formed at 500°C due to the smaller size of dots. The energy peak and the full width at half maximum of a QD ensemble grown at 500°C are similar to those of QDs grown by SK which is an indication for the good optical quality of the QDs formed by DE. For the following, we focus on single-QD investigations.

                Figure 1a shows a PL spectrum of an ensemble of QDs taken from 10-μm mesa size grown by DE at 410°C. The spectrum exhibits many sharp emission peaks within 910 to 940 nm. To clearly distinguish the emission peaks from a single QD, we fabricated small mesa structures with size ranging from 200 to 700 nm and measured the μPL spectrum near 920 and 940 nm, where the density of QDs is relatively low. A typical PL spectrum of a single QD taken from 0.5-μm mesa size at very low laser excitation power is shown as inset of Figure 1a with a PL linewidth of around 110 μeV observed for single QDs, which is larger than those of the best SK-grown QDs. This could be ascribed to spectral diffusion related to the charging and discharging of trap defects in the QD surroundings. Figure 1b displays PL spectra of a single QD in 0.5-μm mesa size under cw optical excitation, recorded for different laser excitation powers. At low excitation power, only one excitonic line is seen which attributed to an exciton (X). As the power is increased, a second line appears assigned to a biexciton (XX) line. The intensity of the X line shows approximately linear power dependence, whereas the intensity of the XX line shows a superlinear increase (data not shown here). At high cw excitation powers, the X line reaches a saturation behavior before the XX line. It should also be noted that the biexciton binding energy is around 3-5 meV which is comparable to SK-grown QDs.
                Figure 1

                Low-temperature photoluminescence taken from mesa structures. (a) μPL spectrum of QDs taken from 10-μm mesa size grown by DE at 410°C; the inset is a typical PL spectrum of a single QD taken from 0.5-μm mesa size at very low laser excitation power. (b) PL spectra of a single QD under cw optical excitation, recorded for different laser excitation powers.

                The fact that at high excitation powers no groups of lines appear to higher energies in Figure 1b is strong evidence for the existence of only one pair of electron and hole levels in the QD. To demonstrate triggered single-photon generation, we measured the second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) of X photon under pulsed excitation. Figure 2a shows the measured unnormalized correlation function n(τ) of the X emission of the single QD. The corresponding PL spectrum is shown in Figure 1b. All displayed measurements were performed at relatively low excitation power. The measured n(τ) consists of series of correlation peaks separated by the repetition period. The central peak at τ = 0 ns of the QD X emission is suppressed with a value below 0.5, a signature of a single-photon emission. For perfect single-photon emission, the central peak is absent indicating the generation of only one photon per pulse. Time-resolved PL measurements are performed to understand the dynamics of the recombination process. Figure 2b shows the measured X lifetime of the single QD with a value of 0.7 ns, which is shorter compared to typical X lifetimes of single QDs grown by SK mode.
                Figure 2

                Triggered single-photon and time-resolved PL measurement. (a) Triggered single-photon emission of the X line from single QD grown by DE at 410°C; the corresponding PL spectrum is shown in Figure 1b taken at a relatively low laser excitation power of 500 nW. (b) The X lifetime.

                Figure 3a displays a PL spectrum of single QDs grown at 500°C with an excitonic linewidth of about 80 μeV. This indicates good optical properties of the grown DE QDs but is larger than those of the best SK-grown QDs. As reported in previous works, the linewidth is attributed to spectral diffusion, caused by charge rearrangement in the QDs’ environment [17]. Further investigations are necessary to get better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the line broadening. Autocorrelation measurements have also been performed to demonstrate single-photon generation under cw excitation of X line the single QD grown at 500°C. The inset of Figure 3a shows the measured unnormalized correlation function g(2)(τ) of the X QD emission at 5 K. The trace exhibits a clear dip in the correlation counts for the time delay τ = 0 ns, indicating a strong photon antibunching. The g(2)(0) < 0.5 is a signature of a single quantum emitter. The measured g(2)(0) does not reach its theoretical value of 0 because of the presence of uncorrelated background.
                Figure 3

                Autocorrelation and time-resolved measurements. (a) Autocorrelation measurement of the X line from a single QD grown by DE at 500°C. (b) The corresponding X lifetime at a laser excitation power of 500 nW.

                To confirm the improvement in optical quality, we have also performed time-resolved μPL measurements on single QDs in sample B. Figure 3b shows typical time-resolved PL of the X line of single QD. While the excitonic lifetimes of QDs in sample A are less than 0.8 ns, those of sample B are larger than 1.1 ns. These results confirm the improved optical quality of QDs grown at 500°C. This could be due to the removal of excess arsenic atoms which act as effective nonradiative recombination centers. The increased radiative lifetime for QDs grown at 500°C compared to QDs grown at 410°C could also be due to the increasing QD size, which has been predicted theoretically [18] and also reported experimentally [19]. This could likely be due to variation of the e-h overlap induced by different QD morphologies and by piezoelectric effects [20]. However, further investigations are necessary to classify the nature of the defects related to the excess arsenic incorporation by using low-density QD samples.

                We now report on the measurements of the first-order correlation function, g(1)(τ), which provides direct experimental access to the coherence properties of the emitter. In addition, time-resolved PL studies complement these measurements and allow the comparison of lifetime and coherence time. The PL emission from the QD is passed through a Michelson interferometer to carry out Fourier transform spectroscopy [21, 22] and deduce the coherence time, T2, of the emitted photons. The visibility curves of the laser and the X line from the single QD grown at 500°C are plotted in Figure 4. The curves with points show the measurement data, and the solid line is an exponential fitting to the data. A T2 value of 35 ps is extracted from the fitting. The measured T2 value is much shorter compared to the radiative lifetime, T1, of approximately 1.1 ns, which could be due to dephasing that originated from fluctuating charges which accumulate in the vicinity of the dots. It should be noted that the samples used in this study were nano-patterned to have small-sized mesas ranging from 200 to 700 nm. Many charge-trapping defects can exist, especially at the sidewalls of the mesa structures, which generate stronger electric fields compared to bulk samples without mesa structures. As a result, these stronger fields appear as larger spectral diffusion. This partially explains the short T2 which could be due to dephasing. Further investigations to clarify this issue are necessary.
                Figure 4

                Fourier transforms spectroscopy. Visibility curves of the laser and the excitonic line from a single QD grown at 500°C.


                In conclusion, we have demonstrated single-photon emission from single InGaAs QDs grown by droplet epitaxy at elevated substrate temperatures. Excitation power-dependent and time-resolved micro-photoluminescence (TRμPL) measurements were performed at low temperature to characterize the optical properties of the excitonic states. TRμPL measurements showed an increase in lifetime from 0.70 to 1.16 ns with the increasing substrate temperature, which could be related to the removal of excess arsenic atoms that act as nonradiative recombination centers and the increased QD sizes. The lifetime characteristics were attributed to good quantum confinement of carriers in DE-grown QDs.



                We acknowledge F. Schnabel, A. Dirk, and K. Fuchs for the technical support. This work was supported by the BMBF (QuaHL-Rep).

                Authors’ Affiliations

                Institute of Nanostructure Technologies and Analytics (INA), CINSaT, University of Kassel
                Nano-Optik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin


                1. Kuhn A, Hennrich M, Rempe G: Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking. Phys Rev Lett 2002, 89: 067901.View Article
                2. Keller M, Lange B, Hayasaka K, Lange W, Walther H: Continuous generation of single photons with controlled waveform in an ion-trap cavity system. Nature (London) 2004, 431: 1075–1078. 2004. 2004. 10.1038/nature02961View Article
                3. Brunel C, Lounis B, Tamarat P, Orrit M: Triggered source of single photons based on controlled single molecule fluorescence. Phys Rev Lett 1999, 83: 2722–2725. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2722View Article
                4. Lounis B, Moerner WE: Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature. Nature (London) 2000, 407: 491–493. 10.1038/35035032View Article
                5. Michler P, Kiraz A, Becher C, Schoenfeld WV, Petroff PM, Zhang L, Hu E, Imamoglu A: A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 2000, 290: 2282–2285. 10.1126/science.290.5500.2282View Article
                6. Nirmal M, Dabbousi BO, Bawendi MG, Macklin JJ, Trautman JK, Harris TD, Brus LE: Fluorescence intermittency in single cadmium selenide nanocrystals. Nature (London) 1996, 383: 802–804. 10.1038/383802a0View Article
                7. Gérard JM, Gayral B: Strong purcell effect for InAs quantum boxes in three-dimensional solid-state microcavities. J Lightwave Technol 1999, 17: 2089–2095. 10.1109/50.802999View Article
                8. Benyoucef M, Ulrich SM, Michler P, Wiersig J, Jahnke F, Forchel A: Correlated photon pairs from single (In, Ga)As/GaAs quantum dots in pillar microcavities. J Appl Phys 2005, 97: 023101. 10.1063/1.1809251View Article
                9. Santori C, Fattal D, Vučković J, Solomon GS, Yamamoto Y: Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature (London) 2002, 419: 594–597. 10.1038/nature01086View Article
                10. Stevenson RM, Young RJ, Atkinson P, Cooper K, Ritchie DA, Shields AJ: A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs. Nature (London) 2006, 439: 179–182. 10.1038/nature04446View Article
                11. Koguchi N, Takahashi S, Chikyow T: New MBE growth method for InSb quantum well boxes. J Crystal Growth 1991, 111: 688–692. 10.1016/0022-0248(91)91064-HView Article
                12. Koguchi N: Toward the fabrication of site-controlled III-V compound semiconductor quantum dots by droplet epitaxy. J Korean Physical Society 2004, 45: 650–655.
                13. Wang ZM, Holmes K, Mazur YI, Ramsey KA, Salamo GJ: Self-organization of quantum-dot pairs by high-temperature droplet epitaxy. Nanoscale Res Lett 2006, 1: 57–61. 10.1007/s11671-006-9002-zView Article
                14. Watanabe K, Tsukamoto S, Gotoh Y, Koguchi N: Photoluminescence studies of GaAs quantum dots grown by droplet epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 2001, 227: 1073–1077.View Article
                15. Sanguinetti S, Mano T, Gerosa A, Somaschini C, Bietti S, Koguchi N, Grilli E, Guzzi M, Gurioli M, Abbarchi M: Rapid thermal annealing effects on self-assembled quantum dot and quantum ring structures. J Appl Phys 2008, 104: 113519. 10.1063/1.3039802View Article
                16. Zürbig V, Bugaew N, Reithmaier JP, Kozub M, Musiał A, Sęk G, Misiewicz J: Growth temperature dependence of wetting layer formation in high density InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot structures grown by droplet epitaxy. Jpn J Appl Phys 2012, 51: 085501.View Article
                17. Abbarchi M, Troiani F, Mastrandrea C, Goldoni G, Kuroda T, Mano T, Sakoda K, Koguchi N, Sanguinetti S, Vinattieri A, Gurioli M: Spectral diffusion and line broadening in single self-assembled GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dot photoluminescence. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 162101. 10.1063/1.3003578View Article
                18. Stier O, Grundmann M, Bimberg D: Electronic and optical properties of strained quantum dots modeled by 8-band k·p theory. Phys Rev B 1999, 59: 5688–5701. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.5688View Article
                19. Boggess TF, Zhang L, Deppe DG, Huffaker DL, Cao C: Spectral engineering of carrier dynamics in In(Ga)As self-assembled quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 2001, 78: 276–278. 10.1063/1.1337638View Article
                20. Heitz R, Veit M, Ledentsov NN, Hoffmann A, Bimberg D, Ustinov VM, Kop’ev PS, Alferov ZI: Energy relaxation by multiphonon process in InAs/GaAs quantum dots. Phys Rev B 1997, 56: 10435–10445. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10435View Article
                21. Kammerer C, Cassabois G, Voisin C, Perrin M, Delalande C, Roussignol P, Gérard JM: Interferometric correlation spectroscopy in single quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 2002, 81: 2737–2739. 10.1063/1.1510158View Article
                22. Benyoucef M, Wang L, Rastelli A, Schmidt OG: Toward quantum interference of photons from independent quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 261908. 10.1063/1.3275702View Article


                © Benyoucef et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.