Mechanical properties of sintered meso-porous silicon: a numerical model

  • Roberto Martini1, 2Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Valerie Depauw2,

      Affiliated with

      • Mario Gonzalez2,

        Affiliated with

        • Kris Vanstreels2,

          Affiliated with

          • Kris Van Nieuwenhuysen2,

            Affiliated with

            • Ivan Gordon2 and

              Affiliated with

              • Jef Poortmans1, 2

                Affiliated with

                Nanoscale Research Letters20127:597

                DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-597

                Received: 30 April 2012

                Accepted: 1 October 2012

                Published: 29 October 2012

                Abstract

                Because of its optical and electrical properties, large surfaces, and compatibility with standard silicon processes, porous silicon is a very interesting material in photovoltaic and microelectromechanical systems technology. In some applications, porous silicon is annealed at high temperature and, consequently, the cylindrical pores that are generated by anodization or stain etching reorganize into randomly distributed closed sphere-like pores. Although the design of devices which involve this material needs an accurate evaluation of its mechanical properties, only few researchers have studied the mechanical properties of porous silicon, and no data are nowadays available on the mechanical properties of sintered porous silicon. In this work we propose a finite element model to estimate the mechanical properties of sintered meso-porous silicon. The model has been employed to study the dependence of the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus (upper and lower bounds) on the porosity for porosities between 0% to 40%. Interpolation functions for the Young’s modulus and shear modulus have been obtained, and the results show good agreement with the data reported for other porous media. A Monte Carlo simulation has also been employed to study the effect of the actual microstructure on the mechanical properties.

                Keywords

                Porous silicon Homogenization Irregular microstructure Finite element method

                Background

                Porous silicon (PSi) has been extensively employed in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology and it has been proposed for some applications in photovoltaics (PV) technology. In MEMS technology, processes to manufacture suspended structures often employ open-porosity PSi as a sacrificial layer while in PV technology, stacked layers of sintered PSi with different porosity have been proposed both as buried Bragg reflectors and for layer transfer techniques for the fabrication of thin silicon solar cells[1]. In these applications, an accurate evaluation of PSi mechanical properties is paramount for the device fabrication and performance.

                Since its discovery, PSi has been investigated mostly for its optical and electrical properties. Only few researchers investigated the mechanical properties of this material. Characterizations of PSi mechanical properties were performed employing very different techniques, e.g., nanoindentation[2], Brillouin scattering[3], phase velocity scanning[4], and microechography[5], but each of these works dealt with open-porosity PSi.

                For some applications such as the layer transfer technique and the buried Bragg reflectors, as-anodized PSi undergoes a thermal treatment which transforms the structure of the silicon layer. When annealed at temperatures higher than 1,000°C, PSi experiences a structural reorganization driven by surface energy minimization which transforms the columnar voids formed by the anodization into closed sphere-like pores. The pores interact and give rise to more complex structures (see Figure1). To the knowledge of the authors, no studies have been performed about the mechanical properties of the sintered meso-porous silicon. Magoariec and Danescu[6] proposed a numerical model for evaluating the mechanical properties of sintered nano-PSi which they compared with experimental data from literature, but they did not take into account the effect of the random distribution of voids. Li et al.[7] showed that the mechanical properties of porous media depend on the connectivity of the pores and, thus, the actual distribution of voids is expected to play a role in the mechanical properties of porous silicon.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                Figure 1

                SEM picture of a sintered PSi cross section. SEM picture of sintered meso-PSi after 20 min annealing in H2 atmosphere at 1,100°C and 1 atm.

                In this work we present a finite element model for the evaluation of the overall mechanical properties of sintered PSi. This numerical model includes a random distribution of voids inside a representative volume element (RVE), and it has been exploited to evaluate the upper and lower bounds of the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus of PSi as a function of porosity. A Monte Carlo simulation is also presented in this work to evaluate the fluctuation of the upper bounds due to the statistical variation of the microstructure.

                Methods

                An example of the numerical model employed for the analysis of the mechanical properties of PSi is depicted in Figure2. The RVE is generated by subtracting a random distribution of spherical voids to a silicon cube. Without loss of generality, we assume that the edges of the cube are oriented along the <100> directions of the silicon crystal lattice. Referring to this orientation, the Young’s modulus, the Poisson ratio and the shear modulus of silicon employed in the analysis are the ones reported by Masolin et al.[8], i.e. ESi=130 GPa, νSi=0.278 and GSi=79.6 GPa. The position of the center of the voids and their radii follow a rectangular and a Gaussian distribution, respectively. Since the single void can be centered in any location in the silicon cube, there is a non-null probability that two or more voids overlap. The RVEs are then discretized by means of simplicial meshes.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                Figure 2

                Example of RVE. Example of RVE employed for the study of the overall mechanical properties of porous silicon and two cross-sections.

                To define the overall mechanical properties of PSi, the standard homogenization theory has been employed. In this framework, three different kinds of boundary conditions are usually applied: uniform displacements, uniform tractions, and periodic boundary conditions. If the considered RVE is sufficiently large, these boundary conditions lead to the same overall mechanical response, but such RVE is usually excessively large to be solved by numerical simulations. For smaller RVEs, uniform tractions and uniform displacements boundary conditions are known to evaluate respectively the upper and lower bounds of the stiffness matrix of the RVE, while periodic boundary conditions give a more reasonable estimation of the homogenized stiffness matrix. In this work we want to focus only on the values that bound the mechanical properties and, thus, periodic boundary conditions will not be taken into account.

                In the case of uniform displacement boundary conditions, displacements u i have been imposed at the boundaries (∂V) of the RVE (V ) by the relation:
                u i = E ij x j for x ∂V , http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Equa_HTML.gif

                where E ij are the components of the second order macroscopic strain tensor while, in case of uniform tractions boundary conditions, uniform surface loads have been applied at the boundary of the RVE. In the latter case, the components of the macroscopic strain tensor are computed from the average of the displacement field at the boundaries. Since the aspect ratio of the structures inside the RVE is limited and since, at room temperature, silicon behaves as a linear elastic material, nonlinear effects can be neglected until the stress field locally reaches the strength of silicon.

                The displacements and the loads imposed at the boundary induce a stress field inside the matrix that can be described by the second order microscopic stress tensor σ lm (x). The second order macroscopic stress tensor Σ lm is evaluated as the average of the microscopic stress field in the RVE:
                Σ lm = 1 V V σ lm ( x ) dV , http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Equb_HTML.gif

                where |V| denotes the volume of the RVE.

                Once the components of the macroscopic stress tensor are computed, the components of the fourth order stiffness tensor (S ijlm ) can be extracted by the appropriate ratio between E ij and Σ lm , following the relation:
                Σ lm = S lmij E ij . http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Equc_HTML.gif

                Since bulk silicon shows an orthotropic behavior with equivalent directions along < 100 >, a similar behavior is assumed for the RVE. By making this assumption, the equivalent Young’s modulus and shear modulus in the < 100 > directions can be computed. It has to be noted that the properties obtained by assuming an orthotropic material automatically degenerate in isotropic condition whenever the RVE is not anisotropic.

                To study the effect of the actual microstructure on the overall mechanical properties, a Monte Carlo simulation has been performed by generating different realizations with the same statistical distribution of pores positions and radii.

                Results and discussion

                Using the method presented in the previous section, the upper and the lower bounds of both the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus of 500×500×500 nm3 PSi cubes have been evaluated between 0% and 40% porosities. Evaluations of the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus obtained by this procedure and their interpolations are depicted respectively in Figures3 and4. The interpolation functions have the form A(Ψ)=ASi×(1−Ψ) k where A(Ψ) is the mechanical parameter as function of porosity Ψ, ASi is the mechanical parameter of the matrix, i.e. silicon, and k is the only fitting parameter that has to be tuned in the interpolation. This family of functions is commonly employed for the interpolation of mechanical properties of porous solids[9] and, in this work, they have been employed both for the upper bounds (UBs) and the lower bounds (LBs). The interpolating functions and the relative R2 values obtained for the Young’s modulus are as follows:
                E UB ( Ψ ) = E Si × ( 1 Ψ ) 1 . 58504 R 2 = 0 . 9988 E LB ( Ψ ) = E Si × ( 1 Ψ ) 2 . 47781 R 2 = 0 . 9894 , http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Equd_HTML.gif
                while for the shear modulus,
                G UB ( Ψ ) = G Si × ( 1 Ψ ) 1 . 77023 R 2 = 0 . 9988 G LB ( Ψ ) = G Si × ( 1 Ψ ) 2 . 96941 R 2 = 0 . 9922 . http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Eque_HTML.gif
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                Figure 3

                PSi Young’s modulus as function of porosity. Numerical results for uniform displacements (empty squares) and uniform traction (full squares) conditions and interpolations (solid line) representing the upper and lower bounds of the homogenized Young’s modulus as function of porosity. Curves are always underneath the Voigt theoretical upper bound (dashed line).

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                Figure 4

                PSi shear modulus as function of porosity. Numerical results for uniform displacements (empty squares) and uniform traction (full squares) conditions and interpolations (solid line) representing the upper and lower bounds of the homogenized shear modulus as function of porosity. Curves are always underneath the Voigt theoretical upper bound (dashed line).

                As the R2values suggest, these functions fit well the mechanical properties obtained by the simulations.

                The computed values are compared with the Voigt bound that is known to define the theoretical upper bound for the elastic moduli, while the Reuss lower bound is neglected since it is trivially null. As expected from the homogenization theory, the values gathered from simulations are between the theoretical bounds.

                In Figure5, the degree of anisotropy computed as G ( Ψ ) 2 ( 1 + ν ( Ψ ) ) E ( Ψ ) http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_IEq1_HTML.gif, i.e., the ratio between the computed shear modulus and the one evaluated by accounting silicon as an isotropic material is reported for both the upper bound and the lower bound. Even though the degree of anisotropy tends to the unity and, therefore, to the isotropic behavior, sintered PSi still behaves as an orthotropic material also for relatively high porosities.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig5_HTML.jpg
                Figure 5

                PSi degree of anisotropy as function of porosity. Degree of anisotropy computed as G ( Ψ ) 2 ( 1 + ν ( Ψ ) ) E ( Ψ ) http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_IEq2_HTML.gif for both the upper and lower bounds as function of porosity.

                Since each realization of the Monte Carlo simulation is generated by keeping constant the statistical distribution of the pores radii and positions, the porosity cannot be also fixed. An a-posteriori analysis reveals that the porosity ranges between 15% and 20% with a mean value of 17.66%. Figure6 shows the statistics of the upper bound of both the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus. Within the legend, the mean values and the variances are reported. To discern the effect of the actual pores distribution from the random change of porosity, the correlation coefficients (r and r ) between the logarithm of the two moduli and the logarithm of (1−Ψ) have been computed. Both the correlation coefficients (r =0.9485 and r =0.9773) report a strong correlation between the porosity and the moduli. This suggests that, once the statistical pores distribution is fixed, the actual microstructure has secondary effect compared to small variations of porosity.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-7-597/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1160_Fig6_HTML.jpg
                Figure 6

                Statistical distribution of PSi Young’s modulus and shear modulus. Statistical distribution of PSi Young’s modulus (left) and shear modulus (right) obtained by Monte Carlo simulations. The mean value and the standard deviation are reported in the legend.

                Conclusions

                In this work we presented a finite element model to evaluate the overall mechanical properties of sintered meso-PSi. This model has been employed to characterize the upper and lower bound of the Young’s modulus and shear modulus for meso-PSi with porosity between 0% and 40%. The values defined by the simulations can be fitted by interpolation functions that are commonly employed for porous media. This analysis reduces the theoretical bounds on the mechanical properties defined by the Voigt and Reuss limits and provides an indication on the possible Young’s modulus and shear modulus of sintered PSi as function of porosity. The values of Young’s modulus and shear modulus obtained by simulations are well fitted by interpolation functions that have been already employed for other porous media. This suggests that the model could represent well the actual properties of sintered PSi.

                Monte Carlo simulations have also been employed to analyze the effect of the actual microstructure on the upper bound for porosities between 15% and 20%. The results show that the large spread on the values of the Young’s modulus and shear modulus is mainly due to the variation of the porosity instead of the variation of the actual microstructure itself.

                The obtained values can be employed for the optimization of structures which involve sintered PSi, and the model can be exploited to study sintered PSi with different pores distributions.

                Authors’ information

                RM is PhD student at KU Leuven. VD is a research engineer in thin-film silicon solar cells at IMEC. MG is a research engineer in packaging reliability at IMEC. KV is a research engineer in packaging reliability at IMEC. KVN is a research engineer in thin-film silicon solar cells at IMEC. IG is a senior researcher at IMEC. JP is a professor at ESAT Department of KU Leuven and the photovoltaics program director at IMEC.

                Declarations

                Authors’ Affiliations

                (1)
                Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven
                (2)
                Interuniversitair Micro-Electronica Centrum (IMEC)

                References

                1. Brendel R: Thin-film crystalline silicon mini-modules using porous Si for layer transfer. Sol Energy 2004, 77(6):969–982. 10.1016/j.solener.2004.08.011View Article
                2. Bellet D, Lamagnere P, Vincent A, Brechet Y: Nanoindentation investigation of the Young’s modulus of porous silicon. J Appl Phys 1996, 80(7):3772–3776. 10.1063/1.363305View Article
                3. Andrews GT, Zuk J, Kiefte H, Clouter MJ, Nossarzewska-Orlowska E: Elastic characterization of a supported porous silicon layer by Brillouin scattering. Appl Phys Lett 1996, 69(9):1217–1219. 10.1063/1.117416View Article
                4. Cho H, Sato H, Nishino H, Tsukahara Y, Inaba M, Sato A, Takemoto M, Nakano S, Yamanaka K: Nondestructive evaluation of elastic properties in porous silicon film on Si(100) by the phase velocity scanning of laser interference fringes. In Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Volume 1: November 7–10 1995, Cannes. IEEE Xplore, Piscataway; 1995:757–760.View Article
                5. Fonseca RJM, Saurel JM, Foucaran A, Camassel J, Massone E, Taliercio T, Boumaiza Y: Acoustic investigation of porous silicon layers. J Mater Sci 1995, 30: 35–39. 10.1007/BF00352128View Article
                6. Magoariec H, Danescu A: Modeling macroscopic elasticity of porous silicon. Phys Status Solidi (C) 2009, 6(7):1680–1684. 10.1002/pssc.200881053View Article
                7. Li H, Lin Y, Tsui TY, Vlassak JJ: The effect of porogen loading on the stiffness and fracture energy of brittle organosilicates. J Mater Res 2009, 24: 107–116. 10.1557/JMR.2009.0005View Article
                8. Masolin A, Bouchard PO, Martini R, Bernacki M: Thermo-mechanical and fracture properties in single-crystal silicon. J Mater Sci 2012. 10.1007/s10853-012-6713-7
                9. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1997.View Article

                Copyright

                © Martini et al.; licensee Springer. 2012

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.