Open Access

Photodeposition of Ag2S on TiO2 nanorod arrays for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells

Nanoscale Research Letters20138:10

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-10

Received: 5 November 2012

Accepted: 27 December 2012

Published: 3 January 2013


Ag2S quantum dots were deposited on the surface of TiO2 nanorod arrays by a two-step photodeposition. The prepared TiO2 nanorod arrays as well as the Ag2S deposited electrodes were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and transmission electron microscope, suggesting a large coverage of Ag2S quantum dots on the ordered TiO2 nanorod arrays. UV–vis absorption spectra of Ag2S deposited electrodes show a broad absorption range of the visible light. The quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) based on these electrodes were fabricated, and the photoelectrochemical properties were examined. A high photocurrent density of 10.25 mA/cm2 with a conversion efficiency of 0.98% at AM 1.5 solar light of 100 mW/cm2 was obtained with an optimal photodeposition time. The performance of the QDSSC at different incident light intensities was also investigated. The results display a better performance at a lower incident light level with a conversion efficiency of 1.25% at 47 mW/cm2.


Ag2S Quantum dot-sensitized solar cell Photodeposition TiO2 nanorod


Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) have attracted increasing attention due to their relatively low cost and potentials to construct high-efficiency energy conversion systems [1]. Compared with organic dyes used in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), semiconductor sensitizers in the form of quantum dots (QDs) present higher extinction coefficients and adjustable absorption spectra by controlling their size [2, 3]. However, the best efficiency (approximately 5%) reached by QDSSCs is much lower than that of conventional DSSCs [4, 5]. The deposition of QD sensitizers on the electron acceptor (e.g., TiO2) related to the loading amount and the connection between QDs and electron acceptor plays a key role in the QDSSC performance. QDs with various sizes should be deposited on the surface of mesoporous TiO2 separately as a requirement for efficient charge separation [6]. Typically, the coverage of mesoporous TiO2 by QDs is much less than a full monolayer [6, 7], which leads to insufficient light harvesting and back electron transfer from exposed TiO2 to electrolyte. Besides, deposition of typically 3 to 8 nm diameter QDs into mesoporous TiO2 with relative narrow pores is rather difficult, and large QDs that inserted into mesoporous TiO2 may also cause pore blocking and subsequently inhibit the penetration of electrolyte deep into the holes [8]. The efficiency enhancement of QDSSCs could be achieved by applying an advanced deposition method as well as suitable TiO2 nanostructure. For the former, several deposition methods have been developed to anchor QDs on the surface of TiO2 including ex-situ and in-situ methods [6], where photodeposition is a promising candidate by taking advantage of the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 in the deposition process [911]. Photoreduction on the surface of TiO2 leads to a large and uniform coverage of QDs and intimate contact between the QDs and TiO2 for efficient interfacial charge transfer [11]. For the latter, one-dimensional oriented arrays (nanotube or nanorod arrays) possess large surface area and efficient electron transfer property that can be employed to improve the performance of QDSSCs [12, 13]. Importantly, the high-oriented arrays provide uniform pore size that is favorable for QD anchoring with rare pore blocking.

Ag2S is an important photoelectric material and has a broad application in terms of photocatalysis and electronic devices [1417]. With bulk bandgap of 1.0 eV, close to the optimal bandgap of 1.1 to 1.4 eV for photovoltaic devices [18], Ag2S is a potential sensitizer superior to others used in QDSSCs. Several researches that concentrated on the Ag2S-QDSSCs have been reported since the first application of Ag2S in QDSSCs [1923]. However, the reported conversion efficiency (η) remains lower than that of QDSSCs based on other narrow bandgap semiconductor (e.g., CdS and CdSe) [24, 25], which is partly attributed to the low coverage of Ag2S on the surface of TiO2.

To improve the efficiency of Ag2S-QDSSCs, we apply a modified photodeposition as well as an oriented TiO2 nanorod array (NRA) on the cell. Typically, the oriented TiO2 NRA was prepared by a simple hydrothermal method. Photodeposition of Ag2S was conducted by two steps: photoreduction of Ag+ to Ag by TiO2 NRA followed by the sulfurization of Ag to Ag2S QDs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Ag2S QD-sensitized TiO2 NRA solar cells. Results show that a large coverage of Ag2S QDs on the TiO2 NRs has been achieved by this modified photodeposition, and the photoelectrochemical properties of these electrodes suggest that Ag2S has a great potential for the improvement of QDSSCs.


Growth of TiO2 NRA

TiO2 NRA was grown on the fluorine-doped SnO2-coated conducting glass (FTO) substrate (resistance 25 Ω/square, transmittance 85%) by a hydrothermal method as described in the literature [26]. Briefly, 30 mL deionized water was mixed with 30 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid (36.5% to 38.0% by weight). The mixture was stirred for 5 min followed by an addition of 1 mL titanium butoxide (98%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). After stirring for another 5 min, the mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave of 100-mL volume. The FTO substrate was placed at an angle against the wall of the Teflonliner with the conducting side facing down. After a hydrothermal treatment at 150°C for 20 h, the substrate was taken out and immersed in 40 mM TiCl4 aqueous solution for 30 min at 70°C. The TiCl4-treated sample was annealed at 450°C for 30 min.

Photodeposition of Ag2S on TiO2 NRA

As illustrated in Figure 1, the photodeposition procedure was conducted in two steps. Firstly, the as-prepared TiO2 NRA was immersed into the ethanol solution containing Ag+. The solution was prepared by dissolving 0.2 g polyvinylpyrrolidone (K90, MW = 1,300,000, Aladdin Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in 20 mL pure ethanol, followed by adding 0.2 mL of AgNO3 aqueous solution (0.1 M) dropwise. Irradiation was carried out from the direction of TiO2 film with a high-intensity mercury lamp for a given period. After irradiation, the substrate was taken out, washed with ethanol, and transferred into methanol solution consisting 1 M Na2S and 2 M S. The sulfurization reaction was conducted at 50°C for 8 h. Finally, the photoanodes were passivated with ZnS by dipping into 0.1 M Zn(CH3COO)2 and 0.1 M Na2S aqueous solution for 1 min alternately.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the deposition of Ag 2 S on TiO 2 NRA. (i) Photoreduction of Ag+ to Ag; (ii) sulfurization.

Solar cell assembly

The counter electrode was prepared by dripping a drop of 10 mM H2PtCl6 (99.99%, Aldrich Company, Inc., Wyoming, USA) ethanol solution onto FTO substrate, followed by heating at 450°C for 15 min. Ag2S-sensitized TiO2 nanorod (NR) photoanode and Pt counter electrode were assembled into sandwichstructure using a sheet of a thermoplastic frame (25-μm thick; Surlyn, DuPont, Wilmington, USA) as spacer between the two electrodes. The polysulfide electrolyte consisted of 0.5 M Na2S, 2 M S, 0.2 M KCl, and 0.5 M NaOH in methanol/water (7:3 v/v). An opaque mask with an aperture was coated on the cell to ensure the illuminated area of 0.16 cm2.


X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out using a RAD-3X (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation. The morphology of the films was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, S4800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Beijing, China). To prepare the TEM sample, TiO2 NRs together with Ag2S QDs were scratched from the FTO substrate and dispersed in ethanol by sonication. The UV–vis absorption spectra of TiO2 NRA and Ag2S-deposited TiO2 NRA were recorded in the range from 350 to 800 nm using a Hitachi U-3010 spectroscopy. The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of solar cells were examined by a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, USA) under illumination by a solar simulator (AM 1.5 G). Incident light intensity was calibrated by standard silicon solar cell and light intensity meter (FZ-Aradiometer) simultaneously. The stability of the solar cell was measured by electrochemical workstation (pp211; Zahner, Elektrik GmbH & Co.KG, Kronach, Germany) with continuous illumination on the solar cell.

Results and discussion

Morphology of the TiO2 NRA

Figure 2 shows the FESEM images of TiO2 NRA grown on the FTO substrate (FTO/TiO2) viewed from top (a) and cross-section (b). The TiO2 film is composed of separate NRs with consistent orientation, forming a uniform array that covered the entire surface of the substrate. The top view of FTO/TiO2 shows that the top surface of NRs contains many step edges facilitating further growth. The NRs are tetragonal in shape with square top facets, consistent with the growth habit of tetragonal crystal structure. The average side length of the top squares is 200 nm, and the space between them is about the same size. The cross-section view of FTO/TiO2 shows that the NRs are 2 to 3 μm in length with smooth sides. At the bottom of the TiO2 NRA, a thin layer composed of short disordered NRs adhering to the FTO substrate is found. The compact layer may reduce the recombination of electron from the FTO to the electrolyte in the working course of QDSSCs by segregating them.
Figure 2

FESEM images of TiO 2 NRA. Top (a) and cross-sectional views (b).

Photodeposition of Ag2S QDs

The photodeposition of Ag2S QDs was conducted by two separate processes: photoreduction of Ag+ to Ag and sulfurization of Ag to Ag2S. Photocatalytic properties of TiO2 play an essential role in the reduction of Ag+. The mechanism of TiO2 photocatalytic-reduction metal ions was described in the literature [27]. The main reaction processes of photoreduction Ag+ are as follows (reactions 1 to 4): (1) Typically, TiO2 surface exhibits strong adsorptivity for Ag+, and the adsorption equilibrium is reached soon after immersing FTO/TiO2 in Ag+ ethanol solution in the dark. (2) UV irradiation (λ < 400 nm) excites TiO2 to generate electron–hole pairs. (3) The electrons reduce the Ag+ adsorbed preferentially on the surface to Ag, (4) while the holes are irreversibly scavenged by ethanol. Continuous reduction of Ag+ can produce Ag nucleates on the surface of TiO2 forming a Schottky junction between them. The charge-separation generated electrons are partially transferred to the Ag clusters from TiO2[28]. Oxidation and reduction processes are carried on at the surface of TiO2 and Ag, respectively, as illustrated in Figure 3. Consequently, the reduction on the surface of Ag enables the crystal nucleus to grow up. After the photoreduction, the sulfurization reaction of Ag clusters occurs spontaneously, owing to the low reaction Gibbs energy of −47.1 kJ/mol [29].
TiO 2 + Ag + TiO 2 Ag +
TiO 2 + hv TiO 2 e + h +
e + Ag + Ag
h + + C 2 H 5 OH C 2 H 4 OH
Figure 3

Schematic illustration for charge separation between TiO 2 and Ag, and redox reaction on them.

Photoreduction rate of Ag+ by TiO2 in ethanol solution is so rapid that the electrode turned to silvery-white within 3 min after immersing FTO/TiO2 in the solution. To verify the effect of photocatalytic properties of TiO2 on the reduction process, the ethanol solution containing Ag+ was irradiated in the same condition but in the absence of TiO2, and no silver was observed in 10 h. Similar results were also observed when immersing FTO/TiO2 in the Ag+ solution in the dark, consistent with the proposed photoreduction mechanism.

Figure 4 shows XRD patterns of FTO/TiO2 (a), FTO/TiO2/Ag (b), and FTO/TiO2/Ag2S (c) electrodes. XRD patterns of FTO/TiO2 electrode reveal that the synthesized TiO2 NRs are tetragonal rutile structure (JCPDS card no. 21–1276). The enhanced (101) peak indicates the NRs are well-crystallized and grow in consistent orientation. In the XRD pattern of FTO/TiO2/Ag electrode (b), all peaks indexed as TiO2 crystal have been weakened while the outstanding diffraction peaks of silver (silver-3C, syn JCPDS card no. 04–0783) emerged. This proves the large coverage of crystallized Ag on the surface of TiO2 nanostructure as a result of the photoreduction process. As compared with curve b, the XRD pattern of FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrode shows five diffraction peaks which agreed well with acanthite Ag2S (JCPDS card no. 14–0072), suggesting a conversion of Ag to Ag2S. Additionally, the outstanding peaks of Ag in curve b are not observed in curve c which indicates that the reaction between Ag and S has been completed thoroughly.
Figure 4

XRD patterns. FTO/TiO2 (a), FTO/TiO2/Ag (b), and FTO/TiO2/Ag2S (c) electrodes.

Figure 5 displays a SEM image of a top view of FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrode with 10-min photoreduction (a) and a TEM image of single NR stripped from the FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrode (b). The two images clearly show that TiO2 NRs are coated by a layer of Ag2S crystallites not only on the top surface but also on the four side faces. The top view of FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrode shows that the small steps within the top face of TiO2 NR observed in SEM image of FTO/TiO2 electrode (Figure 2a) are invisible due to the coverage of Ag2S crystallites. The interval between NRs is reserved as well as the ordered TiO2 NRA structure. The TEM image (b) shows that the entire NR is coated with QDs from the bottom to the top. Most of the QDs that covered the surface of NR disperse well with an average diameter of 10 nm. A closer observation of the Ag2S QDs attached with TiO2 NR can be obtained by the high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) images (Figure 5c,d). The NR grows along the [001] direction, and lattice fringes with interplanar spacing d110 = 0.321 nm are clearly imaged. The Ag2S QDs anchoring on the side surface of TiO2 NR are composed of small crystallites as observed by the fringes which correspond to the (121) planes of Ag2S.
Figure 5

SEM, TEM, and HRTEM images. SEM image of FTO/TiO2/Ag2S (top view) (a), TEM image of a single TiO2 NR covered with Ag2S QDs (b), and HRTEM images of TiO2/Ag2S (c,d).

Optical and photoelectrochemical properties of Ag2S QDs-sensitized TiO2 NRA

Figure 6 shows the absorption spectra of FTO/TiO2 electrode and FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrodes with different photoreduction times (tp). The absorption edge around 400 nm is consistent with bandgap of rutile TiO2 (3.0 eV). While Ag2S QDs are deposited on TiO2 NRs, absorption spectra are successfully extended to visible wavelength. With tp increasing from 3 to 15 min, the absorption range changes from 400 to 520 nm until covering the entire visible spectrum; moreover, the absorbance obviously increases. The bandgap of bulk Ag2S is 1.0 eV. The redshift of absorption edge for FTO/TiO2/Ag2S electrodes with prolonged tp indicates the fact that the size of Ag2S QDs gradually increases, and the quantization effect of ultrasmall QDs gradually vanishes. The enhanced absorbance is due to the increased amount of deposited Ag2S QDs.
Figure 6

UV–vis absorption spectra of FTO/TiO 2 electrode (a) and FTO/TiO 2 /Ag 2 S electrodes with different photoreduction times (b, c, d, e).

Figure 7 shows J-V characteristics of solar cells fabricated with different photoanodes under AM 1.5 illumination at 100 mW/cm2. The photovoltaic properties of these cells are listed in Table 1. TiO2/Ag2S cell with tp = 3 min possesses a much higher Jsc and a decreased Voc compared with bare TiO2 solar cell. The increased Jsc value is attributed to the sensitization of TiO2 by Ag2S QDs, while the slightly decreased Voc value is mainly due to the band bending between Ag2S QDs and TiO2. With tp increasing from 3 to 10 min, the Jsc is promoted from 4.15 to 10.25 mA/cm2. The improved Jsc value is caused by an increasing loading amount of Ag2S QDs and a broaden absorption spectrum (as shown in Figure 6). Meanwhile, the Voc values are slightly improved, which is probably due to electron accumulation within TiO2 shifting the Fermi level to more negative potentials. The optimal solar cell performance is obtained with a η of 0.98% and a superior Jsc of 10.25 mA/cm2 when tp = 10 min. The Jsc value is much higher than those of other reported Ag2S QD sensitized solar cells even though they were prepared by a TiO2 nanoparticle matrix with a larger surface area. The enhancement in Jsc is a result of the synergy of larger QD loading amount and fine connection between QDs and TiO2. Compared with typical QDSSCs based on other narrow bandgap semiconductors (e.g., CdS and CdSe), the Voc values of Ag2S-QDSSCs are quite low which are almost equivalent to half of the others (CdS-QDSSCs, 0.6 to 0.7 V). Despite of the high Jsc values owing to a broad absorption spectrum, η is limited by the low Voc values. When tp was elongated to 15 min, η decreases sharply with a halving Jsc and a lower Fill factor (FF). This phenomenon is speculated to be caused by too long deposition time which results in excess Ag2S nanoparticles generated on TiO2 NRs, consequently decreases effective electron injection and increases recombination rate. The slightly reduced FF as tp increases also indicates that recombination rate rises with growing amount of loading Ag2S nanoparticles.
Figure 7

J - V characteristics of solar cells fabricated with different photoanodes under AM 1.5 illumination at 100 mW/cm 2 .

Table 1

Photovoltaic parameters of solar cells fabricated with different photoanodes under AM 1.5 illumination at 100 mW/cm 2

Solar cell

Jsc (mA/cm2)

Voc (V)



Bare TiO2





3 min





5 min





10 min





15 min





The J-V curves of a Ag2S QD-sensitized solar cell measured at three different light intensities are shown in Figure 8. The photovoltaic performance parameters are listed in Table 2. The η reaches a value of 1.25% at 47 mW/cm2 solar intensity. The Jsc value accumulates to 11.7 mA/cm2 as incident light intensity increases to 150 mW/cm2 (150% sun). However, Jsc produced by per unit light power is decreased by a factor of 40.9 compared with lower light level condition of 47% sun. This suggests that the incident light is not effectively converted into electricity at a higher photon density, which may be attributed to a lower rate of photon capture due to the insufficient QDs loading on TiO2 nanorods. By employing longer TiO2 NRs, the response of the photocurrent should be promoted to be linear with the incident light intensity, and a higher conversion efficiency should be reached at full sunlight.
Figure 8

J - V curves of Ag 2 S QD-sensitized solar cell measured at different light intensities.

Table 2

Photovoltaic parameters of Ag 2 S QD-sensitized solar cell measured at different light intensities

Pin (mW/cm2)

Jsc (mA/cm2)

Voc (V)























The photostability of Ag2S-QDSSC was measured by illuminating it at 100 mW/cm2 sunlight for 2 h and characterized by recording the Jsc and Voc of the device (Figure 9). During illumination, the Jsc remained relatively steady with a drop less than 5%, and the Voc fluctuated within 2%. This shows that the Ag2S QDs are robust in resisting photo corrosion in the presence of polysulfide electrolyte, and the small decline is probably caused by the loss of the solvent.
Figure 9

Photostability of Ag 2 S QD-sensitized solar cell under AM 1.5 illumination at 100 mW/cm 2 .


We have deposited Ag2S QDs on TiO2 NRA by a two-step photodeposition. The deposition process was conducted by photoreduction of Ag+ to Ag on the surface of TiO2 NRs followed by chemical reaction with sulfur. By controlling the photoreduction period, we have obtained Ag2S-sensitized TiO2 NRs with a large coverage and superior photoelectrochemical properties. QDSSCs based on the Ag2S-sensitized TiO2 NRAs were fabricated. Under optimal condition, the Ag2S-QDSSC yields a Jsc of 10.25 mA/cm2 with a conversion efficiency of 0.98% at AM 1.5 solar light of 100 mW/cm2. We also investigated the solar cell performance under varied incident light intensities. Results show that a drawback of these cells in full sun condition compared with the maximum efficiency achieved at lower light level. The key factor that limits the solar cell performance is the low Voc values we obtained. By employing suitable redox electrolyte, we believe the Ag2S-QDSSCs will have a great promotion with increased Voc values.



conversion efficiency


dye-sensitized solar cells


field emission scanning electron microscopy


fill factor


fluorine-doped SnO2-coated conducting glass


high resolution transmission electron microscope


short circuit current density




nanorod array


quantum dots


quantum dot-sensitized solar cells


scanning electron microscope


transmission electron microscope


photoreduction time


open voltage


X-ray diffraction.



This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 (2011AA050511), Jiangsu “333” Project, the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the Postgraduate Research Innovation Projects at Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (CXLX12_0707).

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Low-Dimensional Materials, Micro-nano Devices and System, Changzhou University
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Solar Cell Materials and Technology


  1. Kamat PV, Tvrdy K, Baker DR, Radich JG: Beyond photovoltaics: semiconductor nanoarchitectures for liquid-junction solar cells. Chem Rev 2010, 110: 6664–6688. 10.1021/cr100243pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Yu WW, Qu LH, Guo WZ, Peng XG: Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals. Chem Mater 2003, 15: 2854–2860. 10.1021/cm034081kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Brus L: Electronic wave functions in semiconductor clusters: experiment and theory. J Phys Chem 1986, 90: 2555–2560. 10.1021/j100403a003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Santra PK, Kamat PV: Mn-doped quantum dot sensitized solar cells: astrategy to boost efficiency over 5%. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134: 2508–2511. 10.1021/ja211224sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yella A, Lee HW, Tsao HN, Yi C, Chandiran AK, Nazeeruddin MK, Diau EWG, Yeh CY, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M: Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12% efficiency. Science 2011, 334: 629–634. 10.1126/science.1209688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ruhle S, Shalom M, Zaban A: Quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Chem Phys Chem 2010, 11: 2290–2304. 10.1002/cphc.201000069Google Scholar
  7. Guijarro N, Lana-Villarreal T, Mora-Seró I, Bisquert J, Gómez R: CdSe quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 electrodes: effect of quantum dot coverage and mode of attachment. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 4208–4214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang Q, Guo X, Huang X, Huang S, Li D, Luo Y, Shen Q, Toyoda T, Meng Q: Highly efficient CdS/CdSe-sensitized solar cells controlled by the structural properties of compact porous TiO2 photoelectrodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13: 4659–4667.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jin-nouchi Y, Naya S, Tada H: Quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell using a photoanode prepared by in situ photodeposition of CdS on nanocrystallineTiO2 films. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 16837–16842. 10.1021/jp1062226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujii M, Nagasuna K, Fujishima M, Akita T, Tada H: Photodeposition of CdS quantum dots on TiO2: preparation, characterization, and reaction mechanism. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 16711–16716. 10.1021/jp9056626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tada H, Fujishima M, Kobayashi H: Photodeposition of metal sulfide quantum dots on titanium (IV) dioxide and the applications to solar energy conversion. Chem Soc Rev 2011, 40: 4232–4243. 10.1039/c0cs00211aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sun WT, Yu Y, Pan HY, Gao XF, Chen Q, Peng LM: CdS quantum dots sensitized TiO2 nanotube-array photoelectrodes. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 1124–1125. 10.1021/ja0777741View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang H, Bai Y, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Li J, Guo L: CdS quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 nanorod array on transparent conductive glass photoelectrodes. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 16451–16455. 10.1021/jp104208zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Xie Y, Heo SH, Kim YN, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Synthesis and visible-light-induced catalytic activity of Ag2S-coupled TiO2 nanoparticles and nanowires. Nanotechnology 2010, 21: 015703. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/1/015703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kryukov AI, Stroyuk AL, Zin’chuk NN, Korzhak AV, Kuchmii SY: Optical and catalytic properties of Ag2S nanoparticles. J Mol Catal A: Chem 2004, 221: 209–221. 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitova S, Eneva J, Panov A, Haefke H: Infrared photography based on vapor-deposited silver sulfide thin films. J Imaging Sci Technol 1994, 38: 484–488.Google Scholar
  17. Wang H, Qi L: Controlled synthesis of Ag2S, Ag2Se, and Ag nanofibers by using a general sacrificial template and their application in electronic device fabrication. Adv Funct Mater 2008, 18: 1249–1256. 10.1002/adfm.200700953View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang J, Sargent EH: Infrared colloidal quantum dots for photovoltaics: fundamentals and recent progress. Adv Mater 2011, 23: 12–29. 10.1002/adma.201001491View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vogel R, Hoyer P, Weller H: Quantum-sized PbS, CdS, Ag2S, Sb2S3, and Bi2S3 particles as sensitizers for various nanoporous wide-bandgap semiconductors. J Phys Chem 1994, 98: 3183–3188. 10.1021/j100063a022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tubtimtae A, Wu KL, Tung HY, Lee MW, Wang GJ: Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Electrochem Commun 2010, 12: 1158–1160. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.06.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen C, Xie Y, Ali G, Yoo SH, Cho SO: Improved conversion efficiency of Ag2S quantum dot-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanotubes with a ZnO recombination barrier layer. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 462. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-462View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu JJ, Chang RC, Chen DW, Wu CT: Visible to near-infrared light harvesting in Ag2S nanoparticles/ZnO nanowire array photoanodes. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 1368–1372. 10.1039/c2nr11705cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Xie Y, Yoo SH, Chen C, Cho SO: Ag2S quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanotube array photoelectrodes. Mat Sci Eng B 2012, 177: 106–111. 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee YL, Huang BM, Chien HT: Highly efficient CdSe-sensitized TiO2 photoelectrode for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell applications. Chem Mater 2008, 20: 6903–6905. 10.1021/cm802254uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Chang CH, Lee YL: Chemical bath deposition of CdS quantum dots onto mesoscopic TiO2 films for application in quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91: 053503. 10.1063/1.2768311View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu B, Aydil ES: Growth of oriented single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131: 3985–3990. 10.1021/ja8078972View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraeutler B, Bard AJ: Heterogeneous photocatalytic preparation of supported catalysts. Photodeposition of platinum on TiO2 powder and other substrates. J Am Chem Soc 1978, 100: 4317–4318. 10.1021/ja00481a059View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Takai A, Kamat PV: Capture, store, and discharge. Shuttling photogenerated electrons across TiO2–silver interface. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 7369–7376. 10.1021/nn202294bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lide DR: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 83rd edition. Boca Raton: CRC; 2002.Google Scholar


© Hu et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.