Graphitic carbon grown on fluorides by molecular beam epitaxy
© Jerng et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 6 December 2012
Accepted: 27 December 2012
Published: 3 January 2013
We study the growth mechanism of carbon molecules supplied by molecular beam epitaxy on fluoride substrates (MgF2, CaF2, and BaF2). All the carbon layers form graphitic carbon with different crystallinities depending on the cation. Especially, the growth on MgF2 results in the formation of nanocrystalline graphite (NCG). Such dependence on the cation is a new observation and calls for further systematic studies with other series of substrates. At the same growth temperature, the NCG on MgF2 has larger clusters than those on oxides. This is contrary to the general expectation because the bond strength of the carbon-fluorine bond is larger than that of the carbon-oxygen bond. Our results show that the growth of graphitic carbon does not simply depend on the chemical bonding between the carbon and the anion in the substrate.
KeywordsGraphene Graphitic carbon Molecular beam epitaxy Fluoride 81.05.uf 81.15.Hi 78.30.Ly
From the success of graphene growth on Ni or Cu by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [1, 2], some variations were introduced to CVD to avoid the use of metallic catalysts [3–8]. However, the growth of carbon by chemical methods involves a complex mechanism due to the presence of carrier gases. For example, hydrogen acts as an etching reagent as well as a co-catalyst . In contrast, physical deposition methods such as molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) are useful to understand the growth mechanism of carbon because of the relatively simple kinetics [10–13]. Experimentally, it has been shown that nanocrystalline graphite (NCG) could be formed on crystalline and amorphous oxides by direct sublimation of carbon [14–16]. Although first-principles calculations partly explained that the strong bonding between carbon and oxygen limited the cluster size [14, 16], the growth mechanism is yet to be understood.
So far, carbon MBE has been tried on substrates containing elements from group IV [10–13], group V , and group VI [12, 14–16]. Here, we present the results of carbon MBE on fluorides (where the anion belongs to group VII) and compare them with similar studies on oxides to understand the effect of the anion on the quality of NCG. Since the bonding between carbon and fluorine is much stronger than the bonding between carbon and oxygen, we expected the carbon film to be more amorphous. On the contrary, NCG of good crystallinity was formed on MgF2, and the cluster size deduced from Raman spectra was even larger than those of NCGs on MgO and sapphire [18, 19]. These results show that the quality of NCG does not simply depend on the bond strength of carbon and substrate anion, and imply that the carbon growth mechanism could be more complex than previously thought.
Materials and film fabrication
Carbon MBE was done using a home-made ultra-high-vacuum MBE system and a carbon sublimation cell with a pyrolytic graphite filament. The pressure of the chamber was kept below 1.0×10−7 Torr during the growth by flowing liquid nitrogen in the shroud. Details about the growth procedure can be found elsewhere . Fluoride substrates (MgF2(100), CaF2(100), and BaF2(111)) were purchased from a commercial vendor (CrysTec GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The growth temperature was fixed at 900°C because of the lower melting points of fluoride substrates compared to oxides.
Raman scattering measurements and spatial mapping were performed using a micro-Raman spectroscope (inVia system, Renishaw, Wotton-under-Edge, UK) operated by a 514.5-nm laser. A minimal laser power of 2 mW was used during the measurements to avoid any damage or heating of the carbon films. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were taken by a commercial system (NanoFocus Inc., Seoul, South Korea) in a non-contact mode. AFM in a contact mode was also used to determine the film thickness by measuring the step height after lithography. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements to analyze carbon bonding characteristics were done using a Kratos X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Ltd, Manchester, UK) with Mg Kα X-ray source. C1s spectra were acquired at 150-W X-ray power with a pass energy of 20 eV and a resolution step of 0.1 eV.
Results and discussion
Fitting results of the Raman spectra from the graphitic carbon on MgF 2
All these results indicate that NCG on MgF2 is less disordered than those on oxides. This is quite surprising if we consider the bond strength of the C-F bond, which is larger than the C-O bond strength [18, 19]. The high electronegativity of fluorine even makes the C-F bond partially ionic. From first-principles calculations, we have known that the strong C-O bond limits the cluster size of NCG on sapphire and MgO [14, 16]. If that is the whole story, the stronger C-F bond should lead to smaller clusters on MgF2. Our results against this imply that an important factor is missing in the theoretical understanding of the NCG growth mechanism. Recently, models such as the catalytic role of step edges or the migration of cyclic carbons are good examples of pertinent suggestions [4, 21].
In summary, we have grown graphitic carbon on fluoride substrates, expanding the application of carbon MBE into group VII anions. While amorphous carbons were formed on CaF2 and BaF2, nanocrystalline graphite of good crystallinity was formed on MgF2 despite the strong bonding between carbon and fluorine. In comparison to similar studies on MgO, the effect of the substrate anion on the quality of NCG contradicts the expectation based on the bond strength between carbon and the anion. Further systematic studies and theoretical investigations are encouraged to understand the carbon growth mechanism by MBE.
Atomic force microscopy
Chemical vapor deposition
The full width at half maximum
Molecular beam epitaxy
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.
This research was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program (2012–0005859), the Basic Science Research Program (2012–0007298, 2012–040278), the Center for Topological Matter in POSTECH (2012–0009194), and the Nanomaterial Technology Development Program (2012M3A7B4049888) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST).
- Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Kim KS, Ahn J-H, Kim P, Choi J-Y, Hong BH: Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 2009, 457: 706–710. 10.1038/nature07719View Article
- Li X, Cai W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D, Piner R, Velamakanni A, Jung I, Tutuc E, Banerjee SK, Colombo L, Ruoff RS: Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 2009, 324: 1312–1314. 10.1126/science.1171245View Article
- Su CY, Lu AY, Wu CY, Li YT, Liu KK, Zhang W, Lin SY, Juang ZY, Zhong YL, Chen FR, Li LJ: Direct formation of wafer scale graphene thin layers on insulating substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 3612–3616. 10.1021/nl201362nView Article
- Scott A, Dianat A, Borrnert F, Bachmatiuk A, Zhang SS, Warner JH, Borowiak-Palen E, Knupfer M, Buchner B, Cuniberti G, Rummeli MH: The catalytic potential of high-kappa dielectrics for graphene formation. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98: 073110. 10.1063/1.3556639View Article
- Kidambi PR, Bayer BC, Weatherup RS, Ochs R, Ducati C, Szabó DV, Hofmann S: Hafnia nanoparticles – a model system for graphene growth on a dielectric. Phys Status Solidi Rapid Res Lett 2011, 5: 341–343. 10.1002/pssr.201100155View Article
- Song HJ, Son M, Park C, Lim H, Levendorf MP, Tsen AW, Park J, Choi HC: Large scale metal-free synthesis of graphene on sapphire and transfer-free device fabrication. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 3050–3054. 10.1039/c2nr30330bView Article
- Bi H, Sun SR, Huang FQ, Xie XM, Jiang MH: Direct growth of few-layer graphene films on SiO2 substrates and their photovoltaic applications. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 411–416. 10.1039/c1jm14778aView Article
- Medina H, Lin YC, Jin CH, Lu CC, Yeh CH, Huang KP, Suenaga K, Robertson J, Chiu PW: Metal-free growth of nanographene on silicon oxides for transparent conducting applications. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22: 2123–2128. 10.1002/adfm.201102423View Article
- Vlassiouk I, Regmi M, Fulvio PF, Dai S, Datskos P, Eres G, Smirnov S: Role of hydrogen in chemical vapor deposition growth of large single-crystal graphene. ACS Nano 2011, 5: 6069–6076. 10.1021/nn201978yView Article
- Hackley J, Ali D, DiPasquale J, Demaree JD, Richardson CJK: Graphitic carbon growth on Si(111) using solid source molecular beam epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 133114. 10.1063/1.3242029View Article
- Al-Temimy A, Riedl C, Starke U: Low temperature growth of epitaxial graphene on SiC induced by carbon evaporation. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95: 231907–231907–3.View Article
- Maeda F, Hibino H: Thin graphitic structure formation on various substrates by gas-source molecular beam epitaxy using cracked ethanol. Jpn J Appl Phys 2010, 49: 04DH13–04DH13–6.
- Moreau E, Godey S, Ferrer FJ, Vignaud D, Wallart X, Avila J, Asensio MC, Bournel F, Gallet JJ: Graphene growth by molecular beam epitaxy on the carbon-face of SiC. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97: 241907. 10.1063/1.3526720View Article
- Jerng SK, Yu DS, Kim YS, Ryou J, Hong S, Kim C, Yoon S, Efetov DK, Kim P, Chun SH: Nanocrystalline graphite growth on sapphire by carbon molecular beam epitaxy. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 4491–4494.View Article
- Jerng SK, Yu DS, Lee JH, Kim C, Yoon S, Chun SH: Graphitic carbon growth on crystalline and amorphous oxide substrates using molecular beam epitaxy. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6: 565. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-565View Article
- Jerng SK, Lee JH, Yu DS, Kim YS, Ryou J, Hong S, Kim C, Yoon S, Chun SH: Graphitic carbon growth on MgO(100) by molecular beam epitaxy. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116: 7380–7385. 10.1021/jp210910uView Article
- Jerng SK, Yu DS, Lee JH, Kim YS, Kim C, Yoon S, Chun SH: Carbon molecular beam epitaxy on various semiconductor substrates. Mater Res Bull 2012, 47: 2772–2775. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.04.123View Article
- O'Hagan D: Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C-F bond. Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37: 308–319. 10.1039/b711844aView Article
- Lemal DM: Perspective on fluorocarbon chemistry. J Org Chem 2004, 69: 1–11. 10.1021/jo0302556View Article
- Ferrari AC: Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Comm 2007, 143: 47–57. 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052View Article
- Lippert G, Dabrowski J, Yamamoto Y, Herziger F, Maultzsch J, Lemme MC, Mehr W, Lupina G: Molecular beam growth of micrometer-size graphene on mica. Carbon 2013, 52: 40–48.View Article
- Ermolieff A, Chabli A, Pierre F, Rolland G, Rouchon D, Vannuffel C, Vergnaud C, Baylet J, Semeria MN: XPS, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, specular X-ray reflectivity, transmission electron microscopy and elastic recoil detection analysis of emissive carbon film characterization. Surf Interface Anal 2001, 31: 185–190. 10.1002/sia.955View Article
- Luo Z, Yu T, Kim K-j, Ni Z, You Y, Lim S, Shen Z, Wang S, Lin J: Thickness-dependent reversible hydrogenation of graphene layers. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 1781–1788. 10.1021/nn900371tView Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.