Open Access

First-principles investigation on the segregation of Pd at LaFe1-xPd x O3-y surfaces

  • Zhi-xue Tian1,
  • Akifumi Uozumi2,
  • Ikutaro Hamada3,
  • Susumu Yanagisawa4,
  • Hidetoshi Kizaki1,
  • Kouji Inagaki1 and
  • Yoshitada Morikawa1, 5Email author
Nanoscale Research Letters20138:203

DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-203

Received: 31 December 2012

Accepted: 21 March 2013

Published: 1 May 2013

Abstract

First-principles calculations were performed to investigate the effect of Pd concentration and oxygen vacancies on the stability of Pd at LaFeO3 surfaces. We found a much stronger tendency of Pd to segregate by taking the aggregation of Pd at LaFe1-xPd x O3-y surfaces into consideration, resulting in a pair of Pd-Pd around a vacancy. Moreover, we predicted that one oxygen-vacancy-containing FeO2-terminated surfaces would be stable at high temperatures by comparing the stability of LaFe1-xPd x O3-y surfaces, which further supports our previous conclusion that a Pd-containing perovskite catalyst should be calcined at 1,073 K or higher temperatures in air to enhance the segregation of Pd in the vicinity of surfaces to rapidly transform the Pd catalyst from oxidized to reduced states on the perovskite support.

Keywords

Perovskite LaFeO3 Palladium Density functional theory Surface segregation

Background

A three-way catalyst simultaneously transforms toxic exhaust emissions from motor vehicles into harmless gases. However, the sintering problem, i.e., the growth and agglomeration of precious metal particles on conventional catalysts during vehicle use dramatically degrades catalytic activity, and large amounts of precious metals are required to retain the activity of catalysts after long periods of use. Thus, intelligent catalysts have attracted worldwide attention due to their greatly improved durability as a result of the self-regenerative function of precious metal nanoparticles[13]. It has been confirmed that the activity of catalysts can be preserved, and the amount of precious metals that are required can be reduced by 70% to 90%[4, 5]. The self-regenerative function, which can be explained as resulting from the transformation of the state of precious metals (Pd, Pt, and Rh) that reversibly move into and out of the LaFe1-xM x O3 perovskite lattice, significantly suppresses the growth of precious metals during the use of catalysts.

Thus far, many experiments have been devoted to research on the state of Pd in perovskite in redox processes. Uenishi et al.[6] investigated the superior start-up activity of LaFePdO x at low temperatures (from 100°C to 400°C) using X-ray spectroscopic techniques under the practical conditions where they controlled automotive emissions. They found the Pd0 phase partially segregated outside the surface even at low temperatures; thus, the segregation of Pd0 under a reductive atmosphere induced the start-up activity of LaFePdO x . Eyssler et al. found a high concentration of Pd distributed on the LaFeO3 (LFO) surface that contributed to high methane combustion due to the formation of PdO in which Pd2+ was in square planar coordination. Additionally, two Pd species (Pd2+ at the surface and Pd3+ in a solid solution) were found to be generated in further calcination. Pd2+ and Pd3+ could be transformed in equilibrium under thermal treatment conditions[7, 8]. More recently, Eyssler et al. studied the state of Pd in different B-site substitutions and compared the effect of catalytic activities on methane combustion. A well-dispersed octahedral Pd-O species was found for Fe- and Co B- site cations, and PdO particles were on the LaMnO3 surface[9]. Above all, related investigations have become more important as the activity of catalysts strongly depends on the state of the precipitated Pd.

Hamada et al.[10] more recently found in a density functional theory (DFT) investigation that oxygen vacancies (VOs) that formed near the LFO surface promoted the segregation of Pd. They also proposed a scenario that perovskite containing precious metal is calcined during the catalyst preparation step at 1,073 K for 2 h in air, and then VOs are produced that enhance Pd segregation, resulting in a LaPdO3-y layer that eventually forms close to the surface. The LaPdO3-y layer in the vicinity of the surface promotes efficient switching between Pd metal particles under reductive conditions and the dissolved state of Pd in the LaFe1-xPd x O3 perovskite lattice under oxidative conditions. Therefore, the LaPdO3-y layers formed in the vicinity of the oxide surface play a key role in the self-regenerative function. Almost simultaneously, transmission electron microscopy observations[11] of atomic-scale processes in Pd-LFO catalysts have demonstrated that redox reactions between the formation of Pd particles on the Pd-LFO surface under reducing conditions and the dissolution of Pd particles into LFO under oxidizing conditions take place in spatially-limited areas, especially in the proximity of oxide surfaces, indicating strong interactions between Pd and oxide surfaces. Katz's results also provided strong support for the mechanism proposed by Hamada et al. However, the stability of the LaPdO3-y layer and the mechanism for Pd leaving the LaPdO3-y layer have not been discussed in detail. The interaction between Pd atoms in the perovskite host is especially important considering the possibility of nanoscale spinodal decomposition as pointed out by Kizaki et al.[12]. Therefore, we systemically studied the relative stability of the Pd m VOn-containing surfaces (m =1 and 2 and n =0, 1, and 2) in our present work to investigate possible phases appearing in steps to prepare catalysts at high temperature in air.

Methods

Model and computation

We have calculated the lattice constants[13] of LFO and the segregation tendency of Pd at two terminations of the perovskite surfaces with and without VO by using state[14, 15] and quantum ESPRESSO (QE)[16] codes. We found that both state and QE codes yielded the similar bulk lattice constants and caused the segregation behavior of Pd, which was a strong indication that both codes could admirably describe the properties of Pd incorporated in the LaFe1-xPd x O3-y surfaces. Here, we employed the state code to do the first-principles calculations. The ion-electron interactions were described using ultrasoft pseudopotentials[17], and the exchange and correlation potential was represented by a generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof formula[18]. DFT calculations with Hubbard correction (DFT+U) are known to correct the bandgap and magnetic moment in local-density approximation and generalized gradient approximation calculations. This method can yield reasonable agreement with the experimental results. We omitted DFT+U from this work because Hamada et al. verified[10] that electronic structures with DFT+U are qualitatively the same as those in GGA calculations, and they have not changed their conclusions. However, since the relative energies that are used to determine the stability of perovskite surfaces might be influenced by the exchange and correlation potential, even though DFT+U fails to give better results than GGA calculations to predict the phase stability of hematite surfaces[19], we still intend to investigate the effect of DFT+U in later work. The original unit cell used to construct the LFO perovskite surface was a GdFeO3-type orthorhombic unit cell (adapted from Figure one in[13]), in which the local magnetic moments of Fe are aligned in G-type anti-ferromagnetic order. The relaxed lattice constants for a, b, and c in bulk LFO correspond to 0.575, 0.559, and 0.792 nm, respectively, which are in reasonable agreement with the experimental values[20] of 0.558, 0.556, and 0.785 nm. The cutoff energies for the wave function and augmentation charge density are 25 Ry for the former and 225 Ry for the latter.

We modeled the 2 × 2 LFO (001) surface by using a repeated slab model. Hamada et al.[10] had already shown and we confirmed[13] that one VO formed in the LFO (001) surface promoted the tendency of Pd to segregate in bulk. Moreover, we further demonstrated that Pd has the strongest tendency to segregate at FeO2-terminated surfaces containing VOs, in comparison with three other surfaces, i.e., LaO-terminated surfaces with and without VOs and the perfect FeO2-terminated surfaces. Additionally, Lee et al.[21] calculated a surface phase diagram of the LFO (010) surface and argued that the LaO-terminated surface could be predicted to be stable at lower temperature (773 K), which was in agreement with the previous experimental results measured by X-ray photoelectron spectra[22, 23]. In contrast, the FeO2-terminated surface became dominant at high temperatures (>1,500 K). Therefore, thermal treatment at high temperature is essential to make FeO2-terminated surfaces more stable. We thus examined FeO2-terminated surfaces in this work. The atomic configuration for a pristine FeO2-terminated surface is in Figure 1, which was obtained with visual molecular dynamics[24]. Our repeated slab model consisted of nine atomic layers, i.e., five FeO2 layers and four LaO layers. Further, one unit cell contained eight La atoms, 10 Fe atoms, and 28 O atoms in total. Brillouin-zone integration was carried out within a Monkhorst-Pack[25] scheme using a uniform (4 × 4 × 1) mesh. We inserted a vacuum region of 11 Å to minimize the interaction between two adjacent slabs. We fixed the two bottom layers to the bulk coordinates during the geometry optimizations and allowed atomic relaxation for the rest of the layers.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-203/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1631_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Side views of FeO 2 -terminated surfaces. A vacuum region with a thickness of 11 Å is placed above the top surface. The green, brown, and red spheres correspond to La, Fe, and O, respectively. The computational unit cell used in the present research is indicated by the black solid line. The bottom two layers were fixed during optimization.

Results and discussion

Simplified 2D tables that represent the complicated atomic configurations of perovskite surfaces have been provided in Figure 2 to clarify the discussion. Configurations with negative formation energies are more stable than the reference configuration. One Pd segregating from the third FeO2 layer to the surface just releases an energy of about 0.08 eV[13] (Figure 2 group I (a) and (b)) as we demonstrated without VOs. However, when one Pd has already segregated on the topmost site of a perfect LFO surface, the additional Pd prefers to stay inside the bulk rather than segregate onto the surface as shown in Figures 2 group I (c) to (e). One first has to determine the positions of VOs and Pd atoms in studying the effect induced by VOs on the stability of Pd atoms. We have to calculate all the possible configurations containing VOs and Pd. Hamada et al.[10] pointed out that the most stable site for VOs is the topmost surface for pristine LFO and the subsurface (LaO layer) O site for Pd located in the first layer of the LFO surface. We considered VOs formed at those two possible sites along with various configurations of Pd atoms at the FeO2-terminated surface. We set the first configuration in panel (a) in group II to the reference state in which one Pd atom was located in the first FeO2 layer, the second Pd atom was in the third FeO2 layer, and a VO was located in the first LaO layer just under the first Pd. The positions of the first Pd atom and VO were found to have the most stable configuration. Positive formation energies for panels (i) to (m) in group II indicate that VOs that formed on the topmost surface is unstable. However, the most stable state was found with a formation energy of about -0.57 eV when a VO was located at the subsurface nearly at the center of two Pd atoms, as seen in Figure 2 group II (b). However, one of the Pd atoms tended to be buried in the second FeO2 layer (panel (b)) rather than exposed to the vacuum (panel (c) in group II), and the energy discrepancy between panels (b) and (c) was as large as 0.58 eV. We analyzed the projected density of state (PDOS) of the two Pd atoms in the VO-containing surfaces to understand the origin for the difference in stability between panels group II (b) and (c). All the results are presented in Figure 3. We denoted the Pd located at the top-left site in the unit cell in Figure 2 group II (a) to (c) as Pd-1 and the other one as Pd-2. Where Pd-2 stayed inside the bulk (Figure 2 group II (a)), the PDOS of Pd-1 looked similar to that in Figure five (e) in[13], i.e., a single Pd at the first FeO2 layer with one VO beneath it. The VO beneath Pd-1 reduces hybridization between the Pd d3z2-r2 state and O p state, leading to significant stabilization of the d3z2-r2 state. The degenerated e g states of 4d-orbitals for Pd-2 are singly occupied (Figure3a2). When Pd-2 replaces the Fe atom at the second FeO2 layer (Figure 2b), the change in PDOS of Pd-1 seems rather small and similar to that in panel (a1). However, the degeneracy of the e g state is lifted for Pd-2 because of the missing apical oxygen atom, leading to a downward shift in d3z2-r2 beneath the Fermi level, except for a small antibonding state near the Fermi level associated with hybridization between the Pd d3z2-r2 and p state of oxygen atom beneath it. The t2g states are also fully occupied in the form of a stable closed shell. The degeneracy of the e g state is lifted due to the lowering of symmetry at the surface for Pd-2 located at the first FeO2 layer (Figure 2 group II (c)). However, as there is another O at the subsurface, a much stronger antibonding Pd d3z2-r2 state appears near the Fermi level in contrast to that in panel (b2). Additionally, the d xy state remarkably increases in energy due to increased hybridization between the Pd-d xy and O-py/x states, and an especially sharp peak emerges at the Fermi level in the spin-up state. The Pd d xy state also appears near the Fermi level for Pd-1 as shown in panel (c1). The corresponding partial charge density for the peak at the Fermi level has been drawn on the (001) plane in panel (d). The spin-up partial charge density exhibits strong antibonding states in the form of pdπ* bonds between Pd and O in the energy window from -0.1 to +0.1 eV relative to the Fermi energy. As a result, the additional Pd at the neighboring surface site is less stable than that at the second FeO2 layer.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-203/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1631_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Simplified 2D tables that represent complicated structures of perovskite surfaces containing Pd n ( n =1 and 2). Groups I to III are for the geometries with no VO, one VO, and two VOs, respectively. The atomic configurations for each group, which are schematically represented by the table of panel (a), are indicated by the ball and stick model. The uncapping unit cell is indicated by the black line as seen in Figure 1. The rows containing Fe (Pd) in each table represent FeO2 (PdO2) layers, and the vertical lines represent O atoms in FeO2 (PdO2) layers. The horizontal lines represent O atoms in LaO layers (La atoms are not explicitly shown). The absence of vertical (horizontal) lines means VO forming at the surface (subsurface) site. The calculated difference in energy (in eV) for each panel relative to the total energy of the surface in panel (a) is also listed.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-203/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1631_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Calculated projected density of states (PDOS) of two Pd atoms. Panels (a1) to (c1) are the PDOSs for Pd-1 located at the top-left site of Figure 2 group II (a) to (c). Panels (a2) to (c2) represent the PDOSs of Pd-2, which is located at the third FeO2 layer (a2), at the subsurface (b2), or the first FeO2 layer (c2). Positive (negative) values refer to spin-up (spin-down) states. The line through the zero point on the horizontal axis represents the Fermi level. (d) is the top view of the calculated isosurface of the partial charge density of the PdO2-terminated surface containing VO in the spin-up state in an energy window of (-0.1, 0.1) eV. The yellow-curved isosurfaces stand for the charge density of 0.6 a.u.-3.

Since VOs are more likely to form at the subsurface (LaO layer) than the surface in the Pd-containing FeO2-terminated surface, we placed another VO in the same LaO layer (Figure 2 group III (a) to (c)). If two VOs are both located at the subsurface, the second Pd atom tends to substitute the Fe atom either at the second FeO2 layer forming a pair of Pd atoms (Figure 2 group III (b)) or on the surface forming the PdO2 layer (Figure 2 group III (c)). The difference in energy between these two configurations is less than 0.05 eV. Thus, the additional VO stabilizes the PdO2-layer exposed to the vacuum.

Thus far, we have assumed the existence of VO. However, the concentration of VOs depends on their formation energy. Therefore, we have to verify the stability of surfaces containing VO(s) with different concentrations of Pd by taking the formation energy of VOs into account to further strengthen our conclusion. We calculated the relative energies of surfaces containing Pd m VOn (m =1 and 2 and n =0, 1, and 2) relative to the perfect slab (without VOs) with Pd inside the bulk of LFO (see Figure 2 group I (a)). Note that the systems we have discussed here are surfaces with Pd atom(s) and VO(s) located on/near the surface. The relative energies (ΔErel) as a function of the chemical potential of oxygen (Δμ O ) are shown in Figure 4. The corresponding geometries for the Pd m VOn-containing surfaces are all included in Figure 2. Since two Pd atoms fail to segregate near/at the surface adjacently without VOs, the results for the Pd2-containing perfect surface excluded from Figure 4. The ΔErel for each colored line is calculated as:
Green line : Δ E rel = 2 E PdFeO 4 / LaO 2 / FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 6 tot 2 E ref tot ,
(1)
Green line : Δ E rel = 2 E PdFeO 4 / La 2 O 1 / FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 6 tot 2 E ref tot + 2 μ O ,
(2)
Pink line : Δ E rel = 2 E PdFeO 4 / La 2 / FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 6 tot 2 E ref tot + 4 μ O ,
(3)
Red line : Δ E rel = E PdFeO 4 / La 2 O 1 / PdFeO 4 / LaFeO 3 6 tot + E FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 8 tot 2 E ref tot + μ O ,
(4)
Blue line : Δ E rel = E PdFeO 4 / La 2 / PdFeO 4 / LaFeO 3 6 tot + E FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 8 tot 2 E ref tot + 2 μ O ,
(5)
where the first items in Equations 1 to 5 on the right-hand side are the total energies of the Pd m VOn-containing (m =1 and 2 and n =0, 1, and 2) surfaces, with their subscripts describing their compositions. E ref tot represents the total energy of the reference surface that contains one solid-solution state of Pd inside the bulk. The E FeO 2 2 / LaFeO 3 8 tot in Equations 4 and 5 is the total energy of the pristine FeO2-terminated surface. The μO is the chemical potential of oxygen. The chemical potentials of oxygen in the LFO bulk and gas phase are equal under equilibrium conditions. The μO based on an ideal gas approximation is directly connected with the partial pressure (p (O2)) and temperature (T) by
μ O 2 gas T , p = μ O 2 gas T , p 0 + kT ln p p o ,
(6)
Δ μ O gas T , p = 1 2 μ O 2 gas T , p E O 2 gas = Δ μ O gas T , p 0 + 1 2 kT ln p p o ,
(7)
in which k is the Boltzmann constant and p0 is taken to be the standard pressure. μ O 2 gas is the total energy of an isolated O2 molecule. The Δ μ O gas T , p 0 item is determined by using thermodynamic data from the thermochemical tables[26]. Hence, we can obtain the formation energy of VO(s) based on Equations 2 to 5 by subtracting the item in Equation 1. As we assumed that the chemical potential of La would be very low in the present research, no metallic La or La oxides could precipitate on the surface although the La-O bonds were broken due to the formation of VOs in the first LaO layer (Figures 2 groups II and III). According to the equations, the positive ΔErel means the reference surface is more stable.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1556-276X-8-203/MediaObjects/11671_2012_Article_1631_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Calculated relative energies of five LFO surfaces containing Pd m V O n . This is with respect to the dissolution phase of the LaFe1-xPd x O3 slab as a function of Δμ O and oxygen partial pressure at high temperatures.

We can find from Figure 4 that when ΔμO is greater than -1.17 eV (point A), no VOs form on the surface. The Pd-segregated surface (Figure 2 group I (b)) is slightly more stable than the surface with Pd inside the bulk of the perovskite (Figure 2 group I (a)). This indicates that Pd preferentially stays at the first layer of the LFO surface than the bulk position to some extent. One VO in the surface appears at the subsurface (LaO layer) when ΔμO is lower than -1.17 eV. The surface containing Pd2VO is predicted to be stable between points A and B, indicating conditions with standard pressure at temperatures between 1,000 and 1,500 K. Two Pd atoms attract each other in such a surface by sharing one VO in the first LaO layer (Figure 2 group II (b)). The Pd1VO1-containing surface (Figure 2 group II (n)) becomes dominant at ΔμO below -1.67 eV (point B) under standard pressure at temperatures over 1,500 K. Two VOs-containing surfaces are predicted to be dramatically unstable compared with the other three surfaces due to the greater formation energy of two VOs under the conditions given in Figure 4. The Pd1VO2-containing surface (Figure 2 group III (d)) will appear under standard pressure at temperatures far above 1,500 K (the pink line: the critical point is beyond the scale of Figure 4). The surface containing Pd2VO2 (Figure 2 group III (b)) for the blue line is predicted to be unstable under any conditions as presented in Figure 4. From what we have mentioned above, one VO can be produced at the first LaO layer of the FeO2-terminated surfaces with segregated Pd m (m =1 and 2) under reasonable working conditions, and such surfaces are predicted to be dominantly stable over a wide range of ΔμO.

Conclusions

We investigated what effect oxygen vacancies had on the tendency of additional Pd atoms to segregate at the LaFe1-xPd x O3-y surface, as well as compared the relative stability of FeO2-terminated surfaces that contained Pd m VOn versus the oxygen chemical potential, by using first-principles theoretical calculations. We pointed out that Pd atoms repulse one another without VOs. However, if there are VOs at the subsurface layer, Pd atoms become attractive, forming a pair of Pd atoms while sharing one VO. Furthermore, we clarified that the FeO2-terminated surface containing Pd m VO could be predicted to become stable over a wide range of oxygen chemical potentials below -1.17 eV. Therefore, the present results provide support that the calcination of precious metals containing catalysts at 1,073 K or high temperatures in air during the catalyst preparation step leads to the formation of oxygen vacancies near the surface and then enhances the formation of a LaPdO3-y layer in the vicinity of the LaFeO3 oxide surface.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The present work was partly supported by a Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) program called the “Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center” (since 2012). The Advanced Institute for Materials Research (AIMR) was established by the World Premier Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. The calculations were done at the supercomputer centers of Osaka University, the Institute for Solid State Physics, the University of Tokyo, and Tohoku University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Precision Science & Technology and Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University
(2)
Insitute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University
(3)
Advanced Institute for Materials Research (AIMR), Tohoku University
(4)
Department of Physics and Earth Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus
(5)
Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB), Kyoto University

References

  1. Nishihata Y, Mizuki J, Akao T, Tanaka H, Uenishi M, Kimura M, Okamoto T, Hamada N: Self-regeneration of a Pd-perovskite catalyst for automotive emissions control. Nature 2002, 418: 164–167. 10.1038/nature00893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tanaka H, Uenishi M, Taniguchi M, Tan I, Narita K, Kimura M, Kaneko K, Nishihata Y, Mizuki J: The intelligent catalyst having the self-regenerative function of Pd, Rh and Pt for automotive emissions control. Catal Today 2006, 117: 321–328. 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.05.029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Tanaka H, Taniguchi M, Uenishi M, Kajita N, Tan I, Nishihata Y, Mizuki J, Narita K, Kimura M, Kaneko K: Self-regenerating Rh- and Pt-based perovskite catalysts for automotive-emissions control. Angew Chem Int Ed 2006, 45: 5998–6002. 10.1002/anie.200503938View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sato N, Tanaka H, Tan I, Uenishi M, Kajita N, Taniguchi M, Narita K, Kimura M: Research on the co-free intelligent catalyst. In Proceedings of the SAE 2003 World Congress & Exhibition: March 3, 2003. Detroit. Warrendale: SAE International; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Tanaka H, Taniguchi M, Kajita N, Uenishi M, Tan I, Sato N, Narita K, Kimura M: Design of the intelligent catalyst for Japan ULEV standard. Topics Catal 2004, 30/31: 389.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Uenishi M, Taniguchi M, Tanaka H, Kimura M, Nishihata Y, Mizuki J, Kobayashi T: Redox behavior of palladium at start-up in the perovskite-type LaFePdO x automotive catalysts showing a self-regenerative function. Appl Catal Environ 2005, 57: 267–273. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.11.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Eyssler A, Mandaliev P, Winkler A, Hug P, Safonova O, Figi R, Weidenkaff A, Ferri D: The effect of the state of Pd on methane combustion in Pd-doped LaFeO3. J Phys Chem C 2010, 114: 4584. 10.1021/jp911052sView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Eyssler A, Winkler A, Mandaliev P, Hug P, Weidenkaff A, Ferri D: Influence of thermally induced structural changes of 2 wt% Pd/LaFeO3 on methane combustion activity. Appl. Catal. B: Enviro. 2011, 106: 494–502. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.06.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Eyssler A, Winkler A, Nachtegaal M, Matam SK, Hug P, Safonova O, Weidenkaff A, Ferri D: On the state of Pd in Perovskite-type oxidation catalysts of composition A(B, Pd)O3±δ (A = La, Y; B = Mn, Fe, Co). Chem Mater 2012, 24: 1864–1875. 10.1021/cm300571yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamada I, Uozumi A, Morikawa Y, Yanase A, Katayama-Yoshida H: A density functional theory study of self-regenerating catalysts LaFe1–xM x O3–y (M = Pd, Rh, Pt). J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133: 18506–18509. 10.1021/ja110302tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Katz M, Graham G, Duan Y, Liu H, Adamo C, Schlom D, Pan X: Self-regeneration of Pd–LaFeO3 catalysts: new insight from atomic-resolution electron microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133: 18090–18093. 10.1021/ja2082284View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kizaki H, Kusakabe K, Nogami S, Katayama-Yoshida H: Generation of nano-catalyst particles by spinodal nano-decomposition in perovskite. Appl Phys Express 2008, 1: 104001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tian ZX, Inagaki K, Morikawa Y: Density functional theory on the comparison of the Pd segregation behavior at LaO- and FeO2-terminated surfaces of LaFe1-xPd x O3-y. Current Appl Phys 2012, 12: S105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Morikawa Y, Ishii H, Seki K: Theoretical study of n -alkane adsorption on metal surfaces. Phys Rev B 2004, 69: 041403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sawada H, Morikawa Y, Terakura K, Hamada N: Jahn-Teller distortion and magnetic structures in LaMnO3. Phys Rev B 1997, 56: 12154–12160. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12154View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Giannozzi P, Baroni S, Bonini N, Calandra M, Car R, Cavazzoni C, Ceresoli D, Chiarotti GL, Cococcioni M, Dabo I, Corso AD, Gironcoli S, de Fabris S, Fratesi G, Gebauer R, Gerstmann U, Gougoussis C, Kokalj A, Lazzeri M, Martin-Samos L, Marzari N, Mauri F, Mazzarello R, Paolini S, Pasquarello A, Paulatto L, Sbraccia C, Scandolo S, Sclauzero G, Seitsonen AP, Smogunov A, Umari P, Wentzcovitch RM: QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys Condens Matter 2009, 21: 395502. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Vanderbilt D: Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys Rev B 1990, 41: 7892–7895. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77: 3865. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Barbier A, Stierle A, Kasper N, Guittet M–J, Jupille J: Surface termination of hematite at environmental oxygen pressures: Experimental surface phase diagram. Phys Rev B 2007, 75: 233406.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Shivakumara C: Low temperature synthesis and characterization of rare earth orthoferrites LnFeO3 (Ln=La, Pr and Nd) from molten NaOH flux. Solid State Commun 2006, 139: 165. 10.1016/j.ssc.2006.05.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee CW, Behera RK, Wachsman ED, Phillpot SR, Sinnott SB: Stoichiometry of LaFeO3 (010) surface determined from first-principles and thermodynamic calculations. Phys Rev B 2011, 83: 115418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Giraudon J–M, Elhachimi A, Wyrwalski F, Siffert S, Aboukais A, Lamonier J–F, Leclercq G: Studies of the activation process over Pd perovskite-type oxides used for catalytic oxidation of toluene. Appl Catal B: Environmental 2007, 75: 157. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Miquel P, Yamin Y, Lombaert K, Dujardin C, Granger P: Thermal ageing induced effects on Pd/LaFeO3 for NOx reduction by hydrocarbons: influence of the preparation method. Top Catal 2009, 52: 1791. 10.1007/s11244-009-9333-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K: VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics 1996, 14: 33. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD: Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 1976, 13: 5188. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Linstrom PJ: Mallard WG (Eds): NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database No. 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaitherburg, MD; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Tian et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.