Magnetic anisotropy in isotropic and nanopatterned strongly exchange-coupled nanolayers
© Vergara et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 2 August 2012
Accepted: 7 October 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
In this study, the fabrication of magnetic multilayers with a controlled value of the in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy field in the range of 12 to 72 kA/m was achieved. This fabrication was accomplished by the deposition of bilayers consisting of an obliquely deposited (54°) 8-nm-thick anisotropic Co layer and a second isotropic Co layer that was deposited at a normal incidence over the first layer. By changing the thickness value of this second Co layer (X) by modifying the deposition time, the value of the anisotropy field of the sample could be controlled. For each sample, the thickness of each bilayer did not exceed the value of the exchange correlation length calculated for these Co bilayers. To increase the volume of the magnetic films without further modification of their magnetic properties, a Ta spacer layer was deposited between successive Co bilayers at 54° to prevent direct exchange coupling between consecutive Co bilayers. This step was accomplished through the deposition of multilayered films consisting of several (Co8 nm-54°/CoX nm-0°/Ta6 nm-54°) trilayers.
KeywordsMagnetic multilayers Exchange coupling Magnetic anisotropy 75.70.-i 75.30.Gw 81.15.Fg
Considerable research effort has recently been devoted to fabricating new materials that have an optimum response to electromagnetic fields in the ultrahigh frequency (UHF) range. This effort has been motivated by advancements in electromagnetic devices such as personal computers, palmtop terminals and cell phones. For instance, the recording heads of computer hard drives have demanded the use of materials that have optimum performance in the UHF range. The increasing value of the density of information stored in these drives has required an increase in the rate at which information is written and read from these devices. This speed can reach 2 Gbit/s, which forces the hard disk drive heads to perform optimally at frequencies on the order of several gigahertz.
In addition, the operating frequencies of the mobile phone standards (UMTS) are also in the range of frequencies of approximately 0.9 (GSM) or 2.1 GHz (3G). Furthermore, wireless Bluetooth networks operate at frequencies of 2.4 GHz, and local area wireless networks, Wi-Fi, work at 5.4 GHz. Therefore, the devices used either in cell phones or phone stations or in wireless communications systems must be adapted for use in the range of frequencies from 1 to 6 GHz.
In this scenario, the requirements for magnetic materials, usually in the form of films, that operate in the gigahertz range of frequencies are as follows:
A high value for the saturation magnetisation, MS
A high value for the electrical resistivity, ρ
The presence of an in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy whose value should be controllable to fulfil the frequency requirements of the devices in which these materials are present
Different techniques have been used to induce and control the in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy value in films. For example, a magnetic field has been applied during the deposition process or during a post-deposition heat treatment[4–7]. Furthermore, thin films have been deposited onto pre-patterned substrates[8–10]. Finally, off-axis deposition has also been used[11–19].
Using the previously described techniques, several works have reported control over the in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy value. For instance, Li et al. fabricated FeCoHf films by co-sputtering both a Fe-Co target and a Hf target. Upon increasing the Hf content, the value of the anisotropy field increased. Furthermore, Chai et al. deposited CoNb/Ta multilayers and observed that the value of the anisotropy field could increase to 40 kA/m when the thickness of the Ta layer was decreased. Similarly, McMichael et al. deposited thin Co films on obliquely deposited Ta underlayers, and anisotropy fields greater than 120 kA/m were measured in the samples. Furthermore, Zuo et al. fabricated FeCoSi films that were partially oxidised after the samples were exposed to an oxygen flow. The values of the saturation magnetisation and the anisotropy field of these samples were larger in the samples that had a thicker ferromagnetic layer. Finally, it was recently reported that the value of the magnetic anisotropy in FeCoHfO films could be modified by changing the sputtering power.
Nanocrystalline Co films have previously been fabricated using the pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique, and it has already been reported that an in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy could be induced in these films by oblique deposition. Particularly, for 90-nm-thick Co films, the value of the magnetic anisotropy field was relatively low (up to 8 kA/m) for samples deposited at angles of incidence up to 50°, but the value of the anisotropy field increased to 40 kA/m when the angle of incidence was increased to 55° due to the formation of nanostrings on the surface of the sample, although a further increase in the deposition angle to 60° did not modify the value of the magnetic anisotropy field. Therefore, the former abrupt change in the value of the anisotropy field in such a narrow range of deposition angles presented a drawback for the desired accurate control over the value of the anisotropy field.
In our present work, we detail a procedure to control the value of the magnetic anisotropy field, in the range of 12 to 72 kA/m, in ferromagnetic films produced using the PLD technique. This procedure was based on the deposition of bilayers and consists of the following:
a nanopatterned Co layer deposited at an angle of 54° and
an isotropic Co layer deposited at normal incidence (deposition angle 0°).
Co/Co/Ta multilayers were deposited using PLD in a stainless-steel chamber (Neocera, Beltsville, MD, USA) at a base pressure of 10−5 mbar. We used a pulsed Nd-YAG laser (Brilliant, Quantel, Newbury, UK) with a wavelength, λ, of 1,064 nm; frequency of 20 Hz; and pulse duration of 5 ns. The average energy per unit area on the surface of the target was 0.2 GW/cm2 during the laser pulses. These targets were Co disks and Ta sheets (99.95% purity) from Goodfellow Cambridge, Ltd. (Huntingdon, UK). During the deposition process, the targets were rotated at 32 rpm to avoid excessive heating of the region irradiated by the laser. The incidence angle of the laser beam on the target surface was 45°.
Using this geometry, we deposited Co/Co/Ta multilayers on a 6-nm-thick Ta buffer layer. The thickness of the initial Co layer, which was deposited at 54°, was 8 nm. The thickness of the subsequent Co layer deposited at normal incidence (0°) was changed for the different samples from 1 to 20 nm by increasing the deposition time. The 6-nm-thick Ta layer was also obliquely deposited at 54°. The thickness of each layer was monitored using a quartz microbalance.
The magnetic moment of the samples was measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, EG&G, Princeton, NJ, USA), and the saturation magnetisation of the deposits (μ0MS = 1.4 T) was determined through Hall effect measurements. From the ratio of the magnetic moment to the saturation magnetisation, we calculated the sample volume and, consequently, the sample thickness. We used this procedure to determine the thicknesses of both the normally deposited Co layers and the obliquely deposited Co layers because the deposition rates in each case were different. The values of these thicknesses were used as input parameters in our deposition controller, which was based on a quartz microbalance, to monitor the thickness and deposition rate of the Co films. On this basis, the thickness and deposition rates of Ta could also be monitored by adjusting the values of the density and the Z-factor for Ta in the deposition controller.
Results and discussion
where A is the exchange stiffness constant (for calculations, we used the value of 2.8 × 10−11 J/m that corresponds to nanocrystalline Co), K u (1/2 μ0MSH K ) is the uniaxial magnetic anisotropy energy density of a particular PLD film and H K is the anisotropy magnetic field. In our samples, lex is on the order of several tens of nanometres (20 to 50 nm) depending on the particular value of K u for a given sample. A similar scenario is observed in exchange spring magnets composed of strongly exchange-coupled soft and hard magnetic layers[29–31]. In these systems, it was also demonstrated that on increasing the thickness of the soft magnetic layer beyond lex, the soft and the hard layers decoupled magnetically.
Therefore, it is possible to control the value of the anisotropy field of a PLD film by changing the thickness of one of the layers. In our particular case, the thickness of the obliquely deposited Co layer will remain fixed at 8 nm. (In a previous study, we measured the value of the magnetic anisotropy field of Co films deposited by PLD at 55°, whose thicknesses varied between 1 and 100 nm. We observed that a maximum value of the anisotropy field was measured for the 8-nm-thick Co films.) The thickness of the layer deposited at normal incidence will vary between 1 and 20 nm. Therefore, the resulting thickness of the bilayer, which was less than 30 nm, was significantly smaller than the thickness of films typically used for UHF applications, which are on the order of 100 nm. This length is smaller than the penetration depth of the electromagnetic wave in the UHF range, which in this type of nanocrystalline material is typically 1 μm.
To test the effect of a spacer layer, we fabricated Co layers with a non-magnetic separation layer between each layer to avoid direct exchange coupling among them. We used a 6-nm-thick Ta spacer layer because a magnetic coupling between the obliquely and normally deposited Co layers was observed for smaller thicknesses of the Ta spacer layer.
We measured the magnetic hysteresis loops of the resulting Co/Ta/Co trilayers, where one of the Co layers was 4-nm-thick and obliquely deposited at 54° and the other layer was also 4-nm-thick but normally deposited. These results are presented in Figures 2 and 3. Because the 6-nm-thick Ta spacer layer prevented direct exchange coupling between the magnetic layers, the resulting Co4 nm-54°/Ta/Co4 nm-0° trilayer behaved like the superposition of each of the individual Co layers, without averaging the magnetic properties in this case. Therefore, the hysteresis loops of the Co4 nm-54°/Ta/Co4 nm-0° trilayer along the easy magnetisation axis revealed the existence of two nucleation fields that correspond to each of the Co layers (Figure 2d). However, when the magnetic field was applied along the hard magnetisation axis (of the obliquely deposited Co layer), an initial increase in the magnetisation at a relatively low applied magnetic field was observed. Furthermore, this abrupt increase was followed by a progressive increase of the magnetisation as the value of the applied magnetic field was increased to 56 kA/m, at which the saturation of the magnetisation was reached (Figure 3d). This behaviour reinforced the fact that the Ta spacer layer magnetically uncoupled, in this case, the obliquely and the normally deposited Co layers. Some schematic drawings of the normal and obliquely deposited layers and the magnetically coupled and uncoupled multilayers are shown in Figure 2.
where H K is the value of the anisotropy field of either the obliquely deposited Co layer (54 kA/m for this fit) or the normally deposited Co layer (0 kA/m) and t is the thickness of the Co layer, deposited either at 54° (tCo-54°) or at 0° (tCo-0°).
According to this particular model, there appears to be a good agreement between the experimental and theoretical values of the anisotropy field at relatively large values of the thickness of the normally deposited Co layer. The disagreement observed at low values could be due to interface effects that are not considered within this model for strongly exchange-coupled layers. A further study of this effect will be addressed in a future work.
Multilayered samples have been fabricated using a pulsed laser deposition technique. Each sample consisted of a set of four trilayers, and each trilayer consisted of different nanolayers, as indicated below:
First, an obliquely deposited (angle 54°) 8-nm-thick Co layer, which presented an in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy.
Second, a normally deposited (angle 0°) Co layer, whose thickness varied between 1 and 20 nm, that was isotropic. These two layers were strongly exchange-coupled, and because the thickness of this resulting bilayer was smaller than the exchange correlation length for Co, the magnetic properties of the resulting bilayer were an average of the magnetic properties of the individual layers. Therefore, each bilayer behaved as a single magnetic macromolecule.
Third, an obliquely deposited (angle 54°) 6-nm-thick Ta layer that was deposited on top of the Co bilayer described above. This Ta spacer layer prevented possible direct exchange coupling between neighbouring Co bilayers. Therefore, it was possible to increase the volume of the sample by increasing the number of trilayers without changing the magnetic properties of the Co bilayers.
In the multilayered samples, an in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy was observed, and the value of the magnetic anisotropy field directly depended on the thickness of the normally deposited Co layer, which, in our case, was the only variable. Therefore, this magnetic anisotropy could be tailored by controlling the deposition time of the normally deposited Co layer. In our samples, the anisotropy field ranged from 12 to 72 kA/m.
This work was partially supported by the Spanish government under project MAT2007-66252.
- Wood R: Future hard disk drive systems. J Magn Magn Mater 2009, 321: 555–561. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.07.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taratorin A, Yuan S, Nikitin V: High data rate recording: moving to 2 Gbit/s. J Appl Phys 2003, 93: 6444–6446. 10.1063/1.1557342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korenivski V: GHz magnetic film inductors. J Magn Magn Mater 2000, 215: 800–806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van de Riet E, Klaassens W, Roozeboom F: On the origin of the uniaxial anisotropy in nanocrystalline soft-magnetic materials. J Appl Phys 1997, 81: 806–814. 10.1063/1.364164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka T, Takahashi M, Kadowaki S: Induced uniaxial magnetic anisotropy and preferred orientation in Co and Co-Ni alloy by magnetic annealing. J Appl Phys 1998, 84: 6768–6772. 10.1063/1.369006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katada H, Shimatsu T, Watanabe I, Muraoka H, Sugita Y, Nakamura Y: Induced uniaxial magnetic anisotropy field in very thin NiFe and CoZrNb films. IEEE Trans Magn 2000, 36: 2905–2908. 10.1109/20.908623View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katada H, Shimatsu T, Watanabe I, Muraoka H, Nakamura Y, Sugita Y: Induced uniaxial magnetic anisotropy and film magnetostriction in very thin permalloy films. IEEE Trans Magn 2001, 37: 2334–2336. 10.1109/20.951164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chuang DS, Ballentine CA, O'Handley RC: Surface and step magnetic-anisotropy. Phys Rev B 1994, 49: 15084–15095. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.15084View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawakami RK, Bowen MO, Choi HJ, Escorcia-Aparicio EJ, Qiu ZQ: Effect of atomic steps on the magnetic anisotropy in vicinal Co/Cu(001). Phys Rev B 1994, 58: R5924-R5927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng P-H, Bain JA, Kryder MH: The effect of surface topography on the soft magnetic properties of FeAlN films. IEEE Trans Magn 1995, 31: 2700–2702. 10.1109/20.490097View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith DO: Anisotropy in permalloy films. J Appl Phys 1959, 30: S264-S265. 10.1063/1.2185921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen MS: Anisotropy in permalloy films evaporated at grazing incidence. J Appl Phys 1961, 31: S87-S88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knorr TG, Hoffman RW: Dependence of geometric magnetic anisotropy in thin iron films. Phys Rev B 1959, 113: 1039–1046. 10.1103/PhysRev.113.1039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fujiwara H, Hara K, Kamiya M, Okamoto K: Columnar growth in evaporated iron films. J Magn Magn Mater 1983, 35: 296–298. 10.1016/0304-8853(83)90524-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Dijken S, Di Santo G, Poelsema B: Influence of the deposition angle on the magnetic anisotropy in thin Co films on Cu(001). Phys Rev B 2001, 63: 104431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jen SU, Chung CM, Chen WL: Magnetic properties of Co35Pd65 films made by oblique-incidence deposition. J Magn Magn Mater 2000, 220: 205–213. 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00487-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alameda JM, Torres M, López F: On the physical origin of inplane anisotropy axis switch in oblique-deposited thin-films. J Magn Magn Mater 1986, 62: 209–214. 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90146-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alameda JM, Carmona F, Salas FH, Álvarez-Prado LM, Morales R, Pérez GT: Effects of the initial stages of film growth on the magnetic anisotropy of obliquely-deposited cobalt thin films. J Magn Magn Mater 1996, 154: 249–253. 10.1016/0304-8853(95)00577-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoshi Y, Suzuki E, Naoe M: Uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of iron thin films deposited by oblique incidence of deposition particles. J Appl Phys 1996, 79: 4945–4947. 10.1063/1.361597View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li S, Liu M, Xu F, Lou J, Tian Z, Wu J, Hu Y, Cai X, Duh J-G, Sun NX: Soft magnetism and microwave magnetic properties of Fe-Co-Hf films deposited by composition gradient sputtering. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 07A315. 10.1063/1.3549584Google Scholar
- Chai GZ, Yang Y, Zhu J, Lin M, Sui W, Guo D, Li X, Xue D: Adjust the resonance frequency of (Co90Nb10/Ta)(n) multilayers from 1.4 to 6.5 GHz by controlling the thickness of Ta interlayers. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 012505. 10.1063/1.3290252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McMichael RD, Lee CG, Bonevich JE, Chen PJ, Miller W, Egelhoff WF Jr: Strong anisotropy in thin magnetic films deposited on obliquely sputtered Ta underlayers. J Appl Phys 2000, 88: 5296–5299. 10.1063/1.1323436View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zuo HP, Ge S, Wang Z, Xiao Y, Yao D, Li Y: High-frequency properties of discontinuous FeCoSi/native-oxide multilayer films. J Magn Magn Mater 2009, 321: 3453–3456. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.06.052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu G, Zhang H, Xiao JQ, Bai F, Tang X, Li Y, Zhong Z: Influence of sputtering power on the high frequency properties of nanogranular FeCoHfO thin films. J Appl Phys 2011, 109: 07A327. 10.1063/1.3563063Google Scholar
- Madurga V, Vergara J, Favieres C: Magnetic domain structures and nano-string morphology of laser off-normal deposited amorphous cobalt films with controlled magnetic anisotropy. J Magn Magn Mater 2004, 272: 1681–1683.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dan Dahlberg E, Riggs K, Prinz GA: Magnetotransport: an ideal probe of anisotropy energies in epitaxial films. J Appl Phys 1988, 63: 4270–4275. 10.1063/1.340200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heinrich B, Cochran JF: Ultrathin metallic magnetic-films: magnetic anisotropies and exchange interactions. Adv Phys 1993, 42: 523–639. 10.1080/00018739300101524View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michels A, Weissmüller J, Wiedenmann A, Pedersen JS, Barker JG: Measuring the exchange-stiffness constant of nanocrystalline solids by elastic small-angle neutron scattering. Philos Mag Lett 2000, 80: 785–792. 10.1080/0950083001000180SView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skomski R, Coey JMD: Giant energy product in nanostructured two-phase magnets. Phys Rev B 1993, 48: 15812–15816. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.15812View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leineweber T, Kronmüller H: Micromagnetic examination of exchange coupled ferromagnetic nanolayers. J Magn Magn Mater 1997, 176: 145–154. 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00601-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Takahashi YK, Gopalan R, Hono K: Sm(Co, Cu)5/Fe exchange spring multilayer films with high energy product. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 86: 122509. 10.1063/1.1889238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghidini M, Asti G, Pellicelli R, Pernechele C, Solzi M: Hard-soft composite magnets. J Magn Magn Mater 2007, 316: 159–165. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.040View ArticleGoogle Scholar