Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process of beer wastes (Almaza Brewery) yields a biochar and homogeneous carbon-based nanoparticles (NPs). The NPs have been used to prepare carbon membrane on commercial alumina support. Water filtration experiments evidenced the quasi-dense behavior of the membrane with no measurable water flux below an applied nitrogen pressure of 6 bar. Gas permeation tests were conducted and gave remarkable results, namely (1) the existence of a limit temperature of utilization of the membrane, which was below 100°C in our experimental conditions, (2) an evolution of the microstructure of the carbon membrane with the operating temperature that yielded to improved performances in gas separation, (3) the temperature-dependent gas permeance should follow a Knudsen diffusion mechanism, and (4) He permeance was increasing with the applied pressure, whereas N2 and CO2 permeances remained stable in the same conditions. These results yielded an enhancement of both the He/N2 and He/CO2 permselectivities with the applied pressure. These promising results made biomass-sourced HTC-processed carbon membranes encouraging candidates as ultralow-cost and sustainable membranes for gas separation applications.
In the recent years, attention has been focused on carbon-based nanomaterials to face environmental issues . Mainly in the form of carbon nanotubes, these nanomaterials were advantageously used as building blocks for water filtration and gas permeation membranes, adsorbents, and environmentally friendly energy applications such as gas storage or electrodes for (bio) fuel cells [2–8]. Since 1980, carbon membranes have shown interesting performances, particularly in gas separation . The chemical and physical features of carbon nanomaterials experimentally depend on the raw materials and on the preparation process. In a global and integrated sustainable route, biomass can be advantageously used as a carbon source [2, 5, 10–18]. These raw materials obviously represent a very low-cost alternative and possible high availability compared to petrol-derived commercial carbon sources such as classical polymeric precursors: polyacrylonitrile, polyamide and its derivatives, and cellulose [9, 16]. In order to convert biomass (carbohydrate) into carbon materials, two main routes can be used, namely a pyrolysis approach or a hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) [10–12, 19, 20]. The HTC process can provide carbon materials with low energy consumption (<350°C) and with limited environmental impacts due to the non-generation of CO2 during conversion reactions. The HTC process is usually performed in a sealed autoclave and in the presence of water [10–12]. In 1913, Bergius has done pioneer works on cellulose conversion to carbon materials. The process he developed was thus extended to various carbon sources like carbohydrates such as glucose [10, 12, 21]. In a similar field, Antonietti et al. have performed pioneer works by elaborating a variety of carbon-based microstructures and nanostructures from hard or soft sources such as orange peels, oak leaves, pine cones, pine needles, and rice [10–12, 17, 22, 23].
In the present study, our aim was to produce ultralow-cost membranes by sustainable routes to answer environmental issues (water and air filtrations) affecting some emerging and third countries, such as Lebanon. The strategy we developed is based on the valorization of natural products and food industry by-products. We develop a process based on the hydrothermal carbonization of Lebanese beer wastes to produce carbon-based nanoparticles (NPs). The obtained NPs were then used to produce carbon membranes of which performances in water filtration and gas separation will be presented and discussed.
Synthesis of carbon-based nanoparticles by hydrothermal carbonization
Carbon nanoparticles were synthesized from beer wastes by a hydrothermal carbonization process. Beer wastes were obtained from Almaza Brewery (Heineken International, Beirut, Lebanon), rated as the first brewery in Lebanon since 1933. The wastes were collected after the filtration process of beer mixture and are essentially composed of malt, water, and yeast. After drying at 100°C for 14 h, the ensuing solid was ground in a ball miller for 4 h at 200 rpm. Citric acid (Sigma-Aldrich Co., Dorset, England, UK) was used as an activating agent in the carbonization reaction .
The reaction was carried out in a non-stirred, 300-mL capacity Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (Parr Instrument Company, Moline, Illinois, USA), in which the temperature is controlled by a thermocouple (Eurotherm regulator, Invensys Eurotherm, Ashburn, VI, USA). During heating and due to experimental setup limitation, the temperature cannot exceed 350°C and the pressure of 200 bar. In a typical experiment, 15 g of beer wastes was dispersed in 120 mL of pure water for 30 min, and then, 30 mg of citric acid was added as an activating agent for the carbonization reactions occurring during the HTC process. The autoclave was sealed and heated up to 220°C for 16 h, these operating conditions being similar to HTC biomass conversion . After the HTC process, the crude product contained a precipitate, the biochar (or hydrochar) and a colloidal solution, which were easily separated by centrifugation (8,000 rpm; 30 min). The charcoal was washed several times with water (18 mΩ) and then dried in an oven at 80°C for 12 h before further characterization. The colloidal solution was used as obtained. Alternatively, the colloids were destabilized by the addition of ammonia solution (1 M) up to pH of approximately 9 to yield the formation of a precipitate by colloid aggregation. The solid was filtered off on a 0.45-μm micrometric filter (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and washed several times with water (18 mΩ), and then dried in an oven at 80°C for 2 h. For experimentation of the HTC process, it is necessary to keep in mind that for security reasons, starting solution should not exceed two thirds of the total autoclave volume.
Carbon membrane preparation
In order to prepare porous carbon membranes, the obtained colloidal solution was concentrated at 70% (v/v) and then deposited on the inner surface of low-ultrafiltration tubular alumina membranes (ES 1426, 5 nm, Pall Membralox, NY, USA) by slip casting. The obtained membrane was treated in a tubular oven under a nitrogen atmosphere up to 1,000°C (120°C/h up to 500°C (1-h dwell) then 180°C/h up to 1,000°C (3-h dwell)).
The soluble fraction of the used beer waste was characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using a Bruker Advance 300-MHz NMR spectrometer (Madison, WI, USA), using D2O as reference solvent. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy was performed using the KBr pellet technique using a Spectrum Nicolet 710 Fourier-transformed IR (FTIR) apparatus in the range 4,000 to 450 cm-1. Raman spectrum was recorded at room temperature with an Ar-Kr laser LabRAM 1B spectrometer (HORIBA, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The morphology of carbon particles was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a HITACHI S4800 microscope (Chiyoda-ku, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used for deep investigation of the nanoparticles produced. This was carried out using a Philips CM20 microscope (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) operating at 200 KV at a resolution of 1.4 Å. Carbon membranes were analyzed by nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm using BET techniques (ASAP 2012, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) in order to identify the specific surface area of the membrane and estimate the pore diameters. Scanning electron microscopy was also used to visualize the morphology and the thickness of the elaborated carbon layer. The water filtration experiments were conducted on a home-made filtration pilot. The dynamic gas permeation test was performed on a classical separation pilot using N2, He, and CO2.
Results and discussion
Beer waste characterization
The solid beer waste sample, generated by filtration just before the filling step of the beer bottles, was directly collected from the Almaza Brewery in Lebanon. The soluble fraction of waste in D2O was analyzed by 1H NMR (Figure 1). The signals around 1.3 ppm are attributed to lipidic protons and the signals between 3.0 and 4.5 ppm to carbohydrate ones . This analysis is in agreement with the reported composition of beer waste [25, 26].
Carbon nanoparticles preparation and characterization
A suspension of beer wastes particles in aqueous citric acid was used as starting solution for the hydrothermal carbonization process. After reaction, the solid charcoal was separated from a colloidal solution by centrifugation. For analysis purposes, the carbon-based nanoparticles were precipitated upon aggregation by addition of ammonia solution (1 M) up to pH of approximately 9.
Morphological characterization of the nanoparticles
The carbon-based solid and nanoparticles were first observed by scanning electron microscopy and/or transmission electron microscopy in order to determine their morphology. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the hydrochar produced by the HTC process. It can be seen that the particles are micrometric to millimetric in sizes, highly heterogeneous, and partially nanostructured in surface. This structure is presumably mimicking the one of the biomass before carbonization.
In contrast, the solid collected by destabilization of the colloid solutions is composed of agglomerated nanoparticles (Figure 3). Figure 3a,b shows field emission gun-SEM images of the as-obtained solid. The lowest quality of the image Figure 3b collected at higher magnification is due to the sample preparation procedure that did not contain any metallization step. However, this magnification allows the observation of the particle diameter with an improved accuracy. The nanoparticles exhibit a homogeneous size distribution, between 5 and 9 nm. Figure 3c,d shows typical TEM images of the nanoparticles. It is interesting to notice that the TEM grids were prepared from ethanol suspension of nanoparticles. The TEM analysis clearly underlines therefore that the agglomeration process obtained by ammonia addition is completely reversible. The morphology of these nanoparticles is very similar to the one reported for the particles obtained by HTC conversion of glucose [10, 19, 20].
The biochar and nanoparticles were analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 4 shows typical infrared spectrum of dried biochar. By comparison with references from the literature, different stretching and vibration bands were attributed (see Figure 4) [11, 18, 19]. As a result, the crude biochar is obviously not fully mineralized and contains a large amount of lipid groups and some carbohydrates.
In contrast, Figure 5 shows a typical FTIR spectrum of nanoparticles. Important differences with the infrared spectrum of the biochar can be noticed. Similar bands have been detected, underlining the common origin of these two products. However, the signals corresponding to the carbohydrates (OH, C-O, and C-O-C vibrations) are significantly more intense in this spectrum. The nanoparticles contain therefore a more important proportion of carbohydrates to lipids than the corresponding biochar. We assume therefore that the fraction of carbohydrates, in water suspension during the HTC process, plays a key role in the formation of the nanoparticles. Further experiments will be conducted in order to collect experimental evidences for confirming or refuting this hypothesis.
Biochar and nanoparticles were analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. Spectra for polycrystalline graphite usually show a narrow G peak (approximately 1,580 cm-1) attributed to in-plane vibrations of crystalline graphite, and a smaller D peak (approximately 1,360 cm-1) attributed to disordered amorphous carbon . As shown in Figure 6, the two peaks featuring amorphous carbon (D, 1,360 cm-1) and crystalline graphite (G, 1,587 cm-1) are present, but their relative intensity is different than in polycrystalline graphite. This result is in good agreement with works conducted on other nanoshaped carbons like nanopearls  and nanospheres .
The Raman spectrum recorded for the nanoparticles did not show any peaks. This result was also obtained by other groups on nanoshaped carbons [19, 20]. It was attributed to the fraction of graphitized carbon inside the nanoparticles which is too low to gain any significant signal. These authors used silver nanoparticles and surface-enhanced Raman scattering effect to overcome this drawback. We had a different approach by carbonizing the nanoparticles under nitrogen up to 1,400°C. The expected effect was to increase the ratio between the graphitized part of the nanoparticles and the non-mineral surface region. The different Raman spectra are presented in Figure 7. It is important to notice that the same amount of matter was analyzed during these different experiments. It is obvious that an increase of the heating temperature of the nanoparticles induces an improvement in the collected Raman signal. On the spectrum recorded for nanoparticles fired at 1,400°C, the D, G, and D’ bands were clearly identified. The relative ratio between these three peaks clearly shows the large amount of defects in the nanoparticles.
Carbon membrane preparation and characterization
A carbon membrane was elaborated from the as-obtained colloidal solution, using the slip-casting technique. The agglomerated nanoparticle layer formed after deposition on the inner surface of commercial tubular alumina support was heated under argon for 2 h at 1,000°C for consolidation purposes. The formation of the carbon-based membrane was easily and visually detected by the formation of a glossy black inner surface. Figure 8 shows the SEM image of the membrane deposited on the asymmetric alumina support (cross-sectional view). The gray coloration of the alumina below the carbon layer clearly indicates the partial infiltration of colloids inside the support during the slip-casting process. The membrane exhibits a homogeneous thickness of about 50 nm. The surface appears to be rough, remembering its colloidal origin (see also Figure 9). Some particles are also observable on the surface of the layer, which were presumably generated upon breaking the membrane and support system.
The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm was recorded for the membrane and support system (Figure 10). For that purpose, the alumina support was sanded in order to reveal the contribution of the carbon layer. This curve clearly shows a hysteresis loop featuring the mesoporosity of the layer. This analysis, in the BET approximation, yields a pore diameter of approximately 3.6 nm (low mesoporosity). However, it is not possible to determine if this measured porosity is only due to the presence of the porous carbon membrane or partially due to the residual alumina support not totally discarded by sanding. We decided therefore to conduct dynamic water and gas separation measurements.
For a further dynamic characterization of the carbon membrane, water permeability has been measured by recording the water flux through the membrane as a function of the applied nitrogen pressure on the feed solution at room temperature. Figure 11a shows the water flux through the commercial alumina support as a function of the applied pressure, in the range of 3–15 bars. As expected, we obtained an almost linear evolution in which values are in good agreement with the ones reported by the manufacturer. In Figure 11b, the water flux through the carbon membrane deposited on alumina nanofiltration support is evidenced.
As illustrated in Figure 11b, no water flux was measured with carbon membranes below 6 bar of applied nitrogen pressure. The measured permeability is 0.005 L h-1·m-2·bar-1, a value which is 1,000 lower than the commercial alumina system. This result can be interpreted as a very low porous volume accessible inside the membrane. Therefore, this membrane cannot be used for water filtration applications. The quasi-dense behavior of the carbon membrane for low applied external pressure emboldens us to evaluate this material for gas separation.
From the 1970s, carbon membranes have been extensively used for gas separation [6, 9, 28]. Different studies were conducted on membranes originating from different sources such as polymers and carbohydrates (glucose) and have demonstrated promising permeance values in the range of 10-8 to 10-9 mol·m-2·Pa-1·s-1, associated with high selectivity. For instance, a carbon membrane elaborated by pyrolysis of commercial polymers and having a pore diameter between 3 and 5 Å has demonstrated a He/CO2 selectivity of 4, and a He/N2 selectivity between 20 and 40 . In our case, the gas separation test was driven using three types of gases, namely helium (He, kinetic diameter = 2.6 Å), carbon dioxide (CO2, kinetic diameter = 3.3 Å), and nitrogen (N2, kinetic diameter = 3.64 Å). The permeances of these gases were recorded as a function of the pressure at different temperatures of 25°C (T01), 100°C, and after cooling down again to 25°C (T02) (Figure 12). At 25°C, the membrane gave a 10-9 mol·m-2·Pa-1·s-1 permeance value for He, CO2, and N2, which is in good agreement with the values reported in the literature . At 100°C, a stable flux was obtained exhibiting a permeance in the range of 10-7 mol·m-2·Pa-1·s-1. We also observed an increase in the permeance while increasing the temperature up to 100°C whatever the used gas and the applied pressure were . We assume that this result may reflect a Knudsen diffusion mechanism for the gas separation. For CO2 and N2, these systems enter into an apparent stationary regime by varying the pressure, and their permeances appear to become almost constant whatever the applied pressure was. In contrast, the permeance of helium increases with the applied pressure (lower kinetic diameter). As a consequence, the selectivity of helium versus the other gases increases with the pressure up to approximately 2 (Figure 13). This value is lower than the one reported in the literature .
After measurement at 100°C, the membrane was cooled down to 25°C, and its permeance was measured again for each gas (Figure 12). By comparing T01 and T02, we have observed a significant increase of the permeances (by a 102 factor) whatever the studied gas was. By considering this result, we underwent measurements at 200°C. At this temperature, it was not possible to obtain a stabilized flux for any studied gas and therefore to measure any permeance value. After cooling down to 25°C, we have measured again the permeance using helium (Figure 14). As illustrated by this figure, the permeance of the carbon membrane towards helium is increased after the membrane was exposed to higher operating-temperature conditions. Our assumption is that the membrane underwent a microstructural evolution during the high-temperature measurement. In order to confirm the latter, the membrane surface was analyzed by SEM after the experiment, done at 200°C (Figure 14). We can clearly conclude from the images of Figure 9 that the surface of the membrane underwent a microstructural evolution upon heating which yielded to an increase of its surface roughness. Fracture surface view analysis did not reveal any significant evolution of the membrane thickness.
Hydrothermal carbonization process of beer wastes (Almaza Brewery) yields a biochar and homogeneous carbon-based nanoparticles (NPs). Carbohydrates, released by the wastes in water, are supposed to play a role in the formation mechanism of the NPs, and further experiments will be driven in the future to elucidate the latter. The NPs have been used to prepare carbon membrane on commercial alumina support. As evidenced in water filtration experiments, there is a quasi-dense behavior of the membrane with no measurable water flux below an applied pressure of 6 bar. Gas permeation tests were conducted and gave remarkable results: (1) the existence of a limit temperature of utilization of the membrane is below 100°C in our experimental conditions; (2) an evolution of the microstructure of the carbon membrane with the operating temperature yielded to improvement in its gas separation performances; (3) the permeance of the gas is temperature dependent and should be driven by a Knudsen diffusion mechanism; and (4) the He permeance is increasing with the applied pressure in entrance on the system, whereas N2 and C02 permeances are stabilizing in the same conditions. This result yields an increase of the selectivity He/N2 and He/CO2 with the applied pressure. The obtained selectivity values are below the ones reported in the literature but further experiments are in progress in order to improve this value by optimizing the membrane microstructure and porosity. These promising results made biomass-sourced HTC-processed carbon membranes promising candidates as ultralow-cost and sustainable membranes for gas separation applications. Since He exhibits a kinetic diameter closed to that of H2, applications as membrane for H2 separation can be envisaged, for instance, for fuel cell applications.
The authors would like to thank the Lebanese ALMAZA company for providing large quantities of beer wastes, especially Maroun Ammouri, and would also deeply thank Christophe Charmette (IEMM) and Gilles Nunez for conducting the gas separation measurements. Authors are grateful to Eddy Petit, Didier Cot, and Abed-el-Salam Mansouri for their cooperation in the membrane characterizations. Thanks to the Erasmus Mundus EC JOSYLEEN program for the Ph.D. grant.
Institut Européen des Membranes, UMR 5635, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM), CNRS, Université Montpellier 2
Applied Physic Laboratory (LPA), Faculty of Sciences II, PR2N EDST, Lebanese University
Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University
Ong YT, Ahmad AL, Hussein S, Zein S, Tan SH: A review on carbon nanotubes in an environmental protection and green engineering perspective. Braz J Chem Eng 2010, 27: 227.
Zeng X, Ma Y, Ma L: Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11: 976. 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.003View Article
Serp P, Figueiredo JL: Carbon Materials for Catalysis. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey; 2009.
Sachdeva S, Kumar A: Preparation of nanoporous composite carbon membrane for separation of rhodamine B dye. J Membr Sci 2009, 329: 2. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.050View Article
Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici M-M, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich K-H: Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2(1):71. 10.4155/bfs.10.81View Article
Ismail AF, David LIB: A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 2001, 193: 1. 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00510-5View Article
Che A-F, Germain V, Cretin M, Cornu D, Innocent C, Tingry S: Fabrication of free-standing electrospun carbon nanofibers as efficient electrode materials for bioelectrocatalysis. New J Chem 2011, 35: 2848. 10.1039/c1nj20651fView Article
Imoto K, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi T, Komura T, Nakamura J-I, Murata K: High-performance carbon counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Solar Energy Materials Solar Cells 2003, 79: 459. 10.1016/S0927-0248(03)00021-7View Article
Saufi SM, Ismail AF: Fabrication of carbon membranes for gas separation––a review. Carbon 2004, 42: 241. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.10.022View Article
Titirici M-M, Thomas A, Antonietti M: Back in the black: hydrothermal carbonization of plant material as an efficient chemical process to treat the CO2 problem? New J Chem 2007, 31: 787. 10.1039/b616045jView Article
Titirici M-M, Antonietti M, Baccile N: Hydrothermal carbon from biomass: a comparison of the local structure from poly- to monosaccharides and pentoses/hexoses. Green Chem 2008, 10: 1204. 10.1039/b807009aView Article
Titirici MM, Antoine T, Yu SH, Muller JO, Antonietti M: A direct synthesis of mesoporous carbons with bicontinuous pore morphology from crude plant material by hydrothermal carbonization. Chem Mater 2007, 19: 4205. 10.1021/cm0707408View Article
Savov D, Apak E, Ekinci E, Yardim F, Petrov N, Budinova T, Razvigorova M, Minkova V: Biomass conversion to carbon adsorbents and gas. Biomass Bioenerg 2001, 21: 133. 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00027-7View Article
Kalderis D, Bethanis S, Paraskeva P, Diamadopoulos E: Production of activated carbon from bagasse and rice husks by a single-stage chemical activation method at low retention times. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99: 6809. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.041View Article
Inoue S: Hydrothermal carbonization of empty fruit bunches. J Chem Eng Japan 2010, 43: 972. 10.1252/jcej.10we027View Article
Hu B-B, Wang K, Wu L, Yu S-H, Antonietti M, Titrici M-M: Engineering carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass. Adv Mater 2010, 22: 813. 10.1002/adma.200902812View Article
Cui X, Antonietti M, Yu S-H: Structural effects of iron oxide nanoparticles and iron ions on the hydrothermal carbonization of starch and rice carbohydrates. Small 2006, 2: 756. 10.1002/smll.200600047View Article
Sevilla M, Fuertes AB: The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 2009, 47: 2281. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026View Article
Wang Q, Cao F, Chen Q, Chen C: Preparation of carbon micro-spheres by hydrothermal treatment of methylcellulose sol. Mater Lett 2005, 59: 3738. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.046View Article
Sun X, Li Y: Colloidal carbon spheres and their core/shell structures with noble-metal nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 2004, 43: 597. 10.1002/anie.200352386View Article
Heilmann SM, Davis HT, Jader LR, Lefebvre PA, Sadowsky MJ, Schendel FJ, von Keitz MG, Valentas KJ: Hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae. Biomass Energy 2010, 34(6):875. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.032View Article
Demir-Cakan R, Baccile N, Antonietti M, Titirici M-M: Carboxylate-rich carbonaceous materials via one step hydrothermal carbonization of glucose in the presence of acrylic acid. Chem Mater 2009, 21: 484. 10.1021/cm802141hView Article
Antonietti M, Titirici M-M: Coal from carbohydrates: the chimie douce of carbon. C R Chimie 2009, 13: 167.View Article
Khatib A PhD thesis. In Studies of iso-alpha-acids: analysis, purification, and stability. Leiden University; 2006.
Almeida C, Duarte IF, Barros A, Rodrigues J, Spraul M, Gil AM: Composition of beer by 1H NMR spectroscopy: effects of brewing site and date of production. J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54: 700. 10.1021/jf0526947View Article
Janhom T, Wattanachir S, Pavasant P: Characterization of brewery wastewater with spectrofluorometry analysis. J Environ Manage 2009, 90: 1184. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.008View Article
Hunter CN, Hager CH, Voevodin AA: Tribological properties of carbon nanopearls synthesized by nickel-catalyzed chemical vapor deposition. Tribology Lett 2008, 30: 169. 10.1007/s11249-008-9324-3View Article
Centeno TA, Fuertes AB: Carbon molecular sieve gas separation membranes based on poly(vinylidene chloride-co-vinyl chloride). Carbon 2000, 38: 1067. 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00214-6View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.