Open Access

Ferromagnetism in freestanding MoS2 nanosheets

  • Daqiang Gao1,
  • Mingsu Si1,
  • Jinyun Li1,
  • Jing Zhang1,
  • Zhipeng Zhang1,
  • Zhaolong Yang1 and
  • Desheng Xue1Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:129

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-129

Received: 21 January 2013

Accepted: 18 February 2013

Published: 16 March 2013


Freestanding MoS2 nanosheets with different sizes were prepared through a simple exfoliated method by tuning the ultrasonic time in the organic solvent. Magnetic measurement results reveal the clear room-temperature ferromagnetism for all the MoS2 nanosheets, in contrast to the pristine MoS2 in its bulk form which shows diamagnetism only. Furthermore, results indicate that the saturation magnetizations of the nanosheets increase as the size decreases. Combining the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron spin resonance results, it is suggested that the observed magnetization is related to the presence of edge spins on the edges of the nanosheets. These MoS2 nanosheets may find applications in nanodevices and spintronics by controlling the edge structures.


Ferromagnetism MoS2 nanosheets Exfoliation


As a kind of layered semiconducting material, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has attracted much research interest due its unique physical, optical, and electrical properties correlated with its two-dimensional (2D) ultrathin atomic layer structure [14]. Unlike graphite and layered hexagonal BN (h-BN), the monolayer of MoS2 is composed of three atom layers: a Mo layer sandwiched between two S layers. The triple layers are stacked and held together through weak van der Waals interactions [510]. Recently, reports demonstrate strong photoluminescence emergence and anomalous lattice vibrations in single- and few-layered MoS2 films [5, 6], which exemplify the evolution of the physical and structural properties in MoS2, due to the transition from a three-dimensional to a 2D configuration. Results also indicate that the single-layer MoS2 exhibits a high channel mobility (approximately 200 cm2 V−1 s−1) and current on/off ratio (1 × 108) when it was used as the channel material in a field-effect transistor [7]. Most recently, it is proposed that the indirect band gap of bulk MoS2 with a magnitude of approximately 1.2 eV transforms gradually to a direct band gap of approximately 1.8 eV in single-layer samples [8, 9], which is in contrast to pristine graphene with a band gap of about 0 eV and few-layered h-BN with a band gap of about 5.5 eV [10, 11]. All these results imply that 2D MoS2 nanosheets have possible potential applications in electronics, optics, and semiconductor technologies as promising complements to graphene and h-BN [511].

Recently, based on first-principle calculations, lots of reports reveal the promising electronic properties of monolayer MoS2 nanosheets and nanoribbons, predicting their potential application in spintronic devices [1215]. Calculation results indicate that MoS2-triple vacancy created in a single-layer MoS2 can give rise to a net magnetic moment, while other defects related with Mo and S atoms do not influence the nonmagnetic ground state [13]. Shidpour et al. performed the calculation on the sulfur vacancy-related magnetic properties on the S-edge with 50% and 100% coverage of MoS2 nanoribbons, showing that a vacancy on the S-edge with 50% coverage intensifies the magnetization of the edge of the MoS2 nanoribbon, but such a vacancy on the S-edge with 100% coverage causes this magnetic property to disappear [14]. Most recently, for the MoS2 nanoribbons, Pan et al. and Li et al. predicted that S-terminated zigzag nanoribbons are the most stable even without hydrogen saturation. MoS2 zigzag nanoribbons are metallic and ferromagnetic, and their conductivity may be semiconducting or half metallic by controlling the edge structures saturated with H atoms. The armchair nanoribbons are semiconducting and nonmagnetic, with band gaps increased by the hydrogen saturation of their edge states [15, 16]. Inconsequently, Botello-Mendez et al. found that armchair nanoribbons could be metallic and exhibit a magnetic moment. Besides, when passivating with hydrogen, the armchair nanoribbons become semiconducting [17].

Though a lot of interesting magnetic properties of MoS2 nanosheets and nanoribbons had been predicted, the corresponding experimental realization on MoS2 nanosheets and nanoribbons has been at the nascent stage. The reason may be the difficulties in the synthesis methods because MoS2 tends to form zero-dimensional closed structures (fullerene-like nanoparticles) or one-dimensional nanotube structures during the experimental fabrications as well as lower crystalline structures [1820]. What we know so far, the only experimental report on magnetism in MoS2 came from a study on MoS2 nanosheet film deposition on Si (100) and tantalum foil substrates synthesized using thermal evaporation method. A confirmatory test was also employed to rule out the samples' contaminants, where MoS2 nanotubes fabricated on an alumina template using the similar source and setup were tested to be nonmagnetic [21]. However, the interface between the film and substrate as well as the substrate itself could influence the local structures and, subsequently, the magnetic properties of the samples [22]. Therefore, synthesis and understanding of the edge-based magnetism in substrate-free MoS2 nanosheets or nanoribbons are very necessary, and a further sensitive experimental verification is required.

In this paper, solution exfoliation method was employed to fabricate the MoS2 nanosheets with different sizes [23]. The structure and the magnetic properties of these nanosheets were studied.


MoS2 nanosheets were prepared through exfoliation of bulk MoS2 (purchased from the J&K Chemical, Beijing, China) with different times. In a typical synthesis progress, 0.5-g MoS2 powders were sonicated in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 100 mL) to disperse the powder for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h, respectively. After precipitation, the black dispersion was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for about 20 min to remove the residual large-size MoS2 powders. Then, the remainder solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 h to obtain the black products. To remove the excess surfactant, the samples were repeatedly washed with ethanol and centrifuged. Finally, the samples were dried at 60°C in vacuum condition.

The morphologies of the samples were obtained by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, Tecnai™ G2 F30, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD, X'Pert PRO PHILIPS (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) with CuKα radiation) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were employed to study the structure of the samples. The measurements of magnetic properties were made using the Quantum Design MPMS magnetometer (Quantum Design, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) based on a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The spectrometer at a microwave frequency of 8.984 GHz was used for electron spin resonance (ESR JEOL, JES-FA300, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) measurements. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG ESCALAB 210, Thermo VG Scientific, East Grinstead, UK) was utilized to determine the bonding characteristics and the composition of the samples. The vibration properties were characterized by Raman scattering spectra measurement, which was performed on a Jobin Yvon LabRam HR80 spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin Yvon Inc., Edison, NJ, USA; with a 325-nm line of Torus 50-mW diode-pumped solid-state laser (Laser Quantum, San Jose, CA, USA)) under backscattering geometry. The infrared absorption spectra of the samples were conducted with the KBr pellet method on a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR; NEXUS 670, Thermo Nicolet Corp., Madison, WI, USA) in the range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1. Atomic force microscopy (AFM; Dimension 3100 with Nanoscope IIIa controller, Veeco, CA, USA) was used to confirm the layer number by measuring the thicknesses in tapping mode in air.

Results and discussion

Sonication is known to peel off layered MoS2 from the pristine one due to interactions between solvent molecules and the surface of the pristine MoS2 powder [23]. The sonication time was tuned in our case to control the synthesis of the MoS2 nanosheets with different sizes and thicknesses. Typical XRD spectra of the pristine MoS2 used for exfoliation and the obtained sample are shown in Figure 1a; the reflection peaks can be assigned to the family lattice planes of hexagonal MoS2 (JCPDS card no.77-1716). After sonication in DMF for 10 h, the intensity of the (002) peak decreases abruptly, implying the formation of a few-layer MoS2 in the sample [24, 25]. Furthermore, there is no other new phase introduced into the exfoliated MoS2 samples. The bonding characteristics and the composition of the exfoliated MoS2 samples were captured by XPS. Results indicate that the wide XPS spectra of the exfoliated MoS2 sample (10 h) show only signals arising from elements Mo and S besides element C (result is not shown here). The Mo 3d XPS spectrum of MoS2 nanosheets, reported in Figure 1b, shows two strong peaks at 229.3 and 232.5 eV, respectively, which are attributed to the doublet Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2, while the peak at 226.6 eV can be indexed as S 2s. The peaks, corresponding to the S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2 orbital of divalent sulfide ions (S2−), are observed at 163.3 and 162.1 eV (shown in Figure 1c). All these results are consistent with the reported values for the MoS2 crystal [26, 27].
Figure 1

XRD results and high-resolution XPS spectra. (a) XRD results of MoS2 nanosheets and pristine MoS2 powders. High-resolution XPS spectra of (b) Mo 3d and (c) S 2p for the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (10 h).

To better understand the exfoliation process and the nanosheet products, microscopic investigations were performed. TEM results for the exfoliated MoS2 sonicated at different times as shown in Figure 2a,b,c indicate that the samples have a sheet structure in irregular shapes, and the size of the nanosheets decreases gradually as the sonication time increases. Corresponding SAED results for the MoS2 nanosheets given in Figure 2d,e,f reveal the single crystal MoS2 in hexagonal structure. The HRTEM image in Figure 3a clearly reveals the periodic atom arrangement of the MoS2 nanosheets at a selected location, in which the interplanar spacing was measured to be 0.27 nm according to the periodic pattern in the lattice fringe image, matching up with that of the (100) facet of MoS2 (2.736 Å). HRTEM investigation in the edge areas was a common and direct method to determine the layer numbers microscopically [28]. In our case, as presented in Figure 3b, three to four dark and bright patterns can be readily identified for the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheet (10 h), indicating that the sample was stacked up with three to four single layers. For comparison, tapping mode AFM image of the MoS2 nanosheet (10 h) is shown in Figure 3c prominently; the thickness was measured to be only 2.0 nm, corresponding to the fundamental thickness of three single atomic layers of MoS2. Raman spectrum was used to confirm the few-layered MoS2 nanosheets. Generally, single-layer MoS2 exhibited strong bands at 384 and 400 cm−1, which are associated with the in-plane vibrational (E2g1) and the out-of-plane vibrational (A1g) modes, respectively [26]. As the layer number increased, a red shift of the (E2g1) band and a blueshift of the A1g bands would be observed. Figure 3d shows the Raman spectra of the pristine MoS2 powder and the exfoliated MoS2 nansheets (sonicated in DMF for 10 h). Results indicate that the (E2g1) and A1g bands for the pristine and MoS2 nanosheets are located at 376.90 and 379.21 cm−1, and 403.67 and 401.20 cm−1, respectively. The energy difference between two Raman peaks (Δ) can be used to identify the number of MoS2 layers. It can be seen that the Δ value obtained for the two samples is about 26.77 and about 20.62 cm−1, respectively, indicating the existence of the two to three layered MoS2 nanosheets after sonicating pristine MoS2 powders in DMF for about 10 h, which is the same as the TEM and AFM results.
Figure 2

TEM images of the exfoliated MoS 2 nanosheets and their corresponding SAED results. (a, d) 2 h, (b, e) 4 h, and (c, f) 10 h.
Figure 3

HRTEM, TEM, and AFM images and Raman spectra of MoS 2 nanosheets and MoS 2 powder. (a) The HRTEM image of exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (10 h); the d100 is 0.27 nm. The inset is the FFT pattern of the sample. (b) Marginal TEM image of exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (10 h). (c) Tapping mode AFM image of the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (10 h). (d) Raman spectra for the pristine MoS2 powder and exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (10 h).

TEM results indicate that few-layered MoS2 nanosheets can be obtained after sonicating pristine MoS2 powders in DMF with different times; at the same time, the size (the lateral dimension for the nanosheets) of the nanosheets decreases gradually, which motivated us to carry out a comparative study on the size-property correlation magnetic properties of the MoS2 nanosheets. Figure 4a shows the magnetization versus magnetic field (M-H) curves for the pristine MoS2 powders and the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets (sonicated in DMF for 10 h). As can be seen, besides the diamagnetic (DM) signal in the high-field region, the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets show the ferromagnetism (FM) signal in lower field region as well, compared to the pristine MoS2 powders which shows the DM signal only. After deducting the DM signal, the measured saturation magnetizations (Ms) for the MoS2 nanosheets (10 h) are 0.0025 and 0.0011 emu/g at 10 and 300 K, respectively (Figure 4b), which are comparable to other dopant-free diluted magnetic semiconductors [29, 30]. Dependence of the Ms on ultrasonic time of the obtained MoS2 nanosheets is shown in Figure 4c. Results indicate that the Ms of the obtained MoS2 nanosheets increases gradually as the ultrasonic time increases, and then become invariable when the ultrasonic time exceeds 6 h. Combining with the TEM results, it can be concluded that the FM increases as the size for the nanosheets decreases. Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) measurements are performed on the sample which has the maximum Ms, and the results are shown in Figure 4d. Results indicate that the FC curve exhibits an obvious deviation from the ZFC curve until 300 K, revealing that the Curie temperature of the sample is 300 K at least. Other exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets show the same ZFC and FC results, and the data are not shown here. Room-temperature ESR results shown in Figure 5a give further evidence for the FM of the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets. Besides the pristine MoS2 powder, all the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets have obvious ferromagnetic resonance signals. At the same time, the resonance center field (Hcenter) for the MoS2 nanosheets shifts to a lower value as the size of the nanosheets decreases, revealing the enhanced FM. It can be understood from the condition for resonance in the presence of anisotropy field (HA): hf/μBg = Hcenter + H A , where h is the Plank's constant, g ≈ 2 for a free electron, f (8.984 GHz) is the fixed frequency of the applied microwave magnetic field, and μ B is the Bohr magnetron, respectively [31]. The data in Figure 5b suggest an increase in anisotropy HA with a decreasing size of the nanosheets, which corresponds to the magnetic results of SQUID.
Figure 4

Room-temperature M - H , ZFC, and FC curves. (a) Room-temperature M-H curves for MoS2 pristine powders and nanosheets. (b) M-H curves for MoS2 nanosheets measured at 10 and 300 K: the DM signals of the samples have been deducted. (c) The dependence of the saturation magnetization of the MoS2 nanosheets on sonication time. (d) The ZFC and FC curves for the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets sonicated in DMF for 10 h.
Figure 5

ESR spectra and dependence of H center and H A on the sonication time. (a) Room-temperature ESR spectra for MoS2 pristine powders and nanosheets. (b) Dependence of resonance center field and the anisotropy field of MoS2 nanosheets on the sonication time.

Recent calculation results indicate that the absorption of a nonmetal element on the surface of low-dimensional systems can induce a local magnetic moment [32]. Because our samples of MoS2 nanosheets are obtained by sonicating in the solution of DMF for a long time, whether the experiment progress can lead to the absorption of nonmetal elements in the samples needs to be verified. Here, FTIR measurement was applied in the range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1 to study the chemical compositions and bonds of the samples (shown in Figure 6). Results indicate that there is only one weak absorption peak at 474.1 cm−1 for the pristine MoS2 powder, which can be ascribed to characteristic Mo-S stretching vibration mode of MoS2. Note that the exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets has the same FTIR result as the pristine MoS2 powder, indicating that there is no absorbed element induced during the experiment progress, and the observed FM in our case is not caused by the surface absorption. Furthermore, contamination of magnetic elements is a possible source of the observed FM in nonmagnetic materials, so it is important to rule out such possibility. In our case, first, XRD, HRTEM, and XPS results show no other phases and the possible impurities in the samples; second, the sensitivity of Ms values to the ultrasonic time seen above (Figure 4c), changing by almost ten orders of magnitude, may not be attributed to the possible contamination in the samples, especially when the MoS2 nanosheets were obtained by keeping all other parameters identical besides the sonication time. In addition, the ZFC curve for the sample having the maximum Ms shows no blocking temperature in the range of 5 to 300 K, indicating that there is no ferromagnetic contamination in the sample. Therefore, it is suggested that the observable FM in MoS2 nanosheets is not due to contaminants.
Figure 6

FTIR patterns. FTIR patterns of the solution DMF, the pristine MoS2 powder, and the MoS2 nanosheets sonicated in DMF for 10 h.

First-principle calculation results reveal the nonmagnetic properties for the infinitely single-layered MoS2, and the FM in MoS2 nanoribbons is considered to be dominated by its zigzag edges [15, 16], In addition, the unit magnetic moment of MoS2 nanoribbons (magnetic moment per MoS2 molecular formula) decreases gradually with increasing ribbon width, implying that the magnetism of MoS2 nanoribbons gets weaker and weaker as the ribbon width increases and disappears finally in the infinitely single-layered MoS2 and bulk. In our case, the size of the nanosheets decreases gradually with increasing ultrasonic time in the organic solvent DMF, and the enhancement of the FM for the nanosheets was also observed as the size decreases. This is because the magnetic behavior in MoS2 nanosheets results from the unsaturated edge atoms, and the ratio of edge atoms vs. total atoms increases dramatically as the size decreases. Therefore, the observed FM in MoS2 nanosheets is considered to be related to the intrinsic morphology of the materials.


In summary, MoS2 nanosheets of different sizes were fabricated by exfoliation of bulk MoS2 in DMF solution. Magnetic measurements indicate that all the fabricated MoS2 nanosheets show obvious RT FM, and the enhanced FM was observed as the size of the nanosheets decreases. The intrinsic room-temperature FM for the samples is considered to be related to the presence of edge spins on the edges of the nanosheets.



This work is supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB933101), NSFC (Grant Nos. 11034004 and 51202101), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. lzujbky-2012-28), and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education.

Authors’ Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of MOE, Lanzhou University


  1. Popov I, Seifert G, Tomanek D: Designing electrical contacts to MoS2 monolayers: a computational study. Phys Rev Lett 2012, 108: 156802.View Article
  2. Yin ZY, Li H, Li H, Jiang L, Shi YM, Sun YH, Lu G, Zhang Q, Chen XD, Zhang H: Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 2012, 6: 74. 10.1021/nn2024557View Article
  3. Lin YC, Zhang WJ, Huang JK, Liu KK, Lee YH, Liang CT, Chu CW, Li LJ: Wafer-scale MoS2 thin layers prepared by MoO3 sulfurization. Nanoscale 2012, 4: 6637–6641. 10.1039/c2nr31833dView Article
  4. Li H, Yin ZY, He QY, Li H, Huang X, Lu G, Fam DWH, Tok AIY, Zhang Q, Zhang H: Fabrication of single- and multilayer MoS2 film-based field-effect transistors for sensing NO at room temperature. Small 2012, 8: 63. 10.1002/smll.201101016View Article
  5. Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim C, Galli G, Wang F: Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett 2010, 10(4):1271. 10.1021/nl903868wView Article
  6. Lee C, Yan H, Brus LE, Heinz LE, Hone TF, Hone J, Ryu S: Anomalous lattice vibrations of single and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 2695. 10.1021/nn1003937View Article
  7. Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A: Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nature Nanotech. 2011, 6: 147.View Article
  8. Frey GL, Elani S, Homyonfer M, Feldman Y, Tenne R: Optical-absorption spectra of inorganic fullerenelike MS2 (M = Mo, W). Phys Rev B 1998, 57: 6666. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6666View Article
  9. Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF: Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 2010, 105: 136805.View Article
  10. Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A: Sketched oxide single-electron transistor. Nat Nanotechnol 2011, 6: 343. 10.1038/nnano.2011.56View Article
  11. Schwierz F: Nanoelectronics: flat transistors get off the ground. Nat Nanotechnol 2011, 6: 135. 10.1038/nnano.2011.26View Article
  12. Li Q, Newberg TJ, Walter EC, Hemminger JC, Pender RM: Polycrystalline molybdenum disulfide (2H−MoS2) nano- and microribbons by electrochemical/chemical synthesis. Nano Lett. 2004, 4: 277–281. 10.1021/nl035011fView Article
  13. Ataca C, Sahin H, Akturk E, Ciraci S: Mechanical and electronic properties of MoS2 nanoribbons and their defects. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115: 3934–3941. 10.1021/jp1115146View Article
  14. Shidpour R, Manteghian M: A density functional study of strong local magnetism creation on MoS2 nanoribbon by sulfur vacancy. Nanoscale 2010, 2: 1429–1435. 10.1039/b9nr00368aView Article
  15. Pan H, Zhang YW: Edge-dependent structural, electronic and magnetic properties of MoS2 nanoribbons. J Mater Chem 2012, 22: 7280–7290. 10.1039/c2jm15906fView Article
  16. Li YF, Zhou Z, Zhang SB, Chen ZF: MoS2 nanoribbons: high stability and unusual electronic and magnetic properties. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130: 16739–16744. 10.1021/ja805545xView Article
  17. Botello-Mendez AR, Lopez-Urias F, Terrones M, Terrones H: Metallic and ferromagnetic edges in molybdenum disulfide nanoribbons. Nanotechnology 2009, 20: 325703. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/32/325703View Article
  18. Seayad AM, Antonelli DM: Recent advances in hydrogen storage in metal-containing inorganic nanostructures and related materials. Adv Mater 2004, 16: 765–777. 10.1002/adma.200306557View Article
  19. Pü tz J, Aegerter MA: MoSx thin films by thermolysis of a single-source precursor. J Sol–gel Sci Technol 2000, 19: 821–824. 10.1023/A:1008728604305View Article
  20. Liu KK, Zhang WJ, Lee YH, Lin YC, Chang MT, Su CH, Chang CS, Li H, Shi YM, Zhang H, Lai CS, Li LJ: Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates. Nano Lett 2012, 12: 1538–1544. 10.1021/nl2043612View Article
  21. Zhang J, Soon JM, Loh KP, Yin JH, Ding J, Sullivian MB, Wu P: Magnetic molybdenum disulfide nanosheet films. Nano Lett 2007, 7: 2370–2376. 10.1021/nl071016rView Article
  22. Grace PJ, Venkatesan M, Alaria J, Coey JMD, Kopnov G, Naaman R: The origin of the magnetism of etched silicon. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 71–74. 10.1002/adma.200801098View Article
  23. Coleman JN, Lotya M, O'Neil A, Bergin SD, King PJ, Khan U, Young K, Gaucher A: Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 2011, 331: 568–571. 10.1126/science.1194975View Article
  24. Matte HSSR, Gomathi A, Manna AK, Late D, Datta R, Pati SK, Rao CNR: Synthesis of inorganic fullerene-like nanostructures by concentrated solar and artificial light. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010, 122: 4153–4155. 10.1002/ange.201000009View Article
  25. Altavilla C, Sarno M, Ciambelli P: A novel wet chemistry approach for the synthesis of sybrid 2D free-floating single or multilayer nanosheets of MS2@oleylamine (M=Mo, W). Chem Mater 2011, 23: 3879. 10.1021/cm200837gView Article
  26. Lin HT, Chen XY, Li HL, Yang M, Qi YX: Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of MoS2 nanorods. Mater Lett 2010, 64: 1748–1750. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.04.032View Article
  27. Goki E, Hisato Y, Damien V, Takeshi F, Chen MW, Manish C: Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett 2011, 11: 5111–5116. 10.1021/nl201874wView Article
  28. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov KS, Roth S, Geim AK: Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97: 187401–4.View Article
  29. Zhou KG, Mao NN, Wang HX, Peng Y, Zhang HL: A mixed-solvent strategy for efficient Exfoliation of inorganic graphene analogues. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011, 50: 10839–10842. 10.1002/anie.201105364View Article
  30. Gao DQ, Zhang J, Zhu JY, Qi J, Zhang ZH, Sui WB, Shi HG, Xue DS: Vacancy-mediated magnetism in pure copper oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 2010, 5: 769–772. 10.1007/s11671-010-9555-8View Article
  31. Seehra MS, Dutta P, Neeleshwar S, Chen YY, Chen CL, Chou SW, Chen CC, Dong CL, Chang CL: Size-controlled ex-nihilo ferromagnetism in capped CdSe quantum dots. Adv Mater 2008, 20: 1656–1660. 10.1002/adma.200702382View Article
  32. He JG, Wu KC, Sa RJ, Li QH, Wei YQ: Magnetic properties of nonmetal atoms absorbed MoS2 monolayers. Appl Phys Lett 2010, 96: 082504–3. 10.1063/1.3318254View Article


© Gao et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.