Open Access

In situ wet-cell TEM observation of gold nanoparticle motion in an aqueous solution

Nanoscale Research Letters20127:598

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-598

Received: 30 August 2012

Accepted: 16 October 2012

Published: 29 October 2012


In situ wet-cell transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technology enables direct observation of nanomaterials in a fully hydrated environment with high spatial and temporal resolution, which can be used to address a wide range of scientific problems. In this paper, the motions of approximately 5-nm sized gold nanoparticles in an aqueous solution are studied using the wet-cell TEM technology. It is observed that gold nanoparticles can be either in a single particle or cluster forms, and dynamic displacement and rotation motions are observed for both forms in the solution. Under electron beam irradiation, nanoparticles in some clusters gradually fused together; sometimes they also showed dramatic growth behavior. Mechanisms for the motion and growth of the particles/clusters are discussed.


In situ transmission electron microscopy Gold Nanoparticles Wet cell


Nanoparticle assemblies are often achieved involving liquids. Real-time observation of nanoparticle assembly and dynamics is thus of great importance[1, 2]. In situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques provide a local probe of structure and dynamics that other techniques cannot observe readily. In situ observation provides dynamic information about nanosystems, which is difficult to obtain by other techniques. Conventional TEM requires drying of samples in order to be compatible with vacuum. The structural features of the sample can change significantly during the process. Thus, for samples prepared in liquids, it would be ideal if it can be observed directly with TEM. With the development of robust silicon nitride (Si3N4) membrane windows for the in situ cell[3], the construction of wet-cell and in situ observation of liquids becomes readily possible inside TEM. Applications using the wet-cell technology are upsurging, and further exciting development is expected in the future[1]. For examples, this technique has been applied to the observation of electrochemical dynamic procedure of Cu[3] and Ni[4] nanoclusters, electron beam-induced growth of Pt[5] and lead sulfide nanocrystals[6] in liquid, semiconductor nanorod embedded in liquid crystal cells for optoelectronic applications[7], Al2O3 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes in water[8], and biological cells[9]. Earlier liquid cell TEM reactor yielded a spatial resolution of only 5nm, but recent development has improved the resolution to the sub-nanometer range[5]. The development in Berkeley using graphene sheet to replace Si3N4 even pushed the wet-cell TEM imaging resolution to the atomic level[10].

Zheng et al. recently made an analysis on gold nanoparticle diffusion during liquid evaporation[11]. In addition, Grogan and Bau reported observation with in situ STEM on gold clusters in an aqueous solution using a lower electron beam energy of 20 keV to test the liquid cell hermeticity. However, the image resolution is poorer due to the lower electron energy[12].

High spatial resolution TEM requires both high voltage and relatively high electron beam flux. Local heating and structural transformations may occur during observation due to the electron beam irradiation[13]. Previous reports have shown that electron beam can initiate nanoparticle nucleation and growth in a liquid[5]. Such beam effect needs to be carefully addressed in wet-cell TEM experiments.

In this paper, we report an in situ observation of gold nanoparticles in aqueous water solution using the wet-cell TEM technology. Sub-nanometer resolution images were obtained. Dynamic motion and dramatic growth of clusters of gold nanoparticles have been observed. These observations allow a discussion of electron beam effect on the growth of nanoparticle clusters.


Gold nanoparticles are studied with an O-ring sealed clamp on wet-cell developed earlier at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign[8]. As shown in Figure1, the cell utilizes two Si3N4 window grids to confine the liquid. The cell seals via three O-rings that couple the grids and the top and bottom pieces of the enclosure together. The design utilizes commercial silicon nitride grids as the substrates and a fixed reusable cell, which is simply assembled with O-rings and screws, limiting the need for complex microfabrication procedures to generate appropriate windows for each experiment. Once the grids are put in place and the liquid is loaded, the cell can be completely assembled within few minutes. Gold nanoparticles (5 nm in diameter) dispersed in DI water (Nanocs Inc., New York, USA, GNP0001-5 (20 ml 0.01% Au)) were tested in situ in TEM chamber. Si3N4 window grids (50-nm thick) from Ted Pella, Inc. (CA, USA) were used to sandwich the liquid in between. A JEOL 2010 LaB6 TEM system (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used for the observation, which operated with a 200-kV electron acceleration voltage.
Figure 1

A schematic of the wet-cell for in situ TEM analysis.

Results and discussion

Figure2 shows a cluster of gold nanoparticles observed in an aqueous solution sealed with the wet-cell. The roughened particle shapes indicate that they are faceted nanocrystals. Diffraction contrast fringes can be seen in individual particles, confirming the crystalline structure of the particles. The spatial resolution of the images is about 0.5 nm. Panels a, b, c, and d of Figure2 were obtained at 0, 2, 3, and 4 min, respectively. The particles are located at relatively fixed locations with time, without showing Brownian motion, suggesting they might be attached on the silicon nitride window without being able to freely move in the liquid. Changes in the particle morphology occurred over time. In the figure, arrow 1 points to locations where particles coalesce with time. Arrow 2 points to an overlap region with darker contrast due to 3D arrangement of the nanoparticles. From Figure2a,b,c, we see that overlapped region is reducing in size with time, suggesting that the two particles are in different planes and are moving apart from each other. Arrow 3 points to the bottom contour of the moving down particle. From Figure2a,b,c, we see that the contour is changing shape with time from a flat bottom line to a relatively rounder one, suggesting the particle was rotating as it moves down.
Figure 2

Wet-cell TEM observation of gold nanoparticle motion in water. (a) 0, (b) 2, (c) 3, and (d) 4 min. Arrow 1, particles move together and merge; 2, particles move apart so the overlapped dark area becomes smaller; 3, the particle bottom become rounder, suggesting that the particle might be rotating.

The above changes in the gold particles do not have to happen in a liquid. When we put gold nanoparticles on a dry Si3N4 grid, similar behavior was observed. It has also been reported earlier in TEM analysis that for nanoparticles, coalescing, attachment, rotation, and agglomeration on a dry substrate can happen at temperatures much lower than the melting temperature of a bulk material[14]. For verification of the particle dynamics in solution, further observations were made. As shown in Figure3, constant motions of gold particles and clusters in the fluid were seen. Panels a, b, and c of Figure3 were taken at 0, 2, and 3 min, respectively. We see that the gold cluster in the middle changes angle with time, and there are individual dots that are moving constantly. The center cluster and the individual dots are not in the same depth in the cell. The cluster has a point fixed on the grid and thus can only rotate with time, but not move in location. By adjusting the focus of the TEM, we found that the individual dots are at a different focus depth and thus should be deeper in the liquid. Eight dots are labeled out which we used to track the motion with time. From the figure, we see the dots are moving around while changing relative positions to each other with time. Dots 3 and 4 are moving apart with time, while dots 7 and 8 moved together. Dot 3 is changing shape because it is a two-particle cluster (see inset of Figure3b) which is rotating while moving in the liquid. The actual motions of the particles and clusters in the wet-cell are more dramatic than we directly saw in the figure. The big cluster was observed to frequently change angle with time and rotate from one end to the other (approximately 30°) within a fraction of a second; there are also particles and clusters that move much faster than the eight labeled dots. The fact that the big cluster can rotate quickly suggests that the individual dots could also move much quicker if freely suspend in the liquid. The moderate displacement observed on these dots suggests that they might have been slowed down due to the interaction from the silicon nitride window. Actually, when we adjust focus on these dots, we found that they are on about the same focus plane, supporting that they should be close to a window plane instead of freely suspended in different depths in the liquid. It has been estimated by White et al.[15] that, for Brownian motion of 4-nm diameter particles in water, a mean square displacement <x2>1/2 of approximately 10 μm is expected within a 1/3s drift time, which is much larger than a regular TEM imaging width. Thus, the fact that the particles remain visible for more than one frame during the TEM observation indicates that the Brownian motion is greatly suppressed by the interaction such as that from the window. The observation shown in Figure2 can be viewed as an extreme case. When the particles are tightly attached to a window, their motion in the liquid almost stopped.
Figure 3

A gold cluster rotating in liquid, with particles roaming randomly in the background. (a) 0, (b) 2, and (c) 3 min;(d) Magnification of partial of the cluster from (a), (b), and (c). Inset of (b) is an image focusing on the background particles, showing 3 is a two particle cluster.

Figure3d is the enlargement of one section of the center cluster, in which we see individual gold nanoparticles in the cluster are merging with time, confirming that the particle agglomeration behavior is happening in the liquid environment. The cluster looks like individual beads that are attached to each other in the beginning but became more like a web made up of nanowires after 3 min of electron beam irradiation. It is significant that no bubbling in the liquid is seen during the observation, which indicates that the welding procedure is happening even below the boiling temperature of water. It has been calculated that the temperature change in a wet-cell under electron beam irradiation is generally much smaller than 1 K[15]. Dramatic changes in gold nanoparticles such as dissolution had been previously observed under relatively high electron doses of 8 × 105 e/nm2[16]. In our experiment, with the longer observation time of several minutes, the electron dose may accumulate to beyond a limit that affects the observable gold crystal morphology.

A more dramatic shape change in gold nanoparticle cluster is recorded as shown in Figure4. The inset of Figure4a shows a six-particle cluster during image adjustment. A bubble has been seen nearby, confirming the cluster is submerged in the liquid. Similar to Figure2, this cluster is relatively fixed to a location, without making quick rotations or floating around to large distances. However, in Figure4a, we see that after the image adjustment, the particles not only fully merged together, but also changed shape significantly, with some short nanowires growing up in between. Figure4b,c,d shows that as time passes (3, 8, and 12 min), the cluster continues to grow up. Arrow 1 points to locations where new branches grow out from the cluster. Arrow 2 points to where the nanowire bends during growth. Arrow 3 points to the tip of the cluster which becomes blurred with time; this could be due to the bending of the nanocluster into the liquid, thus moving out of the focus of the microscope.
Figure 4

A nanocluster that grows dramatically in size with time (a) 0, (b) 3, (c) 8, and (d) 12 min: Arrow 1, new branches grow out; 2, nanowire in the middle of the cluster bends up and grows longer; 3, a branch on the nanocluster became less clear due to motion in the water or drifting into different depth of the liquid. Inset of (a) is the nanocluster micrograph that was taken before image adjustment.

Although a longer beam exposure time (12 min in Figure4 vs. 3 to 4 min in Figures2 and3) can be used to partially explain such a dramatic shape change, it is unusual to see that the cluster increases in size greatly with time. Chemical reactions could have occurred that transported materials into the cluster from regions away from the electron beam. Although a noble metal, gold can form many diverse compounds. One possibility is that gold reacted with water under the high energy electron bombardment and formed gold oxide or gold hydroxide; however, this growth mechanism is not fully sustainable. After all gold atoms in the cluster are oxidized, the volume increase will stop. As the cluster in Figure4 is fixed in location without being able to move freely around in the liquid, it must be closely attached to the silicon nitride window, and wetting of the gold on the window might also account for the morphology change. Arrow 4 in Figure4d points to a black line in the growing cluster, suggesting a trace for material migration during the growth. Compared with Figure4c, it appears that the round dark region near the top center (region 5 in Figure4d) is the source region for the mass redistribution, and the growing branches to the left are the regions where the materials are transported toward. The nanowires are in much lighter color in these TEM bright field images than the earlier gold particles, suggesting that they are much thinner, thus results in a relatively large area increase. This supports the idea that the gold wets the window under electron beam irradiation. In comparison, we irradiated gold nanoclusters on a dry grid for the same amount of time. Besides the simpler merging behavior like in Figure2, no such dramatic growth behavior was observed, suggesting that water might have played a role in helping catalyze the nanowire growth. Recently, Zheng et al. reported in situ TEM observation of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution[17], in which Pt3Fe nanoparticles attach and coalesce into nanoparticle chains. The chains were winding and markedly flexible, and gradually turned into nanowires through mass redistribution procedure. Most of the nanowires remain polystalline and twisted for an extended period of time. Yuk et al.[10] further reported in situ TEM observation of Pt nanoparticles coalescing in liquid. These observations are similar to our results here. It is not fully excluded that there is the possibility that gold dissolution happened somewhere in the liquid, which got redeposited onto the growing cluster under the beam interaction. Further study on the gold morphology change under electron beam irradiation in solution is still needed.


In summary, we report the observation of gold nanoparticles in water solution using in situ wet-cell TEM technology. The gold nanoparticle system showed a variety of dynamic behaviors in the aqueous solution involving single particles, particle clusters, and nanowires, which include dynamic displacement and rotation motions, fusion of particles, and even dramatic size growth behavior under the electron beam. The fusion and dramatic growth of the particles happened at temperatures much lower than the gold melting temperature. Random motions of the gold particles and clusters are greatly suppressed by the drag from the silicon nitride windows.

Authors' information

XC is currently a professor at the School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China. JW is a materials scientist at Electron Microscopy Center and Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA



The TEM experiment was carried out in part in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Facilities, University of Illinois, which are partially supported by the US Department of Energy under grants DE-FG02-07ER46453 and DE-FG02-07ER46471. The authors thank SJ Dillon, JM Zuo, CH Lei, W Swiech, and B Sankaran for the kind support, and Dr. L Martin for the valuable discussions. The support from Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (B502), Shanghai Key Laboratory Project (08DZ2230500), and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Project (11nm0507000) is highly acknowledged. The research was partially accomplished at the Electron Microscopy Center at Argonne National Laboratory, a US Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory operated under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357 by UChicago Argonne, LLC.

Authors’ Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymeric Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Electron Microscopy Center and Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory


  1. de Jonge N, Ross FM: Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotech 2011, 6: 695. 10.1038/nnano.2011.161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tao F, Salmeron M: In situ studies of chemistry and structure of materials in reactive environments. Science 2011, 331: 171. 10.1126/science.1197461View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Williamson MJ, Tromp RM, Vereecken PM, Hull R, Ross FM: Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface. Nat Mater 2003, 2: 532. 10.1038/nmat944View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Noh KW, Wen JG, Dillon S: In situ electrochemical wet cell transmission electron microscopy characterization of solid–liquid interactions between Ni and aqueous NiCl2. Acta Mater 2012, 60: 192. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zheng HM, Smith RK, Jun YW, Kisielowski C, Dahmen U, Alivisatos AP: Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science 2009, 324: 1309. 10.1126/science.1172104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans JE, Jungjohann KL, Browning ND, Arslan I: Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 2809. 10.1021/nl201166kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wu KJ, Chu KC, Chao CY, Chen YF, Lai CW, Kang CC, Chen CY, Chou PT: CdS nanorods imbedded in liquid crystal cells for smart optoelectronic devices. Nano Lett 2007, 7(7):1908. 10.1021/nl070541nView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks R, Morefield S, Wen JG, Liao DX, Alvarado J, Strano M, Marsh C: A study of nanomaterial dispersion in solution by wet-cell transmission electron microscopy. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2008, 8(9):4404. 10.1166/jnn.2008.306View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. de Jonge N, Peckys DB, Kremers GJ, Piston DW: Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009, 106: 2159. 10.1073/pnas.0809567106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yuk JM, Park J, Ercrius P, Kim K, Hellebusch DJ, Crommie MF, Lee JY, Zettl A, Alivisatos AP: High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science 2012, 336: 61. 10.1126/science.1217654View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zheng HM, Claridge SA, Minor AM, Alivisatos AP, Dahmen U: Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 2009, 9(6):2460. 10.1021/nl9012369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Grogan JM, Bau HH: The nanoaquarium: a platform for in situ transmission electron microscopy in liquid media. J Microelectromech Syst 2010, 19: 885.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Young NP, van Huis MA, Zandbergen HW, Xu H, Kirkland AI: Transformations of gold nanoparticles investigated using variable temperature high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110: 506. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.12.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. van Huis MA, Kunneman LT, Overgaag K, Xu Q, Pandraud G, Zandergen HW, Vanmaekelbergh D: Low-temperature nanocrystal unification through rotations and relaxations probed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 2008, 8(11):3959. 10.1021/nl8024467View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. White ER, Mecklenburg M, Shevitski B, Singer SB, Regan BC: Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir 2012, 28: 3695. 10.1021/la2048486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. de Jonge N, Poirier-Demers N, Demers H, Peckys DB, Drouin D: Nanometer-resolution electron microscopy through micrometer-thick water layers. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110: 1114. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao HG, Cui LK, Whitelam S, Zheng HM: Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science 2012, 336: 1011. 10.1126/science.1219185View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Chen and Wen; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.