Open Access

Effects of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a hole-conducting layer on the performance characteristics of polymer photovoltaic cells

  • Hyunsoo Kim1,
  • Jungrae Lee1,
  • Sunseong Ok1 and
  • Youngson Choe1Email author
Contributed equally
Nanoscale Research Letters20127:5

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-5

Received: 9 September 2011

Accepted: 5 January 2012

Published: 5 January 2012

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of pentacene-doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene:poly(4-styrenesulfonate) [PEDOT:PSS] films as a hole-conducting layer on the performance of polymer photovoltaic cells. By increasing the amount of pentacene and the annealing temperature of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS layer, the changes of performance characteristics were evaluated. Pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin films were prepared by dissolving pentacene in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone solvent and mixing with PEDOT:PSS. As the amount of pentacene in the PEDOT:PSS solution was increased, UV-visible transmittance also increased dramatically. By increasing the amount of pentacene in PEDOT:PSS films, dramatic decreases in both the work function and surface resistance were observed. However, the work function and surface resistance began to sharply increase above the doping amount of pentacene at 7.7 and 9.9 mg, respectively. As the annealing temperature was increased, the surface roughness of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films also increased, leading to the formation of PEDOT:PSS aggregates. The films of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS were characterized by AFM, SEM, UV-visible transmittance, surface analyzer, surface resistance, and photovoltaic response analysis.

Keywords

electronic materials polymers vapor deposition electrochemical measurement electrochemical properties

Background

Recently, among the photovoltaic cells considered as renewable energy sources, organic photovoltaic cells such as nanoscale polymer semiconductors have been intensively developed [1]. As alternative technologies to conventional photovoltaic cells, polymer bulk-heterojunction [BHJ] photovoltaic cells have gained great attention since they have several advantages such as low-cost fabrication, mechanical flexibility [2, 3], and easy fabrication process including spin-coating [4]. The BHJ-structured device is an intimate blend of donor and acceptor materials that are phase-separated into nanodomains, where one or both materials absorb photons to form bound electron-hole pairs (excitons). An interpenetrating network in the BHJ structure provides a large interfacial area for efficient exciton dissociation [5, 6], leading to high efficiency of device performance.

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene:poly(4-styrenesulfonate) [PEDOT:PSS] is the most widely utilized polymer as a hole-conducting layer of OLED and photovoltaic cells [7]. The advantages of PEDOT:PSS include low temperature, excellent stability, large area processing, low cost, and flexibility. However, the efficiency of this material is limited by its low carrier mobility [8]. Therefore, hole mobility is a key parameter for photovoltaic devices with respect to their adoption in device applications. Pentacene has been extensively studied as a p-type semiconductor in organic field-effect transistors, and the field-effect hole mobility of pentacene is reported to be about 1.5 cm2/Vs [9, 10]. In addition, pentacene has long exciton diffusion length and well-suited absorption spectrum. Because the advantages offered by pentacene are attributed to a good semiconducting behavior, many theoretical and experimental studies were focused on its crystal structure, morphology, optical, and electrical transport properties [1113]. Many researchers have reported on photovoltaic applications of pentacene as a dopant into a hole-conducting layer [14, 15], an interlayer for polymer BHJ photovoltaic cells and a donor material [16]. Surface morphology, work function, and transmittance of the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films improve a high hole mobility and conductivity.

In this study, poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) [P3HT] and [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester [PCBM] were blended and used as an active layer in polymer BHJ photovoltaic cells. The performance characteristics of polymer photovoltaic cells using pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a hole-conducting layer have been investigated. In details, an investigation is taken to understand the effect of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films on the performance of polymer photovoltaic cells with various amounts of pentacene in a PEDOT:PSS solution. We present the fabrication of efficient polymer photovoltaic cells by optimizing the parameters including the amount of pentacene and annealing temperature of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin films, which are important parameters because these can affect power conversion efficiency.

Methods

Materials

Indium tin oxide [ITO] thin films were used as the anode because they combine unique transparency and conducting properties. They have a wide bandgap (3.8 eV) and show high transmission in the visible wavelength (80 ~ 90%) and relatively high work function. The ITO glass substrates were supplied from Samsung Corning Precision Materials Co., Ltd. (Gumi-si, South Korea). PEDOT:PSS aqueous solution (Baytron P VP A14083;1.3 wt.%) as a buffer-layer material was purchased from H. C. Starck (Goslar, Germany). 1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinine [NMP] as a solvent, pentacene as a doping material, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene as a solvent were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Seoul, South Korea). P3HT as an electron donor was purchased from Rieke Metal Inc. (Lincoln, NE, USA). PCBM as an electron acceptor was purchased from Nano-C (Westwood, MA, USA). Aluminum as a cathode was purchased from CERAC™, Inc. (Milwaukee, WI, USA).

Device fabrication

The pre-patterned ITO glass substrates were cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and isopropyl alcohol (1:1:1) for 1 h by sonication and then rinsed by ethanol. After cleaning, the ITO glass substrates were annealed at 230°C for 10 min in vacuum and served as high-work-function electrode. PEDOT:PSS and pentacene were used as buffer-layer materials. Various amounts of pentacene (1.3, 3.3, 5.5, 7.7, and 9.9 mg) were dissolved in 3.2 g of NMP solvent. The color of the pentacene solution became dark purple and slowly turned into intense yellow as the dissolution time increased. The PEDOT:PSS solution was filtered using a 0.45-μm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, Seoul, South Korea), and then the pentacene solution was mixed with 3.2 g of PEDOT:PSS. PEDOT:PSS solutions containing pentacene were stirred for 1 h and then spin-coated on the ITO substrate at 2,000 RPM for 20 s using a digitalized spin coater (MS-A10, Mikasa Co., Ltd., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan). The pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin films were annealed for 1 h at 120°C, 140°C, 160°C, and 180°C in vacuum to remove the aqueous PSS. After the annealing process, the devices were cooled down to room temperature. The typical thickness of the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin film was about 40 nm in this work.

The BHJ of the active-layer thin film was prepared via a solution process. P3HT and PCBM were dissolved into 1,2-dichlorobenzene in a weight ratio of 1:0.9 and various concentrations of 2.0 wt.% solution. The blend of P3HT and PCBM was stirred for 24 h at 40°C. The blend of the P3HT:PCBM solution was spin-casted on the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS buffer layer at 1,000 RPM for 40 s. The thickness of the P3HT:PCBM blend's thin film is about 450 nm. After the spin-coating, to form the active layer, a cathode electrode, Al, was deposited onto the active layer by thermal evaporation in vacuum with a thickness of 100 nm. The thickness was measured using a well-calibrated quartz crystal thickness monitor (CRTM-600, ULVAC KIKO Co., Ltd., Yokohama-shi, Kanggawa, Japan). The vacuum pressure was under 3 × 10-5 torr, and the deposition rate of aluminum was controlled at 1 ~ 5 Å/s. The fabricated devices were subsequently post-annealed for 10 min at 150°C in vacuum condition.

Results and discussion

For the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin films, the UV-visible transmittance spectra are shown in Figure 1. As the amount of pentacene was increased, the UV-visible transmittance intensity slightly increased in the wavelength range of 300 ~ 800 nm. Therefore, the transmittance was dependent on the amount of pentacene doped in the PEDOT:PSS solution. Despite the increase in transparency of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films, there is no relationship between transparency and conductivity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

UV-visible transmittance spectra of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films. The inset shows the magnified spectra from 530 to 550 nm.

The work function variations and surface resistance of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The surface resistance was determined from the average value of measurements at multiple points on one sample in ambient condition. For a reliable analysis, the thickness of pristine PEDOT:PSS and pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films are fixed at about 40 nm. The work function and surface resistance decreased as the amounts of pentacene were increased in the PEDOT:PSS films. However, with pentacene amounts of 7.7 and 9.9 mg, the work function was slightly increased. The work function is correlative with the Voc value and hole-charge mobility to increase device efficiency [17]. The work function of the pristine PEDOT:PSS film was approximately 5.20 eV, and it decreases dramatically from 5.2 to 4.9 eV when it is doped with pentacene. The work function of PEDOT:PSS has been limited by charge collection because the work function of PEDOT:PSS film is higher than that of the HOMO level of pentacene. The bandgap of the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS film has been approached to the ITO substrate. Therefore, the amount of pentacene has been optimized to 5.5 mg, and the charge collection efficiency for the 5.5 mg of pentacene-doped film has been significantly increased; consequently, holes can easily move to the ITO substrate. By increasing the amount of pentacene in PEDOT:PSS films, a dramatic increase in the surface resistance is observed. With 7.7 and 9.9 mg of pentacene in PEDOT:PSS films, there were steep increases in the surface resistance, indicating that the conductivity of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films significantly decreases as the pentacene doping amount exceeds 5.5 mg.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Work function of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Surface resistance of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films.

Atomic force microscopy [AFM] images of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films after annealing treatments are shown in Figure 4. After the amount of pentacene was optimized to 5.5 mg, the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin film was thermally annealed. As the annealing temperature was increased, the polymer aggregate or grain size also increased, and eventually, the continuous interfaces are formed, which improve conductivity through the interfaces of grains. As the annealing temperature was increased, the root-mean-square [RMS] surface roughness of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films increased as well because the grain size has increased. For the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS annealed at 120°C for 1 h, a surface with an RMS roughness of 4.843 nm was observed. The pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films annealed at 140°C, 160°C, and 180°C show an RMS roughness of 5.267, 7.774, and 8.838 nm, respectively. Since the roughness is considered to be a signature of phase separation as well as grain formation in an active layer, the increase in the roughness of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films leads to an improvement in the conductivity and charge mobility on their regions.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

AFM images of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films. Annealed at (a) 120°C, (b) 140°C, (c) 160°C, and (d) 180°C for 1 h.

At the lowest annealing temperature, the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS film shows uniformly dispersed small grains, indicating that crystalline density is high as shown in Figure 5. The low nucleation density leads to a large grain size at high temperature, thus leading to more grain boundaries [18]. As the annealing temperature increases, the grain surface also increases, leading to enhanced interfacial adhesion between buffer layer and active layer phases. It is observed in typical organic devices that the measured hole mobility increases along with the increase of the annealing temperature, starting to increase at a low temperature and saturating at a high temperature. The pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a buffer layer exhibited annealing temperature dependence of charge mobility. Consequently, the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS film which is annealed at 180°C exhibits better molecular microstructure on the film surface and higher charge mobility.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

SEM images of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS films. Annealed at (a) 120°C, (b) 140°C, (c) 160°C, and (d) 180°C for 1 h.

The current density-voltage characteristics of polymer photovoltaic cells are shown in Figure 6. The polymer photovoltaic cells with the structure of ITO/pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS (40 nm; 180°C) and photovoltaic cells with the structure of ITO/pentacene (40 nm; 180°C for 1 h)/P3HT:PCBM (2.0 wt.%; 1:0.9)/Al (100 nm) were fabricated. The device containing the PEDOT: PSS film has a Jsc of 12.46, and the overall PCE of 3.74% was obtained for this device. For the device containing pentacene (5.5 mg)-doped PEDOT:PSS as a buffer layer, the Jsc increases from 12.46 to 16.91 mA/cm2. Finally, the power conversion efficiency of 5.25% has been achieved. This improvement is attributed to an increase in the conductivity and work function resulting from pentacene doping into the PEDOT:PSS buffer layer. It is believed that the roughness of the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS film may induce the contact area between the buffer layer and the active layer. The hole-transporting ability is enhanced when increasing the conductive domains, therefore, leading to an improvement in Jsc. However, its value was slightly decreased to 15.31 and 14.81 mA/cm2 for 7.7 and 9.9 mg of pentacene doping, respectively. In this study, we demonstrated that a power conversion efficiency of 5.25%, by optimizing pentacene doping to 5.5 mg, has been achieved, and the annealing temperature of 180°C is preferred.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-5/MediaObjects/11671_2011_Article_381_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

J - V characteristics of polymer photovoltaic devices using pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a hole-conducting layer.

Conclusions

In summary, the performance characteristics of polymer BHJ photovoltaic cells using pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS as a buffer layer and a P3HT/PCBM-blended active layer have been investigated. By doping pentacene into PEDOT:PSS, the conductivity and carrier mobility of the buffer layer were improved. As the amount of pentacene was increased, the work function decreased. The bandgap of the pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS film has been approached to the ITO substrate. The surface resistance decreased by pentacene doping in PEDOT:PSS films was also observed. In a morphological aspect, as the annealing temperature of pentacene-doped PEDOT:PSS thin films was increased, PEDOT:PSS formed aggregates or grains, which eventually improve the conductivity and hole-charge mobility. In this study, a power conversion efficiency of 5.25% has been achieved by doping pentacene into a PEDOT:PSS film.

Authors' information

HK, JL, and SO are students of a Master's degree in the Chemical Engineering Department, Pusan National University, South Korea. YC is a professor in the Chemical Engineering Department, Pusan National University, South Korea.

Notes

Abbreviations

AFM: 

atomic force microscopy

BHJ: 

bulk-heterojunction

HOMO: 

highest occupied molecular orbital

ITO: 

indium tin oxide

J sc

short circuit current

NMP: 

1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinine

OLED: 

organic light-emitting diodes

PCBM: 

[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester

PEDOT: 

PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene:poly(4-styrenesulfonate)

PTFE: 

polytetrafluoroethylene

P3HT: 

poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl)

RMS: 

root mean square

SEM: 

scanning electron microscopy

V oc

open circuit voltage.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0003825) and the Brain Korea 21 Project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Pusan National University

References

  1. Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA, Ferrazza F: 19.8% efficient ''honeycomb'' textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 1998, 73: 1991–1993. 10.1063/1.122345View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS, Hummelen JC: Plastic solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 2001, 11: 15–16. 10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-AView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Coakley KM, McGehee MD: Conjugated polymer photovoltaic cells. Chem Mater 2004, 16: 4533–4542. 10.1021/cm049654nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Green R, Morfa A, Ferguson AJ, Kopidakis N, Rumbles G, Shaheen SE: Performance of bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices prepared by airbrush spray deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 033301–033303. 10.1063/1.2836267View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Katz HE: Organic molecular solids as thin film transistor semiconductors. J Mater Chem 1997, 7: 369–376. 10.1039/a605274fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Reese MO, White MS, Rumbles G, Ginley DS, Shaheen SE: Optimal negative electrodes for poly(3-hexylthiophene):[6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 053307–053309. 10.1063/1.2841067View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Groenendaal LB, Zotti G, Aubert PH, Waybright SM, Reynolds JR: Electrochemistry of poly(3,4-alkylenedioxythiophene) derivatives. Adv Mater 2003, 15: 855–879. 10.1002/adma.200300376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang KS, Chen Y, Lim HK, Cho KY, Han KJ: Performance enhancement of polymer Schottky diode by doping pentacene. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517: 6096–6099. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson SF, Lin YY, Gundlach DJ, Jackson TN: Temperature-independent transport in high-mobility pentacene transistors. Appl Phys. Lett 1998, 72: 1854–1856. 10.1063/1.121205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruiz R, Papadimitratos A, Mayer AC, Malliaras GG: Thickness dependence of mobility in pentacene thin-film transistors. Adv Mater 2005, 17: 1795–1798. 10.1002/adma.200402077View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Knipp D, Street RA, Völkel A, Ho J: Pentacene thin-film transistors on inorganic dielectrics: morphology, structural properties, and electronic transport. J Appl Phys 2003, 93: 347–355. 10.1063/1.1525068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoneya N, Noda M, Hirai N, Nomoto K, Wada M, Kasahara J: Reduction of contact resistance in pentacene thin-film transistors by direct carrier injection into a-few-molecular-layer channel. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 4663–4665. 10.1063/1.1814443View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Signerski R, Jarosz G, Godlewski J: Photovoltaic properties of tetracene and pentacene layers. Macromol Symp 2004, 212: 357–362. 10.1002/masy.200450842View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen WB, Xiang HF, Xu ZX, Yan BP, Roy VAL, Che CM, Lai PPT: Improving efficiency of organic photovoltaic cells with pentacene-doped CuPc layer. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 191109–191111. 10.1063/1.2806195View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim JH, Huh SY, Kim TI, Lee HH: Thin pentacene interlayer for polymer bulk-heterojunction solar cell. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 143305–143307. 10.1063/1.2998583View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pandey AK, Unni KN, Nunzi JM: Pentacene/perylene co-deposited solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2006, 511–512: 529–532.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kyaw AK, Sun XW, Jiang CY, Lo GQ, Zhao DW, Kwong DL: An inverted organic solar cell employing a sol-gel derived ZnO electron selective layer and thermal evaporated MoO3 hole selective layer. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93: 221107–221109. 10.1063/1.3039076View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Waldauf C, Morana M, Denk P, Schilinsky P, Coakley K, Choulis SA, Brabec CJ: Highly efficient inverted organic photovoltaics using solution based titanium oxide as electron selective contact. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 233517–233519. 10.1063/1.2402890View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.