Cyclotron resonance in HgTe/CdTe-based heterostructures in high magnetic fields
© Zholudev et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 17 July 2012
Accepted: 15 September 2012
Published: 26 September 2012
Cyclotron resonance study of HgTe/CdTe-based quantum wells with both inverted and normal band structures in quantizing magnetic fields was performed. In semimetallic HgTe quantum wells with inverted band structure, a hole cyclotron resonance line was observed for the first time. In the samples with normal band structure, interband transitions were observed with wide line width due to quantum well width fluctuations. In all samples, impurity-related magnetoabsorption lines were revealed. The obtained results were interpreted within the Kane 8·8 model, the valence band offset of CdTe and HgTe, and the Kane parameter E P being adjusted.
KeywordsCyclotron resonance HgTe/CdTe heterostructures HgTe quantum wells Far-IR magnetospectroscopy
HgTe/CdTe-based quantum wells (QWs) exhibit a number of remarkable properties. At the critical HgTe QW thickness (6.3 to 7 nm depending on Cd content in the barrier), the forbidden gap is absent and both electrons and holes are characterized by the linear energy-momentum law of massless Dirac fermions [1, 2]. When HgTe QW width exceeds this critical value, the energy band structure is inverted (the conduction band states are formed by p-type wavefunctions while s-type wavefunctions form the valence band states; see, e.g., [1, 3] and references therein). In the inverted band structure regime, HgTe QWs are shown to be two-dimensional (2D) topological insulators that have attracted a great fundamental interest [1, 2, 4, 5]. It was demonstrated  that a quantum spin Hall insulator state exists in such systems that can be destroyed by magnetic field due to crossing of Landau levels of different bands . Actually, these two levels have recently shown to display the effect of the avoided crossing [7, 8]. Hole-like symmetry of conduction-band Bloch functions enhances spin-dependent effects like the Rashba splitting that has been shown to achieve 30 meV [3, 9]. Wide HgTe/CdTe QWs have an indirect band structure . If the well is wide (above 12.5 nm), the side maxima of the valence band overlap with the conduction band. Then, the Fermi level can cross both valence and conduction bands and a semimetallic state can be implemented which has been revealed by magnetotransport measurements [11, 12]. On the other hand, narrow HgTe QWs have been proposed as a material for detectors of THz radiation since they possess certain advantages over bulk HgCdTe solid solutions that are widely used for mid-infrared (IR) photodetectors. An alternative way to tune the QW structure is to admix Cd into a wide HgTe QW. In [13, 14], 30-nm-wide Hg1-xCd x Te QWs with a Cd content x > 0.13 are shown to have normal band structure. However, properties of such wells are not identical to those of normal-band-structure HgTe QWs with the same bandgap, namely wide HgCdTe QWs demonstrate indirect band structure, i.e., the side maximum in the valence band exceeds that in the center of the Brillouin zone. An informative method to probe the energy band structure both in bulk semiconductors and in QWs is the cyclotron resonance (CR) technique. However, at the moment, there have been no systematic studies on CR in HgTe/CdTe QWs with different band structures (cf.[6–9, 13–19]). In this work, we present the first results on CR measurements in a semimetallic sample with wide HgTe QW (inverted band structure) as well as in two samples with normal band structures: narrow HgTe QW (for the first time) and wide HgCdTe (about 15% of cadmium).
QW width (nm)
CR studies were carried out at T=4.2 K on 5×5 mm samples placed in the liquid helium. We used two superconducting coils having maximum magnetic fields of 3 and 11 T. CR spectra were measured in the Faraday configuration in two ways: by sweeping the magnetic field up to 3 T at a constant frequency of the terahertz radiation and in a static magnetic field up to 11 T. In the first case, the radiation was generated using quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) operating at 2.6, 3.2, and 4.3 THz (pulse length 10 μ s, repetition rate 5 to 10 kHz). The radiation transmitted through the sample was detected using a Ge:Ga impurity photodetector. In the second case, a BRUKER 113V Fourier transform (FT) spectrometer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used with a globar radiation source. The spectral resolution was 4 cm-1. The transmitted radiation was detected by a composite bolometer. The measured spectra presented here were normalized by sample transmission at B=0 and then divided by the rate of reference signals (signal without sample) at nonzero and zero magnetic fields. The latter enables us to eliminate the influence of the magnetic field on the bolometer sensitivity.
CR measurements in static magnetic fields up to 11 T were carried out in the Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses in Grenoble (LNCMI-G). All other measurements were performed at the Institute for Physics of Microstructures in Nizhny Novgorod.
The band structure in the absence of the magnetic field and the Landau levels (LLs) in the QWs under study were calculated in the axial approximation in the same way as described in [19, 21] in the four-band model. The calculation is based on the envelope function method proposed by Burt . The envelope functions were found as the solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation with the 8·8 Hamiltonian taking into account a built-in strain. To calculate the envelope functions and the corresponding values of the electron energy, the structure was approximated by a superlattice of weakly interacting QWs. The lattice period was chosen such that the interaction between the wells would not significantly affect the energy spectrum. The calculation was performed by expanding the envelope functions in plane waves. The expression for the Hamiltonian of the heterostructure grown on the (013) plane was derived by the method described in . The components of the built-in strain tensor were calculated with the use of the formulas from . The band parameters of the materials used in the calculation are taken from . Two parameters of the model were adjusted to get better agreement between calculated and measured transition energies. The first parameter is the valence band offset of CdTe and HgTe. This parameter is not known well and, according to , is 570 ± 60 meV. We have used the value 620 meV. The second parameter is the Kane parameter E P which is the same for both materials according to the model used. We assumed E P as 20.8 eV (instead of 18.8 eV ). The difference between the results of our calculations with ‘traditional’ and ‘adjusted’ parameters is shown on fan charts for all three samples under study. The dependences of all parameters, except the bandgap, on the content of the solid solution Hg1-xCd x Te were assumed to be linear in x. The concentration dependence of the bandgap was described by the formula from . It should be noted that the axial approximation we used is quite good for the conduction band but can give a small error for the valence band (see, for example, Figure one in ). According to our estimations, using axial approximation could result in the error in LL energies in the valence band up to 2 meV (16 cm-1).
Results and discussion
The second strong line Π is a hole CR apparently. It crosses X-axes in a nonzero magnetic field (≈5 T), which means that the transition takes place between LLs crossing approximately in this field. The only allowed transition satisfying this condition is the one in the valence band. Some discrepancy between measured and calculated energies (see Figure 3) is due to violation of axial approximation. Thus, line Π is the first observed hole CR in HgTe QWs in quantizing magnetic fields. A weaker line Πican be, by analogy, attributed to the transitions between the filled LL n = 1 in the valence band and impurity state pertained to empty LL n = 0.
In the magnetic field range 3.5 to 5 T in the CR spectra in sample 1, we have observed a weaker line α that is known to result from the interband transition [6, 7, 19]. In B < 3.5 T, LL n = 1 seems to be occupied and the absorption decreases, while in B>5 T, the ‘initial’ level n = 0 seems to rise over the Fermi level.
Weak high-frequency lines I1 to I3 probably resulted from some interband transitions (cyclotron or impurity). At the moment, it is difficult to identify them only because of the great number of allowed transitions between valence and conduction band LLs in this frequency range. At last, the line U whose spectral position does not depend on the magnetic field most probably resulted from transitions between impurity states pertained to LLs n = − 2 in the valence and conduction bands (since direct transitions between these two LLs are forbidden in the Faraday configuration).
Experimental data obtained in sample 2 with both the FT spectrometer and the QCLs, as well as calculated energies of allowed transitions between conduction band LLs versus magnetic field are presented in Figure 5. It is clearly seen that the data obtained with different techniques correspond fairly well (see lower left corner in Figure 5). Besides, using QCL operating at 4.3 THz made it possible to measure CR in the phonon absorption band around 150 cm-1 (see Figure 2) due to a high stability of QCL radiation intensity.
The main lines in absorption spectra in sample 2 are α, γ, and δ. This sample has a normal band structure; therefore, all the transitions take place within the conduction band. The LL structure is analogous to that of sample 100708 studied earlier (see Figure one in ). Line α corresponds to the transition from the lowest LL in the conduction band. In high magnetic fields over 4 T, the LL filling factor is less than unity and all the electrons in the QW occupy LL n=0; therefore, only CR line α is observed. However, in lower magnetic fields, the electrons populate the next LL n = − 1 (see Figure one in ) and the transitions (line γ) are observed. At still smaller magnetic fields, the third LL in the conduction band is occupied that leads to a decrease in the intensity of transition (line α) and in the appearance of line δ(transition ).
The observed intensive absorption line γ− is to be considered separately. Its position corresponds fairly well to the transition between two lowest LLs . In magnetic fields over 5.5 T, where this line is observed, LL n = 0 is filled while that of n = − 1 is empty. However, according to our calculations within the axial model, the square of the electrodipole matrix element for this transition is by 4 orders of magnitude less than that for transition (line α). Actually, the transition corresponds to electron spin resonance that should not be observed in the Faraday configuration. Nevertheless, line γ− is clearly seen in the absorption spectra. Probably, this line resulted from transitions between shallow-donor impurity states pertained to LLs 0 and − 1. It is also possible that because of the absence of the axial symmetry in reality, the square of the matrix element for this transition will be significantly higher. In any case, the origin of line γ− (which has been observed in a number of samples with normal band structure) requires further investigations.
Weak line αi seems to result from the transition between the 1s-like state of residual shallow donors pertained to LL n = 0 and the excited 2p+ -like state pertained to LL n = 1. In contrast to impurity lines βi and Πi observed in sample 1 with inverted band structure (Figure 3), the energy of the transitions corresponding to line αi exceeds that of line α since the binding energy of the 1s-like ground state is greater than that of the excited 2p+-like state. The origin of other weak lines observed in the absorption spectra in sample 2 requires further studies.
The nature of the most intense low-frequency line in CR spectra U1 is not quite clear. It persists up to the maximal magnetic field used (11 T) when the LL filling factor is much less than unity, so it cannot be attributed to transitions between higher LLs in the conduction band. On the other hand, the transition energies are much less than the bandgap. Therefore, the only reasonable explanation is to attribute this absorption line to intracenter excitation of residual donors. In wide QWs (such as in sample 2), the shallow-donor binding energies are small compared to those of the CR ones because of small electron effective masses (of the order 10-2m0, where m0 is the free electron mass). However, in narrow QWs, the donor binding energies increase significantly since the QW potential pushes the donor wavefunction to the impurity ion. A weaker absorption line U2 seems to result from some impurity interband transition since the line is as broad as line β. As a whole, the accordance between measured and calculated data in sample 3 with the narrowest QW (Figure 7) is worst than those in samples 1 and 2 with wider QWs. The latter means that the theoretical model for the description of such narrow QWs is to be elaborated.
In conclusion, we have measured CR in a set of nominally undoped HgCdTe QWs with different band structures in quantizing magnetic fields. The results obtained are interpreted on the basis of Landau level calculations within the Kane 8·8 model. In wide semimetallic HgTe QWs with inverted band structure, both intra- and interband transitions between Landau levels are identified, the CR line being accompanied by impurity satellites. A hole CR line has been observed for the first time. In two samples with normal band structure: wide (30 nm) HgCdTe QW and narrow (4.8 nm) HgTe QW, interband CR transitions have been revealed in the spectra, the interband absorption line width in the narrow QW being spread due to QW width fluctuations. The adjusted material parameters: valence band offset of CdTe and HgTe 620 meV (instead of 570 meV) and the Kane parameter E P 20.8 eV (instead of 18.8 eV), are proposed from the comparison of the experimental and calculation data.
quantum cascade laser
We are grateful to Yu.G. Sadof’ev and Trion Technology Inc., USA, for providing us with quantum cascade lasers. This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 11-02-00958, 11-02-97061, and 11-02-93111), the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (state contract nos. 16.740.11.0321 and 16.518.11.7018), the Council of the President of the Russian Federation for Support of Young Scientists and Leading Scientific Schools (project nos. MK-1114.2011.2 and NSh-4756.2012.2), and the Russian Academy of Sciences. The Montpellier team would also like to acknowledge the CNRS via GDR-I project ‘Semiconductor sources and detectors of THz frequencies’ and the GIS-Teralab.
- Bernevig A, Hughes T, Zhang SC: Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 2006, 314(5806):1757–1761. 10.1126/science.1133734View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Büttner B, Liu CX, Tkachov G, Novik EG, Brüne C, Buhmann H, Hankiewicz EM, Recher P, Trauzettel B, Zhang SC, Molenkamp LW: Single valley Dirac fermions in zero-gap HgTe quantum wells. Nat Phys 2011, 7: 418–422. 10.1038/nphys1914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gui YS, Becker CR, Dai N, Liu J, Qiu ZJ, Novik EG, Schäfer M, Shu XZ, Chu JH, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW: Giant spin-orbit splitting in a HgTe quantum well. Phys Rev B 2004, 70: 115328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- König M, Wiedmann S, Brüne C, Roth A, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW, Qi XL, Zhang SC: Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells. Science 2007, 318(5851):766–770. 10.1126/science.1148047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- König M, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW, Hughes T, Liu CX, Qi XL, Zhang SC: The quantum spin Hall effect: theory and experiment. J Phys Soc Jpn 2008, 77(3):031007. 10.1143/JPSJ.77.031007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz M, Merkt U, Sonntag A, Rössler U, Winkler R, Colin T, Helgesen P, Skauli T, Løvold S: Crossing of conduction- and valence-subband Landau levels in an inverted HgTe/CdTe quantum well. Phys Rev B 1998, 57: 14772–14775. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.14772View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orlita M, Masztalerz K, Faugeras C, Potemski M, Novik EG, Brüune C, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW: Fine structure of zero-mode Landau levels in HgTe/HgxCd1-xTe quantum wells. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 115307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zholudev M, Teppe F, Orlita M, Consejo C, Torres J, Dyakonova N, Wróbel J, Grabecki G, Mikhailov N, Dvoretskii S, Ikonnikov A, Spirin K, Aleshkin V, Gavrilenko V, Knap W: Magnetospectroscopy of 2D HgTe based topological insulators around the critical thickness. Phys Rev B unpublished unpublished
- Spirin KE, Ikonnikov AV, Lastovkin AA, Gavrilenko VI, Dvoretskii SA, Mikhailov NN: Spin splitting in HgTe/CdHgTe (013) quantum well heterostructures. JETP Lett 2010, 92: 63–66. 10.1134/S0021364010130126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ortner K, Zhang XC, Pfeuffer-Jeschke A, Becker CR, Landwehr G, Molenkamp LW: Valence band structure of HgTe/Hg1-xCdxTe single quantum wells. Phys Rev B 2002, 66(7):075322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kvon ZD, Olshanetsky EB, Kozlov DA, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretskii SA: Two-dimensional electron-hole system in a HgTe-based quantum well. JETP Lett 2008, 87(9):502–505. 10.1134/S0021364008090117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gusev GM, Olshanetsky EB, Kvon ZD, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretsky SA, Portal JC: Quantum Hall effect near the charge neutrality point in a two-dimensional electron-hole system. Phys Rev Lett 2010, 104(16):166401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikonnikov AV, Lastovkin AA, Spirin KE, Zholudev MS, Rumyantsev VV, Maremyanin KV, Antonov AV, Aleshkin VY, Gavrilenko VI, Dvoretskii SA: Terahertz spectroscopy of quantum-well narrow-bandgap HgTe/CdTe-based heterostructures. JETP Lett 2010, 92(11):756–761. 10.1134/S0021364010230086View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikonnikov AV, Zholudev MS, Maremyanin KV, Spirin KE, Lastovkin AA, Gavrilenko VI, Dvoretskii SA, Mikhailov NN: Cyclotron resonance in HgTe/CdTe(013) narrowband heterostructures in quantized magnetic fields. JETP Lett 2012, 95(8):406–410. 10.1134/S002136401208005XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz M, Heinrichs F, Merkt U, Colin T, Skauli T, Løvold S: Rashba spin splitting in a gated HgTe quantum well. Semicond Sci Technol 1996, 11(8):1168. 10.1088/0268-1242/11/8/009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kvon ZD, Danilov SN, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretsky SA, Prettl W, Ganichev SD: Cyclotron resonance photoconductivity of a two-dimensional electron gas in HgTe quantum wells. Phys E 2008, 40(6):1885–1887. 10.1016/j.physe.2007.08.115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozlov DA, Kvon ZD, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretskii SA, Portal JC: Cyclotron resonance in a two-dimensional semimetal based on a HgTe quantum well. JETP Lett 2011, 93(3):170–173. 10.1134/S0021364011030088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kvon ZD, Danilov SN, Kozlov DA, Zoth C, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretskii SA, Ganichev SD: Cyclotron resonance of Dirac ferions in HgTe quantum wells. JETP Lett 2012, 94(11):816–819. 10.1134/S002136401123007XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikonnikov AV, Zholudev MS, Spirin KE, Lastovkin AA, Maremyanin KV, Aleshkin VY, Gavrilenko VI, Drachenko O, Helm M, Wosnitza J, Goiran M, Mikhailov NN, Dvoretskii SA, Teppe F, Diakonova N, Consejo C, Chenaud B, Knap W: Cyclotron resonance and interband optical transitions in HgTe/CdTe(013) quantum well heterostructures. Semicond Sci Technol 2011, 26(12):125011. 10.1088/0268-1242/26/12/125011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dvoretsky S, Mikhailov N, Sidorov Y, Shvets V, Danilov S, Wittman B, Ganichev S: Growth of HgTe quantum wells for IR to THz detectors. J Electron Mater 2010, 39(7):918–923. 10.1007/s11664-010-1191-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Novik EG, Pfeuffer-Jeschke A, Jungwirth T, Latussek V, Becker CR, Landwehr G, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW: Band structure of semimagnetic Hg1-yMnyTe quantum wells. Phys Rev B 2005, 72(3):035321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burt MG: The justification for applying the effective-mass approximation to microstructures. J Phys: Condens Matter 1992, 4(32):6651. 10.1088/0953-8984/4/32/003Google Scholar
- Becker CR, Latussek V, Pfeuffer-Jeschke A, Landwehr G, Molenkamp LW: Band structure and its temperature dependence for type-III HgTe/Hg1-xCdxTe superlattices and their semimetal constituent. Phys Rev B 2000, 62(15):10353–10363. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.10353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.